Bionic Zoom Review - vs Amazon Generic | As Seen on TV

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 дек 2024

Комментарии • 259

  • @cyberi4a
    @cyberi4a Год назад +2

    That goose at the very end was sure telling you off.....LOL

  • @JorgeGonzalez-yt8sy
    @JorgeGonzalez-yt8sy Год назад +38

    you can zoom in with your phone while attached to the monocular so you get double zoom. i do that with microscopes at work, comes in handy. your phone will autofocus to help cancel out blurriness.

    • @malagastehlaate230
      @malagastehlaate230 Год назад +2

      I take pictures with my phone using the microscope as well... it can be a tad tricky but it's possible to do... so yeah thinking if you zoomed your phone and then used the gadget... it would get a much closer image. I'm assuming.

    • @james0000
      @james0000 Год назад

      I always found using the phone with a (macro/micro/stereo)scope was difficult, so I bought an HD USB digital camera that slides into the eyepiece tube. Those slip on macro lenses for phones camera be very helpful in general though.

    • @dakotareid1566
      @dakotareid1566 Год назад +1

      @@james0000new iPhones have a built in macro camera it’s pretty insane

  • @tartsonawire
    @tartsonawire Год назад +3

    Nothing to do with the product, but something I was reminded of with all the ducks and geese...
    The cemetery where my Dad and grandparents are buried has a big, man made lake in the middle with lots of turtles, fish, ducks, geese, and a few swans. I was taking pics of them from my car one day and was starting to drive off, when a pair of geese started chasing the car. I stopped, they stopped. I moved, they moved. I took their picture and they went on about their business. They wouldn't let me leave without taking their picture too 😄

  • @valengreymoon5623
    @valengreymoon5623 Год назад +103

    A couple of these, and some zip ties,....instant binoculars.

    • @mokisan
      @mokisan Год назад +5

      Lol

    • @ThemeParkBeast98
      @ThemeParkBeast98 Год назад +4

      😂😂💀

    • @falxonPSN
      @falxonPSN Год назад +14

      With a free bonus of pain and suffering. The image from these cheap devices with plastic lenses is going to induce a headache within seconds probably.

    • @Camelotsmoon
      @Camelotsmoon Год назад +3

      I just imagine making some sort of budget binocular headset that looks ridiculous lol.

    • @ilovemalechickens
      @ilovemalechickens Год назад +8

      Frickin macgyver over here

  • @timacrow
    @timacrow Год назад +7

    I have either the same or very similar monocular from Amazon. For the price, it is a pretty good scope for nature walks and camping.

  • @DJKC
    @DJKC Год назад +24

    Used to work in a photography store. We'd call these spotter scopes, altho I don't think there was anything that small. You'd be looking at around £130 to anything like £300+ and that was early 00's. They were a bit larger tho and certainly higher end.

  • @niclastname
    @niclastname Год назад +16

    I'm curious how it would look to use one of these AND zoom on the phone a little. I'd guess it would make a noticeable difference.

    • @TheMushyPotato
      @TheMushyPotato Год назад +2

      I was curious about the same thing

    • @BadvisionStudios
      @BadvisionStudios Год назад

      With these things, the camera simply sees what your eyes see. Zooming the phone camera in would just simply magnify a crappy image. These are single, plastic lenses (hence so much blur and colour aberration toward the edges) and are basically toy-quality.
      As someone here mentioned, if someone actually want decent quality magnification, they have to spend some serious money for multi-glass lenses.

  • @bahamutbbob
    @bahamutbbob Год назад +7

    The phone mount seems kinda iffy, but I'd take optical zoom over digital zoom any day.

  • @Donteatacowman
    @Donteatacowman Год назад +1

    Thank you for the incredible bird clips at the end :)

  • @bingolizinifunnyname7448
    @bingolizinifunnyname7448 Год назад +18

    I have been using a similar monocular with my phone for pictures for the last year. It definitely looks better if you zoom in on your phone with the monocular attached. It's a great alternative to an expensive camera, just a little finicky. Though I would definitely get one with 10x zoom. Seems like the best middle ground since too much zoom reduces light.

  • @MichaelEMJAYARE
    @MichaelEMJAYARE Год назад +7

    What a beautiful place, its like youre guaranteed to see a bird every few feet.

  • @-Sirens-
    @-Sirens- Год назад +2

    Im assuming the amazon one saying 80x must be a typo. What im guessing is someone was told it was 8.0x and they didnt add the period.

