Me: I’m buying a coffee machine, but sometimes it pours coffee, sometimes mercury, and other times dried parsley into my cup. I’m complaining that it doesn’t work properly. People in the comments: Well, sure, it’s not great right now, but just wait a few years-there’ll be a new coffee machine that’ll actually work like it should.
Great job on the video. The only generator that I've seen do a good job on text is Leonardo AI, but it's an image generator. It works good to generate the first and last frames in an image generator then use either Kling, morph studio or Luma to make the video.
Thanks! It’s great to get a compliment from a fellow professional! I use ScreenFlow for screen recording, and all the effects are added later in DaVinci Resolve.
In other news, carriage maker in 1899 defames those nasty "automobiles" for spewing smoke and being prone to breaking down. Technology is always changing and getting better. Last year we had Will Smith eating spaghetti as nightmare fuel, today, video generators can do a credible job, if not perfect, of depicting somebody eating... but you go on with the clickbaity videos and ridiculous premises to encourage "engagement" like my own post here. I won't be subscribing or liking though.
The purpose of this video to show what kind of videos you’ll actually get as an everyday user. Not as an AI pro who understands all the fine-tuning or has unlimited tokens to generate 100 variations of the same prompt. Maybe my title is a bit clickbaity, but it’s just as honest as the claims AI video companies make about how “amazing” their videos are. Don’t you think the polished videos they use on their landing pages or the ones that blow up on Twitter are just carefully cherry-picked? And people buy into these promises, expecting to see the same results. But instead, they get disappointing videos and think it’s their fault, like they just don’t know how to use the tool or write the right prompts. But it’s not on them. It’s just that the tech isn’t there yet. It’s not good or bad - it’s just where things are right now.
The quality of the videos are mostly like crap. The y can’t even understand stand prompts well and when you give them pictures most of the time they fail. They are hyped, they cost a lot of money to do very little.
@@victoria.endless The videos with Kling are not 100%, but they are amazing. Were you using AI a year ago or even 2 years ago? Have you tried any of the open source software? The tools that you have provided are good, when used properly and prompted properly. Kling is actually amazing.
I agree I tried a couple of different Al videos sights. Horrible results. As far the “you don’t know how to prompt commenter.” I tried copying one of the prompts that supposedly created one of the great samples. Crap results. I’m sure it’ll get there. I’ll be long gone by then but it’ll get there.
Victoria, the title you decided to use is also a scam. Take away all the hypes and clickbaits please, because actually your video is good by itself. And the "cheers everyone for using this video for training" with 6 fingers was really cool. Really, tone it down, you will get anyway the viewers you deserve. Love from Italy❣
Thank you so much for your support, it really means a lot to me 🫶🏽 Once my channel grows a bit more, I’ll be able to set my own rules with RUclips, but for now, I have to play by its rules. Catchy titles work, and I can see that in the numbers. Plus, I really do think the hype around AI video is overblown, and their ads are misleading people.
There are a lot of people seeking validation about hating AI (how it's simultaneously useless and bad and also stealing everybody's jobs), so they're likely to click on this title.
@@allinafter50she’s putting insane amount of effort into every video and you wanna hinder her growth because of a title? She hasn’t sold out or anything, it’s a title like anything else. The topic is the reliance on currently underperforming ai software, the title isn’t far off and still, it doesn’t matter if you can watch it and learn from it
Me: I’m buying a coffee machine, but sometimes it pours coffee, sometimes mercury, and other times dried parsley into my cup. I’m complaining that it doesn’t work properly.
People in the comments: Well, sure, it’s not great right now, but just wait a few years-there’ll be a new coffee machine that’ll actually work like it should.
I am curious how well the new AIs perform in these same scenarios. Like flux and sora.
Inviting AI to train on your video after adding a sixth finger to your hand: Perfect. Nice touch. Subtle yet hilarious.
Great job on the video. The only generator that I've seen do a good job on text is Leonardo AI, but it's an image generator. It works good to generate the first and last frames in an image generator then use either Kling, morph studio or Luma to make the video.
are you AI Victoria? What is the best Ai software to use for making music videos. Where I can type and see exactly what I typed.
Great video Victoria! Can I ask you what do you use for screen recording?
Thanks! It’s great to get a compliment from a fellow professional! I use ScreenFlow for screen recording, and all the effects are added later in DaVinci Resolve.
@@victoria.endless Thanks a lot, keep going!
In other news, carriage maker in 1899 defames those nasty "automobiles" for spewing smoke and being prone to breaking down. Technology is always changing and getting better. Last year we had Will Smith eating spaghetti as nightmare fuel, today, video generators can do a credible job, if not perfect, of depicting somebody eating... but you go on with the clickbaity videos and ridiculous premises to encourage "engagement" like my own post here. I won't be subscribing or liking though.
The purpose of this video to show what kind of videos you’ll actually get as an everyday user. Not as an AI pro who understands all the fine-tuning or has unlimited tokens to generate 100 variations of the same prompt.
Maybe my title is a bit clickbaity, but it’s just as honest as the claims AI video companies make about how “amazing” their videos are. Don’t you think the polished videos they use on their landing pages or the ones that blow up on Twitter are just carefully cherry-picked?
And people buy into these promises, expecting to see the same results. But instead, they get disappointing videos and think it’s their fault, like they just don’t know how to use the tool or write the right prompts. But it’s not on them. It’s just that the tech isn’t there yet. It’s not good or bad - it’s just where things are right now.
The quality of the videos are mostly like crap. The y can’t even understand stand prompts well and when you give them pictures most of the time they fail. They are hyped, they cost a lot of money to do very little.
@@gloriakalengelayi8294 It's not that they don't understand the prompts. It is that you don't know how to prompt.
@@victoria.endless The videos with Kling are not 100%, but they are amazing. Were you using AI a year ago or even 2 years ago? Have you tried any of the open source software? The tools that you have provided are good, when used properly and prompted properly. Kling is actually amazing.
I agree I tried a couple of different Al videos sights. Horrible results. As far the “you don’t know how to prompt commenter.” I tried copying one of the prompts that supposedly created one of the great samples. Crap results. I’m sure it’ll get there. I’ll be long gone by then but it’ll get there.
you've got an interesting accent, is it portuguese?
Your channel would be bigger without the cynical titles. 😂
which AI company are you working for?
@@VooDooEf this is the 2nd comment that sounds like they are working for an AI video generator company. The 1st one was even worse.
Victoria, the title you decided to use is also a scam. Take away all the hypes and clickbaits please, because actually your video is good by itself. And the "cheers everyone for using this video for training" with 6 fingers was really cool. Really, tone it down, you will get anyway the viewers you deserve. Love from Italy❣
Thank you so much for your support, it really means a lot to me 🫶🏽
Once my channel grows a bit more, I’ll be able to set my own rules with RUclips, but for now, I have to play by its rules. Catchy titles work, and I can see that in the numbers.
Plus, I really do think the hype around AI video is overblown, and their ads are misleading people.
@@victoria.endless You justified a BS clickbait title. Nice. I have asked youtube to forget your channel.
There are a lot of people seeking validation about hating AI (how it's simultaneously useless and bad and also stealing everybody's jobs), so they're likely to click on this title.
@@allinafter50she’s putting insane amount of effort into every video and you wanna hinder her growth because of a title? She hasn’t sold out or anything, it’s a title like anything else. The topic is the reliance on currently underperforming ai software, the title isn’t far off and still, it doesn’t matter if you can watch it and learn from it
They represent these services as capable of doing things they're not. Title seems accurate to me.
AI is TRASH.