Knowing the trouble Meghan was before marriage the Dukedom title should of never been given to Harry when he married her. And no one should be allowed to sign a 75 year lease on Royal Lodge; so let’s stop blaming; or being critical of KCIII. No one knows what’s going on behind closed doors. Parliament is a hot mess in turmoil and KC has done everything he could without Parliament approval. You’re becoming preachy and remember you’re American
That is exactly why Andrew and Harry are the way they are is because they've never had any consequences for their bad behaviors. Harry needs his title removed.
I agree completely. It's so obvious. With the chaos in the RF it's starting to make them look trashy. I used to respect the RF but, with everyone just running amuck, it's not looking well for them.
I have no opinion as to how a British Constitutional Monarchy handles members of the royal family. But if Prince Harry continues to reside in the US and continues his association with the Aspen Institute, Harry should be either deported or forced to relinquish all his titles and become a US citizen. No British prince has the right to meddle with our US Constitutional rights.
I agree!!! No one should have a title and be in the line of succession if they do not live in Britain. It should go into effect now. The more it goes the more I worry about the monarchy.
As an American, I am truly surprised that the British people have not organized a petition to have these titles and line of succession removed from the desperately duo allegedly
Exactly. Not showing wisdom of the leadership in the monarchy. It will be interesting to see how William will handle it- though it should have already been handled before he takes the throne. I just doubt it will.
@@cinnamongirl5410 Respectfully, this is ignorance of how the monarchy functions, and what it is. Whilst the monarch is nominally head of state, the monarchy does NOT lead. It doesn't have any power to make law - that is Parliament's province alone; the head of state (monarch) merely ratifies Parliamentary decisions.
The Line of Succession extends to literally hundreds of individuals. It is merely a list of people who fulfil 3 basic qualifying factors: lineage/descent, legitimacy, and religion (must be Church of England or a CofE approved denomination, cannot be a Catholic). Being on LoS is no guarantee of actually being offered the Crown, which technically is Parliament's prerogative; and outside the top 6, it carries no additional responsibilities or benefits. It is simply an unfortunate situation that for the first time in the history of the LoS's existence, two of those top 6 have grossly abused their privileges, but it does not actually matter in any real Constitutional sense. Their eligibility to be acting Counsellors of State has already been addressed by Parliament at KC3's urgent request, as soon as he became monarch - Anne and Edward were appointed as lifetime additional Counsellors, rendering A and H effectively redundant. Similar steps could, and doubtless would, instantly be taken if it ever became necessary regarding a potential Regency situation for George. The prospect of either of them ever actually being in a position to take the Crown is so unlikely as to be Constitutionally negligible, but again, if necessary, steps could be taken to prevent this. However, there is no reason to take these steps until, or unless, it is actually relevant - Parliament's time is both limited and valuable, and not to be wasted on hypothetical situations. Which is not the same as saying that consideration has not been given to addressing such situations should the need ever arise.
Charles should not put the onus on Prince William! Charles wants to project an image of a loving and cohesive family … despite the obvious and blatant attempts by Andrew at undermining his older brother and by the Harkles at dethroning the RF. Their behaviour against the RF is reprehensible!
And as I have been saying, what, within the law and protocols, do you think King Charles can do to 'deal?' As for Prince William when he becomes king, he will have exactly the same restrictions as King Charles.
@@rileyperkins2724 Charles stays silent in his weaknessStop pretwnding he has no power to lead the way in putting an end to his son's behaviour. His history isn't so clean if you do your homework. Why do you think he keeps his lid shut?????? His own bwhaviour has been appalling.
Ranker has a poll going on the "Most Disliked Celebrities of 2024". Meghan is #1 and Harry, as of now, is #2. They ARE an embarrassment to the monarchy. I agree with you, Brittany. Time for them to go.
In my opinion, Harry and his wife have only embarrassed themselves. More and more people are recognizing their narcissism, laziness and entitlement and comparing it to the real royals who are carrying on with their duties with honour and dignity. The royal family are doing the right thing in ignoring the doofus duo in America. Never interrupt your enemy when they're making a mistake!
But that model would take years to be passed and probably by the time 10 years rolled in Charles already died and William is the king also no one from the parliament wanted to advocate it as long as there is no parliament member to champion the cause then no one would care about it
I have never heard of this and I live in Sweden. I doubt this because Princess Madeleines children weren't raised in Sweden until recently and they all had titles anyway.
I’m am SICK TO THE BACK TEETH of “poor Andrews doesn’t have the best judgement”& “poor Harry, not the brightest bulb on the shelf” RIGHT!! These men know EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING!!! STRIP THE TITLES OR LOSE THE WHOLE MONARCHY!! SIMPLE AS THAT!!!
your absolutely right they know exactly what they are selling to the highest bidder family be dammed, they both feel they have nothing to lose and money to gain and are utterly out of control, they are dumb as posts but not on how to sell the family influence Andrew, Fergie and others did it the entire time Harry grew up ofc he knows how that part can work. imo
It’s starting to feel that way .. The King , Government’s, don’t seem to be listening to the people … And The UK and Commonwealth have had enough of the games .. Strip the Titles , so they don’t feel so privileged.. we know who they are , they don’t need titles just to misuse them . They aren’t Royal , especially when you go against the Monarchy .! Hope The Prince of Wales is listening to the people and watching ..! Cause he needs to be as strong as his Grandmother was … The Late Queen taught you everything you need to know… !! Use her wisdom and her knowledge… You got taught by the best William. You can do this ..! ❤️🇦🇺
I agree that H should absolutely lose his title AND imo be removed from the LOS including his alleged children. If the duo wants to keep those children hidden away, they can when those children become private citizens with no royal titles and no place in the LOS. As a Canadian, the British monarch is the Head of State of my country and KC owes us the truth about those children, period.
100 percent agree. I too am a Canadian citizen but live in the US as a permanent resident and therefore Charles remains my King. Long past the time he deal with the messes his son and wife, as well as his brother have created.
Why? No reason at all why he should. I’d like to see what comes out in court next year about the collusion of some members of his family with the gutter press.
Why east. There is zero reason someone should be running around California calling himself the Duke of Sussex or Duchess of Sussex or Prince or Princess. And as far that court case. There’s no there there. The only person who is making $$ is the lawyer.
@@gillianbrown8502 Never mind the court case, what about all the lies from his wife's mouth and all the lies in Spare. How much do H&M pay to have you stick up for them?
Never going to happen. It's unnecessary and requires too much diplomatic and Parliamentary time. I really wish this narrative would stop because it's so unrealistic and just stirs the pot against the current Monarch. William will have the same problems and the same restraints.
Completely agree! Harry needs to let go of his former royal life if he ever has a chance of being happy in the life he’s chosen. The best thing the RF could do for him and Andrew at this point is to remove their titles, place in LoS, and completely sever royal ties. Letting them hang onto their royal connections only provides false airs and security and damages the royal family.
Andrew and Harry were both spoiled rotten because they are the spares to the King/future King. In my opinion, both men never really matured mentally. Andrew and Harry need to realize they are grown adults who are embarrassing themselves through their actions, not their family members doing it.
She was counted as a laziest royal in 2023 and has not done anything impactful other than we’re pretty dresses. Are you stupid? She has a job to do to earn all those millions. You’re impressed quite easily. This is why that monarchy will end
@@irmaadams7780 Stop forcing your narrative onto reality. lol Catherine was literally named one of Time's people of the year in the US. She's popular, viewed as kind and always supporting charitable causes. THAT monarchy is the most famous monarchy in the world.
KC3 will do nothing. It will fall to William to clean up the mess his Uncle and brother have made. BTW Fergie did something similar when she was an active Duchess and invited an Arab actively working in terrorism to BP. The desire for money has destroyed these two men.
They should start by taking their names away from the website, shutting down their Instagram accounts and take them out as 'Counselours of State' . I know the king wants to leave the door open for Harry and won't have the guts to cut him out of the line of successtion. But the Dukedom titles should go also. Or at least forbid them to use it in a professional capacity, like King Harald of Norway did to Märtha Louise when she tried that "The Princess and the Shaman" thing.
The situation is more nuanced, and delicate, in reality than you allow for. Like it or not, H is the King's son, so to completely exclude him from the RF website would be a huge snub, and in PR terms - as we have seen over the last 5 years - this could be massively exploited by anti-monarchist factions. The Counsellors of State situation was immediately dealt with by KC3 in one of his first acts as monarch, by requesting Parliament to appoint Anne and Edward as additional lifetime Counsellors (Dec 2022), effectively rendering both H&A redundant. It is unfortunate that the general population of GB is largely ignorant of how their own monarchy works, constitutional speaking, and the details of such things are never reported in the media, which means that people assume that the monarch has the capacity to simply strip titles or cut individuals from LoS in some sort of petty kneejerk retribution for any perceived disobedience of disrespect from family members. Even if it were possible, it would not necessarily be advisable, in a wider sense. As a constitutional construct, the monarchy has to be seen to be above such personal squabbles and take a longer term approach. In 20 years' time, both A and H will be footnotes in history; just as Diana now is, even though she once appeared to be holding the future of the monarchy in the palm of her hand.
@@luciedupont6477I think that Henry's now wife convinced him that not using their titles ended with QEII's passing. They have started using the titles with no repercussions.
