F-35 DAS

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 янв 2025

Комментарии • 393

  • @RocketPropelledGuy
    @RocketPropelledGuy Год назад +39

    Most advanced fighter ever, but it appears Northrop Grumman made the commercial in the 90's. All we're missing is a couple of freeze frames

    • @alexv3357
      @alexv3357 Год назад +5

      The core design of the fighter was finalised in the late 90s, so that's not wrong

    • @jurajsintaj6644
      @jurajsintaj6644 Год назад +2

      Eh, one would assume that creating modern, high end, beautiful commercials for military equipment isnt very high up on the priority list.

    • @PlayWaves1
      @PlayWaves1 День назад

      This video is from 2010 before HD was common on Yotube.

  • @northropgrummanmedia
    @northropgrummanmedia  12 лет назад +65

    Thanks to all our viewers for helping us reach more than 900,000 views!

    • @GiftedFestiveBee
      @GiftedFestiveBee 4 года назад +3

      DAS pretty cool!

    • @rogyrulles4137
      @rogyrulles4137 4 года назад

      hehehe u have job for Software Engineer??? LMAO

    • @ВЛАДИМИРШ-б6й
      @ВЛАДИМИРШ-б6й 4 года назад

      a cartoon that has nothing to do with the real truth of air combat

    • @bq1000bq
      @bq1000bq 3 года назад +6

      @@ВЛАДИМИРШ-б6й When's your Su-57 Pak Fa Talon going to start mass production? In real life, not cartoon animation?

    • @excaliber8794
      @excaliber8794 3 года назад +1

      Jesus it took you 8 years to get twice the views

  • @ThomasLee123
    @ThomasLee123 5 лет назад +21

    The Electro Optical - Distributed Aperture System - DAS is a fantastic addition to pilot awareness. This advancement helps all F-15 pilots do what only the best of the best have been have been able to accomplish in the past. It, essentially, makes our entire pilot compliment into 100% top gun level operators.
    Distributed Aperture refers to the ability of the F-15 computer to take information from sensors around the aircraft and convert is into a 3-d environment similar to the Virtual Reality available in many games these days. F-15 Pilots are able to see all areas of the combat environment including below and to the rear of the aircraft as though the aircraft was invisible. (To DAS and its pilot, it is.) The difference is that DAS is real live data that gives the pilot immediate knowledge of the wartime environment of the jet aircraft. Top Gun level pilots have been able to do some of this in their heads by interpreting visual and instrument cues in their brain. Now all pilots have this ability.

    • @c-g9375
      @c-g9375 5 лет назад +1

      Thomas Lee U most be aware that were ECW come in to play by receiving information admitting aircraft dail in on data then counter measures is applied.

  • @DIEXEL
    @DIEXEL 14 лет назад +152

    Northrop!
    You are a multi billion corporation and can't have your videos in HD!?

    •  5 лет назад +4

      The computer doesn't need hd hd is for entertainment remember that

    • @kunalmahajan9489
      @kunalmahajan9489 4 года назад +17

      Lmao, what a crack. But I've seen some Music videos from 2010 or before with same quality

    • @SherlockHolmes-bc1hv
      @SherlockHolmes-bc1hv 3 года назад +4

      Lol

    • @Rudenbehr
      @Rudenbehr Год назад +7

      HD was kinda hard in 2010 on RUclips.

    • @jurajsintaj6644
      @jurajsintaj6644 Год назад +5

      @@Rudenbehr And the video might have been even older than that. It was only uploaded on youtube in 2010. And, of course, making their product commercial that are getting released to the public HD probably isnt their top priority

  • @darren1093
    @darren1093 3 года назад +12

    That is very frightening what it's capabilities are , it's amazing

    • @patewing5808
      @patewing5808 2 года назад

      only thing is in reality it is not going to work and DAS system is nightmare so unreliable

    • @jurajsintaj6644
      @jurajsintaj6644 Год назад +2

      @@patewing5808 And, I assume that you are senior engineer at Northrop Grumman for you to be so certain about such a system? Or do you have a F-35 pilot or technician as a friend who shares classified information about cutting edge systems?

    • @patewing5808
      @patewing5808 Год назад

      @@jurajsintaj6644 Kid I am more then qualified to talk about F-35 then you can imagine . Degree and 40 years of experience in radio physics . So called " stealth " and diffraction phenomena is something I do . Let me tell you something about US military complex . It is purpose is profit not defense of US . The people who write about this stuff in the popular ‘science’ and ‘technology’ media have absolutely NO scientific knowledge or professional credentials whatsoever…they simply repeat the nonsense they are told by various publicists working for the defense industry, and have no proper scientific education to tell what is plausible and what is not…The buzzword ‘fifth generation’ is completely meaningless…it is just a gimmick dreamed up by PR people in the US defense industry in order to create hype among the uneducated and clueless public, so that these companies, like Boeing and Lockheed, can get massive amounts of taxpayer cash for completely unreal and unscientific stuff like so-called ‘stealth’…
      It’s a magic money machine, based on parlor trickery, and that’s all…

  • @northropgrummanmedia
    @northropgrummanmedia  11 лет назад +33

    • @ИванИванов-я7т5о
      @ИванИванов-я7т5о 9 лет назад +1

      Хорошая аэродинамика самолетов, но технологии, воздушные суда, транспортные средства были изменены.А по аэродинамическому принципу строительства самолетов, вино самотеком с помощью новых физических законов.То, что сейчас скрывается за словами НЛО или летающая тарелка-это только приложение силы тяжести технологии, с набором новых функций для физических.Невидимость для радаров и невидимости в видимом спектре видимости,в то же время, способность летать в пространстве и во времени. Скоростные характеристики гравитационных самолетов, просто не доступны военных самолетов, в том числе и F-.35

    • @ИванИванов-я7т5о
      @ИванИванов-я7т5о 9 лет назад

      Good aerodynamics of the aircraft, but the technology, aircraft, vehicles have been modified.And on the aerodynamic principle of the construction of the aircraft, the wine is by gravity with the help of new physical laws.What now lies behind the words UFO or flying saucer-this is only the application of gravity technology with a set of new features for the physical.Invisibility to radar and invisible in the visible spectrum of visibility,at the same time, the ability to fly in space and in time. Speed characteristics of gravity of the aircraft, just not available for military aircraft, including F-35.

