I couldn't take my eyes off of it. Definitely a psychological weapon if there ever was one! ;) :P (I hope he takes all of this in stride. All in good fun, sir!) :)
It's very hard to get it to stay still for a photo shoot - the best way is to put some food down for it, with the camera already set up for the shot. Bit like a David Attenborough programme.
He has such a wonderfully archaic vocabulary (and I mean that in a good way). His choice of words is straight out of a 1930s Evelyn Waugh novel or a Biggles book.
Well, yes and no. From the little research i made, it seems to be that flamethrowers (and other incendiary weapons) are not allowed to be used against civilians. Otherwise it's fine to use flamethrowers.
@@tigercat418 Flamethrowers aren't banned by the Geneva Convention. You're definitely allowed to use them in fighting against hardened targets like bunkers or cave/tunnel systems. Or to remove plant cover if the enemy is using it to hide. They are however mentioned in the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. Which bans their use against civilian targets.
I wonder if 50-60 years from now ex-Abrams operators will be complaining about how it was a death trap the way Sherman operators did with it (despite statistically low casualties overall)
@@discipleofdagon8195 I highly doubt it. Not very many Abrams were ever outright destroyed and those that were or to a lesser degree of damage tended to shield the crews rather famously. I think the legacy of the Abrams is pretty well cemented as being one of the most safe and protected of all the AFVs.
I’m inclined to believe what he says about why the Crocs were so effective; I remember reading about our equivalent, the “Zippo” (pretty much a Sherman with the cannon swapped out for a flamethrower) and how, in the Pacific theatre, Zippos were pretty much the only way to clear Japanese bunkers without having to send in the infantry to dig them out. Iron resolve and sense of duty are powerful things, yes, but the threat of being burned alive is something *nobody* is going to ignore.
Also you don't need to hit a target to kill them with flames. You are burning the oxygen out of the air and potentially causing damage to their lungs, suffocation is a horrible way to go. I know I'd surrender.
We were once carrying a 4 ton machine on a trailer hooked up to a pickup truck. The trailer had no brakes much like the one in this episode. While going downhill at about 10-15Km/h, the sheer weight of the trailer completely nullified the braking power of the truck, and the steering capacity on the front axle thus forcing us off the road and inevitably onto a tree where we came to a full stop!!! I therefore understand how menacing it was for the Lorrie drivers who carried this 6 ton (empty) trailer.
Awesome video and Master Fletcher is a True Gentleman! Actually met him at Bovington and had a damn good chat that extended half an hour after closing time. Total Respect.
My Great Uncle Bernard Price was a Crocodile driver with 1st Fife & Forfar Yeomanry and said the universal joint coupling between the tank and trailer was one of the most amazing and unsung pieces of engineering during the war as it never ever failed regardless of the strain and abuse it was exposed to during combat.
One thing I recall reading about the crocodile was regarding the tactic Mr. Fletcher speaks of here, to douse the target in the fuel first. They found that more often than not being soaked in petrol and to see it spilling in like a ship awash in a storm would coax even the most stubborn troops out of the most impenetrable positions. As he says, fire is a terrifying weapon and despite all the horrors posed by war, being burned alive seemed to rank as the number 1 worst way to go. it's quite understandable how the Crocodile was so effective. Being immensely well armoured from the front, possessing the ability to use it's main armament like other tanks, and also having the range to sit quite comfortably out of range of most infantry anti-tank weapons must have made it incredibly fearsome. Untouchable, unstoppable, and yet threatening to make your exit from the stage a live cremation. I'd surrender too!
I was crew member on a river boat in Nam. We had an Army APC (Armored Personnel Carrier) that would back up into our well deck during operations. It had tanks of Napalm and gasoline which we would use against enemy spider trenches. Our boat was hated because of this weapon. So much so, that the enemy would focus all their on weapons on us. It was a terrible weapon. I didn’t feel good about using it. Those memories still visit me today...
