Although I'm not Baptist Christian. I think your sermon are true and very good. That why I use KING JAMES BIBLE rather than Other Translation. Thank you and God bless you.
I am not done listening, but you have said enough to say you are correct. I also know you are correct because I won't read anything but the KJV. People can read what they want. I KNOW the KJV is the ONLY version that is pure --- not based on RUclips or the words of man, but because when there was no RUclips or anything, I was told to use other versions of the bible in the 1980's after I got saved. From Christians who LOVE the Lord, so I listened and I tried. The best I could do was get a Bible that had the KJV and 3 other versions, so I could always compare those version against the KJV. I finally gave up and said, "ALL I NEED IS THE KJV". Also, why would a known occultist and Satan worshipper like Manly P. Hall want to get new versions into world during his day. That says it all -- read below: "To make things right we will have to undo much that is cherished error. The problem of revising the Bible shows how difficult it is to do this. For the last hundred years we have been trying to get out an edition of the Bible that is reasonably correct; but nobody wants it. What`s wanted is the good old King James version, every jot and tittle of it, because most people are convinced that God dictated the Bible to King James in English." (Emphasis mine.) Never mind that he lied about King James Bible-believers. Catch what he said? Who is "we"? Hall is an occultist! Who was he involved with? And what did "they" do to the Bible, from the 1840s-1940s? The only "Bible" supposedly found in the 1840s was Codex Sinaiticus. Why is an occultist, who disbelieves the Bible, concerned with "fixing" it? If he got rid of the King James Bible, what would go in its place? "Psychology can be the basic science of human tolerance..." Psychology from grade one and teaching "tolerance" sounds like today! Hall is right. For a new world order, you`d need people conditioned from childhood, like the Nazis conditioned German kids. (He actually wrote that, too.) And for "tolerance," you need people who will "go with the flow."
I studied both Manly P. Hall and Albert Pike (book named "Morals and Dogma"...they hate Jesus Christ and followers of Christ. Everything for them is about the occult, Kaballah etc. God Bless you for knowing truth, its rare nowadays.
I am not reading my Bible in english but in my mother tongue. But what this man says is so true. I see exactly the same thing in my own language in later translations. Thankfull to God for men like this.
The KJB is what was given to us in the English language. It follows the TR which is the inspired words of God passed down from the original authors. If your mother tongue follows the TR, then you my brother have the inspired words of God as we do. Amen.
So thankful for Dr Stringer’s clear presentation of truth. I too have, by nature, a rebellious heart that needs to be reined in by the pure Word of God as found in the KJV.
Be like David, and ask God to create in you a clean heart. Lay down your sinfulness at the foot of Jesus, and give up your Self once and for all. If you are born again, your "nature" is the nature of Christ. You are thus a "new creature," who no longer resides in Death and sin. You have been set free by your faith in what Christ did on the cross. You have died to Self, and put on "the new man." Believe what the bible says: You are free.
Which of the at least ten different revisions of the KJV is the so called "pure word of God"? Why do the KJV only cultists not speak in King James English? Yet they teach this KJV only heresy. Confining Almighty God to some archaic imperfect uninspired translation of scripture called the KJV.
There is a Seventh Day Adventist (I’m not nor do anyone has to be), but my point is there is a lecturer named Walter Veith who did a series called Total Onslaught, and in that series he did two lectures called “Battle of the Bibles” that are really good on this subject. The later videos of the series is where it gets weird. The point to be made is this battle is at least as old as the New Testament itself. Everything “they say” shouldn’t be in the Bible actually has Very Good evidence for its legitimacy. 1 John 5:7 being one of those. Many good videos on the historicity of this verse.
All the modern versions (250+) all come from corrupted manuscripts based on Westcott and Hort who made a "new" greek NT They were occultism, did not believe in the virgin birth, did not believe in salvation by grace through faith. It has since been revised again. They used the manuscripts that were found in the Vatican or a monastery. They are filled with errors, they don't even agree with each other. They have the apocryphal in them. They are all against the King James because it was from a different manusript-- the Textus Receptus.
@@bobbyadkins6983You certainly should not believe everything you hear. Especially the lies of the KJV only cult that say modern versions come from corrupt manuscripts.
Dr. stringer I looked up what u said was in the Geneva Bible and couldn’t find it…btw I understand that the Geneva Bible was actually before the King James Bible is that correct? and I’m wondering what is wrong with the Geneva Bible ? Thank u
They never had trouble reading the KJB until a generation was raised on perversions. As a choirboy in the 1950s I remember my local church changing to the NES. I was very disappointed to have to listen to a debased, unpoetic, faulty version. As time went on I noticed it had many errors and textural differences to the old bible. Now, we have a plethora of versions to complicate and confuse the matter. Many people now just don't believe that God has given us a perfect bible. Satan is delighted! I still use the sharp sword of the KJB, not to be confused by the so called NKJ, another faulty New Age Verion.
What perversions are you taking about? Not the brilliant modern translations that God has blessed us with. So what perversions? Is that the typical ignorance of a KJV only cultist?