Britanny, you are correct, priviledges come with responsibility. Both Andrew nor Hazbeen have lost their proviledge because of their horrendous behavior and lack of morals, not to mention trading off their connection to the royal family for personal fulfillment. Feel better soon.
It's time for KC and RF to come clean concerning to 2 kids that are nonexistent and on the line of succession. It is a day late and a dollar short for this action to have taken place.
I seriously do not understand after all they have done, especially the demon he is married to, they just let it go. I get no complain, no explain, but come on now. Its beyond ridiculous
Sometimes we have to let a family member go for the sake of the mental well being of the rest of the family. It's not just their behaviour, it's the unanswered questions that come with them if included. The public have a right to know.
Being a Monarch is NOT like being a normal person ... a normal parent, etc. It should be country and Kingdom first. Family is only a consideration for the sake of the continuation of the Monarchy, nothing less. Conflating being a monarch and being a father / brother is confusing the role. The subjects do not care about the monarch's brother or son. They care about where their kingdom is heading. Throughout the history of kingdoms, monarchs lose their crown ... and their heads ... when members of their family abuse their privileges. I am aghast Charles has lost that lesson. Maybe he really is too old for the role.
Brittany, I completely agree with you. With Andrew, he enjoys being a member of the royal family. He understands his role in the family and he understands the privilege and that comes along with it and he enjoys that. Harry is a completely different story. He has made it very, very clear that he has no intention on being a member of the royal family. He does not want to be a working royal. he and his wife and their children have no plans on ever living in the UK ever again. They are going to be Americans. For that alone, he should be stripped of everything. All titles, positions, everything should go. There’s no reason for him to have any of these things. He should just be a private citizen. Sadly, King Charles has waited a very, very long time for his position and he does not want any controversy during his reign, so he will be leaving this mess up to King William to sort out.
They are going to be Americans. For that alone he should be stripped of everything. It kinda sounds like a put down on Americans am I misunderstanding?
Prince William will have to taint his reign by cleaning up the mess King Charles caused. When Charles cheated on Diana, he should have lost the crown. Cheating goes sgainst the Church the Royals represent. The world would have been better served with Princess Ann as Queen . At 35, Prince Charles was behaving not much better then harry at 35.
King Charles needs to stop running his family through the mud. He needs to get with attorneys and shut down the gruesome twosome, as well as Andrew. Enough already.
The king has added Ann and Edward so Harry won't be asked the king as affectively taken that away without actually doing it.. THE king cannot strip their titles that has to be done by an act of Parliament why take them off the line of succession the chances of them getting near the throne is nil ( the british public would rather have a Republic than them pair as king and queen) .. and apart from anything else I think the king as his health to worry about not two child adults living in the US. We know they are full of hot air they are so jealous of catherine and william they are letting it consume their sad little lives
@@bowlingbill9633you are right, but it takes only one signature from the King to put Henry's prince title away. That would give enough nod to the Parliament to start the process of removing dukedom and other titles. Henry already denanunced his titles, especially prince title and that was five years ago in the conference where he said he doesn't want to be prince harry. He said I want to be called Just Harry. On this ground the King has a right to make a first step. Maybe that would help Just Harry to start living and earn living . It is obvious that his anger and hate comes from the titles, he saw them as a distraction. Just Harry, we all are Just Trying To Help You 😉
There is TOO much on King Charles to have him oust anyone given his own abysmal behaviors; a full relationship, plenty of photos with Jimmy Saville, the most prolific pedo in UK history. Saville, given posts of great power by Prince Charles and Queen Elizabeth II. Charles giving Mahfouz Marei Mubarak bin Mahfouz honorary Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire (CBE) title for CASH. Having an affair entire time he was married. There is likely FAR more, those two nitwits Andy and Harry are NOT going anywhere, or WE are going to find out ALL the dirt. Full Stop.
@@shamaal123The Late Queen was never going to abdicate because of the abdication crisis of 1936, and because she dedicated herself to a life of service to her realm, for her whole life.
Agree completely. I have warmed to KC over the years but this is hands down the biggest mistake of his reign ignoring his treacherous son’s abhorrent and ongoing behavior. Prince William should not have to clean this mess up because KC doesn’t have the spine to.
The King has not ignored the behavior, he cut Harry out of all communciation, he kicked him out of Frogmore, he has not granted him any leeway from the decisions of the Sandringham Summit with himself, the late Queen and Prince William. At this point everyone knows that Andrew is out and so is Harry.
Being a King also means being able to make hard decisions ... and not being such a woss when a family members puts the Royal reputation into disrepute.
@@Tiglath-PileserXIX If you think KC is a "woss", why does it matter to you? I do not think the RF's reputation is in anyway is in disrepute. I think they are doing a fantastic job of this transition forward.
In my opinion, the longer the Royal Family will keep putting off the removal of those titles as well as removing them from the line of succession, the more reputational damage will be done to the monarchy.
I am not a Monarchist and frankly do not mind seeing the British Monarchy go away. Having said that, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the immediate Royal Family members. They are a truly hard working and sincere bunch. It is the Hangers On and the Cling Ons, like the Sussexes and the Yorks, that I detest. They have no role to play in the modern Royal Family yet they crave all the entitlements and privileges. if the Crown is to survive it really ought to remove these parasites, or they will cause more reputational damage. That is how past monarchies collapsed.
I am a American but I think the monarchy should have to put country above family, I know that is hard, but the very reason it should be in place... then you should resign....If you are not strong enough to do that, they have two bad eggs bring down their loyalty to the people!!!
Exactly! Being a Monarch is NOT like being a normal person ... a normal parent, etc. It should be country and Kingdom first. Family is only a consideration for the sake of the continuation of the Monarchy, nothing less. Conflating being a monarch and being a father / brother is confusing the role. The subjects do not care about the monarch's brother or son. They care about where their kingdom is heading. Throughout the history of kingdoms, monarchs lose their crown ... and their heads ... when members of their family abuse their privileges. I am aghast Charles has lost that lesson. Maybe he really is too old for the role.
WELL SAID! He would allow Harry to kiII people in front of a crowd and Charles would still bail him out & spend millions of tax-payer dollars on him, simply cause Harry is his "darling boy." The monarchy has proven they aren't fit to lead! The citizens are always last!
@@Tiglath-PileserXIX You seem to be unaware that KC3 has only been monarch, and therefore in any position to do anything, for just over 2 years. And leaving that aside, the role of the British monarch is not to 'lead' the kingdom, except in the nominal sense, as head of state. The monarch reigns, but does not rule - Parliament wields the actual power. And leaving THAT aside also, it is entirely arguable that, by not indulging in personal petty kneejerk responses such as stripping titles, etc, both QE2 and KC3 have indeed been putting the monarchy, country and state above mere family concerns. By resisting any personal revenge impulses, they are demonstrating that the monarchy and thus the state is above such relatively trivial personal issues. Stripping titles from errant minor royals might be seen as satisfying, but in a longer term constitutional/political sense it is an irrelevant and unnecessary waste of Parliament's valuable time, and whilst some might argue that it shows 'strength' for the monarch to smite ungrateful minor royals, others would use it as a PR opportunity to show him/her as an oppressive tyrant.
In this day and age, the title means nothing if a prince behaves like a common criminal, if a prince lies and frauds and demeans, belittles, his own family. In this day and age, people will not bow to such poor examples of leadership, nor should the people finance traitors and thieves.
For someone who was raised by two very strong parents I’m surprised KC3 is as weak as he is. He continues to allow his miserable spiteful son and narcissistic daughter-in law to continue to make a mockery of the RF. Everyone blames Thomas Markle’s parenting style for the way Rachel turned out but KC3 does the same thing with Harold. These two have never faced consequences for their actions and until drastic action is taken NOTHING will change!
King Charles is not weak. He's worried that if he was to take everything from Harry, he will end himself. He is a drug addict and mentally unstable so I can understand where he's coming from. Removing titles has bigger implications on all members of the royal family as well. Lady C has explained that numerous times. I can't stand Harry so please don't think I'm defending him, it's just as a parent, I can understand how difficult it is.
I would LOVE to see Harry lose his titles of “Duke” and “Prince” . They should be removed from the LOS . However , The King is not being weak . Harry was born a Prince , he was not elected nor gained his titles . If you remove one Princes title it sets a precedent that ALL royal titles from any /all of the Royals can be removed . It would be a danger for the Monarchy , they would leave the door open for any socialist Government to abolish The Monarchy . Charles has to tread a careful path . I do agree that Royal children in the LOS should be educated and resident in the UK by law .
@@MeAndAbby1such a great point! I've said from the beginning of his reign that he was weak & apathetic, he is Harry's doormat. He's allowed H&M to become what they've become today by not doing the right thing and holding them accountable!
Sadly, William will pay hell from his detractors as a vindictive, mean spirited brother. King Charles needs to work with parliament to remove the titles, and have definite DNA proof of the legitimacy of Harry’s children, and remove them from the line of succession. The Dukedom was given in good faith by the Queen wishing, probably against her better judgement, to honor Harry. Hoping for the best with the worst standing right before her, was her only alternative. But, I believe deep down Her Majesty knew megan was poison. 🙏
At this summit, Princes William and Edward and Princess Anne need to sit down and have a firm talk with King Charles. Tell him as parents and siblings they get they don't want to close that final door to a child/sibling. BUT Harry and Andrew are ruining the Monarchy and Harry and MeMe is making a mockery of what real Royals are. The titles need to go. I would tell them that when they send that plan to remove titles, they are releasing a statement and calling Harry at the same time. The statement needs to be clear that titles are a promise that the royals are servants to the people of the UK and Commonwealth. That as family they are always welcome, as royals they are done. As this statement is given to the public, someone (I vote Princess Anne) is on the phone to Harry and MeMe saying that their misinformation/attacks/lies are done and if they continue this, more so after titles are removed, lawyers will be involved.
