I strongly believe that some of these looks would have looked considerably better if they were styled with tights instead of these god awful leggings 🙄
@@She_Ghost Yeah. And they could have showcased even more of the embroiderers skills and craftsmanship. The only thing that was semi acceptable out of that collection was the lattice dress.
I agree even if they were full on jumpsuits that were a tight material would have been a lot better and a little more innovative then the cheap forever 21 active looking legging and jumpsuits they used.
Some of those looks went waaaaay into 2008 with those leggings. I swear on my life I wore a cheap version of that last look -minus the length in the back- and I am NOT proud lol.
@@Didi-qc3vc which is what the designers sometimes forget. Chanel had a keen sense of who she was and what she wanted. If they want younger customers, reimagine Chanel as a young woman, starting out in our time....... but with a similar background, ambition and vision
This collection is very: "Hello youth, we're now trying to cater to you. We're now a hip and cool brand, and not just for your grandma. Please gives us your (parents) money." What a mess SMFH
Hi, I’m a grad student in Art History, and I specialize in late medieval French art. If you were wondering, the floral knit set is a reference to millefleur tapestries that were extremely popular amongst the nobility during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Love your channel!
I just wanted to make a comment similar to this one. I think that she was very inspired by renaissance clothing and in my opinion, all of this is modernized in a good way. I don't think she deserved this much criticism.
@@bojanajede I studied History of Art and there is no such thing as French Renaissance, Renaissance is only Italian and XVI century is Baroque, depending of the country in Europe it can be Manierism but considering France strong Baroque... it is Baroque.
@@PilarNarvaezalvarez Well I've a degree in History of Art too and I can guarantee that at least at the Ecole du Louvre they do use the term "French Renaissance" to describe the art under the Valois reign (mostly François Ier and then his son Henri II)
@@SoWhosGae at first I thought the same thing then I remembered my age and was like ohh yeah. But it is an HBO original now and they are known for good shows and having a budget so we’ll see. it’s new characters and meant to be more closely related to the books.
@@brandonpadilla5402 Hmmm Idk why but it seems pretty questionable to me to say the least, lol. Also I know the show didn't follow the characters and plots from the books at all (except for the names and a few other stuff), but the books always read like a mess to me tbh tbh. Don't know how you can adapt them logically.
I totally agree. This collection is a mess, those tights in every single look, really virginie??!Some ideas were good but to be honest, the execution wasn’t there. Overall, I’m disappointed.
My biggest issue with the tights/leggings/bodysuits was that if they were at least in complimentary colors and fabrics, I could have possibly overlooked them. If they were done well, they could've been a statement about the juxtaposition of modesty in an increasingly sexualized world. Be what we got: they just looked like she bought a bunch of deep discount zentai suits, cut them up, and threw them on the models with no care about even complimenting colors. (OMG they make me irrationally angry)
Now that 2000s are slowly back (eg. Dua Lipa white hair strands and those baguette bags), designers are trying to revive 2007 I guess..,the worst period in fashion by the way🥴 hope it doesn’t go into masses!!!
@@cookiesandmilk512 I’m not questioning the way people dressed in the 15th century, but I think there were millions of ways to do this collection based on the concept they had and to me it just failed to deliver to the audience they wanted to target. 20 to 25 year olds are never going to wear these skirt/legging combos, not even if they’re Chanel
I have to say my biggest sticking point with the leggings is that by cutting off the design at the ankle and then putting a strap heel or just a heel on, it makes me feel like I'm looking at a completely separate part of the outfit. It loses its sense of continuity and doesn't draw my eye all the way through the outfit. This is disappointing cause it just reminds me of every single girl from middle school in 2012 when leggings and open shoes were THE THING. And I have no desire to be reminded of early 2010's middle school fashion in a Channel Show.
Yeah exactly my thought ahha Some fashion items from the 2000s can be redeemable but not leggings with open toes...please stop Virginie, it’s not cute. At all.
It really looks like she took the ugliest part of queens gambit (the checkered board print on those awful skirts) and decided to style everything else around it as if we were stuck in a fever dream of the earlier seasons of gossip girl
The chateau is gorgeous. Visited it a few years ago and I am still in awe... Fantastic setting . Though my gay ass wanted more Kristen Stewart on screen...
There were a few fresh, modern looks in this collection. The finale was promising. But so much of it was drab and shapeless. The styling was also very hit and miss. At its best it was brilliant, at its worst it was white and cobalt blue leggings.
About the bodysuit at 11:10: It looks like something designed for KPop Idols as a stage outfit. Literally my first thought was "Now I can see Jennie wear that" 👀👀👀 Love the outfit, tbh, but the entire collection was rather... Up and down. Lowkey hating that they are trying to make leggings under skirts a thing again... Hello, the late 2000s called, they want their marikondo'd crap back.
I would've LOVED to see the historical silhouettes and the lavish hair pieces of the 16th century rather than this. They had soooooo much potential with the theme and the setting😫
To be honest, I liked the collection... (ignoring the tights) The collection felt different in some weird way and I’m just glad it’s not 800 tweed jackets.
