The most understandable of interpretations of this complex sonata I have yet heard. Lovely. Thank you for the performance Daniil, and for the recording Mr K.
Bárbara Cohen. This Rachmaninov piece Sonata is coated in lustrous beauty. Trifonov brings out the color, with exhilarating grasp, yet the tenderness of the piece is on true display. He is a pianist in his own league, and every time I have heard him perform he teaches me something new and exciting about Rachmaninov. The work is long, can go on and on, but it Trifonov’s hands it is magic. Thank you.
I have never heard someone play the finale that way and it is absolutely beautiful, the interpretation is among the highest for me. The softness and care put into the entire piece is glamorous
Ciò che Trifonov ha fatto di questa sonata è incredibile! Colori struggenti, dinamiche che nemmeno Rachmaninov forse sapeva di aver scritto. Sicuramente esagero, ma vi assicuro che prima di fare questo commento ho voluto ascoltare ogni altra interpretazione della sonata 1, presente su you tube. Ebbene, fra le tante bellissime esecuzioni, non voglio propriamente dire che questa è la migliore, ma semplicemente ch'è un'altra cosa. Trifonov, sembra qui trarre ispirazione e alimento da mondi ultraterreni. Inoltre non credo esista a tutt'oggi una lettura del secondo movimento, che può soltanto avvicinarsi a quella di alta sensibilità qui presentata. Concludo questo mio elogio, chiedendo scherzosamente a Trifinov dove ha però trovato lo spartito, perché in quello che ho io non scorgo neppure la metà delle indicazioni, tempi e dinamiche che lui presenta in questa sua performance. Probabilmente tocca avere i suoi occhi (e la sue mani) per farlo.
Complimenti per il straordinario commento !!!!! Behh c’è poco da dire ,in questo mondo ci sono pianisti estremamente bravi !! ma per me TRIFANOV in questo momento è il miglior pianista dell’universo e 1000 anni avanti a tutti .. quando suona lui è come se il tempo è il mondo intero si fermasse ……🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼
о господи что он сделал в репризе финала.... а комментаторы разумеется как всегда не то что эту сонату никогда не играли или хотя бы не послушали десятка 2-3 исполнений, но и разумеется ноты сонаты никогда не видели, если вообще обучены нотной грамоте. о Божечки... когда что-нибудь такое себе позволял пианист экстра класса вот я думаю.. какой нибудь Рихтер или Микаленджели такое бы сотворили, думаю ушли бы в монастырь. причем эмоция у Трифонова то как раз совершенно верная, но извините всю эту музыку надо делать в то время которое автор имел в виду, а не.. не то что в 2 раза, а в 10 раз медленнее! пойду еще раз послушаю этот момент, когда еще такое услышишь ..
Saw Trifonov at Davies Symphony Hall, where we sought his caress, our auditory senses stirred, gentilly, exquisitely, letting Pleasure's subterfuge engulf the mass...
3rd Mov: This is how I could imagine Ivo Pogorelić playing it. Some very interesting things going on in here. Always nice to hear a fresh approach and Trifonov is the man to attempt such things and pull them off.
No doubt, Rachmaninoff loved writing in minor keys. Both piano sonatas and all four piano concertos in the minor key. Much more mysterious, exotic and exciting.
If nothing else, Trifonov is different. I do not think that he could have squeezed another ounce of emotion out of this even if he wanted to. He is a consummate performer, there is no doubt. He makes effects like no other. Ogdon is also very good.
Daniil makes --playing with that Form like a composer--simple & very cleare! It's UNIQUE,I finally understood everything in this Sonata!...In this Sonata's giving special Russian's "znamenni raspev",like in Rachmaninov's 3-th Concerto,its Rachmaninov special technique ! BRAVISSIMO, DANIIL!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@@happycreeper6923 Ah poto, c'est plutôt à toi de démontrer qu'il s'agit du truc le plus styléique qui se soit jamais introduit dans l'appareil auditif du tout-venant, plutôt qu'à moi de démontrer le contraire. Je ne peux pas prendre un bouquin au hasard, dire : "c'est le meilleur livre jamais écrit", et répondre à qui trouve cette considération excessive : "j'espère que tes géniteurs te déshériteront pour cette non-argumentation". Je dis ça bien que trouvant cette œuvre d'un styléisme immodéré (je la travaille en ce moment, figure-tézigue, poto). J'espère que tu es néanmoins réjoui de demeurer mon pote.