Thank you, agreed. I'm American and really respected and honored Queen Elizabeth. I respected the Monarchy. But since harry and meghan it seems the Monarchy isn't respecting itself, so it is losing respect of the people. How can they allow this public flogging for so long and do nothing? Where are their standards and dignity? Pretty sad.
Why are they being flogged for maintaining their dignity? Just because they are not doing what dos not mean they deserve a flogging. Leave them alone to run their family as they choose FGS!
If things keep going the way they are, I don't think it looks good for the Monarchy! The two 'SPARES' are slowly chipping away at the credibility of the Royal Family. and, with so much being swept under the carpet so to speak, by the Royal family of the bad behaviour of those two (three countig MMarkel), both in the past and in the present,.. people are slowly going to turn against the Royal Family, and the Monarchy will eventually collapse. I even think that Harry is so twisted with jealousy, bitterness for imagined offenses, and rage that he is bent on destroying his own family and the Monarchy. I completely agree with you that KC needs to make the tough decision to remove titles and counselor of state since they are no longer working as Royals. Harry & M & kids arent even living in England. They in no way represent the Monarchy. KC by not taking action comes off as looking weak and people lose respect for him and the crown.
It is also concerning that an heir to the throne used a property belonging to a Russian in Canada plus purchased a house which also belonged to a Russian. The fake royal tours to corrupt officials in Nigeria and now Colombia are extremely alarming! This two do not have any sort of realistic understanding of the threats they pose or how they can be used against the monarchy and Britain and are a definite security threat!
If any of us regular people would've done a fraction of what Harry or Andrew did, we would be UNDER the prison! The monarchy is a JOKE & a massive disappointment.
The king needs to take care of Harry and Andrew before William has to step in to do it. It shouldn't be left up to William, who I am sure would kick them out in a heartbeat but that is really not his responsibility to discipline a brother and uncle.
It doesn't really matter who deals with these renegade princes. Charles and / or William really ought to act like Kings or they will have no Kingdom to reign over.
@@Tiglath-PileserXIX This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how the British monarchy works and what power the monarch does and does not have. The monarch can do little of his or her own volition, without Parliamentary approval and/or action. Parliament's time is both valuable and limited, and it therefore only acts on situations which it perceives as political imperatives or requiring urgent evasive action. The activities of H and A, whilst embarrassing and annoying, currently do not constitute any sort of actual emergency, whilst the potential dangers of overreacting and provoking a media/PR backlash means that a 'steady as she goes' approach is almost always going to be the one adopted.
I still can't believe the late Queen let h & m keep their titles after the sandringham summit. She had to know markle would commercialize them almost immediately.
I do not think a monarch can take the Prince title away, if she did take back the Duke and Duchess title Meghan would then use Harry`s Prince title she would be known as Princess Henry, but we all know she would call herself Princess Meghan.
And how would that have looked? The late Queen could hardly punish them for things they might very probably do, but hadn't done yet, could she? She told them not to use their HRH privilege for commercial purposes, and not to blatantly merch their royal connections, and she trusted them to keep to their word, because that was all she could reasonably do, at that time.
Brittany, you need to further look into the Harkles' involvement with Betterup. Something is shady with that "coaching app", and what does Harry know anyway?
@@MeAndAbby1 Just like the Queen left for KC too handle. Quit blaming KC and calling him weak. KC was King one year before contracting cancer and his plates been extremely full since the Queen died; so give the man a break.
Sorry he is ill but if a King cannot make the tough decisions then he should step down. I suspect he is afraid to do anything to Harry due to Harry's poor mental state. KC was already blamed (unjustly I must add) for the death of his wife, maybe he fears being blamed again if Harry decides to .....
In the old days it was called treason, and they lost their heads. In modern times, they have to think of something else. But there does need to be something.
Harry has gone out of his way to embarrass and damage the monarchy...he is vengeful and malicious. Andrew has done damage because of his sense of entitlement and his lust but has always had the deepest respect for the monarchy and revered and loved his late parents. Two entirely different situations here. Harry is a loose cannon, Andrew is harming nothing.
Prince Andrew should have been removed from the line of succession and a new Letters Patent drawn up showing the only line is through Prince William and Princess Catherine.
The "Spares" would not pay attention in class and would receive a failing grade in the class. Why should Princess Anne waste her time on them? She is already the hardest working royal in the Monarchy!
Anne was not the Spare, she is now 17th or 19th in line of succession. Her three brothers and their children and their children's children out rank her.
It's honestly not a good look for them to not hold their members to account. Feels like the awful examples don't suffer real consequences. They should be removed from the LOS in my opinion. They don't represent anyone but themselves now.
I am not a Monarchist and frankly do not mind seeing the British Monarchy go away. Having said that, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the immediate Royal Family members. They are a truly hard working and sincere bunch. It is the Hangers On and the Cling Ons, like the Sussexes and the Yorks, that I detest. They have no role to play in the modern Royal Family yet they crave all the entitlements and privileges. if the Crown is to survive it really ought to remove these parasites, or they will cause more reputational damage. That is how past monarchies collapsed.
Your channel and content are fun. But you also make points and arguments really intelligently and effectively. And this is one of your very best. So much so that I hope it will reach the British Royal Family. I love the British Royal Family. And have hated to see the damage done by Andrew and Harry. Your suggestion regarding a solution similar to Sweden and additional points you’ve made here are fair and straightforward. BTW…your voice sounds very cool. But am sorry you might not be feeling a hundred percent. I’ve had a sinus infection that progressed into bronchitis….for almost a month. Very frustrating. Thank you again Brittany
Thank you so much!! I’m so glad you like it! Yes, you can definitely hear my cold a bit in my voice. Hopefully, I’ll get better soon. And yes, I think these changes could easily be made and are simple and direct. Thanks for watching!!
My final comment, the Royal Family (via counselors of state or line of succession) had no control over King Edward and his plan to marry Wallis Simpson. It was Parliament that finally forced the abdication. The issue was never the marriage, Parliament feared the King's relationship with Hitler, that is why the abdication was forced. Parliament can remove Andrew and Harry from the line of succession and as counselors of state, they have removed a King from the throne.
Counsellors of State is a non-issue. As soon as he became monarch, KC3 requested Parliament to appoint Anne and Edward as additional lifetime CoS, effectively as replacements for Andrew and H. This came into effect in December 2022. So there is no question that either A or H will ever called upon to act. Line of Succession is a non-issue also: the only responsibility that is intrinsically linked to LoS is that the top 6 are automatically eligible to be CoS and to act as potential Regent. As shown, the CoS situation has been neutralised for A & H already, and the Regent situation could be similarly dealt with should it ever become necessary - but at present, there is no need to go there, because William, as heir, is an adult and in no need of a Regent. Should he become King whilst George is still a minor, then legislation would be immediately drawn up to ensure the appointment of a suitable Regent, should he need one - the same was done in 1953 when QE2 became Queen, when both her children were under age. Actually removing either A or H from LoS is otherwise both irrelevant and unnecessary. Neither is realistically ever likely to be in a position to accede to the Crown, and if by mischance that ever did come about, Parliament could, and doubtless would, take evasive action. But until then, it would be a waste of valuable and limited Parliamentary time to address something so unlikely ever to be an actual issue, especially given the constitutional difficulties involved.
Why does the parliament keep turning the blind eye on this misbehavior??? When a lymph is going rotten you remove it, you dont just turn the blind eye until it is too late...🤔
I agree that they can't continue ignoring bad behavior. It's gone on for centuries and we live in a different era now. It makes them all look self indulgent.
I agree with you. The days of Allowing Public Preception & dragging the Monarchy through the Mud are done & over. Should have let go when the Queen's Reign was over. What Gets me & i still Question is: What Does Charles want his Legacy to be as King? We know what his Mother's was..but,How does he want to be remembered,etc? Some still don't like him. I like him as King But, not as The Prince of Wales under his Mother. And, Does he want Prince William to put an end to it when he comes King? Because we all get a sense of what William thinks. I would also like to see a letters of Patten where: If you Do the things that Harry & Andrew have done along with moving out of Country. Whoever is next(In This Case Zara or Louise.) Have the options of either Become a full-time Working member or Represent the Monarchy in a certain capacity & do smaller Engaments. But, it's by Choice.
Aww, girl, you still sound so sick! I hope you get some good rest, some delicious tea and feel better soon!! ❤❤❤❤ Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! Thank you for the videos. They always make my day 😊
Hope you had a happy Christmas, and get over your cold. Agree that action should be taken sooner than later, depending on the results of the investigation.
Harry was told that if they leave then their level of security would be lower. But he now believes he is entitled to the maximum security. He knew the security consequences of his and hers' decision to leave.
The biggest problem with H&M is that they really didn't want to leave the Monarchy, they wanted to be in but only with their own preferences. When that didn't work out, they thought they will be so missed that the public will demand their return. When nothing of the above occurred, they got mad (in all the meanings of the word) and they still keep that attitude today.