Howard Long, what perversions are they? Not the excellent modern translations God has blessed us with? Translated from earlier more accurate manuscripts, than the later manuscripts dedicated to the Pope used by the KJV translators. I believe in the perfect Word of God. His name is Jesus, the Word that became flesh and dwelt among us. If you mean is there a perfect translation of the scripture. There is not one. If there is, it is not in English. Certainly not the archaic English of the KJV, where so many words have changed meaning. Making the KJV even more inaccurate. Which is why God has blessed us with more accurate modern translations Satan has truly used the false teaching of the KJV only cultist to bring doubt on the word of God... Who vilify any other translation, calling them perversions, corrupt even sataniic. If it is not the their idol the KJV. Meanwhile God is using and blessing these transactions to bring many to Christ. Exposing what a blasphemous idolatrous cult the KJV only deception is.
Howard Long, what perversions are they? Not the excellent modern translations God has blessed us with? Translated from earlier more accurate manuscripts, than the later manuscripts dedicated to the Pope used by the KJV translators. I believe in the perfect Word of God. His name is Jesus, the Word that became flesh and dwelt among us. If you mean is there a perfect translation of the scripture. There is not one. If there is, it is not in English. Certainly not the archaic English of the KJV, where so many words have changed meaning. Making the KJV even more inaccurate. Which is why God has blessed us with more accurate modern translations Satan has truly used the false teaching of the KJV only cultist to bring doubt on the word of God... Who vilify any other translation, calling them perversions, corrupt even sataniic. If it is not the their idol the KJV. Meanwhile God is using and blessing these transactions to bring many to Christ. Exposing what a blasphemous idolatrous cult the KJV only deception is.
@@henrylaurel1188My previous post has seemed to have deleted,,or disappeared? If you want to know the truth, I’ll be happy to fill you in on the details? But the modern Church has been lied to(including myself), and I am angry about it! Having done much research on this topic.
Hi folks, at 35:20 mins in, Ps. Stringer says in the Geneva Bible read the footnotes in psalm 148, that they say its ok to execute the king. Welp I'm reading my geneva 1560, and I can't find it, did he misquote the verse number? Or perhaps is it in the 1589 version? I've read other shocking marginal notes in the Geneva, so I'm not surprised, but I just like to check these things.
4:52 min - Virginia Mollencott. Some NIV defenders say she was fired, she says she wasn't. The correctly phrased question to ask her would have been, "Did you involuntarily leave the NIV effort?" Also, did anyone bother to ask the NIV committee for their side of the story? Their website says that she was asked to leave. I've seen this many a time in the business world, "You're leaving us, which would you prefer on your resume, 'resigned from' or 'fired from'?" Many choose resignation to avoid being made a "leper" by termination. I am NOT saying that the NIV handled Mollencott that way, but I am illustrating how someone may be effectively fired without hearing "you're fired!" 8:50 min - Joseph Smith, JUNIOR, got the "revelations". Someone reported on his web site that Joseph Smith died in Nauvoo. Yes, a Mormon named Joseph Smith DID die there, Joseph Smith, SENIOR. However Joseph Smith, JUNIOR, the "prophet", went down in a blaze of glory at the Carthage, IL jail shootout. It is important to accurately identify which Joseph Smith to avoid mis-identification. Sadly, many writers are sloppy in this detail. But more importantly, while this deceiver claimed visitations, Mormon doctrine supposedly comes from golden "plates" buried some centuries earlier that only Joey, Jr. could translate. Sadly, Hebrews 11:4 held true for false doctrine
@jandasanders I have a problem with the KJV Only people. It caused an issue between me and my ex-wife back in the 1990's. I didn't even know it was a thing!!!!
@@kevinjodrey7664 I am Kjv only in thats what is study, read and get all doctrine from etc. but i dont believe you can only get saved from a KJV bible as long the person gets saved biblically. We talk in our own way to witness but our doctrine for salvation comes from the bible.
@@kevinjodrey7664 I use the NIV as well. Started using it long before I heard of the KJV only deception. No where is there a scripture that supports this KJV only teaching. So it should be rejected for the heretical teaching that it is.
@@howardlong6735All translations convict of sin when the Holy Spirit breathes on them. Just as he did before there was ever a KJV. After all the KJV is nothing more than a translation.
@@Harold-mb6sj Most modern bibles come from obscure so-called biblical manuscripts, known as the Alexandria/critical/eclectic text type. There are primarily three copies, and they not only have serious issues, but are corrupt, fraudulent documents! The KJB comes from TR/Majority text/Byzantine type text trace to Antioch in the 1st century AD as the only true Biblical manuscripts. Which is supported by the most ancient Bibles from the 1st & 2nd centuries AD(ie Syriac-mid 2nd century AD, Greek Orthodox NT mid-2nd century AD, and the Old Latin 90-130 AD). Then there are the scripture quotes of the early Church leaders(you can actually reconstruct the Bible with their quotes). All of these match together with the KJB. I'll explain more on the KJB later.