THERE IS A GREAT DEPTH AND PROFUNDITY IN THIS PIANO INTERPRETATION. HARD TO CORRELATE WITH THAT DREADFUL PHOTOGRAPH ABOVE. I WISH I COULD SEE HIM PLAYING BECAUSE HIS MUSICIANSHIP IS EXTROARDINARY AND ENTERES THE ETHEREAL SPIRITUAL RHELM.
Vision très spéciale de par les tempi qui met Trifo en marge de ses confrères; Tout est décortiqué en ciselés admirablement musicaux, mais à jouer de la lenteur, trop c'est trop et cela devient lassant même si le 3° mvt (pourtant le moins intéressant) apporte un peu de vie. Globalement, j'ai du mal à comprendre cette conception d'un tel chef d'oeuvre même si le suivi de sa pensée aide à la comprendre.
Je ressens la même chose, même si je ne considère jamais les tempi trop larges. C'est un examen approfondi de l'émotion et de la psychologie fait par un jeune homme ; J'espère sincèrement entendre son interprétation de cette œuvre lorsqu'il sera dans sa cinquième décennie.
@@MrKurtank ...de là à ne jamais considérer les tempi qui demeurent la vie de la musique et la base de tout phrasé... mais je disais bien que le suivi de sa pensée aide à la comprendre. Et puis (syndrome du Grand Erg) à trop approfondir on s'enlise comme mon idole Richter dans la D 960. Heureusement qu'ici on n'a pas de barre de reprise ! Dans 20 ans il l'aura refaite 5 ou 10 fois et donc essayé d'autre visions; celle-ci pour l'instant n'en fait pas, de loin, ma version N° 1.
@@MrKurtank Cela dit, quelles que soient nos préférences personnelles pour tel ou tel tempo ou même l'importance qu'on lui attache, il reste pour moi fondamental de respecter les intentions de l'auteur; surtout lorsqu'elles sont aussi foisonnantes et précises dans tous les domaines (phrasé-dynamique-style et notamment tempi (11 différents dans le seul 3° mv); lorsque SR attaque ce 3° à d=100, je n'admets pas que Trifo l'attaque à 63 pour jouer ensuite entre 72 et 84. Dommage, car la suite vaut le détour !
@@jehanbaze8367 Jehan, ta connaissance de la musique dépasse largement la mienne ; J'écoute sans comprendre. Parfois, il semble qu'un artiste jouera de la même manière... qui suis-je pour juger ?
@@MrKurtank Pourquoi dis-tu ça ?; il se trouve que j'ai la partition (et que je m'en sers hélas mais c'est un autre problème) SR y transcrit sa conception avec précision ce que je voulais simplement souligner. Après, nous ne sommes que des juges subjectuvistes de par nos ressentis, et sommes tous qualifiés pour les exprimer y compris les déplorables instrumentistes comme moi !.
As much as I love Rachmaninov's music, the First Sonata is the "most coherent" work he created. Trifonov obviously has the extraordinary technique to play it and I admire his work. I think this work requires a certain "sensitivity" to trying to find connecting elements and putting them together. Not all pianists can do this. Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)
painfully slow performance...to hold this enormous piece together you need to get through it in c. 35"....which is also just slow enough to hear all the gorgeous detail.
Alas, yeah...I debated about whether to keep it in but I didn't want to "doctor" the document, so-to-speak. I excuse the announcer for feeling even more overwhelmed that many of the commentators here because he heard it live -- something I could have done by buying the ticket that was available when I had the chance. Again alas, I did not, but I'm always grateful for the incredible musical resource that is BBC Radio 3.
I think that adds to the experience of anyone who listens and is the essence of live recording...not that I think for one moment that it is easy in the studio; but the effort you hear can put you there.
Love that. He is a god-like pianist, but the sense of struggle can be heard, that is what gives him humanity and increases his appeal. Even in performances so perfect, so sculpted, so immaculately delivered; some moments are too much for the brain to handle in that instant.
I don't think he struggles more than any other pianist of his caliber, he has amazing (although unorthodox-looking) technique. Him struggling is more about putting in all of his interpretative ideas, because he has so much of those. Even with something like Chopin's prelude in c minor, it still sounds like he's thinking about every note before he plays it, and in that piece it definitely hasn't got anything to do with technique
@@thingiezz I agree; despite the immense difficulty of this piece, I don't think a maestro such as Trifonov is really "struggling" with this piece on the technical side
0:20 1st movement
15:15 2nd
25:50 finale
thank you for that
Many Thanks bjames. (Else I might not have believed that the 3rd movement could be so long!).