Yes, absolutely agree. They gambled hugely on their own popularity, hoping to keep all the perks and privileges whilst jettisoning all the routine work and constitutional restrictions of being royal, and the RF called their bluff.
I must say with both Dukes the Monarchy has taken a soft approach; and in my personal opinion they have accommodated both of them into not taking accountability. Thank you for a another video Ms. Brittany. 💙💙
Of course H&M have had consequences. Their security pulled, Frogmore cottage gone, access to RF gone, prestige & reputation gone, perks of living as Royals gone, freebies gone. What do they have now compared to what they wanted? Only titles. Empty titles. They wanted the free lifestyle perks, security, freebies etc. Basically they wanted everything that they had before plus the freedom to pursue commerce using titles so they could ADD to their situation. Instead they lost everything. We have a saying “you go to conquer a country only to lose even your village”. Not shedding a tear for these two. The people (their own families) they sacrificed at the alter of their personal success. Ruthlessly at that. They played for broke and now are broke with a dead end in front of them.
The more of these "scandals" come to light, the more I see hapless Andrew being used as deflection for wrongdoers in very high places, just as he was in the Epstein case.
Charles in not a good king, he is too weak - a good king would put his realm and his subjects before his personal feelings as a father. The Monarchy is a business - it has to be run like that, ppl would respect that
Being a Monarch is NOT like being a normal person ... a normal parent, etc. It should be country and Kingdom first. Family is only a consideration for the sake of the continuation of the Monarchy, nothing less. Conflating being a monarch and being a father / brother is confusing the role. The subjects do not care about the monarch's brother or son. They care about where their kingdom is heading. Throughout the history of kingdoms, monarchs lose their crown ... and their heads ... when members of their family abuse their privileges. I am aghast Charles has lost that lesson. Maybe he really is too old for the role.
Prince William probably agrees that Harry and Andrew must be dealt with. It's a future problem that I believe is holding things back. Who would William have as working royals? Beatrice and Eugenie won't help if their father is removed. Zara is not titled, and Louise hasn't made a decision on her title, much less working as a royal.
Harry and Andrew are not working royals, and I believe that Beatrice and her husband would step up if asked to be working royals. Zara and Mike Tindall might as well.
Lady Louise Windsor, who is now 21, did in fact make a decision, both on taking the style (not title) of princess, for which she is technically eligible, and on being a working royal. It was a no to both. We do not know what Beatrice and Eugenie may or may not do in future. Beatrice is, technically, an approved Counsellor of State, so may be inclined to become more involved than she has been so far.
@@rasaalchemy Zara Tindall is not only not a royal, being descended through the female line, but is a very long way down the line of succession, coming in behind Zara's brother, Peter. And, as she and her husband would certainly be required to give up all their lucrative commercial interests, it is highly unlikely either that she would be invited to become a working royal, or would be tempted to do so.
Harry should no longer be on the LOS or be councillor of state. He has no knowledge of dealing with foreign dignatories and has no decorum. He is rude and crude and does not behave as a member of the royal family.
I agree!! For heaven sakes they done so much damage and their in their 60’s and 40’s. Everybody’s always making excuses and all that started when they turned 2 0r 3 years old!!
Apart from being known as "Randy Andy", I can't think of any REAL scandals concerning the young Andrew. And remember he was an ACTUAL helicopter pilot in an ACTUAL conflict, where even people who didn't like him as a person were full of praise for his bravery, skill and actions. Compare that with Henry's drug taking/mental therapy/naked stunts in Las Vegas/racist remarks/pretend soldiering, vexatious litigation and now all culminating in the constant attacks on his family, slandering and lying in print and on screen,
The King himself cannot remove their titles. It would take an act of Parliament. He could possibly remove the title Prince. If the Dukedom is removed. Meghan would become Princess Henry. But she would disregard that, and call herself Princess Meghan. It’s all very complicated.
I agree. Unfortunately Charles is weak. And I suspect that he is aware that his son is a ret@rd who won't survive a divorce. So he is holding out just in case.
It is up to Parliament to strip Duke & Duchess titles. Only a Working Royal can be a Counsellor of State, so Andrew, Harry & Beatrice were cut ages ago
They should have been stripped of their titles years ago.
If titles removed only, the one that shan't be named will IMMEDIATELY put out stories calling herself princess.
Knowing the trouble Meghan was before marriage the Dukedom title should of never been given to Harry when he married her. And no one should be allowed to sign a 75 year lease on Royal Lodge; so let’s stop blaming; or being critical of KCIII. No one knows what’s going on behind closed doors. Parliament is a hot mess in turmoil and KC has done everything he could without Parliament approval. You’re becoming preachy and remember you’re American
Blame the former queen. I believe it was 99 years and 75 years are left.
EXACTLY
I’m not sure they can lose their titles because they are princes by birthright.
That is exactly why Andrew and Harry are the way they are is because they've never had any consequences for their bad behaviors. Harry needs his title removed.
I agree completely. It's so obvious. With the chaos in the RF it's starting to make them look trashy. I used to respect the RF but, with everyone just running amuck, it's not looking well for them.
@@jessieyork4508 Yes, I agree that it does make them all look bad. King Charles needs to get a hand on it.
Well said! 👏👏👏 Charles is weak & apathetic
💯 🎯
@@TJ-um8ce I agree. He's going to leave all these problems for William. If the monarchy fails it will be his own doing.
Parliament need to remove the titles
Parliament has bigger problems to deal with, as does the country. Never going to happen.
Parliament under Starmer are too busy hurting the British people. So need a new government so things can be done properly
If that is what it takes.... so be it
I have no opinion as to how a British Constitutional Monarchy handles members of the royal family. But if Prince Harry continues to reside in the US and continues his association with the Aspen Institute, Harry should be either deported or forced to relinquish all his titles and become a US citizen. No British prince has the right to meddle with our US Constitutional rights.
Agree!!
It’s really truly utterly baffling how long that scam has been permitted to be carried out.
Exactly. Harry has said outrageous things
👍👍💯
I agree!!! No one should have a title and be in the line of succession if they do not live in Britain. It should go into effect now. The more it goes the more I worry about the monarchy.
It’s horrifying that these two are included in the line of accession to the crown.
As an American, I am truly surprised that the British people have not organized a petition to have these titles and line of succession removed from the desperately duo allegedly
Exactly. Not showing wisdom of the leadership in the monarchy. It will be interesting to see how William will handle it- though it should have already been handled before he takes the throne. I just doubt it will.
@@cinnamongirl5410 Respectfully, this is ignorance of how the monarchy functions, and what it is. Whilst the monarch is nominally head of state, the monarchy does NOT lead. It doesn't have any power to make law - that is Parliament's province alone; the head of state (monarch) merely ratifies Parliamentary decisions.
The Line of Succession extends to literally hundreds of individuals. It is merely a list of people who fulfil 3 basic qualifying factors: lineage/descent, legitimacy, and religion (must be Church of England or a CofE approved denomination, cannot be a Catholic). Being on LoS is no guarantee of actually being offered the Crown, which technically is Parliament's prerogative; and outside the top 6, it carries no additional responsibilities or benefits. It is simply an unfortunate situation that for the first time in the history of the LoS's existence, two of those top 6 have grossly abused their privileges, but it does not actually matter in any real Constitutional sense. Their eligibility to be acting Counsellors of State has already been addressed by Parliament at KC3's urgent request, as soon as he became monarch - Anne and Edward were appointed as lifetime additional Counsellors, rendering A and H effectively redundant. Similar steps could, and doubtless would, instantly be taken if it ever became necessary regarding a potential Regency situation for George. The prospect of either of them ever actually being in a position to take the Crown is so unlikely as to be Constitutionally negligible, but again, if necessary, steps could be taken to prevent this. However, there is no reason to take these steps until, or unless, it is actually relevant - Parliament's time is both limited and valuable, and not to be wasted on hypothetical situations. Which is not the same as saying that consideration has not been given to addressing such situations should the need ever arise.
@@Poloponyif it doesn’t have any power, what’s the point of it?!
As I have been saying, in fairness to William, King Charles should deal with the traitor and the roge asap
Charles should not put the onus on Prince William! Charles wants to project an image of a loving and cohesive family … despite the obvious and blatant attempts by Andrew at undermining his older brother and by the Harkles at dethroning the RF. Their behaviour against the RF is reprehensible!
And as I have been saying, what, within the law and protocols, do you think King Charles can do to 'deal?' As for Prince William when he becomes king, he will have exactly the same restrictions as King Charles.
@@rileyperkins2724 Charles stays silent in his weaknessStop pretwnding he has no power to lead the way in putting an end to his son's behaviour. His history isn't so clean if you do your homework. Why do you think he keeps his lid shut?????? His own bwhaviour has been appalling.
Ranker has a poll going on the "Most Disliked Celebrities of 2024". Meghan is #1 and Harry, as of now, is #2. They ARE an embarrassment to the monarchy. I agree with you, Brittany. Time for them to go.
Meghan is more disliked than Diddy!!! Lmao
In my opinion, Harry and his wife have only embarrassed themselves. More and more people are recognizing their narcissism, laziness and entitlement and comparing it to the real royals who are carrying on with their duties with honour and dignity. The royal family are doing the right thing in ignoring the doofus duo in America. Never interrupt your enemy when they're making a mistake!