    • @РенатРоссия-ь3е
      @РенатРоссия-ь3е 5 лет назад

      Все эти ваши мультфильмы всего лишь желания. В реальности эти самолёты способны воевать только с противником у которого нет систем ПВО и современных самолётов истребителей! Посмотрите как Израиль не может применить ваши самолёты потом что у Сирии есть системы ПВО...
      А все мультфильмы где F35 уничтожает российские С400 это просто фантастика!!!

    • @DOD_2111
      @DOD_2111 10 месяцев назад

      @@РенатРоссия-ь3еpropagandaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    • @DOD_2111
      @DOD_2111 10 месяцев назад

      @@РенатРоссия-ь3еhow come su-35 got shot down 💀

  • @girlsforstemusa970
    @girlsforstemusa970 4 года назад +3

    Thank you for all you do

  • @EstablishedFlight
    @EstablishedFlight 3 месяца назад +1

    Why tf did I get recommended to this video 14 YEARS LATER

  • @MrLeet71
    @MrLeet71 4 года назад +15

    This system has been improved and will be installed on attack helicopters as well.. I'm sure the super Hornets and other aircraft will also be getting the systems and share targeting data and other information

  • @Champ1964
    @Champ1964 14 лет назад +4

    DAS seems to be a insightful deterrent for future enemy threats. Not that we are currently being threatened, but for those who wish to challenge, may think twice. For those too ignorant to understand the need to be on top, This Technology will also leak down toward other products that make our world safer in all forms of transportation. I applaud DAS.. and recommend a song for use during exercises. put some Flare on it and call it DAZZ from the Music of Brick 1976. lol

  • @youtert
    @youtert 10 лет назад +154

    I hope the DAS has better resolution than this video.

  • @ragingbull8024
    @ragingbull8024 8 лет назад +16

    DAS my boy,go F-35.

  • @Dragon029
    @Dragon029 13 лет назад +2

    @atmodom What happens when the Typhoon or Rafale has its radar jammed? DAS is only one of multiple targeting systems on the F-35; for off-bore radar tracking, the F-35 has the AN/ASQ-239 electronic warfare radar suite and for forward / long range target tracking the APG-81 AESA radar in the nose. That's 2 systems providing 360 degree tracking and 3 tracking within an angle inside the forward hemisphere.

  • @simulacra7885
    @simulacra7885 2 года назад +7

    The military industrial complex is fucking rad we need to double the defense budget

  • @danbrown4781
    @danbrown4781 6 лет назад +1

    Gotta say thats pretty fckn impressive and to consider that there are many more classified secrets to this thing maybe it really doesn't need to get in a dogfight afterall

  • @normanelison
    @normanelison 8 месяцев назад +2

    wow I didn t know this company has a youtube account maybe I gotta check lockheed martin and boeing too

  • @JorgeGamaliel
    @JorgeGamaliel 10 лет назад +16

    Trigonometry everywhere. Trigonometry, Spherical Trigonometry, Euler Angles, Trigonometric Equations, Delaunay triangulation, Propulsion Systems, Chemical reactions, Turbines, Fluid Mechanics, Aerodynamics, The Boundary Layer Theory, Quantum Dots, Nanotechnology,... etc etc. In fact The Air Force is lot of Physics and Mathematics :D

  • @vladislavsheer1977
    @vladislavsheer1977 7 лет назад

    Here there is something non-human: it is worth to detain attention in this miracle, and it is already impossible to tear yourself away from admiration. It's exactly the same as falling in love!

  • @tobylicious494
    @tobylicious494 9 лет назад +47

    I would say I feel sorry for our enemies but- no; I don't feel sorry for them.

    • @casey19660
      @casey19660 5 лет назад +5

      @landry KAMGA bwahahaha yea whatever moron.

    • @giko2556
      @giko2556 5 лет назад +1

      nice cartoon for "good night kids" ha ha ha - if you're so strong try it-cowboys

  • @ИванИванов-я7т5о
    @ИванИванов-я7т5о 8 лет назад

    In creating the aircraft experienced a technical revolution to change the aerodynamic principle of the creation of aircraft which is used to create planes came gravity.Eliminated the need for the wings in jet engines running on kerosene and in many other ways.

  • @mattm57
    @mattm57 5 лет назад +6

    At 4:24 they were targeting vehicles around Angels Stadium 😳

  • @lastsion20
    @lastsion20 13 лет назад +2

    HOLY S*(T !!!! Why didn't we have this when I was flying for the Navy? All I can say is " AWESOME " !!!!!!

  • @eugenedowling7380
    @eugenedowling7380 5 лет назад +3

    Nice!

  • @themewong7479
    @themewong7479 2 года назад +2

    I love das so much it’s give me sense
    of security

  • @justinalevi9038
    @justinalevi9038 5 лет назад +1

    You forgot two vay firewalls. Like to listen to the commercial for Kaspersky

  • @jdouglasusn
    @jdouglasusn 13 лет назад +1

    @BoxyTheSpaceDog "why aren't new Russian planes shown in the video,like Su-30Mk2,Su-35.Mig-35?"
    Because this video isn't about those.

