One of the greatest! Brilliant mind, fantastic sense of humour and a genius in keeping the audience quasi fixated on the speaker. extremely interesting topic! Thank you for this lecture, Professor Phillips!
This was a lovely romp through some very detailed material which was just SO expertly brought to life by the enthusiasm and charm of the good doctor. Olympic-grade curiosity and a youthful sense of wonder are hard to beat, Bravo!
I'm not sure but I do know time seems to be accelerating today and it's not because I'm older either. I hear the younger generation describe the same kind of feeling which is strange. Did anyone ever feel like the day dragged on and on or the complete opposite where you felt like the day was over in what felt like an hour. We all know that can't be possible because time can't be controlled. Or can it?
It can be ,and aside of that people are playing with time ,the earth has areas that also is unstable or has portals open up at certain points and times like during odd storms and alignments of planets and so forth,and so.e of us are effected or thrown into these effects and so on and so on and ironically others from those dimensions and times are thrown here with us, there's alot of "Secrets" they don't want the common human to know that a handful do know and it could cost as it has a few lives for this knowledge.
Even my kids are noticing time is flying by. Seems to me when i look back over my 55 years that time was 'elongated' or seemed to last longer. Sorry, can't explain it any better; but, now...it's racing. Be xmas soon at this rate!
@@dominicseanmccann6300 yeah my kids too..I know my younger years felt soooo long and feels like forever ago yet it doesn't...its soo strange!! The past 20 yrs felt so ridiculously fast!!
Fascinating how so much attention to detail is required to be exact or close as possible to exact. Mind blowing how intelligent people are. I can watch this stuff all day.
It's insane. Physics is, imo, even harder than pure mathematics because in physics your theories are supposed to be proven by experimentation. Thats HARD.
Anyone can do what's easy. It's the ones who choose to do what's hard that make the important discoveries and change the way everyone thinks and lives. A person can change the world by choosing to do what's hard.
I'm glad you got your GPS facts right. Like needing 3 satellites for telemetry and a 4th for time synchronization. Here's something you might not know about GPS that I learned from the original source of the technology. All GPS time data is partial encrypted all the time and capable of being fully encrypted at a moments notice. The ability to fully encrypt the data stream is probably apparent to everyone knowing that it is a military technology since the ability to use it is a privilege granted by the government and would be encrypted immediately if the need to do so is determined by the Joint Chiefs or President which would make everything other than military GPS equipment completely and utterly useless. The partial encryption I mentioned is that the nanoseconds (arbitrarily speaking because I don't remember the exact cutoff where encryption begins and wouldn't be able to say even if I did remember) are encrypted by the military [the Navy being the original developer of the technology in the late 60's and early 70's and maintainer of the 32 satellite constellation although the role may have shifted to another entity by now] so that the very fine precision data needed to determine the telemetric distances to within an inch is lost. So to compensate for this civilian equipment must use the data from all satellites that are available at any given time (since the GPS constellation is not geosynchronous and satellites are constantly coming into and out of your line of sight) and use complex algorithms in order to get a similar location precision that the military gets using only 4 satellites with encrypted equipment. I say similar but it's really not because the military gear can tell your location exactly to within less than an inch while civilian equipment can really only intuitively guess your precise location which can be illustrated by bringing your location up on Google Maps and see exactly how precise it is while somewhere with little to no landmarks such as roads etc for it to reference and watch your location bounce around while you stand still and likely never be steadily within a foot of your true location. It's good enough to fullfil it's purpose as a location aid and no where near enough to use for targeting. So yeah. What people don't know about the things they use every day is astronomically astounding but then again is ignorance bliss? I mean ignorance is bliss...?
Surveyors have better GPS interpretation built into their equipment than a smart phone's GPS capability . A surveyor can determine their location within millimeters and do so by using the signal from a minimum of 7 GPS sattelites. No other satelites, other than the dedicated GPS ones, are included (or whatever you meant).
If we take into consideration that we use this also for smart ai driving automobiles than the difference of a few centimeters can do a difference between life and deaths, and this is why i see this as unacceptable to be restricted from public use. Yes, it can be used for malicious things, but so alot of other things that gets regalement.
That went into far deeper and more interesting territory than I expected it would. Love the first hand experience at the intersection of many evolving technologies.
I fell asleep watching something else, I woke up to this. I was about to turn it off because I don't typically watch TV in my sleep not to mention I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. But as I looked for the remote I heard enthusiasm so I watched. While I don't understand the topic what I do understand is human behavior, statistics, profiling, everything that has anything to do with why people act or feel a certain way. What I just saw was one of the most beautiful things about humanity, passion! I could listen to both of you talk all day and not have a clue what you're talking about because you both have so much passion in the topic that I find it refreshing. Everyday people complain and I ask them "what makes you smile no matter what, what drives you, makes you talk" they don't remember. Never ever lose that passion, it's such a beautiful gift.
Thank you Sir.. For the knowledge delivered. Appreciate the TIME you have ALSO devoted to becoming ""fluent" in language that is comprehensible to the widest range of listeners possible! The mark of a true EDUCATOR as opposed to a TEACHER! MUCH RESPECT! THANK YOU!
This is one of the very best scientific explanations I've ever seen. I envy the students who get to hear this professor on a regular basis. He explains a lot about how science works.
teachers can / could / sometimes do / be cool & guide us through heady ,hairy environments of theory , rules & baselines which are often intellectually challenging to the layperson . I understand what you mean about envying the student of this teacher on any regular course's duration.💡🧠🤓
Time changes depending on who is looking at it. The entire universe, that we peer into from multiple vantages can slam shut in a moment. Orders of magnitude are beyond our capacity to "grasp." (Imagine being sent to hell for one day, but to your sense, it seems like 10,000 years.)
@@louiseevans5752 I dont know what people are thinking, comments make me realize a ton of people are walking around not in their right minds but can operate computers and type, prolly drive too. Scary.
