The Babi Yar symphony is absolutely fabulous, one of the only pieces that struck me even on the first listen and it's still one of my favorite works ever written. What a horrifying first movement.
A truly unsettling work, all the more so since it recalls one of the most egregious atrocities of WWII, the mass slaughter of Ukrainian Jews by the SS Einsatzen extermination squads that followed Hitler's armies into the USSR. Particularly chilling was the matter of fact testimony of the leader of one of the SS killing squads from the docket at Nuremberg. He was merely following orders. General Otto Ohlendorf in civilian clothes had the look of an obscure clerk. Music has that power to invoke the horrible.
As a total beginner’s guide, I broadly agree with this list. There’s only one piece I’d add, in fact - his Piano Concerto No. 1 in C Minor (also known as the Concerto for Piano and Trumpet). It scratches two itches both of which are represented in your list but that it is such a good example of that I couldn’t not mention. Firstly, it’s an example of how he could write music that isn’t intense or emotional or dramatic but is light and *just plain fun*. I love the mood of this concerto, from the gentle jazz-y harmonies of the second movement ripped from his ballet “The Golden Age” (which always makes me think of cigar-smoke-filled 1920s Speakeasies and the like) to the galloping second movement with its round-and-round-again melody right at the end that feels like it could never stop and so leaves itself stuck on a loop in your mind for a minute afterwards. It’s nothing difficult to penetrate, but it’s fun and lighthearted and will be stuck in your head for a while afterwards and is something worth remembering that Shostakovich could do. Secondly, it’s a showcase of his love for the piano. Shostakovich was a pianist in addition to a composer (indeed, you can hear his time working as the accompaniment to silent films shine though in the music of this concerto) and some of his best stuff is for the piano (Trio 2, Quintet, both concerti, the 24 Preludes and Fugues, etc.) There’s a recording of Shostakovich himself playing this concerto, and although the quality is so-so and the composer himself is playing fast and loose with his own tempo markings, you can hear in the music how much he loves playing this instrument and how much he understands it at a deep and fundamental level.
I enjoy most of your videos, but I feel you have outdone yourself with this series in general, and this episode in particular. You went straight to the heart of Shostakovich, and that is a rare achievement. Thanks so much for what you do!
The Piano Trio No. 2 is my absolute favorite Shostakovich chamber work. He dedicated it to the memory of his best friend, musicologist Ivan Sollertinsky, who died during WWII. In doing so Shostakovich carried on a tradition amongst Russian composers (starting with Tchaikovsky) of writing piano trios as memorials. So of course it's intensely personal and heartfelt.
I agree. If I had to select Shosty's best work, it would be the piano trio. It's such a shame he didn't write more in the genre (though I do enjoy his earlier attempt). He had a real knack for it.
Shostakovich was such an unbelievable musical talent. My first introduction to his music was the Music for variety/jazz band orchestra. It's tunes, rhythm, harmonies, and fun just drew me in...couldn't believe it was classical music ,but I was hooked. My next exposure was Festival overture (Boston Pops TV broadcast with their assistant conductor- this was during a time Fiedler was sick and out for a month) and it was more cool,rhythmic, and LOUD! But when I heard his 5th symphony (my 1st Shostakovich symphony) I was blown out of my seat, speechless, confused & enlightened all at the same time. That was the true beginning of my love affair with the music of Shostakovich (that recording as I remember was an Ormandy one) I was so hypnotized by the music, and lucky for me one of the music professors at our small liberal arts College (bless you Mrs. Virginia Smith) was good friends with my parents and I approached her about the music and she let me barrow an LP of "The Bernstein NYPHIL " recording for 2 weeks and that was it!!!!! I never turned back 👍 Fortunately for me during my professional career I got to perform the symphonies 1,5,6,9,10, 11,12(which I actually like) Festival Ovt. Band transcription of last mvt. Of 5th, scherzo of 10th, and Festival overture...Good Times 👍 Thank you Mrs. Smith 😘
In complete honesty, I tend to want to find problems in your approach to classical music and its many recordings, but I find myself agreeing enthusiastically with most of the material you present. But this 'Beginner's Guide' to Shostakovich is really beautiful and even touching. You have such a feel for his music. Your use of the term "compassion" describing the central, consistent element in his music is stop on perfect.