The Swedish model of having to be raised and educated in their country to keep titles is very sensible. I hope the British RF adopt this model.
Also need to be a working royal so they can keep abreast of current issues.
But that model would take years to be passed and probably by the time 10 years rolled in Charles already died and William is the king also no one from the parliament wanted to advocate it as long as there is no parliament member to champion the cause then no one would care about it
I generally agree but I don’t think William wants to provide any incentive for Harry to move back given all that’s happened.
@@bmj.143Exactly this
I have never heard of this and I live in Sweden. I doubt this because Princess Madeleines children weren't raised in Sweden until recently and they all had titles anyway.
I’m am SICK TO THE BACK TEETH of “poor Andrews doesn’t have the best judgement”& “poor Harry, not the brightest bulb on the shelf” RIGHT!!
These men know EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING!!! STRIP THE TITLES OR LOSE THE WHOLE MONARCHY!! SIMPLE AS THAT!!!
I prefer how the Ottomans used to deal with spares: When a new Sultan ascends the throne, they St@ngle the Spares.
your absolutely right they know exactly what they are selling to the highest bidder family be dammed, they both feel they have nothing to lose and money to gain and are utterly out of control, they are dumb as posts but not on how to sell the family influence Andrew, Fergie and others did it the entire time Harry grew up ofc he knows how that part can work. imo
So agree
Both brown men who keep getting away with bad behavior as if they are still children, pathetic.
It’s starting to feel that way .. The King , Government’s, don’t seem to be listening to the people … And The UK and Commonwealth have had enough of the games .. Strip the Titles , so they don’t feel so privileged.. we know who they are , they don’t need titles just to misuse them . They aren’t Royal , especially when you go against the Monarchy .!
Hope The Prince of Wales is listening to the people and watching ..! Cause he needs to be as strong as his Grandmother was … The Late Queen taught you everything you need to know… !! Use her wisdom and her knowledge… You got taught by the best William. You can do this ..! ❤️🇦🇺
I agree that H should absolutely lose his title AND imo be removed from the LOS including his alleged children. If the duo wants to keep those children hidden away, they can when those children become private citizens with no royal titles and no place in the LOS. As a Canadian, the British monarch is the Head of State of my country and KC owes us the truth about those children, period.
Unfortunately, King Charles favours his "grand children" more than his colonial subjects.
100 percent agree. I too am a Canadian citizen but live in the US as a permanent resident and therefore Charles remains my King. Long past the time he deal with the messes his son and wife, as well as his brother have created.
Completely agree 🇨🇦
Prince Harry definitely should lose his title.
Why? No reason at all why he should. I’d like to see what comes out in court next year about the collusion of some members of his family with the gutter press.
Why east. There is zero reason someone should be running around California calling himself the Duke of Sussex or Duchess of Sussex or Prince or Princess.
And as far that court case. There’s no there there. The only person who is making $$ is the lawyer.
Starting with his wife. She's the biggest contributor to the gutter press@@gillianbrown8502
@@gillianbrown8502 Never mind the court case, what about all the lies from his wife's mouth and all the lies in Spare.
How much do H&M pay to have you stick up for them?
His title is his property. The Prince styling dies with Archie and Lily.
The use of titles needs to be regulated for sure.
The best I have read yet…Harry and Andrew need to be removed from succession and all other titles removed from their family members.
I remember reading that Andrew fought tooth and nail for his daughters to be titled as princesses. It was tied up with his own ego, of course.
Never going to happen. It's unnecessary and requires too much diplomatic and Parliamentary time. I really wish this narrative would stop because it's so unrealistic and just stirs the pot against the current Monarch. William will have the same problems and the same restraints.
Completely agree! Harry needs to let go of his former royal life if he ever has a chance of being happy in the life he’s chosen. The best thing the RF could do for him and Andrew at this point is to remove their titles, place in LoS, and completely sever royal ties. Letting them hang onto their royal connections only provides false airs and security and damages the royal family.
Agreed! It’s the only way forward. Thanks for watching!!
Only Parliament has that authority. The King has done all he legally can do.
Well said
Well said ❤ 🇺🇸 even tho we don't want the harkles
@@RavenAutumnAngel i wonder if he has formaly asked parliment to remove titles ?
Andrew and Harry were both spoiled rotten because they are the spares to the King/future King. In my opinion, both men never really matured mentally. Andrew and Harry need to realize they are grown adults who are embarrassing themselves through their actions, not their family members doing it.
Agreed! They are definitely both very immature! Thanks for watching!!
Not only immature but d u m b
💯 🎯
Treason I say!! To the tower!
@@carolr9747If only 😅
My congratulations to Princess Catherine for being voted one of the greatest Brits in 2024 ❤
She was counted as a laziest royal in 2023 and has not done anything impactful other than we’re pretty dresses. Are you stupid? She has a job to do to earn all those millions. You’re impressed quite easily. This is why that monarchy will end
What you on. She doesn't earn millions.😂😂
@irmaadams7780 that's just a blunt, made up lie. Are you not ashamed of yourself to spread misinformation like that
@@irmaadams7780 Stop forcing your narrative onto reality. lol Catherine was literally named one of Time's people of the year in the US. She's popular, viewed as kind and always supporting charitable causes. THAT monarchy is the most famous monarchy in the world.
@@irmaadams7780
Poor poor Irma. She’s jealous just like MeAgain Markle.
KC3 will do nothing. It will fall to William to clean up the mess his Uncle and brother have made. BTW Fergie did something similar when she was an active Duchess and invited an Arab actively working in terrorism to BP. The desire for money has destroyed these two men.
I agree with you! The pursuit of money has led to all sorts of problems! Thanks for watching!!
That’s what I’ve been saying. KC is a weak king .
@@oceancat0450 He is an ill king and loves his children. He begged the boys not to make his last few years terrible and Harry is doing it
@@oceancat0450don't blame the King Constitutional Monarchy he cannot unless through readings in Parliament
He can instigate it, but he won't. @@CDNCathy
They should start by taking their names away from the website, shutting down their Instagram accounts and take them out as 'Counselours of State' . I know the king wants to leave the door open for Harry and won't have the guts to cut him out of the line of successtion. But the Dukedom titles should go also. Or at least forbid them to use it in a professional capacity, like King Harald of Norway did to Märtha Louise when she tried that "The Princess and the Shaman" thing.
Exactly! Action needs to be taken! Thanks for watching!!
If I am not mistaken, the queen of Denmark did remove the titles from kids or grandchildren, KC won't do anything, he is a weak man and no back bone
H&M were forbidden to use their titles and they are using them, rules doesn't seem to be respected
The situation is more nuanced, and delicate, in reality than you allow for. Like it or not, H is the King's son, so to completely exclude him from the RF website would be a huge snub, and in PR terms - as we have seen over the last 5 years - this could be massively exploited by anti-monarchist factions. The Counsellors of State situation was immediately dealt with by KC3 in one of his first acts as monarch, by requesting Parliament to appoint Anne and Edward as additional lifetime Counsellors (Dec 2022), effectively rendering both H&A redundant. It is unfortunate that the general population of GB is largely ignorant of how their own monarchy works, constitutional speaking, and the details of such things are never reported in the media, which means that people assume that the monarch has the capacity to simply strip titles or cut individuals from LoS in some sort of petty kneejerk retribution for any perceived disobedience of disrespect from family members. Even if it were possible, it would not necessarily be advisable, in a wider sense. As a constitutional construct, the monarchy has to be seen to be above such personal squabbles and take a longer term approach. In 20 years' time, both A and H will be footnotes in history; just as Diana now is, even though she once appeared to be holding the future of the monarchy in the palm of her hand.
@@luciedupont6477I think that Henry's now wife convinced him that not using their titles ended with QEII's passing. They have started using the titles with no repercussions.
YES SOONER THAN LATER
Britanny, you are correct, priviledges come with responsibility. Both Andrew nor Hazbeen have lost their proviledge because of their horrendous behavior and lack of morals, not to mention trading off their connection to the royal family for personal fulfillment.
Feel better soon.
It's time for KC and RF to come clean concerning to 2 kids that are nonexistent and on the line of succession. It is a day late and a dollar short for this action to have taken place.
I seriously do not understand after all they have done, especially the demon he is married to, they just let it go. I get no complain, no explain, but come on now. Its beyond ridiculous
I totally agree! Take away the titles and line of succession.
Sometimes we have to let a family member go for the sake of the mental well being of the rest of the family. It's not just their behaviour, it's the unanswered questions that come with them if included. The public have a right to know.
Being a Monarch is NOT like being a normal person ... a normal parent, etc. It should be country and Kingdom first. Family is only a consideration for the sake of the continuation of the Monarchy, nothing less. Conflating being a monarch and being a father / brother is confusing the role. The subjects do not care about the monarch's brother or son. They care about where their kingdom is heading. Throughout the history of kingdoms, monarchs lose their crown ... and their heads ... when members of their family abuse their privileges. I am aghast Charles has lost that lesson. Maybe he really is too old for the role.
@@Tiglath-PileserXIX , I fear that he is complicit with what seems a deception on the public concerning who is in the 'line of succession.'
Brittany, I completely agree with you. With Andrew, he enjoys being a member of the royal family. He understands his role in the family and he understands the privilege and that comes along with it and he enjoys that. Harry is a completely different story. He has made it very, very clear that he has no intention on being a member of the royal family. He does not want to be a working royal. he and his wife and their children have no plans on ever living in the UK ever again. They are going to be Americans. For that alone, he should be stripped of everything. All titles, positions, everything should go. There’s no reason for him to have any of these things. He should just be a private citizen.