Fantastic lecture by the great William Phillips - a man who has accomplished so many pioneering things in his wonderful career. I will be sending this video to my nieces and nephews who have developed a passion for science. Thanks for making this. I have some things to say about the lecture. Fun Fact: It was Albert Einstein who first predicted the Boson, which is critical to the creation of atomic clocks. It was Einstein's work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates which gave us the theory upon which ultracold atoms are created. Einstein's work on spontaneous and stimulated emission ALONE has garnered several Nobel Prizes. Einstein is usually revered as the father of special and general relativity (which he is). However, founding director of the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research professor Manuel Cardona showed in his 2005 ArXiv article on the history of physics that Einstein is actually the father of Solid State Physics as well as the broader version of the field known as Condensed Matter Physics (which includes liquids). Einstein's 1907 article on the specific heat of solids introduced, for the first time, the effect of lattice vibrations on the thermodynamic properties of crystals, in particular the specific heat. His 1905 article on the photoelectric effect and photoluminescence opened the fields of photoelectron spectroscopy and photoluminescence spectroscopy. Other important achievements - he did so many, it's impossible to list them all here - include the aforementioned Bose-Einstein condensation and the Einstein relation between the diffusion coefficient an mobility. The Einstein-De Haas Effect (one of his few endeavors into experimental, rather than theoretical, physics) was brilliant and ahead of its time. His work on quantum choas, in which he shows how (and why) the old Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rules are inadequate, was 60 years ahead of its time and only recently have physicists properly understood the implications of that paper. If you would like to read the paper in it's entirety to get a glimpse of Einstein's unparalleled physics genius, Google "Einstein's Unknown Insight and the Problem of Quantizing Choas" by A. Douglas Stone of Yale University. The guy was a super genius and saw things even other geniuses of his era failed to see (a great example being his seminal work on quantum entanglement as formalized in what are now known as EPR Correlations). Einstein's work on entanglement essentially created the field of quantum information science. And I haven't even gotten to his work on the foundations of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, his work on phonons, his work on wave-particle duality (13 years before De Broglie), his work on wormholes, etc. Einstein's work on Bose-Einstein statistics (and his novel approach to deriving Planck's distribution) directly lead Schrodinger to the discovery of the famous wave-function equation all undergrad physics student still study today when they learn quantum mechanics. Oh and just for giggles, he also solved the centuries-long problem known as the Tea Leaf paradox in his free time. Because, well, when you're a super genius that's just what you do. I doubt we will see another Einstein for quite some time. What an inspiration!
Yes. He was created by the largely zionist media by plagiarizing theories of Hendrik Lorentz, Henri Poincare, George Maxwell and Max Planck to create a poster child for zionism and the “superior” jewish intellect. Think about it: How can a second level patent clerk with NO education, NO laboratories, NO partnerships, NO credentials, NO funding…can come up with all these groundbreaking theories AFTER they were developed by those I mentioned above? Believe what you want, but the more you question…the more you realize the illusion of truth.
@@yyaa2539 Yes. He was created by the largely zionist media by plagiarizing theories of Hendrik Lorentz, Henri Poincare, George Maxwell and Max Planck to create a poster child for zionism and the “superior” jewish intellect. Think about it: How can a second level patent clerk with NO education, NO laboratories, NO partnerships, NO credentials, NO funding…can come up with all these groundbreaking theories AFTER they were developed by those I mentioned above? Believe what you want, but the more you question…the more you realize the illusion of truth.
@@yyaa2539 Public schools were infiltrated so the overwhelming majority of Humanity believe the Lies taught. It takes some serious digging to get to the real Truth, just remember that History is always written by the Victors, so follow the money.
We perceive time as a portion of our entire experience . As its fraction diminishes so does its relative duration. Time itself is just a construct of man to keep track of the cycles; and they remain , like the clockworks invented to mimic them , regular and constant without variation.
a question. looking at that ruff brake down of the atomic clock at 22:10, is what direction is the cesium traveling? what difference does that make? you may ask, in the Hafele & Keating experiment one clock went east with a -60 nano-secunda timing error, and a west clock had a +275 nano-secunda error, traveling about 400 mph. so, the clock should show a variation depending on direction the atoms are going, the Earth is rotating on its axis of about 700 mph, over 1,000 at the equator. if you point north or south (noon/midnight) you should consider the orbital speed of the Earth 67,000 mph, that may affect the east/west also.
This was one of the most exciting and clearest science presentations I have ever experienced. Professor Phillips is awesome. I had lots of thoughts. One being near to my interests is in the true definition of time and that is time is regulated by the speed of light. The other thing was from that with the comment on “gas” temperature in Washington, the relative level of knowledge and honesty between US Congress and the Science presented here would be proportional to room temperature and the temperatures achieved in Professor Phillip’s Scientific field.
Great video. But one note: At 34:51 Ice does not melt at about 273 degrees Kelvin. It melts at about 273 Kelvin - degrees are not used (or said) on the Kelvin scale.
Sir, Your teachings are so interesting I feel like I can watch you all day knowing I could only understand very little, but have learned a great deal. Thank you
You never stop learning, you may become a teacher but everyone remains a student their entire lives.l....:) keep watching, your learning, faster than you think too!😊
This Professor gave an insightful completely understandable talk on so many great subjects, thank you Sir for allowing a lay person to be as excited as you are in the topics you covered.
@UCTV Great presentation and guest! Thank you Dr. Phillips for your very thoughtful and understandable lecture to us amateur science enthusiasts. 😃 The "time" I spent is immeasurable. Lol.
@John Smith at least their insane beliefs are rooted in a faulty scientific outlook but what about the common delusions of religious people whose beliefs are widely considered a sign of a normal, well-adjusted, good citizen and one who doesnt share those beliefs is considered abnormal? Craziness all around.
38:35 "...I have not spent my entire professional career trying to make half-assed atoms." (Sorry. I just got a kick out of what I thought I had heard for an instant). :-) :-)
time , as we know it , will also be different if we were closer to the center of the milky way than if we were further out than our current position .gravity does have an effect on time , but time here on earth will be different to time in any other part of the universe .
Very interesting topic. Mr. William you made the laser and light topic much easier to understand on how the cooling effect works. It shows us how our universe and world is deeply connected even through the smallest fragments and pieces of what constitutes light and how they change and interact. Lasers cheers !
I have to stop and ask a question.. having just learned that frequencies are colours when talking about light beams.. You say, if you were speeding towards a red, it may, appear green due to the higher frequency.. i know it is only an example, you clarified to say that perceiving a frequency change due to our speed would be impossible if driving a standard vehicle. As heat is fast and cold is slow, you've flipped my red hot and cool green association on its head in your example.. and, i just needed s moment. Lol
And We All - Were Born with Both sides of a Working Brain at ⭕️ Which were destroyed after Birth year by YEAR After Age 8 How😳 By Words, That’s How Language was Designed by Deceivers & Controllers Using Our Feels (Our HEARTS) 🤗 Hearts, Brains & COURAGE = The Wizards of the OZONE Our Purpose of Self is The Mirror on the Wall Again ... 😳
Now that we have flat earth out of the way, this was truly fascinating, I have really never thought twice about the atomic clock, and had no idea of their extreme accuracy...
Good Point ! ... the speed of the Earth turning is affected by the Sloshing around of the Oceans ... causing slight differences in the Length of the Day !
58:40 The gas on the far right hand side of the 3 gasses that is cooled down a lot almost looks like a catenary curve like it's a cloth hanging from the ceiling.
True Expansionism explains The Horzberg Theory with one phrase. The smallest particle in space must be at rest, thus the velocity of the Atom is zero. The time it takes the proton to cross it’s nucleus shifts the clock and makes time travel a possibility.
Instead of measuring from sea level, could we measure from the precise center of earth's inner core to the surface? A distance which will always be the same. ?? I wish all science lecturers were this pleasant to listen to and understandable.
Too bad we can't go further than 12 miles, they don't know about the core, and it is likely wrong, because if molten, it would be past the Currie point and therefore could not be magnetic. They say things with conviction, but try to figure out how many of their claims are actually backed up by empirical experiments.
@@thewizardsofthezoo5376 Geologists say earth's inner core is solid due to extreme pressure. It turns from west to east on earth's geophysical axis. It's surrounded by a liquid outer core which rotates from west to east. Magma and earth's crust surrounds that and rotates west to east but at a different speed as the inner core. This all results in a dynamo that produces electromagnetic bands that surround earth and it's atmosphere.