Strangely, I tended to sideline Shostakovich when I was discovering the great composers. My attention was focused on his works after I happened to hear a live performance of the 6th symphony and I was amazed at how good it was. Needless to say from that day on I explored all the symphonies and realised, though uneven as they are, contained in these 15 are absolute gems of the 20th c.
Another great video in another great series. I find you’re enthusiasm and depth of knowledge uttery infectious and can’t thank you enough for the many hours of informative and entertaining videos.
A HUGE thank you Dave! For decades I've dipped my toe into the music of Shostakovich (so to speak) now and then and I've never been moved by his music . I thought I'd try again and knew who to turn to for advice. I paused this video after the first recommendation (5th Symphony) then cheated by checking the 'however' recommendation from your Best 5th Symphony video - Kurt Sanderling. I streamed that from Qobuz last night on my very good hi-fi and I was almost moved to tears - WOW what wonderful music and a fabulous recording to boot! So tonight it'll be the Violin concerto after seeking your advice. It seems all I needed was an expert guide to his music - thanks a million!
A flawless list. I probably started with something similar, although it took me far longer to hear the Babi Yar than it should have. One could easily argue it’s the best thing DSCH did.
What a great selection, David. I loved it. Dimitri Shostakovich was surely one of the greatest composers who has ever lived. I adore his music. However, I cannot listen to the fifth symphony when the coda to the finale is drawn out. Our local orchestra played it that way some years ago and it really upset me. That's why I love the Bernstein recordings so much. As far as the tenth symphony is concerned, he surely never composed a finer symphonic first movement. In a good performance, it can be overwhelming. I also love the Babiy Yar symphony. It's both glorious and gut-wrenching at the same time.
@@Warp75 It might just be an apocryphal story, but I think I read that Shostakovich always kept a packed suitcase close at hand, just in case he got the dreaded midnight knock on his door advising him that he would be taking a long train ride to a very cold climate. To calm his nerves he was rarely without a very strong Russian cigarette in his hand. Considering the lung cancer and heart disease that got him in the end it's remarkable he nearly made it to his 70th year. What a wealth of great music!
I've often reflected on how much David's presentation, while eschewing playing sample clips, uses verbal pictures to light a spark in the ears of listeners who've yet to confront a given composer's work. One might ask that when the subject is music, wouldn't it be optimal to hear examples? Further, aren't audio clips essential? The alluring pictures that David paints through certain perfectly relevant biographical facts like the drastic shifts in the context of Shostakovitch's personal life and his colorful characterization of the music itself leads me to answer: No, David's got it just right. Hearing the music would, in many cases, not instill a lasting anticipation on behalf of the uninitiated listener. Hearing a clip could too easily quash this anticipation (i.e., backfire!...case closed), but an ingratiating verbal picture can overcome this frustration of a facile dismissal and I know of no one else in the popular media who does it this well.
For the light music of DSCH there was a delightful disc by Andre Kostelanetz on Columbia, The Light Music of Shostakovich. Its made it to cd. I recall hearing first after knowing symphonies 1,5,7,8, 9 10 and 13 and could scarcely believe it was the same composer though 1 and 9 should have been a clue; but those two symphonies have tinges of tragedy and pathos as well. And 9 thumbs its nose at the entire Soviet bureaucracy.
For beginners, i.e. students (possibly with a short attention span), how about introducing the 7th, first movement only, taking care to explain the historical significance -- siege of Leningrad -- with an ad-hoc orchestra cobbled together for a world-wide broadcast.
I dont believe I've ever heard his 13th symphony, might have to put that right pronto. Or presto, even. I have most of his earlier symphonies in a series from the National Scottish Orchestra, I don't know if they're particularly well-regarded and I doubt I've heard much else from that outfit but I've always thought they were great. But I think they stop at the 10th and I suppose I've just never got around hunting down the later ones.