Thank you this video helped me! I have numerous proofs that the KJB verses are inspired, all 31,102 of them. Thanks for the video ^ In case you wanted/cared to know a small part of one example I have: Do you have a proper/accurate word search program? Type exactly "in", if your program is accurate it must include UPPER and LOWER CASE. There are 12,338 lower case, and 336 upper case. You should get 12,674. Type exactly "earth"........................................ it must specify LOWER CASE. You get 985 (If you get 987, it’s because of the EARTH in revelation, and Earth in Genesis). Type exactly "the"........................................... it must include UPPER and LOWER CASE. There are 17 with ALL CAPS, 62,173 lower case, and 1,851 upper case. You should get 64,041. Type exactly “Amen”……………………………it must specify UPPER CASE. You get 77. (If you get 78, it’s because of the lower case amen in Numbers 5:22). Genesis 1:1 and Revelation 22:21 are the verses where these four words come from. This is proof verses are inspired. Every phone has a calculator. I'm not totaling this for people who don't care. If your search program can specify what books of the bible you can search, specify only Genesis and Revelation: Type exactly “in” your program must include UPPER and LOWER CASE. You should get 767. (There are 754 lower case, and 13 upper case, in Genesis and Revelation). Type exactly “amen” or “Amen”, there are no lower case amen in Genesis or Revelation. If you doubt God's word as I did, download King James Pure Bible Search and do this simple word search. Jesus is our Amen. Jesus is in the earth. We are in the Amen. Revelation 3:14 ●●●● But if you want to skip software searches, just take your KJV book, and count the letters of each verse, (Genesis 1:1, Revelation 1:1). Each verse also has exact letters. Each verse also has exact vowels. Each verse also has exact consonants. Each verse also has at least 4 other patterns I don't have space or time to expand on. The first verse of the KJV: KJB Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Revelation 22:21 The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen. ●●●● "in" and "Amen", (both not Case Sensitive), with search scope in Genesis and Revelation only, will total 777 occurrences. Easily verified with King James Pure Bible Search! ●●●● The KJB was first published in 1611: Acts 16:11 prophecies the KJB in london if you draw a straight line from the two cities in that verse, Troas and Neapolis, the line will extend you right to Oxford and the middle of London. The line will keep going into the heart of the USA. The mountain paul uses to navigate to Neapolis is 1611 meters high, Samothrace.... also within that verse. Check it on Wikipedia: "Fengari" is the mountain. I know more patterns from that verse...verify it! ●●●● (Also, the 777,777th word in the KJB is "love" in 2 John 1:6 "And this is love..."). God is love, (1 John 4:8) What are the chances of all this? I have over 400 more of such examples, these are my personal favorites. No man who doesn't have the direction of the Spirit of God can do all this. The percieved errors in the KJB are part of God's plan of faith. Its heartbreaking that people doubt God's power. The so called errors have many signatures of God built in them and form part of many patterns. The so called errors are not errors. ●●●● When you search in KJPBS, each phrase occurance is counted, (Search scope is entire bible): The Father (not case sensitive)=218 occurances The Word (not case sensitive)=469 occurrences Holy Ghost (not case sensitive)=90 occurrences You will get=777 I am currently learning so much about the KJB from TruthisChrist on RUclips webchannel.purebiblesearch.com ●●●● "The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times." Which is why there were 7 major English translations before the KJB. The KJV was commissioned in 1604 and published in 1611, exactly 7 years. Solomon, whose father spoke the verse above, built the temple in the 4th year of his reign and finished it in the 11th, 7 years later, 1 Kings 6:37-38. The spirit of God resides in this book as he did in the temple. And he will enter the temple of your heart if you let him build you and your ability to understand the bible too. Come back to your KJB, what little I read in it at least I thrive knowing the Spirit of God is in it. ●●●● I can't help but share this... 2 john 1:6 contains the 777,777th word in the 1769 Cambridge Edition of the KJB...It is "love". The 1769 Cambridge Edition totals the word count "in" + "earth" + "the" + "Amen" = 77,777, (from Genesis 1:1 and Revelation 22:21). Be careful of your search software and Case Sensitive is important, ("in" and "the" are not CS and "Amen" + "earth" are): use King James Pure Bible Search. It differentiates instances, such as two occurrences of "the" in one verse etc, instead counts individual occurrences. (Also "in" + "Amen" in Genesis + Revelation total 777). Check out TruthisChrist on RUclips for hundreds more. (This is not Numerology, it's a fact that "Jesus" + "Jesus'" is in the bible 983 times, 3 are not speaking of Jesus the Christ: two of those reference Joshua of the old testament, (Hebrews 4:8, Acts 7:45), and one refers to a guy named Justus, (Colossians 4:11). Bar-jesus should definitely not be counted. So aside from this, every reference to our Saviour is 980 times, which is 70x7 + 70x7.) Do you want to know what every capital name of God, like BRANCH, JAH, AND JESUS add up to when combined to "Jesus" and "Jesus'"? If you get 7781, you added 3 names of Jesus that do not refer to him and your software counts Barjesus, or you missed a capital names of God and Jesus. If added correctly, the 1769 KJB will give you a total count of 7777. LORD = 6472 GOD = 310 I AM = 3 JEHOVAH = 4 JAH = 1 BRANCH = 2 KING = 5 JESUS = 6 Jesus = 967 Jesus' = 10 = 7777 Minus 3 antimentions and don't count Barjesus. I am currently learning so much about the KJB from TruthisChrist on RUclips webchannel.purebiblesearch.com May God bless you
When anyone gets born again.... God - THE HOLY SPIRIT ( will Guide ) that person ....... And God Who declares "is no respector of person's ", isn't going to interact one way with one person, than with another person. Otherwise, God is the author of confusion.