  • @Wat-Dat
    @Wat-Dat 2 года назад +1

    Let your missiles do the turning

  • @BoleDaPole
    @BoleDaPole 3 года назад

    Sold. id like to buy a dozen, hit me up in the PMs
    Do u ship to afrika?

  • @Gunni1972
    @Gunni1972 5 лет назад +3

    have you figured out how to eliminate double imaging on the hud, when more than one sensor picks up the same signal? Or are the Pilots still turning it off?

    • @howardstover4641
      @howardstover4641 5 лет назад +2

      Gunni1972 You trying to prove how much you know? Not impressed

    • @osakanone
      @osakanone 2 года назад +2

      Its just a dot product of forward vector of vector location of helmet vs vector location of hud. If it scores >0.75f, the DAS linear interpolates its opacity from 100% to 0% as it nears 0.90f. Literally every fighter with a HMD does this and has for the last 20 years.

  • @fentonreese6935
    @fentonreese6935 8 лет назад +2

    Awesome

  • @timmcquearysr5270
    @timmcquearysr5270 10 лет назад +4

    this coupled with the 100 kilo laser, nothing could hit it. save the missiles for some thing else! it could take out every ground and air target in a extremely short amount of time. the only nee for missiles are large fortified targets? ( bunkers ect.) tanks ect. can be taken out with laser! missiles would be for well over the horizon targets??

    • @scythelord
      @scythelord 9 лет назад

      tim mcquearysr There exists no laser currently that could be effective against bunkers or tanks. Especially none that can be airborne. A tank would take ridiculous amounts of time for a laser to have an affect on it.

    • @AbsurdJosh
      @AbsurdJosh 9 лет назад

      +scythelord I think he means against SAMs.

    • @ermaclenista2259
      @ermaclenista2259 5 лет назад

      Laser might can't
      But don't be so idiotic guys u.s had a lot of kinds of weapons on its weaponry
      Don't be dumb...

  • @Retroscoop
    @Retroscoop 6 лет назад +5

    1) Do only US F 35's have the best DAS (or also the Israeli ones, those of the NATO countries that want to buy the F 35 or already have signed a contract ?
    2) How does DAS make a distinction between militairy trucks, ambulances, militairy trucks disguised as ambulances etc. ?
    3) Can't DAS be countered by new ECM leaving the multi million system virtually blind ? Add that prospect together with better and more mobile radars and the main advantages of the whole expensive packet might be gone through the drain before very long. Don't forget the plane is supposed to last for the next 30 years. That are quite a number of years either to catch up via spionage and own R&D or to developed effective counter measures.
    4) Isn't it such a complex system, that it will be "out" every two weeks, resulting in far too many F 35's in repair ?

    • @twocansams6335
      @twocansams6335 2 года назад +1

      DAS is just infrared cameras placed around the jet, to defeat das you would have to defeat a infrared camera.

    • @jurajsintaj6644
      @jurajsintaj6644 Год назад

      1) If there are going to be upgrades to the DAS system that are hardware upgrades, its likely that the US will receive them first, simply by the nature of it being the main producer of the system. Other nations will most likely slowly receive the upgrade as well, of course.
      2) The combination of radar, the much larger IR camera on a swivel under the turret, and the DAS create a relatively high definition picture of the target. I am pretty sure theres a demonstration somewhere on youtube, Ill try to find it. But at that point, its up to the pilot to decide. Also disguising military equipment as medical/civilian while its a combatant its a warcrime.
      3)No. DAS is a collection of IR cameras. To jam it, you would practically need to do the equivalent of pointing an IR flashlight at the plane, which would be really short range. And to do that, you would also need to find and track the aircraft. And it can also use the radar to detect ground targets.
      4) It is not a complex system hardware wise, as it is just IR cameras. It is complex digitally, however. Digital bugs may occur, but fixes can be done quickly, to every single F-35 at once, instantly.

  • @musiomusio3848
    @musiomusio3848 5 лет назад +1

    Identify the reality on the battlefield

  • @cannrickyf14
    @cannrickyf14 11 лет назад +4

    Look awesome and impresive, only I hope that the President and Congrees dont cut buget to this full F-35 program because then will be handicap and crap F-35. If some dont know yet, the F-22 Raptor had cuts as Helmet Vision hud meanwhile in 2008 the Typhoon was testing their Helmet Hud in Nellis A Base, Red Flag exercices.

    • @Gunni1972
      @Gunni1972 5 лет назад

      no i hope they pour another 1.5 trillions in it, before calling it a dud. that will teach lockheed to make planes, that actually deliver what they promise, on time.

  • @Thrax005
    @Thrax005 14 лет назад +1

    Can I get a job at Northrpgrumman you guys.

  • @cannrickyf14
    @cannrickyf14 11 лет назад +2

    This F-35 advanse hight technology look awesome and impresive but I hope that the President or Congress dont reduce buget to this full program because then will be a handicap F-35 as was the measure to F-22 Helmet Raptor replacing the Hud display.

    • @davidsalcido383
      @davidsalcido383 5 лет назад

      cannricky Perez: “ The $2 Trillion 💰🍋JSF-35 promises everything but delivers Little more than more profits to McDonald-Douglas’ War Profiteers?!!!”

  • @mehran808
    @mehran808 5 лет назад +8

    f-35 not only can destroy all target on air and graund-
    on earth but also on mars and venus too

    • @c-g9375
      @c-g9375 5 лет назад

      jasem adodi u a file🤗

    • @mehran808
      @mehran808 5 лет назад

      toro khoda nega ham vatanaye ma

    • @giko2556
      @giko2556 5 лет назад

      and throughout the galaxy as well hahahahahahahahahahahahah

    • @giko2556
      @giko2556 5 лет назад

      cowboys suck

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 10 месяцев назад

      Hey! They haven't built missiles that can reach QUITE that distance while being portable!