@@emasolie4135 It's a nice story, but as said above, unless you manage to transcend the fact that metal loses it's magnetic properties when heated up, yes. Otherwise it's a nice story I heard at school, exactly like you did. Also we never went lower than 12 miles below, so geologists guesses are as good as mine or yours, with the difference that they disregard basic physics and I don't, because of you know, science..
@@emasolie4135 You see the big mistake is delegating to someone else your ability to think. If you put salty water in contact with metals and carbon it oxidises and outputs electricity, exactly like in a galvanic cell, where do you find a lot of salty water? You don't need to ask a specialist the answer is everywhere, it is also known as the sea. The sea generates electricity not a supposed molten core that transcends the empirically tested laws of physics.
In the early 1990s, I was lucky enough to get to tour the US Naval Observatory in Washington DC. One of the lucky nights that the sky was clear and we could see Jupiter. No idea if they still are giving tours or not.
39:28 Unclear how pushing something will slow it down. Maybe if you're pushing in the opposite direction of its movement, but you described atoms as moving "around", not travelling straight. Ok, i get it now. You explain at 42:43 - you push from all directions.
I also went to MIT, a common mistake is thinking gps measures angles thus triangulation (using the sine rule) but it really is trilateration, process of measuring distances and calculating bearings using the Cosine rule. Great presentation…reminds me of Feynman
Humans "created" Time. It's biggest difference compared with Space, and it's defining feature as far as I'm concerned is that it is a "one way phenomenon". One cannot stand still in time. We can however, be 'at rest' in Space. Imagine if you could only travel 'North'. Weird
Your thought of 'at rest' is only within a rather small reference frame. The Earth rotates and revolves at a great deal of speed, we track the sun and it also has a high velocity, the galaxy itself is also moving along rapidly. Considered cosmically there is no objectively at rest object or location. Time appears to be a side effect of thermodynamics demanding entropy keep increasing for the overall system.
Time is only linear when we observe it. But in the universe the only way to tell time is what constellation house we're in its cyclical eras we can only observe. 0023% of light & sound theirs so much we can't observe.
Humans created crap, at most. GOD, outside time created it . ...And when time runs us over, and when we run of of it, then we will confirm, but by then, 6 ft under when our mouth be filled with dust, we will wish we had spent the given our time to thank GOD for the moment we had on earth.
Excellent lecture. I had no idea how far we had come with the precision. There really are so many uses for accurate clocks and measurement of the universe. Say, I was thinking. Kinda unrelated to clocks, but, if you make a Bose Einstein condensate via cooling, then hit it like a bell, couldn't that potentially be a way to stimulate a fusion reaction at microscopic scales rather than going the opposite direction with macroscopic heated plasmas. Intuitively I have often wondered regarding the possibility of something approximating a 'solid state' fusion device, where streams of pairs of atoms are fused in a very precisely controlled manner. Anyway just a thought and thank you again for the lovely lecture.
From what I've read and understand Einstein did not come up with the theory of relativity David Hilbert did it first in 1915 November 20th and Einstein did it on the 25th and basically stole Hilbert's work.
@@HeavyMetalRuinedMyLife1971a Because there is no vaccum. "Empty" space is buzzing with particles and anti-particles going in and out of existence. Also i think you fail to realized that there IS pressure in the universe - called the cosmological constant. Time will tell whether dark matter and dark energy will yield to scrutiny.
So, you have something that is that cold. How do you warm something like that without "" boiling" it? Liquid nitrogen boils when it hits the floor. What happens if you throw the coldest temps your achieving on the floor?
So, if we can fine tune light frequencies and adjust the distance of our lasers from an the atoms we are cooling, we create a ratio/analog system of to alter the frequency of moving atoms. The question then becomes, can we tune our analog device to the point where we slow atomic movement down to plank scales? if so what begins to happen? Do we end up creating a black hole? does the atom simply vanish into virtual quantum energy ?Can we get to atoms to tick to a frequency at a rate inconsistent with plank units? Is absolute 0 a time-field boundary like the speed of light C, (causality) and is there any difference between the freezing atoms (the slowing of atomic energy) vs dropping atoms into a black hole (slowing atomic energy via time dilation through gravity). If Einstein -Rosen wormholes exist, wouldn't this be another way to get to them? Imagine having a clock so accurate that it also allows time travel.
A black hole is being created by not creating actually at all but appearing, being the realm in differences being only 1 to infinity depending your stop u take but 1 up/size in growing or 1 down in shrinking you can from this realm even lol but go ahead and look into a telescope or microscope, you won't just be seeing once at that level for example, you be seeing and also tsking the light literally as you see it...a black hole is a microscope literally and as you'd guess for the telescope lol no doubt being a giant n obviously we ain't seen it for it would have sucked us being light into there sight literally lol crazy but just ask and base this only off of a good or bad towards it...it'll tell the truth I swear, just try it. That 50 50 was ur choice yes, but it won't let u be wrong if the good, it'll also make u know it if you in fact question it, but u must do that or else u are going upon a bad. If u understand this it'll let you understand that. Try it...but be careful, the bad can be powerful in this thought, but the good is no doubt being there, just ask that question being the 50 50 then...it'll be able to tell u and like I said. It'll never lie and only guide u to that answer, if u knew more you'd k ow that if based by good or bad, the good being there alone was telling u this already before u ask it, being the question u have is this good in fact, an being u but u need to know ur choice of it is literal being the person u r and will be. What's ur choice with it if knowing it's just that alone...the good being the full truth otherwise not being the good.
Dude, clocks are not broadcasting "information". A clock is a device that makes energy flow very evenly from a local reservoir towards infinity. What we are comparing when we have clocks in different rest frames is the rate of this energy flow. Clocks standing still at different altitudes in a gravitational field are, of course, not even in rest frames...
Physics is IMPOSSIBLE without Philosophy (which is why, even till this day, some universities still call their physics chair "the chair of Natural Philosophy" (e.g. John Hopkins). You're smart. You know this. Everything else you said is really interesting. "Motionless" clocks at different altitudes in a gravitational field are not in rest frames. "A clock is a device that makes energy flow very evenly from a local reservoir towards infinity." Very interesting theory. Tell me more. Einstein was obsessed with invariants because he realized, far before anybody else, the importance of boundary conditions. This is why he predicted entanglement before anybody else despite quantum mechanics sitting in front of everybody's eyes for a decade before he wrote his famous EPR Paradox paper. Time seems to be a measure of entropy - but perhaps I'm off, after all, clocks are made of matter and matter is always undergoing entropy. It's a puzzle. Going back to your comment on philosophy, philosophy is super important in physics and I suspect that is why Einstein was able to make so much more progress than many of his genius contemporaries like Von Neumann or David Hilbert (the latter didn't understand the importance of general covariance in GR), giants of mathematical thinking. He was smarter than them because he had a broader, deeper understanding of the philosophy of logic and the philosophy of science than his counterparts. His study of Goethe and Ernst Mach and Hume and Spinoza and Kant and Schopenhauer all refined his critical thinking nous such that he could see where theories would lead to conceptually without even have to iron out the math. This is perhaps why Einstein, and not Poincare, not Lorentz, conceived of Special Relativity. This is also perhaps why he remained a staunch realist until he died.
they would of been heart shaped had they been fully blown up, you can see the density difference between the big part, and the "ears" as described. I get they couldn't fully blow them up for this context. But had they it would of been more heart shaped.
