It's a interesting card, Drivers suck ass but when it works the A750 is considerable faster than the RX 6600 while only costing ~20,- more. It still draws more power but I'm curious how well it'll run in 2026.
@@zoopa9988 haven’t had any issues with drivers outside of actually getting it to have a functioning display output when I built the pc, got mine for 180 on sale new. Beats a 3060 so I’m happy with it, wish it came in more colors though.
ngl what a great year to build/upgrade a PC seeing how today state of affordable PC hardware. saw today's latest driver of A750 got in the same average as RX6600
I dont what happened to my arc 750 while playing "ready or not"(on dx12) while I only get 45 fps and I report it on dev and I check and update the driver few moments after I restart(it auto restart after update) the game it became smooth from 45 to 120 fps my mind is blown, The reason I buy arc 750 is very compatible for intel i5 13gen F
yeah intel drivers are really new so their constantly improving to be more compatible with new games and running better, which i why im gonna go for arc cause im going to upgrade later this yesr and hopefully it will perform better than a rx 6600 by then
A750 is the cheapest. The editor said $200 against $220. But today RX 6600 is more expensive. Rtx is another lvl for me it should be a comparison against RTX3050 8Gb. 3060 has 12gb. Ray tracing is still a problem for Arc, I dont know if can be resolved just with driver improvement, the hardware maybe needs a bit more attention. In terms of efficiency RX is a beast, if psu is a problem Rx must be considered.
Both the GPU's are almost the same price in my region so it will really helpful how your current experience is with the intel arc a750. Btw, Is the recording software stutter on the intel a750 fixed now? And is the performance on par or better than rx 6600?
the a750 is consuming as much power as the rtx 3060 despite being made with a much better fabrication process at TSMC while also performing worse in most titles. wtf. still a long way to go for team blue gpus
True, but I didn't really expect that much from a first-gen product. AMD also faced similar struggles at first, and it took them a while too before they become a viable competitor. ARC does seem promising though, some Battlemage leaks (next gen architecture) on mobile showed that it performed 25% better, despite the model having less than half the cores and 20% lower clock speeds, yet drew less than 40% of the power(Although these are just leaks, we need to wait to see the final product). I disagree when i think ARC will not be a success, but yeah they definitely still have a long way to go before they actually start taking serious amounts of market share. Keep in mind, AMD has been fighting NVIDIA in the dGPU market for nearly 2 decades at this point, yet they still have
@@emanoel1237 Nos preços atuais na kabum, qual compensa mais? Rx6600 da powercolor sumiu e a eagle é mais cara. A 3060 é de 8gb e a arc 750 estão com preços iguais praticamente.
So....I have a conundrum that brought me here. I built a rig 3 months back that uses an a750 paired with a 13600k. I just had a gaming friend pass away and his mom wanted to sell his gaming stuff......our gaming group went in and bought the stuff and I ended up with his PC which has a Gigabyte 3060 ti 12 gb. Should I swap the GPU in his old system into mine and my GPU into his if I plan on using his as a file server and backup PC?
if it's a free upgrade absolutely, the nvidia card has dlss which looks way better than other upscaling methods. dlss balanced looks better than fsr quality, there's just no competition in that department
It is on a superior process node. RTX 3000 uses Samsung 8nm, while ARC Alchemist uses TSMC 6nm. Also the architecture is slightly more optimized. Still not as good as the RX 6000 efficiency though.
at the time of recording, intel's recording software had lots of bugs, the one saw in the video was one of those bugs. but i havent tested any intel GPUs in a while. the issues might be fixed.
DOSBox doesn't work with the Arc cards anymore in Windows 10, since about 3 months ago with driver 4676. I really like my Arc a750 a lot, but I have a lot of old games from GOG and Steam that depend on DOSBox working. From what I've read Intel is dismissive of this problem, and may never fix it, so I'll have to eventually switch back to my AMD card, can't stay with the old Arc driver forever just to have DOSBox work. If you don't need DOSBox, then the Arc is a great card. EDIT: Intel's new Arc drivers have Dosbox working again in Windows 10/11.