  • @ObstinateFanatic
    @ObstinateFanatic 13 лет назад +1

    @atmodom 2:15, that's what happens.
    Also, 'flying cow' is an inaccurate description, in the September 2011 issue of Airforces Monthly they had this to say "... in terms of manoeuvrability the F-35 will be cleared to 50° angle of attack, similar to the F/A-18 Hornet, with a full load of munitions inside."
    Also, manoeuvrability may not be as important as you think it is, most modern air-to -air engagements tend to be at long range where the F-35's advanced systems make it lethal.

  • @noelpura4223
    @noelpura4223 2 года назад

    Amazing 🤯

  • @denesse03
    @denesse03 11 лет назад +1

    This is the reason why the F-35 is so expensive! so high tech for your money to carry! expensive gadgets always better than cheap ones! like cellphones!

    • @Gunni1972
      @Gunni1972 5 лет назад +1

      i hope it gets so expensive, congress refuses to buy it.

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 10 месяцев назад

      ​@@Gunni1972 Hah, too late, they signed the contract and the planes are being delivered, world wide in fact!

    • @mikeakersa8566
      @mikeakersa8566 2 месяца назад

      ​@@Gunni1972Not only did Congress buy it, but over 1000 units have been made

  • @phoenixdoubledeuce
    @phoenixdoubledeuce 13 лет назад

    @Air2air1 you forgot 2add that the f35 is a nato joint strike fighter program

  • @juanproductosdivinamedina9850
    @juanproductosdivinamedina9850 5 лет назад +1

    Excelente infomaciones

  • @shaind
    @shaind 11 лет назад +1

    Simple EO-IR, which is neither integrated nor giviging 360 degree coverage, is no compared to EODAS.

  • @scottlucidi6476
    @scottlucidi6476 5 лет назад +1

    Russia is like "can u rewind that, please?"
    China is like "copy that"

  • @louie55ish
    @louie55ish 8 лет назад +17

    Scrap the 35, install DAS on the 22.
    Then you yanks will truly have a world beater like the 15/16 was in the 70s/80s.

    • @Nicolas-hf8wl
      @Nicolas-hf8wl 8 лет назад

      DUH of course The F-22 already has it too

    • @louie55ish
      @louie55ish 8 лет назад +3

      Er... No it doesn't. It has the MLD

    • @Nicolas-hf8wl
      @Nicolas-hf8wl 8 лет назад

      louie55ish which is basically the same thing FACEPALM

    • @Gunsncarsnstuff
      @Gunsncarsnstuff 8 лет назад

      +Nicolas Nope

    • @4CatsGuy
      @4CatsGuy 7 лет назад +2

      I totally agree -- scrap the F-35 and install the Electro Optical Distributed Aperture System (DAS) on the FA-18E/F Super Hornet. The unfortunate F-35 is a complete lemon, and will, no doubt, go down as one of the greatest failures in aviation history. The F-35 began its development as the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) in 1992 -- Yes, 25 years ago!!! Yet Initial Operational Capability (IOC) has only very recently been declared in the USMC and USAF in very corrupt testing schemes. And Full Operational Capability (FOC) has not been attained by any service's F-35s, and won't be for quite some time. That means the F-35 remains not fully combat ready. It still has a laundry list of unresolved significant problems, yet over 200 F-35s have now rolled off the assembly lines. That means that all current, and many future F-35s will need extensive rework. At least the Navy has had the good sense to not embrace the F-35, and to purchase the failed aircraft in very limited numbers, as politically required. It is quite clear that the F-35 will be THE LAST aircraft that will be developed for all three flying branches (Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps), and the F-35 program is nothing short of being an albatross/white elephant, and complete waste, fraud, and abuse to United States' and participating countries' taxpayers.

  • @stephtt1984
    @stephtt1984 5 лет назад

    I believe Northrop Grumman since they are succses build Bomber B-52 Spirit

    • @asianhawk303
      @asianhawk303 5 лет назад +1

      Not b52 but B2, b52 is boeing

  • @ace7_skies_unknown207
    @ace7_skies_unknown207 3 года назад +1

    Meanwhile chinese:✍✍✍✍

  • @РенатРоссия-ь3е
    @РенатРоссия-ь3е 5 лет назад +1

    Все эти ваши мультфильмы всего лишь желания. В реальности эти самолёты способны воевать только с противником у которого нет систем ПВО и современных самолётов истребителей! Посмотрите как Израиль не может применить ваши самолёты потом что у Сирии есть системы ПВО...
    А все мультфильмы где F35 уничтожает российские С400 это просто фантастика!!!

    • @giko2556
      @giko2556 5 лет назад

      cowboys ate crazy mushrooms-ковбои ели сумасшедшие грибы

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 10 месяцев назад

      Alright buddy. Stay in your S400 truck while a HARM comes your way without you even knowing...

  • @newhampshirelifestyle4233
    @newhampshirelifestyle4233 3 года назад

    This technology needs to be deployed at the US-Mexico border.

  • @iamscoutstfu
    @iamscoutstfu 3 года назад

    Civilian planes could use a limited version of this.

  • @studentloans2488
    @studentloans2488 Год назад

    R&D budget: 421 billion USD
    Animation budget: 200 bucks

  • @giko2556
    @giko2556 5 лет назад

    nice cartoon for "good night kids" ha ha ha - if you're so strong try it-cowboys

  • @LesserPandaVT
    @LesserPandaVT 6 дней назад +1

    Hello fellow dcs enjoyers

  • @judaoverduin2273
    @judaoverduin2273 8 лет назад +4

    Does it have i7 processor?