Yes, I don’t understand people who feel so strongly about it, it was beautiful. Those last few years Chanel has been so lazy « oh here, take some tweed jackets pearl necklaces and black dresses that look like Chanel’ boarding school uniform » At least this one is surprising and inspiring
Death, it's one of the biggest events that will ever take place in your life. We face death everyday, conscious or unconsciously of it; death lurks around every corner of our life. Like a lion waiting to catch its prey, death comes for us all in many shapes and form; seemingly there is no one who can escape from the jaws of death. But did you know there is a reason why we die? The idea of death you're familiar with is only the tip of the iceberg. See we die because we've sinned against God. Death according to the bible is wages " for the wages of sin is death " (Romans 6:23). Because man sinned against God, we live in a fallen world, it was once perfect, but now in ruins. Now that sin exists, God is coming to judge the world In righteousness. It's appointed a man once to die and after this judgement" (Hebrews 9:27) The standard he'll judge you by is the 10 commandments, God's moral law. He's so serious about sin that he gave anyone who sins the death sentence, the bible says you've earned it through sinning against God and each time you sin you build up his wrath. “The soul who sins shall die.” (Ezekiel 18:4) The punishment is the eternal fires of Hell " Where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth" (Matthew 13:42) You will have to face God on Judgement Day. Will you go to Heaven or Hell? Here’s a quick test: 1-You shall have no other gods before me. 2-You shall not make any idols. 3-You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain. 4-Remember the Sabbath Day. 5-Honor your father and mother. 6-You shall not murder. 7-You shall not commit adultery. 8-You shall not steal. 9-You shall not lie. 10-You shall not covet. Have you ever told a lie? stolen anything? used God’s name in vain? have you ever looked at anyone with lust? He sees lust as adultery, “Whoever looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”(Matthew 5:28) Have you ever hated someone? he sees hatred as murder, ”Anyone who hates another brother or sister is a murderer, (1 John 3:15) James 2:10 says, “the person who keeps all of the laws except one is as guilty as a person who has broken all of God’s laws.” Don't rely on your own goodness or good works to save you. That's like bribing God to let you into heaven; Nor a church, pastor, priest, or any religion. None of us are good at all, even murderers, rapists, even Hilter will call themselves Good and they'll try to justify themselves by their Good works. But the bible says: • "But we are all like an unclean thing, and all of our righteousnesses are like filthy rags; we fade as a leaf, and our iniquities, like wind have taken us away." (Isaiah 64:6) God's definition of good is morally excellent and therefore he demands absolute pperfections. No one can ever match his standards. That's why Jesus said: • " No one is good except God alone." (Luke 18:19) If you have done any of those things, God sees you as guilty of breaking His law and the Bible warns that the guilty will end up in Hell. Will YOU be guilty on Judgement Day? "For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." (Romans 6:23) God sent His Son to suffer and die on the cross. Jesus took the punishment upon Himself and defeated death on the cross; not because your Good but because God is rich in mercy. “For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life.” (John 3:16) Jesus rose from the dead and defeated death. Repent (turn from sin) today and trust in Jesus and God will grant you everlasting life; you'll also be born again. He'll give you a new heart that desires righteousness, what is just and a heart that will love God. that is why Jesus said "Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." (John 3:3) Then, Read the Bible and obey what you read. ☆ When Are You Going To Get Right With God? “Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts as you did in the rebellion“ (Hebrews 3:15) “Now is the accepted time, behold now is the day of salvation.” (2 Corinthians 6:2) • " Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved." (Acts 4:12) It's your choice. I'll leave you with this "What shall profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? " (Mark 8:36) If you're taking this seriously, Would you like a prayer? This prayer is not a guarantee that you'll be saved, that's between you and God. However, I'd like this to be a good start for your journey. "Father, I thank you for this person's open heart and ask that he/she would repent and trust alone in Jesus christ. I also ask that you guide their steps on their journey so that they would pass from death to life. In Jesus name amen. When you get alone before God and repent (turn from your sins) of your sins. Use Psalm 51 as a model to help you. When you find time please read this: www.livingwaters.com/save-yourself-some-pain/
@Carne Guisada God gave you a conscience to know right from wrong so therefore he will judge your thought life, your every motives and even your words. "But I tell you that for every careless word that people speak, they shall give an accounting for it in the day of judgement. For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned." (Matthew 12:36-37) If you were to die in your sins and God gave you justice for breaking his law. You have his promise that he'll send you to Hell; God's prison without parole. "all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone," (Revelation 21:8) No thieves, blasphemers( Taking God's in vain is called blasphemy, punishable by death in the old testament and God holds no one guiltless who takes his name in vain), Adulterers, murderers will enter the kingdom of Heaven. You either believe or reject the free gift of God that is in Jesus Christ. If you reject Jesus then your damned for hell. "You will perish unless you repent of yours sins and turn to God." (Luke 13:3) I am the way, the truth, and the life. no one comes to the father except through me (John 14:6) I encourage you to strongly think about what you've read because I love you and care about you. You could die in your sleep and end up in hell Neither me nor God wants that for you. Listen to the fear you may have after reading this, you may think the fear you have is bad but it's actually your friend and , because it's trying to persevere you from ending up in Hell. “It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.” Hebrews 10:31 "And by the fear of the LORD one departs from evil." Proverbs 16:6
@@en4017 How long were you waiting to pull this speech out? Look, I'm Catholic. Yet I find this to be incredibly obnoxious and I really don't like the implications towards the op. The op just made a joke (that I found funny). There was really no need for a sermon.
