One thing I've started recognizing recently is when someone is "Chapter" talking and something changes the channel in the middle of the chapter. It's like it puts the Chapter talker on pause hoping to get back on track. There's a very specific recognizable vibe to it
Yeah, and when I change channels on someone mid-sentence I fully expect them to go back to what they were saying after I add my bit. I'm usually surprised when they don't.
If we're talking about something and I haven't finished yet saying what I wanted to say, but someone changes the subject, I often after some time still mention what I wanted to say/finish what I wanted to say, even if people have moved on to another topic.
+@@kristy. a theory I'm toying with is we're all trying to categorize the same things with mbti/socionics/mental health diagnoses/astrology.. It's all describing the same few things, we're all just trying to understand each other. None of these systems are real and all of them are real at the same time.
@@kindauncool Same! Everything is connected. Maybe if we feed an algorithm all this categorization about human personality we will have a universal system.
Ah, now I finally understand why my Oe friend and my Oe mom are so infuriating! The common theme when my friend and I are speaking is me, bringing up some topic I want to discuss in full, hoping to think about every angle of it, to get a clear picture of all the information and how it works. This in comparison to my friend, who will discuss the idea with me for maybe a minute, and then move to three different, unrelated topics. After she does this I usually try to pull back to the original discussion, and after maybe getting a sentence or two in, she derails the train of thought back to more random things. This sequence will happen two to three times before I feel annoying and eventually give up. This gets even MORE infuriating when I'm trying to argue a particular point, and she's changed the topic so many times that I don't even remember the point I was trying to argue anymore.
The same thing happens when me and my sister are talking. She is basically always trying to get us back on topic and all I’m doing is going on “this reminds me of” tangents
The solution is to recognize the pattern and accept it'll happen from the start lmao it's dumb to keep trying to same exact thing expecting a different result.. skill issue. Or maybe just talk to them? But that's not likely to help so go with the first.
"Like, I wanna go to Google, and just, ya know, calmly throw a trash can through a random window." -Dave Powers, 2020 I need this quote in a picture frame on my wall, I'm so dead😂😂😂😂
The end is amazing. And yes consume saviors definitely keep A TON of information inside, mostly because we don't value sharing or teaching unless it is directly applicable to the goal or process at hand.
If Dave is an INTJ with Ni as his leading function, then technically we could say he is an Observer-dom or should we say Perciever-dom? INTPerciever? (BTW, I'm not talking about Dave's type, I'm simply talking about that the introverted type letter codes final letter (J/P) does NOT reflect their dominant function).
I've just listened to "The Gospel Truth", from Hercules. And it sounds exactly how Oi people talk hahah - Let me tell about Hercules... - Honey, we'll take it from here - Ok, you go girls - So, our story actually began long time ago before Hercules was born... 😂
So.... I subscribe to this channel. I watch this channel. It's been quite a long time since I UNDERSTOOD much of what's being said on this channel, though. I must have missed a huge chunk of time where everything was explained. At this stage I tend to watch, laugh when they laugh, nod my head in agreement, then think, "What happened?" I'm the biggest idiot.
I read one Supreme Court case from beginning to end, because I was interested in the outcome. It was "Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission." First and only Supreme Court case I read. It actually was really interesting hearing the questionings and arguments. I had no idea what a Supreme Court case was like, but the judges ask really profound questions. They basically have to think about how the law will affect the nation as a whole, and all the implications that may occur because of that law. That's a lot of thinking!
"They basically have to think about how the law will affect the nation as a whole, and all the implications that may occur because of that law. That's a lot of thinking!" Are you serious? Maybe I should be a judge. Maybe all EPs and IJs should, too; it might help/force them to balance world and life.
Man, this channel changing makes so much since. This lady though! Drives me nuts when someone doesn't just answer a friggin question. Why does it have to be this life changing answer for everything. Like, ok Yoda...
@Mr. 8-Bit Doggo Yes! This type looks like they love having all the answers. I'd like to see what this lady looks like in a freak out state. I bet she'd rage over the way I fold my laundry.
Its as if she stopped learning in order to teach. I'd rather have Clearance Thomas as my judge - he is 1000 times more down to earth and humble. You know he know more about law than you do, but he doesn't hit you over the head with it. Like Oprah, such people are full of themselves.
Don't worry, Oi people find you just as annoying i guess. this is why we need to learn about all types imo, to develop a better understanding and growing as people.
