Weibull Probability Plotting of complete data using median ranks with example

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 авг 2024
  • This video explains step-by-step procedure for probability plotting of failure data. Probability plotting is a technique used to determine whether given data of failures follows a distribution. The video also explains various types of failure data: complete, right censored, left censored and interval censored data. Viewers can try Weibull Probability Plotting to estimate shape parameter beta and scale parameter Eta. The video also shows how to estimate median rank for complete data.

Комментарии • 95

  • @sridharsdrawingbook6316
    @sridharsdrawingbook6316 3 года назад +1

    Very very useful sir. Not missed out a single point. The teaching flow is amazing for beginners. Thank you so much.

  • @gajananshiralkar9670
    @gajananshiralkar9670 3 года назад +2

    This is best video for weibull in you tube.

  • @candycandy319
    @candycandy319 3 года назад +3

    Thank you! finally get how all these come together

  • @sangram0403
    @sangram0403 Год назад +1

    Very nice video. Explained well about the weibull plotting and finding shape parameter.

  • @dartagnandebatz3304
    @dartagnandebatz3304 4 года назад

    So well explained Mr. Urdhwareshe!, thank you so much.

  • @fourierrocket
    @fourierrocket 4 года назад

    Thank you for thia video.
    It answered all of my questions on how to perform Weibull plotting.
    Best Regards

  • @MrNikhilshenoy
    @MrNikhilshenoy 3 года назад +1

    Brilliant explanation!

  • @momoabdul2755
    @momoabdul2755 4 года назад +1

    Thank you for making this video.

  • @titox7754
    @titox7754 3 года назад +1

    Thank you very much! It was extremely useful!

  • @ruchirshrivastava6638
    @ruchirshrivastava6638 2 года назад

    Excellent video sir. True Help.

  • @yfc631
    @yfc631 3 года назад +1

    All heroes are not wearing cap.. 👏👏👏👍

  • @sunnyj1967
    @sunnyj1967 Год назад +1

    This simply brilliant.

  • @mohamedabdelrahman169
    @mohamedabdelrahman169 Год назад +1

    Very useful video... thank you

  • @dartagnandebatz3304
    @dartagnandebatz3304 4 года назад

    So, so well explained, thank so much !!!

  • @seshansesha7645
    @seshansesha7645 2 месяца назад +1

    Thank you

  • @drpyne4628
    @drpyne4628 4 года назад +1

    Thanks! Nice presentation

  • @luciandersonmarquesferreir1165

    Thanks Mr. Hemant.

  • @jonmoore8995
    @jonmoore8995 2 года назад +1

    Very good. Please also do video of theory behind median rank.

  • @snehalpatil8788
    @snehalpatil8788 3 года назад +1

    Thanks for video !

  • @ramachandramurthyjakkula7561
    @ramachandramurthyjakkula7561 3 года назад +1

    TQ VERY MUCH FOR THE VIDEO

  • @gyanchandrakushwaha8604
    @gyanchandrakushwaha8604 5 лет назад +1

    Great Explanation

  • @chekradoua
    @chekradoua 4 года назад

    thank you for all you presentation

  • @TheSanthoshteja
    @TheSanthoshteja 4 года назад +1

    Thank you so much Sir

  • @mutiardini
    @mutiardini 4 года назад

    thank you for your explanation

  • @nicolaswiles3236
    @nicolaswiles3236 4 года назад +1

    Very helpful, thanks!

  • @candycandy319
    @candycandy319 4 года назад +1

    very helpful

  • @yfc631
    @yfc631 3 года назад +1

    Sir u just osm

  • @parviz1961
    @parviz1961 3 года назад

    Thank you very much!

  • @ranjanpal7217
    @ranjanpal7217 Год назад +1

    Very nice video...CAn we estimate weibull parameters by Python?

    • @uhemant1
      @uhemant1 Год назад

      Thanks. I am not a Python user. If I learn, I will try. But I am sure, it is possible.

  • @tensioattivo86
    @tensioattivo86 6 месяцев назад

    I cannot understand last logarithm plot... and method to calculate beta

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  6 месяцев назад

      The x-axis of the probability plot is logarithm of time t and the leftmost point is 10. Also, to determine beta i. e. shape parameter, you need to draw a parallel line to the plotted line passing through the 63.2% point as shown and read the beta parameter value from the scale shown at the top.

  • @mohammedali7335
    @mohammedali7335 3 года назад

    HOW CAN WE DIFFERENTIATE WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION ,NORMAL,AND EXPONENTIAL FROM GIVEN RELIABILITY DATA?

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  3 года назад

      Watch our other videos for this:
      ruclips.net/video/JuQ_AEtj1vE/видео.html
      ruclips.net/video/wBG9POVWjRc/видео.html

  • @ArjunSharma-wi3jp
    @ArjunSharma-wi3jp 10 месяцев назад

    HI SIR , IW ANT TO KNOW WHY DO PEOPLE PLOT LN(LM 1-/1-F(x))ON X AXIS AND GET THE MODULUS

  • @joshuagodwins5386
    @joshuagodwins5386 4 года назад +2

    thank you for the explanation! I'm curious what to do if we get a data set where some of the items are still running, do you exclude them from the data as they haven't failed or do you carry on as usual

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  4 года назад

      You should include it as censored data. If an item is running, it is right censored data.

    • @alinecristinapin
      @alinecristinapin 4 года назад

      Estou aprendendo a manusear o programa. Estou com algumas dúvidas .Tenho um modelo de exemplo na qual não possuo os valores para ser inserido somente o valor de Beta, n e Y. No modelo pede para utilizar o modelo Weibull Mista 3 subpop. Possui uma fórmula também. Se optar pela opção Definida pelo usuário consigo inserir a equação, porém não localizo a opção de inserir os meus parâmetros Beta, n e Y.