My personal favourite Shostakovich album is Martha Argerich in a thrilling version of the piano trio no. 2 along with the concerto for piano and trumpet and other works. The concerto is a wonderful combination of his serious and lighter sides and fits a great deal of inspiration into a short space. It sealed the deal for me, although I grew up with the Ortiz version including concerto no. 2. Now rather underrated, it’s a very musical disc too.
@@Bobbnoxious Bobbnoxious, let's give a nod to the knotty 15th quartet: six movements each marked "adagio" and lasting 35 minutes. Best to be heard with a cup of strong earl grey tea, yet a moving piece of music.
You mentioned Stalin in this video. I realized not only did Stalin give Shostakovich and Soviet people the suffering, he also restricted the musical form that Shostakovich can use from his cultural policy. You complained in other videos that western avant-garde music is unbearable. Without Stalin, Shostakovich would probably become a serialist following Schoenberg and Webern and write unlistenable music. In retrospect, do you think Stalin's musical policy has any good thing(even if minimally)?
![Yuja Wang: Shostakovich Concerto No. 1 in C minor for Piano and Trumpet [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/iImL-M_YhPU/mqdefault.jpg)
The Babi Yar symphony is absolutely fabulous, one of the only pieces that struck me even on the first listen and it's still one of my favorite works ever written. What a horrifying first movement.
A truly unsettling work, all the more so since it recalls one of the most egregious atrocities of WWII, the mass slaughter of Ukrainian Jews by the SS Einsatzen extermination squads that followed Hitler's armies into the USSR.
Particularly chilling was the matter of fact testimony of the leader of one of the SS killing squads from the docket at Nuremberg.
He was merely following orders.
General Otto Ohlendorf in civilian clothes had the look of an obscure clerk.
Music has that power to invoke the horrible.
Mr Hurwitz’s Unlocking The Masters Book on Shostakovich has been extremely helpful in my understanding of his works.
As a total beginner’s guide, I broadly agree with this list. There’s only one piece I’d add, in fact - his Piano Concerto No. 1 in C Minor (also known as the Concerto for Piano and Trumpet). It scratches two itches both of which are represented in your list but that it is such a good example of that I couldn’t not mention.
Firstly, it’s an example of how he could write music that isn’t intense or emotional or dramatic but is light and *just plain fun*. I love the mood of this concerto, from the gentle jazz-y harmonies of the second movement ripped from his ballet “The Golden Age” (which always makes me think of cigar-smoke-filled 1920s Speakeasies and the like) to the galloping second movement with its round-and-round-again melody right at the end that feels like it could never stop and so leaves itself stuck on a loop in your mind for a minute afterwards. It’s nothing difficult to penetrate, but it’s fun and lighthearted and will be stuck in your head for a while afterwards and is something worth remembering that Shostakovich could do.
Secondly, it’s a showcase of his love for the piano. Shostakovich was a pianist in addition to a composer (indeed, you can hear his time working as the accompaniment to silent films shine though in the music of this concerto) and some of his best stuff is for the piano (Trio 2, Quintet, both concerti, the 24 Preludes and Fugues, etc.) There’s a recording of Shostakovich himself playing this concerto, and although the quality is so-so and the composer himself is playing fast and loose with his own tempo markings, you can hear in the music how much he loves playing this instrument and how much he understands it at a deep and fundamental level.
I enjoy most of your videos, but I feel you have outdone yourself with this series in general, and this episode in particular. You went straight to the heart of Shostakovich, and that is a rare achievement. Thanks so much for what you do!
The Piano Trio No. 2 is my absolute favorite Shostakovich chamber work. He dedicated it to the memory of his best friend, musicologist Ivan Sollertinsky, who died during WWII. In doing so Shostakovich carried on a tradition amongst Russian composers (starting with Tchaikovsky) of writing piano trios as memorials. So of course it's intensely personal and heartfelt.
I agree. If I had to select Shosty's best work, it would be the piano trio. It's such a shame he didn't write more in the genre (though I do enjoy his earlier attempt). He had a real knack for it.
Hello everybody!
Please consider watching Mr Hurwitz's
excellent talks on all 15 symphonies of Mr Shostakovich.
