Why the war is happening. They won't have enough people to secure the current borders. Russian geography is flat. Now, they can reach mountain ranges and oceans. Then they would be secure even with a small military
Thank you for your comment. It means a lot to me. I had my son born in United State. Otherwise he would be born in Russia. The same for my other friends. Can you amazing our son would be drawn to the army in Russia and would have to go to the war in Ukraine. My mom and aunt live in Ukraine. My other relatives also live in Ukraine. I love them dearly.
@@gregvanpaassen Result of inflation and High Housing Cost. Makes youth to not to make babies. Humans can afford food not high cost of living. It's fault of old grandparents to charge high prices of homes. After some time no one wants to do overtime work and shitty jobs. Burnout society and Rich getting richer.
Putin has made sure to not send “Rus” men. He sends muslims and other ethnicities. I have always believed he invaded Ukraine to absorb the Kieven Rus, the original “Russian”. The war was to solve two issues: absorb the Rus population from Ukraine and send other ethnicities to the front to in effect cleanse Russia of the non-Rus population.
They have lost 700k so far but have gained territory populated with over 2.000.0000 people. Your assumption seems to be wrong if you consider the whole picture.
@@PeterPan-ho8wv Between January 1, 2022 and January 1, 2023, the Russian population decreased by about 560,000. …if you add their losses of young men to the war of family formation age, Russia is going to have to conquer Poland, the Baltic States and several more countries just to tread water…
@@PeterPan-ho8wv Between January 1, 2022 and January 1, 2023, the Russian population decreased by about 560,000. If you add in the 500k young men lost in Ukraine who will not be forming families they’re going to have to invade quite a few more countries just to tread water demographically…
well there are always some fanatics. Imagine Magda Goebbels (probably the world greatest mom) the wife of Nazi Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels. She had six children with him (plus one from an earlier marriage). After Hitler killed himself she killed her six children and then ended her own life. So lets say no SANE person is planning a family during war.
@@Dah42 With Russia tho, I feel like the situation might be slightly different. From what I know, one of Russia's most used tactics in war is to always overwhelm the opposing side with human fodder, which has led them to having jaw-breaking casualties compared to other countries fighting the same wars (Ex: WW1 +2). If I were Russian, saw this, and knew that the country would always be embroiled in new wars every generation, I'd not have kids in Russia.
Feels like every country is screaming at everyone to have babies. Not for them to grow up and have great lives, but for those governments to have, works, soldiers, tax payers, and servents, as just cog in a machine. Maybe population collapse is the medicine we need so we understand what's truly important.
Exactly why Republicans in the U.S. are even more against abortion, even in cases of rape and incest. Some of them are even whispering about restricting birth control access. It's not "sanctity of life" they preach, they're just using Christianity and their so called "moral high ground" to really control women to birth more workers, consumers, and soldiers. Look at the lawsuit Idaho, Missouri, and Kansas GOP Attorney Generals recently filed. They're mad that lower teen pregnancies (because of abortion access to online mifepristone) are resulting in population loss, "diminishment of political representation and loss of federal funds.” They don't care about human life because if they did, they'd actually care about what happens AFTER that baby is born and the health and well-being of the mothers that carry and deliver these babies.
It actually has. Russia got several millions of "right", slavic, population on occupied territories. Slaves is extremely important, because inside russia, the birth rate is much higher in non-russian areas, then in russian. But those are mostly old people.
That’s how things work in all countries , regardless of how “feminist” they claim to be. In the past, women weren’t sent to war because it was argued that they had to stay home taking care of the kids .. Such argument doesn’t hold water anymore , since most nations are aborting their kiddos , as a result , the birth rates in most nations are extremely low .
@@ladybug3380 Do you see nothing wrong with men being forced to go to war ? I bet you would cry a river jf women were the ones sent to die in useless wars.
@@Dah42 During the USSR the Soviets had Elite Female Snipers because they believed that they had better Aim. Women have always participated in wars in the past.
I may be immoral in saying this but wouldn’t Eastern Europe and Ukraine be in a much more safe and peaceful situation if Russia’s population became as small as possible ?
of course. The smaller russia is (economically, demographically, geographically), the better for the world. Unfortunately the demographic situation is dire in almost all the developed world, and particularly so in Ukraine :(
Eastern Europe , and pretty much most countries in the world (except African nations are suffering as a result of extremely low birth rates, since most kids are aborted .. So Russia is not the only one affected by this situation.. That’s why I find it odd when people say that abortion is “good” because “the world is overpopulated”.
Worldwide problem -- nobody will have families if cannot afford property, food costs too much, college expensive and obsolete, etc. Ruling classes siphoning off national wealth at expense of middle class. Middle class is engine of growing economies. Econ 101 seems to be unfashionable these days.
If the Russian leaders were not criminals and had a freindly relationship with Europe they would be suppying the EU with resources and the people of Russia would be very prosperous. Instead they have a constant warlike attitude and the invasion of Ukrain has cost it a million people and it has lost its main market.
Ресурсов на планете становиться все меньше и решили ограбить Россию очередной раз или сократит население земли, они об этом откровенно говорят , а на Украину их плевать
Very true. Russia would be a very prosperous country if it chose to work with Europe. However, I think Putin felt like a nobody amongst Western leaders, whereas he's reveared like a king in his own country and thinks he's got world respect.
It's questionable if it's irrelevant. Haven't you heard what preceded the invasion? Or don't you want to know? And where and for what reasons have British soldiers been deployed over the last decade or two? Let me know, thanks!
Before all the Krembots start chipping in saying "Yeah well Britain and Germany are also in big trouble, so there" just remember GDP per capita in Russia is barely $14,000. This is what you get with Putin and negligible service/hospitality/tourism sectors.
GDP per capita PPP is the correct wayto look at things, not Nominal GDP per capita. UK - 62K, GERMANY - 70K, RUSSIA 47 K. Its definately not so far behind
@@AlphamanKing It's only the correct way of looking at it if you're unable to leave your own country. So I suppose that does make sense for the Russians.
One of the big problems of Russia is the catastrophic state of the rural population..many go to urban centres where housing is expensive and cramped..not an environment to start a family..Russia is caught in a downward spiral...becoming even more insignificant as a power
True, in rural Russia there's widespread poverty. Even Russia soldiers in Ukraine were shocked how rural Ukrainians lived much better than them. Running water, indoor plumbing, heating, nice well built homes etc. But the Russian elites the oligarchs will go out and buy a luxury yacht worth a billion dollars. With that money you could provide utilities to thousands of villages in Russia. It's Russia's greedy dumb leaders that are responsible.