Einstein once said that gravity and time were so closely related that you couldn't have one with out the other, what if he was less than accurate ? If you have an object so large that it absorbed 100% of gravity, maybe a black hole, the center might be void of gravity, but not necessarily void of energy, as heat is a byproduct and is conductive. Where ever you have heat, you have a potential for change, and some thing to measure with time. I think Einstein was looking at an hour glass when he said that, I think he would have been more accurate to say that energy and time were so closely related that you couldn't have one without the other, and gravity is one form of energy.
Gravity is NOT ENERGY. . IT CANT BE USED AS A Fuel SOURCE WITH OUT THE ADDITIONAL ENERGY . A HYDRO ELECTRIC DAM IS NOT PROOF . YOU HAVE TO LIFT IT BEFORE YOU CAN DROP IT ..
@@p8entlyobvious925 I know why people might say that, it does not appear to have an electrical charge, and no one knows exactly what it is or where it comes from, but it seems to me that it is a result of mass in motion, as a gravity disparity clearly puts other mass in motion. Who says gravity has mass ? I would argue that things without mass are not really things, and even if they were, it would not matter much, as things without matter, don't matter, on account that it is hard to see how some thing not made of matter could effect things that do exist.
@@p8entlyobvious925 It occurs to me that we may subscribe to different theories of how gravity may work, and I emphasize the word "work" as part of my argument for gravity being a form of energy, and I think its a beautiful thing. Einstein reportedly said " imagination was more important than knowledge ", I am sure he was smarter than me, because it is impossible for me to tell which one is more important. I think we could agree that things don't seem to move without a disparity, it sounds like you may think gravity may be the dynamics of disparity in space time. I don't think anyone could say that is wrong, but it is impossible for me to "see" how that works because both time and space are still too mysterious to me, it seems to me they are both dimensions, which I see as tools we have created to describe relationships between things, arbitrary passive numbers we give measurement or value. It is easier for me to "see" how things of matter are impacted by other things of matter, I subscribe to the theory that gravity may be a disparity of energized particles passing through an object in space, that the reason we cling to the earth is because you may have more of these particles impacting you from every direction except from the direction of the earth, as it is absorbing or even possibly deflecting some of them. This theory has been discounted by many because they say there are not enough neutrinos to account for the force, but it would be easy for me to believe that there are more than three flavors of ghost particles, and dark matter that we have not discovered yet. It could well be some combination of these theories and more, who knows ? I wish I could be here the day they figure the mechanics of gravity out
Time... Creation is NOW. Consciousness defines our reality. It is frequency based. We stream consciousness from Source. That streaming, creation, is what we perceive as the passing of time. The double slit experiment proves this. That is why we can only make memories in the present. Also, why when we get excited, we stream more consciousness faster, having the effect of slowing our perception of time. Simple as pi :)
Check out "ChatGPT 101" here: ruclips.net/video/tpoCfSPClsU/видео.html
One of the greatest! Brilliant mind, fantastic sense of humour and a genius in keeping the audience quasi fixated on the speaker.
extremely interesting topic!
Thank you for this lecture, Professor Phillips!
We are so lucky to have free access to this. Thanks to all contributors.
I've been vaguely following all this for decades but it was nice to see it clarified so ably. Very impressively delivered, sir. And fun!
This was a lovely romp through some very detailed material which was just SO expertly brought to life by the enthusiasm and charm of the good doctor. Olympic-grade curiosity and a youthful sense of wonder are hard to beat, Bravo!
Use the word "cool" not referring temperature is just dumb.
38:34 Hilarious!
"But I have not spent my entire professional career trying to make half-fast atoms" ~ Dr. William Phillips
Melbourne Australia deport
Wow! Terrific presentation. Thank you all ... : )
I'm not sure but I do know time seems to be accelerating today and it's not because I'm older either. I hear the younger generation describe the same kind of feeling which is strange. Did anyone ever feel like the day dragged on and on or the complete opposite where you felt like the day was over in what felt like an hour. We all know that can't be possible because time can't be controlled. Or can it?
God knows..
@@star.phased6-3 sure I would hope so
It can be ,and aside of that people are playing with time ,the earth has areas that also is unstable or has portals open up at certain points and times like during odd storms and alignments of planets and so forth,and so.e of us are effected or thrown into these effects and so on and so on and ironically others from those dimensions and times are thrown here with us, there's alot of "Secrets" they don't want the common human to know that a handful do know and it could cost as it has a few lives for this knowledge.
Even my kids are noticing time is flying by. Seems to me when i look back over my 55 years that time was 'elongated' or seemed to last longer. Sorry, can't explain it any better; but, now...it's racing. Be xmas soon at this rate!
@@dominicseanmccann6300 yeah my kids too..I know my younger years felt soooo long and feels like forever ago yet it doesn't...its soo strange!! The past 20 yrs felt so ridiculously fast!!
I very, very much like, how enthusiastic he is about this. Thank you for this!
Wonderful presentation
Fascinating how so much attention to detail is required to be exact or close as possible to exact. Mind blowing how intelligent people are. I can watch this stuff all day.
CJ Bjerknes has written five fascinating books on Einstein. He have proven that Einstein was a fraud, racist and a pervert.
It's insane. Physics is, imo, even harder than pure mathematics because in physics your theories are supposed to be proven by experimentation. Thats HARD.
Anyone can do what's easy. It's the ones who choose to do what's hard that make the important discoveries and change the way everyone thinks and lives. A person can change the world by choosing to do what's hard.
We r stupid the maya could do a clock with three big rocks!! In the form of gears.
I'm glad you got your GPS facts right. Like needing 3 satellites for telemetry and a 4th for time synchronization.
Here's something you might not know about GPS that I learned from the original source of the technology. All GPS time data is partial encrypted all the time and capable of being fully encrypted at a moments notice. The ability to fully encrypt the data stream is probably apparent to everyone knowing that it is a military technology since the ability to use it is a privilege granted by the government and would be encrypted immediately if the need to do so is determined by the Joint Chiefs or President which would make everything other than military GPS equipment completely and utterly useless. The partial encryption I mentioned is that the nanoseconds (arbitrarily speaking because I don't remember the exact cutoff where encryption begins and wouldn't be able to say even if I did remember) are encrypted by the military [the Navy being the original developer of the technology in the late 60's and early 70's and maintainer of the 32 satellite constellation although the role may have shifted to another entity by now] so that the very fine precision data needed to determine the telemetric distances to within an inch is lost. So to compensate for this civilian equipment must use the data from all satellites that are available at any given time (since the GPS constellation is not geosynchronous and satellites are constantly coming into and out of your line of sight) and use complex algorithms in order to get a similar location precision that the military gets using only 4 satellites with encrypted equipment. I say similar but it's really not because the military gear can tell your location exactly to within less than an inch while civilian equipment can really only intuitively guess your precise location which can be illustrated by bringing your location up on Google Maps and see exactly how precise it is while somewhere with little to no landmarks such as roads etc for it to reference and watch your location bounce around while you stand still and likely never be steadily within a foot of your true location. It's good enough to fullfil it's purpose as a location aid and no where near enough to use for targeting. So yeah. What people don't know about the things they use every day is astronomically astounding but then again is ignorance bliss? I mean ignorance is bliss...?