And 41:15 The end of the Sonata.
42:52 'A little more'
The most understandable of interpretations of this complex sonata I have yet heard. Lovely. Thank you for the performance Daniil, and for the recording Mr K.
Bárbara Cohen. This Rachmaninov piece Sonata is coated in lustrous beauty. Trifonov brings out the color, with exhilarating grasp, yet the tenderness of the piece is on true display. He is a pianist in his own league, and every time I have heard him perform he teaches me something new and exciting about Rachmaninov. The work is long, can go on and on, but it Trifonov’s hands it is magic. Thank you.
I have never heard someone play the finale that way and it is absolutely beautiful, the interpretation is among the highest for me. The softness and care put into the entire piece is glamorous
Rachmaninov 🤍 in concert…
Live. Breathtaking.
Ciò che Trifonov ha fatto di questa sonata è incredibile! Colori struggenti, dinamiche che nemmeno Rachmaninov forse sapeva di aver scritto. Sicuramente esagero, ma vi assicuro che prima di fare questo commento ho voluto ascoltare ogni altra interpretazione della sonata 1, presente su you tube. Ebbene, fra le tante bellissime esecuzioni, non voglio propriamente dire che questa è la migliore, ma semplicemente ch'è un'altra cosa. Trifonov, sembra qui trarre ispirazione e alimento da mondi ultraterreni. Inoltre non credo esista a tutt'oggi una lettura del secondo movimento, che può soltanto avvicinarsi a quella di alta sensibilità qui presentata.
Concludo questo mio elogio, chiedendo scherzosamente a Trifinov dove ha però trovato lo spartito, perché in quello che ho io non scorgo neppure la metà delle indicazioni, tempi e dinamiche che lui presenta in questa sua performance. Probabilmente tocca avere i suoi occhi (e la sue mani) per farlo.
Un commento degno del pezzo, dell'interprete e dell'interpretazione.
Complimenti per il straordinario commento !!!!! Behh c’è poco da dire ,in questo mondo ci sono pianisti estremamente bravi !! ma per me TRIFANOV in questo momento è il miglior pianista dell’universo e 1000 anni avanti a tutti .. quando suona lui è come se il tempo è il mondo intero si fermasse ……🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼
о господи что он сделал в репризе финала.... а комментаторы разумеется как всегда не то что эту сонату никогда не играли или хотя бы не послушали десятка 2-3 исполнений, но и разумеется ноты сонаты никогда не видели, если вообще обучены нотной грамоте.
о Божечки... когда что-нибудь такое себе позволял пианист экстра класса вот я думаю.. какой нибудь Рихтер или Микаленджели такое бы сотворили, думаю ушли бы в монастырь.
причем эмоция у Трифонова то как раз совершенно верная, но извините всю эту музыку надо делать в то время которое автор имел в виду, а не.. не то что в 2 раза, а в 10 раз медленнее! пойду еще раз послушаю этот момент, когда еще такое услышишь ..
Saw Trifonov at Davies Symphony Hall, where we sought his caress, our auditory senses stirred, gentilly, exquisitely, letting Pleasure's subterfuge engulf the mass...
3rd Mov: This is how I could imagine Ivo Pogorelić playing it. Some very interesting things going on in here. Always nice to hear a fresh approach and Trifonov is the man to attempt such things and pull them off.
Well said, I thought exactly the same from around 37:46.
Pogo used to be good, but now...
@@cynic150 ... he is better
No doubt, Rachmaninoff loved writing in minor keys. Both piano sonatas and all four piano concertos in the minor key. Much more mysterious, exotic and exciting.
yet this sonata is the only one out of those 6 that ends in minor
Bravo Daniil! Qué bello Dios mío!
Pero me gusta verlo además de oirlo.
If nothing else, Trifonov is different. I do not think that he could have squeezed another ounce of emotion out of this even if he wanted to. He is a consummate performer, there is no doubt. He makes effects like no other. Ogdon is also very good.