How is that tarkov got the lowest avg fps on the Rx 6600? I thought it was a cpu heavy game yet it performed better on the other cards and not the 6600😮
consuming high power like a 3060 but performance scale is so different between games, that card is sucks at some games and works perfect at some games. That means intel drivers still not good enough. But yeah like you said they are trying and improving, cant wait to see next gen intel gpus and drivers.
A750 is continuously improving. But its still has a long way to go in terms of stability and optimization. For me the rx 6600 is the best value between these 3.
Total sonuçların toplamında Arc a750 gerçekten iyi bir sonuç vermiş. 1-2 oyun için kıyaslama yapmak adil olmaz. Ama fiyat/performans ürünü olarak bence de A750 !
entre RX 6600 e Arc 750 eu iria de "ARC" porque ela ainda tem muito a oferecer, futuramente talvez em 1 ano ou mais os seus drivers vão melhorar bastante e vai extrair todo o potencial que essa placa tem a oferecer pelas suas especificações e litografia menor, ja a RX 6600 ja esta com os drivers bem otimizados so não para raytracing
@@JegsTV cause those games were not optimized for Intel and they the publishers even stated that as well. Starfield being the major one to put out a statement on it. So again why test the games known not to be incompatible with Intel arc?
@pbd6488 Again, those "games" run fine on nvidia and amd products so why should intel be an exception? Its Intel who needs to step up. Its not the job of developers to make their game run fine on intel's product. Rather its intel's job to make sure their hardware run fine on games. Tbf intel recently entered the GPU market and still has a long way to go compared to nvidia and amd. But they are improving.
@@РодионБобров-в2л Посмотрел, как была огрызком, так и осталась. Чуть лучше стала себя чувствовать в 3D mark и rdr2, а в остальном все так же слабее rx 7600 и rtx 2080👀
![OsamaSon - ik what you did last summer [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4DIQDnu3mr4/mqdefault.jpg)
![KAYTRANADA - Witchy (feat. Childish Gambino) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jGK3YVmGZ3Y/mqdefault.jpg)
But just look at the wattage the rx 6600 takes. Incredible efficiency.
yes, but do take note that radeon rx 6000 series only reports chip wattage and not board wattage, the board wattage should be around 120 watts
4060 110w
@@shrajjk 4060 is not a $200 budget
@@eduram 4060 is more powerful but the power consumption is the same
@@eduram In my country 6600 costs from $260, 4060 from 340
that Arc A750 sure is a nice Cyberpunk card, especially for the price!
A little bit of improvements from a driver point of view and the a750 will eat Alice those 2 cards, (thing that happen already in some game)
@@salvocampoliso should I buy a rx 6650 xt or an arc a750
I have seen arc a750 being able to beat rx7600(equal to rx6700) several times .
@@rudradhyani8090 where?
@@jupsilvam gamer nexus
Paid 200 for my a750 OC edition, have absolutely no complaints and can’t wait to see how far it’ll go before I decide to build a new setup again.
It's a interesting card, Drivers suck ass but when it works the A750 is considerable faster than the RX 6600 while only costing ~20,- more. It still draws more power but I'm curious how well it'll run in 2026.
@@zoopa9988 haven’t had any issues with drivers outside of actually getting it to have a functioning display output when I built the pc, got mine for 180 on sale new. Beats a 3060 so I’m happy with it, wish it came in more colors though.
ngl what a great year to build/upgrade a PC seeing how today state of affordable PC hardware. saw today's latest driver of A750 got in the same average as RX6600
was the rx6600 unlocked through amd software to operate at full power? Mine shows 115w to 120w during gameplay.