I don't have any problem with the KJV but I have a lot of problems with the KJV Only nonsense as if it is the only valid version discounting any translations that came before or after. Nevermind those who don't speak English. Guess what. The Geneva bible is also God's word and predates the Anglican Authorized version.
I don't have any problem with the KJV either. If that is what some people prefer no problem But is the KJV only teaching nonsense? Not just nonsense but downright heresy. Personally I prefer modern more accurate translations in English I can understand.
NIV has 64,000 words missing and the list goes on and on. GENEVA WAS NEVER COMPLETE. Kjv is the 1st COMPLETE bible in the ENGLISH language 7th translation 1st completed! The bible even makes reference to the seventh translation. By the way you can get a k j v in every language😂👍
@@kylersmyangel Heard it all before. No words missing because older superior manuscripts were used that did not have these uninspired words Truth is the KJV using later manuscripts dedicated to the Pope. Had many uninspired verses added to it. Added by uninspired scribes. If the KJV cult was honest, they would know that. But nothing honest about the KJV only cult. Which is based on conspiracy theories, double standards and nothing but lies. To try and justify the KJV only heresy. Also could not care about the KJV in any language. I stopped reading this archaic imperfect uninspired translation years ago That was before I heard of the unbilical Christ dishonouring doctrine of devils called KJV onlyism
@@kylersmyangel Could be that the KJV has 64000 added words. After all the KJV was translated from later manuscripts. That is what happens when the KJV is treated like the standard. Rather than the imperfect translation it is. Untrue comments are made about the NIV having missing verses
To claim the KJB contains no errors is arrogant! Why did The Translators use Titles for God and His Son, use a Greek name for our Jewish Savior? Why do Protestants violate the 3rd and 4th Commandment? Yahuah is the name of The Almighty!!! Yeshua is the name of Our Savior!!! Rome in AD 336 changed The Sabbath to Sunday and The Protestants gladly followed it, violating Yahuah's Commandment! The Translators said their work was not perfect and would need updating as time went by, read the Preface to the 1611 KJV, not the 1769 KJV we all use today, yes, it was updated, so, it was not without errors!!! Yahuah established The Sabbath, not The Church, back in Genesis! IFB believe they speak for Yahuah, but, they never preach from The Old Covenant, except The Psalms or Proverbs. They believe they do not have to obey The Law, although Yeshua was very clear to refute that, as was Paul. It is ok to use the other translations to compare word to word, and thank Yahuah for Bible Software which makes that easier. Finally, the Rapture Theory, came from a woman, not Scripture. When you try to prove this theory you have to take verses out of context in Paul's Writing in 2 Thessalonians, plus, disregard the earlier Prophets of the OT and look at Revelations as The Church not being mentioned. Unless you study prophecy correctly, you will believe a theory, Tim Lahey Fictious Movies and probably commit suicide when you realize you believed a lie.....you learn you are entering the Tribulation and have no money, no home, no job, no food, no friends, while your Pastor is probably in hiding or dead. Study to show yourself approved.....don't merely take the word of the man behind the pulpit, seeing you are meeting on The Roman Sabbath. Don't worship Yahuah's Holy Word!
Hating the KJV is nonsense and an irrational repudiation of a good and solid translation. If you do not like the Old English use the New KJV. That aside, If one simply lesrned to read Hebrew and Greek this whole stupid and useless argument collapses like a cheap tent under an avalanche of snow. Translation method and the value of the KJV as a translation are two separate things. Mr Stringer in his sophistry has done a good job confusing and falsely integrating two distinct areas of study and concern. Typical KJV strawman and red herring arguments laid out here. For those familiar with the original languages, such rubbish is insulting and academically degrading. Perhaps the average English reader who has never bothered to learn any Greek or Hebrew in depth may be taken in by this pedestrian approach to an important subject but those who know better can only lament the great lack of learning and understanding that is commonplace in most evangelical Churches. Deal with the original text of scripture, sound hermeneutics and real honest exegesis and truly teach and impart saving truth and knowledge to the people of God. Defending a particular translation on such shaky ground and making an issue of it as if Gods plan of salvation is limited for the most part to one fallible translation and they are all subjected to the authority of the original text is vanity. Deal with the more pressing issues of translation philosophy and method or teaching Greek and Hebrew proper would go a long way in the building up and edifying of the body of Christ in their most holy and precious faith. That is what a true man.of God would be zealously interested in not this. Even the translators of the KJV would in no way glorify their own work and remove tjemselves to all of the advances that have come to the surface of the very vocabulary of the words of holy scripture and other items of an exegetical nature. One would think that Mr Stringer had wished that all forthcoming knowledge and scholarship would have ceased in 1611. The KJV men I am sure wouldn't agree or be satisfied that all efforts at translation improvement should not be welcomed and pursued. Outside of the English speaking world should the KJV be translated into other tongues? Another blow to the folly of this whole KJV thing. 29:28
Also shame about those who do not speak English. Especially the archaic English of the KJV. Obviously the only ones who have the truth are the KJV only cultist.
