@@Astrot1 For me it is easier since the position is mostly athletic/physical. Intangibles like vision and that stuff can get developed at the next level
@@Astrot1 Exactly. If I work for a school i am trusting my position coaches to develop the actual football skills. One thing I have seen come up though is hands. It is hard for me to gauge a kids hands at the HS level when he isn't catching 70 mph lasers. I like keeping it at 6 traits because any more would make it a bit more complicated. The final score it spits out isn't an end all be all but just gives me a (subjectively) objective number to compare recruits at.
I’m just gonna be real. This kid will not see much of the field at Auburn. He plays for a 1A school. He is a “big fish in a little pond” situation. This kid wouldn’t be starting at any school higher than 4A.
Need to check out sophomore Landen Williams Callis the next Barry Sanders
RBs are hella hard to gauge i’m not gonna lie
@@Astrot1 For me it is easier since the position is mostly athletic/physical. Intangibles like vision and that stuff can get developed at the next level
@ that’s fair, at this stage ur just looking at tools in every position to be fair. I think u should add a 7 though
@@Astrot1 Exactly. If I work for a school i am trusting my position coaches to develop the actual football skills. One thing I have seen come up though is hands. It is hard for me to gauge a kids hands at the HS level when he isn't catching 70 mph lasers. I like keeping it at 6 traits because any more would make it a bit more complicated. The final score it spits out isn't an end all be all but just gives me a (subjectively) objective number to compare recruits at.
I’m just gonna be real. This kid will not see much of the field at Auburn. He plays for a 1A school. He is a “big fish in a little pond” situation. This kid wouldn’t be starting at any school higher than 4A.
@@BoogerBrains1987 I get your point, but wouldnt be starting???!!!
@@kingcoldsportswouldn’t be starting for a 5A,6A, or 7A.