It reports only voltage of chip, if you see 99-100. It is normal for this card to have 120w
6600 is the only 8GB card worth to buy in 2023
yes. got mine for 180usd brand new
@@Tembokhijau03o got mine last year $180 new last year too
No I think 6650 xt is better than 6600 and 3060 at the same price
@@PrashantKumar-ur6zm good for u if u get it with the same price lol
@@Tembokhijau03 bro go and check their is only difference of 2000 to 3000 which is worth it for 10 to 15 more fps
you can really tell which titles the intel team has focused on optimisations for, and which ones they haven't.
Finally a benchmark that includes tarkov, gigachad
An overclock on the 6600 is the best to do, it’s not hot and don’t use electricity
I dont what happened to my arc 750 while playing "ready or not"(on dx12) while I only get 45 fps and I report it on dev and I check and update the driver few moments after I restart(it auto restart after update) the game it became smooth from 45 to 120 fps my mind is blown, The reason I buy arc 750 is very compatible for intel i5 13gen F
Ya bro u will slowly get good performace in almost all games
yeah intel drivers are really new so their constantly improving to be more compatible with new games and running better, which i why im gonna go for arc cause im going to upgrade later this yesr and hopefully it will perform better than a rx 6600 by then
@@odiplol I saw the potential of an intel graphics card and I hope their investor gives some more budget to improve their card
A750 is the cheapest. The editor said $200 against $220. But today RX 6600 is more expensive. Rtx is another lvl for me it should be a comparison against RTX3050 8Gb. 3060 has 12gb. Ray tracing is still a problem for Arc, I dont know if can be resolved just with driver improvement, the hardware maybe needs a bit more attention. In terms of efficiency RX is a beast, if psu is a problem Rx must be considered.
prices were accurate at the time of upload. prices change over time.
@@JegsTV you're correct!
Rtx 3060 was much behind of Rx 6600 in MW2 in the videos a year ago. What happened now?
That game in specific works extremely well for AMD GPUs, like Nvidia GPU's does for games with Raytracing performs better on those.
Both the GPU's are almost the same price in my region so it will really helpful how your current experience is with the intel arc a750.
Btw, Is the recording software stutter on the intel a750 fixed now?
And is the performance on par or better than rx 6600?
Why is a750 rig uses more cpu watt and %? That's weird..
Did you use new drivers and resizablr bar?
latest drivers at the time of upload. and yes, resizable bar is enabled.
A lot closer than I'd have expected, def excited to see what intel brings with their 2nd gen gpus
the a750 is consuming as much power as the rtx 3060 despite being made with a much better fabrication process at TSMC while also performing worse in most titles. wtf. still a long way to go for team blue gpus
also the a750's die is massive compared to the other two in the same price range. I can't imagine intel is making much money off of Arc
True, but I didn't really expect that much from a first-gen product. AMD also faced similar struggles at first, and it took them a while too before they become a viable competitor. ARC does seem promising though, some Battlemage leaks (next gen architecture) on mobile showed that it performed 25% better, despite the model having less than half the cores and 20% lower clock speeds, yet drew less than 40% of the power(Although these are just leaks, we need to wait to see the final product). I disagree when i think ARC will not be a success, but yeah they definitely still have a long way to go before they actually start taking serious amounts of market share. Keep in mind, AMD has been fighting NVIDIA in the dGPU market for nearly 2 decades at this point, yet they still have
Otimo video!! Como sempre a 6600 é a melhor. Aqui no brasil ela custa uns 240 dolares já as outras duas tão na casa dos 370 dolares
pero la 3060 es mejor
@@robcharl3sMas não é 130$ melhor haha
@@xavierjunior5140 Irmão, tem uma 3060 custando apenas uns 300 reais mais caro que os preços promocionais da rx 6600.
@@emanoel1237 Nos preços atuais na kabum, qual compensa mais? Rx6600 da powercolor sumiu e a eagle é mais cara. A 3060 é de 8gb e a arc 750 estão com preços iguais praticamente.