Sadly, King Charles has waited a very, very long time for his position and he does not want any controversy during his reign, so he will be leaving this mess up to King William to sort out.
Traitor H earned his nickname by lying and faking having 2 legitimate children! He has none because he had Mumps age 13, which left him sterile!
Chuck has already dragged the Monarchy down.
They are going to be Americans. For that alone he should be stripped of everything. It kinda sounds like a put down on Americans am I misunderstanding?
That could end the monarchy because of lack of action.
Prince William will have to taint his reign by cleaning up the mess King Charles caused. When Charles cheated on Diana, he should have lost the crown. Cheating goes sgainst the Church the Royals represent. The world would have been better served with Princess Ann as Queen . At 35, Prince Charles was behaving not much better then harry at 35.
King Charles needs to stop running his family through the mud. He needs to get with attorneys and shut down the gruesome twosome, as well as Andrew. Enough already.
The king has added Ann and Edward so Harry won't be asked the king as affectively taken that away without actually doing it.. THE king cannot strip their titles that has to be done by an act of Parliament why take them off the line of succession the chances of them getting near the throne is nil ( the british public would rather have a Republic than them pair as king and queen) .. and apart from anything else I think the king as his health to worry about not two child adults living in the US. We know they are full of hot air they are so jealous of catherine and william they are letting it consume their sad little lives
@@bowlingbill9633you are right, but it takes only one signature from the King to put Henry's prince title away. That would give enough nod to the Parliament to start the process of removing dukedom and other titles. Henry already denanunced his titles, especially prince title and that was five years ago in the conference where he said he doesn't want to be prince harry. He said I want to be called Just Harry. On this ground the King has a right to make a first step. Maybe that would help Just Harry to start living and earn living . It is obvious that his anger and hate comes from the titles, he saw them as a distraction. Just Harry, we all are Just Trying To Help You 😉
There is TOO much on King Charles to have him oust anyone given his own abysmal behaviors; a full relationship, plenty of photos with Jimmy Saville, the most prolific pedo in UK history. Saville, given posts of great power by Prince Charles and Queen Elizabeth II. Charles giving Mahfouz Marei Mubarak bin Mahfouz honorary Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire (CBE) title for CASH. Having an affair entire time he was married. There is likely FAR more, those two nitwits Andy and Harry are NOT going anywhere, or WE are going to find out ALL the dirt. Full Stop.
I believe the late queen knew what a detriment Charles was and that's why she never abdicated even tho she was in her 90s .
@@shamaal123The Late Queen was never going to abdicate because of the abdication crisis of 1936, and because she dedicated herself to a life of service to her realm, for her whole life.
Agree completely. I have warmed to KC over the years but this is hands down the biggest mistake of his reign ignoring his treacherous son’s abhorrent and ongoing behavior. Prince William should not have to clean this mess up because KC doesn’t have the spine to.
Well said
Totally agree!
The King has not ignored the behavior, he cut Harry out of all communciation, he kicked him out of Frogmore, he has not granted him any leeway from the decisions of the Sandringham Summit with himself, the late Queen and Prince William. At this point everyone knows that Andrew is out and so is Harry.
Being a King also means being able to make hard decisions ... and not being such a woss when a family members puts the Royal reputation into disrepute.
@@Tiglath-PileserXIX If you think KC is a "woss", why does it matter to you? I do not think the RF's reputation is in anyway is in disrepute. I think they are doing a fantastic job of this transition forward.
Andrew and Fergie have always been grifters.
... and Harry and Meghan are learning from the best ....
They ALL are.
In my opinion, the longer the Royal Family will keep putting off the removal of those titles as well as removing them from the line of succession, the more reputational damage will be done to the monarchy.
I am not a Monarchist and frankly do not mind seeing the British Monarchy go away. Having said that, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the immediate Royal Family members. They are a truly hard working and sincere bunch. It is the Hangers On and the Cling Ons, like the Sussexes and the Yorks, that I detest. They have no role to play in the modern Royal Family yet they crave all the entitlements and privileges. if the Crown is to survive it really ought to remove these parasites, or they will cause more reputational damage. That is how past monarchies collapsed.
Excellent comment, I agree completely!
💯 Absolutely 💯 correct 💯💯💯
Harry has turned out to be such a small man.
A small man with a small brain ....
Not a man at all.
No, he was always a small petty spoiled spiteful jealous little boy and he still us
Person, LET'S not insult all the men who ARE men.
Manchild
I am a American but I think the monarchy should have to put country above family, I know that is hard, but the very reason it should be in place... then you should resign....If you are not strong enough to do that, they have two bad eggs bring down their loyalty to the people!!!
Exactly! Being a Monarch is NOT like being a normal person ... a normal parent, etc. It should be country and Kingdom first. Family is only a consideration for the sake of the continuation of the Monarchy, nothing less. Conflating being a monarch and being a father / brother is confusing the role. The subjects do not care about the monarch's brother or son. They care about where their kingdom is heading. Throughout the history of kingdoms, monarchs lose their crown ... and their heads ... when members of their family abuse their privileges. I am aghast Charles has lost that lesson. Maybe he really is too old for the role.
WELL SAID! He would allow Harry to kiII people in front of a crowd and Charles would still bail him out & spend millions of tax-payer dollars on him, simply cause Harry is his "darling boy." The monarchy has proven they aren't fit to lead! The citizens are always last!
Have you spoken to your president elect lately?
@@Tiglath-PileserXIX You seem to be unaware that KC3 has only been monarch, and therefore in any position to do anything, for just over 2 years. And leaving that aside, the role of the British monarch is not to 'lead' the kingdom, except in the nominal sense, as head of state. The monarch reigns, but does not rule - Parliament wields the actual power. And leaving THAT aside also, it is entirely arguable that, by not indulging in personal petty kneejerk responses such as stripping titles, etc, both QE2 and KC3 have indeed been putting the monarchy, country and state above mere family concerns. By resisting any personal revenge impulses, they are demonstrating that the monarchy and thus the state is above such relatively trivial personal issues. Stripping titles from errant minor royals might be seen as satisfying, but in a longer term constitutional/political sense it is an irrelevant and unnecessary waste of Parliament's valuable time, and whilst some might argue that it shows 'strength' for the monarch to smite ungrateful minor royals, others would use it as a PR opportunity to show him/her as an oppressive tyrant.
In this day and age, the title means nothing if a prince behaves like a common criminal, if a prince lies and frauds and demeans, belittles, his own family. In this day and age, people will not bow to such poor examples of leadership, nor should the people finance traitors and thieves.
For someone who was raised by two very strong parents I’m surprised KC3 is as weak as he is. He continues to allow his miserable spiteful son and narcissistic daughter-in law to continue to make a mockery of the RF. Everyone blames Thomas Markle’s parenting style for the way Rachel turned out but KC3 does the same thing with Harold. These two have never faced consequences for their actions and until drastic action is taken NOTHING will change!
King Charles is not weak. He's worried that if he was to take everything from Harry, he will end himself. He is a drug addict and mentally unstable so I can understand where he's coming from. Removing titles has bigger implications on all members of the royal family as well. Lady C has explained that numerous times. I can't stand Harry so please don't think I'm defending him, it's just as a parent, I can understand how difficult it is.
very true. its amazing how weak KC is considering the strength his parents had. maybe he vowed to not be like them. look how that turned out. lol.
So tell me, complete with verifiable facts, what, under protocol and the law, that King Charles can do?
I would LOVE to see Harry lose his titles of “Duke” and “Prince” . They should be removed from the LOS . However , The King is not being weak . Harry was born a Prince , he was not elected nor gained his titles . If you remove one Princes title it sets a precedent that ALL royal titles from any /all of the Royals can be removed . It would be a danger for the Monarchy , they would leave the door open for any socialist Government to abolish The Monarchy . Charles has to tread a careful path . I do agree that Royal children in the LOS should be educated and resident in the UK by law .
Agree
Yes it’s time to clear the decks and clean the house . The Dukes of Hazard ( as someone put it) got to fade out !
That comedy will only end when Prince William ascends the throne. He’ll do something about it.
Agreed. But it's spineless off Charles to leave it to William.
Doubt it... but the monarchy is now an international laughing stock, so he would be too late anyway.
@@MeAndAbby1such a great point! I've said from the beginning of his reign that he was weak & apathetic, he is Harry's doormat. He's allowed H&M to become what they've become today by not doing the right thing and holding them accountable!
Sadly, William will pay hell from his detractors as a vindictive, mean spirited brother. King Charles needs to work with parliament to remove the titles, and have definite DNA proof of the legitimacy of Harry’s children, and remove them from the line of succession. The Dukedom was given in good faith by the Queen wishing, probably against her better judgement, to honor Harry. Hoping for the best with the worst standing right before her, was her only alternative. But, I believe deep down Her Majesty knew megan was poison. 🙏
@@TJ-um8ce Who is laughing? Please explain.
