At first, I was against it. But after thinking about it, I think it's a good idea. Every year, you have the schools ranked 5-10 complain about how they should be in the playoffs. This will give them the opportunity to show if they are deserving or not. If they lose, then they need to STFU. As far as people saying its about money...Yes, it's about money. All sports are, duh!
@@GooniesNeverSayDie1980 that may be true. But for me, I just get tired of the 5-10 and undefeated teams complain when they don't get in the playoffs. Put more teams in, and let them bite their own foot if they lose. Also, I like to see upsets as well. And any given game, anyone can win. But you're right about Rob, he flip flop so much, he should be at a beach.
It’s all about the opportunity to see upsets! That’s why we like NCAA March Madness. We know the small schools aren’t going to win the whole thing but we want to see them upset a few of the big dogs.
i agree to an extent. but UC vs alabama last year kinda ruined any vision of that. UC was the best “small team” we’ve ever seen. bama was weaker than they normally are. & bama absolutely dominated them
@@stingrey1571 you're not going to see "March Madness" type upsets in college football the talent gap is far too wide. The small schools will get demolished, no one wants to waste time including them in a playoff
Rob makes no sense,the playoffs would give more reasons too keep good players playing if they have a chance to win a chip rather than a Outback bloomin onion bowl
@@mistahozzy he's not saying it isn't a money grab. He's saying Rob Parker is being a hypocrite (as usual) by selling $8 rubber wristbands himself which is a money grab but has a problem with college football being a money grab. 💰
@@whosCoel you can’t compare an a 8 dollar wristband to a multibillion dollar business lmao. It’s actually comical you’re trying to make the comparison.
@@mistahozzy college isn’t gonna let 450 million dollars go buy cause it’s less entertaining games. If your a business man would you? It’s not really an argument other than quality of games which most will watch anyways.
This is how you get more schools on that level no one goes anywhere else because only 4 teams have a real chance no need to name them but if more teams have a chance and with nil the talent will start to spread
@@jaquayvermillion4524 agreed while also keeping fanbases interested the entire season versus checking out after a loss or 2. Ppl act like upsets wouldnt happen.
remember when boise st beat oklahoma? that boise team could of went on a cinderella like run if there were a playoff back then. that is why expansion is a great idea.
This is the best thing for college football and the players. I dont see how anyone could disagree with this. As it stands, some teams no matter how well they do they will never get a shot at the title. This new playoff system actually gives these colleges a shot. It gives us more games, more competition and to see who truly is the greatest team that year. Amazing change!
If they're gonna do it regardless, then just start with 6, Maybe 8 teams and see how it plays out. But 12 is just blatant greed with NO regard for the Athletes, especially the ones tryna father their professional careers
This was a long time coming and it needed to happen. The college football rankings have become nothing more than popularity contest. You have to give other teams a chance to win a national championship. Not always go by popularity of programs. It's not just about the money. It's about fairness as well. You can't just continue to go off for teams. The same four teams every single year based upon popularity and based upon lackluster performances
You see what just happened to Oregon we just gonna see a whole lot of that maybe usc will make a comeback but damn that was embarrassing but other programs might do better who knows with nil and the transfer portal
Nonsense. This playoff COMPLETELY ruined the regular season. Back in the day rivalry games meant something. If you were a 1 loss big 5 team and lost that second game, you were done. Now, all the big 5 teams can basically lose 2 or even 3 games and still get in a playoff. There was no popularity when they followed the computer rankings. The 1-2 national title game was the best, and then watching competitive inter conference bowl games to see what conference was dominant that year was the best. Now it's all B.S.
@@kavellifrancois1794 according to who you? So you want the same 4 to 8 get a shot at a national championship game. Yeah that sounds fair. Well how about the NFL? Does that Just only four teams from each conference and let them do get out in a playoffs? Yeah that don't seem fair now does it
It's all about exposure. If other schools have the opportunity to compete, they will be able to recruit better talent. 2and string guys at schools like Alabama can go be a starter elsewhere
this needed to happen. 85-90% of schools had no shot at a title. No Name U can go undefeated, win every game by 30 and not get ranked in the top 20. mean while, notre dame, bama, texas etc can lose 2-3 games and still be in the mix.
