Red Zone Means NO Drone its a LIVE Nuclear Plant 💥🛸🤔🚔😨
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 мар 2024
- Hinckley Nuclear Power Station. Active side is EDF and the site we see first is under construction. I speak to Police in depth about drone laws and it becomes very interesting.
Nuclear Police stop me twice along with G4S.
The security guy from Hinckley A was really polite and helpful. A credit to his profession and employer.
Dje talked his absolute ear off though, bloody hell!
Great interaction credit to the police for there proffessional response and interaction :)
What a change lovely friendly interaction well done the 2 officers interesting to see these places friendly people all round
This was a fantastic learning opportunity for the on-site police in particular, and hopefully they took full advantage. We all have our jobs to do, so these kind of discussions are so important to make it safe for everyone!
If onLy the police responded so quickly to real crime.
isn't it a nuclear site? probably "their" stationed place if so.
Not really 'police'. More like quasi-militarised security guards, just like Wayne Couzens was originally.
If only they’d respond.
Calls are graded, nuclear sites would be grade A which is the highest, response teams would be despatched straight away
@@davidsimpson2547 I think people may realise this and are speaking tongue in cheek. Then again !
Friendly couple of officers, not overbearing willing to listen.
They still thought it was illegal to fly the drone in the zone which is worrying, are they being misled? It is either legal or not legal, it is not hazy!
What's more worrying is that you don't know what you're talking about. His flight were illegal but luckily he dodged a bullet here because they wasnt too sure either, I fly drones myself and he's definitely misunderstood the restriction. Why do you think he hasn't shown the footage?
@@wilky8392 he aint misunderstood the restrictions he just trying his luck same as most of the auditor's they gotta do it to get the views
@@wilky8392 So does the FRZ show up on the apps that flyers use? If not, why not?
@PJ-wm9nq yes it shows up. He miss understood the fact that it says helicopter are permitted with permission but other maned and unmanned vehicles (drones included) are not permitted
How much kit has he got on his vest? He must struggle to fit in that car 😊
Seeeee my vest, see my vest.....
He's not getting out of that cop car after his doughnuts and coffee, the chances of him catching you if you ran off are minimal.
@@daddylonglegs2010yeah that’s why he has a gun, no one can outrun bullets 😂
Good to know that the SIA guards protecting Nuclear sites are not our friends from the Hotels for once LOL
Thank god😂
@@Guccit865 lol 🤣
West African Security Ltd have put in a quote!
Not yet....give it a bit of time!
Hell man, fairly decent coppers!
AIRSPACE : Restricted Area EGR153 HINKLEY POINT.
Section 239 ANO gives the Secretary of State the power to restrict flying in areas deemed not safe in the public interest, for example..... (a)the intended gathering or movement of a large number of persons; (b)the intended holding of an aircraft race or contest or of a flying display; or (c)national defence or any other reason affecting the public interest. The legislation and areas restricted are already in place which is why there are FRZs etc. There is also a list of all drone encounters flying over nuclear sites and this one will now be on that list as "pilot spoken to, words of advice given to pilot" You're lucky they didn't seize your drone and prosecute you using the GPS of where your drone had flown.
Wouldn't they have to get your name to prosecute you.
@@nathanwilson3737
Already obtained from the DVLA database. As he posed no threat, and acted reasonably whilst being advised, they don’t feel there’s a need to prosecute.
@@BoronAlloy DVLA don't hold any details of drone flyers
They are definitely restrictions at my local National Grid place at Barnby Dun Nr Doncaster and not just Nuclear power stations. No idea why because theres nothing in there of any likelihood of being damaged by a 249 gr drone. Drones do fly up to the boundary but the drone itself will not fly any further into the place automatically .No one needs to worry about drones at all at any of these red zone areas
@@nathanwilson3737
I was referring to this specific video’s drone pilot, in that the Police had already figured out who he was from his car reg, which he effectively told them that it was his. I wasn’t implying that the DVLA held drone owners’ or pilots’ details, since we know that’s not within their remit.
Support you 100% mate, love what you do but the old saying goes 'time and place' and 'live to fight another battle'. When the security guard was going out of his way to be polite and highlight the point about restrictions and the police say the same and also say we are not going to do anything about it, I think best to just say thanks and draw the zipper across the mouth. It's a nuclear site at the end of the day not a police station or migrant hotel. I do a lot of photography myself but also being a 15 year Army veteran who worked a lot to protect vital assets etc, I wouldn't film the site at all out of principle given how critical it is.
Re-uploaded without all the illegal flying footage, ace!
To be fair to the copper he was only 5% sneaky 👍
Excellent work by the Police and Security guard. Good on them.
Nice informational video for viewers and the well informed police!
Great information from the cop's in this one
The security guard was great 👍🏾
Sounds like you have the regulation back to front.All nuclear facilities have a prohibited area with a lat and long point with a distance from that point and a height above ground level where no aircraft including unmanned aircraft can enter.There are exceptions for helicopters taking off or landing from and within the area with the permission of the owners or person incharge of the site ie they may have a VIP visitor.