They’re concerned because that’s meat for the grinder. When your entire military success is based on throwing people at the enemy, and you run out of fodder, you’ve lost.
"The Russian government is concerned about the catastrophic decline in the birth rate in Russia." Sounds like: "Jackals and hyenas are concerned that antelopes do not want to reproduce and be eaten."
700K dead would mean easily 2 Million or more wounded and injured beyond service. The Russian Military only has 1.15 Million active and combat ready soldiers so that could easily mean the absolute collapse of the Russian Military and it enite morale. So is Russia is fielding zombies at this point?
In Russia the death rate is 4000 a day and third of that from the war in Ukraine all the prisons in Russia are empty so they closing them down . Russia has increased its population by 4.5 million people mostly old , mothers with children and the occupied lands are bombed out cities not fit to live in an increase in population makes ordinary Russians poorer.
All of their young and middle aged men are dying fighting in a pointless invasion of a country that is not theirs. It’s shameful and an utter waste of life.
And it's not even a bad thing. We have the technology to feed and house people with less manpower spent than ever before. Less people means less competition for resources and less strain on the environment. The question is not "can we have an economy with fewer young people" but "what does the transition from constant population growth to a smaller population mean, and where does that number stabilize?" It's a harder question to answer than just "can we bully people into having kids", though. But I think the country that answers the question is the one that does best moving forward
Even if that's the case, a slower decline will be much easier to manage than a fast one. Therefore, immigration and increased birthrates are still desirable.
And how many young adults left as a result of the war in Ukraine? I’ve heard close to a million. Hard to imagine how they make up for the harm Putin had and his oligarch enablers has done to that nation.
@ it’s not though is it. If they’ve been able to capture a million people then it’s a massive net gain as even worse case estimates put the Russian losses in the 100 - 200 thousand range.
The worst estimates are 2 to 3x that number and you're getting a mostly aging population in rural Ukraine with the entire infrastructure of those regions demolished. That has to be built from scratch while under heavy sanctions. It makes zero economic or demographic sense.
These people aren't really gonna have kids and they're mostly old people as Ukraine also has a demographic issue. Factor in the economic down spiral that this war has resulted in which not only is a financial issue but makes it even more undesirable to have kids, you're really looking at a net loss.
I keep asking myself why the ones at the top are so concerned about birth rates declining… like it’s their main concern… is it just this - less peasants to work or is it more or different than just that?
The projection is a 15% decrease in Russian population by 2100. In comparison, China faces a 50% decrease by 2100. Germany also faces a 15% decline by 2100, Italy, a 40% decline. To check, search "population pyramid" of your preferred country.
Population decline is good for planet earth. It is overburdened by population and being destroyed due to over exploitation of natural resources. GDP is a bad indicator to measure progress or well being of human. What matters is GDP per capita on price parity basis and equitable distribution for well being of population. At present we see few super rich people, vast poor people and struggling middle class in most of the countries.
Counties can’t figure out how they will have people pay taxes in future due to ALL developed countries falling decline of population…growing older population to be supported as well. First they hv tried (under political guise to trick everyone) to push mass immigration from poor countries and blend the social differences, which has totally failed as seen by results of social chaos and loss of their own national identity. Now trying to ban immigration ,but too late to stop changes. Perhaps leaders should try sitting down with think tank and others to attempt to solve this tax & worker problem in a different way!! Our World is overpopulated and can’t possibly sustain more human population… get ready to change the status quo to the long term benefit of our people AND planet. We’re suppose to have vast resource of intelligence… Use it!
Retirement age should be increased. People should be prepared to work full time or part time as long as they can. Only very old physically disabled people should qualify for social security. Many of these people may not need any social security as they may have savings to sustain them. Social security may be needed by unemployed people. It is bad economic policies that leads to unemployment, lack of saving when people are earning to sustain them and this needs to be corrected. Why immigrants are needed, if population is decreasing let economic activities also decrease to sustainable levels. GDP will decrease but why it needs to increase when population is going down.
You're delusional thinking retiring will be an option even if you're a crippled old person. Just look at developing countries where old people work till they die or physically can't move. There won't be any pension money waiting for them that they themselves haven't saved up which most people haven't. This then results in a further class divide just like in those developing countries where the rich can afford to retire while the rest of us have to struggle. That is not to mention the availability of health care....
If people don't save money, when they could, why blame the Government. In India, if you have worked in government job, you get lifelong pension after retirement. If you work in organized sector, you get gratuity (15 days of last drawn salary for number of years worked) plus provident fund, which is your mandatory contribution plus employers contribution and interest accumulated. This can keep you going for rest of your life. It is only people in unorganized sectors, who do not have any such privilege. I think only such people need to be provided with old age pension from government funds.
economy in my country has been declining badly for many years now and this also caused polulation and child birth declines. so russia is not alone, ofcourse its not helping that russia have lost so many young men in pointless wars. but the unknown of the future may scare ppl, life is so expensive, its hard even to take care of one person ,so for low income families its even worse.
I was reading the other day on Al Jazeera, the Russian death toll is around 654,000, with 70,000 dead in volunteers alone. Combine that with the millions that have left the country, and the millions who will leave and you have a sizeable population decline. mind you we have around six billion too many people on the planet. so perhaps it's fate.
That makes no sense though since the Russian Military in its entirely only has 1.15 Million active and combat ready soldiers. 654K losses would mean the entire Russian Military has been defeated alongside its Navy and Air Force. That would also constitute a full absolute collapse of its Government since the Armed Forces has suffered apocaplytic losses.
I agree with the overcrowded feel. I was disgusted in Walmart this evening. It's a damn foreign slum in there, completely overrun. I want things back to less people and no foreigners. Many are very rude & invasive. I don't have children and I think I'm the one who should be getting the tax incentives!!!!! I'm helping the planet.
'War' and winning more land thereby is easier to think about and do, for the males at the top. Asking WOMEN of child bearing age: 'What' can we do to support, encourage, and enrich your life? Is too difficult. These men, from the top down, would have to change. Oh no 😮
It's not just Russia. In all of Europe. Possibly do not need to worry about climate change coming in about 100 years. That's 3 generation, during that time European race would be 20-25% of what it is now.