The 12 team format is better than the voting popularity contest we have now. I thought 8 would be perfect, but 12 is better than the current system. Rob's argument on this topic is awful.
Meh, it gives all of the schools and all of the fans who say, "give us a chance", the opportunity to prove it. It also eliminates those automatic show-ins because of names. Same teams are ranked top 4 every year and still get in with one or sometimes 2 losses. Now it won't matter to run the table if you can get one of the 12 slots.
Rob's argument is silly because college football has always been mostly meaningless games. Why would anyone care about Toledo vs Iowa St? And for most of college football history we had these meaningless bowl games . Yet these games still happened so what's the big deal about more playoff games ?
12 teams are a tad bit overkill but still I'm just happy that I don't have to hear anymore complaining from teams that didn't get ranked high enough. They'll have 12 slots, if you ain't good enough, you ain't good enough. There may be more blowouts but at least we'll have definitive, concrete results.
4 teams in the playoffs is lame . You need more teams. It was obvious that eventually there would be an expansion. This idea that no teams have a chance then why even watch college football in the first place because only a handful of teams realistically have a chance of winning a chip
For once I finally agree with Rob Parker. I too hate for a playoff expansion. Not needed especially when there going to accept multiple two/three loss teams. That’s no acceptable
not really if you look at the standing the last several years the top 12 only had 2 losses(except maybe 2-3 had 3 or more losses) and most of CFB is about matchups.
I think it’s interesting timing for playoff expansion considering how NIL and college recruiting is drastically changing the landscape talent won’t be as concentrated at certain schools like it use to be so with top recruits spreading out other programs start to become just little bit more competitive imo Also I think it’s ridiculous so many seasons don’t even have a chance for a natty because even though they win all but 1-2 games a year
WE'VE HAD 9-7/10-6 TEAMS WIN THE SUPERBOWL .. A 6TH SEED WIN THE NBA CHAMPIONSHIP .. 85 WIN ST LOUIS CARDINALS TEAM WIN THE WORLD SERIES .. IT SHOULD BE A 16 TEAM PLAYOFF .. JUST LIKE EVERY LEVEL OF CFB 🏈 .. AND HIGH SCHOOL 🏈 ..
Well that’s different bro , those are all at least still professional athletes, who literal livelihoods are at stake based on performance. It’s one thing when it’s 2 professional teams playing but when if notre dame and Georgia play in the playoffs . Notre dame will Lose that 9.5/10 times
Yea they're doing the bye for the first 4 teams, but I really don't think we need all these teams in a playoff when its always clear that the top few teams are exponentially better than the rest. 8 games would be perfect, Rob is a grandpa so he wants the old system, not BCS, but the one when the national title went to the AP #1 team at the end of the year 🤦🏽♂️
The thing that rob forgets is that if your team loses a single game or two there’s almost no point in watching the season. At least with an expanded playoff it keeps you engaged throughout. If your team gets in there’s a small chance they can make the finals. It’s football,anything can happen in a single game.
Both guys made good points. Rob is right, the expansion from 4 to 12 is pure greed not about legit championship competition. Scaling up to grab more cash. Broussard made my favorite point that every league or sport should follow. Maximize the intensity, intrigue, and importance of every playoff game. The revenue will come from “hi stakes” nature of the games.
I don't watch March madness until it get to the final four. Rob is right, the games are'nt entertaining. I understand it's about money and they want everyone to make some money. But don't try to sell it as entertainment. Wake me up when the #12 ranked team bets the number 1 raked team.
No player in the world is sitting out two games before a championship. Stop the madness Rob. Imagine thinking a team would win if the top players sit out and make a championship
College football has always been about what team pays the most for top players. Follow the money, count the championships. We just saw Georgia crush Oregon. We will see Bama, Georgia, Clemson, Tex A&M and a couple others win every year.