Honestly I didn’t mind this Chanel collection, I think it had really nice pieces but maybe the styling of clothes didn’t help to highlight it. Also the jumpsuits/tights under the clothes are distracting.
Chanel needs to look back in the archives from the 90s for inspiration to garner a more youthful audience because not only are those collections amazing but they also still hold up trend wise today
There is this one episode of iCarly where one of the main characters, Freddie, takes a girl who is also a witch to prom and the look at 15:05 looks like an evolved version of that girl
If they want to cater to the younger generation they need to change up their silhouettes and experiment with materials and exaggerate what they are referencing.
It’s honestly a breath of fresh air that an influencer understands fashion and speaks so well on the subject. Reviews not influenced by a purse or other gifts. The reviews in vogue and wwd are what we would all wait for..... I miss those days! Thank you!
I like the fact that the colors are not "loud". I thought this collection will be better than the previous one but it's not, sadly. I appreciate the inspiration of the chateau to the accessories though.
17:46 LIVING for the wide-brim black hat on the sleek all-black look (although would be better without the leggings or tights or whatever they are). YES we are bringing witch vibes into 2021 babeyyyyy!
Everyone commenting on the leggings but failing to realize most ppl now a days live in and swear by their active apparel. This is a nod to the continuing trend and shift to a much more comfortable, less fussy pant and life style we all are after especially during this time of stay at home orders. The collection is highly contextual in its past and current happenings while still remaining true to and to the evolution of the house of Chanel. Virginie is doing a incredible of job of shifting the house to be much more relevant and real- while keeping true to the foundations Chanel is known for. The styling and use of accessories in this show was so beautiful and meticulously crafted helping to further tell this Château de Dames story.
When to use leggins: - if you are a teenager who wants to wear a short dress/skirt and your parent say nope... - if it's freezing and you need to put winter leggins under your clothe to warm yourself - sport or staying home
I actually really like that black peacock feather knit jumper and out of the collection, aS a yOuNg PeRsOn, I wanted that the most. It looks cozy, slightly haute goth, and very wearable with a pair of cropped demin trousers in black, a pearly chain belt and some DMs. Nothing else really seems worth it at least to me
You are hilarious!! You were so nice and this collection did not deserve it! I also think you are a not so subtle historian! I appreciate that you frame your commentary in history.
Thanks for highlighting the Chanel Métiers d'Art. My sister who is a experienced plumassière started her career at Lemarié. I thought you might want to know that it does not pronounce "Lew-Mare" (as in Christophe Lemaire) but "Lew-Ma-Ree-Ay" (as in Le Marié, French for "The Groom").
I just want to say that I undestand your point but also , chanel is desingned for rich people and most of them are lets say "mature" . I liked when things were classy and i feel sad that critics push brands like this to be "trendy" , just let them be authentic
I also liked it. And I actually really appreciate that he said it’s « subjectively horrible ». Haha, I absolutely love it when people use the correct words :)
Loved this review! Completely agree that the styling was awful (those bodysuits) and only distracted from the collection. I like VV so I’m hopeful she’ll get better once she stops trying to appease the new and older customers at the same time
I really dislike the jumpsuit underneath the clothing. It just completely made me cringe. I like the checkerboard on some pieces and the jewelry. Makeup is done simplistically well.
I’m living for your fashion reviews / roast’s 💯 and Quite saddened to hear that you won’t be doing them much anymore as l enjoy your take on them so much and I live for all The fashion history that you add, thank you for all that you are doing loveing it! ❤️🙏🏼
I honestly can never see these runways as full outfits, they're all just like weird combinations of clothing that just makes me think of it as two walking clothing racks that are on top of each other for no reason whatsoever, solely because the retailers organize their clothing in such a manner
The problem for me is that I don´t know who this Chanel woman is. Like ok, she has money but is she young (like in her 20s or 30s) or older? Plus also I miss the joy and emotions, from the models and the clothes as well.
I actually like that checkerboard skirt (call me basic!) but it’s very basic for a luxury brand to be doing.. mostly because it was styled awfully with those tights ...