LOL. At the end of the video, the whole time I was like, dude, just put in a comma and it’ll probably stfu. And when you said, “I’ll settle for a comma,” I was like, “you do that, sir.” 😂
Reminds me of a proverbial idiom from my childhood, "Quack Quack Quack Mr. Ducksworth." Judicial review is arguably the most powerful, yet the most overlooked aspect of the American government.
It's funny, as an INFP with Ne savior, Jordan Peterson's cadence with channel switching feels completely normal. It doesn't feel like he's channel switching so much as building an interconnected/nonlinear web of ideas that all relate back to the main point. It never occured to me that it could be annoying to try to follow lol
Agree. Also i don't know if youve noticed but it seems like many ST and SF types are annoyed/confused by Jordan Petersons answer to if God exists or not. Its likey cant comprehend that hes answering the question metaphysically and not litterally.
@1:38 "what were we talking about?" this is the line most often said when to Oes are in a conversation for any amount of time. You actually have to think to go back to a previous topic because now you are 5steps removed.
At 3:57 I think she answered the host's question just fine. Not in the way you expected it but she did answer the question. I understood her answer immediately. And I think her answer and the way she answered it was brilliant!
@@wannabehuman If I'm not mistaken, I think she meant that most non-lawyer people, if not all, and some lawyers lack the tenacity and the drive to read supreme court decisions from *beginning to end* As a judge, she has that. No, she has to have that! From the way she answered it, she shifted the focus from "what she, as a judge, has" to "what people has to have to be a judge". People would remember being told what they are not more than hearing what other people are. It's brilliant!
Is this a typical way of Ni users think? Where the "answer" to the "question" is only part of a system of "answers". and by answering it differently, it answers the question and the system? (dunno if that made sense, but thats my logic behind why she did what she did)
use a comma before your "pretty much." Or... or you could ignore the suggestion. Is your refusal to do so and your single observer rage a matter of temperament?
@@1mag1nat1venameI don't think you jumped the gun... his "rage" and refusal to use the grammar rules in writing drove me batty. Writing is different than talking b/c the audience can't hear intonation, pauses or inflection in writing as they can in watching a video. People need to use the damn grammar rules when writing so the audience can understand what the person "speaking" is trying to say when the audience can't see or hear the speech. The concept and why of grammar isn't that complicated to grasp, so the rage at its necessity seems childish to me.
I guess what's interesting to me, and what I'm still having a hard time understanding, is that I don't perceive people like JP as changing channels at all. My uncle is similar to JP and a pastor, and everyone I know is like, "When will Unc get to the point?" and I'm thinking, "You have to be patient." JP and Unc do eventually bring the point home, they just go around more berry bushes first. There have been occasions where I spoke with people who genuinely didn't seem to be able to hold the thread of a conversation in their heads. I really don't think JP is one of them.
Yeah this is an old comment but I agree. Jordan Peterson is straight up Ni, he is jumping around but everything he is talking about is in service to the starting conversation topic. My ENFP friend likes him but can't listen to him because the jumping around kills him. In my mind though, any Ni user should be able to follow him rather easily. Just my 2 cents though.
That's funny! I remember I was eavesdropping, and I was listening to an American woman talk to a woman from Japan. The American woman was surprised that the other woman had never seen The Wizard of Oz, so she then goes into describing the movie. She spends 15 minutes describing the movie, and she doesn't even get to the part where Dorothy gets to Oz. My brain was baffled! Like she is like, it's about a girl, and she lives on a farm, and she has these family members, and goes into great detail about the family and the farm, and what the girl is like, and talks about the neighbor, and the gypsy caravan, etc. Literally spends 15 minutes talking about The Wizard of Oz, and she doesn't once mention the fact that the movie is about a young girl who ends up in the Land of Oz. The conversation ended because the bus came, but like I was thinking, this poor Japanese woman, now she thinks the Wizard of Oz is just about a boring movie about a girl who lives on a farm...It was total Chapter talking!
I don't think it is what chapter talking, it seems like just an over detailed explanation. Actually it might be Si but totally not Ni, Ni is about being less and more effective.
Listening to the Godspeed You! Black Emperor song Blaise Bailey Finnigan III, there is a really great field recording of what I presume to be an Ni single observer rant. It's awesome.