Was waiting on an Ellen White comment. Please do yourself a favor and read The Great controversy, Desire of the Ages, Steps to Christ. Any one of those books and see for yourself what she has written about Jesus. He is God. He is the Son of God, equal to the Father. The Bible says if someone denies that Jesus is the Son of God, then there's a problem. She did the opposite. She lifted Christ up. She also pointed to her work as not as important as the Bible. And that if people were studying the Bible it would not have been necessary for them to read her books in the first place. As a researcher, go and read one of these books, and then come and leave me a comment here. I will be waiting. In her time there was only one other lady that published a lot of books. This lady known as Helena Blavatsky did the opposite of what Ellen White did. She said Lucifer was the light, she spoke on spiritualism, and lifted that up. She denied Christ as the Savior of the world. And so where God was doing a great work through one lady, satan was doing the opposite through another.
Your video is incompetent. I personally know, and have known thousands of believers who use non KJV English versions who do not hate the KJV. Also, they are not members of cults, or occult, they are mostly southern Baptists. You clearly do not agree with the revisers of the Bishops Bible, the 1611 KJV translators, what they say and explain to the readers in their letter to the readers which is presently with held from KJV readers. Why is that letter with held from the readers? You must not know the history of the KJV Bible. You must not be aware that the Catholic pew Bible, the revised Bishops Bible called the 1611 KJV is nowhere near like the modern KJVs. The KJVs today are not exactly the same. However, the doctrines taught in the NIV, ESV, NRSV, NET, NKJV, LSB, NASB, RV, AV, and others, are exactly the same doctrines found in the KJV. Your video is unmitigated deception. You are misleading our brothers and sisters in Christ.
@@Rightlydividing-wx1xb All of your information is absolutely incorrect! Most modern bibles like you mentioned are based on three obscure so-called manuscripts, that are actually fraudulent fake documents! Which I will show you how! The KJB that is used today is the 1769 update which was mainly spelling updates, and minor grammar only, that’s it! Otherwise it is the same as the 1611, minus the notes, and the apocrypha books which do not belong in the canon of scripture. I used the NIV(78&84), and the NASB(77&95) for more than 30 years, along with the KJB. With all the missing verses, words, phrases, passages, brackets, notes etc in most modern bibles, there is a stark difference, and they do affect, change doctrine! The KJB Bible, the reformed era Bibles, and a few recent additions, all come from the TR/Majority text/Byzantine type text. These are the only true Biblical manuscripts that traced to Antioch, and the first century. With an unbroken line that preserved the word of God. These are also supported by the multiple ancient Bibles in various languages from the 1st&2nd centuries AD. Then on top of that we have the scripture quotes from the early Church leaders( which you can reconstruct the entire Bible from them). All of these match up together, with the KJB! The are no errors in the KJB, none, zero. It’s not just perfect, it’s mathematically perfect! I’ll do more later.
I have attempted a few times to respond, and they keep disappearing? Most of what you mentioned is incorrect. I used modern translations for more than 30 years(specifically NIV-78&84, NASB-77&95), along with the KJB. There are stark differences because of the different textual basis that are used. With most modern bibles you do not have the full council of all of God's word, and there are doctrinal differences. The KJB that most people use today is the 1769 update, where spelling was updated, and some grammar, that's it!
@@claytonsmith6148There are no doctrinal differences in the more accurate modern translations. A blatant lie from a KJV only cultists. The NIV is far stronger on the deity of Christ and the Holy Spirit than the KJV. Also since when was the imperfect uninspired KJV the standard by which we judge other translations?
@@henrylaurel1188 I sent you two pretty detailed postings, not sure if you got them? They do not show on my end? Here are just two specific passages that affect doctrine, and one that makes Jesus a liar. 1 Corinthians 1:18 the KJB say's "are saved", modern bibles like NASB, NIV, ESV- say's "are being saved". The word "being" is not in the Greek, it is a modern revisionist addition, and did not exist prior to the mid-1800's. You are either saved or you are not saved, period! We do grow through sanctification, by the Holy Ghost/Spirit. Next: Acts 8:37 KJB shows a person must believe on the Lord Jesus Christ before being Baptized. NASB has it in brackets, brings doubt in God's word(just like the devil does in Gen 3:1), NIV just puts it in notes( most people don't even read the notes), ESV removes it all together(the devil is a thief, just like the birds in the parable of the sower). In John 7:8 KJB Jesus says "I go not yet unto the feast", the NIV says "I am not going up to this festival", hence making Jesus a liar!