Chap who used to fix our hoover back in the 70's was in Croc's in Italy, think he said he had been up as far as the Po. Told me tricks they used to do like bouncing the jet off walls to get the flame around corners.
My father served with the 141 RAC I have a copy of a book, The Playboys, an unofficial biography of the journey from France to the end. He is mentioned by name it it Trooper Wear.
My Grandad was a Tank driver with the playboys,didn’t say much about the war he was ashamed of what he did and saw as a result of the view from the driving position.( I can only imagine) . Not sure if he maybe mentioned in the book his name was Trooper Cooper.He never collected his medals or caught up with any of his comrades which is really sad. I’m just trying to gather any information out there that may help me understand and record his military history.
@@tonydarcy5042 Hi had a quick look. There is a roll of honour listing wounded and killed. I only know of my father because he told me and showed me where he is mentioned.
@@tonydarcy5042 makes me think of my late father-in-law. He was a coal miner before the war. After it was over, he wouldnt talk about what he had seen either. He wanted to put something back and went into nursing.
David Fletcher is to the United Kingdom, what R. Lee Ermey was to the United States! Of course RIP Gunny, you will be sorely missed..... Though, they didn't travel down the same paths in life. They both are legendary in their own rights!
I wish David Fletcher was my grandfather. He could tell me all stuff about tanks and I could return the favor by feeding him tasty pies and ale. heh heh. Edit...Who the hell could dislike a video with him in? There are some bloody wierdos about thats for sure.
I love these videos. I read somewhere that Crocodiles used to work in tandem with Churchill AVREs, which would blow in the wall of a fortification with its gun for the Croc's flamethrower to exploit. They'd roll up and often the mere sight of these monsters caused surrender.
Another excellent video from Mr Fletcher. He goes into greater detail in his book British Battle Tanks, accompanied with his usual dry humour, worth a read.
The flamethower probably saved more lives then it took. Although, I do understand anyone disagreeing, the prospect of being a human match is not at all enticing.
LazyLife IFreak - psych effect varied enormously. Original doctrine was to dash into "effective" range quick as possible (12mph?) for shock effect but that didn't get defenders to surrender and cost crocs and crews. Firing off a few rods from a long way off then sauntering up with inf alongside got 90% to run or surrender.
Carbon dioxide poisoning was the main cause of death during a flamethrower attack, The US Marines would find dead Japanese soldiers apparently unharmed in bunkers and caves and no sign of suicide.
My great uncle was one of the inventor's on this flamethrower Reginald Fraser passed away in 1966. My great uncle was a great inventor and for his work on this he received the British Order from Queen Elizabeth's father. It would be nice if they would speak more of the people including my great uncle and giving honor to them and their smarts for building this.
David Fletcher has a book detailing the development of the Churchill Crocodile and credits Reginald's drawings of the concept within this. You may wish to have a read. It's called; 'Churchill Crocodile Flamethrower'.
@@thetankmuseumes, I read the book and where I saw my great uncle marginally mentioned. My great uncle was a very intelligent man who wrote over 800 scientific papers and in over 80 pattens to his name. From what I learned of him he was a very humble man and so there was not a whole lot written on him and or photos of him displayed. It would be nice if he would be recognized more for his endeavors such as his close work with Mr. Churchill.
Flecther is awesome. Could sit around just letting him pass on his knowledge forever. Thx for these videos so interesting. Chieftain and Flecther are so interesting to listen to.
i think they have a croc at the regiments museum in calgary but they didn't have the trailer its interesting to see the whole system together like this
Listened to the accounts of germans on D-day and they were frightened to death of the flame throwing tanks. It had quite a Psychological effect on them. This particular soldiers account was horrific and yes his men turned and ran. Many without their weapons. It was all about running away as fast as you could. They thought they were up against a regular Churchill when it first appeared.
(13:39) Not just being burned by flame, but the guarantee that any oxygen in the fortified position would be burned off, resulting in suffocation if not also being directly burned. The fumes weren't healthy, either.