At this summit, Princes William and Edward and Princess Anne need to sit down and have a firm talk with King Charles. Tell him as parents and siblings they get they don't want to close that final door to a child/sibling. BUT Harry and Andrew are ruining the Monarchy and Harry and MeMe is making a mockery of what real Royals are. The titles need to go. I would tell them that when they send that plan to remove titles, they are releasing a statement and calling Harry at the same time. The statement needs to be clear that titles are a promise that the royals are servants to the people of the UK and Commonwealth. That as family they are always welcome, as royals they are done. As this statement is given to the public, someone (I vote Princess Anne) is on the phone to Harry and MeMe saying that their misinformation/attacks/lies are done and if they continue this, more so after titles are removed, lawyers will be involved.
Thank you, agreed. I'm American and really respected and honored Queen Elizabeth. I respected the Monarchy. But since harry and meghan it seems the Monarchy isn't respecting itself, so it is losing respect of the people. How can they allow this public flogging for so long and do nothing? Where are their standards and dignity? Pretty sad.
Why are they being flogged for maintaining their dignity? Just because they are not doing what dos not mean they deserve a flogging. Leave them alone to run their family as they choose FGS!
If things keep going the way they are, I don't think it looks good for the Monarchy! The two 'SPARES' are slowly chipping away at the credibility of the Royal Family. and, with so much being swept under the carpet so to speak, by the Royal family of the bad behaviour of those two (three countig MMarkel), both in the past and in the present,.. people are slowly going to turn against the Royal Family, and the Monarchy will eventually collapse. I even think that Harry is so twisted with jealousy, bitterness for imagined offenses, and rage that he is bent on destroying his own family and the Monarchy.
I completely agree with you that KC needs to make the tough decision to remove titles and counselor of state since they are no longer working as Royals. Harry & M & kids arent even living in England. They in no way represent the Monarchy. KC by not taking action comes off as looking weak and people lose respect for him and the crown.
It is also concerning that an heir to the throne used a property belonging to a Russian in Canada plus purchased a house which also belonged to a Russian. The fake royal tours to corrupt officials in Nigeria and now Colombia are extremely alarming! This two do not have any sort of realistic understanding of the threats they pose or how they can be used against the monarchy and Britain and are a definite security threat!
The royal family should hire you as a consultant. This was really good advice.
On what authority?
I think Queen Elizabeth was to sick and to tired in the end to make those tough decisions!!
and they all took advantage of that Charles included imho
You’re 100% correct. Why can’t KC put country & the Monarch as the focus of his reign?
Titles and LoS must go through Parliament
Yes, but King Charles should request and initiate the process.@@CDNCathy
@@CDNCathy He's a King and he should act like one. Otherwise what is the point of being a King.
I feel K C has not got too long on this earth. There has been rumors that Prince William is ready to take over .
Lets see what 2025 brings .
If any of us regular people would've done a fraction of what Harry or Andrew did, we would be UNDER the prison! The monarchy is a JOKE & a massive disappointment.
The king needs to take care of Harry and Andrew before William has to step in to do it. It shouldn't be left up to William, who I am sure would kick them out in a heartbeat but that is really not his responsibility to discipline a brother and uncle.
It doesn't really matter who deals with these renegade princes. Charles and / or William really ought to act like Kings or they will have no Kingdom to reign over.
Strange logic. If it isn't William's 'responsibility' to discipline a brother, then how is it KC3's, either?
@@Tiglath-PileserXIX This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how the British monarchy works and what power the monarch does and does not have. The monarch can do little of his or her own volition, without Parliamentary approval and/or action. Parliament's time is both valuable and limited, and it therefore only acts on situations which it perceives as political imperatives or requiring urgent evasive action. The activities of H and A, whilst embarrassing and annoying, currently do not constitute any sort of actual emergency, whilst the potential dangers of overreacting and provoking a media/PR backlash means that a 'steady as she goes' approach is almost always going to be the one adopted.
I still can't believe the late Queen let h & m keep their titles after the sandringham summit. She had to know markle would commercialize them almost immediately.
I do not think a monarch can take the Prince title away, if she did take back the Duke and Duchess title Meghan would then use Harry`s Prince title she would be known as Princess Henry, but we all know she would call herself Princess Meghan.
QE2 gave them a year to make up their minds as to whether their new venture was what they wanted. She gave them a chance - they blew it. She died.
She didn't 'let' them keep the titles. If they are to be taken away, Parliament must act first, so don't slag off on our Queen.;
And how would that have looked? The late Queen could hardly punish them for things they might very probably do, but hadn't done yet, could she? She told them not to use their HRH privilege for commercial purposes, and not to blatantly merch their royal connections, and she trusted them to keep to their word, because that was all she could reasonably do, at that time.
@@rileyperkins2724- She handed out titles like candy...
Brittany, you need to further look into the Harkles' involvement with Betterup. Something is shady with that "coaching app", and what does Harry know anyway?
Right? A drug addict, a drunk and a delusional mental case playing at life coaching. What a scam!
Everything is shady with whatever H is up to, but it's not the King's place to interfere. H is 40 yrs old.
Sidley Twins just did an episode on Better Up & apparently GB News also discussed this very recently
Excellent analogy, Brittany. Most people absolutely agree with you!😊😊😊
King Charles doesn’t like confrontation. That’s why nothing has ever been done.
Spineless. Leaving the mess for Prince William.
@@MeAndAbby1 Just like the Queen left for KC too handle. Quit blaming KC and calling him weak. KC was King one year before contracting cancer and his plates been extremely full since the Queen died; so give the man a break.
WEAK ... should not be a King.
Charles is weak and apathetic... it's opened my eyes to what a joke the monarchy truly is.
Sorry he is ill but if a King cannot make the tough decisions then he should step down. I suspect he is afraid to do anything to Harry due to Harry's poor mental state. KC was already blamed (unjustly I must add) for the death of his wife, maybe he fears being blamed again if Harry decides to .....
In the old days it was called treason, and they lost their heads. In modern times, they have to think of something else. But there does need to be something.
Harry has gone out of his way to embarrass and damage the monarchy...he is vengeful and malicious. Andrew has done damage because of his sense of entitlement and his lust but has always had the deepest respect for the monarchy and revered and loved his late parents. Two entirely different situations here. Harry is a loose cannon, Andrew is harming nothing.
Problem is he was cavorting with a Chinese spy. Anyone affiliated with that mess has to also answer.
Prince Andrew should have been removed from the line of succession and a new Letters Patent drawn up showing the only line is through Prince William and Princess Catherine.
I agree. Unfortunately Charles is Weak. A Ditherer of the first order.
A comment which demonstrates the level of ignorance that most people unfortunately have about how the British monarchy and constitution is set up.
We all agree, but doubtful it will happen 😕
If only the Powers That Be in the Palace would watch this. Brittany, you make so much sense. ❤️
You are 100 percent right!!!
It wasn’t just Andrew who was friendly with him he was close to 2 ex prime ministers but not a word about them
As much as I detest Andrew, this is all a ploy to keep the attention away from the former Tory PMs.
Princess Anne should teach classes on how Spares should act.
The "Spares" would not pay attention in class and would receive a failing grade in the class. Why should Princess Anne waste her time on them? She is already the hardest working royal in the Monarchy!
Anne was not the Spare, she is now 17th or 19th in line of succession.
Her three brothers and their children and their children's children out rank her.
@@kerrylennox7359 she was a spare! There is a wide gap in age between her and Andrew. So she was spare until Andrew was born.
@glzgowlass
Ok, yes I see your point.
I wish she had more say in what goes on. And I wish she were in the LoS.
Feel better Brittany
Thank you!!
It's honestly not a good look for them to not hold their members to account. Feels like the awful examples don't suffer real consequences. They should be removed from the LOS in my opinion. They don't represent anyone but themselves now.
I am not a Monarchist and frankly do not mind seeing the British Monarchy go away. Having said that, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the immediate Royal Family members. They are a truly hard working and sincere bunch. It is the Hangers On and the Cling Ons, like the Sussexes and the Yorks, that I detest. They have no role to play in the modern Royal Family yet they crave all the entitlements and privileges. if the Crown is to survive it really ought to remove these parasites, or they will cause more reputational damage. That is how past monarchies collapsed.
I absolutely agree! I am disgusted and embarrassed for the U.S. that NY is bending the knee for this entitled, whiney brat!
Your channel and content are fun. But you also make points and arguments really intelligently and effectively. And this is one of your very best. So much so that I hope it will reach the British Royal Family. I love the British Royal Family. And have hated to see the damage done by Andrew and Harry. Your suggestion regarding a solution similar to Sweden and additional points you’ve made here are fair and straightforward.
BTW…your voice sounds very cool. But am sorry you might not be feeling a hundred percent. I’ve had a sinus infection that progressed into bronchitis….for almost a month. Very frustrating.
Thank you again Brittany
Thank you so much!! I’m so glad you like it! Yes, you can definitely hear my cold a bit in my voice. Hopefully, I’ll get better soon. And yes, I think these changes could easily be made and are simple and direct. Thanks for watching!!
His title us not valid in the US. No one should refer to him as such. He is Harry Windsor, Harry Sussex or Harry Assxole. Not prince or duke.
As well as Harry and Andrew, king Charles needs to strip Kier Starmer of his role as prime minister.
He cannot do that. Starmer was lawfully elected.
well said brittany. I hope it happens. it's so much healthier for them. blessings.
My final comment, the Royal Family (via counselors of state or line of succession) had no control over King Edward and his plan to marry Wallis Simpson. It was Parliament that finally forced the abdication. The issue was never the marriage, Parliament feared the King's relationship with Hitler, that is why the abdication was forced. Parliament can remove Andrew and Harry from the line of succession and as counselors of state, they have removed a King from the throne.