Another exemption is medevac, air sea rescue and military helicopters, Police helicopters are generally not included in the exemption believe it or not!!!!!
Good Video and very informative. Just shows that not even the people protecting our critical infrastructure know the true law. Well done mate, one of the better videos.
You’ve literally incriminated yourself with this video by admitting you got the drone up in a NFZ, it’s clearly marked as a NFZ on drone assist as A it’s a nuclear site and B it has a helipad, not the brightest button are you 🤦♂️
I don't think it has been fuelled up yet!
They were replacing a hydraulic hose on the barrier. G4S and Securitas are same company.
Can police please make sure they know what they’re talking about before they come spouting out rules. Sick of all the lying.
You can carry on dreaming 😴
If police knew the law they would of become lawyers instead of a copper
Well if nothing else, you were certainly given a detailed explanation that's for sure!
Whaaaat? G4S employed to do nuclear security???? We're DOOMED!
Im sorry to say, that your understanding of Drone assist is not quite correct. It uses data formed from notams info pushed by altitude angel. This flight is in an official restricted area: EGR153 HINKLEY POINT and therefore illegal. You mention central London and flights there, again this isn't correct, there is a helicopter zone over the top but there is also a drone-restricted zone (in fact 3) 157,258 and 159 below this. Please check before flying. Thanks
What a great Audit with very amicable conversations
I actually used to work there on both a and b sites, this was before the days of drones. If there was an aircraft that ventured too close the site incident alarm would sound .
They also did exercises where UK special forces would land in a Chinook in the field next to ' a' site which is now the new 'c station '
LOL They had already checked out your car :D Priceless
I normally watch the main Auditors but came across your Channel. Impressive stuff! You just got another Subscriber. Impressive stuff! Well done you!
He is a main one now.
The 3
The 2 I watch are dj audits and dje media
@@CatAuditshe really isn’t
Nuclear sites don't mess with them even under construction, top security. Nice Police good lads.
100% agree.
The young security guy what a difference! And one of our own for a change!! Very Professional son!👍
Wow nice informative copper that's rare
The tracks for crane. The circle are part of the crane tracks for turning
Amazing, interesting video
Nice informative cops decent guys security guy was a nice lad others take note cheers dje
The Restricted Zone is restricted ONLY to the activities permitted in the "Remarks". Therefore unless you are in a helicopter (with relevant permissions) flight is not permitted. Notes also say "Unless regulations in your region explicitly permit the operation of your drone in this area, we recommend you do not operate your drone here.". I cannot see how your flight could have been perceived as OK.
DJE Media.... Great informative video but where is the drone footage? Enjoyed the content though 👍👍👍👏👏👏
Entertaining material from DJE 😎
When I used to fly drones the pilot can use FPV, but you had to have an observer by your side
249g are restricted from flying over crowds, I would take that as being festivals, football crowds, crowds of 50 or more etc
I love “core value” and “robust “ bull corporate jargon.
What was all the equipment that police officer waring and how can he carry out his duties
Always insightful 👌 👍 🎮🛸see you on the next one!
How would you know form blue lining on the road that you were entering nuclear property with no signs don’t think they would have a leg to stand on there
Did you not see the FRZ on Drone Assist? It's not just drones that are restricted. Civil aircraft have to be above 5000 feet.
Dude, that is a massive no fly zone, oldbury and berkeley are decommissioned, but they are still no fly zones, posting this renders you liable to prosecution.
excellent police and security personell, spot on!
You misread what I was trying to say I think Poppy, wasn't having a dig I was saying you be yourself x
Not bad for the police unlike most of them, good video
Are you going to post the drone footage?
Not every nuclear facility is 2NM, Burghfield is only 1NM under The Air Navigation (Restriction of Flying) (Nuclear Installations) Regulations 1988
John Cena spotted masquerading as a British nuclear policeman!
Well, all that explaining about flying the drone was as clear as mud, One copper was contradicting and waffling on while the other was just desperate to find out what car you were in so he could get your details even though you had refused.
Did you not check Drone Assist before flying here? I would’ve taken seeing that red zone as not allowed, It’s all a no fly zone. I’ve done Hinkley Point myself and I even referenced it in my video that you can’t fly a drone there
Isnt Hinkley point being built and financed by our closest allies? France and China?
if nuclear sights are made to be able to take a airliner crashing into them i dont think a drone will do much lol but all in all everyone was cool and had a good chat
Poor security guy he is being so polite and your coming across as a arrogant child Mr i know it all .
Police will be able to identify anyone with facial recognition technology
I'm mum to my 3 dogs ... So yeah happy mother's day to me 💓 ah blissful quiet 💕
How’s everyone’s day going
Good long video upload again dje media let's see what the next one brings I don't mind if they go on for a while really nearly a hour long ok 👍
Why would it be irresponsible flying a drone over a nuclear site? There is no danger of a drone or anyone causing an explosion. If there is then maybe time to get rid of nuclear power plants. Mankind is curious, and especially when it's our government. So they will always want to view it.