Should review archive footage of these preparing for action showing gas cylinders in banks on the right hand side being renewed. So not the only version as the Tank Museum would have you believe. The "jellied petrol" was the forerunner of napalm that the Americans loved to use in Vietnam.
The US military in the Pacific used M3 Stewart fixed with the Zippo flamethrower and if I remember correctly the Zippo flamethrower was a Canadian invention
Captured flame crews from both sides supposedly got a quite hot reception on occasion, especially from those lately on the receiving end of their work. Summary executions were said to have occurred but whether they were real or rumours is not very clear.
My grandfather was in A squadron 141st R.A.C. ( the Buffs) the crews were executed if captured, they went across on D-Day + 3 to support the Canadians on the Juno beachhead against 12th S.S. there were lots allied prisoners being shot by the S.S., but flame units & snipers were normally always shot on capture. One croc tank crew was captured the by the S.S. had all its crew killed bar the youngest of crew who found by the same Squadron of Crocs near Lingen in 1945 in a work group. The crews knew surrender was out of question after that. They also had loud speakers with them so after a warning shot the Germans had the option of surrender. My grandfather was awarded the Military medal for decoupling his tanks trailer under fire, when the tank behind got hit by a panzerfaust, causing the flame gunner to flame his tank by mistake in a close assault. They saw nearly constant action & operated with every nationality of the allies on the western front after D-Day, from what I have read tho no where near as brutal as the Eastern Front, there was no love lost between the S.S. & the different allied units they fought until even they knew Germany has lost the war.
He is passionate about the subject, that is why he is so very good. BTW I like the emblem on the tank, an armoured fist holding a damn great mace covered in spikes.
Love the informative detail in these. Long may the tank chats series continue. Every time I see one it makes me want to make another trip to Bovington.
Top class video about a terrible weapon system. Somehow being burned seems to be worse than slowly crushed under a tanks tracks. It's easy to be enthralled by the technology but people sometimes forget that a soldiers job is to locate, close with and kill the enemy.
Very informative..... They were very cunning when it came to specialised tanks, during WW2... I think it's also a bit sad because they were specialised to do one particular thing, a lot less have been produced and therefor, less of these tanks even survived..
So you're suggesting flinging tea bags at the Jerries in the hopes that they would recognize a British regiment and surrender on the spot. And now I am just imagining a Churchill crocodile that instead of spitting flame, fired boiling hot tea...
Did you have to go outside of the tank to turn on the nitrogen to power the flamethrower? With the system that was used in the Pacific on the m-3 they had the valve to turn on the CO2 to power the fluid into the flamethrower discharge nozzle with inside of the actual tank. We used to call them the Zippo tank.
binaway Bit of a generic claim, some troops undoubtably killed flame thrower crews after they had been flamed, but it was a common weapon to all forces in WW2, both man portable and vehicle mounted. Its common for people to claim "Hitler ordered it" or the "German OKW" or local commanders or common for all frontline troops - but its a claim with no real substance " just everyone knows"
Using a Crocodile flame-thrower on a fortified position might be one thing, like a Crocodile trundles up to a pill box spurting flame and all the Germans run out and surrender. Using it in the bocage might be another thing. There the Germans would be hiding in the trees and hedges and it's not so easy to surrender in the middle of battle, I'd imagine, with all the bullets and shells flying about. Still, plenty of tank crew burnt to death when their tanks brewed up after being hit by a panzerfaust for example, so it doesn't pay to get too squeamish I suppose.
Mr. Fletcher's mustache alone could stop that flamethrower.
The flame would stop in the air out of pure respect to Mr. Fletscher.
I couldn't take my eyes off of it. Definitely a psychological weapon if there ever was one! ;) :P (I hope he takes all of this in stride. All in good fun, sir!) :)
He reminds me of Dr Zoidberg (Dr John A.Zoidberg) from Futurama.
