The HIDDEN AI Threats to Photographers

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 июн 2024
  • The real threat of artificial intelligence facing photographers isn't that AI will take your job. Instead, bigger threats are already underway, which I'll explain in this episode. Below are links mentioned in this video:
    Online courses to learn Real Estate Photography:
    LearnRE.NathanCool.com
    Learn Pro Interior Photography:
    ProInteriors.NathanCool.com
    Expert Editing for Interior Photography:
    ExpertEditing.NathanCool.com
    Learn Pro Exterior Photography:
    ProExteriors.NathanCool.com
    Learn Videography for Real Estate:
    ProVideo.NathanCool.com
    My books on real estate photography:
    amzn.to/3T84iax
    Article on OpenAI and carbon footprint:
    www.scientificamerican.com/ar...
  • ХоббиХобби

Комментарии • 16

  • @NathanCoolPhoto
    @NathanCoolPhoto  16 дней назад

    To those asking if AI will one-day be good enough to replace photogs with cellphone shots: I get asked this question every time I post a video on AI, and the answer remains the same: It likely won't happen, but not for the reasons you might think. Although the physics of light alone will restrict AI from doing what flash can for RE photography while providing truth-in-advertising restricted work (i.e. REP), the cost of making a program and recouping those costs from clients would very likely cost more than just paying an RE photography to do the work. Also, scam companies are coming out of the woodwork saying they have AI apps that can turn cellphone photos into unbelievable images, but, as I'll show in an upcoming video, these "Apps" do nothing more than collect your photos and send them to overseas editors. That's why they have 24-48 hour turnarounds; if it was AI, it would be immediate. Even with that aside, the core of this issue is cost: Although we can dream of technology, it doesn't it would be profitable enough for a company to create it and maintain it. If that weren't the case then we'd all be using flying cars while using our bionic powered limbs. So TL;DR, you're job is secure 🧐

  • @mdhazeldine
    @mdhazeldine 17 дней назад +2

    I agree that AI won't take our jobs directly. Of all the techniques you need to learn to stop other photographers stealing your jobs, Adobe's AI tools are some of the easiest out there. You literally brush the AI removal tool over the thing you want to remove or draw a box around it and hit generate. I don't think there are going to be many photographers sitting there feeling left behind unless they're too lazy to work that out. What concerns me more is that AI will steal the jobs of portrait and product photographers and then they will look to change genre into types of photography that AI can't replace, and they will try to get into real estate/architecture. So we'll suffer from further increased competition, which will drive rates down on average.

  • @Papparratzi
    @Papparratzi 17 дней назад +1

    You’re 100% on target. In 2001, I set myself ahead of the curve by purchasing the taboo in publishing. I bought a digital 4 mb Oly E-10. All of my blowback came from the publisher saying it was too low rez. Reluctantly they excepted a few small pics and in print, they looked cleaner than the scanned film prints. Understanding that digital was the future, I became more proficient than the film photographers and turn around times were much faster.
    AI has already helped me to a lesser extent set myself apart against higher level photographers than I faced 20 years ago.
    My advice, listen to what Nathan is saying and learn how to use AI to set yourself above your competitors.

  • @mtnman1984
    @mtnman1984 17 дней назад +1

    Great commentary. It's the same kind discussion that happened around the shift from film to digital. It's another tool.

  • @megapixel2529
    @megapixel2529 16 дней назад +1

    What do you think about the possibility of AI being able to generate accurate real estate style images from things like a Cubi Casa Scan in the future? Once it has a full high res scan of the property it would be able to generate a whole photoshoot from one scan, it can already do a digital version of it for video

  • @anthonymclennan3208
    @anthonymclennan3208 15 дней назад

    Great video, thanks Nathan. I'm struggling to get efficient object removal in Photoshop 2024 using generative fill. It takes ages, and often returns poor results. Should I be using a different version of PS, or where does one access the AI object removal tools?

    • @NathanCoolPhoto
      @NathanCoolPhoto  14 дней назад

      Thank you! Since GenAI uses Adobe's servers, it sounds like your internet connection may be slow.

  • @SergiuIlisie
    @SergiuIlisie 16 дней назад

    1:43 with what AI program you edited that picture to have a final result like that?

    • @NathanCoolPhoto
      @NathanCoolPhoto  16 дней назад +1

      Photoshop, but as mentioned, only portions of that were AI. Lighting was also used for the initial image, and AI was used for certain changes and enhancements.

  • @Kentsj
    @Kentsj 17 дней назад +1

    500 tons, where did you get that number?

    • @NathanCoolPhoto
      @NathanCoolPhoto  17 дней назад +2

      Scientific American, link in description.

  • @videoandphotographyllc
    @videoandphotographyllc 3 дня назад

    Do they have an AI app that does HDR bracketing with a good final result?

    • @NathanCoolPhoto
      @NathanCoolPhoto  День назад

      Great question, but no. The cost of making such an app would outweigh the justification and cost for those who would use it: it'd have to be cheaper to make and sell than outsourcing, and there's no way it could defy the laws of physics when using flash, and, moreover, get repeatable results. This might make a great topic for another video?

  • @pinkace8221
    @pinkace8221 17 дней назад +1

    may be Tesla have the solution...

  • @davidgambin2551
    @davidgambin2551 14 дней назад

    Adapt or die complaining 😂