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 7 лет назад

      It has PowerPC base CPU instead.

    • @wombatlover2796
      @wombatlover2796 6 лет назад

      No, its using the 8088 chip set.. much more reliable !!!!

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 6 лет назад

      @@wombatlover2796 It's PowerPC with FPGA

  • @janegeary6013
    @janegeary6013 10 лет назад +9

    The shoot back missile has half the range of a shoot forward missile because it is expending extra fuel turning in ways conventional missiles do not, so it would only scare off a pursuer who's lining up for a gun kill. This is why 99% of missile fighting is moving your airplane into a position where the missile you're firing has to do the least amount of turning to hit the enemy (has the best kinematics).
    Modern SAM can fire on the move and detect in bands the F-35 isn't stealthy in, so DAS is a bit useless in that respect. Not to mention DAS is something plenty of other aircraft have (Gripen etc), it's not some new invention.
    Also DAS and reverse firing missiles can be installed on a WWII prop bomber, if they were so powerful as to make turning useless, why even pay hundreds of millions for a jet airframe?

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 9 лет назад +1

      +Jane Geary F-35 can detect SAM's missile launch can enable F-35 to counter attack. DAS has missile tracking capability.

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 7 лет назад

      The Russians has first nuke strike options.

  • @haridravanil4228
    @haridravanil4228 7 лет назад

    I have some doubt that how many dreams come to true in real life

    • @0MoTheG
      @0MoTheG 5 лет назад

      It is a matter of time. The software is under constant development.

  • @vlchhakchhuak607
    @vlchhakchhuak607 5 лет назад

    Why advertising other product..lockheed martin.?why gruman

  • @marauder247
    @marauder247 12 лет назад

    Too bad your information is hopelessly out of date. The BAE HMD is a backup that only addresses the jitter issues the VSI HMD had with night vision. The BAE HMD is on its way to being cancelled now that VSI has a grip on the jitter issues.

  • @SuperiorAmericanGuy
    @SuperiorAmericanGuy 9 лет назад +1

    So DAS will make the F-35 better or worst?

    • @theguy1633
      @theguy1633 9 лет назад +8

      +mrwong11989 DAS is the main reason the F-35 is built for the role its designated for.

    • @timblizzard4226
      @timblizzard4226 9 лет назад

      Homer Simpson What do you mean?

    • @edwardrodriguez4312
      @edwardrodriguez4312 7 лет назад

      Boeingemployee1989 with das,pilot can detect stealth fighters with own eyes when planes give off heat

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 7 лет назад

      Izno Iznogoud, that's BS.
      Rafale OSF’s IRST was a disappointment. The OSF-IT omitted the IR channel altogether. Some Rafale F3s supposedly were even delivered without the OSF. OSF-IT has detection range of 85 km on a clear day. OSF-IT is use for identification not for IR tracking
      *ODF-IT will be cued by radar, Spectra*, or Link-16.
      The twin IR channels present in the Rafale F2's OSF will be absent from the OSF-IT. Otherwise, it would have been necessary to address the obsolescence and performance issues affecting the IR portion of the Rafale F2's OSF that are today entering service. To sum it up, the OSF-IT will make do with the TV sensor. This system will be an improvement over the current one (but without an increase in range, since this would have required changing the focal mechanisms), which can already be cued by radar, Spectra, or Link-16, thus allowing it to detect aircraft at 85km, to separately distinguish the multiple aircraft in a flight at around 40km, and even to detect a formation break before it is seen on radar, which provides an undeniable advantage. Nevertheless, the absence of the dual-channel IR will de facto prevent passive air to air combat at night."
      From Technologie & Armement supplement of the June 2007 Air Power:

  • @sismofytter
    @sismofytter 5 лет назад +1

    Parts of this system is made by Therma in Denmark 🇩🇰

  • @raminabdeshahrei2661
    @raminabdeshahrei2661 5 лет назад +1

    I don’t think so 🤔

  • @dannywarchol3063
    @dannywarchol3063 5 лет назад

    Who is current Aopa President ? DW

  • @jamesmani5985
    @jamesmani5985 5 лет назад

    Good fighter
    But US may not ship to India as India Has S400 systems too

    • @casey19660
      @casey19660 5 лет назад

      No. Neither turkey nor india is getting them.

    • @jamesmani5985
      @jamesmani5985 5 лет назад

      @@casey19660 but Lockeed is started plant withTatas Indian MNC in South India to supply F21=F22 raptor For medium combat
      India seems hesitant on the deal

  • @papiyon66
    @papiyon66 5 лет назад +1

    Futuro hoy en la armada EEUU alucinante el poder armamentista .

    • @papiyon66
      @papiyon66 5 лет назад +1

      @@ciudadmafiosamafiacityarri1859 EEUU sigue siendo el número uno en tecnología y armamento civil y militar incluso se sostiene que tienen una red de naves espaciales en la órbita terrestre

  • @pepsico815
    @pepsico815 14 лет назад

    Seriously, how many air-to-air combat situations do we even encounter each year? What a huge waste of money.

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 10 месяцев назад

      Buddy. The thing can carry A2A missiles. And also the F-22 still exists, and the only reason there aren't more is Congress being stupid and forgetting price goes down the more something is produced.

  • @adrianwilliams8278
    @adrianwilliams8278 9 лет назад +3

    The only reason the f-35 will need off boar sight weapons is because it can't dogfight,maybe the U.S should just stick to SAMs

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 7 лет назад

      ruclips.net/video/Y4DWX-R8ME8/видео.html
      F-35A vs F-22A vs EF Turn.