@@HiranMarialva Eu iria de 3060 por conta dos drivers. A ARC é superior a 3060, porém, os drivers fazem ela performar igual ou pior em muitos jogos.
So....I have a conundrum that brought me here. I built a rig 3 months back that uses an a750 paired with a 13600k. I just had a gaming friend pass away and his mom wanted to sell his gaming stuff......our gaming group went in and bought the stuff and I ended up with his PC which has a Gigabyte 3060 ti 12 gb. Should I swap the GPU in his old system into mine and my GPU into his if I plan on using his as a file server and backup PC?
if it's a free upgrade absolutely, the nvidia card has dlss which looks way better than other upscaling methods. dlss balanced looks better than fsr quality, there's just no competition in that department
How is a750 using less power than rtx3060!? I saw a750 was wildly inefficient
It is on a superior process node. RTX 3000 uses Samsung 8nm, while ARC Alchemist uses TSMC 6nm. Also the architecture is slightly more optimized. Still not as good as the RX 6000 efficiency though.
@@auritro3903 i see
hey Jegs!
I just want to know which will be better if the price is exactly same?
These 3 GPUs all at the same price? 3060.
@@JegsTV and what abt between the rx6600 and a750?
@@JegsTV and what about rx 6600 and arc a750?
Where's processor-videocard balance?
1:30 i dont understand what you meant by the gpus recording software, can you explain a little pls?
at the time of recording, intel's recording software had lots of bugs, the one saw in the video was one of those bugs.
but i havent tested any intel GPUs in a while. the issues might be fixed.
@@JegsTV ahhh okay ty!
DOSBox doesn't work with the Arc cards anymore in Windows 10, since about 3 months ago with driver 4676. I really like my Arc a750 a lot, but I have a lot of old games from GOG and Steam that depend on DOSBox working. From what I've read Intel is dismissive of this problem, and may never fix it, so I'll have to eventually switch back to my AMD card, can't stay with the old Arc driver forever just to have DOSBox work. If you don't need DOSBox, then the Arc is a great card. EDIT: Intel's new Arc drivers have Dosbox working again in Windows 10/11.
Which driver versions were used for this video?
He is reusing the same old trash video footage of the Intel ARC so same old drives from 11 months ago.
Lmao nope. All footage used here were new.
If you can prove that the footage used here are old ones. I'll paypal you 100 usd. Get to it.
Driver versions:
Nvidia: 545.74
AMD: 23.10.2
Intel: 31.0.101.4900
for price to perfromance arc gpu is better even for multitasking
for price to gaming and efficiency it is amd
for price to rtx it is nvidia
How is that tarkov got the lowest avg fps on the Rx 6600? I thought it was a cpu heavy game yet it performed better on the other cards and not the 6600😮
will asrock rx6600 have the same performance? sorry im new to the pc world ;;;;
Yes all models give the same performance, i have the asrock 6600 it's great and cool
What happened with BDO? I have 120 fps with that setup at least?
Are you using ultra mode? High texture?
At least intel tried giving something that is quiet competitive
consuming high power like a 3060 but performance scale is so different between games, that card is sucks at some games and works perfect at some games. That means intel drivers still not good enough. But yeah like you said they are trying and improving, cant wait to see next gen intel gpus and drivers.
ty so much this helps me alot
thanks, Dude !
Sam IS on in the RX 6600?
According to you which gpu offers the best value for money/performance?
To me it's the A750!
A750 is continuously improving. But its still has a long way to go in terms of stability and optimization. For me the rx 6600 is the best value between these 3.
Total sonuçların toplamında Arc a750 gerçekten iyi bir sonuç vermiş.
1-2 oyun için kıyaslama yapmak adil olmaz.
Ama fiyat/performans ürünü olarak bence de A750 !