It’s great that it can be turned off
Thanks for the dope
Hello from SanDiego
Surveyors have better GPS interpretation built into their equipment than a smart phone's GPS capability . A surveyor can determine their location within millimeters and do so by using the signal from a minimum of 7 GPS sattelites.
No other satelites, other than the dedicated GPS ones, are included (or whatever you meant).
A foot seems reasonably accurate wuldnt you say?
If we take into consideration that we use this also for smart ai driving automobiles than the difference of a few centimeters can do a difference between life and deaths, and this is why i see this as unacceptable to be restricted from public use. Yes, it can be used for malicious things, but so alot of other things that gets regalement.
Dr Philips got a Nobel Prize in 1997.... surely got 'his' GPS facts right... :-) - otherwise, great information!
Einstein said those who truly understand can explain it to a 6year-old. I am now enlightened, thks.
You just have to learn to spell ,you'll have it all
@@nooffence7670 And you need to learn how to punctuate your sentences. Is it not great that we can learn something from each other?👍
This guy is very funny Time mag. Washington DC hot air? Why isn't that audience laughing?
You spelled offense wrong my friend. Love.
Right on Tom
İt was a pleasure to watch this lecture. Thanks all.
Classic - 38:38 he said this without laughing, "I have not spent my entire professional career trying to make half-fast atoms"
I was just checking the comments to see if anyone else noticed. :)
That went into far deeper and more interesting territory than I expected it would. Love the first hand experience at the intersection of many evolving technologies.
No
I fell asleep watching something else, I woke up to this. I was about to turn it off because I don't typically watch TV in my sleep not to mention I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. But as I looked for the remote I heard enthusiasm so I watched. While I don't understand the topic what I do understand is human behavior, statistics, profiling, everything that has anything to do with why people act or feel a certain way. What I just saw was one of the most beautiful things about humanity, passion! I could listen to both of you talk all day and not have a clue what you're talking about because you both have so much passion in the topic that I find it refreshing. Everyday people complain and I ask them "what makes you smile no matter what, what drives you, makes you talk" they don't remember. Never ever lose that passion, it's such a beautiful gift.
Wonderful commentary. I completely agree!
Thank you Sir.. For the knowledge delivered.
Appreciate the TIME you have ALSO devoted to becoming ""fluent" in language that is comprehensible to the widest range of listeners possible!
The mark of a true EDUCATOR as opposed to a TEACHER!
MUCH RESPECT!
THANK YOU!
This is one of the very best scientific explanations I've ever seen. I envy the students who get to hear this professor on a regular basis. He explains a lot about how science works.
teachers can / could / sometimes do / be cool & guide us through heady ,hairy environments of theory , rules & baselines which are often intellectually challenging to the layperson . I understand what you mean about envying the student of this teacher on any regular course's duration.💡🧠🤓
He's a Nobel Prize winner. Absolutely brilliant professor!
@@feynmanschwingere_mc2270 wow. fortunate is the student entitled to a sit-down before this teacher,to be sure!
Great Video Buddy ... As Usual ... Congrats ... Thanks for sharing
Great video, loved it.
Time changes depending on who is looking at it. The entire universe, that we peer into from multiple vantages can slam shut in a moment. Orders of magnitude are beyond our capacity to "grasp." (Imagine being sent to hell for one day, but to your sense, it seems like 10,000 years.)
WOW THIS COMMENT OF YOURS IS SOOO SMART & WISE & WELL EXPLAINED THANKS...
@@louiseevans5752 I dont know what people are thinking, comments make me realize a ton of people are walking around not in their right minds but can operate computers and type, prolly drive too. Scary.
Fantastic lecture by the great William Phillips - a man who has accomplished so many pioneering things in his wonderful career. I will be sending this video to my nieces and nephews who have developed a passion for science. Thanks for making this. I have some things to say about the lecture.
Fun Fact: It was Albert Einstein who first predicted the Boson, which is critical to the creation of atomic clocks. It was Einstein's work on Bose-Einstein Statistics and Bose-Einstein Condensates which gave us the theory upon which ultracold atoms are created. Einstein's work on spontaneous and stimulated emission ALONE has garnered several Nobel Prizes. Einstein is usually revered as the father of special and general relativity (which he is). However, founding director of the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research professor Manuel Cardona showed in his 2005 ArXiv article on the history of physics that Einstein is actually the father of Solid State Physics as well as the broader version of the field known as Condensed Matter Physics (which includes liquids). Einstein's 1907 article on the specific heat of solids introduced, for the first time, the effect of lattice vibrations on the thermodynamic properties of crystals, in particular the specific heat. His 1905 article on the photoelectric effect and photoluminescence opened the fields of photoelectron spectroscopy and photoluminescence spectroscopy. Other important achievements - he did so many, it's impossible to list them all here - include the aforementioned Bose-Einstein condensation and the Einstein relation between the diffusion coefficient an mobility.
The Einstein-De Haas Effect (one of his few endeavors into experimental, rather than theoretical, physics) was brilliant and ahead of its time. His work on quantum choas, in which he shows how (and why) the old Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rules are inadequate, was 60 years ahead of its time and only recently have physicists properly understood the implications of that paper. If you would like to read the paper in it's entirety to get a glimpse of Einstein's unparalleled physics genius, Google "Einstein's Unknown Insight and the Problem of Quantizing Choas" by A. Douglas Stone of Yale University. The guy was a super genius and saw things even other geniuses of his era failed to see (a great example being his seminal work on quantum entanglement as formalized in what are now known as EPR Correlations). Einstein's work on entanglement essentially created the field of quantum information science. And I haven't even gotten to his work on the foundations of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, his work on phonons, his work on wave-particle duality (13 years before De Broglie), his work on wormholes, etc. Einstein's work on Bose-Einstein statistics (and his novel approach to deriving Planck's distribution) directly lead Schrodinger to the discovery of the famous wave-function equation all undergrad physics student still study today when they learn quantum mechanics.
Oh and just for giggles, he also solved the centuries-long problem known as the Tea Leaf paradox in his free time. Because, well, when you're a super genius that's just what you do.
I doubt we will see another Einstein for quite some time. What an inspiration!
Thanks for the reference (M. Cardona 2005)
Yes. He was created by the largely zionist media by plagiarizing theories of Hendrik Lorentz, Henri Poincare, George Maxwell and Max Planck to create a poster child for zionism and the “superior” jewish intellect.
Think about it: How can a second level patent clerk with NO education, NO laboratories, NO partnerships, NO credentials, NO funding…can come up with all these groundbreaking theories AFTER they were developed by those I mentioned above?