Daniil makes --playing with that Form like a composer--simple & very cleare! It's UNIQUE,I finally understood everything in this Sonata!...In this Sonata's giving special Russian's "znamenni raspev",like in Rachmaninov's 3-th Concerto,its Rachmaninov special technique ! BRAVISSIMO, DANIIL!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
I don't know how many times I've played the 2nd movement...perhaps endless
Гений, так прекрасно исполнить это Произведение!!! Будь здоров и счастлив.
There are those..., that plenitude which are incapable of listening, thus thinking ...who lack appreciation, as Greatness plays that which is Great.
I can hear his breath
So very different. Really no comparison it's not the same the way he chose to play it. Still enjoyed it more of as a totally different piece
Interesting how he takes the beginning of the finale so slowly.
Yeah
I love it
wow how nice i did not like op. 28 but it is very nice now. love it.
It always depends of the Musician's 😅
Tanrı daima tebdil-i kıyafet gezer.
C'est la plus grande œuvre musicale jamais écrite
Ah ouah
@@lampadairevisqueux5247 ok.
@@happycreeper6923 Bah c'est une œuvre styléique, mais faut peut-être pas pousser Pierre Ménès dans la salle de sport
@@lampadairevisqueux5247 faut pas pousser non plus tes analyses dans leurs retranchements je pense.
@@happycreeper6923 Ah poto, c'est plutôt à toi de démontrer qu'il s'agit du truc le plus styléique qui se soit jamais introduit dans l'appareil auditif du tout-venant, plutôt qu'à moi de démontrer le contraire. Je ne peux pas prendre un bouquin au hasard, dire : "c'est le meilleur livre jamais écrit", et répondre à qui trouve cette considération excessive : "j'espère que tes géniteurs te déshériteront pour cette non-argumentation". Je dis ça bien que trouvant cette œuvre d'un styléisme immodéré (je la travaille en ce moment, figure-tézigue, poto). J'espère que tu es néanmoins réjoui de demeurer mon pote.
BRAVO!!!!
Wowowowowow
@@yechanjung5925 ❤️
우연히? 댓글 만나니 반갑네요~ ❤
Trifo! You're my Hero!
THERE IS A GREAT DEPTH AND PROFUNDITY IN THIS PIANO INTERPRETATION.
HARD TO CORRELATE WITH THAT DREADFUL PHOTOGRAPH ABOVE.
I WISH I COULD SEE HIM PLAYING BECAUSE HIS MUSICIANSHIP IS EXTROARDINARY AND ENTERES THE ETHEREAL SPIRITUAL RHELM.
Ron Walker you mean florestan? The guy with the stupid smile on his face ?
YOUR CAPS LOCK IS ON
what is the point of seeing his face?
Interesting to hear how the melody of Dies Irae appears.
Damn, I've never heard that there before, while I had listened to this piece a good amount of times. Thanks for pointing this out
Good listening about Dies Irae.
@@thingiezz i think you have it at the very end of the last mvmt
@@ediccartman7252 27:43 is the first appearance of the Dies Irae, at least that I notice.
increíble!
Vision très spéciale de par les tempi qui met Trifo en marge de ses confrères; Tout est décortiqué en ciselés admirablement musicaux, mais à jouer de la lenteur, trop c'est trop et cela devient lassant même si le 3° mvt (pourtant le moins intéressant) apporte un peu de vie. Globalement, j'ai du mal à comprendre cette conception d'un tel chef d'oeuvre même si le suivi de sa pensée aide à la comprendre.
Je ressens la même chose, même si je ne considère jamais les tempi trop larges. C'est un examen approfondi de l'émotion et de la psychologie fait par un jeune homme ; J'espère sincèrement entendre son interprétation de cette œuvre lorsqu'il sera dans sa cinquième décennie.
@@MrKurtank ...de là à ne jamais considérer les tempi qui demeurent la vie de la musique et la base de tout phrasé... mais je disais bien que le suivi de sa pensée aide à la comprendre.
Et puis (syndrome du Grand Erg) à trop approfondir on s'enlise comme mon idole Richter dans la D 960. Heureusement qu'ici on n'a pas de barre de reprise !
Dans 20 ans il l'aura refaite 5 ou 10 fois et donc essayé d'autre visions; celle-ci pour l'instant n'en fait pas, de loin, ma version N° 1.