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 6 лет назад

      ruclips.net/video/k3b-b762QRY/видео.html
      Super Hornet's high AoA+minimum turn radius advantage holding it's own against F-15's high energy turn rate advantage dogfight example
      Original source (non-English)
      suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/kotimaa/suomella-vahvat-ilmavoimat-mutta-kuinka-kauan/
      Frisian Flag 2012 exercises in Holland, Finnish F-18Cs gets 100 kills and 6 loses against Eurofighter (Germany, UK), Polish new F-16 and older F-16 planes (Norway, Belgium) and Gripen (Swedish)
      nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2015/11/20/a-fly-f-35-erfaringer-fra-den-forste-uka/
      More F-16 vs F-35 from Norwegian pilot.
      I quote
      _Overall, flying the F-35 reminds me a bit of flying the F/A-18 Hornet, but with an important difference: It has been fitted with a turbo_

  • @agustinusnukuboy8651
    @agustinusnukuboy8651 10 лет назад

    Kemampuan Teknologi EO-DAS Pesawat F-35 belum mampu dirancang oleh Tim KFX / IFX. Saya yang sudah mampu merancang Sistem EO-DAS yang setara dengan Sistem F-35 dalam Proyek Pesawat ANFX versi saya.
    Uji Terbang ini menunjukkan bahwa masih banyak seluk-beluk Teori Dasar dan Integrasi Sistem dan sinkronisasi perhitungan Mekanika Terbang yang lebih inovatif yang harus dikembangkan sendiri dalam perancangan. Jadi ini sudah bisa saya aplikasikan sejak 12 tahun yang lalu, sekarang makin saya sempurnakan saja.
    Tim KFX / IFX belum mampu, masih belajar berkreasi sampai tahun 2024 nanti, masih bodoh mereka. Presiden JOKOWI harus diingatkan tentang pemborosan anggaran pembangunan di Proyek KFX / IFX ini. Periksa kembali Master Plan-nya yang korup itu, ganti anggota Timnya yang masih lambat mikir, makan gaji buta dari negara.
    Saya sekarang punya validasi Design Requirement & Objective (DRO) dan data-data Kemampuan Tempur Pesawat ANFX rancangan saya yang sudah bisa dijual tahun 2015 ke Lockheed Martin untuk diintegrasikan dengan assembly Pesawat F-35, atau diproduksi secara tersendiri.

    • @mbahmoechannel3061
      @mbahmoechannel3061 10 лет назад

      Wah hebat bgt bapak ini sudah berani menandingi capabilities by Lockheed martin. Any avionics dalam f35 saja masih classified. Bapaknya sudah bisa menandingi millions codes super computer integrated f35..... Hebat bgt sampai aku tidak percaya

  • @dave96979
    @dave96979 5 лет назад +3

    The F35 isn't made for dog fights, so what good is this product?

    • @danzervos7606
      @danzervos7606 5 лет назад +12

      Watch the video again and it will answer your question.

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 10 месяцев назад

      And besides, for pure A2A there's always the beast that is the F-22.

  • @mohammedansari4071
    @mohammedansari4071 5 лет назад +3

    Best number one, s 400.

  • @mbahmoechannel3061
    @mbahmoechannel3061 10 лет назад +8

    Just a simulator. But in fact that scenario not so easy

    • @gibbsm
      @gibbsm 9 лет назад +1

      +Hendra Djokam it's powered by element 115 tho!

    • @louie55ish
      @louie55ish 8 лет назад

      +Matt Gibbs
      Holy shit, I nearly choked on my carot I was eating. Nice !

  • @thekeysersoze707
    @thekeysersoze707 10 лет назад

    There wasn't a lot of new tech here. This system isn't the only one that can provide over the shoulder shots at the enemy. I think SAAB can even do it with the Gripen.
    Plus i noticed one of the other fighter's was a SU27 and another a Euro fighter, so what your saying is no other country will be challenging with anything more than a fourth generation fighter jet in future?
    Plus all the SAM's were out in the open, a desert in one scene and a green empty field in another.
    I do not think their commander will be in charge for long.

    • @orlock20
      @orlock20 10 лет назад

      A lot of this technology is old. The Russians created the helmet mounted HUD, the Apache Guardian helicopter has all the sensors, stealth is based around the F-22 and the voice activated stuff is SIRI. I believe the F-35 is failing because there are literally hundreds of different contractors and sub contractors around the world making the parts for these things so there is a lot of room for corruption.

    • @Dominikmj
      @Dominikmj 9 лет назад +2

      +orlock20 This is a very naïve viewpoint. DAS ist completely different compared to a "basic" HUD. Yes - it all started with an HUD - but it is like saying, that the first IBM PC and a contemporary PC have the same capabilities - and while in theory they are - in reality they aren't!
      Your latter part of you analysis isn't an argument either. Yes - some of the delays and cost overruns happened due with it... but the whole program had to be restructured and since then made far better progress... and the F-35 is already fielded and deployed [even not with 100% of their final capabilities].

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 10 месяцев назад

      That's why the NGAD is already being worked on. And besides, I have yet to see a true fifth gen built by the ruskis or chinese.

  • @ИванИванов-я7т5о
    @ИванИванов-я7т5о 9 лет назад

    Aircraft built on aerodynamic principle lose aircraft which use gravity(magnetic electric)principle.Летательные аппараты которые строятся на аэродинамическом принципе проигрывают летательным аппаратам которые используют гравитационный(магнитно электрический)принцип.

    • @frostzxs
      @frostzxs 8 лет назад

      +Иван Иванов приведите пример серьезных преимуществ, а то выглядит как чушь какая-то...