Believe what you want, but the more you question…the more you realize the illusion of truth.
@@yyaa2539 Yes. He was created by the largely zionist media by plagiarizing theories of Hendrik Lorentz, Henri Poincare, George Maxwell and Max Planck to create a poster child for zionism and the “superior” jewish intellect.
Think about it: How can a second level patent clerk with NO education, NO laboratories, NO partnerships, NO credentials, NO funding…can come up with all these groundbreaking theories AFTER they were developed by those I mentioned above?
Believe what you want, but the more you question…the more you realize the illusion of truth.
@@LAZY_PHILOMATH very interesting....I've never thought of that before....very interesting....can you elaborate more ?
@@yyaa2539 Public schools were infiltrated so the overwhelming majority of Humanity believe the Lies taught. It takes some serious digging to get to the real Truth, just remember that History is always written by the Victors, so follow the money.
JESUS THIS "INTRODUCTION" IS EFFING BRUTAL - SCREW ACADEMICS. SO PRETENTIOUS AND STIFF YET FLOWERY.
👏👏👏👏👏👏 bloody brilliant. Thank you so much for inspiring me further.
We perceive time as a portion of our entire experience . As its fraction diminishes so does its relative duration. Time itself is just a construct of man to keep track of the cycles; and they remain , like the clockworks invented to mimic them , regular and constant without variation.
That was definitely worth the many pico seconds I spent watching it.
a question. looking at that ruff brake down of the atomic clock at 22:10, is what direction is the cesium traveling? what difference does that make? you may ask, in the Hafele & Keating experiment one clock went east with a -60 nano-secunda timing error, and a west clock had a +275 nano-secunda error, traveling about 400 mph. so, the clock should show a variation depending on direction the atoms are going, the Earth is rotating on its axis of about 700 mph, over 1,000 at the equator. if you point north or south (noon/midnight) you should consider the orbital speed of the Earth 67,000 mph, that may affect the east/west also.
All clocks are the same unless being at a different size completely...it's why time dialect happens. They left that part out.
@@queyzar6735 please forgive my ignorance, I do not understand what you mean by "size" & "dialect". it may be an autocorrect/translation error
This was one of the most exciting and clearest science presentations I have ever experienced. Professor Phillips is awesome. I had lots of thoughts. One being near to my interests is in the true definition of time and that is time is regulated by the speed of light. The other thing was from that with the comment on “gas” temperature in Washington, the relative level of knowledge and honesty between US Congress and the Science presented here would be proportional to room temperature and the temperatures achieved in Professor Phillip’s Scientific field.
The world is flat
@@madmesh978 spacetime isnt
@@SolidSiren that will be the echo I hear when I talk into you're ear
Mourinho portimao
@@SolidSiren cbc
Very interesting and absorbing lecture
Great video. But one note: At 34:51 Ice does not melt at about 273 degrees Kelvin. It melts at about 273 Kelvin - degrees are not used (or said) on the Kelvin scale.
Excellent presentation. Thank you so much.
Sir, Your teachings are so interesting I feel like I can watch you all day knowing I could only understand very little, but have learned a great deal. Thank you
aww thank you
@@tylerlofall1879 no. me.
J o o lover
You never stop learning, you may become a teacher but everyone remains a student their entire lives.l....:) keep watching, your learning, faster than you think too!😊
I see a lot of great lectures. This one stands out.
Delightful presentation!
Many quite interesting concepts touched on here :D
Great explanation on laser cooling.
absolutely intrigued🤓👍👍🤔🤗thx so much
This Professor gave an insightful completely understandable talk on so many great subjects, thank you Sir for allowing a lay person to be as excited as you are in the topics you covered.
if you like these kinds of science presentations you should definitely check out the *Royal Institution* lectures ...especially the Christmas ones
Agreed, and you said it better than i could.
@@valentinobosh36 thank you
well said!
Thanks for the video.
@UCTV Great presentation and guest! Thank you Dr. Phillips for your very thoughtful and understandable lecture to us amateur science enthusiasts. 😃 The "time" I spent is immeasurable. Lol.
Such a pleasure to listen a brilliant man.
Great wisdom thanks for sharing
I believe the civilization that came before us knew this stuff like common knowledge amongst themselves
They would have found the whole of theoretical science a solid joke, and astronomy a farce.
@John Smith at least their insane beliefs are rooted in a faulty scientific outlook but what about the common delusions of religious people whose beliefs are widely considered a sign of a normal, well-adjusted, good citizen and one who doesnt share those beliefs is considered abnormal? Craziness all around.
"These two dorks are standing" 😂
Caught me by surprise.
38:35
"...I have not spent my entire professional career trying to make half-assed atoms."
(Sorry. I just got a kick out of what I thought I had heard for an instant).
:-) :-)
time , as we know it , will also be different if we were closer to the center of the milky way than if we were further out than our current position .gravity does have an effect on time , but time here on earth will be different to time in any other part of the universe .
Very interesting topic. Mr. William you made the laser and light topic much easier to understand on how the cooling effect works. It shows us how our universe and world is deeply connected even through the smallest fragments and pieces of what constitutes light and how they change and interact.
Lasers cheers !
Superb Talk!
"Well, a factor of two isn't bad, but I haven't spent my entire professional career trying to make half-fast atoms." (38:33)
😑...😐...😁...😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣
Thanks for this lecture, great stuff.
I have to stop and ask a question.. having just learned that frequencies are colours when talking about light beams..
You say, if you were speeding towards a red, it may, appear green due to the higher frequency.. i know it is only an example, you clarified to say that perceiving a frequency change due to our speed would be impossible if driving a standard vehicle.
As heat is fast and cold is slow, you've flipped my red hot and cool green association on its head in your example.. and, i just needed s moment. Lol
FYI The Polynesian navigated across oceans using stars, weather etc. They didn't use any devices but were just perfectly tuned to the nature
We are losing the ability with our reliance on technology.
Tesla and Brown were the real things, Einstein was a distance 3rd.
And We All - Were Born with Both sides of a Working Brain at ⭕️
Which were destroyed after Birth year by YEAR After Age 8
How😳
By Words, That’s How
Language was Designed by Deceivers & Controllers
Using Our Feels (Our HEARTS) 🤗
Hearts, Brains & COURAGE = The Wizards of the OZONE
Our Purpose of Self is The Mirror on the Wall Again ... 😳
Why was Einstein not the real thing ?😂
He was a mason i heard
@@dr.fauci_tortured_n_killed5034 research if you can
@@dr.fauci_tortured_n_killed5034 I've given you a thumbs up for both the comment and the name !
Now that we have flat earth out of the way, this was truly fascinating, I have really never thought twice about the atomic clock, and had no idea of their extreme accuracy...
Flat Earth?
”i have never really thought twice”. - you saying what we all knew
28:54 The Speaker is showing a video of himself and speaking over it and when he says 'Hot Gas' he also is saying it in the video. 🤣
Holy crap 😂😂😂👏
Good Point ! ... the speed of the Earth turning is affected by the Sloshing around of the Oceans ... causing slight differences in the Length of the Day !
