Thank you very much for uploading this record rarity! and also for all the useful info in the description. Is the recording on the other side "Bayrischer Defilier-Marsch"?
Thanks for the upload! 🤝 But I'm afraid it's actually not a Fuhsel's recording. I've never seen Viktoria 4053 label, thanks for the photo too. And although the label indicates that the performer is Fuhsel, in fact the march is performed by a certain symphony orchestra (you can easily hear strings on the recording). This very recording was also released on Hakenkreuz-Platte 2032 (with a proper performer credit as Symphonieorchester). You can find Fuhsel's recording of Badenweiler-Marsch (released on Hakenkreuz-Platte 2037) online and make sure that it sounds completely different.
Thanks for the Comment. According to the recording books and the MX-No.-Lists by Lotz, Fuhsel had 3 different recording Sessions for "Badenweiler Marsch", all 3 were released on Brillant Special and on both NS-Schallplattenindustrie-Labels (Victoria and Hakenkreuzplatte), the Issues on "Victoria" are the late ones after the so called "Kitschparagraph" in late 1933 which made it illegal to use the Swastika on products without the Parties permission. Fuhsel recorded for Stahmann in 3 different Orchestra sizes, the Lists on Rainer Lotz's Website might be very interesting for you.
After another listening, I think you are right, it sounds different compared to the Fuhsel's recording. To be completely sure, it should be checked if the matrix printed on the shellac itself is "To 110", in this case it is indeed the Symphonieorchester.
@@orag-konigsbergerrundfunk5220 Thanks, I'm familiar with Rainer Lotz's website and lists, they are quite helpful. However, I'm afraid you're wrong. There is not a word in Mr. Lotz's lists about three recordings of this march by Fuhsel's band. Fuhsel recorded Badenweiler-Marsch for NSSI in 1933 (mx number Tono 2057). It was released on Hakenkreuz-Platte 2037, Brillant-Special 212 and Tempo 725. There was also another recording of this march for NSSI by an unknown symphony orchestra (mx number To 110, according to Mr. Lotz) released on Hakenkreuz-Platte 2032. I've heard this particular recording and it's the same as yours. In addition, Hakenkreuz-Platte recordings were quite often re-released on the Viktoria label with the replacement of the 20... catalog number with 40... - as happened with this particular record. Unfortunately, Mr. Lotz didn't specify the performer of Badenweiler-Marsch from Hakenkreuz-Platte 2053, it would be interesting to check what is written on the label. There is nothing unusual in multiple releases of the same record on different labels. As well as there is nothing unusual in errors on the labels of the records.
Klasse 🥰😀👍 Vielen Dank für's Hochladen 🙋♀️
Hallo ORAG, eine sehr schöne Aufnahme und ganz interessante Information zu dem Video. Gerne mehr.
Danke für deine Arbeit. 👍🏻🤚🏻👋🏻😀
Vielen Dank!!😌
Wunderbare ton und klang trotz den hohen alter ,ich liebe den Badenweiler Marsch😏
Thank you very much for uploading this record rarity! and also for all the useful info in the description.
Is the recording on the other side "Bayrischer Defilier-Marsch"?
Thanks for the upload! 🤝 But I'm afraid it's actually not a Fuhsel's recording. I've never seen Viktoria 4053 label, thanks for the photo too. And although the label indicates that the performer is Fuhsel, in fact the march is performed by a certain symphony orchestra (you can easily hear strings on the recording). This very recording was also released on Hakenkreuz-Platte 2032 (with a proper performer credit as Symphonieorchester). You can find Fuhsel's recording of Badenweiler-Marsch (released on Hakenkreuz-Platte 2037) online and make sure that it sounds completely different.
Thanks for the Comment. According to the recording books and the MX-No.-Lists by Lotz, Fuhsel had 3 different recording Sessions for "Badenweiler Marsch", all 3 were released on Brillant Special and on both NS-Schallplattenindustrie-Labels (Victoria and Hakenkreuzplatte), the Issues on "Victoria" are the late ones after the so called "Kitschparagraph" in late 1933 which made it illegal to use the Swastika on products without the Parties permission.
Fuhsel recorded for Stahmann in 3 different Orchestra sizes, the Lists on Rainer Lotz's Website might be very interesting for you.
After another listening, I think you are right, it sounds different compared to the Fuhsel's recording.
To be completely sure, it should be checked if the matrix printed on the shellac itself is "To 110", in this case it is indeed the Symphonieorchester.
@@orag-konigsbergerrundfunk5220 Thanks, I'm familiar with Rainer Lotz's website and lists, they are quite helpful. However, I'm afraid you're wrong. There is not a word in Mr. Lotz's lists about three recordings of this march by Fuhsel's band.
Fuhsel recorded Badenweiler-Marsch for NSSI in 1933 (mx number Tono 2057). It was released on Hakenkreuz-Platte 2037, Brillant-Special 212 and Tempo 725. There was also another recording of this march for NSSI by an unknown symphony orchestra (mx number To 110, according to Mr. Lotz) released on Hakenkreuz-Platte 2032. I've heard this particular recording and it's the same as yours. In addition, Hakenkreuz-Platte recordings were quite often re-released on the Viktoria label with the replacement of the 20... catalog number with 40... - as happened with this particular record. Unfortunately, Mr. Lotz didn't specify the performer of Badenweiler-Marsch from Hakenkreuz-Platte 2053, it would be interesting to check what is written on the label.
There is nothing unusual in multiple releases of the same record on different labels. As well as there is nothing unusual in errors on the labels of the records.
Was ist auf der anderen Seite ?
🤚🏻
🖤🤍❤️