  • @justachick9793
    @justachick9793 Год назад +11

    Those definitely looked like something else on first scroll-through, I thought I was on a VERY different site for a second. 😅

  • @MustangSally7259
    @MustangSally7259 Год назад +6

    I have a pair of Zeiss binos.... they are awesome!

    • @sirbum1918
      @sirbum1918 Год назад +1

      When you tried the good stuff, cheap crap like those 2 are just a waste of money.

  • @zymurgea
    @zymurgea Год назад +7

    I tend to use the magnifier along with the phone's zoom to get close ups. I use a monoscope from Sharper Imagine which I purchased over 10 years ago for both viewing and taking pictures.

  • @theBabyDead
    @theBabyDead Год назад +5

    If you want to take pictures, use a real camera with a zoom lens.
    If you want to use your own eyes, use a scope.
    And no, the phone zoomed pictures were quite clearly worse quality, lol. Almost all of the finer details got lost. But I do agree it'd be pretty stupid to take a picture through a scope, especially without some form of support. That's what real cameras are for, though.

  • @estoylaroca
    @estoylaroca Год назад +2

    I think the phone comparison is only useful in terms of the power of magnification.
    I mean, there is still a difference between seeing it with your eyes, vs seeing it through a picture / video on your phone.
    But honestly, I'd still bring a 2 lens telescope if I really want to look at something.

  • @shelleylemmond46
    @shelleylemmond46 Год назад +2

    I like the Amazon zoom but your phone was actually pretty clear. I'd go with the phone. Thank you James 😊

  • @shane250
    @shane250 Год назад +1

    Try zooming with the phone AND add that scope!

  • @bruns-o-tron
    @bruns-o-tron Год назад +10

    Thank you very much for the review. It’s nice to know sometimes going right out and buying a gadget is not the best idea, because we may already carry a gadget that does what we need. Also, I’m very happy you’re a fellow Bugler! #hellobuglers

  • @samhklm
    @samhklm Год назад +1

    I think the amazing thing here is that there is wildlife any where near Las Vegas.

  • @frankiecal3186
    @frankiecal3186 Год назад +2

    🙏 please review the flipper zero and NReal air gasses I'm dying to see what you think of both of these products. Love your reviews.

  • @moledrools
    @moledrools Год назад +1

    This is by far my favorite channel

  • @reluctantuser6971
    @reluctantuser6971 Год назад +2

    If the Bionic Zoom claims to be a "zoom", it should zoom. If the telescope has a fixed focal length, that means it doesn't zoom. In order to zoom, it'd have to be able to go from one focal length through to another.

  • @AliP1970
    @AliP1970 Год назад +2

    Beautiful views! The birds are "twitterpated" this time of year in the Midwest, I would assume the same would be true out there as well. That's probably what they were talking about 😉

  • @schmitty8225
    @schmitty8225 Год назад +5

    I'd say both lenses did better than the iPhone. There was a ton of pixelization and artifacts on the iPhone pictures.

    • @falxonPSN
      @falxonPSN Год назад

      Not to mention, it was not a like for like comparison. If you're going to zoom in a certain amount on the phone then you need to zoom in that amount on the phone and use it with the external lens. But the whole point of using an external lens is so you don't have to do the terrible quality pinch zooming

    • @Ren-lx8wv
      @Ren-lx8wv Год назад

      @@falxonPSN the issue is the i phone doesn't actually zoom the lens it just stretches out the picture making it more pixelated the more you go in.

    • @falxonPSN
      @falxonPSN Год назад +1

      @Ren that was my point. But by comparing light to like you would get a sense of how much further you could get some level of detail. At the end of the day even a crappy optical zoom like this is going to beat any phone's fake Zoom.

  • @deathxsharpee2260
    @deathxsharpee2260 Год назад +1

    I had some interest in finding something like this. Thanks for the video

  • @dunringill1747
    @dunringill1747 Год назад +2

    Normally, if a monocular advertises 8 x 50 they mean 8x magnification and a 50 mm objective lens aperture.
    Too often, monoculars are bending the rules when advertising their product. Correct me if I'm wrong on this: When the generic claims 80 x 100, they are making the assumption a 10x digital zoom phone is attached to their 8x monocular. The 100 most likely refers to the focal length of 100mm.

  • @thoforn
    @thoforn Год назад

    "All the Ducks are swimming in the water"-Lemon Jelly...

  • @boss862
    @boss862 Год назад +1

    I feel like with every video you keep looking younger. I really like the full beard look. Great video as always! Can't wait to watch the next one!