58:40 The gas on the far right hand side of the 3 gasses that is cooled down a lot almost looks like a catenary curve like it's a cloth hanging from the ceiling.
Que bonito todo eso!! Muchas Gracias!
What can I say? Fantastic! Amazing! Stupendous! Miraculous! WOW!
YOU AINT SEEN PLANET X STAR,,,,,,,YOU AINT SEEN NOTHING YET 😱
Really exciting, cool stuff!
Thank you for this is . What great minds!
Excellent - I love the energy and enthusiasm! Very Inspiring - and exciting.
I live in Karachi Pakistan and I like your comment if you don't .
Did you know that Einstein was a black indigenous European? Please see untouched photos of him if you can find them.
What is the name of this amazing scientist and teacher?
Director of Earth rotation... Now that is a job description!
True Expansionism explains The Horzberg Theory with one phrase. The smallest particle in space must be at rest, thus the velocity of the Atom is zero. The time it takes the proton to cross it’s nucleus shifts the clock and makes time travel a possibility.
Charles A.A. Dellschau (1830 - 1923)
This is cool 👍
Instead of measuring from sea level, could we measure from the precise center of earth's inner core to the surface? A distance which will always be the same. ?? I wish all science lecturers were this pleasant to listen to and understandable.
Too bad we can't go further than 12 miles, they don't know about the core, and it is likely wrong, because if molten, it would be past the Currie point and therefore could not be magnetic.
They say things with conviction, but try to figure out how many of their claims are actually backed up by empirical experiments.
@@thewizardsofthezoo5376 Geologists say earth's inner core is solid due to extreme pressure. It turns from west to east on earth's geophysical axis. It's surrounded by a liquid outer core which rotates from west to east. Magma and earth's crust surrounds that and rotates west to east but at a different speed as the inner core. This all results in a dynamo that produces electromagnetic bands that surround earth and it's atmosphere.
@@emasolie4135 It's a nice story, but as said above, unless you manage to transcend the fact that metal loses it's magnetic properties when heated up, yes.
Otherwise it's a nice story I heard at school, exactly like you did.
Also we never went lower than 12 miles below, so geologists guesses are as good as mine or yours, with the difference that they disregard basic physics and I don't, because of you know, science..
@@thewizardsofthezoo5376 It's a subject for you to take up with the USGS.
@@emasolie4135 You see the big mistake is delegating to someone else your ability to think.
If you put salty water in contact with metals and carbon it oxidises and outputs electricity, exactly like in a galvanic cell, where do you find a lot of salty water?
You don't need to ask a specialist the answer is everywhere, it is also known as the sea.
The sea generates electricity not a supposed molten core that transcends the empirically tested laws of physics.
In the early 1990s, I was lucky enough to get to tour the US Naval Observatory in Washington DC. One of the lucky nights that the sky was clear and we could see Jupiter. No idea if they still are giving tours or not.
Hartmut is also my Dad's name. Old school German name. Great lecture by the way. Much appreciated.
Thank You
Thank you very mutch, very cool!
Fantastic thank you
Today at At 35:48 I learned that Antartica can get cold enough to freeze (or maybe deposition) Carbon Dioxide
39:28 Unclear how pushing something will slow it down. Maybe if you're pushing in the opposite direction of its movement, but you described atoms as moving "around", not travelling straight. Ok, i get it now. You explain at 42:43 - you push from all directions.
I also went to MIT, a common mistake is thinking gps measures angles thus triangulation (using the sine rule) but it really is trilateration, process of measuring distances and calculating bearings using the Cosine rule. Great presentation…reminds me of Feynman
Yep, SSS not ASA.
This guy has the coolest tie ever!
Humans "created" Time. It's biggest difference compared with Space, and it's defining feature as far as I'm concerned is that it is a "one way phenomenon". One cannot stand still in time. We can however, be 'at rest' in Space. Imagine if you could only travel 'North'. Weird
Your thought of 'at rest' is only within a rather small reference frame. The Earth rotates and revolves at a great deal of speed, we track the sun and it also has a high velocity, the galaxy itself is also moving along rapidly. Considered cosmically there is no objectively at rest object or location. Time appears to be a side effect of thermodynamics demanding entropy keep increasing for the overall system.
What does hu-man mean?
The word human comes from the Latin word “humus,” meaning earth or 👉🏿ground👈🏿
Time is only linear when we observe it. But in the universe the only way to tell time is what constellation house we're in its cyclical eras we can only observe. 0023% of light & sound theirs so much we can't observe.
Humans created crap, at most. GOD, outside time created it . ...And when time runs us over, and when we run of of it, then we will confirm, but by then, 6 ft under when our mouth be filled with dust, we will wish we had spent the given our time to thank GOD for the moment we had on earth.
Excellent lecture. I had no idea how far we had come with the precision. There really are so many uses for accurate clocks and measurement of the universe.
Say, I was thinking. Kinda unrelated to clocks, but, if you make a Bose Einstein condensate via cooling, then hit it like a bell, couldn't that potentially be a way to stimulate a fusion reaction at microscopic scales rather than going the opposite direction with macroscopic heated plasmas.
Intuitively I have often wondered regarding the possibility of something approximating a 'solid state' fusion device, where streams of pairs of atoms are fused in a very precisely controlled manner.
Anyway just a thought and thank you again for the lovely lecture.
AREA P
Like watching false regurgitation..Holy shit are we in trouble...baabaabaa
From what I've read and understand Einstein did not come up with the theory of relativity David Hilbert did it first in 1915 November 20th and Einstein did it on the 25th and basically stole Hilbert's work.
Wow - excellent!
I agree I came to the same conclusion we are never ever ever in the same place twice
@ 1:09:00 -- the scientific consensus is that the universe is still expanding, so I'm thinking he probably meant hyperinflation ended, not inflation.
Does "space vacuum" even exist?
I mean, how can a pressurised system (earth) coexist alongside a vacuum (space) without solid separation?
@@HeavyMetalRuinedMyLife1971a Because there is no vaccum. "Empty" space is buzzing with particles and anti-particles going in and out of existence.
Also i think you fail to realized that there IS pressure in the universe - called the cosmological constant. Time will tell whether dark matter and dark energy will yield to scrutiny.
Although I haven't go the foggiest about science, I still enjoyed this lecture
So, you have something that is that cold. How do you warm something like that without "" boiling" it? Liquid nitrogen boils when it hits the floor. What happens if you throw the coldest temps your achieving on the floor?
Theories are not REALITY.....,
So, if we can fine tune light frequencies and adjust the distance of our lasers from an the atoms we are cooling, we create a ratio/analog system of to alter the frequency of moving atoms. The question then becomes, can we tune our analog device to the point where we slow atomic movement down to plank scales? if so what begins to happen? Do we end up creating a black hole? does the atom simply vanish into virtual quantum energy ?Can we get to atoms to tick to a frequency at a rate inconsistent with plank units? Is absolute 0 a time-field boundary like the speed of light C, (causality) and is there any difference between the freezing atoms (the slowing of atomic energy) vs dropping atoms into a black hole (slowing atomic energy via time dilation through gravity).