It's very hard to get it to stay still for a photo shoot - the best way is to put some food down for it, with the camera already set up for the shot. Bit like a David Attenborough programme.
You know Chuck Norris would bow and ask permission to wear his moustache, the tash the legend.
"That really burned like a...well it WAS a house on fire". Perfect.
+Lancaster50 to soon.
OK deleted
I howled at that. I had to go back and rewatch about 30 seconds that I missed crying laughing. Brilliant!
About 8.29 onwards - just after the 'wet strike' section.
Don't forget the follow-up. "if it went the right way." :D
Fletcher is an absolute Legend
The Iron Armenian aka G.I. Haigs what if the enemy fired the tank
+tiger cat
Then the tank would have to find another job, or a Sugar Mommy.....but with those looks..... better start scouring through the job ads.
I can't agree with you more. Nice video on tanks you might not have heard of I really enjoyed it
What an absolute goon
The Jonny Morris of tanks. Great Guy.
This is why Fletcher makes these videos really great. "There used to be a door here, but it fell off ages ago. And we lost it".
"...and 7th was actually the old 10th which had been renamed 7th because the original 7th had disappeared…"
He has such a wonderfully archaic vocabulary (and I mean that in a good way). His choice of words is straight out of a 1930s Evelyn Waugh novel or a Biggles book.
9p
@@AudieHolland - disappeared is a euphemism I suppose for annihilated.
@@dobiem1 Thank you dobiem1, I knew that. I just repeated it because I like it so much.
I just love British understatement. Mr Fletcher just said the fact that the fuel would stick to whatever it hit was "jolly handy".
THe never used the N word,,, Napalm thats it.
@ricardo soto
That's because napalm is a specific chemical mixture lol, you can get the same results in different ways. Was it actually napalm?
@@ricardosoto5770Jellied petroleum?
The amount of knowledge David Fletcher has is incredible.
silverflashwillo123 flamethrower are against Geneve convention
Well, yes and no.
From the little research i made, it seems to be that flamethrowers (and other incendiary weapons) are not allowed to be used against civilians. Otherwise it's fine to use flamethrowers.
@@tigercat418 Flamethrowers aren't banned by the Geneva Convention.
You're definitely allowed to use them in fighting against hardened targets like bunkers or cave/tunnel systems. Or to remove plant cover if the enemy is using it to hide.
They are however mentioned in the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. Which bans their use against civilian targets.
I sometimes watch these just to see how David is holding up. Living treasure of a man.
as an active abrams gunner, it is humbling to listen to David Fletcher
I wonder if 50-60 years from now ex-Abrams operators will be complaining about how it was a death trap the way Sherman operators did with it (despite statistically low casualties overall)
@@discipleofdagon8195 I highly doubt it. Not very many Abrams were ever outright destroyed and those that were or to a lesser degree of damage tended to shield the crews rather famously. I think the legacy of the Abrams is pretty well cemented as being one of the most safe and protected of all the AFVs.
Yes quite, “people didn’t like the idea of being burned”, which sort of made them quite a handy thing really! Jolly good show old chap!
I’m inclined to believe what he says about why the Crocs were so effective; I remember reading about our equivalent, the “Zippo” (pretty much a Sherman with the cannon swapped out for a flamethrower) and how, in the Pacific theatre, Zippos were pretty much the only way to clear Japanese bunkers without having to send in the infantry to dig them out. Iron resolve and sense of duty are powerful things, yes, but the threat of being burned alive is something *nobody* is going to ignore.
Also you don't need to hit a target to kill them with flames. You are burning the oxygen out of the air and potentially causing damage to their lungs, suffocation is a horrible way to go. I know I'd surrender.
"...because people didn't like getting burned"
Yeah, I kinda imagine :)
" They didn't plan to use them in Burma. They had visions of the Trailer being a flaming Nuisance '" Another gold assessment from David Fletcher MBA
We were once carrying a 4 ton machine on a trailer hooked up to a pickup truck.