  • @keco185
    @keco185 Год назад +1

    Right next to an airport seems like the worst spot to have a bird preserve

    • @johnbennett1465
      @johnbennett1465 Год назад

      The land is probably cheap there because no one wants to live near an airport.

  • @Wrecker3D
    @Wrecker3D Год назад +1

    I don't know i you would (be able to) test this, but I've had a few commercials pushed on me (games on phone) about a smartwatch that allegedly could measure blood sugar levels... I don't think it works, and since the commercial suggests you can throw away the conventional test strips etc. this might be a great way to tell people NOT to buy/believe the commercial for health reasons if it indeed does not as advertised -don't remember the specific name of the product though, but I'm seeing multiple watches claiming the glucose functionality in amazon

  • @FingerTightRacing8
    @FingerTightRacing8 Год назад +6

    Those transitions were PHENOMENAL 🤩

  • @tommywvcacher
    @tommywvcacher Год назад +1

    The phone quality is just as good without a separate device like these.

  • @nicklopez4362
    @nicklopez4362 Год назад +1

    Is that Clark County wetlands park or somewhere else?

  • @pinkysistamb
    @pinkysistamb Год назад

    Thanks for saving me some dollars. Bionic Zoom is at Ollie's for $7.99, so I figured I watch your review first.

  • @MrRickwe76
    @MrRickwe76 Год назад

    It's not the gadgets this time, it's the fact you got that close to a Canadian goose and it didn't run or attack you! Indiana native here, geese are mean in my parts.

  • @ethelryan257
    @ethelryan257 Год назад

    What a great video. James was also the prettiest thing filmed.

  • @steveweinberg462
    @steveweinberg462 Год назад +1

    I'm not surprised that Bionic View omits coated lenses, but they don't even give lens caps?

  • @Michael-si2ln
    @Michael-si2ln Год назад +1

    Thank you James for your awesome review❤

  • @MrStanUp
    @MrStanUp Год назад

    Thanks for the review, I enjoy your content. I was just browsing Amazon for that Monocular and notice they also offer a few that are digital for just a few dollars more at $59. I wonder if these are better than a phone, they are also night vision... hmmm. Please consider reviewing a couple of these.

  • @jacquelineperry8749
    @jacquelineperry8749 Год назад

    Your review was very helpful going to purchase the bionic zoom, it's less than 8 bucks at my local Lowe's

  • @KenjiShinomori
    @KenjiShinomori Год назад +9

    I thought.. those were uhm.. Fle- 'Flashlights'

    • @josephbennett3482
      @josephbennett3482 Год назад

      You need to get your head out of the gutter , James doesn't review sex toys.

  • @Nightmaredeathdealer
    @Nightmaredeathdealer Год назад

    My wife met you at Static X. Sorry I missed you. Didn’t wanna lose our spot. Hope you had fun!

  • @joshuasharrock466
    @joshuasharrock466 Год назад +4

    I"'m here for the dad jokes...
    Guess I'll stay for the review

    • @7-ten
      @7-ten Год назад +1

      I went to the discount dentist.
      I left with two buck teeth.

  • @Daehawk
    @Daehawk Год назад +1

    I just like the old old phone.

  • @8hammer2189
    @8hammer2189 Год назад

    Came here for the thumbnail! Was disappointed to find out this was a review for binoculars. I’m so lonely 😂

  • @lairdcummings9092
    @lairdcummings9092 Год назад

    We sell those in my store - we've been laughing about the "8x" magnification. We're wondering if it can help find competent management.

  • @johnnybgood6424
    @johnnybgood6424 Год назад

    Haha this is the first time I've seen you review a product I've reviewed on Amazon.

  • @garageink74
    @garageink74 Год назад

    Let’s get a counter top ice maker shootout for summer.

  • @ryancoke777
    @ryancoke777 Год назад

    Careful around those cobra chickens! (Canadian geese lol)

  • @IMDARKFIRE007
    @IMDARKFIRE007 Год назад +1

    There aren't many ducks near me anymore...know why? Meat is expensive now.

  • @86holt
    @86holt Год назад +25

    Fairly certain that scope CANT do up to 50 miles

    • @3v1Bunny
      @3v1Bunny Год назад +1

      with a laser pointer on a mountain shining back at you :D

    • @Ea-Nasir_Copper_Co
      @Ea-Nasir_Copper_Co Год назад +23

      sure it can! Point it at the moon, you got a quarter million miles!