@@henrylaurel1188 Just so you know the term KJV-only comes pretty much from the outside they don't refer to themselves in that way. They would say they are TR/Majority text/Byzantine type text only, and KJB preferred/best. Which is how I identify, but I do utilize other Bibles from these manuscripts: pre-KJB Reformed era Bibles, and there are more recent ones, the MEV, MLV, and WEB.
Okay a marginally better translation of of the Bible. Then the Geneva Bible it was to replace. However, History is on the side of the Douy Rhines Bible. Published before the KJV. And containing all 73 books of the canon as was originally agreed upon at the Church council at Carthage. Cruce Dum Spiro Fido.
![Chicken P - People's Favorite (Remix) [Feat. 42 Dugg] (Official Video)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/a6Bn8FEtxmY/mqdefault.jpg)
Although I'm not Baptist Christian. I think your sermon are true and very good.
That why I use KING JAMES BIBLE rather than Other Translation.
Thank you and God bless you.
We don't simply "use", we "believe" in every word of the King James Bible.
I am not done listening, but you have said enough to say you are correct. I also know you are correct because I won't read anything but the KJV. People can read what they want. I KNOW the KJV is the ONLY version that is pure --- not based on RUclips or the words of man, but because when there was no RUclips or anything, I was told to use other versions of the bible in the 1980's after I got saved. From Christians who LOVE the Lord, so I listened and I tried. The best I could do was get a Bible that had the KJV and 3 other versions, so I could always compare those version against the KJV. I finally gave up and said, "ALL I NEED IS THE KJV". Also, why would a known occultist and Satan worshipper like Manly P. Hall want to get new versions into world during his day. That says it all -- read below:
"To make things right we will have to undo much that is cherished error. The problem of revising the Bible shows how difficult it is to do this. For the last hundred years we have been trying to get out an edition of the Bible that is reasonably correct; but nobody wants it. What`s wanted is the good old King James version, every jot and tittle of it, because most people are convinced that God dictated the Bible to King James in English." (Emphasis mine.)
Never mind that he lied about King James Bible-believers. Catch what he said?
Who is "we"? Hall is an occultist! Who was he involved with? And what did "they" do to the Bible, from the 1840s-1940s? The only "Bible" supposedly found in the 1840s was Codex Sinaiticus. Why is an occultist, who disbelieves the Bible, concerned with "fixing" it? If he got rid of the King James Bible, what would go in its place? "Psychology can be the basic science of human tolerance..."
Psychology from grade one and teaching "tolerance" sounds like today!
Hall is right. For a new world order, you`d need people conditioned from childhood, like the Nazis conditioned German kids. (He actually wrote that, too.) And for "tolerance," you need people who will "go with the flow."
I studied both Manly P. Hall and Albert Pike (book named "Morals and Dogma"...they hate Jesus Christ and followers of Christ. Everything for them is about the occult, Kaballah etc. God Bless you for knowing truth, its rare nowadays.
@@jesuschristmyking8644It certainly is.
Great message! We were warned about this 30 years ago.
You are right. Riplinger's book, New Age Bible Versions, has it all and came out in 1993.
@@johnlopez-qq4eh that book
@@johnlopez-qq4ehGail Riplinger KJV only heretic. More chances of pigs flying, than this charlatan telling the truth.
Longer then that. BG Wilkerson before that..
John Burgeon before that.
Greetings dearly beloved in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth ❤✝️🔥
The King James Bible does not condone your sin; it convicts you of sin.
It is the Holy Spirit that convicts of sin. Not the KJV
I am not reading my Bible in english but in my mother tongue. But what this man says is so true. I see exactly the same thing in my own language in later translations. Thankfull to God for men like this.
The KJB is what was given to us in the English language. It follows the TR which is the inspired words of God passed down from the original authors.
If your mother tongue follows the TR, then you my brother have the inspired words of God as we do. Amen.
I've seen a
KJV/REINAVALERA (Spanish)
Amen! Just found this message. I agree.
So thankful for Dr Stringer’s clear presentation of truth. I too have, by nature, a rebellious heart that needs to be reined in by the pure Word of God as found in the KJV.
Be like David, and ask God to create in you a clean heart. Lay down your sinfulness at the foot of Jesus, and give up your Self once and for all. If you are born again, your "nature" is the nature of Christ. You are thus a "new creature," who no longer resides in Death and sin. You have been set free by your faith in what Christ did on the cross. You have died to Self, and put on "the new man." Believe what the bible says: You are free.
Which of the at least ten different revisions of the KJV is the so called "pure word of God"? Why do the KJV only cultists not speak in King James English? Yet they teach this KJV only heresy. Confining Almighty God to some archaic imperfect uninspired translation of scripture called the KJV.