Best wishes Fred .
Shostakovich was such an unbelievable musical talent.
My first introduction to his music was the Music for variety/jazz band orchestra. It's tunes, rhythm, harmonies, and fun just drew me in...couldn't believe it was classical music ,but I was hooked.
My next exposure was Festival overture (Boston Pops TV broadcast with their assistant conductor- this was during a time Fiedler was sick and out for a month) and it was more cool,rhythmic, and LOUD!
But when I heard his 5th symphony (my 1st Shostakovich symphony) I was blown out of my seat, speechless, confused & enlightened all at the same time. That was the true beginning of my love affair with the music of Shostakovich (that recording as I remember was an Ormandy one)
I was so hypnotized by the music, and lucky for me one of the music professors at our small liberal arts College (bless you Mrs. Virginia Smith) was good friends with my parents and I approached her about the music and she let me barrow an LP of "The Bernstein NYPHIL " recording for 2 weeks and that was it!!!!! I never turned back 👍
Fortunately for me during my professional career I got to perform the symphonies 1,5,6,9,10, 11,12(which I actually like) Festival Ovt. Band transcription of last mvt. Of 5th, scherzo of 10th, and Festival overture...Good Times 👍
Thank you Mrs. Smith 😘
Dave, you smashed it with this list - nothing to add, subtract, or append. I appreciate your inclusion of the Suite for Variety Orchestra.
Shostakovich's music is among the most subjective I am familiar with.
Great Commentary on the music and life of Shostakovich.
In complete honesty, I tend to want to find problems in your approach to classical music and its many recordings, but I find myself agreeing enthusiastically with most of the material you present. But this 'Beginner's Guide' to Shostakovich is really beautiful and even touching. You have such a feel for his music. Your use of the term "compassion" describing the central, consistent element in his music is stop on perfect.
Thank you! Stop wanting to find problems with my approach. Life is too short!
Great list & impresed to see Babi Yar included. I feel the piano concerto no. 2 is a colourful, popular work that appeals to many
It is and it does, but that's not the point here!
Strangely, I tended to sideline Shostakovich when I was discovering the great composers. My attention was focused on his works after I happened to hear a live performance of the 6th symphony and I was amazed at how good it was. Needless to say from that day on I explored all the symphonies and realised, though uneven as they are, contained in these 15 are absolute gems of the 20th c.
Another great video in another great series. I find you’re enthusiasm and depth of knowledge uttery infectious and can’t thank you enough for the many hours of informative and entertaining videos.
A HUGE thank you Dave! For decades I've dipped my toe into the music of Shostakovich (so to speak) now and then and I've never been moved by his music . I thought I'd try again and knew who to turn to for advice. I paused this video after the first recommendation (5th Symphony) then cheated by checking the 'however' recommendation from your Best 5th Symphony video - Kurt Sanderling. I streamed that from Qobuz last night on my very good hi-fi and I was almost moved to tears - WOW what wonderful music and a fabulous recording to boot! So tonight it'll be the Violin concerto after seeking your advice. It seems all I needed was an expert guide to his music - thanks a million!
Thank you and enjoy!
Dave, you don’’t need to worry about what other people write in or pile on, we’re really only listening to you anyway. 😉
Well, I do read everything here, and it matters to me that the comments remain helpful and (mostly) topical.
A flawless list. I probably started with something similar, although it took me far longer to hear the Babi Yar than it should have. One could easily argue it’s the best thing DSCH did.
What a great selection, David. I loved it. Dimitri Shostakovich was surely one of the greatest composers who has ever lived. I adore his music. However, I cannot listen to the fifth symphony when the coda to the finale is drawn out. Our local orchestra played it that way some years ago and it really upset me. That's why I love the Bernstein recordings so much. As far as the tenth symphony is concerned, he surely never composed a finer symphonic first movement. In a good performance, it can be overwhelming. I also love the Babiy Yar symphony. It's both glorious and gut-wrenching at the same time.
The darker & the moodier Shostakovich is the more I like him.
Right?!