    • @ИванИванов-я7т5о
      @ИванИванов-я7т5о 8 лет назад

      Синтез Ядерный истребитель перехватчик Гладиатор.Применения гравитационных(магнитно электрических) технологий позволило создать аналог НЛО. Гравитационные технологии позволяют создавать искусственную невесомость управлять временем(ускорять или замедлять) что позволяет поглотить импульс РЛС быть невидимым в оптическом спектре и Т.Д.Что бы вывести F-35 из строя достаточно на дним пролететь Гладиатору электроника перестанет функционировать.

    • @frostzxs
      @frostzxs 8 лет назад +1

      Иван Иванов нет такого истребителя.
      Хватит выдумывать всякую херню?

    • @ИванИванов-я7т5о
      @ИванИванов-я7т5о 8 лет назад

      Синтез Вы правы всё это выдумки.

  • @Timrem1
    @Timrem1 5 лет назад

    I worked at Northrop Grumman at biz town I was ceo

  • @filipematossilva1154
    @filipematossilva1154 9 лет назад

    Very interesting

  • @สัญญาแวงวรรณ-ฟ2ซ

    มีเอฟ35ไว้ท.อ12ลำพอดีไทยไม่มีดีสำหรับอเมริกาเพราะทหารเผล็ดการเหมือนคอมมืวเมินโลกเสรืทำยิ่งอีกทหารใหญ่

  • @gaiusdelmonte3631
    @gaiusdelmonte3631 5 лет назад +1

    Wing Nut

  • @michaelwestmoreland2530
    @michaelwestmoreland2530 2 года назад

    Stop the cap. Stop the cap RIGHT NOW, stop the cap.
    You are NOT selling me on an IRST with both the raw Agility AND sustained thrust necessary to pull a damn 180 degree turn, and then kill, off a PASSED MERGE.

  • @Spartan-op2ed
    @Spartan-op2ed 2 года назад

    Ratheon is building the das system's for cheaper and five times the performance.

  • @ayiearjuna69
    @ayiearjuna69 5 лет назад +1

    totally underestimate their enemy.. in real combat, u not only have DAS but ur aircraft will blast off in the air.. 🤣🤣🤣

    • @jaysmith6864
      @jaysmith6864 5 лет назад +1

      will blast off in the air -- LOL!

    • @ermaclenista2259
      @ermaclenista2259 5 лет назад

      And how do you possibly do that?
      Hahaha your not paying attention I think..

    • @seanyboyo1969
      @seanyboyo1969 5 лет назад

      Your name gave me a bigger laugh than your illogical comment, :D MuhaMAD Naz(r)i ! Got to say that the connetations of the word play was just so perfect.....

  • @xliver4
    @xliver4 13 лет назад

    @azotos Why does it have to only be Americans? Every company does the same thing.

  • @Capn2Mike
    @Capn2Mike 14 лет назад

    Wow! I want one! Unfortunately - it rolls to fast - I'd get sick :-(

  • @WinCan04
    @WinCan04 12 лет назад

    Has this been installed on this turkey yet?

    • @ermaclenista2259
      @ermaclenista2259 5 лет назад

      U.s back down to sell it to Turkey after Turkey bought Russian air deffense.

    • @89turbomk3
      @89turbomk3 5 лет назад

      Your replying to comment posted 6 years ago, lol

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 10 месяцев назад

      ​@@ermaclenista2259 Turkey's always been on the ruskis side. Only reason they're in NATO is because of their highly strategic position and so no one can touch them.

  • @bricksblocks228
    @bricksblocks228 4 года назад

    wait f35 lookheed not grummen

    • @SometimesPie
      @SometimesPie 3 года назад +1

      wait das northrop not lookheed

  • @PrithvisAccount
    @PrithvisAccount 11 лет назад

    Lol, Its funny to see how Sukhoi and Typhoon are getting busted. But reality may be different. They may have more sophisticated counter measures.

  • @patriced3364
    @patriced3364 3 года назад

    Such a weird design!

  • @andycroucheaux4568
    @andycroucheaux4568 10 лет назад

    All i've ever seen it do is a simple roll ...! CAN ANYONE SAY DIFFERENT ?

    • @mattslattery4107
      @mattslattery4107 9 лет назад

      +Andy Croucheaux Vid on youtube of it doing a semi cobra check it out

  • @mrkhamesangakhanephongphan6029
    @mrkhamesangakhanephongphan6029 5 лет назад

    ໃຜກາເຮັດເປັນພໍປານກັນ ສຳຄັນນັກບິນເກັ່ງສຳໃດ

  • @manudeman1841
    @manudeman1841 8 лет назад +3

    amazing system. a shame it's already outdated (being based on technology from early 2000). by 2020 any aircraft will be able to install such a system, like a bolt-on recon pod, but superior and cheaper

    • @Acecombatrules59
      @Acecombatrules59 6 лет назад +7

      Manu De Man Lol by 2020, The United States will be working on a 6th gen fighter already. PAK FA has been cancelled after multiple failures and it is too expensive to keep producing. J-20 is RIDDLED with problems and Corruption in the CCP will hinder China’s ability to wage wars.

    • @giko2556
      @giko2556 5 лет назад

      ​@@Acecombatrules59 now it's 2019 and the pak fa and j20 are better than the f 35 now what do you say--nowhere is 6 generations and f 35 barely flying

    • @Manosdepiedra1979
      @Manosdepiedra1979 3 года назад +6

      @@giko2556 Now its 2021 and only two su57 (pak fa) have been produced with shittier sensors and engines and with no defence partners in sight to help with funding lol. J20 is doing marginally better with only 50 being produced and with no information on the quality of its AESA radar (at least they have one), no implementation of a sophisticated optical system like DAS and EOTS (though they claim to be working on it) and same shitty Russian engines but they seem to be slowly upgrading them with their own indigenous design. They also seem to be working on the J31 which will be their carrier stealth fighter so kudos to china. F-35 on the another hand have had over 600 produced with multiple deliveries being fulfilled to various defence partners so yeah its "barely flying".