Opposite day... why do some people idolize it ??
Amen, Society are in love with their own sin.
I have heard on RUclips that some of the verses in the KJB should not even be in, because they were not found in the original text any were.
Of course you'll hear plenty of people say stuff like that. The other versions go by corrupt manuscripts.
@@bobbyadkins6983 Thankyou, it has been a journey for me as a new Christian to have the correct word of God.
There is a Seventh Day Adventist (I’m not nor do anyone has to be), but my point is there is a lecturer named Walter Veith who did a series called Total Onslaught, and in that series he did two lectures called “Battle of the Bibles” that are really good on this subject. The later videos of the series is where it gets weird. The point to be made is this battle is at least as old as the New Testament itself.
Everything “they say” shouldn’t be in the Bible actually has Very Good evidence for its legitimacy. 1 John 5:7 being one of those. Many good videos on the historicity of this verse.
All the modern versions (250+) all come from corrupted manuscripts based on Westcott and Hort who made a "new" greek NT They were occultism, did not believe in the virgin birth, did not believe in salvation by grace through faith. It has since been revised again. They used the manuscripts that were found in the Vatican or a monastery. They are filled with errors, they don't even agree with each other. They have the apocryphal in them. They are all against the King James because it was from a different manusript-- the Textus Receptus.
@@bobbyadkins6983You certainly should not believe everything you hear. Especially the lies of the KJV only cult that say modern versions come from corrupt manuscripts.
I love being bound by it!!!
Dr. stringer I looked up what u said was in the Geneva Bible and couldn’t find it…btw I understand that the Geneva Bible was actually before the King James Bible is that correct? and I’m wondering what is wrong with the Geneva Bible ? Thank u
They never had trouble reading the KJB until a generation was raised on perversions.
As a choirboy in the 1950s I remember my local church changing to the NES. I was very disappointed to have to listen to a debased, unpoetic, faulty version. As time went on I noticed it had many errors and textural differences to the old bible.
Now, we have a plethora of versions to complicate and confuse the matter. Many people now just don't believe that God has given us a perfect bible.
Satan is delighted! I still use the sharp sword of the KJB, not to be confused by the so called NKJ, another faulty New Age Verion.
This could be why some Christian bookstores are closing?
What perversions are you taking about? Not the brilliant modern translations that God has blessed us with. So what perversions? Is that the typical ignorance of a KJV only cultist?
Howard Long, what perversions are they? Not the excellent modern translations God has blessed us with? Translated from earlier more accurate manuscripts, than the later manuscripts dedicated to the Pope used by the KJV translators. I believe in the perfect Word of God. His name is Jesus, the Word that became flesh and dwelt among us. If you mean is there a perfect translation of the scripture. There is not one. If there is, it is not in English. Certainly not the archaic English of the KJV, where so many words have changed meaning. Making the KJV even more inaccurate. Which is why God has blessed us with more accurate modern translations Satan has truly used the false teaching of the KJV only cultist to bring doubt on the word of God... Who vilify any other translation, calling them perversions, corrupt even sataniic. If it is not the their idol the KJV. Meanwhile God is using and blessing these transactions to bring many to Christ. Exposing what a blasphemous idolatrous cult the KJV only deception is.
Howard Long, what perversions are they? Not the excellent modern translations God has blessed us with? Translated from earlier more accurate manuscripts, than the later manuscripts dedicated to the Pope used by the KJV translators. I believe in the perfect Word of God. His name is Jesus, the Word that became flesh and dwelt among us. If you mean is there a perfect translation of the scripture. There is not one. If there is, it is not in English. Certainly not the archaic English of the KJV, where so many words have changed meaning. Making the KJV even more inaccurate. Which is why God has blessed us with more accurate modern translations Satan has truly used the false teaching of the KJV only cultist to bring doubt on the word of God... Who vilify any other translation, calling them perversions, corrupt even sataniic. If it is not the their idol the KJV. Meanwhile God is using and blessing these transactions to bring many to Christ. Exposing what a blasphemous idolatrous cult the KJV only deception is.
@@henrylaurel1188My previous post has seemed to have deleted,,or disappeared? If you want to know the truth, I’ll be happy to fill you in on the details? But the modern Church has been lied to(including myself), and I am angry about it! Having done much research on this topic.
Hi folks, at 35:20 mins in, Ps. Stringer says in the Geneva Bible read the footnotes in psalm 148, that they say its ok to execute the king. Welp I'm reading my geneva 1560, and I can't find it, did he misquote the verse number? Or perhaps is it in the 1589 version? I've read other shocking marginal notes in the Geneva, so I'm not surprised, but I just like to check these things.
You opened with mouthing reformed. You do know almost all the KJV translators were Calvinist right?