The 12-team playoff is a good idea but, you have to get rid of polls (i.e. beauty contest). You should be rewarded for production and quality. Rank teams based on defensive, offensive and strength of schedule. Give each team points for wins based on the ranking of the team they beat. Top 12 are in. End of story.
Then if they do the college playoffs, how about the Pac 10 play Mountain West, Big 12, Big 10, SEC, ACC and Vice Versa to make things really competitive
I don’t want to see the same teams for generations winning the whole thing … in my life time there has literally been only USC / Miami / Alabama / Georgia / …. For multiple years … Ohio St and Oklahoma haven’t seven won as much …
The difference in 🏀 & 🏈 is in basketball when you are playing a high rank out of level team you can and will get embarrassed but you can complete! In football when the match or ranking level are different you risk injury way more Rob is right on this one!!
I'd rather see 12 teams compete for the chip than a million meaningless bowl games. Making it to the playoff gives real meaning to these programs and kids than some .com bowl no one is going to watch.
6 team playoff, sure - but 12 is not good for the sport. You want the best playing - not "pretty good" schools. Basically there will be a minimum of 2-3 SEC schools every year
People keep saying “the ncaa basketball tournament” as a good thing but I see that as a horrible thing. The College basketball regular season isn’t even watched. The beauty of football is the urgency of every game. Why dilute the regular season games?
College basketball isn’t watched because the best players leave after their freshman season or go straight to the G league without ever playing in college. Back in thr day when players stayed for 3 or 4 years in college, fans got to know the players and the quality of the game was better in my opinion.
@@1979ATL the season still close to as watchable. There’s no urgency within the games. There’s a reason why football is by far more popular than basketball and baseball.
I think they should’ve went to 6. 8 at the MAX.. Utah was #12 last year at 10-4. 4 games lost and they’re supposed to be good enough to win the Natty ? Ole Miss was #11.. i could go on all the way up until (arguably) the top 4-6 who MOST days would lose to Bama, OState, and Clemson but on any GIVEN day COULD beat them as well.. if that makes sense. but after that you’re talking about 25-40 point blowouts. I mean Ohio State did chew Clemson up but i think that was an outlier. Anyway my point is, this is gonna suck for the most part lol.
Rob is trying to out do Skip with the amount of double talk, all over the placeness & backtracking Rob did in this segment & others.😁 Give Skip back his shtick & gimmick Rob.😆 By the way, there were 58 "I'm just saying" from Rob this clip.🤣
They completely went off topic but, it’s still a good discussion. Will we see more, let’s be clear, top prospects sit out games or whole seasons? Are we going to see more Ja’marr Chases and Ed Olivers and less Jaylen Smiths? If I have this bomb sophomore or freshman year, Mel Kiper got me #1 or top 5 on the board, why bother?
Some teams won’t draft a player that does what Rob says. People don’t want quitters. If they start doing that I promise the NFL will pass on them bc that’s a pathetic decision
I love the idea of 12 teams!! It will make which every bowl game those teams face off in. More meaningful. Right now those bowl games right just exhibition games.
You can't complain about the horrible bowl games and say the playoffs don't make sense. Players will go to other school. It will be ok for the first 2 yrs but I think after you will see it fix itself. Everyone wont go to bama once it's a bit wide open. Based off of Rob , if you don't go to bama it's over. Cincy stands no chance last yr
Damn rob really? Sorry there may be an extra boring game or 2 but unless the fields expanded there will always only be a few teams worth a title. This will aid in making more schools relevant so its not the same 4 every damn year
So wht he dont have a problem with the 14 NFL teams? We would think tge wild card teams don't have a chance but history tells us different. We have seen wild card teams win super bowls.
Expanding to 12 teams is horrible. There are already way TOO MANY blowouts in the 4 team format. There have 24 CFP games played & only 6 of them have been decided by 7 points or less. The remaining 18 games have been decided by 10-35 points. With a 12 team format someone is going to get destroyed by 40-50 points.