The trailer had no brakes much like the one in this episode.
While going downhill at about 10-15Km/h, the sheer weight of the trailer completely nullified the braking power of the truck, and the steering capacity on the front axle thus forcing us off the road and inevitably onto a tree where we came to a full stop!!!
I therefore understand how menacing it was for the Lorrie drivers who carried this 6 ton (empty) trailer.
And that is why you don't tow loads that weigh more than your tow vehicle!
(Been there myself, more than once)
I've tried driving like that in BeamNG, yeah it is pretty scary
Awesome video and Master Fletcher is a True Gentleman! Actually met him at Bovington and had a damn good chat that extended half an hour after closing time. Total Respect.
Underneath fletcher's mustache is another mustache...
#itsbiggerontheinside
Its a fractal.
Everybody keeps missing the eyebrows. They, alone, could be used like a mine flail.
Yes! Seems we've been good little boys this week so we get treated to a tank chat from mr. Fletcher.
My Great Uncle Bernard Price was a Crocodile driver with 1st Fife & Forfar Yeomanry and said the universal joint coupling between the tank and trailer was one of the most amazing and unsung pieces of engineering during the war as it never ever failed regardless of the strain and abuse it was exposed to during combat.
I have no idea what I enjoy most, the tanks or Mr. Fletcher’s voice !
"...Therefore we're gonna talk more about the trailer than the tank, which I suppose is okay in the end."
Well played.
Fletcher is the grandfather we all wish we had
Tufted Titmouse Never had the chance to know my grandfathers, but I sure hope they were as knowledgeable or interesting as Mr Fletcher.
One of my grandfathers was a driver for a Crocodile lol.
One thing I recall reading about the crocodile was regarding the tactic Mr. Fletcher speaks of here, to douse the target in the fuel first. They found that more often than not being soaked in petrol and to see it spilling in like a ship awash in a storm would coax even the most stubborn troops out of the most impenetrable positions. As he says, fire is a terrifying weapon and despite all the horrors posed by war, being burned alive seemed to rank as the number 1 worst way to go.
it's quite understandable how the Crocodile was so effective. Being immensely well armoured from the front, possessing the ability to use it's main armament like other tanks, and also having the range to sit quite comfortably out of range of most infantry anti-tank weapons must have made it incredibly fearsome. Untouchable, unstoppable, and yet threatening to make your exit from the stage a live cremation. I'd surrender too!
Fletcherisms are priceless, absolutely priceless. God Save David Fletcher!
I bet no one ever dared pull out a cigarette and ask a Churchill Crocodile crew member
"Have you got a light please mate?"
It would be great to have a tour around the museum with David Fletcher guiding you and giving a talk on the tanks as you go past
Probably would take at least a week.
I was crew member on a river boat in Nam. We had an Army APC (Armored Personnel Carrier) that would back up into our well deck during operations. It had tanks of Napalm and gasoline which we would use against enemy spider trenches. Our boat was hated because of this weapon. So much so, that the enemy would focus all their on weapons on us. It was a terrible weapon. I didn’t feel good about using it. Those memories still visit me today...
I love this tank.
One of the best (or even the best) friend/foe ratio casualties especialy captives from trenches and bunkers.
4:48 "Flaming regiments in their own right" And now all I can think of is the Monty Python army "Camp it... UP!" sketch
Never ever say something when Fletcher is speaking such a legend deserves to speak for every second
Chap who used to fix our hoover back in the 70's was in Croc's in Italy, think he said he had been up as far as the Po. Told me tricks they used to do like bouncing the jet off walls to get the flame around corners.
My father served with the 141 RAC I have a copy of a book, The Playboys, an unofficial biography of the journey from France to the end. He is mentioned by name it it Trooper Wear.