Maybe they didn’t. Not have money but maybe they had trouble with heating. It’s an Old ass place, and it could’ve been having remodeling done and then it just wasn’t done in time for the show itself to be recorded so they had to do some modifications on the outfits ( I.e. the ill fitting jumpsuits”)
Oh come on, nobody thinks about these things in a fashion show...if the designer wants to put a model in a swimsuit in the middle of the winter, he will. Don’t try to justify these horrible fashion choices of Chanel 😛
I strongly believe that some of these looks would have looked considerably better if they were styled with tights instead of these god awful leggings 🙄
Agree. Like tights with little pearls or translucent black/white/Gray/pink. But those leggings were like a block of useless color.
@@She_Ghost Yeah. And they could have showcased even more of the embroiderers skills and craftsmanship. The only thing that was semi acceptable out of that collection was the lattice dress.
they seriously look like tights a 6 year old would wear to pre-school
I agree even if they were full on jumpsuits that were a tight material would have been a lot better and a little more innovative then the cheap forever 21 active looking legging and jumpsuits they used.
Some of those looks went waaaaay into 2008 with those leggings.
I swear on my life I wore a cheap version of that last look -minus the length in the back- and I am NOT proud lol.
“Before you leave the house, look in the mirror and take one thing off"
Chanel really needs to listen to their own advice
That thing would be the leggings. I'm horrified.
I doubt she would have allowed this to be put out herself if she was here today
@@Ana-sj5xx exactly
@@Didi-qc3vc which is what the designers sometimes forget. Chanel had a keen sense of who she was and what she wanted.
If they want younger customers, reimagine Chanel as a young woman, starting out in our time....... but with a similar background, ambition and vision
Mrs Coco Chanel is shaking in her grave
This collection is very: "Hello youth, we're now trying to cater to you. We're now a hip and cool brand, and not just for your grandma. Please gives us your (parents) money."
What a mess SMFH
EXACTLY!!!!
Literally trying to do what Coach did, just completely the other side of the coin. Coach really killed it. This is just.. sad
Well said Dario Fontana well said
How do you do fellow fashionable kids
@@Hamppariranskis beat me to it 😂
Hi, I’m a grad student in Art History, and I specialize in late medieval French art. If you were wondering, the floral knit set is a reference to millefleur tapestries that were extremely popular amongst the nobility during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Love your channel!
amazing thank you so much!! i knew it had to mean something, cause Virginie is really about her details!!
I just wanted to make a comment similar to this one. I think that she was very inspired by renaissance clothing and in my opinion, all of this is modernized in a good way. I don't think she deserved this much criticism.
One of my majors is Art History and I'm hoping that this comment is a glimpse into my future
@@bojanajede I studied History of Art and there is no such thing as French Renaissance, Renaissance is only Italian and XVI century is Baroque, depending of the country in Europe it can be Manierism but considering France strong Baroque... it is Baroque.
@@PilarNarvaezalvarez Well I've a degree in History of Art too and I can guarantee that at least at the Ecole du Louvre they do use the term "French Renaissance" to describe the art under the Valois reign (mostly François Ier and then his son Henri II)
Why do most of these remind me of Disney channel sitcom stylings where people are wearing vests over collared shirts and tights with a tutu
Totally. Never understood that crap layering. It‘s like vomiting on a turd
The leggings are very 2000s gossip girl too
LMAO
Omg this is literally the annoying popular girl in camp rock 😂😂😂
It’s like Chanel mistook our generations’ style trends with gossip girl.
''what do the young people like?''
someone working at chanel: ''gossip girl''
I think this is interesting seeing as we are getting a hbo gossip girl reboot. Is this just basic trend forecasting due to the show.
@@brandonpadilla5402 What? A GG reboot?? Why?
@@SoWhosGae at first I thought the same thing then I remembered my age and was like ohh yeah. But it is an HBO original now and they are known for good shows and having a budget so we’ll see. it’s new characters and meant to be more closely related to the books.
@@brandonpadilla5402 Hmmm Idk why but it seems pretty questionable to me to say the least, lol. Also I know the show didn't follow the characters and plots from the books at all (except for the names and a few other stuff), but the books always read like a mess to me tbh tbh. Don't know how you can adapt them logically.
these leggins are hideous, they weren't cute in middle school back in 2010 and aren't now either
The top of the "jumpsuit" looks like an Aeropostale camisole
👁👄👁thems the fun part tho
agreed
I totally agree. This collection is a mess, those tights in every single look, really virginie??!Some ideas were good but to be honest, the execution wasn’t there. Overall, I’m disappointed.
@@klnsradieschen ij7o77666oy6
My biggest issue with the tights/leggings/bodysuits was that if they were at least in complimentary colors and fabrics, I could have possibly overlooked them. If they were done well, they could've been a statement about the juxtaposition of modesty in an increasingly sexualized world. Be what we got: they just looked like she bought a bunch of deep discount zentai suits, cut them up, and threw them on the models with no care about even complimenting colors.
(OMG they make me irrationally angry)
They need to burn those leggings.