Interesting - you guys seem to have a very different cognitive processing - when Sonia Sotomayor spoke about the WHY and how it could be done BETTER, my eyes lit up - because that is EXACTLY what we should focus on! And yet you focused on something trivial about insignificant sensory items about circling text? Really? You totally missed the big picture point. The obvious take away is that all justices should think like her!
Nathan, you made my morning. I haven't laughed like that in a while. I'm sure Dave and Shanon understood the big picture of what Sonia was getting at. Though, I don't think you understood the big picture of what Dave and Shanon were getting at.
Ok so when i try ad solve a question in math but also on other topics i have a hard time knowing what the question is asking me, i usually read a few lines then start answering without carefully reading or understanding exaclty whats being asked so then i fail my exam. What's going on ? I know this means i have low consume and high blast but is ni/si involved? If so how? Any help would be really appreciated really need some other opinions
Love this analogy. Maybe talking about them and telling stories of our chapters (focusing on whatever your gendered letter is) will help that energy start to come out healthily
HAHAHAHA yeah I was gonna say you might need a comma. It’s like saying a separate sentence, and then you’re saying “pretty much” . Can you tell I use Si? Lol
I know this isn’t entirely related to this video, but I’ve been thinking about this for a few days. In relation to socionics, if you’re a jumper isfj, would that in turn mean that Te would lend itself to being a stronger function than Fe/Fi, just not as immediately valued? Could you perhaps do a video addressing this topic? Isfp, technically in socionics, of course.
I’m a chapter talker, my bf is a channel changer. I’ve noticed my bf *try* (emphasis here) to talk in chapters to me, he wants to make a specific point and he wants to back that point, but he somehow wanders completely off track and starts talking about something unrelated. Then he comes back to me asking what his original point was. He will do this physically too; he’ll set out to do something and I’ll find him 10 minutes later pacing around in a random room, having forgotten what he was doing. 90% sure he’s lead masculine Ne
If it's any consolation Dave people who have good grammar have this annoying habit of making all of their characters in a novel/podcast drama sound the same in terms of dialogue and inflection. So score 1 for you!
4:32 - 4:40 🤣 I challenge many blasters sometimes , but i don't go hard on them , because i feel bad if I destroy their view about the world , they will have nothing but emptiness and no purpose especially Si users , they just can't let go what they learn 🤣 , that why i prefer to let them do what they do :D hard true works..👍
Petersen does tend to ramble, but it is connected. He's all about mapping out very deep connections of ideas (wrote a book, Maps of Meaning). When you listen to him, or anyone for that matter, you have to let them ramble. This is why Joe Rogan is killing it. He lets people just talk. If you are so stuck on hearing someone talk about a certain topic and get impatient because they veer away, it's poor listening on your part.
It's funny, just over the weekend I was talking to my sister about how my life has chapters. and I went through all of the chapters of the last 10 years of my life. There were approximately 6-8 chapters. My chapters typically change when I start a new school, a new job, a new romantic relationship, or the end of a romantic relationship.
Guys, I gotta admit, the more I watch OP. The more I realize; we're actually different orders of a 4-animal personality type; the 32 types are just different flavors consisting of 16 classic MBTI (Vanilla, but actually just milk) + 16 jumpers (Vanilla + Chocolate, but actually chocolate milk); vanilla doesn't really exist, it's just an illusion!
I love you guys, but the swearing multiple times in a minute is offputting, especially peppering in the eff word. It's just not professional and makes it hard for me to refer others to your work. I try to overlook it for the sake of the message, but it detracts from the actual content, which is itself so layered and intriguing. I would love to see the two of you stop filling vocabulary in lazily with swear words and become more articulate in your speech. Not trying to be mean, but if your hope is to gain respect for Objective Personality, you're harming yourselves with the way you talk. Just save it for your personal conversations.
Don't be a hater now. What you're asking is for them not to be themselves. I thoroughly enjoy their occasional use of profanity. It makes them come off as more relatable. The value judgement that swearing isn't professional is a statement of your opinion and that same judgement is what makes it hard for you to refer others to their work. The cursing doesn't detract from the content at all, it's an intrinsic facet of the content. It may be off-putting to you, but that's not their problem. What you call ". . .filling vocabulary in lazily with swear words. . ." I say it's just them being themselves. I understand them completely and don't see a good reason why they would need to articulate more. You are in control of how you react to something. I'm sure you have the capacity to look past the cursing and focus on what's important instead of something that's trivial. It's not things that upset us, it's our judgment about things that upsets us.
