California did better than I would've guessed, but the games they played flipping a bunch of races a month after the election is damning enough. Thank you for the work
Minnesota has always had high rates of election participation. It has also always had high rates of high school graduation. The states with low turnout also have low graduation rates. There's a clear correlation between the two. And while high turnout might be due to voter fraud, high graduation rates cannot be. So it is at least plausible that there is some social factor that results in both turnout and graduation.
I was trying to figure out where the extra votes for Biden came from in 2020 and did something similar. Yeah, there's a lot about our federal elections that doesn't make sense statistically. About one third of the "voters" that made the difference in the 2020 election were in CA in 2020 and not in 2024 but the local lefties are blaming that on sexism.
It does cause a problem when there has been actual news videos showing individuals participating in fraudulent ballot harvesting, aided massive amounts of ballots being mailed to bogus addresses and to non-existing voters
Two blue states that narrowly didn't become swing states (VA, NJ) and two actual swing states (WI, MI) are claiming that there are more people registered that can legally vote in their state. NJ doesn't require an ID to vote and VA doesn't require a photo ID to vote, which means that there is a massive chance that at least 1/20 NJ votes are fake, given that a sizeable amount of Americans don't register to vote. Even a 2% change in certain states placed correctly could flip an election. In terms of percent change decrease in Trump's votes needed to flip the election, a 3.4% change in PA, a 2.9% change in MI, and a 1.8% change in WI flips it to Kamala. That's a 229,000 person vote swing. That's not even considering how this affectted local elections in places like CA. Is this not concerning to you, or did you just not think it thrrough?
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Well done. This is something that could easily be done by real journalists, or government watchdogs. I've shared this, and hope it opens eyes.
You expect journalists nowadays to do work?
Dr. Frank, thank you so very much for this presentation and coming to us twice in Michigan. God bless you sir!
And yes, VOTE AMISH!
Lol
California did better than I would've guessed, but the games they played flipping a bunch of races a month after the election is damning enough. Thank you for the work
You were very entertaining and informative at our meet up in Iowa. Thank you, sir!
Glad you enjoyed it!
My wife is still registered to vote in Indiana and she's been dead for ten years!
Thank you!!!!
Minnesota has always had high rates of election participation. It has also always had high rates of high school graduation. The states with low turnout also have low graduation rates. There's a clear correlation between the two. And while high turnout might be due to voter fraud, high graduation rates cannot be. So it is at least plausible that there is some social factor that results in both turnout and graduation.
Very cool!
very interesting, indeed.
Thank you for doing this hard work for such vital information.
I was trying to figure out where the extra votes for Biden came from in 2020 and did something similar. Yeah, there's a lot about our federal elections that doesn't make sense statistically. About one third of the "voters" that made the difference in the 2020 election were in CA in 2020 and not in 2024 but the local lefties are blaming that on sexism.
Excellent analysis, sir. Now, how do we get all states into the green? I see my home state of Arizona is close.
Start a local team!
where can I watch your 2020 election analysis?
FrankSpeech.com. Look for “Scientific Proof”
OK so what. Show it caused an election problem.
It does cause a problem when there has been actual news videos showing individuals participating in fraudulent ballot harvesting, aided massive amounts of ballots being mailed to bogus addresses and to non-existing voters
You mean like all the dead people who have been voting?
How can there be more people registered to vote than there are people who are legally eligible to vote? Does that not matter?
Two blue states that narrowly didn't become swing states (VA, NJ) and two actual swing states (WI, MI) are claiming that there are more people registered that can legally vote in their state. NJ doesn't require an ID to vote and VA doesn't require a photo ID to vote, which means that there is a massive chance that at least 1/20 NJ votes are fake, given that a sizeable amount of Americans don't register to vote. Even a 2% change in certain states placed correctly could flip an election. In terms of percent change decrease in Trump's votes needed to flip the election, a 3.4% change in PA, a 2.9% change in MI, and a 1.8% change in WI flips it to Kamala. That's a 229,000 person vote swing. That's not even considering how this affectted local elections in places like CA. Is this not concerning to you, or did you just not think it thrrough?