Marijn van Putten has provided substantial research on the early Uthmanic text and its transmission, but he does not support the claim that there are "hereditary scribal errors" in the Uthmanic codices. Instead, his work emphasizes the consistency of the Uthmanic archetype, pointing out that the early Quranic manuscripts exhibit orthographic idiosyncrasies that stem from pre-classical Arabic writing practices. These non-standard spellings do not reflect scribal mistakes but rather an adherence to an earlier written exemplar from which copies were made. Van Putten's findings suggest that the Uthmanic text was faithfully transmitted, with any variations stemming from early Arabic orthographic conventions rather than errors( Brill )( Cambridge University Press & Assessment ). Thus, van Putten's research reinforces the reliability of the Uthmanic text and disputes any notions of significant transmission errors or hereditary mistakes within the codices.
@mhnv9436 does not support the claim that they are hereditary scribal errors? So what's this then ruclips.net/video/9_0YFe8a5rs/видео.htmlsi=dmNVYffWy1pIM8rl
Alhamdulilah, very well documented in the tradition from the beginning, the companions new about them and decided not to change them as they were not seen as errors or in validating the reading.
@@inquisitivemind007 The Quran is BY FAR ( as till the very END of the Universe ) the MOST PRESERVED religious book in the universe of all ! EVERY SINGLE of the ARABIC letters, except the letter A ( Alif or Hamzah ).................are 100% accurate since day one
Mind showing me where in this presentation it says that these differences were hereditary? I'm of the impression, currently, that Sidky doesn't believe that there really are hereditary scribal errors, due to what he said on his interview with Paul Williams on Blogging Theology.
It's addressed here ruclips.net/video/BdgwgcrOCu4/видео.html and here web.archive.org/web/20210723202034/twitter.com/therealsidky/status/1418667335251075075
That’s why Any books can be preserved in written form for a long time period authentically if we don’t preserve it in also oral form like Quran. See Torah & Injil were easily corrupted by banu-Israel because of written form
@@farhanwyne6040 So you know the fact? Then show me the proof. Show me the mushaf kept by Hafsa and show me original Othmanic mushaf. If you can provide me both mushaf, then I belief you.
This dude basically telling that Quran is not preserved as Muslim is claiming that the Quran is perferctly preserved - letter to letter, dote to dote. So, don't get duped by any Muslim apologetics.
Hythem Sidky literally says that these "errors" are non hereditary in this video 👇🏻 because there's a secondary control mechanism ( it's what we call oral transmission.) ! ruclips.net/video/9SCECRhQHW0/видео.htmlsi=KkTiw8xdtvB7sydy Start listening at the the twentieth minute. 20:00
Why was quaranic manuscripts not available to rest of the world? Perfect preservation a modern invention. Later corrections made to various manuscripts to fit Kairo text.
The Quran is BY FAR ( as till the very END of the Universe ) the MOST PRESERVED religious book in the universe of all ! EVERY SINGLE of the ARABIC letters, except the letter A ( Alif or Hamzah ).................are 100% accurate since day one
Marijn van Putten has provided substantial research on the early Uthmanic text and its transmission, but he does not support the claim that there are "hereditary scribal errors" in the Uthmanic codices. Instead, his work emphasizes the consistency of the Uthmanic archetype, pointing out that the early Quranic manuscripts exhibit orthographic idiosyncrasies that stem from pre-classical Arabic writing practices. These non-standard spellings do not reflect scribal mistakes but rather an adherence to an earlier written exemplar from which copies were made. Van Putten's findings suggest that the Uthmanic text was faithfully transmitted, with any variations stemming from early Arabic orthographic conventions rather than errors(
Brill
)(
Cambridge University Press & Assessment
).
Thus, van Putten's research reinforces the reliability of the Uthmanic text and disputes any notions of significant transmission errors or hereditary mistakes within the codices.
@mhnv9436 does not support the claim that they are hereditary scribal errors? So what's this then ruclips.net/video/9_0YFe8a5rs/видео.htmlsi=dmNVYffWy1pIM8rl
Alhamdulilah, very well documented in the tradition and nothing new respectfully but it is good what he is doing for the people who are unfamiliar.
You have known it for a long time, and yet muslims claim that there isnt any error or contradiction in the quran? Talk about lying.
Love that you're keeping it going
Alhamdulilah, very well documented in the tradition from the beginning, the companions new about them and decided not to change them as they were not seen as errors or in validating the reading.
@@elliot7205 brother these are islamophobes, dont be fooled
But most importantly its memorized exactly how the Sahaba read it,we have a link of people who can trace their teachers back until the sahaba
Really? So how did the Arabic letter hamzah get into the Quran then? ruclips.net/video/khJElQasu-E/видео.htmlsi=OV0BPx_2ASMMIQ4t
@@inquisitivemind007
The Quran is BY FAR ( as till the very END of the Universe )
the
MOST PRESERVED religious book in the universe of all !
EVERY SINGLE of the ARABIC letters,
except the letter A ( Alif or Hamzah ).................are 100% accurate since day one
Mind showing me where in this presentation it says that these differences were hereditary? I'm of the impression, currently, that Sidky doesn't believe that there really are hereditary scribal errors, due to what he said on his interview with Paul Williams on Blogging Theology.
It's addressed here ruclips.net/video/BdgwgcrOCu4/видео.html and here web.archive.org/web/20210723202034/twitter.com/therealsidky/status/1418667335251075075
That’s why Any books can be preserved in written form for a long time period authentically if we don’t preserve it in also oral form like Quran. See Torah & Injil were easily corrupted by banu-Israel because of written form
Quran is not preserved letter to letter and dot to dot but it preserved the message that Allah passed down to prophet and followers until today.
The Torah is preserved letter by letter for the past 2300 years.
@@gamejew38 Proof it...
@maz The Quran is preserved letter to letter and dot to dot. Stop spreading nonsense while you don't know the facts!
Classic reason, your Quran just copying from pagan believer
@@farhanwyne6040 So you know the fact? Then show me the proof. Show me the mushaf kept by Hafsa and show me original Othmanic mushaf. If you can provide me both mushaf, then I belief you.
This dude basically telling that Quran is not preserved as Muslim is claiming that the Quran is perferctly preserved - letter to letter, dote to dote. So, don't get duped by any Muslim apologetics.
Hythem Sidky literally says that these "errors" are non hereditary in this video 👇🏻 because there's a secondary control mechanism ( it's what we call oral transmission.) !
ruclips.net/video/9SCECRhQHW0/видео.htmlsi=KkTiw8xdtvB7sydy
Start listening at the the twentieth minute.
20:00
grow up
Why was quaranic manuscripts not available to rest of the world? Perfect preservation a modern invention. Later corrections made to various manuscripts to fit Kairo text.
The Quran is BY FAR ( as till the very END of the Universe )
the
MOST PRESERVED religious book in the universe of all !
EVERY SINGLE of the ARABIC letters,
except the letter A ( Alif or Hamzah ).................are 100% accurate since day one
Is Sidky a Muslim?
Yes he is