Or turn them into tights
yes pls
Teenage me figured out that leggings with dresses/skirts and ballet flats were ugly like 13 years ago... whyyy Chanel?
The legging - dress combos give me nightmares
I get war-like flashbacks from the 2010's
Now that 2000s are slowly back (eg. Dua Lipa white hair strands and those baguette bags), designers are trying to revive 2007 I guess..,the worst period in fashion by the way🥴 hope it doesn’t go into masses!!!
Welcome to 2007
please look back at 15th century people wear stockings similar like that and of course this is modern day so they make it as leggings
@@cookiesandmilk512 I’m not questioning the way people dressed in the 15th century, but I think there were millions of ways to do this collection based on the concept they had and to me it just failed to deliver to the audience they wanted to target. 20 to 25 year olds are never going to wear these skirt/legging combos, not even if they’re Chanel
Seems like Virginie is focusing so hard on details and forgets the big picture.
i love your profile pic
This is the nicest way to put this awful mess of style! Totally agreed.
I would say this collection is a hot mess, but honestly there's nothing hot about it.
It's just a mess.
me: oh that one's kinda nice
luke: that's the most hideous skirt I've ever seen
me: yeah yeah that's ugly af
Same feel here
Styling is were a lot of runways lose me.
I was thinking the same, that execution was a bit off...
Chanel: "We're not like the regular brands, we're a cool brand"
This concerns me 😐
I loved the collection
I have to say my biggest sticking point with the leggings is that by cutting off the design at the ankle and then putting a strap heel or just a heel on, it makes me feel like I'm looking at a completely separate part of the outfit. It loses its sense of continuity and doesn't draw my eye all the way through the outfit. This is disappointing cause it just reminds me of every single girl from middle school in 2012 when leggings and open shoes were THE THING. And I have no desire to be reminded of early 2010's middle school fashion in a Channel Show.
Yeah exactly my thought ahha Some fashion items from the 2000s can be redeemable but not leggings with open toes...please stop Virginie, it’s not cute. At all.
Yes, basically that it is a total waste of the highest level of seamstresses, cutters, beaders, and all workers at Chanel.
RUclips being rude as hell didn't notify me, well, I'm here and ready for the fashion roast now 😤
i'm gonna have to have a lil talk with ms.youtube
not miss Viard trying to bury this video
I liked about 6 of the outfits from this collection and all of the belts of course
Luke, if you ever feel like analyzing the outfits of Beth in The Queen’s Gambit, then we’d love to see it ❤️
I don’t think he will because Mina Le did a great job already ruclips.net/video/dRP5R1aq8A8/видео.html
It really looks like she took the ugliest part of queens gambit (the checkered board print on those awful skirts) and decided to style everything else around it as if we were stuck in a fever dream of the earlier seasons of gossip girl
The chateau is gorgeous. Visited it a few years ago and I am still in awe... Fantastic setting
.
Though my gay ass wanted more Kristen Stewart on screen...
The styling, just why? why makes it look really unattractive, didn't they want to sell the clothes?
The electric blue leggings really sent me.... so many questions.
Right? The rest of the outfit I wasn’t mad at.
seriously where tf did those come from
There were a few fresh, modern looks in this collection. The finale was promising. But so much of it was drab and shapeless. The styling was also very hit and miss. At its best it was brilliant, at its worst it was white and cobalt blue leggings.
Agreed with this
Maybe you should review some of your favorite Karl's old collections (like the earlier Metiers d'Arts) because Virginie is a mess.
Yes I like this idea
Luke, you are so put together it is RIDICULOUS! The sweater, the denim, the colors, the hair YES *chefs kiss
the best thing about this show was that kristen stewart was the only guest
Yes!
About the bodysuit at 11:10:
It looks like something designed for KPop Idols as a stage outfit.
Literally my first thought was "Now I can see Jennie wear that" 👀👀👀
Love the outfit, tbh, but the entire collection was rather... Up and down.
Lowkey hating that they are trying to make leggings under skirts a thing again... Hello, the late 2000s called, they want their marikondo'd crap back.
Was binging 2 year old HauteLeMode videos then refreshed my page and realized we've been blessed with a new video
blair waldorf would've worn this... in 2008...
(btw i'm French and your pronunciation of French words is so cute i can't🤧🤧🤧🤧)
Most Americans would not even try to do an accent XD it’s how we are. It’s impressive to me and sounds good to ignorant Americans
I don’t know why I want to blame influencers, but somehow some way I think this is partially their fault.
this collection needed a HUGE edit. so many looks would have worked without the leggings. and terrible shoes
Last time I was this early Dolce wasn’t problematic
underrated comment
I would've LOVED to see the historical silhouettes and the lavish hair pieces of the 16th century rather than this. They had soooooo much potential with the theme and the setting😫
Pausing a year old Haute Le Mode video to come and watch the new one ASAP
it looks like they bought tights and bodysuits in bulk from fashion nova I hate it here
This collection is largely awful. A couple of great pieces and a lot of bad stuff (and those tights - so unattractive!)