I don't see any problem in declining population maybe more countries could follow Russia. Just watched a film on plastic pollution in Indonesia and Jakarta is one of the most densely populated countries in the world at 70 million, the same population as UK. Every country has increasing population whether is due to migration from increasing third world populations or declining Western population due to affluence and rising debt and longer life expectancy means most women have to work now. They talk about saving the planet! from global warming! human rights! pollution! and obsession with preserving human life. But they won't talk about the real elephant in the room, world overpopulation by humans. No animal would be allowed to increase without nature controlling its numbers why should humans be any different, the problem "IS HUMANS!!". And as long as population keeps increasing wars and pestilence will preval whether it with or without weapons, the new weapon in the west is Empathy where you can invade a country by putting on a sad face and claiming asylum and they will refuse to send you back to where you came from, one thing I do know the chaos is not going to go away.
Not worried. The world population experienced an uncontrolled expansion. It's normal to expect an uncontrolled contraction. If people want stability they can not rely on half-baked measures. That's why a colony on Mars would be so important. We should set population limits on Earth based on given criteria. Rather than forcing people to have unwanted babies or look after excess numbers of old age pensioners, we send surplus people to the Mars colony.
so entire regions in Russia are depleted of every male older than 18 who will never retire from the bloodlands of Ukraine and they are worried about population decline? how about asking for an armistice instead and some studs from Africa?
@@Howiex-is8gq Lol how did your comment get published? As a very clever African (of which there are many) the soaring eagle hears not the barking of dogs
No The population decline in Russia can be attributed to four significant periods. First, during Operation Barbarossa, the USSR lost approximately 24 million people, including a substantial number of men. While the population did experience some recovery, it never fully rebounded to its previous levels. The second major factor was the decline that began in 1988, just before the collapse of the Soviet Union. This period marked the beginning of a demographic downturn that would only worsen with the eventual disintegration of the USSR, which resulted in a loss of around 25 million people, including millions of men who vanished from the population. During this time, no one was having children, and the fertility rate plummeted to around 1.6-one of the lowest in the entire world. Following the Soviet collapse, birth rates continued to decline, and by the time Vladimir Putin came to power, the demographic situation was already dire. Currently, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine represents the fourth significant demographic challenge. Yes, the war has certainly contributed to the population decline, but it is important to note that Putin is not solely to blame for this crisis. The underlying issues have deep historical roots, and the demographic decline was inevitable, whether Moscow liked it or not.
I am an African and in Africa not having a child is a disaster for a many women. The husband and his family will tell these unlucky women that they will marry another wife. Then there is the issue of gender. A boy is revered in Africa and I'd you keep having daughters, it becomes a problem. So in Africa the fertility rates are so high and culture and society pressures will keep it that way. 6:51
Well, first thing to do is to tell women that they can be independent on their own and basically men are a huge hassle and not worth it... and men aren't as smart as they profess to be.
That's pretty similar to attitudes in, for example, China until a few decades ago and India until very recently, and yet they are also expecting demographic issues (China sooner than India of course). That is likely the future of Subsaharan Africa as well, assuming development increases (so, dependent on country -- Zambia will likely decrease faster than CAR).
Ironic that the concern over the once dreaded "population bomb" is now reversed into a fear about what population decline could mean for capitalism and national security in many societies. A perfect storm of global environmental collapse, global political chaos and contemporary attitudes of abject self-interest make avoiding children an increasingly reasonable decision. Russia is not alone with this issue.
The refurbishment of a company of T-72 tanks costs about as much as building a hospital and 2 schools from scratch. But hey, who needs all that malarkey when "the motherland needs you"😂
Becoming a parent makes you vulnerable. I can't recommend it in this day and age. Let the war mongers themselves produce new soldiers and let oligarchs, shareholders and CEO's produce their own workers. Let's stop catering them.
Возможно, но у нас была низкая рождаемость и до войны тоже. И да, пропаганда рождаемости была даже до войны, льготы, богусы, выплаты, помощь, и очень много всякого бреда. Мы просто не хотим детей
"The Russian government is concerned about the catastrophic decline in the birth rate in Russia." Sounds like: "Jackals and hyenas are concerned that antelopes do not want to reproduce and be eaten."
I think governments worried about this are missing a huge piece of the puzzle. Yes, financial help is good, but people are worried about TIME. If the state provided 24/7 nannies or nurseries, that would make a huge difference.
US, Russia, and Europe, all of it is going down the hole. There's no replacement or fertility rate, some are nearing the apocalpytic levels of South Korea and Japan. No one is having kids and all of there populations are shrinking. Europe and North America might not have that long within a few generations down the line. Did we just reach the apex of Human world population number?
Its a developed world issue. The asset owners take every penny of a workers wage with permanent price rises. It makes it unaffordable for native citizens to have enough children.
This is true, however every country will become developed in time. There are only few truly undeveloped countries in africa. And they lead the world in birthrate. Seeing as every country will eventually develop that means this is a problem that should be addressed. If we dont, at best we would only lose benefits like pensions etc along with higher taxes. At worst economic collapse as the country loses its workforce rapidly until equillibrium.
China will not allow that many to move and Russia does not have the economy to draw immigrants from South Asia like europe north america and the middle east do.
Дума найдет выход, чтобы овцы порадовали волков. Слабый всегда будет служить сильному. В то время как сильный должен есть слабого. «Сильные делают то, что могут, а слабые терпят то, что происходит». История Пелопоннесской войны Фукидида. Кто найдет очевидный, но заросший путь в истории, тот и унаследует землю.
Maybe the lower population is a good thing, especially since the larger population tends to abuse the environment to meet its stabilization requirement demands. Never in history have 1st world countries had to worry about clean water for survival. Once the costs of foods decline to a livable amount, we still will have the issue of proper levels of clean water to sustain ourselves, especially when we refuse to reduce, properly dispose of, remove all together known yet legal (in percentages) pollutants, synthetic materials (leading to microplastics), etc. We are ruining our standing on the first mandate God gave us. We are supposed to rule and care of the gift (the earth) he gave us.
Russis has more women of age over 40 than man. Look at the demographic pyramid. China has more men below age of 45..50. So... Technically you're offering chinese man age of 30 marry russian woman age 50. Okay)
It must be in your country how illegals get stuff for free, there is no such thing in Russia and Russians themselves will make sure to put immigrants in place if something will go against Russian citizens. Whole Europe cries and whines and let their streets to be taken and women to be raped, Russians will make sure to show who is the tsar on the soil!
A bonkers solution? Surely that is the one that will solve that problem. The real problem stems from WWII when many young males were killed or sent to the gulags, and not procreating. Leaving a dip in the male bread winner population which repeats with little diminution every 25 years. Putin's mad gamble and his army's inadequacy has added yet another, 25 year cycle of less males. But apart from the mad gamble of capitalism to hitch a reliance on an expanding populace - why should a falling population be harmful? Go on - tell me.