If Einstein -Rosen wormholes exist, wouldn't this be another way to get to them?
Imagine having a clock so accurate that it also allows time travel.
A black hole is being created by not creating actually at all but appearing, being the realm in differences being only 1 to infinity depending your stop u take but 1 up/size in growing or 1 down in shrinking you can from this realm even lol but go ahead and look into a telescope or microscope, you won't just be seeing once at that level for example, you be seeing and also tsking the light literally as you see it...a black hole is a microscope literally and as you'd guess for the telescope lol no doubt being a giant n obviously we ain't seen it for it would have sucked us being light into there sight literally lol crazy but just ask and base this only off of a good or bad towards it...it'll tell the truth I swear, just try it. That 50 50 was ur choice yes, but it won't let u be wrong if the good, it'll also make u know it if you in fact question it, but u must do that or else u are going upon a bad. If u understand this it'll let you understand that. Try it...but be careful, the bad can be powerful in this thought, but the good is no doubt being there, just ask that question being the 50 50 then...it'll be able to tell u and like I said. It'll never lie and only guide u to that answer, if u knew more you'd k ow that if based by good or bad, the good being there alone was telling u this already before u ask it, being the question u have is this good in fact, an being u but u need to know ur choice of it is literal being the person u r and will be. What's ur choice with it if knowing it's just that alone...the good being the full truth otherwise not being the good.
Dude, clocks are not broadcasting "information". A clock is a device that makes energy flow very evenly from a local reservoir towards infinity. What we are comparing when we have clocks in different rest frames is the rate of this energy flow. Clocks standing still at different altitudes in a gravitational field are, of course, not even in rest frames...
8
@@johniozzi1847 9 .
@@everythingisalllies2141 And there is the kid who doesn't understand that physics is neither philosophy nor religion. ;-)
@@everythingisalllies2141 Don't worry, kiddo. I am giving attention to lonely kids like you all day long. No need to get desperate. ;-)
Physics is IMPOSSIBLE without Philosophy (which is why, even till this day, some universities still call their physics chair "the chair of Natural Philosophy" (e.g. John Hopkins). You're smart. You know this. Everything else you said is really interesting. "Motionless" clocks at different altitudes in a gravitational field are not in rest frames. "A clock is a device that makes energy flow very evenly from a local reservoir towards infinity." Very interesting theory. Tell me more. Einstein was obsessed with invariants because he realized, far before anybody else, the importance of boundary conditions. This is why he predicted entanglement before anybody else despite quantum mechanics sitting in front of everybody's eyes for a decade before he wrote his famous EPR Paradox paper. Time seems to be a measure of entropy - but perhaps I'm off, after all, clocks are made of matter and matter is always undergoing entropy. It's a puzzle.
Going back to your comment on philosophy, philosophy is super important in physics and I suspect that is why Einstein was able to make so much more progress than many of his genius contemporaries like Von Neumann or David Hilbert (the latter didn't understand the importance of general covariance in GR), giants of mathematical thinking. He was smarter than them because he had a broader, deeper understanding of the philosophy of logic and the philosophy of science than his counterparts. His study of Goethe and Ernst Mach and Hume and Spinoza and Kant and Schopenhauer all refined his critical thinking nous such that he could see where theories would lead to conceptually without even have to iron out the math. This is perhaps why Einstein, and not Poincare, not Lorentz, conceived of Special Relativity.
This is also perhaps why he remained a staunch realist until he died.
13:50 If earth's rotation isn't constant, maybe all clocks should be adjusted to earth's rotation.
How can I do this at home, reproduce it....41 min
Brain candy… thanks for sharing with us!!! Wow
Oh! I forgot to say- Super Kool!
they would of been heart shaped had they been fully blown up, you can see the density difference between the big part, and the "ears" as described. I get they couldn't fully blow them up for this context. But had they it would of been more heart shaped.
Einstein once said that gravity and time were so closely related that you couldn't have one with out the other, what if he was less than accurate ? If you have an object so large that it absorbed 100% of gravity, maybe a black hole, the center might be void of gravity, but not necessarily void of energy, as heat is a byproduct and is conductive. Where ever you have heat, you have a potential for change, and some thing to measure with time. I think Einstein was looking at an hour glass when he said that, I think he would have been more accurate to say that energy and time were so closely related that you couldn't have one without the other, and gravity is one form of energy.
Gravity is NOT ENERGY. . IT CANT BE USED AS A Fuel SOURCE WITH OUT THE ADDITIONAL ENERGY . A HYDRO ELECTRIC DAM IS NOT PROOF . YOU HAVE TO LIFT IT BEFORE YOU CAN DROP IT ..
@@p8entlyobvious925 I know why people might say that, it does not appear to have an electrical charge, and no one knows exactly what it is or where it comes from, but it seems to me that it is a result of mass in motion, as a gravity disparity clearly puts other mass in motion. Who says gravity has mass ? I would argue that things without mass are not really things, and even if they were, it would not matter much, as things without matter, don't matter, on account that it is hard to see how some thing not made of matter could effect things that do exist.
@@jondoe6068 mass bends space time .
@@p8entlyobvious925 It occurs to me that we may subscribe to different theories of how gravity may work, and I emphasize the word "work" as part of my argument for gravity being a form of energy, and I think its a beautiful thing. Einstein reportedly said " imagination was more important than knowledge ", I am sure he was smarter than me, because it is impossible for me to tell which one is more important. I think we could agree that things don't seem to move without a disparity, it sounds like you may think gravity may be the dynamics of disparity in space time. I don't think anyone could say that is wrong, but it is impossible for me to "see" how that works because both time and space are still too mysterious to me, it seems to me they are both dimensions, which I see as tools we have created to describe relationships between things, arbitrary passive numbers we give measurement or value. It is easier for me to "see" how things of matter are impacted by other things of matter, I subscribe to the theory that gravity may be a disparity of energized particles passing through an object in space, that the reason we cling to the earth is because you may have more of these particles impacting you from every direction except from the direction of the earth, as it is absorbing or even possibly deflecting some of them. This theory has been discounted by many because they say there are not enough neutrinos to account for the force, but it would be easy for me to believe that there are more than three flavors of ghost particles, and dark matter that we have not discovered yet. It could well be some combination of these theories and more, who knows ? I wish I could be here the day they figure the mechanics of gravity out
@@jondoe6068 . You said *Work". Gravity doesn't do work. Energy Equals mass . If gravity is a force WHERE is is the mass being turned into energy.?
Be nice to be able to find that photo of glowing sodium atoms.
Time... Creation is NOW. Consciousness defines our reality. It is frequency based. We stream consciousness from Source. That streaming, creation, is what we perceive as the passing of time. The double slit experiment proves this. That is why we can only make memories in the present. Also, why when we get excited, we stream more consciousness faster, having the effect of slowing our perception of time. Simple as pi :)
ONLY person, Tesla spoke ill of... Einstein...
⚠️ Since the Nature (the Universe) does work (operate) by Trials & Errors, the concept of 'time' is preposterous.
1:17:37 Also, one has to ask: Completely still in relation to what?