My Grandad was a Tank driver with the playboys,didn’t say much about the war he was ashamed of what he did and saw as a result of the view from the driving position.( I can only imagine) . Not sure if he maybe mentioned in the book his name was Trooper Cooper.He never collected his medals or caught up with any of his comrades which is really sad. I’m just trying to gather any information out there that may help me understand and record his military history.
@@tonydarcy5042 Hi had a quick look. There is a roll of honour listing wounded and killed. I only know of my father because he told me and showed me where he is mentioned.
@@michaelwear2252 thanks ,I very much just ordered a copy for posterity and hopefully open my eyes to what he endured.
@@tonydarcy5042 makes me think of my late father-in-law. He was a coal miner before the war. After it was over, he wouldnt talk about what he had seen either. He wanted to put something back and went into nursing.
I'm always excited to see another Tank Chat!
Finally, a 15 minute video from Sir David. Maybe a 20 minute video in our future?
Fletcher's turn of phrase is wonderful. He's a joy to listen to.
David Fletcher is to the United Kingdom, what R. Lee Ermey was to the United States! Of course RIP Gunny, you will be sorely missed..... Though, they didn't travel down the same paths in life. They both are legendary in their own rights!
Can you imagine the two...Understatement meets overstatement..in a good way..
I wish David Fletcher was my grandfather. He could tell me all stuff about tanks and I could return the favor by feeding him tasty pies and ale. heh heh. Edit...Who the hell could dislike a video with him in? There are some bloody wierdos about thats for sure.
6 dislikes is pretty low for RUclips. Probably just angry hippies.
Frank Dyke “angry hippies” ???
Lol what is that even
Frank Dyke
Angry Hippies who can't grow a mustache like him.
Well, if he was my grandfather, possibly I could have used his handy stuff tips ! Well, other times.
"...but the drivers got used to it and in the end, you had to do it." I could listen to David Fletcher for hours
David is fabulous!
Cheer`s Mr. Fletcher!
I love these videos. I read somewhere that Crocodiles used to work in tandem with Churchill AVREs, which would blow in the wall of a fortification with its gun for the Croc's flamethrower to exploit. They'd roll up and often the mere sight of these monsters caused surrender.
Yo David Fletcher lookin fly af 😤💪💪
Brb growing a mustache
Another excellent video from Mr Fletcher. He goes into greater detail in his book British Battle Tanks, accompanied with his usual dry humour, worth a read.
The flamethower probably saved more lives then it took.
Although, I do understand anyone disagreeing, the prospect of being a human match is not at all enticing.
LazyLife IFreak - psych effect varied enormously. Original doctrine was to dash into "effective" range quick as possible (12mph?) for shock effect but that didn't get defenders to surrender and cost crocs and crews. Firing off a few rods from a long way off then sauntering up with inf alongside got 90% to run or surrender.
Carbon dioxide poisoning was the main cause of death during a flamethrower attack, The US Marines would find dead Japanese soldiers apparently unharmed in bunkers and caves and no sign of suicide.
Unless you've killed everyone, victory comes ultimately from destroying the enemy's will to fight, and flamethrowers do that brilliantly.
@@FrankDyke -if handled well.👍
War is about killing. The how of it seems secondary to me.
It burned like a house on fire . Well it was a house on fire 😁
This was "one of the most lethal bits of kit". Priceless.
Some say he doesn't actually have a mouth, and that his entire house is made of tweed.
All we know is, he's called the Fletcher.
On today's episode of Bovington Gear
Another great video. It's truly an honour to hear Mr. Fletcher talk at length. Cheers from Canada 😊
"There should be a door here but it fell off ages ago and nobody knows where it is now."
I could listen to this wonderful man talk about tanks all day.
Jolly handy at clearing woods that sentence is why this man is so watchable in a nutshell
My great uncle was one of the inventor's on this flamethrower Reginald Fraser passed away in 1966. My great uncle was a great inventor and for his work on this he received the British Order from Queen Elizabeth's father. It would be nice if they would speak more of the people including my great uncle and giving honor to them and their smarts for building this.