A falling population is harmful to heavily socialized or communist economies because there are fewer young people to pay for supporting the older people. No one to work to pay for the care of the elders. And of course a falling population is bad for Russia in particular who has historically relied on a disposable peasant population to expand and defend its resources and territory. And so far russia has never shown an interest in a different strategy (Ie, diplomatic relations.)
@@youtubename7819 The improvements in healthcare mean that nominal retirement age of 65 produces fit and healthy "old" people in greater numbers. And certainly in the UK the retirement age for state pensions is rising, in response. Plus a lot of charitable endeavours are staffed by retired people, and the government rely on that so they don't have to provide. A falling population is not, of itself, a problem. Failure to adapt is. Immigration is the de facto solution, and Europe & the US are fighting it - unsuccessfully. The alternative is more people, more pollution, climate change and societal collapse. You choose? Have a nice day.
Why is the reduction of population a bad thing? By the end of this century, it's safely to assume that with the AI advancement, 99.9% of current human jobs can be done by AI. AI labor will be abundant, but natural resources will always be limited, and even more so in the future. So what does Russia or any country need heavy population for? Contribute nothing but consume the very limited natural resources.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Ironic - Killing so many young men in a pointless war
It has always been the same in Russia and USSR.
Why didn’t you say that in George w bush illegal war in Iraq that killed 1 million people
Why the war is happening. They won't have enough people to secure the current borders. Russian geography is flat. Now, they can reach mountain ranges and oceans. Then they would be secure even with a small military
But they don’t send ethnically Rus men, they send muslims and other ethnicities.
@@rodmarker2071 love how my comments are deleted
If I was a woman of childbearing age in Russia, I would leave. My babies will not become war fodder.
A lot of women left and leaving. I left 32 years ago. The country is crazy.
@@kirav2536 Glad you got out.
Thank you for your comment. It means a lot to me. I had my son born in United State. Otherwise he would be born in Russia. The same for my other friends. Can you amazing our son would be drawn to the army in Russia and would have to go to the war in Ukraine. My mom and aunt live in Ukraine. My other relatives also live in Ukraine. I love them dearly.
Even if he were to make a law saying every woman has to have a child it would not matter. Their is a shortage of men in Russia now.
@@missp6983 Putin the despot is sanctioning the act of rape on Russian women. Men will see Putin’s decree as an ‘open season’ on females of any age.
Over 3-million of their most intelligent people have fled!
They have been leaving for years now. theres 1st gen Russian americans that speak english, spanish, and russian. Ive met them.
@@hectorsanchez1377agreed, in my community, we had a growth of Russian Orthodox over the last 40 years. Good people
Yes they will become more Idiocracy as a result worshipping kgb putin as their "god" it's sickening
All the intelligent ones have left, the rest are orcs
Бежали трусы и предатели. Такие же как вы, без родины, чести и мужества Умные все на месте.
The wolves are unhappy the sheep aren’t having enough lambs.
This is valid, but also old sheep will have no lambs to look after them.
@@gregvanpaassen Result of inflation and High Housing Cost. Makes youth to not to make babies. Humans can afford food not high cost of living. It's fault of old grandparents to charge high prices of homes. After some time no one wants to do overtime work and shitty jobs. Burnout society and Rich getting richer.
billionares - wolves
people - sheeps
the call to eat insects is as much their idea
The US and EU are investing a lot of money in this war.
It's the shepherds the sheep should worry about, wolves will take stragglers one at a time, shepherds eat almost every lamb born every year.
Maybe don’t waste resources on invading other countries and invest them on improving peoples lives
Import from India, I am unhappy here , no opportunity or job
Sweden, Denmark and Norway provide good services and are still below replacement level
@@jonathanayres6005 Sweden, Denmark and Norway have total fertility rate around 1,5. Russian total fertility rate is around 0,5.
I couldn't agree more.
There’s a thought. (That would never cross Putin’s mind)
The loss of 300,000 young men of child-rearing age is going to have long term impact on demographics....
Putin has made sure to not send “Rus” men. He sends muslims and other ethnicities. I have always believed he invaded Ukraine to absorb the Kieven Rus, the original “Russian”. The war was to solve two issues: absorb the Rus population from Ukraine and send other ethnicities to the front to in effect cleanse Russia of the non-Rus population.
700k. So far.
They have lost 700k so far but have gained territory populated with over 2.000.0000 people. Your assumption seems to be wrong if you consider the whole picture.
@@PeterPan-ho8wv Between January 1, 2022 and January 1, 2023, the Russian population decreased by about 560,000. …if you add their losses of young men to the war of family formation age, Russia is going to have to conquer Poland, the Baltic States and several more countries just to tread water…
@@PeterPan-ho8wv Between January 1, 2022 and January 1, 2023, the Russian population decreased by about 560,000. If you add in the 500k young men lost in Ukraine who will not be forming families they’re going to have to invade quite a few more countries just to tread water demographically…
No one is planning a family during a war…would send your kids to war ???
Especially for Putin’s dictatorship.
well there are always some fanatics. Imagine Magda Goebbels (probably the world greatest mom) the wife of Nazi Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels. She had six children with him (plus one from an earlier marriage). After Hitler killed himself she killed her six children and then ended her own life. So lets say no SANE person is planning a family during war.
The reality is that most nations have extremely low birth rates, this has little to do with war, but with babies being contracepted or aborted.
@@Dah42yeah but if loads of men have been killed, then there is just as many spinsters who will bear no babies
@@Dah42 With Russia tho, I feel like the situation might be slightly different. From what I know, one of Russia's most used tactics in war is to always overwhelm the opposing side with human fodder, which has led them to having jaw-breaking casualties compared to other countries fighting the same wars (Ex: WW1 +2). If I were Russian, saw this, and knew that the country would always be embroiled in new wars every generation, I'd not have kids in Russia.
Feels like every country is screaming at everyone to have babies. Not for them to grow up and have great lives, but for those governments to have, works, soldiers, tax payers, and servents, as just cog in a machine. Maybe population collapse is the medicine we need so we understand what's truly important.