    • @monhi64
      @monhi64 Год назад +2

      That doesn’t even make any sense because anything that’s possible to be visible 50 miles away has to be damn near a mountain in the first place. Just based on horizons

    • @UloPe
      @UloPe Год назад +7

      Sure it can, you can see 50 miles with your bare eyes if you’re up high enough…

    • @joeromack6188
      @joeromack6188 Год назад

      @@UloPe on pot, or something else?

  • @AzureWolfblood
    @AzureWolfblood Год назад +2

    Bionic Zoom one kind of looks like its from the dollar store, so does its packaging.

  • @georgiasainsbury6311
    @georgiasainsbury6311 Год назад +4

    New video couldn't come at a better time been crying for a hour because of my depression getting bad , these videos are a fantastic distraction ❤❤

    • @7-ten
      @7-ten Год назад +6

      Plant a garden to help keep your mind busy. ❤

    • @AB-C1
      @AB-C1 Год назад +4

      You're not alone, stay strong you got this!
      Guided meditations help ALOT, there's loads free on RUclips for depression anxiety etc. Sleep ones aswell that help you go to sleep at night. Hope this helps 👍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧

    • @freethebirds3578
      @freethebirds3578 Год назад +1

      praying for you

    • @Rizky06
      @Rizky06 Год назад +1

      Hang in there Georgia better days are coming soon.

  • @leese.23
    @leese.23 Год назад

    I've never gotten the idea monoculars probably because both my eyes are so different I need the binoculars. I think that your old iPhone was definitely the clearest picture.

  • @punkypink83
    @punkypink83 Год назад

    those canada geese are so ubiquitous! i work on the water here in UK, which is about as far from vegas as u can get and we ALSO have tons of them here 😂

  • @a4bcaboose
    @a4bcaboose Год назад +2

    I wonder what would happen if you zoomed in on your phone while looking through

  • @japanesecinema6736
    @japanesecinema6736 Год назад +1

    Loving the beard my dude!

  • @3rdpig
    @3rdpig Год назад +4

    They're junk, don't waste your money. You can't buy good glass for $40. These might be OK for a kid's toy, but for any serious use you'll need to spend quite a bit more. For professional use you'll need to spend a LOT more. All the inexpensive Chinese optics I've ever seen have been blurry at the edges, sharp on one side but blurry on the other, filled with dust and often can't be focused sharply at all.

  • @traci4750
    @traci4750 Год назад

    lol nice close ups of the towers on black mtn.

  • @bradasstv
    @bradasstv Год назад +2

    Feel like the Bionic company wanted to go into the spy store route but wouldn't commit to brick and mortar stores, so now they just sell their wares on tv lol

  • @Oceangirl_505
    @Oceangirl_505 Год назад +4

    Interesting, James. If it was me, I'd just stick with the phone, even though I am somewhat of a bird watcher (minus the jets overhead). The way I look at it, when you get your next phone, it will be even better. Thanks for all that you do for us.

  • @mindofmadness5593
    @mindofmadness5593 Год назад

    As a photographer my advice is to either spend a bit more for quality glass or really, really lower your expectations.

  • @andyvitz
    @andyvitz Год назад

    Make sure you don't adjust the part for glasses on the $30 one the gray one because that will make it blurry

  • @ARPLATINUM
    @ARPLATINUM Год назад

    I'll stick with my space zoom lol

  • @MuffinStuffer_TV
    @MuffinStuffer_TV Год назад +1

    Henderson Nevada huh? I've been there before 😊

  • @thelion43
    @thelion43 Год назад

    Oh bird watching I thought you meant Bird watching 😉 😂

  • @NatureOkie
    @NatureOkie Год назад

    I bought a super zoom, from a Facebook ad.
    It showed, a zoom capability.
    What arrived had a focus like that, was otherwise crummy and cheap.
    After having used Zeiss or Canon optics, during my Navy Photog career, the product was vastly over represented.

  • @jeffreybarton1297
    @jeffreybarton1297 Год назад

    I'd ignore these and go for a Celestron G2, 10 times magnification, a lot smaller, and lighter to carry, and cheaper (£24). The image quality is also higher.

  • @ThatSoddingGamer
    @ThatSoddingGamer Год назад

    I don't speak Canadian Goose, but I'm pretty sure the one at the end was just saying "Fuck off!" on repeat, which tracks with how ornery they are.