@@mobrocket Don’t get me wrong I actually love the 4 team format I wish they would stay with the 4 team format what I’m saying is that there’s already too many blowouts with the better option & that is the 4 team format but expanding it to 12 you’re going to get more of these exorbitant blowouts and it’s going to be worse and I don’t care how big a college football fan you are nobody wants to watch a supposed championship contending team get blown out by 40 or 50 points which is what’s going to happen with this 12 team format
@@jamesrippy1161 But for these teams that miss out being #5 let's say .. those schools would love that shot. So what if there are more blow outs, is that any better that bowl games that the 5-12 play that mean nothing to them
Rob disagrees every year with the 4 teams chosen to be in the NCAA Football Playoffs, so just wait, Rob will flip-flop as usual, Rob will want expansion then.😶
Lol there is no playoff system, no matter the sport, where every team has a shot to win it all.
I like the idea of seeing teams that don't usually play match up. And like Chris said, those lower seed teams will be hungry to prove themselves.
pundits will say, "those teams will get blown out." how do we know if they never play and are given a chance.
NCAA FCS has run a playoff system for years, and it has worked out.
At first, I was against it. But after thinking about it, I think it's a good idea. Every year, you have the schools ranked 5-10 complain about how they should be in the playoffs. This will give them the opportunity to show if they are deserving or not. If they lose, then they need to STFU.
As far as people saying its about money...Yes, it's about money. All sports are, duh!
Rob is one of those who always disagrees with the 4 teams chosen, so Rob will flip-flop as usual to wanting playoff expansion then, give it time.
@@GooniesNeverSayDie1980 that may be true. But for me, I just get tired of the 5-10 and undefeated teams complain when they don't get in the playoffs. Put more teams in, and let them bite their own foot if they lose. Also, I like to see upsets as well. And any given game, anyone can win. But you're right about Rob, he flip flop so much, he should be at a beach.
The complaining every year is actually really good for networks and conversation. Taking that out hurts conversation and debate.
Underrated comment. This is absolutely true
It’s all about the opportunity to see upsets! That’s why we like NCAA March Madness. We know the small schools aren’t going to win the whole thing but we want to see them upset a few of the big dogs.
YES!!!! college football is the only sport where 85% of the field has ZERO shot at a title. it is all about name recognition, records are meaningless.
i agree to an extent. but UC vs alabama last year kinda ruined any vision of that. UC was the best “small team” we’ve ever seen. bama was weaker than they normally are. & bama absolutely dominated them
Except football talent matters more, whereas in college basketball the talent is almost even
@@bradenhatton what does UC stand for?
@@stingrey1571 you're not going to see "March Madness" type upsets in college football the talent gap is far too wide. The small schools will get demolished, no one wants to waste time including them in a playoff
Rob makes no sense,the playoffs would give more reasons too keep good players playing if they have a chance to win a chip rather than a Outback bloomin onion bowl
Just wait, Rob's opinion will do an 180, Rob disagrees every year with the 4 teams chosen.
Lol rob saying it’s a money grab when he out here selling 8$ rubber wristbands 😂 “STOP IT!!!!”
You acting as if 12 team playoffs isn’t a money grab. Bama and Georgia running through the whole country
@@mistahozzy he's not saying it isn't a money grab. He's saying Rob Parker is being a hypocrite (as usual) by selling $8 rubber wristbands himself which is a money grab but has a problem with college football being a money grab. 💰
@@whosCoel you can’t compare an a 8 dollar wristband to a multibillion dollar business lmao. It’s actually comical you’re trying to make the comparison.
@@mistahozzy college isn’t gonna let 450 million dollars go buy cause it’s less entertaining games. If your a business man would you? It’s not really an argument other than quality of games which most will watch anyways.
Doesn’t make sense there’s only about 3 good teams a year to be honest
This is how you get more schools on that level no one goes anywhere else because only 4 teams have a real chance no need to name them but if more teams have a chance and with nil the talent will start to spread
@@jaquayvermillion4524 agreed while also keeping fanbases interested the entire season versus checking out after a loss or 2. Ppl act like upsets wouldnt happen.