Exactly why Republicans in the U.S. are even more against abortion, even in cases of rape and incest. Some of them are even whispering about restricting birth control access. It's not "sanctity of life" they preach, they're just using Christianity and their so called "moral high ground" to really control women to birth more workers, consumers, and soldiers. Look at the lawsuit Idaho, Missouri, and Kansas GOP Attorney Generals recently filed. They're mad that lower teen pregnancies (because of abortion access to online mifepristone) are resulting in population loss, "diminishment of political representation and loss of federal funds.” They don't care about human life because if they did, they'd actually care about what happens AFTER that baby is born and the health and well-being of the mothers that carry and deliver these babies.
E X A C T L Y
They ARE!
Exactly. We need to go back to the time when the world population was 1 billion.
This just means we won’t be able to retire
Exactly ! they just want cash cows and machine gun fodder
Hmmm, I wonder if waging a pointless war has anything to do with it? 🤔
Russian leadership doesn't think it's pointless. Evidently the people do not as well.
It actually has. Russia got several millions of "right", slavic, population on occupied territories. Slaves is extremely important, because inside russia, the birth rate is much higher in non-russian areas, then in russian. But those are mostly old people.
@Unknown_things_happened Not getting the meaning of your comment, at all.
@@Unknown_things_happenedexplain it further
If I was a child bearing age and lived in Russia I wouldn’t have children at all.
Worried about demographics but threatening nuclear war... makes sense for Putin, I suppose.
he's just a crazy dictator.
Stop sending men to war
That’s how things work in all countries , regardless of how “feminist” they claim to be. In the past, women weren’t sent to war because it was argued that they had to stay home taking care of the kids .. Such argument doesn’t hold water anymore , since most nations are aborting their kiddos , as a result , the birth rates in most nations are extremely low .
What’s that going to solve?
@@ladybug3380 Do you see nothing wrong with men being forced to go to war ? I bet you would cry a river jf women were the ones sent to die in useless wars.
Yea send all the lesbian empowered feminists who think they’re men!
@@Dah42 During the USSR the Soviets had Elite Female Snipers because they believed that they had better Aim. Women have always participated in wars in the past.
No soldiers for that war monger.
They have lots of boys to fight for their warring aggression.
Same for Ukraine
@argusburebistus8602
All Russia has to do is leave. Putin is just another Soviet era fascist war monger. Get out!
@argusburebistus8602 Ukraine has to fight for its survival, edgelord
no meat for the frontlines🤷🏼♂️
I may be immoral in saying this but wouldn’t Eastern Europe and Ukraine be in a much more safe and peaceful situation if Russia’s population became as small as possible ?
Why do you think we Poles are helping Ukraine?😊
of course. The smaller russia is (economically, demographically, geographically), the better for the world. Unfortunately the demographic situation is dire in almost all the developed world, and particularly so in Ukraine :(
Eastern Europe , and pretty much most countries in the world (except African nations are suffering as a result of extremely low birth rates, since most kids are aborted .. So Russia is not the only one affected by this situation.. That’s why I find it odd when people say that abortion is “good” because “the world is overpopulated”.
@@Dah42 where did you get the idea that "most kids are aborted"?
@@Dah42 who says so? Some weird friends you have
Might be an idea to stop throwing it’s young men into the mincing machine that is Ukraine..
Worldwide problem -- nobody will have families if cannot afford property, food costs too much, college expensive and obsolete, etc. Ruling classes siphoning off national wealth at expense of middle class. Middle class is engine of growing economies. Econ 101 seems to be unfashionable these days.
The best Russia can do to the world is to continue this demographic trend.
Fully agreed!
It’s a joke in rich countries we have to choose between having a comfortable life or have kids.
If the Russian leaders were not criminals and had a freindly relationship with Europe they would be suppying the EU with resources and the people of Russia would be very prosperous. Instead they have a constant warlike attitude and the invasion of Ukrain has cost it a million people and it has lost its main market.
Ресурсов на планете становиться все меньше и решили ограбить Россию очередной раз или сократит население земли, они об этом откровенно говорят , а на Украину их плевать
Very true. Russia would be a very prosperous country if it chose to work with Europe. However, I think Putin felt like a nobody amongst Western leaders, whereas he's reveared like a king in his own country and thinks he's got world respect.
"Give me children and I shall give you more blood" ~ Czar Putin-1.
A bunch of bitter grandpas sending their few grandsons to war to die over an irrelevant strip of territory in Ukraine…pathetic!
It's questionable if it's irrelevant. Haven't you heard what preceded the invasion? Or don't you want to know?
And where and for what reasons have British soldiers been deployed over the last decade or two? Let me know, thanks!
@@jansoltes971 Please, do enlighten us.
its not irrelevant, theres trillions worth of natural resources on the ukrainian lands. in the end, its always about the money.
@@shikharacc1543it doesn’t make it relevant when you see the price that population has to pay.
@@shikharacc1543 Those resources mean nothing when you have nobody to extract, refine, and buy said resources.
Before all the Krembots start chipping in saying "Yeah well Britain and Germany are also in big trouble, so there" just remember GDP per capita in Russia is barely $14,000. This is what you get with Putin and negligible service/hospitality/tourism sectors.
The baltics and Finland have huge demographic problems, even worst than Russia and barely a number of migrants as near
Yeah not dazzled
Gaza has a birthrate of over 4 per woman. Explain that away with economics and security.
GDP per capita PPP is the correct wayto look at things, not Nominal GDP per capita. UK - 62K, GERMANY - 70K, RUSSIA 47 K. Its definately not so far behind
@@AlphamanKing It's only the correct way of looking at it if you're unable to leave your own country. So I suppose that does make sense for the Russians.
One of the big problems of Russia is the catastrophic state of the rural population..many go to urban centres where housing is expensive and cramped..not an environment to start a family..Russia is caught in a downward spiral...becoming even more insignificant as a power
True, in rural Russia there's widespread poverty. Even Russia soldiers in Ukraine were shocked how rural Ukrainians lived much better than them. Running water, indoor plumbing, heating, nice well built homes etc.
But the Russian elites the oligarchs will go out and buy a luxury yacht worth a billion dollars. With that money you could provide utilities to thousands of villages in Russia. It's Russia's greedy dumb leaders that are responsible.
That's right.
They’re concerned because that’s meat for the grinder. When your entire military success is based on throwing people at the enemy, and you run out of fodder, you’ve lost.
"The Russian government is concerned about the catastrophic decline in the birth rate in Russia." Sounds like: "Jackals and hyenas are concerned that antelopes do not want to reproduce and be eaten."
Who wants to raise kids to be fed to the war machine?
700k casualty does not help.
700K dead would mean easily 2 Million or more wounded and injured beyond service.
The Russian Military only has 1.15 Million active and combat ready soldiers so that could easily mean the absolute collapse of the Russian Military and it enite morale.