One thing I've started recognizing recently is when someone is "Chapter" talking and something changes the channel in the middle of the chapter. It's like it puts the Chapter talker on pause hoping to get back on track. There's a very specific recognizable vibe to it
I like that. Then you can look for whether there's energy trying to get back to the chapter, or if they don't even blink
Yeah, and when I change channels on someone mid-sentence I fully expect them to go back to what they were saying after I add my bit. I'm usually surprised when they don't.
If we're talking about something and I haven't finished yet saying what I wanted to say, but someone changes the subject, I often after some time still mention what I wanted to say/finish what I wanted to say, even if people have moved on to another topic.
+@@kristy. a theory I'm toying with is we're all trying to categorize the same things with mbti/socionics/mental health diagnoses/astrology.. It's all describing the same few things, we're all just trying to understand each other. None of these systems are real and all of them are real at the same time.
@@kindauncool Same! Everything is connected. Maybe if we feed an algorithm all this categorization about human personality we will have a universal system.
as a Si when I start a sentence with 'first of all', all my friends know that there is going to be a lecture
Ah, now I finally understand why my Oe friend and my Oe mom are so infuriating!
The common theme when my friend and I are speaking is me, bringing up some topic I want to discuss in full, hoping to think about every angle of it, to get a clear picture of all the information and how it works. This in comparison to my friend, who will discuss the idea with me for maybe a minute, and then move to three different, unrelated topics. After she does this I usually try to pull back to the original discussion, and after maybe getting a sentence or two in, she derails the train of thought back to more random things. This sequence will happen two to three times before I feel annoying and eventually give up.
This gets even MORE infuriating when I'm trying to argue a particular point, and she's changed the topic so many times that I don't even remember the point I was trying to argue anymore.
FMWJROSF THIS LOWKEY SEEMS RUDE,, it happens with my ENTP sister and my mom who’s type i dont know
The same thing happens when me and my sister are talking. She is basically always trying to get us back on topic and all I’m doing is going on “this reminds me of” tangents
The solution is to recognize the pattern and accept it'll happen from the start lmao it's dumb to keep trying to same exact thing expecting a different result.. skill issue. Or maybe just talk to them? But that's not likely to help so go with the first.
Yay! We really got to see Shan’s low Blast in this one. Finally!
Can we please make a meme of Shan's masculine blast by taking a screenshot of Saitama's "You Talk too much" and Photoshop her head on top of it?
Chance
Sure. Do it.
1:44 "Channel Changing" with TWO REMOTES xD
Well that’s kind of how it works 😂 (as an enfp)
Dude i love Shan's reactions LOL she makes everything x2 funnier
"Like, I wanna go to Google, and just, ya know, calmly throw a trash can through a random window."
-Dave Powers, 2020
I need this quote in a picture frame on my wall, I'm so dead😂😂😂😂
The end is amazing. And yes consume saviors definitely keep A TON of information inside, mostly because we don't value sharing or teaching unless it is directly applicable to the goal or process at hand.
The end was an awesome example of IJ having an observer moment lol
If Dave is an INTJ with Ni as his leading function, then technically we could say he is an Observer-dom or should we say Perciever-dom? INTPerciever? (BTW, I'm not talking about Dave's type, I'm simply talking about that the introverted type letter codes final letter (J/P) does NOT reflect their dominant function).
I've just listened to "The Gospel Truth", from Hercules. And it sounds exactly how Oi people talk hahah
- Let me tell about Hercules...
- Honey, we'll take it from here
- Ok, you go girls
- So, our story actually began long time ago before Hercules was born...
😂
The end rant lmaoooo
So.... I subscribe to this channel. I watch this channel. It's been quite a long time since I UNDERSTOOD much of what's being said on this channel, though. I must have missed a huge chunk of time where everything was explained. At this stage I tend to watch, laugh when they laugh, nod my head in agreement, then think, "What happened?" I'm the biggest idiot.
LMFAO
The moment I get the notification for your new video i get so excited. I could literally watch new videos of yours all day, I love them
I read one Supreme Court case from beginning to end, because I was interested in the outcome. It was "Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission." First and only Supreme Court case I read. It actually was really interesting hearing the questionings and arguments. I had no idea what a Supreme Court case was like, but the judges ask really profound questions. They basically have to think about how the law will affect the nation as a whole, and all the implications that may occur because of that law. That's a lot of thinking!