David Fletcher has a book detailing the development of the Churchill Crocodile and credits Reginald's drawings of the concept within this. You may wish to have a read. It's called; 'Churchill Crocodile Flamethrower'.
@@thetankmuseumes, I read the book and where I saw my great uncle marginally mentioned. My great uncle was a very intelligent man who wrote over 800 scientific papers and in over 80 pattens to his name. From what I learned of him he was a very humble man and so there was not a whole lot written on him and or photos of him displayed. It would be nice if he would be recognized more for his endeavors such as his close work with Mr. Churchill.
Engineers are almost never acknowledged. Your great uncle is not somehow specially ignored.
Mr. Fletcher, you are a national treasure.
Flecther is awesome. Could sit around just letting him pass on his knowledge forever. Thx for these videos so interesting. Chieftain and Flecther are so interesting to listen to.
i think they have a croc at the regiments museum in calgary but they didn't have the trailer its interesting to see the whole system together like this
I really love this man.
Read "Flamethrower" by Andrew Wilson. He was a Crocodile commander in NW Europe.
"Otherwise they'd be misused" ...you don't say? Lol
14:18 "They had visions of the trailer being a flaming nuisance"
No pun intended..
Another Tank chat...hooray!
Thanks for the information tank Einstein 😄
Mr. Fletcher seems like an absolute joy to speak to.
always like to hear Mr Fletcher talking about tanks, i wonder if there is anything he does not know about tanks
Yes, he does not know where that bloody trailer hatch door has got to ;)
Ah but he did not take it off, he cant read minds, im sure if he had anything to do with the door he would know where it was, :=)
Listened to the accounts of germans on D-day and they were frightened to death of the flame throwing tanks. It had quite a Psychological effect on them. This particular soldiers account was horrific and yes his men turned and ran. Many without their weapons. It was all about running away as fast as you could. They thought they were up against a regular Churchill when it first appeared.
Thanks, I'm painting a tamiya crocodile model and this video has really helped
(13:39) Not just being burned by flame, but the guarantee that any oxygen in the fortified position would be burned off, resulting in suffocation if not also being directly burned. The fumes weren't healthy, either.
Should review archive footage of these preparing for action showing gas cylinders in banks on the right hand side being renewed. So not the only version as the Tank Museum would have you believe. The "jellied petrol" was the forerunner of napalm that the Americans loved to use in Vietnam.
The US military in the Pacific used M3 Stewart fixed with the Zippo flamethrower and if I remember correctly the Zippo flamethrower was a Canadian invention
Captured flame crews from both sides supposedly got a quite hot reception on occasion, especially from those lately on the receiving end of their work. Summary executions were said to have occurred but whether they were real or rumours is not very clear.
My grandfather was in A squadron 141st R.A.C. ( the Buffs) the crews were executed if captured, they went across on D-Day + 3 to support the Canadians on the Juno beachhead against 12th S.S.
there were lots allied prisoners being shot by the S.S., but flame units & snipers were normally always shot on capture.
One croc tank crew was captured the by the S.S. had all its crew killed bar the youngest of crew who found by the same Squadron of Crocs near Lingen in 1945 in a work group.
The crews knew surrender was out of question after that.
They also had loud speakers with them so after a warning shot the Germans had the option of surrender.
My grandfather was awarded the Military medal for decoupling his tanks trailer under fire, when the tank behind got hit by a panzerfaust, causing the flame gunner to flame his tank by mistake in a close assault.
They saw nearly constant action & operated with every nationality of the allies on the western front after D-Day, from what I have read tho no where near as brutal as the Eastern Front, there was no love lost between the S.S. & the different allied units they fought until even they knew Germany has lost the war.
He is passionate about the subject, that is why he is so very good. BTW I like the emblem on the tank, an armoured fist holding a damn great mace covered in spikes.
79th Armoured Division. ‘Hobart’s Funnies’.