By your logic last year the Packers and Chiefs should have won the Super Bowl because they were one of the 3 best teams
remember when boise st beat oklahoma? that boise team could of went on a cinderella like run if there were a playoff back then. that is why expansion is a great idea.
But Boise was a good team you don’t have teams like that no more who are actually ranked
Boise state was a top ranked team, they weren’t some un ranked Appalachian state..
This is the best thing for college football and the players. I dont see how anyone could disagree with this. As it stands, some teams no matter how well they do they will never get a shot at the title. This new playoff system actually gives these colleges a shot. It gives us more games, more competition and to see who truly is the greatest team that year. Amazing change!
It’s the worst thing. They ruined college football.
@@JM-qn3tf it’s either going to be a question or an answer. Is there a true National champion? Yes, it’s this team who won. Or: let’s argue.
@@blakeharris58 the regular season is watered down now. Games mean little. Bowl games mean nothing. NIL plus this is the end of college football.
If they're gonna do it regardless, then just start with 6, Maybe 8 teams and see how it plays out. But 12 is just blatant greed with NO regard for the Athletes, especially the ones tryna father their professional careers
This was a long time coming and it needed to happen. The college football rankings have become nothing more than popularity contest. You have to give other teams a chance to win a national championship. Not always go by popularity of programs. It's not just about the money. It's about fairness as well. You can't just continue to go off for teams. The same four teams every single year based upon popularity and based upon lackluster performances
There’s no need for 12 teams. 8 teams is enough. There aren’t 12 good teams that deserve to make the playoffs. Sorry
It’s barely 8 good teams
You see what just happened to Oregon we just gonna see a whole lot of that maybe usc will make a comeback but damn that was embarrassing but other programs might do better who knows with nil and the transfer portal
Nonsense. This playoff COMPLETELY ruined the regular season. Back in the day rivalry games meant something. If you were a 1 loss big 5 team and lost that second game, you were done. Now, all the big 5 teams can basically lose 2 or even 3 games and still get in a playoff.
There was no popularity when they followed the computer rankings. The 1-2 national title game was the best, and then watching competitive inter conference bowl games to see what conference was dominant that year was the best. Now it's all B.S.
@@kavellifrancois1794 according to who you? So you want the same 4 to 8 get a shot at a national championship game. Yeah that sounds fair. Well how about the NFL? Does that Just only four teams from each conference and let them do get out in a playoffs? Yeah that don't seem fair now does it
Soon all teams will be on same level once money comes into play.
Yall didn't watch last year? It was more than 10 but it was highly competitive.
It's all about exposure. If other schools have the opportunity to compete, they will be able to recruit better talent. 2and string guys at schools like Alabama can go be a starter elsewhere
this needed to happen. 85-90% of schools had no shot at a title. No Name U can go undefeated, win every game by 30 and not get ranked in the top 20. mean while, notre dame, bama, texas etc can lose 2-3 games and still be in the mix.
The 12 team format is better than the voting popularity contest we have now. I thought 8 would be perfect, but 12 is better than the current system.
Rob's argument on this topic is awful.
After seeing what Georgia did to oregon, I don’t wanna see the top 12 teams in the playoffs. It’s a big gap in talent
People will get mad once Bama looses 3 games and still win the chip
You see, if you just pay the kids, then they will be happy. Or, they'll REALLY want to sit out.
“Because” is not a good argument Rob.
Those bowl games never mattered. Only the ones involving the championship mattered back in the day, too.
Meh, it gives all of the schools and all of the fans who say, "give us a chance", the opportunity to prove it. It also eliminates those automatic show-ins because of names. Same teams are ranked top 4 every year and still get in with one or sometimes 2 losses. Now it won't matter to run the table if you can get one of the 12 slots.
There has NEVER once been a 2 loss team in the CFP. Look it up
Rob's argument is silly because college football has always been mostly meaningless games. Why would anyone care about Toledo vs Iowa St? And for most of college football history we had these meaningless bowl games . Yet these games still happened so what's the big deal about more playoff games ?