"They basically have to think about how the law will affect the nation as a whole, and all the implications that may occur because of that law. That's a lot of thinking!"
Are you serious? Maybe I should be a judge. Maybe all EPs and IJs should, too; it might help/force them to balance world and life.
😂 These videos are the highlight of my week!!! 🤗❤️
Man, this channel changing makes so much since. This lady though! Drives me nuts when someone doesn't just answer a friggin question. Why does it have to be this life changing answer for everything. Like, ok Yoda...
That lady's there for a purpose, if it was just a regular conversation it would go down differently.
@Mr. 8-Bit Doggo Yes! This type looks like they love having all the answers. I'd like to see what this lady looks like in a freak out state. I bet she'd rage over the way I fold my laundry.
Its as if she stopped learning in order to teach. I'd rather have Clearance Thomas as my judge - he is 1000 times more down to earth and humble. You know he know more about law than you do, but he doesn't hit you over the head with it.
Like Oprah, such people are full of themselves.
@@austinbodiford6360 lolll
Don't worry, Oi people find you just as annoying i guess. this is why we need to learn about all types imo, to develop a better understanding and growing as people.
LOL. At the end of the video, the whole time I was like, dude, just put in a comma and it’ll probably stfu. And when you said, “I’ll settle for a comma,” I was like, “you do that, sir.” 😂
DAVE, just use a comma before the pretty much 🤣🤣 oh yay you got it!
Reminds me of a proverbial idiom from my childhood, "Quack Quack Quack Mr. Ducksworth." Judicial review is arguably the most powerful, yet the most overlooked aspect of the American government.
It's funny, as an INFP with Ne savior, Jordan Peterson's cadence with channel switching feels completely normal. It doesn't feel like he's channel switching so much as building an interconnected/nonlinear web of ideas that all relate back to the main point. It never occured to me that it could be annoying to try to follow lol
Agree. Also i don't know if youve noticed but it seems like many ST and SF types are annoyed/confused by Jordan Petersons answer to if God exists or not. Its likey cant comprehend that hes answering the question metaphysically and not litterally.
Lol "chapter the fuck out of it." Shan's cussing is on point in this one
Combine “chapter” with the boo boo report and you have a human I struggle to be around.
@1:38 "what were we talking about?" this is the line most often said when to Oes are in a conversation for any amount of time. You actually have to think to go back to a previous topic because now you are 5steps removed.
At 3:57 I think she answered the host's question just fine. Not in the way you expected it but she did answer the question. I understood her answer immediately. And I think her answer and the way she answered it was brilliant!
Kyrene Says wrong
What did she mean? Out of curiosity
@@wannabehuman If I'm not mistaken, I think she meant that most non-lawyer people, if not all, and some lawyers lack the tenacity and the drive to read supreme court decisions from *beginning to end* As a judge, she has that. No, she has to have that!
From the way she answered it, she shifted the focus from "what she, as a judge, has" to "what people has to have to be a judge". People would remember being told what they are not more than hearing what other people are. It's brilliant!
She answered it via exit. Not thru entrance..
She means the best quality of a judge is they consume all the info needed.
Is this a typical way of Ni users think? Where the "answer" to the "question" is only part of a system of "answers". and by answering it differently, it answers the question and the system? (dunno if that made sense, but thats my logic behind why she did what she did)
"It's pretty much the best of both worlds." I gotchu
Alternatively solutions:
It's the best of both worlds (pretty much).
It's the best of both worlds - pretty much.
This is one of my favorites
use a comma before your "pretty much." Or... or you could ignore the suggestion. Is your refusal to do so and your single observer rage a matter of temperament?
okay, you used the comma, at the last second. I jumped the gun. Sorry
@@1mag1nat1venameI don't think you jumped the gun... his "rage" and refusal to use the grammar rules in writing drove me batty. Writing is different than talking b/c the audience can't hear intonation, pauses or inflection in writing as they can in watching a video. People need to use the damn grammar rules when writing so the audience can understand what the person "speaking" is trying to say when the audience can't see or hear the speech. The concept and why of grammar isn't that complicated to grasp, so the rage at its necessity seems childish to me.
pretty much best of both worlds.