  • @WolfBeard3093
    @WolfBeard3093 Год назад +1

    As a fellow bald bearded guy, I like the new look man. Nice beard 😎

  • @MediocreChief
    @MediocreChief Год назад +1

    loving the beard man

  • @dperreno
    @dperreno Год назад

    Image quality of the Amazon one was clearly much better than the Bionic, but neither of them was even close to as good as my cheap pair of japanese binoculars that I got when I was a kid in the '70s.

  • @jrworthy
    @jrworthy Год назад +1

    Never been this early to a Freakin’ Review.

  • @lllSTRIK3Rlll
    @lllSTRIK3Rlll Год назад

    Did you record the bees from a tv screen?

  • @monhi64
    @monhi64 Год назад +1

    Huh idk the bionic zoom actually looks better to me. Definitely has worse peripherals but seems like idk 30-50% more zoom better color. Could just be how it was caught on camera tho

  • @area4997
    @area4997 Год назад

    Cheap optics. Fringing blue and/or yellow. Hard to focus. The old phone's images were way better. It pays to spend a little more to get something you will actually enjoy using.😎

  • @fvidal007
    @fvidal007 Год назад

    What sunglasses are you wearing?

  • @LuckyStone888
    @LuckyStone888 Год назад

    I bought some binoculars that came with an accessory to attach to your phone and it was terrible to get to work. Just using the phone to see was much easier.

  • @ShirlBussman
    @ShirlBussman Год назад +8

    Thanks, James for bringing something I didn't know exists, and saving me $$$'s.
    I guess I should go to Amazon and just screw around their site. 🤣Love your reviews. 🤗🥰

  • @fyrhtu81
    @fyrhtu81 Год назад +2

    ... "HD." 😂 They missed a great BS marketing claim here - I mean, if you're going to misuse terms, may as well go for the gold and call it "over 8k" (I mean, as long as the optics aren't utter trash, it'd be, technically, an accurate claim. Actually, more accurate than calling it "HD.")

  • @ThaumaturgistGuard
    @ThaumaturgistGuard Год назад

    The problem with such scopes is that they use very basic lenses which create light aberrations, which, in turn, produce dim and unfocused image. Okay for very simple use, not okay if you want something more sharp

  • @Q80vaper
    @Q80vaper Год назад

    Thanks for another awesome video James

  • @Runedragonx
    @Runedragonx Год назад

    Walk past anger incarnate
    "HONK!"

  • @syedsiraj1791
    @syedsiraj1791 Год назад

    Any electronic gadgets comparison videos plz

  • @hirotakasugi4891
    @hirotakasugi4891 Год назад +2

    At first I thought those were fleshlights.
    Fleshlight reviews when?

  • @caittails
    @caittails Год назад

    True crime people’s minds all went to the same place with “and more” 😂

  • @9liveslisa
    @9liveslisa Год назад +1

    Save your money and put it in a piggy bank for a newer iPhone! Seriously, thanks for the review. I'll pass on the monoculars.

  • @j.k.7807
    @j.k.7807 Год назад

    Not sure why anyone would want either. 8x and 10x are the most common of binoculars and can easily be found starting on the cheap. I'd rather get the cheap binoculars then either of these.

  • @sendachimptospace
    @sendachimptospace Год назад

    Dang content has been flowing. 😊

  • @dustinhuiting
    @dustinhuiting Год назад

    Can you do affordable projectors

  • @timsouttahere
    @timsouttahere Год назад

    I thought it was a fleshlight at first. You should review those 😅 j/k... kinda

  • @FilmFlam-8008
    @FilmFlam-8008 Год назад +3

    Wow. These did not look like binoculars in the video thumbnail.

    • @jaseaustin991
      @jaseaustin991 Год назад +2

      Yuuuuup came here to say the same lol

  • @alschissler4299
    @alschissler4299 Год назад

    not for anyone concerning serious work consider a lens attachment to your camera or phone giving very goodresults on the cheap for serious video/photos good lens do not come cheap especially if your seeking professional work.

  • @francisphillips53
    @francisphillips53 Год назад

    Nice job going all out for this review! The iPhone camera is much better, and clearer. 😊😊😊

  • @sreynolds777
    @sreynolds777 Год назад

    Why not use the zoom on the phone and then add the monocular to it?

  • @andrewzach1921
    @andrewzach1921 Год назад

    Thanks for the video and the review.

  • @desklaser
    @desklaser Год назад

    I would also think comparing to these to a modern $1000+ smartphone would be a bit of an unfair comparison anyways.

  • @beccac6451
    @beccac6451 Год назад

    You didn't mention what you paid for the amazon one?