Those leggings are absolutely tragic.
A bomber or puffer in the Chanel tweed would be fire
Last time I was this early it was 2020. It’s 2069420 at this point and Quarantine is still not over
Lol so true 😂😂💀💀
these tights give every look they’re paired with a ‘tween girl in 2007’ vibe and I don’t think anyone wants to be brought back there
The leggings ruined every single look wtf
There were a couple looks at the beginning that I thought they were cute with, but they got old really fast.
Literally a pair of dark tights to give a streamlined look would have saved most of them.
To be honest, I liked the collection... (ignoring the tights) The collection felt different in some weird way and I’m just glad it’s not 800 tweed jackets.
Same
Yes, I don’t understand people who feel so strongly about it, it was beautiful. Those last few years Chanel has been so lazy « oh here, take some tweed jackets pearl necklaces and black dresses that look like Chanel’ boarding school uniform » At least this one is surprising and inspiring
Me too
Yeah I liked it too. it seemed to not take itself too seriously. I liked the whole weird styling/quirky vibe
It was something different for Chanel
*karl punching the air in heaven rn*
You mean hell...
@@sosopeople9157 What’d he do
I fainted when I saw this collection
i'm assuming it wasn't the good kind of fainting :/
@@hautelemode you would be correct
And clutching my pearls!
I hate myself for wanting the cone princess hat thing in the thumbnail. Fashion gods, escort me out off of this planet, I do not deserve to walk here.
Death, it's one of the biggest events that will ever take place in your life. We face death everyday, conscious or unconsciously of it; death lurks around every corner of our life. Like a lion waiting to catch its prey, death comes for us all in many shapes and form; seemingly there is no one who can escape from the jaws of death.
But did you know there is a reason why we die? The idea of death you're familiar with is only the tip of the iceberg. See we die because we've sinned against God. Death according to the bible is wages " for the wages of sin is death " (Romans 6:23).
Because man sinned against God, we live in a fallen world, it was once perfect, but now in ruins. Now that sin exists, God is coming to judge the world In righteousness. It's appointed a man once to die and after this judgement" (Hebrews 9:27) The standard he'll judge you by is the 10 commandments, God's moral law.
He's so serious about sin that he gave anyone who sins the death sentence, the bible says you've earned it through sinning against God and each time you sin you build up his wrath. “The soul who sins shall die.” (Ezekiel 18:4) The punishment is the eternal fires of Hell " Where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth" (Matthew 13:42)
You will have to face God on Judgement Day.
Will you go to Heaven or Hell?
Here’s a quick test:
1-You shall have no other gods before me. 2-You shall not make any idols. 3-You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain. 4-Remember the Sabbath Day. 5-Honor your father and mother. 6-You shall not murder. 7-You shall not commit adultery. 8-You shall not steal. 9-You shall not lie. 10-You shall not covet.
Have you ever told a lie? stolen anything? used God’s name in vain? have you ever looked at anyone with lust? He sees lust as adultery, “Whoever looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”(Matthew 5:28) Have you ever hated someone? he sees hatred as murder, ”Anyone who hates another brother or sister is a murderer, (1 John 3:15)
James 2:10 says, “the person who keeps all of the laws except one is as guilty as a person who has broken all of God’s laws.”
Don't rely on your own goodness or good works to save you. That's like bribing God to let you into heaven; Nor a church, pastor, priest, or any religion. None of us are good at all, even murderers, rapists, even Hilter will call themselves Good and they'll try to justify themselves by their Good works. But the bible says:
• "But we are all like an unclean thing, and all of our righteousnesses are like filthy rags; we fade as a leaf, and our iniquities, like wind have taken us away." (Isaiah 64:6)
God's definition of good is morally excellent and therefore he demands absolute pperfections. No one can ever match his standards. That's why Jesus said: • " No one is good except God alone." (Luke 18:19)
If you have done any of those things, God sees you as guilty of breaking His law and the Bible warns that the guilty will end up in Hell. Will YOU be guilty on Judgement Day?
"For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." (Romans 6:23)
God sent His Son to suffer and die on the cross. Jesus took the punishment upon Himself and defeated death on the cross; not because your Good but because God is rich in mercy.
“For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life.” (John 3:16)
Jesus rose from the dead and defeated death. Repent (turn from sin) today and trust in Jesus and God will grant you everlasting life; you'll also be born again.
He'll give you a new heart that desires righteousness, what is just and a heart that will love God.
that is why Jesus said "Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." (John 3:3)
Then, Read the Bible and obey what you read.
☆ When Are You Going To Get Right With God?
“Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts as you did in the rebellion“ (Hebrews 3:15) “Now is the accepted time, behold now is the day of salvation.” (2 Corinthians 6:2)
• " Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved." (Acts 4:12)
It's your choice. I'll leave you with this "What shall profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? " (Mark 8:36)
If you're taking this seriously, Would you like a prayer? This prayer is not a guarantee that you'll be saved, that's between you and God. However, I'd like this to be a good start for your journey.
