Hugh Ross | Rescuing Inerrancy | Steve Brown, Etc.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 окт 2024

Комментарии • 34

  • @KeyLife
    @KeyLife  9 месяцев назад +1

    00:00 - Intro
    03:55 - Meet Hugh Ross
    05:46 - What is "Biblical Inerrancy"?
    09:41 - Dr. Ross' quest to prove the Bible wrong - and where it led him.
    13:40 - Why science backs up that Adam and Eve REALLY existed
    19:02 - "Bro, do you even science?!"
    22:48 - The ancients actually knew a LOT about astronomy
    29:47 - Why is important that Bible is inerrant?
    32:13 - Why getting inerrancy wrong unravels to 'pick and choose' Christianity
    34:37 - "We have to adjust what the Bible is saying about Adam and Eve..."
    37:36 - Steve's closing thoughts
    39:42 - Next week's guest is...

    • @believer7280
      @believer7280 9 месяцев назад

      The intro music lasts a bit too long.

  • @jeremywallis5414
    @jeremywallis5414 3 месяца назад

    You're a hero of the faith Hugh Ross!!! Thanks so much for your work!

  • @ChipsAplentyBand
    @ChipsAplentyBand 7 месяцев назад

    I'm so glad Hugh listened to the theologians who came to him and said "You've got to write this book!" It's a great book that's much needed and I gave out four copies to the elders at my church.

  • @Torby4096
    @Torby4096 9 месяцев назад +1

    When I was in High School Biology, ughh 50 years ago, I concluded, "The Bible is correct. If it looks like it is not, we must not understand what we are looking at." Hugh just said the same thing!

    • @gmac6503
      @gmac6503 9 месяцев назад

      Backwards

  • @paulschock531
    @paulschock531 Месяц назад

    Long time fan of Hugh Ross. All the way back to the late 70's, early 80's when his book, The Fingerprint of God, helped me defend the Bible to my liberal friends at Stanford. I'm new to Key Life Network, and loved your team and such, but I do have a question. After the many breaks, I felt like the program was WAY too short. I'm sure you have a good reason for this: what is it?
    Most of the apologetics content I listen to is around an hour, without many interruptions, which allows people like Hugh to go much deeper.
    I guess what I'm doing is criticizing you for making me like your show so much that I think it should be longer!

  • @kathykelly-ww1cl
    @kathykelly-ww1cl 9 месяцев назад

    😂😂 God's Word is pure, perfect in counsel, preparing Christians' hearts to abide in His infallible spoken Word.
    The Bible makes no mistakes as God doesn't speak junk to His children through His Word. What a blessing we still have in America to read the Bible as one day there will be a famine in the land where no one will be free to read and study God's Word. Those Christians who think the Bible is in error--they need to repent for their unbelief. 😢😢 Excellent commentary today. Thanks Steve and staff!!!

  • @Torby4096
    @Torby4096 9 месяцев назад

    Hahaha... Imagine future archeologists digging up copies of Inuyasha😂 The Bible is correct.

    • @gmac6503
      @gmac6503 9 месяцев назад

      If they had a clue they would at least desire to study the topic. William G Dever went on an archaeological exposition in hopes of showing bible proof and ended up finding the real truth - hence, he wrote _Has Archaeology Buried the Bible?_ and other books since then. Problem is these apologists just do not read the bible, scholars, peer-reviewed papers and have personalities of snotty kids. As 'someone' once said - or close to said hehe, "They can't handle the truth"

  • @gmac6503
    @gmac6503 9 месяцев назад +1

    Not one critical scholar in this episode. Imagine none of them having to deal with the scholarly consensus. Inerrancy? Hugh Ross is the man? Yeah, ok! He is qualified? hmm.
    Apologetics! Do anything you can to defend your conclusion and pick and choose and twist to make the square pegs fit into the round hole. Grind those corners down and jam it in even using a hammer if need be.

    • @MutsPub
      @MutsPub 9 месяцев назад

      Dr. Ross has 50+ years of experience as a PhD Astrophysicist (U of T 1973);
      40+ years of experience as a Pastor that supports the inerrancy of Scripture - 100%!! ;
      37+ years of experience (1986) as Founder and Former President of the “Reasons to Believe” (RTB) organization;
      Dr. Ross is part of the RTB team that currently has some 100+ PhD visiting scholars in Astronomy, Chemistry, Biology, Virology, Biochemistry, Paleontology, Cosmology, Physics, Anthropology, Geology, Astrophysics, Archaeology, Theology, Philosophy, Hebrew, Greek, Biblical hermeneutics, as well as, various other cross science and engineering disciplines, etc.;
      Author of 22+ books;
      5 year postdoctoral research fellow at Caltech (1973-1978);
      Dr. Ross has taught as an adjunct faculty member at A. W. Tozer Seminary, Regent University, and Southern Evangelical Seminary;
      Dr. Ross has lectured at over 400 Churches around the world;
      Dr. Ross was the Winner of the Texas A&M Trotter prize in 2012;
      The Trotter Prize is awarded at Texas A&M University and is part of an endowed lecture series. It is awarded "for pioneering contributions to the understanding of the role of information, complexity and inference in illuminating the mechanisms and wonder of nature" and includes The Trotter Lecture which "seeks to reveal connections between science and Religion often viewed in academia as non-overlapping, if not rival, worldviews;
      Dr. Ross has lectured at over 300 Universities around the world!

    • @gmac6503
      @gmac6503 9 месяцев назад +1

      @@MutsPub yeah, I already knew that. I have a few of his books. Your response didn't address what I said so just go back to what you were doing and disregard what other people say so you can blurt out some nonsense and some so-called credentials. I would mention why Ross believes in a God and his reasons for it which are nonsense but I'm not gonna waste my time with you so keep sticking up for your apologists and ignore the scholars. Bye.

    • @gmac6503
      @gmac6503 9 месяцев назад +1

      @@MutsPub so what! You totally went on a rant, while the topic is the innerancy of scripture which he didn't have any evidence for, and then you mentioned his other credentials, which have nothing to do with the topic. What the hell do you people do all day? He's an apologist. That's my whole point. He's not a biblical scholar. Wake up and stop the nonsense of having to defend your apologists with credentials that have nothing to do with proving innerancy of scripture. The inerrancy of scripture it's just plain ignorant. That was my whole point and you didn't do anything to refute me and neither did he say anything in the video worthwhile on the topic

    • @MutsPub
      @MutsPub 9 месяцев назад +1

      @@gmac6503 Comprehension is not your forte?
      Your expertise is what, RUclipsTrollology?
      How embarrassing!

    • @MutsPub
      @MutsPub 9 месяцев назад

      @@gmac6503 Ah, the deluded rantings of another ill-educated Mr. Knowitall RUclipsologist malcontent poser.
      You fantasize that in some distorted way you are actually his intellectual superior! - Hilarious!
      Please enlighten us all.
      Which came first, sea animals or land plants?