Exactly alot of filler games
I like it… and rob is wrong. No kid is sitting out a playoff game! They all will feel like they can win.
12 teams are a tad bit overkill but still I'm just happy that I don't have to hear anymore complaining from teams that didn't get ranked high enough. They'll have 12 slots, if you ain't good enough, you ain't good enough. There may be more blowouts but at least we'll have definitive, concrete results.
Yes.
Not the same as March Madness -- seeds #1-5 typically have a realistic shot at winning the tourney. That's 20 teams, not 3 or 2 or 1.
It was inevitable but I thought 8 teams would be good enough, cz out of 12 we know half will be filler 🤷🏾♂️
Why would you even put such an idiotic statement on the internet?
4 teams in the playoffs is lame . You need more teams. It was obvious that eventually there would be an expansion. This idea that no teams have a chance then why even watch college football in the first place because only a handful of teams realistically have a chance of winning a chip
No you don’t
For once I finally agree with Rob Parker. I too hate for a playoff expansion. Not needed especially when there going to accept multiple two/three loss teams. That’s no acceptable
not really if you look at the standing the last several years the top 12 only had 2 losses(except maybe 2-3 had 3 or more losses) and most of CFB is about matchups.
Rob Parker is like my toddler. First answer is always “No.”. 😂😂
Broussard played?!... I never once, ever looked at him as an athlete!? (@ 8:33)... But, okay.
Some years will be better than others
I think it’s interesting timing for playoff expansion considering how NIL and college recruiting is drastically changing the landscape talent won’t be as concentrated at certain schools like it use to be so with top recruits spreading out other programs start to become just little bit more competitive imo
Also I think it’s ridiculous so many seasons don’t even have a chance for a natty because even though they win all but 1-2 games a year
rob's so whiny when someone disagrees with him. he sounds all "whoa is me"
"no i'm just saying"
"no i'm just asking"
That was an excellent debate.
Love them talking about College football!!!
12 game playoffs mean more sec schools
i think with 12 is because they are shrinking the number of power conferences so to give schools a better chance that have 2-3 losses
WE'VE HAD 9-7/10-6 TEAMS WIN THE SUPERBOWL .. A 6TH SEED WIN THE NBA CHAMPIONSHIP .. 85 WIN ST LOUIS CARDINALS TEAM WIN THE WORLD SERIES .. IT SHOULD BE A 16 TEAM PLAYOFF .. JUST LIKE EVERY LEVEL OF CFB 🏈 .. AND HIGH SCHOOL 🏈 ..
Well that’s different bro , those are all at least still professional athletes, who literal livelihoods are at stake based on performance. It’s one thing when it’s 2 professional teams playing but when if notre dame and Georgia play in the playoffs . Notre dame will
Lose that 9.5/10 times
Rob just naggin who knows the 12th seed might win it all
Yea they're doing the bye for the first 4 teams, but I really don't think we need all these teams in a playoff when its always clear that the top few teams are exponentially better than the rest. 8 games would be perfect, Rob is a grandpa so he wants the old system, not BCS, but the one when the national title went to the AP #1 team at the end of the year 🤦🏽♂️
That first time a lesser team upsets a powerhouse will prove you wrong and if you know football you know it’s possible.
I miss the old days.. the entire season was a playoff. Every loss really meant something. Now you can lose 2-3 games & still be in the playoff
6 would be perfect. Bye for top 2.. tope 5 conference winners plus one independent. Use bowl games as playoffs.
The thing that rob forgets is that if your team loses a single game or two there’s almost no point in watching the season. At least with an expanded playoff it keeps you engaged throughout. If your team gets in there’s a small chance they can make the finals. It’s football,anything can happen in a single game.
It’s the opposite. Games don’t mean as much. If you lose 2-3 games no big deal
It's all about the money, ain't a damn thing funny.
Both guys made good points. Rob is right, the expansion from 4 to 12 is pure greed not about legit championship competition. Scaling up to grab more cash.