@@MrKurtank Cela dit, quelles que soient nos préférences personnelles pour tel ou tel tempo ou même l'importance qu'on lui attache, il reste pour moi fondamental de respecter les intentions de l'auteur; surtout lorsqu'elles sont aussi foisonnantes et précises dans tous les domaines (phrasé-dynamique-style et notamment tempi (11 différents dans le seul 3° mv); lorsque SR attaque ce 3° à d=100, je n'admets pas que Trifo l'attaque à 63 pour jouer ensuite entre 72 et 84. Dommage, car la suite vaut le détour !
@@jehanbaze8367 Jehan, ta connaissance de la musique dépasse largement la mienne ; J'écoute sans comprendre. Parfois, il semble qu'un artiste jouera de la même manière... qui suis-je pour juger ?
@@MrKurtank Pourquoi dis-tu ça ?; il se trouve que j'ai la partition (et que je m'en sers hélas mais c'est un autre problème)
SR y transcrit sa conception avec précision ce que je voulais simplement souligner.
Après, nous ne sommes que des juges subjectuvistes de par nos ressentis, et sommes tous qualifiés pour les exprimer y compris les déplorables instrumentistes comme moi !.
He’s breathing in and out according to the high points like a boxer ahahaha
That 3rd just killed me
Listen to this and study the PRINCIPLES OF COSMIC PSYCHOLOGY...
Lepiej nie można.Można inaczej.Czy wtedy będzie najlepiej ?
Very different from Tanya Gabrielian's interpretation. I don't think it's on RUclips, but I have it on CD, and it's my favorite performance.
existe una version por Vladimir Horowitz?
I do not know if there is an extant recording of Horowitz playing this piece, I could not find one (but I did not look very hard)
best interpretation of this piece that I have heard to date is by Ruth Laredo
K43TOC nooo me parece. Nadie lo hace mejor que Daniil Trifonov el grande
Santiago Rodriguez version is stunning
As much as I love Rachmaninov's music, the First Sonata is the "most coherent" work he created. Trifonov obviously has the extraordinary technique to play it and I admire his work. I think this work requires a certain "sensitivity" to trying to find connecting elements and putting them together. Not all pianists can do this.
Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)
By "sensitivity" do you mean 'sensitivity' or ""sensitivity""?
Anybody know what the encore is?
Skryabin, Prelude for left hand, Op.9
painfully slow performance...to hold this enormous piece together you need to get through it in c. 35"....which is also just slow enough to hear all the gorgeous detail.
"The Faust" ..Goethe
In the Finale movement's the Absolutely factures fragment of Future's Rachmaninov's 3-th Piano Concerto!
When this photo was taken Rach was already a very sick man. tragic
Don't know why but every time Trivonof is playing some really hard pieces I can hear how he struggles
This comment is up here 3 times, and now so is this reply.
26:30
Whoever doctored Rachmaninov's eyes should be ...
The commentary at the end 41:35 is just so cringe.
Alas, yeah...I debated about whether to keep it in but I didn't want to "doctor" the document, so-to-speak. I excuse the announcer for feeling even more overwhelmed that many of the commentators here because he heard it live -- something I could have done by buying the ticket that was available when I had the chance. Again alas, I did not, but I'm always grateful for the incredible musical resource that is BBC Radio 3.
Why don't they show Danill? The picture of Rachmaninoff is rather boring.
Luckily, the music is quite entertaining.
A pic of Rachmaninoff is never boring my man
The picture is marvelous.
not cool guys
Don't know why but every time Trivonof is playing some really hard pieces I can hear how he struggles
I think that adds to the experience of anyone who listens and is the essence of live recording...not that I think for one moment that it is easy in the studio; but the effort you hear can put you there.
They are HARD pieces !
This comment is up here 3 times, and now so is this reply.
Love that. He is a god-like pianist, but the sense of struggle can be heard, that is what gives him humanity and increases his appeal. Even in performances so perfect, so sculpted, so immaculately delivered; some moments are too much for the brain to handle in that instant.
Don't know why but every time Trivonof is playing some really hard pieces I can hear how he struggles
I don't think he struggles more than any other pianist of his caliber, he has amazing (although unorthodox-looking) technique. Him struggling is more about putting in all of his interpretative ideas, because he has so much of those. Even with something like Chopin's prelude in c minor, it still sounds like he's thinking about every note before he plays it, and in that piece it definitely hasn't got anything to do with technique
This comment is up here 3 times, and now so is this reply.
@@thingiezz I agree; despite the immense difficulty of this piece, I don't think a maestro such as Trifonov is really "struggling" with this piece on the technical side