"Father, I thank you for this person's open heart and ask that he/she would repent and trust alone in Jesus christ. I also ask that you guide their steps on their journey so that they would pass from death to life. In Jesus name amen.
When you get alone before God and repent (turn from your sins) of your sins. Use Psalm 51 as a model to help you.
When you find time please read this:
www.livingwaters.com/save-yourself-some-pain/
@@en4017 bruh
@Carne Guisada God gave you a conscience to know right from wrong so therefore he will judge your thought life, your every motives and even your words.
"But I tell you that for every careless word that people speak, they shall give an accounting for it in the day of judgement. For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned." (Matthew 12:36-37)
If you were to die in your sins and God gave you justice for breaking his law. You have his promise that he'll send you to Hell; God's prison without parole.
"all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone," (Revelation 21:8)
No thieves, blasphemers( Taking God's in vain is called blasphemy, punishable by death in the old testament and God holds no one guiltless who takes his name in vain), Adulterers, murderers will enter the kingdom of Heaven.
You either believe or reject the free gift of God that is in Jesus Christ. If you reject Jesus then your damned for hell. "You will perish unless you repent of yours sins and turn to God." (Luke 13:3) I am the way, the truth, and the life. no one comes to the father except through me (John 14:6) I encourage you to strongly think about what you've read because I love you and care about you. You could die in your sleep and end up in hell Neither me nor God wants that for you.
Listen to the fear you may have after reading this, you may think the fear you have is bad but it's actually your friend and , because it's trying to persevere you from ending up in Hell.
“It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.”
Hebrews 10:31
"And by the fear of the LORD one departs from evil."
Proverbs 16:6
I want it too 🥴
@@en4017 How long were you waiting to pull this speech out?
Look, I'm Catholic. Yet I find this to be incredibly obnoxious and I really don't like the implications towards the op. The op just made a joke (that I found funny). There was really no need for a sermon.
i HATE those gd tights. If you want tights, just make them go down to the feet, don’t make them weird leggings!!!
Honestly I didn’t mind this Chanel collection, I think it had really nice pieces but maybe the styling of clothes didn’t help to highlight it. Also the jumpsuits/tights under the clothes are distracting.
That’s the point collection is all good
It’s styling making problems
Chanel heard the 2000s are supposed to be in right now and took the absolute worst from the period, the tights and skirts combo.
Chanel needs to look back in the archives from the 90s for inspiration to garner a more youthful audience because not only are those collections amazing but they also still hold up trend wise today
There is this one episode of iCarly where one of the main characters, Freddie, takes a girl who is also a witch to prom and the look at 15:05 looks like an evolved version of that girl
They're legit catering the younger generation like WHAT WAS THAT????
If they want to cater to the younger generation they need to change up their silhouettes and experiment with materials and exaggerate what they are referencing.
It’s honestly a breath of fresh air that an influencer understands fashion and speaks so well on the subject. Reviews not influenced by a purse or other gifts. The reviews in vogue and wwd are what we would all wait for..... I miss those days! Thank you!
OMG the styling strained my eyes. the leggings. THE LEGGINGS, I’m going to cry and the necklaces did not gooo
i would love to see you do a video about the fashion in A Queen's Gambit!
I like the fact that the colors are not "loud". I thought this collection will be better than the previous one but it's not, sadly. I appreciate the inspiration of the chateau to the accessories though.
14:50 'Normally, the Chanel chiffon looks that are another standard trope of the brand... *disgust me personally* '
I'm LIVING for these reads
17:46 LIVING for the wide-brim black hat on the sleek all-black look (although would be better without the leggings or tights or whatever they are). YES we are bringing witch vibes into 2021 babeyyyyy!
luke: *aggresively* WHO wears vests?!
I feel guilty that I legit liked most of these outfits
Don’t everyone has their preferences.
don’f feel guilty fashion is subjective and I thought this collection was surprising but inspiring
Everyone commenting on the leggings but failing to realize most ppl now a days live in and swear by their active apparel. This is a nod to the continuing trend and shift to a much more comfortable, less fussy pant and life style we all are after especially during this time of stay at home orders. The collection is highly contextual in its past and current happenings while still remaining true to and to the evolution of the house of Chanel. Virginie is doing a incredible of job of shifting the house to be much more relevant and real- while keeping true to the foundations Chanel is known for. The styling and use of accessories in this show was so beautiful and meticulously crafted helping to further tell this Château de Dames story.
seems this collection is taking inspo from when i was 7 with the leggings under shorts and skirts so i could play on the climbing frame...
When to use leggins:
- if you are a teenager who wants to wear a short dress/skirt and your parent say nope...
- if it's freezing and you need to put winter leggins under your clothe to warm yourself
- sport or staying home
The tights KILL ME 😩 20:53 to 23:37 I actually really enjoyed those pieces. The lattice dress was beautiful.
i don’t know about y’all but i’ve always wanted a tweed bodysuit! my thighs never chafe enough 😩 thanks virginie!