    • @giko2556
      @giko2556 3 года назад

      @@Manosdepiedra1979
      do you really think you are a superior nation - if so you are close to extinction

    • @Manosdepiedra1979
      @Manosdepiedra1979 3 года назад +1

      @@giko2556 Dam, Things took a turn for the worst in the last year for you huh bud? It's could be that america is superior or it could be that when you spend more than a trillion dollars on a product you might get results.

  • @borankim9049
    @borankim9049 8 лет назад

    Very amazing in the world of American battle with enemy.

  • @Left4Green
    @Left4Green 7 лет назад +4

    aimbot ffs ;///

  • @notsaying3440
    @notsaying3440 8 лет назад +6

    In my kitchen I have three appliances, a toaster, a coffee maker and a kettle.
    We are making a "joint strike appliance" that will do ALL THREE!
    Cost about $5000 (sorry now $12000)
    Some glitches, toast is soggy, coffee is crummy, water has coffee taint,
    Oh and the microwave explodes (sorry appliance on bench so decided to change specs)
    Good news is the software will fix this, extremely complex, not quite finished.
    Built concurrently, already sold 200, built in pieces in 30 states so too big to fail.
    Chinese are making thousands of $10 toasters (sorry your toast!)
    Das sounds great - but the software development has been put "on hold" while they iron out other software problems....

    • @gino14
      @gino14 7 лет назад

      Not Saying I don't know about you but I would totally buy a "Joint Strike Toaster."

  • @plumbertech8843
    @plumbertech8843 6 лет назад +4

    I feel sorry for Russia's S400 S500 systems LOL

    • @giko2556
      @giko2556 5 лет назад

      if you're so strong try it-cowboys

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy 10 месяцев назад

      ​@@giko2556 Oh I'd LOVE to fly an F-35, let alone getting to shoot something with it!

  • @donbryant58
    @donbryant58 7 лет назад

    Act now and you can get another F35 for free with purchase of the F35 you just pay shipping and handling.

  • @РобертКораев
    @РобертКораев 4 года назад

    Хороший мультик. Только даже против МиГ 21 у него шансов нет.

  • @alabamamothman2986
    @alabamamothman2986 6 лет назад +3

    If Russian radar can detect the F-35 or jam it's electronics (probably) this aircraft wouldnt stand chance against the SU-35 fighter.
    We are relying on a tech superiority that may not exist to level they expect. If at all.
    You simply cannot assume that against a modern military. We need aircraft that OUTPERFORM their aircraft. And NOT rely on wishful thinking.

    • @valenrn8657
      @valenrn8657 6 лет назад

      SU-35 doesn't have F-15C's low wing loading.
      web.archive.org/web/20170804135017/www.sukhoi.org/eng/planes/military/su30mk/lth/
      SU-30MK empty weight estimate from OEM
      24900 Kg - (2 x 105 Kg + 2 x 253 Kg + 5270 kg) = 18914 kg or 41698 lbs
      Select a desired combat range and load SU-30MK with fuel load and calculate the effective wing loading.
      Basic wing loading empty weight without factoring forward/rear body and vortex lift factors.
      Fuel and weapons load can change with different missions.
      F-16C Block 50
      Empty Weight: 18,900 lbs
      Wing area: 300 ft²
      Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet.
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.51 : 1
      F-18E
      Empty Weight: 31,500 lbs
      Wing area: 500 ft²
      Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. (minimum turn radius dogfighter)
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.40 : 1
      SU-30MK
      Empty Weight: 41,698 lbs
      Wing area: 667 ft²
      Wing loading: 62.51 lbs/ sq feet.
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.33 : 1
      F-35A
      Empty weight: 28,999 lbs (Year 2015).
      Wing area: 460 ft²
      Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet.
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.48 : 1
      SU-35
      www.flightjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/SUKHOI.pdf
      Empty Weight: 40,565 lbs (no reference)
      Wing area: 667 ft²
      Wing loading: 60.82 lbs/ sq feet.
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.42 : 1 (29000 lbf each engine)
      F-15C
      Empty Weight: 28,000 lbs
      Wing area: 608 ft²
      Wing loading: 46 lbs/ sq feet.
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.70 : 1 (energy dogfighter)
      F-22A
      Empty Weight: 43,340 lb
      Wing area: 840 ft²
      Wing loading: 51.59 lbs/ sq feet.
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.71 : 1 (energy dogfighter)
      F-35A with Option Block 1 engine upgrade
      Empty weight: 28,999 lb (Year 2015).
      Wing area: 460 ft²
      Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet.
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.57 : 1 ( 6 percent thrust upgrade)
      Thrust weight ratio: 1.63 : 1 (10 percent thrust upgrade)

    • @ermaclenista2259
      @ermaclenista2259 5 лет назад

      Do you really think u.s let that happen ?
      Of course they already had an answer for that ...
      They think advance and faster than you do..

  • @manilaalmost3872
    @manilaalmost3872 5 лет назад

    Wow😮😮😍🇺🇸

  • @commercio3564
    @commercio3564 5 лет назад +3

    *D A S*

  • @andrespereydaresearch
    @andrespereydaresearch 4 года назад

    nice arpeggiated hard-sync

  • @borankim9049
    @borankim9049 8 лет назад

    F 35 of American very amazing in the world.

  • @Azotos007
    @Azotos007 13 лет назад

    Bet you can not see everything everywhere all the time with that machine.
    But you Americans are fantastic in deceiving arts (marketing in this advid).