  • @shiguoliu7914
    @shiguoliu7914 3 года назад

    if two failure have the same failure cycles, that meant there are two failure have same rank, how to handle this case? thanks

  • @sudhansugrahacharya7094
    @sudhansugrahacharya7094 2 года назад

    Sir how can we apply it in estimating three parameter weibull distribution

  • @mukulpandey8445
    @mukulpandey8445 4 года назад

    Hi very nice explanation. I am interested to on failure forecast using Weibull, the data set i have got have different failure mode (electrical/ mechanical) of a pump failure. how can we combine them together to get a Weibull distribution for system failure and then use it for failure forecast? appreciate your insight on the problem

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  4 года назад

      Different failure modes should not be combined and analysed separately for each failure mode. Minitab supports analysing multiple failure modes in single command. In case you need help, please send email on hemant@world-class-quality.com.

  • @md.hazratali6796
    @md.hazratali6796 4 года назад +1

    good job! can you suggest any good explanatory reference book ?

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  4 года назад

      Thank you! There are many good reference books. The one that Ilike is by Patrick O'Connor. Ebelling's book is also good.

  • @mohabelshazly5653
    @mohabelshazly5653 4 года назад

    Thank you very much for the Video, very helpful, i have a Question regarding this, i have set of data of replacement times only for main components of a System, can i apply MRR to These data in order to calculate the weibull Parameters? thank you in Advance.

  • @sridharsdrawingbook6316
    @sridharsdrawingbook6316 3 года назад

    Sir,
    Can we use the minitab version for accelerated testing and life estimation of explosive sample?
    Example:-
    Different samples of same explosive fail at different times at constant accelerated temperature. Can I use Arrhenius weibull distribution to predict their life at usable temperature?
    One of your lectures well predicted the life of other components at various temperatures. Request guidance and suggestions in case of explosives.
    Thank you so much in advance.
    Regards

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  3 года назад +1

      Thanks for asking a very good and interesting question. The answer needs to be evolved. You need to define what is a failure. If this is predominantly result of temperature, Arrhenius model could be appropriate. If there is some other stress, Eyring Model may be better. Also, analysis is possible if you are doing testing at three different temperatures. Please write to me on hemant@world-class-quality.com for more detailed discussion.

    • @sridharsdrawingbook6316
      @sridharsdrawingbook6316 3 года назад

      @@instituteofqualityandrelia7902 Thank you so much sir. I've set the similar failure criteria at three different temperatures for ALT much higher than usage temperature . I followed your tutorial on MINITAB. I'll wait till all the samples fail.
      I wanted to try this method as not much literature available on predicting life of explosive samples using this method.
      Thank you for the postive thought and push. It will be very interesting if the results are compared with traditional methods.
      I would forward the results in mail. Request your guidance whenever free for any corrections in procedure and assumptions. It would be a great help.
      Regards,
      Sridhar

  • @onlytruth9321
    @onlytruth9321 3 года назад

    Sir what are the advantages of different kind of distributions? (But we already know that for variable failure rate we need Weibull and for constant failure rate e need exponential distribution. ) is there any other advantages??

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  3 года назад

      Hello 'Only Truth',
      We need to choose distribution that fits our data. It is like a shirt. If I need XL size, I should not buy L size. Both shirts are good for persons whom these fit well! Also, remember that Exponential is a special case of Weibull with beta=1.

  • @mohkarim4384
    @mohkarim4384 4 года назад

    thank you sir please
    please how to estimate beta and alph i have parameter of weibull
    axe x=TBF=1907
    ,1913,1933,1949,1964,1980,2028,2030,2039,2069,2092 with hour (h)
    axe y= F(i) median rank% = 15,13,20,28,35,43,50,57,65,72,80,87,95

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  4 года назад

      Thanks for your keen interest! You sample size is 11. I assume that all are failures, so this is a complete data. So the median ranks that I see are 6.1, 14.8......., 93.9. The median ranks indicated by you seem to be incorrect. See link www.weibull.com/GPaper/ranks10_13.htm. If you fit two-parameter Weibull, the shape parameter is 36.8. However, three prameter Weibull is probably better with shape about 1.4, scale 117, and Failure free life as 1888. I checked this on Minitab with LSXY. Email me for more discussion on hemant@world-class-quality.com.

  • @vaibhavidige6869
    @vaibhavidige6869 4 года назад

    Thank you sir for this video. Can you please help me out for plotting weibull curves in excel based on service life prediction of building data. Plotting of Condition index vs.Time in years

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  4 года назад

      Hello Vaibhavi Dige, Appreciate your interest!
      Please inform more details of your problem and data to me. My email id is hemant@world-class-quality.com.
      Good luck!
      Hemant

  • @ArunKumar-eu4sc
    @ArunKumar-eu4sc 4 года назад

    Is it required to rank the censored data points also.. my sample have many components still running in the field ?

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  4 года назад

      Thanks for your question and interest. The censored data is used to sort the data. However, its median rank is not calculated and plotted. But it changes the median rank. In this video, I have explained Weibull plotting for only complete data. Apologise for some delay in my reply.

  • @alaeddinesel7891
    @alaeddinesel7891 4 года назад

    I need a program that defines parameter weibull at paper weibull

  • @orhansargul5000
    @orhansargul5000 2 года назад

    ı need to ask you a question

  • @alaaisraa9459
    @alaaisraa9459 3 года назад

    Thank you for this video, please I have a question, how do we estimate the failure function, if I have the number of data exactly 20

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  3 года назад +1

      I believe you mean the median rank for 20. You can either use median rank tables for n=20 or use the formula (j-0.3)/(n+0.4) as shown in the video.