Love the informative detail in these. Long may the tank chats series continue. Every time I see one it makes me want to make another trip to Bovington.
The man, the mustache, the legend...
Thank you for this presentation Mr. Fletcher.
flaming nuisance. lol.
This guy makes me want to go to Bovington tank museum. Real nice presentation and a wealth of knowledge 👍👍
I just come back only to listen to this awesome gentleman !
Top class video about a terrible weapon system. Somehow being burned seems to be worse than slowly crushed under a tanks tracks. It's easy to be enthralled by the technology but people sometimes forget that a soldiers job is to locate, close with and kill the enemy.
Apparently "people didn't like the idea of being burnt"
Very informative..... They were very cunning when it came to specialised tanks, during WW2... I think it's also a bit sad because they were specialised to do one particular thing, a lot less have been produced and therefor, less of these tanks even survived..
the door fell off ages ago and nobody know where it is Brilliant !!!!!!
Excellent as ever
In the Pacific they use the M3 Stewart tank equipped with the Canadian Zippo flamethrower.
So informative, thank you! I always wondered about the operational use of these beasts. Wouldn't want to be anywhere near one!
Should write a book only of “Fletcherism”
Tank Einstein is very entertaining
Now that is good content, with excellent delivery and humor!
More German's surrendered to the Crocodile then was killed by the Crocodile
Stephen Warhurst - more Germans surrendered to Brit inf than were killed by them too.
What?! They surrendered and then were killed?? That's horrific! (jk)
AlichinoGaming 😂 typo?
So you're suggesting flinging tea bags at the Jerries in the hopes that they would recognize a British regiment and surrender on the spot.
And now I am just imagining a Churchill crocodile that instead of spitting flame, fired boiling hot tea...
Yeah ;)
5:40
"otherwise they would be misused."
For making BBQ? 😃
Did you have to go outside of the tank to turn on the nitrogen to power the flamethrower? With the system that was used in the Pacific on the m-3 they had the valve to turn on the CO2 to power the fluid into the flamethrower discharge nozzle with inside of the actual tank. We used to call them the Zippo tank.
**Crocodile go Fwooooooosh**
Thanks David. We use this "Sticky fuel" to light brush piles from a helicopter.
This guy is *funny*! LOL'ed at "fuel dripping out the end, which wasn't the idea at all"; I imagine not =]
Nice tank chat this is quite funny as I made a video on the crocodile a few days ago. Bovington is my favourite museum and got me interested in tanks
They weren’t use in Burma as they thought the trailer would be a “flaming nuisance “.......priceless🤩
With all that knowledge I would imagine David is a “Jolly Handy” guy to have at the tank museum:-)
I'm sure most already know that few flame thrower operators were rarely taken as prisoner. If captured they were immediately killed.
binaway Bit of a generic claim, some troops undoubtably killed flame thrower crews after they had been flamed, but it was a common weapon to all forces in WW2, both man portable and vehicle mounted. Its common for people to claim "Hitler ordered it" or the "German OKW" or local commanders or common for all frontline troops - but its a claim with no real substance " just everyone knows"
How come?
Fantastic video lads, keep it up.
Fletch is a master historian bring him back
Could listen to this chap talk all day they should set him up with a chair and just let him chat
Using a Crocodile flame-thrower on a fortified position might be one thing, like a Crocodile trundles up to a pill box spurting flame and all the Germans run out and surrender. Using it in the bocage might be another thing. There the Germans would be hiding in the trees and hedges and it's not so easy to surrender in the middle of battle, I'd imagine, with all the bullets and shells flying about. Still, plenty of tank crew burnt to death when their tanks brewed up after being hit by a panzerfaust for example, so it doesn't pay to get too squeamish I suppose.
ONE QUESTION, if i may! - ...WHY would you prefer an "INTERNAL FUEL" tank for the flamethrower, rather than an EXTERNAL "behind-trolley"??
I’d love to have the title “operator of the flame”
"Aiden Look, Operator of Flame"