@@R0bstar-YT That’s just my opinion it’s doesn’t mean I’m right.
Indeed! and there is much that is dark and moody. Shostakovich wrote for his time!
I wonder what he would make of the 21st century?
@@johkkarkalis8860 Absolutely John! Not much different from his view of the 20th century aka we doomed!!
@@Warp75 It might just be an apocryphal story, but I think I read that Shostakovich always kept a packed suitcase close at hand, just in case he got the dreaded midnight knock on his door advising him that he would be taking a long train ride to a very cold climate.
To calm his nerves he was rarely without a very strong Russian cigarette in his hand.
Considering the lung cancer and heart disease that got him in the end it's remarkable he nearly made it to his 70th year.
What a wealth of great music!
This is a fun series! Interested to see if you plan on doing a Haydn one, as I’m really starting to get into his music.
Are you kidding? Of course!
@@DavesClassicalGuideoh boy 🔥
@@DavesClassicalGuide cant wait! Love the channel, you are the reason I started really getting into Haydn.
I've often reflected on how much David's presentation, while eschewing playing sample clips, uses verbal pictures to light a spark in the ears of listeners who've yet to confront a given composer's work. One might ask that when the subject is music, wouldn't it be optimal to hear examples? Further, aren't audio clips essential?
The alluring pictures that David paints through certain perfectly relevant biographical facts like the drastic shifts in the context of Shostakovitch's personal life and his colorful characterization of the music itself leads me to answer:
No, David's got it just right. Hearing the music would, in many cases, not instill a lasting anticipation on behalf of the uninitiated listener. Hearing a clip could too easily quash this anticipation (i.e., backfire!...case closed), but an ingratiating verbal picture can overcome this frustration of a facile dismissal and I know of no one else in the popular media who does it this well.
As you did, any such list would have to include the 5th and 10th Symphonies.
For the light music of DSCH there was a delightful disc by Andre Kostelanetz on Columbia, The Light Music of Shostakovich. Its made it to cd. I recall hearing first after knowing symphonies 1,5,7,8, 9 10 and 13 and could scarcely believe it was the same composer though 1 and 9 should have been a clue; but those two symphonies have tinges of tragedy and pathos as well. And 9 thumbs its nose at the entire Soviet bureaucracy.
For beginners, i.e. students (possibly with a short attention span),
how about introducing the 7th, first movement only, taking care
to explain the historical significance -- siege of Leningrad -- with an
ad-hoc orchestra cobbled together for a world-wide broadcast.
I dont believe I've ever heard his 13th symphony, might have to put that right pronto. Or presto, even.
I have most of his earlier symphonies in a series from the National Scottish Orchestra, I don't know if they're particularly well-regarded and I doubt I've heard much else from that outfit but I've always thought they were great. But I think they stop at the 10th and I suppose I've just never got around hunting down the later ones.
Which would be your best recommendation for a complete quartet cycle?
My personal favourite Shostakovich album is Martha Argerich in a thrilling version of the piano trio no. 2 along with the concerto for piano and trumpet and other works. The concerto is a wonderful combination of his serious and lighter sides and fits a great deal of inspiration into a short space. It sealed the deal for me, although I grew up with the Ortiz version including concerto no. 2. Now rather underrated, it’s a very musical disc too.
I miss the fifth string quartet.
The fifth is hardcore, definitely not for beginners. One of the works Shostakovich wrote "for the desk drawer" until Stalin kicked the bucket.
@@Bobbnoxious Bobbnoxious, let's give a nod to the knotty 15th quartet: six movements each marked "adagio" and lasting 35 minutes.
Best to be heard with a cup of strong earl grey tea, yet a moving piece of music.
You mentioned Stalin in this video. I realized not only did Stalin give Shostakovich and Soviet people the suffering, he also restricted the musical form that Shostakovich can use from his cultural policy. You complained in other videos that western avant-garde music is unbearable. Without Stalin, Shostakovich would probably become a serialist following Schoenberg and Webern and write unlistenable music. In retrospect, do you think Stalin's musical policy has any good thing(even if minimally)?
I don't think your premise is correct.