I guess what's interesting to me, and what I'm still having a hard time understanding, is that I don't perceive people like JP as changing channels at all. My uncle is similar to JP and a pastor, and everyone I know is like, "When will Unc get to the point?" and I'm thinking, "You have to be patient." JP and Unc do eventually bring the point home, they just go around more berry bushes first.
There have been occasions where I spoke with people who genuinely didn't seem to be able to hold the thread of a conversation in their heads. I really don't think JP is one of them.
Yeah this is an old comment but I agree. Jordan Peterson is straight up Ni, he is jumping around but everything he is talking about is in service to the starting conversation topic. My ENFP friend likes him but can't listen to him because the jumping around kills him. In my mind though, any Ni user should be able to follow him rather easily. Just my 2 cents though.
It’s a dependent, adverbial clause and must be separated from the independent clause with a comma.
That's funny! I remember I was eavesdropping, and I was listening to an American woman talk to a woman from Japan. The American woman was surprised that the other woman had never seen The Wizard of Oz, so she then goes into describing the movie. She spends 15 minutes describing the movie, and she doesn't even get to the part where Dorothy gets to Oz. My brain was baffled! Like she is like, it's about a girl, and she lives on a farm, and she has these family members, and goes into great detail about the family and the farm, and what the girl is like, and talks about the neighbor, and the gypsy caravan, etc. Literally spends 15 minutes talking about The Wizard of Oz, and she doesn't once mention the fact that the movie is about a young girl who ends up in the Land of Oz. The conversation ended because the bus came, but like I was thinking, this poor Japanese woman, now she thinks the Wizard of Oz is just about a boring movie about a girl who lives on a farm...It was total Chapter talking!
I don't think it is what chapter talking, it seems like just an over detailed explanation. Actually it might be Si but totally not Ni, Ni is about being less and more effective.
Possibly Si low blast?
I think one of Dave's favorite activities is 'moving' Shan's Fi. :P
Listening to the Godspeed You! Black Emperor song Blaise Bailey Finnigan III, there is a really great field recording of what I presume to be an Ni single observer rant. It's awesome.
All of GY!BE is heavy Ni, I'd say. Maybe post-rock in general
Ha, ha, ha - use a comma, you see!
Holy shit, I just realised this chapter thinking in myself recently, this video confirmed my suspicion that it is an Ni thing
You need a comma after worlds, I guess? 😂😂
You're not allowed to ask me something not in my Oi bag
Lmfao.
"I'll settle for a comma" XD
Ohh sh!!!t; workin' the shirts again!
3:34 LMAOOO yes oh my god
That ending was so me 😂😂
Because we do not have spell check for our speech.... yet.
Talk to text is that in a way. Regardless it's a nice foot in the door.
Interesting - you guys seem to have a very different cognitive processing - when Sonia Sotomayor spoke about the WHY and how it could be done BETTER, my eyes lit up - because that is EXACTLY what we should focus on! And yet you focused on something trivial about insignificant sensory items about circling text? Really? You totally missed the big picture point. The obvious take away is that all justices should think like her!
Nathan, you made my morning. I haven't laughed like that in a while.
I'm sure Dave and Shanon understood the big picture of what Sonia was getting at.
Though, I don't think you understood the big picture of what Dave and Shanon were getting at.
This the the usual case of N vs S looking past each other
S & N living in the same but very different world. How come S is so literal
dammit dave, use a comma.
Ok so when i try ad solve a question in math but also on other topics i have a hard time knowing what the question is asking me, i usually read a few lines then start answering without carefully reading or understanding exaclty whats being asked so then i fail my exam.
What's going on ? I know this means i have low consume and high blast but is ni/si involved? If so how?
Any help would be really appreciated really need some other opinions
RIGHT!. Why cant we write the way we talk???
As long as its understandable and gets the message across does it really mater?
Googler here, waiting on the phone line queue to solve all your Google docs complains :D
Was that lady an Si or Ni person? I'm guessing Si 🤔
Wow this is just too much me
Love this analogy. Maybe talking about them and telling stories of our chapters (focusing on whatever your gendered letter is) will help that energy start to come out healthily
HAHAHAHA yeah I was gonna say you might need a comma. It’s like saying a separate sentence, and then you’re saying “pretty much” . Can you tell I use Si? Lol
This video is pretty much the best of both worlds or even the best of pretty much both worlds. But the best of both worlds? Pretty much - not! :P
Doesn't "pretty much best of both worlds" sound better?