No@@ibrahimperktas9057
I hope it is a joke. RX6600 is the better value for money.
entre RX 6600 e Arc 750 eu iria de "ARC" porque ela ainda tem muito a oferecer, futuramente talvez em 1 ano ou mais os seus drivers vão melhorar bastante e vai extrair todo o potencial que essa placa tem a oferecer pelas suas especificações e litografia menor, ja a RX 6600 ja esta com os drivers bem otimizados so não para raytracing
one good compare would be the 7600, A750, 4060 ti (8gb) resolutin at 1080 - 1440 - 2160|(4k) in low, high, maybe in ultra
Thank you so much ✅✌🏼
Surely u didn't uograde the drivers on Arc 750..
I used the latest drivers.
Look at the cpu usuage by intel ARC A750 copared to others.
A750 rebar on or off?
You’re playing on some of the games that are known to be incompatible with the arc gpus so why test those games at all I can’t take this serious.
Stop blaming those games and blame intel. They work fine on nvidia and amd so why should intel be an exception? Curb down your fanboyism mate.
@@JegsTV cause those games were not optimized for Intel and they the publishers even stated that as well. Starfield being the major one to put out a statement on it. So again why test the games known not to be incompatible with Intel arc?
@pbd6488 Again, those "games" run fine on nvidia and amd products so why should intel be an exception? Its Intel who needs to step up. Its not the job of developers to make their game run fine on intel's product. Rather its intel's job to make sure their hardware run fine on games.
Tbf intel recently entered the GPU market and still has a long way to go compared to nvidia and amd. But they are improving.
Comparativo and Ray traincing
arc750 perform better on intel systm
Arc 750 is still a first gen and not optimized in some games yet
His rebar was off in other benchmarks it does way better with rebar
what is rebar?@@totoriel
4g decoding, rebar, sam was enabled. Dont believe the other comment.
@@JegsTV jit my a380 does better then your a750
Sure.
U should have used the 8gbs 3060 to make it more fair
I dont have the 8gb variant of the 3060. Hard to find in my area
@@JegsTV I see
8gb 3060 is more like a 3050/2060 due to the cut down memory bus and less cache
@@NGreedia but closer value and probably power draw
Bro RTX 3060 $250, send me 10 please
www.newegg.com/zotac-geforce-rtx-3060-zt-a30600f-10p/p/1FT-000M-00376
thank you
Not true arc 750 nice play games , cs2 not lag
The lag was due to the recording software bro. The a750 had decent fps.
@@JegsTV maybe old drivers ? my cs2 works perfectly with a huge FPS .
@@clawhammersotov7736 nope latest drivers.
there were jerks in your cs2 video ! some twitching . Is this a video capture problem or is that how your intel arc750 game works ?@@JegsTV
Explained in the vid itself bro.
Definitely A750
256 bit card for nothing :D
Come on obvious rtx 3060 is king.
rx 6600 is wayy cheaper and not too much behind in performance so the price to performance is considerably better in rx 6600
@@thebonelesskeleton how about the durability of rx6600? can it surpass 3060's durability?
@@lwrncepts lotery
@@lwrnceptsit last more than 3060 I didn’t need run upscaling on every game on my rx 6600
@@Ghostlynotme445 thanks for the feedback, will buy one tomorrow.
Arc 750 какой-то неясный огрызок😮
То в ногу с остальными шагает(редко), то значительно уступает, то чуть лучше...
Страшно такое брать😢
2 месяца назад тесты были. Посмотри сегоднишние.
@@РодионБобров-в2л Посмотрел, как была огрызком, так и осталась.
Чуть лучше стала себя чувствовать в 3D mark и rdr2, а в остальном все так же слабее rx 7600 и rtx 2080👀
@@PRO100Poxyu сколько стоят твои ссаные 2080 и 7600?
@@PRO100Poxyu rtx 2080 не имеет смысла покупать, так как есть та же 3060 на 12 гб, есть 3060ti. A770 на 16 гб.