So is Russia is fielding zombies at this point?
In Russia the death rate is 4000 a day and third of that from the war in Ukraine all the prisons in Russia are empty so they closing them down . Russia has increased its population by 4.5 million people mostly old , mothers with children and the occupied lands are bombed out cities not fit to live in an increase in population makes ordinary Russians poorer.
Russia is a 3rd world country.
And yet they feed the meat grinder with their own people....
Stop war!
All of their young and middle aged men are dying fighting in a pointless invasion of a country that is not theirs. It’s shameful and an utter waste of life.
No babies and probably a lot of young crippled men coming back from the war. Can’t be good for any country.
The whole world really needs to start planning for a much lower population future. Stop thinking immigration is the long term solution.
The non-bolshevik west is free to put an end to poverty. And fertility will increase again.
And it's not even a bad thing. We have the technology to feed and house people with less manpower spent than ever before. Less people means less competition for resources and less strain on the environment. The question is not "can we have an economy with fewer young people" but "what does the transition from constant population growth to a smaller population mean, and where does that number stabilize?"
It's a harder question to answer than just "can we bully people into having kids", though. But I think the country that answers the question is the one that does best moving forward
Even if that's the case, a slower decline will be much easier to manage than a fast one. Therefore, immigration and increased birthrates are still desirable.
You mean no more rush hour four hour traffic jams????????. That's terrible
Immigration is never a solution. It just creates more freeloaders. Everyone knows that people from thid world countriesLOVE WELFARE.
And how many young adults left as a result of the war in Ukraine? I’ve heard close to a million. Hard to imagine how they make up for the harm Putin had and his oligarch enablers has done to that nation.
I had never considered population increase through war territory acquisition.
When its scorched earth like Ukraine, its a net loss
They're killing the people they supposedly want to acquire though? It's a dumb idea. From a dumb government.
@ it’s not though is it. If they’ve been able to capture a million people then it’s a massive net gain as even worse case estimates put the Russian losses in the 100 - 200 thousand range.
The worst estimates are 2 to 3x that number and you're getting a mostly aging population in rural Ukraine with the entire infrastructure of those regions demolished. That has to be built from scratch while under heavy sanctions. It makes zero economic or demographic sense.
These people aren't really gonna have kids and they're mostly old people as Ukraine also has a demographic issue. Factor in the economic down spiral that this war has resulted in which not only is a financial issue but makes it even more undesirable to have kids, you're really looking at a net loss.
Why? The same reason the US is worried. Fewer people means higher wages. No bottomless pool of desperate peasants willing to work for half a wage.
I keep asking myself why the ones at the top are so concerned about birth rates declining… like it’s their main concern… is it just this - less peasants to work or is it more or different than just that?
There is a huge pool of first generation immigrants willing to work for low wages. The generations after that are not so accommodating.
Fewer people does not mean higher wages in a Dictatorship. Putin is only good at repression and theft.
It could not happen to a nicer nation. Cough cough
Old Puty really messed up.
Might be a good idea to stop sacrificing all your young men on a pointless war
The projection is a 15% decrease in Russian population by 2100. In comparison, China faces a 50% decrease by 2100.
Germany also faces a 15% decline by 2100, Italy, a 40% decline. To check, search "population pyramid" of your preferred country.
0:45 the country is dying out and the world become a better place
Population decline is good for planet earth. It is overburdened by population and being destroyed due to over exploitation of natural resources. GDP is a bad indicator to measure progress or well being of human. What matters is GDP per capita on price parity basis and equitable distribution for well being of population. At present we see few super rich people, vast poor people and struggling middle class in most of the countries.
Counties can’t figure out how they will have people pay taxes in future due to ALL developed countries falling decline of population…growing older population to be supported as well. First they hv tried (under political guise to trick everyone) to push mass immigration from poor countries and blend the social differences, which has totally failed as seen by results of social chaos and loss of their own national identity. Now trying to ban immigration ,but too late to stop changes. Perhaps leaders should try sitting down with think tank and others to attempt to solve this tax & worker problem in a different way!! Our World is overpopulated and can’t possibly sustain more human population… get ready to change the status quo to the long term benefit of our people AND planet. We’re suppose to have vast resource of intelligence… Use it!
Retirement age should be increased. People should be prepared to work full time or part time as long as they can. Only very old physically disabled people should qualify for social security. Many of these people may not need any social security as they may have savings to sustain them. Social security may be needed by unemployed people. It is bad economic policies that leads to unemployment, lack of saving when people are earning to sustain them and this needs to be corrected. Why immigrants are needed, if population is decreasing let economic activities also decrease to sustainable levels. GDP will decrease but why it needs to increase when population is going down.
You're delusional thinking retiring will be an option even if you're a crippled old person. Just look at developing countries where old people work till they die or physically can't move.
There won't be any pension money waiting for them that they themselves haven't saved up which most people haven't.
This then results in a further class divide just like in those developing countries where the rich can afford to retire while the rest of us have to struggle. That is not to mention the availability of health care....
If people don't save money, when they could, why blame the Government. In India, if you have worked in government job, you get lifelong pension after retirement. If you work in organized sector, you get gratuity (15 days of last drawn salary for number of years worked) plus provident fund, which is your mandatory contribution plus employers contribution and interest accumulated. This can keep you going for rest of your life. It is only people in unorganized sectors, who do not have any such privilege. I think only such people need to be provided with old age pension from government funds.
Population decline is not good for anyone.
A living wage would encourage an increase in birth rates and can barely afford to get by on your own anywhere in the world 😂
If Russian government was concerned about their citizens over the past fifty plus years, demographics would be a concern and not an issue
Populationdecline: good for the planet
Russia’s population is rapidly declining? Sounds like a beautiful melody for my ears!
economy in my country has been declining badly for many years now and this also caused polulation and child birth declines. so russia is not alone, ofcourse its not helping that russia have lost so many young men in pointless wars. but the unknown of the future may scare ppl, life is so expensive, its hard even to take care of one person ,so for low income families its even worse.
And whats your country's name
Italy Japan s.koria
Many countries
I was reading the other day on Al Jazeera, the Russian death toll is around 654,000, with 70,000 dead in volunteers alone. Combine that with the millions that have left the country, and the millions who will leave and you have a sizeable population decline. mind you we have around six billion too many people on the planet. so perhaps it's fate.
once they get rid of Putin and rejoin the human race, they can rebuild and encourage immigration.
That makes no sense though since the Russian Military in its entirely only has 1.15 Million active and combat ready soldiers.