Counsellors of State is a non-issue. As soon as he became monarch, KC3 requested Parliament to appoint Anne and Edward as additional lifetime CoS, effectively as replacements for Andrew and H. This came into effect in December 2022. So there is no question that either A or H will ever called upon to act. Line of Succession is a non-issue also: the only responsibility that is intrinsically linked to LoS is that the top 6 are automatically eligible to be CoS and to act as potential Regent. As shown, the CoS situation has been neutralised for A & H already, and the Regent situation could be similarly dealt with should it ever become necessary - but at present, there is no need to go there, because William, as heir, is an adult and in no need of a Regent. Should he become King whilst George is still a minor, then legislation would be immediately drawn up to ensure the appointment of a suitable Regent, should he need one - the same was done in 1953 when QE2 became Queen, when both her children were under age. Actually removing either A or H from LoS is otherwise both irrelevant and unnecessary. Neither is realistically ever likely to be in a position to accede to the Crown, and if by mischance that ever did come about, Parliament could, and doubtless would, take evasive action. But until then, it would be a waste of valuable and limited Parliamentary time to address something so unlikely ever to be an actual issue, especially given the constitutional difficulties involved.
I totally agree, Brittany! 🇨🇦
Why does the parliament keep turning the blind eye on this misbehavior??? When a lymph is going rotten you remove it, you dont just turn the blind eye until it is too late...🤔
I agree that they can't continue ignoring bad behavior. It's gone on for centuries and we live in a different era now. It makes them all look self indulgent.
I agree with you.
The days of Allowing Public Preception & dragging the Monarchy through the Mud are done & over. Should have let go when the Queen's Reign was over. What Gets me & i still Question is: What Does Charles want his Legacy to be as King? We know what his Mother's was..but,How does he want to be remembered,etc? Some still don't like him. I like him as King But, not as The Prince of Wales under his Mother. And, Does he want Prince William to put an end to it when he comes King? Because we all get a sense of what William thinks.
I would also like to see a letters of Patten where: If you Do the things that Harry & Andrew have done along with moving out of Country. Whoever is next(In This Case Zara or Louise.) Have the options of either Become a full-time Working member or Represent the Monarchy in a certain capacity & do smaller Engaments. But, it's by Choice.
Agreed! Changes to the Letters of Patent should be made for the modern era! Thanks for watching!!
Are you stating US law or UK?
I agree with you totally.
Thank you!!
Removed from succession for sure. If titles removed only, the one that shan't be named will IMMEDIATELY put out stories calling herself princess.
When she gets publicly laughed at and not invited anywhere, which is already happening, she will realise the humiliation!
Doesn't she have a Nigerian Title already? Something like Oluwu Ooga Booga Ding Dong?
Aww, girl, you still sound so sick! I hope you get some good rest, some delicious tea and feel better soon!! ❤❤❤❤
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Thank you for the videos. They always make my day 😊
Hope you had a happy Christmas, and get over your cold. Agree that action should be taken sooner than later, depending on the results of the investigation.
Thank you Kris! I hope your recovery is going well! And yes, action needs to be taken. Hope you had a great Christmas!!
@@RoyalNewsNetworkthank you had some complications but back on track❤
Feel better, Brittany.
Harry was told that if they leave then their level of security would be lower. But he now believes he is entitled to the maximum security. He knew the security consequences of his and hers' decision to leave.
The biggest problem with H&M is that they really didn't want to leave the Monarchy, they wanted to be in but only with their own preferences. When that didn't work out, they thought they will be so missed that the public will demand their return.
When nothing of the above occurred, they got mad (in all the meanings of the word) and they still keep that attitude today.
Yes, absolutely agree. They gambled hugely on their own popularity, hoping to keep all the perks and privileges whilst jettisoning all the routine work and constitutional restrictions of being royal, and the RF called their bluff.
completely correct
I must say with both Dukes the Monarchy has taken a soft approach; and in my personal opinion they have accommodated both of them into not taking accountability. Thank you for a another video Ms. Brittany. 💙💙
Agreed! Thank you so much for your support!!
Of course H&M have had consequences. Their security pulled, Frogmore cottage gone, access to RF gone, prestige & reputation gone, perks of living as Royals gone, freebies gone.
What do they have now compared to what they wanted?
Only titles. Empty titles.
They wanted the free lifestyle perks, security, freebies etc. Basically they wanted everything that they had before plus the freedom to pursue commerce using titles so they could ADD to their situation. Instead they lost everything.
We have a saying “you go to conquer a country only to lose even your village”.
Not shedding a tear for these two.
The people (their own families) they sacrificed at the alter of their personal success. Ruthlessly at that. They played for broke and now are broke with a dead end in front of them.
Excellent, Brittany. Well argued and totally convincing. From your mouth to the King's ears.
Good to see you home! Hope you had a wonderful Christmas! Enjoyed your royal tour reporting!
That was a great video! I agree 👍👍👍
Agree with you 100% 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Andrew has nothing of value to offer a Chinese spy.
It’s more concerning that the man was associated with people in parliament.
Are you sure?
The more of these "scandals" come to light, the more I see hapless Andrew being used as deflection for wrongdoers in very high places, just as he was in the Epstein case.
Yes Henry should lose his title
Hope you had a wonderful Christmas 🎄 ❤
I don't think The Royal Family can risk changing the letters of patent with the current government in the UK.
i think Andrew hasn't been proven guilty of anything.
Happy Boxing Day!!! Hope yesterday was wonderful. Thank you for the content. Take care and have fun!!! 🤶😎🤶
Charles in not a good king, he is too weak - a good king would put his realm and his subjects before his personal feelings as a father. The Monarchy is a business - it has to be run like that, ppl would respect that
Being a Monarch is NOT like being a normal person ... a normal parent, etc. It should be country and Kingdom first. Family is only a consideration for the sake of the continuation of the Monarchy, nothing less. Conflating being a monarch and being a father / brother is confusing the role. The subjects do not care about the monarch's brother or son. They care about where their kingdom is heading. Throughout the history of kingdoms, monarchs lose their crown ... and their heads ... when members of their family abuse their privileges. I am aghast Charles has lost that lesson. Maybe he really is too old for the role.
Completely agree with you 100%
Prince William probably agrees that Harry and Andrew must be dealt with. It's a future problem that I believe is holding things back. Who would William have as working royals? Beatrice and Eugenie won't help if their father is removed. Zara is not titled, and Louise hasn't made a decision on her title, much less working as a royal.
Agreed! Charles is definitely leaving that problem to William, which is definitely not fair to him. Thanks for watching!!
Harry and Andrew are not working royals, and I believe that Beatrice and her husband would step up if asked to be working royals. Zara and Mike Tindall might as well.
Lady Louise Windsor, who is now 21, did in fact make a decision, both on taking the style (not title) of princess, for which she is technically eligible, and on being a working royal. It was a no to both. We do not know what Beatrice and Eugenie may or may not do in future. Beatrice is, technically, an approved Counsellor of State, so may be inclined to become more involved than she has been so far.
@@rasaalchemy Zara Tindall is not only not a royal, being descended through the female line, but is a very long way down the line of succession, coming in behind Zara's brother, Peter. And, as she and her husband would certainly be required to give up all their lucrative commercial interests, it is highly unlikely either that she would be invited to become a working royal, or would be tempted to do so.
@Polopony where did you read this about Lady Louise
I want to know why our Government let this Man access to Andrew. This is not only showing up Andrew but also out security departments.
Harry should no longer be on the LOS or be councillor of state. He has no knowledge of dealing with foreign dignatories and has no decorum. He is rude and crude and does not behave as a member of the royal family.
I agree that PA and PH needs to be stripped of their CoS and Line of Succession.
When the coverup of the fake kids comes out the whole house of cards will tumble down. Sheila
I agree!! For heaven sakes they done so much damage and their in their 60’s and 40’s. Everybody’s always making excuses and all that started when they turned 2 0r 3 years old!!
Apart from being known as "Randy Andy", I can't think of any REAL scandals concerning the young Andrew. And remember he was an ACTUAL helicopter pilot in an ACTUAL conflict, where even people who didn't like him as a person were full of praise for his bravery, skill and actions. Compare that with Henry's drug taking/mental therapy/naked stunts in Las Vegas/racist remarks/pretend soldiering, vexatious litigation and now all culminating in the constant attacks on his family, slandering and lying in print and on screen,
The King himself cannot remove their titles. It would take an act of Parliament. He could possibly remove the title Prince. If the Dukedom is removed. Meghan would become Princess Henry. But she would disregard that, and call herself Princess Meghan. It’s all very complicated.
I thought the king could remove the councilors of state.
Well spoken!
I agree completely. If regular families can kick a relative out for embarrassing their family, the British Royal Family should have the same option.
I agree. Unfortunately Charles is weak. And I suspect that he is aware that his son is a ret@rd who won't survive a divorce. So he is holding out just in case.
It is up to Parliament to strip Duke & Duchess titles.
Only a Working Royal can be a Counsellor of State, so Andrew, Harry & Beatrice were cut ages ago
KC sh remove titles, and succession. Also their offspring should be removed from succession also if they get removed.
Im not sure how much longer the royal family will last in the current climate of change...