Underrated
I know this isn’t entirely related to this video, but I’ve been thinking about this for a few days.
In relation to socionics, if you’re a jumper isfj, would that in turn mean that Te would lend itself to being a stronger function than Fe/Fi, just not as immediately valued? Could you perhaps do a video addressing this topic?
Isfp, technically in socionics, of course.
Hmm I’m not quite understanding abusively in the context. Abusively like a lot? What’s considered ‘a lot’ in this case? Or was something else meant?
mate ,you look like the guy from Gilmore girls that was in loved with lorelai and had Rory...hahahahha
I know they did overly dramatize that bit about the note taking
I’m a chapter talker, my bf is a channel changer. I’ve noticed my bf *try* (emphasis here) to talk in chapters to me, he wants to make a specific point and he wants to back that point, but he somehow wanders completely off track and starts talking about something unrelated. Then he comes back to me asking what his original point was.
He will do this physically too; he’ll set out to do something and I’ll find him 10 minutes later pacing around in a random room, having forgotten what he was doing.
90% sure he’s lead masculine Ne
If it's any consolation Dave people who have good grammar have this annoying habit of making all of their characters in a novel/podcast drama sound the same in terms of dialogue and inflection. So score 1 for you!
What is Jordan Peterson's personality type?
His type is FF Ne/Ti CP/B(S)
4:32 - 4:40 🤣
I challenge many blasters sometimes , but i don't go hard on them , because i feel bad if I destroy their view about the world , they will have nothing but emptiness and no purpose especially Si users , they just can't let go what they learn 🤣 , that why i prefer to let them do what they do :D hard true works..👍
I just couldn't ever understand Jordon Peterson. I mean could he first tell whats the point and then show how his examples related to that point?🙄
Petersen does tend to ramble, but it is connected. He's all about mapping out very deep connections of ideas (wrote a book, Maps of Meaning). When you listen to him, or anyone for that matter, you have to let them ramble. This is why Joe Rogan is killing it. He lets people just talk. If you are so stuck on hearing someone talk about a certain topic and get impatient because they veer away, it's poor listening on your part.
What is your wifes favourite drug?
oh god i hate those types of ISTJs/ESTJs......
Yes yes yeeeeees
I just turn off that spelling and grammar underlining bullshit. I’ll type what I want. Don’t control me, Mr. Paperclip.
It's funny, just over the weekend I was talking to my sister about how my life has chapters. and I went through all of the chapters of the last 10 years of my life. There were approximately 6-8 chapters. My chapters typically change when I start a new school, a new job, a new romantic relationship, or the end of a romantic relationship.
Guys, I gotta admit, the more I watch OP. The more I realize; we're actually different orders of a 4-animal personality type; the 32 types are just different flavors consisting of 16 classic MBTI (Vanilla, but actually just milk) + 16 jumpers (Vanilla + Chocolate, but actually chocolate milk); vanilla doesn't really exist, it's just an illusion!
Poor grammar?
I love you guys, but the swearing multiple times in a minute is offputting, especially peppering in the eff word. It's just not professional and makes it hard for me to refer others to your work. I try to overlook it for the sake of the message, but it detracts from the actual content, which is itself so layered and intriguing.
I would love to see the two of you stop filling vocabulary in lazily with swear words and become more articulate in your speech. Not trying to be mean, but if your hope is to gain respect for Objective Personality, you're harming yourselves with the way you talk. Just save it for your personal conversations.
Don't be a hater now.
What you're asking is for them not to be themselves.
I thoroughly enjoy their occasional use of profanity. It makes them come off as more relatable.
The value judgement that swearing isn't professional is a statement of your opinion and that same judgement is what makes it hard for you to refer others to their work.
The cursing doesn't detract from the content at all, it's an intrinsic facet of the content. It may be off-putting to you, but that's not their problem.
What you call ". . .filling vocabulary in lazily with swear words. . ." I say it's just them being themselves.
I understand them completely and don't see a good reason why they would need to articulate more.
You are in control of how you react to something. I'm sure you have the capacity to look past the cursing and focus on what's important instead of something that's trivial.
It's not things that upset us, it's our judgment about things that upsets us.
Whats Jordan Peterson again?
Mr. 8-Bit Doggo
A consumer dominant that shares their known information for a living.
I guess since he isn't blast last he's more inclined
Ugh ESTJ make me vomit.