654K losses would mean the entire Russian Military has been defeated alongside its Navy and Air Force.
That would also constitute a full absolute collapse of its Government since the Armed Forces has suffered apocaplytic losses.
I agree with the overcrowded feel. I was disgusted in Walmart this evening. It's a damn foreign slum in there, completely overrun. I want things back to less people and no foreigners. Many are very rude & invasive. I don't have children and I think I'm the one who should be getting the tax incentives!!!!! I'm helping the planet.
That's not the death toll, that's including disabled in combat. The death toll is around 300k.
No, overpopulation is just an issue in a handful of countries. We need more people in the world.
Much Respect to Ukraine! 💛
Kind & Honorable'
'War' and winning more land thereby is easier to think about and do, for the males at the top.
Asking WOMEN of child bearing age: 'What' can we do to support, encourage, and enrich your life?
Is too difficult.
These men, from the top down, would have to change.
Oh no 😮
It's not just Russia. In all of Europe. Possibly do not need to worry about climate change coming in about 100 years. That's 3 generation, during that time European race would be 20-25% of what it is now.
"Putin invading Ukraine was Genius" Donald J Trump
Blows my mind - the psychopaths…
@@yestohappiness2721fascists love other fascists
Starting wars doesn’t help.
Make the economy better for people.
I don't see any problem in declining population maybe more countries could follow Russia.
Just watched a film on plastic pollution in Indonesia and Jakarta is one of the most densely populated countries in the world at 70 million, the same population as UK.
Every country has increasing population whether is due to migration from increasing third world populations or declining Western population due to affluence and rising debt and longer life expectancy means most women have to work now.
They talk about saving the planet! from global warming! human rights! pollution! and obsession with preserving human life.
But they won't talk about the real elephant in the room, world overpopulation by humans. No animal would be allowed to increase without nature controlling its numbers why should humans be any different, the problem "IS HUMANS!!".
And as long as population keeps increasing wars and pestilence will preval whether it with or without weapons, the new weapon in the west is Empathy where you can invade a country by putting on a sad face and claiming asylum and they will refuse to send you back to where you came from, one thing I do know the chaos is not going to go away.
If your society won't have kids, you will be replaced by those that do. Simple as.
The entire world should be worried about Demographic problems.
Not worried. The world population experienced an uncontrolled expansion. It's normal to expect an uncontrolled contraction. If people want stability they can not rely on half-baked measures. That's why a colony on Mars would be so important. We should set population limits on Earth based on given criteria. Rather than forcing people to have unwanted babies or look after excess numbers of old age pensioners, we send surplus people to the Mars colony.
The entire world right now is worried about quality, not quantity
Russia can give visas to Pakistanis to migrate over there.
Well the they dotn nedd to do fear collapse of populations
They half carzy guys gona be calamity
In general they should take on all refugees. Problem solved
They have already done, for Pakistan, Afghanistan, people from african countries are also welcomed.
Less blood sacrifice, bloodbath, and blood sweat n tears
How about stopping the pointless war first?
Countries address underpopulation by doing stuff except address what is really causing it.
Trashing a generation of young men in Ukraine is a very strange way of addressing this problem!
so entire regions in Russia are depleted of every male older than 18 who will never retire from the bloodlands of Ukraine and they are worried about population decline? how about asking for an armistice instead and some studs from Africa?
That would dumb it down more no thanks...
@@Howiex-is8gq Lol how did your comment get published? As a very clever African (of which there are many) the soaring eagle hears not the barking of dogs
I disagree@@Howiex-is8gq
Gee, I wonder where their living population is going....oh that's right, many no longer live. Hmmm, I wonder WHY 🤔
So we will eventually run out of russians? My my, what a shame.
Oh, wow! With all the wars and soldiers killed in them what is there to wonder?
The only blame should be placed on Vladimir Putin. How many young men are now dead?
No
The population decline in Russia can be attributed to four significant periods. First, during Operation Barbarossa, the USSR lost approximately 24 million people, including a substantial number of men. While the population did experience some recovery, it never fully rebounded to its previous levels.
The second major factor was the decline that began in 1988, just before the collapse of the Soviet Union. This period marked the beginning of a demographic downturn that would only worsen with the eventual disintegration of the USSR, which resulted in a loss of around 25 million people, including millions of men who vanished from the population. During this time, no one was having children, and the fertility rate plummeted to around 1.6-one of the lowest in the entire world.
Following the Soviet collapse, birth rates continued to decline, and by the time Vladimir Putin came to power, the demographic situation was already dire.
Currently, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine represents the fourth significant demographic challenge. Yes, the war has certainly contributed to the population decline, but it is important to note that Putin is not solely to blame for this crisis. The underlying issues have deep historical roots, and the demographic decline was inevitable, whether Moscow liked it or not.
I am an African and in Africa not having a child is a disaster for a many women. The husband and his family will tell these unlucky women that they will marry another wife. Then there is the issue of gender. A boy is revered in Africa and I'd you keep having daughters, it becomes a problem. So in Africa the fertility rates are so high and culture and society pressures will keep it that way. 6:51
Well, first thing to do is to tell women that they can be independent on their own and basically men are a huge hassle and not worth it... and men aren't as smart as they profess to be.
That's pretty similar to attitudes in, for example, China until a few decades ago and India until very recently, and yet they are also expecting demographic issues (China sooner than India of course). That is likely the future of Subsaharan Africa as well, assuming development increases (so, dependent on country -- Zambia will likely decrease faster than CAR).
Ironic that the concern over the once dreaded "population bomb" is now reversed into a fear about what population decline could mean for capitalism and national security in many societies. A perfect storm of global environmental collapse, global political chaos and contemporary attitudes of abject self-interest make avoiding children an increasingly reasonable decision. Russia is not alone with this issue.
I'm not frightened about population decline but I am concerned about demographic changes.
The refurbishment of a company of T-72 tanks costs about as much as building a hospital and 2 schools from scratch. But hey, who needs all that malarkey when "the motherland needs you"😂
I wonder if losing hubdreds of thousands of young working men in meat grinder human wave attacks in a war has something to do with it 🙄
Becoming a parent makes you vulnerable. I can't recommend it in this day and age.
Let the war mongers themselves produce new soldiers and let oligarchs, shareholders and CEO's produce their own workers. Let's stop catering them.
Возможно, но у нас была низкая рождаемость и до войны тоже. И да, пропаганда рождаемости была даже до войны, льготы, богусы, выплаты, помощь, и очень много всякого бреда. Мы просто не хотим детей
They'll try to "fix" it but end up overcrowding the already terrible orphanages.