Broussard made my favorite point that every league or sport should follow. Maximize the intensity, intrigue, and importance of every playoff game. The revenue will come from “hi stakes” nature of the games.
I don't watch March madness until it get to the final four. Rob is right, the games are'nt entertaining. I understand it's about money and they want everyone to make some money. But don't try to sell it as entertainment. Wake me up when the #12 ranked team bets the number 1 raked team.
No player in the world is sitting out two games before a championship. Stop the madness Rob. Imagine thinking a team would win if the top players sit out and make a championship
What is the big deal if some of the games are boring? Most people can just turn it off
There at least 8 and with the transfer portal the competition has raised.
College football has always been about what team pays the most for top players. Follow the money, count the championships. We just saw Georgia crush Oregon. We will see Bama, Georgia, Clemson, Tex A&M and a couple others win every year.
the wr from LSU just sat out the year after they won the national championship. Chase
They ain't even Paying these Players.
The 12-team playoff is a good idea but, you have to get rid of polls (i.e. beauty contest). You should be rewarded for production and quality. Rank teams based on defensive, offensive and strength of schedule. Give each team points for wins based on the ranking of the team they beat. Top 12 are in. End of story.
Then if they do the college playoffs, how about the Pac 10 play Mountain West, Big 12, Big 10, SEC, ACC and Vice Versa to make things really competitive
Everyone complain that college football needs a playoffs, now they got it people's don't like to many teams.
I don’t want to see the same teams for generations winning the whole thing … in my life time there has literally been only USC / Miami / Alabama / Georgia / …. For multiple years … Ohio St and Oklahoma haven’t seven won as much …
rob doesn't like change. it's understandable. alot of us are like that.
Instead of 12 they should have went to 8 💯
I am a Notre Dame fan. They get blown out every playoff.
The difference in 🏀 & 🏈 is in basketball when you are playing a high rank out of level team you can and will get embarrassed but you can complete! In football when the match or ranking level are different you risk injury way more Rob is right on this one!!
No he isn't...
His logic is flawed...
I'd rather see 12 teams compete for the chip than a million meaningless bowl games. Making it to the playoff gives real meaning to these programs and kids than some .com bowl no one is going to watch.
It should be 8. The 4 major conferences n 2 mid majors n 2 wild cards(3 lose teams)
Youre gonna watch anyway. Just cut the bull with this debate from guys that say its not enough good teams. We are all gonna watch anyway.
6 team playoff, sure - but 12 is not good for the sport. You want the best playing - not "pretty good" schools. Basically there will be a minimum of 2-3 SEC schools every year
People keep saying “the ncaa basketball tournament” as a good thing but I see that as a horrible thing. The College basketball regular season isn’t even watched. The beauty of football is the urgency of every game. Why dilute the regular season games?
College basketball isn’t watched because the best players leave after their freshman season or go straight to the G league without ever playing in college. Back in thr day when players stayed for 3 or 4 years in college, fans got to know the players and the quality of the game was better in my opinion.
@@1979ATL the season still close to as watchable. There’s no urgency within the games. There’s a reason why football is by far more popular than basketball and baseball.
I think they should’ve went to 6. 8 at the MAX.. Utah was #12 last year at 10-4. 4 games lost and they’re supposed to be good enough to win the Natty ? Ole Miss was #11.. i could go on all the way up until (arguably) the top 4-6 who MOST days would lose to Bama, OState, and Clemson but on any GIVEN day COULD beat them as well.. if that makes sense. but after that you’re talking about 25-40 point blowouts. I mean Ohio State did chew Clemson up but i think that was an outlier. Anyway my point is, this is gonna suck for the most part lol.
Rob always goes worst case about players getting hurt.
Rob is trying to out do Skip with the amount of double talk, all over the placeness & backtracking Rob did in this segment & others.😁 Give Skip back his shtick & gimmick Rob.😆 By the way, there were 58 "I'm just saying" from Rob this clip.🤣
They don't care about the players health!!!