The Police forcing road users to cross a solid white line, very unprofessional....but then again they don't really care about laws.
You have a good video's
next time they ask the weight of your drone, tell them 0.000245 imperial tons :D or 8.78 ounce :D or something like that... you got it :D
My friend be very careful at hinkly point the security carry guns ok.
Level headed bunch of people,makes a change😊
What’s with the police now days with all the stuff on the vest and will it get in the way when driving
People who are as nice as those guys, are perfectly fine telling your youtube name and whatnot. We're not that bothered.
But yea, pleasant audit. Good job
Were is the drone footage💥
taken down so as to not self incriminate . or simple answer not to drop himself in the s h i t 💩🤣
The most frustrating video yet, when you kept saying it’s stupid to fly over they kept thinking you was agreeing that it’s illegal to fly over
Does anyone know why that police car hasn't got the red asterix on display even though it has police with guns using it?
Every force has different policies for example the met use a yellow asterix/star but as CNC is a routinely armed force like MDP they probably won't mark the vehicles as armed police as the force crest does that straight away so it is a waste of time, it's the same with MDP, they actually only mark non-armed vehicles, usually used for their version of a PCSO
In UK law you can pretty much do whatever you want unless it is specifically forbidden. DJE you are likely correct that unless the instruction mentions drones, they are more than likely not prohibited.
Is the cop talking about certain sized drones or circumcised drones?
Hmm, "circumcised" drones....Israel has probably more knowledge of nuclear technology than the UK.....don't know about Islamists though!
OBVIOUSLY. !!!
It's not the one AB just covered in Didcot is it? Two security armed police got educated.
No I did that one a while ago. Hinckley Nuclear plant. Big big one..
how u get to see it early? you're not a member
You are trying to catch them out 😂 you clearly know the law and playing dumb
Meanwhile the 'pro' drone police are crashing and losing drones left right and centre...
EGR153 HINKLEY POINT....? Does that not apply to you
Yes it does.He is new to all this so has got it wrong in this case.
The line of sight rule is total dog 💩
Not a clue , thick ! 👮
Driver of the police vehicle psyching viewers out by rolling forward and back again.🤨
The officer is talking nonsense on some of the drone rules.
POLICE TAKING THEIR PERCIEVED RESPONSIBILITY TO PUT THEIR NOSES INTO PEOPLE'S PASTIME.
WHY CANT COPS LEAVE POLICEING OF DRONES TO THE CAA.
I think the rule is stay well away and don’t put yourself in that position 🙄🤔😊😅
🤣🤣👍👍👍👍
The way they parked caused all traffic coming past to cross the double white lines. They seemed OK but they couldn't definitively state the law when pressed. Vague phraseology and ambiguous statements.
What else do these plod do all day?
Stop talking it's their job to investigate uphold your rights remain silent for the love of will you ever learn.😮
Top copper.
EDF Electricity de France, still getting electric from our French brothers and sisters..
And they sometimes buy it off UK too . Its a business flogging electrons as expensive to store them in batteries.
If the CAA allows it. The police and nuclear plants can cry all they want. What you're doing is legal. Nuclear plants if restricted by CAA, then no go. But if the police and the plant have their own policy. Then that's exactly what it is. A policy and your not breaking a law. So fly all you want as the cops are copsplaining for something that is not actually real.
How much shit has he got hanging off him?
🤔 i do'nt know what i'm talking about , but i can pretend that i do . 👮🤡
1000nth like
how about your name first copper?
11000volts. Not waych, Th A Team, then¿
Lots of waffle on here.....
You seriously need to do your homework on drone/rules/laws mate. You're going to be one of these youtubers that rise then have a massive fall. This area is restricted area and your flight were completely illegal in fact,most of your flights are illegal to be honest whether its VLOS restricted zones or flying to low (yes I said flying too low) private property in deed do own the immediate airspace in their boundary (usually to the height of their building) I don't comment to be a prat for the sake of it but I want to make sure the rules are followed for two reasons 1) is so that you don't find your self in hot water 2) as a drone operator myself I don't want people ruining the hobby that I love. The more rules get broken then the more restrictions I will have imposed on me. The rules were a little more relaxed before this auditing craze but since then they added little extra restrictions like VLOS . VLOS were a numerical number, 500m to be precise but then they said you have to be able to see it and after that ,they added that you must see it and be able to know it's orientation
@dpjpkp1 it's still a privacy issue mate even if it's a commercial property. Yes this is technically a civil matter but a massive corporation with money to but can and have successfully sued operators for the same thing
Your almost correct mate, it's prohibited and you can use self defense (e.g. takedown, choke & punching within reason) but only if the drone flyer is doing it for commercial reasons (RUclips DOES count as commercial reasons) so for example most of these auditors put themselves at risk with these videos.
Hi all 👍🏻