I love seeing Chanel collections. The factory that supplies many of the unique tweed fabrics to Chanel is in my city and I pass it almost every day
It’s even worse when you think about the eye-watering prices of these pieces
I actually really like that black peacock feather knit jumper and out of the collection, aS a yOuNg PeRsOn, I wanted that the most. It looks cozy, slightly haute goth, and very wearable with a pair of cropped demin trousers in black, a pearly chain belt and some DMs. Nothing else really seems worth it at least to me
You are hilarious!! You were so nice and this collection did not deserve it! I also think you are a not so subtle historian! I appreciate that you frame your commentary in history.
Thanks for highlighting the Chanel Métiers d'Art. My sister who is a experienced plumassière started her career at Lemarié. I thought you might want to know that it does not pronounce "Lew-Mare" (as in Christophe Lemaire) but "Lew-Ma-Ree-Ay" (as in Le Marié, French for "The Groom").
Conclusion leave the 80s in the 80s...
Also that hat shade was on point 👏
Those leggings were the biggest disappointment in this entire collection. It even ruined some decent looking pieces !!
I think you've got a real sharp voice and everything you said is so relatable to this collection.
I just want to say that I undestand your point but also , chanel is desingned for rich people and most of them are lets say "mature" . I liked when things were classy and i feel sad that critics push brands like this to be "trendy" , just let them be authentic
Luke's waist looking snatched in this look
This entire collection is such a mess 😭
Thank you! I thought this was truly horrible but all the comments I could see under the video were overwhelmingly positive - I was like whaaaat
Omgosh the conical hat but as highly decorated purse 👀 ✨fun purse reference ✨
this!!!!
❤️❤️
The Tweed diapers remind me of Lynda Carter's (as Wonder Woman) bottoms from the 70s and how padded they were
i’ve been waiting for this. i also had no words
My favourite outfit was at 9:48 and then luke tore it to shreds 😭 I loved it, the bottom half especially!
I also liked it. And I actually really appreciate that he said it’s « subjectively horrible ». Haha, I absolutely love it when people use the correct words :)
the footless tights ruin everything they touch
edit: "nothing of interest and only of disgust" made me CACKLE
Loved this review! Completely agree that the styling was awful (those bodysuits) and only distracted from the collection. I like VV so I’m hopeful she’ll get better once she stops trying to appease the new and older customers at the same time
I really dislike the jumpsuit underneath the clothing. It just completely made me cringe. I like the checkerboard on some pieces and the jewelry. Makeup is done simplistically well.
I’m living for your fashion reviews / roast’s 💯 and Quite saddened to hear that you won’t be doing them much anymore as l enjoy your take on them so much and I live for all The fashion history that you add, thank you for all that you are doing loveing it! ❤️🙏🏼
I honestly can never see these runways as full outfits, they're all just like weird combinations of clothing that just makes me think of it as two walking clothing racks that are on top of each other for no reason whatsoever, solely because the retailers organize their clothing in such a manner
those blue leggings had me.... 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Total disappointment
Didnt see any wearable look nor piece, aside from the sweatshirts that rich kids are able to afford to wear as “lounge wear” 😅🙄
KS decorously observing the show on behalf of everyone is a mood.
The problem for me is that I don´t know who this Chanel woman is. Like ok, she has money but is she young (like in her 20s or 30s) or older? Plus also I miss the joy and emotions, from the models and the clothes as well.
After this show you’ll never know who she is
The checkerboard patterns and those black pants that have been buttoned-up give me jester vibes.
Chanel's casting has also been giving me so much pause lately. They like REFUSE to start casting more diversely.
I actually like that checkerboard skirt (call me basic!) but it’s very basic for a luxury brand to be doing.. mostly because it was styled awfully with those tights ...
Didn’t know Shein had an haute-couture collection. Even a show! Bravo. I like this Shein’s new direction.
As a french speaker, your prononciation of the word "Chenonceau" as Chenonnio? hahahahahah I'm cackling . Thank you
Or Diane -> Dyone. I laughed my ass off 😂
Lol perpetuating the stereotype much?
Maybe the ‘legs’ will be her signature. People are asking her to both live up to KL and stir a brand in 2020 and keep sales up. I love this show
I actually like majority of the Chanel pieces 🙊 I just don’t like how they were styled on the runway
i wonder if they covered the legs because it was cold...but then i think they have enough money to get heaters , come on >>;;
Maybe they didn’t. Not have money but maybe they had trouble with heating. It’s an Old ass place, and it could’ve been having remodeling done and then it just wasn’t done in time for the show itself to be recorded so they had to do some modifications on the outfits ( I.e. the ill fitting jumpsuits”)
Oh come on, nobody thinks about these things in a fashion show...if the designer wants to put a model in a swimsuit in the middle of the winter, he will. Don’t try to justify these horrible fashion choices of Chanel 😛