Russia & it's health care especially never recovered from the fall of the Soviet Union.
"The Russian government is concerned about the catastrophic decline in the birth rate in Russia." Sounds like: "Jackals and hyenas are concerned that antelopes do not want to reproduce and be eaten."
I think governments worried about this are missing a huge piece of the puzzle. Yes, financial help is good, but people are worried about TIME. If the state provided 24/7 nannies or nurseries, that would make a huge difference.
That's utopia wtf
artificial wombs. I'd get 3 kids then. (I'm not joking, and yes, I'm a woman)
Nonsense!!!!
US, Russia, and Europe, all of it is going down the hole. There's no replacement or fertility rate, some are nearing the apocalpytic levels of South Korea and Japan.
No one is having kids and all of there populations are shrinking. Europe and North America might not have that long within a few generations down the line.
Did we just reach the apex of Human world population number?
The only place with high birth rates is Africa. Seems like the planet is simply over populated and therefore naturally declining.
Who in his/her right mind would move to Russ land
Its a developed world issue. The asset owners take every penny of a workers wage with permanent price rises. It makes it unaffordable for native citizens to have enough children.
This is true, however every country will become developed in time. There are only few truly undeveloped countries in africa. And they lead the world in birthrate.
Seeing as every country will eventually develop that means this is a problem that should be addressed. If we dont, at best we would only lose benefits like pensions etc along with higher taxes. At worst economic collapse as the country loses its workforce rapidly until equillibrium.
Russia let allow 50 million indians & 50 millions Chinese. All Problem solve.
China will not allow that many to move and Russia does not have the economy to draw immigrants from South Asia like europe north america and the middle east do.
The US and EU are investing a lot of money in this war.
Really BBC World Service? You can't even provide a video? These lines moving about cause nausea.
Just look outside.
@@ExploreVanIsle It's dark...
DEFINITELY agree,
At the beginning I thought it was heading for an artsy graph, but no it settled for being a very ugly lava lamp.
SHAME on you BBC.
@@ExploreVanIsle It's dark outside.
@@83counting52 I thought it was cool. I don't know about every time though.
Дума найдет выход, чтобы овцы порадовали волков. Слабый всегда будет служить сильному. В то время как сильный должен есть слабого. «Сильные делают то, что могут, а слабые терпят то, что происходит». История Пелопоннесской войны Фукидида. Кто найдет очевидный, но заросший путь в истории, тот и унаследует землю.
It's not a Russia thing, it is global issue outside Africa, India and the middle east
Iran has one of the lowest birth rate.
Maybe the lower population is a good thing, especially since the larger population tends to abuse the environment to meet its stabilization requirement demands. Never in history have 1st world countries had to worry about clean water for survival. Once the costs of foods decline to a livable amount, we still will have the issue of proper levels of clean water to sustain ourselves, especially when we refuse to reduce, properly dispose of, remove all together known yet legal (in percentages) pollutants, synthetic materials (leading to microplastics), etc. We are ruining our standing on the first mandate God gave us. We are supposed to rule and care of the gift (the earth) he gave us.
China got extra men and russia got extra women
Will the parts fit???😊
Usually in such cases the women from the poorer country go to the richer country's men, so that might help China a bit but not probably not Russia.
Russis has more women of age over 40 than man.
Look at the demographic pyramid.
China has more men below age of 45..50.
So... Technically you're offering chinese man age of 30 marry russian woman age 50.
Okay)
Yep. Russia will continue to be an exporter of mail-order brides.
The war has nothing to do with it.
Britain can send Russian thousands of illegal Immigrants but they must get hotels and meals and spending money and mobile phones for free
Quit whining
It must be in your country how illegals get stuff for free, there is no such thing in Russia and Russians themselves will make sure to put immigrants in place if something will go against Russian citizens. Whole Europe cries and whines and let their streets to be taken and women to be raped, Russians will make sure to show who is the tsar on the soil!
Britain won't do that, they need immigrants
A bonkers solution? Surely that is the one that will solve that problem. The real problem stems from WWII when many young males were killed or sent to the gulags, and not procreating. Leaving a dip in the male bread winner population which repeats with little diminution every 25 years. Putin's mad gamble and his army's inadequacy has added yet another, 25 year cycle of less males. But apart from the mad gamble of capitalism to hitch a reliance on an expanding populace - why should a falling population be harmful? Go on - tell me.
A falling population is harmful to heavily socialized or communist economies because there are fewer young people to pay for supporting the older people. No one to work to pay for the care of the elders.
And of course a falling population is bad for Russia in particular who has historically relied on a disposable peasant population to expand and defend its resources and territory. And so far russia has never shown an interest in a different strategy (Ie, diplomatic relations.)
@@youtubename7819 The improvements in healthcare mean that nominal retirement age of 65 produces fit and healthy "old" people in greater numbers. And certainly in the UK the retirement age for state pensions is rising, in response. Plus a lot of charitable endeavours are staffed by retired people, and the government rely on that so they don't have to provide. A falling population is not, of itself, a problem. Failure to adapt is. Immigration is the de facto solution, and Europe & the US are fighting it - unsuccessfully. The alternative is more people, more pollution, climate change and societal collapse. You choose? Have a nice day.
You want women to have soldiers for you😅😅😅
The wolfs are worried that the sheep’s doesn’t make babies now😊
Ill be dead by the end of the century 😂
great news and great presentor
no crisis at all, all happy
Why are you not at your dictators warring front lines? Why are you not conquering other people's countries? Coward?
😅😂😅
Ну так скажи это всем этим чиновникам, а то они из штанов выпрыгивают, стараются рождаемость повысить 😅
Excellent BBC documentary.
AI, the drones, automatic trucks, taxi, ships and trains, robots and unmanned plants and factories say hello from near future 😁😁😁😁
Why is the reduction of population a bad thing? By the end of this century, it's safely to assume that with the AI advancement, 99.9% of current human jobs can be done by AI. AI labor will be abundant, but natural resources will always be limited, and even more so in the future. So what does Russia or any country need heavy population for? Contribute nothing but consume the very limited natural resources.
They would need a big population to exert dominance over their neighbours - or so they think.
Ai or automation only improves the standard of living.
Stop listening to ludites.
Just because humans are not solitary animals. Become solitary , you will be free.
Because they are sending all to the front?
There's the same isse which the ppliticians in Japan face indeed.
They should be worried. Those demographic numbers are horrific.