They completely went off topic but, it’s still a good discussion. Will we see more, let’s be clear, top prospects sit out games or whole seasons? Are we going to see more Ja’marr Chases and Ed Olivers and less Jaylen Smiths? If I have this bomb sophomore or freshman year, Mel Kiper got me #1 or top 5 on the board, why bother?
Soft af
ROB EVERY COLLEGE ATHLETE IS NOT GOING TO THE DAMN LEAGUE. STOP IT
All the best players are going to point to Willis McGahee and sit out the bowl games anyway.
Rob is so wrong on this one. That’s what it is good in football. You have a shot at
It will be more sec teams in it
It should just be 6 teams
I see Robs point but it’s always been, any team can beat any team on any given Sunday.
Purdue
Mannnn I would’ve hated Rob Parker to be my teammate..😂😂sheesh
Some teams won’t draft a player that does what Rob says. People don’t want quitters. If they start doing that I promise the NFL will pass on them bc that’s a pathetic decision
These Stupid Power 5 conferences have destroyed the competitiveness of college football
looks like its going to be a power 3 conference i believe thats why they decided 12 teams
Broussard is trying to justify 12 teams soo bad lmaoo! No one wants 12 teams bro! Stop it!
I do, and so many others
I love the idea of 12 teams!! It will make which every bowl game those teams face off in. More meaningful. Right now those bowl games right just exhibition games.
ROB SOUNDS FOOLISH
rob is 100% correct
You can't complain about the horrible bowl games and say the playoffs don't make sense. Players will go to other school. It will be ok for the first 2 yrs but I think after you will see it fix itself. Everyone wont go to bama once it's a bit wide open. Based off of Rob , if you don't go to bama it's over. Cincy stands no chance last yr
they need to go to 16 teams at least
They should have done this years ago.
Rob cries about being entertaining enough?
He likes baseball.... Which has more meaningless games than anyone
Damn rob really? Sorry there may be an extra boring game or 2 but unless the fields expanded there will always only be a few teams worth a title. This will aid in making more schools relevant so its not the same 4 every damn year
At no level of football is there only a 4 team playoff from little league to nfl except fbs football if your the best you’ll win it on the field
His NCAA basketball example was stupid
..
Cus a #16 seed isn't the 12th best team in the country....
So wht he dont have a problem with the 14 NFL teams? We would think tge wild card teams don't have a chance but history tells us different. We have seen wild card teams win super bowls.
Expanding to 12 teams is horrible. There are already way TOO MANY blowouts in the 4 team format.
There have 24 CFP games played & only 6 of them have been decided by 7 points or less. The remaining 18 games have been decided by 10-35 points.
With a 12 team format someone is going to get destroyed by 40-50 points.
So what???
The alternative is no game
@@mobrocket Don’t get me wrong I actually love the 4 team format I wish they would stay with the 4 team format what I’m saying is that there’s already too many blowouts with the better option & that is the 4 team format but expanding it to 12 you’re going to get more of these exorbitant blowouts and it’s going to be worse and I don’t care how big a college football fan you are nobody wants to watch a supposed championship contending team get blown out by 40 or 50 points which is what’s going to happen with this 12 team format
@@jamesrippy1161
But for these teams that miss out being #5 let's say .. those schools would love that shot.
So what if there are more blow outs, is that any better that bowl games that the 5-12 play that mean nothing to them
12 gives more teams to say they made the playoffs to help with recruiting…. It won’t fix the parody problem but it will help….
They ruined bowl games. Used to be so epic.
Rob Parker loosing another debate. What's new.
*winning
Rob disagrees every year with the 4 teams chosen to be in the NCAA Football Playoffs, so just wait, Rob will flip-flop as usual, Rob will want expansion then.😶
It's only a matter of time b4 blue chip prospects start sitting out junior season
Expansion is soild...
Yea I'm sorry but this will not result in the talent spreading out more lol 😆. We might get one upset every other playoff
Wr #8 Bell 🔔 was healthy for The CFP it would've been more entertaining 🤣
I would like 8
But I hate players sitting out of Bowl Games 🏈
Rob shut up , upsets happen
Rob talking non sense