Hello! Praise JAH! Psalm 68:4 KJV and his name alone is the most high Psalm 83:18 KJV
powerful
4:52 min - Virginia Mollencott. Some NIV defenders say she was fired, she says she wasn't. The correctly phrased question to ask her would have been, "Did you involuntarily leave the NIV effort?" Also, did anyone bother to ask the NIV committee for their side of the story? Their website says that she was asked to leave. I've seen this many a time in the business world, "You're leaving us, which would you prefer on your resume, 'resigned from' or 'fired from'?" Many choose resignation to avoid being made a "leper" by termination. I am NOT saying that the NIV handled Mollencott that way, but I am illustrating how someone may be effectively fired without hearing "you're fired!" 8:50 min - Joseph Smith, JUNIOR, got the "revelations". Someone reported on his web site that Joseph Smith died in Nauvoo. Yes, a Mormon named Joseph Smith DID die there, Joseph Smith, SENIOR. However Joseph Smith, JUNIOR, the "prophet", went down in a blaze of glory at the Carthage, IL jail shootout. It is important to accurately identify which Joseph Smith to avoid mis-identification. Sadly, many writers are sloppy in this detail. But more importantly, while this deceiver claimed visitations, Mormon doctrine supposedly comes from golden "plates" buried some centuries earlier that only Joey, Jr. could translate. Sadly, Hebrews 11:4 held true for false doctrine
Exactly what was the purpose of this message?? There is no Scripture reading, no exegesis of the text and no glory to God. A total waste of my time.
Its more of teaching not so much a preaching message. Thats easy to see. Calm down
@jandasanders I have a problem with the KJV Only people. It caused an issue between me and my ex-wife back in the 1990's. I didn't even know it was a thing!!!!
@@kevinjodrey7664 I am Kjv only in thats what is study, read and get all doctrine from etc. but i dont believe you can only get saved from a KJV bible as long the person gets saved biblically. We talk in our own way to witness but our doctrine for salvation comes from the bible.
@@jandasanders That's where I get my doctrine from a well, but I use the NIV.
@@kevinjodrey7664 I use the NIV as well. Started using it long before I heard of the KJV only deception. No where is there a scripture that supports this KJV only teaching. So it should be rejected for the heretical teaching that it is.
A tutor in Classical Conversations in Raleigh North Carolina told her students that she hated the King James Bible.
Of course, it convicts her of sin, righteousness and judgment.
@@howardlong6735Amen!!!
@@howardlong6735All translations convict of sin when the Holy Spirit breathes on them. Just as he did before there was ever a KJV. After all the KJV is nothing more than a translation.
@@Harold-mb6sj False!
@@Harold-mb6sj Most modern bibles come from obscure so-called biblical manuscripts, known as the Alexandria/critical/eclectic text type. There are primarily three copies, and they not only have serious issues, but are corrupt, fraudulent documents! The KJB comes from TR/Majority text/Byzantine type text trace to Antioch in the 1st century AD as the only true Biblical manuscripts. Which is supported by the most ancient Bibles from the 1st & 2nd centuries AD(ie Syriac-mid 2nd century AD, Greek Orthodox NT mid-2nd century AD, and the Old Latin 90-130 AD). Then there are the scripture quotes of the early Church leaders(you can actually reconstruct the Bible with their quotes). All of these match together with the KJB. I'll explain more on the KJB later.
I don't have trouble with the King James Version. It is the KJV Onlyists who have so much trouble with our Bible.
Thank you this video helped me!
I have numerous proofs that the KJB verses are inspired, all 31,102 of them. Thanks for the video ^ In case you wanted/cared to know a small part of one example I have:
Do you have a proper/accurate word search program?
Type exactly "in", if your program is accurate it must include UPPER and LOWER CASE. There are 12,338 lower case, and 336 upper case. You should get 12,674.
Type exactly "earth"........................................ it must specify LOWER CASE. You get 985
(If you get 987, it’s because of the EARTH in revelation, and Earth in Genesis).
Type exactly "the"........................................... it must include UPPER and LOWER CASE. There are 17 with ALL CAPS, 62,173 lower case, and 1,851 upper case. You should get 64,041.
Type exactly “Amen”……………………………it must specify UPPER CASE. You get 77.
(If you get 78, it’s because of the lower case amen in Numbers 5:22).
Genesis 1:1 and Revelation 22:21 are the verses where these four words come from. This is proof verses are inspired. Every phone has a calculator. I'm not totaling this for people who don't care.
If your search program can specify what books of the bible you can search, specify only Genesis and Revelation:
Type exactly “in” your program must include UPPER and LOWER CASE. You should get 767.
(There are 754 lower case, and 13 upper case, in Genesis and Revelation).
Type exactly “amen” or “Amen”, there are no lower case amen in Genesis or Revelation. If you doubt God's word as I did, download King James Pure Bible Search and do this simple word search.
Jesus is our Amen. Jesus is in the earth. We are in the Amen. Revelation 3:14
●●●●
But if you want to skip software searches, just take your KJV book, and count the letters of each verse, (Genesis 1:1, Revelation 1:1).
Each verse also has exact letters. Each verse also has exact vowels. Each verse also has exact consonants. Each verse also has at least 4 other patterns I don't have space or time to expand on. The first verse of the KJV:
KJB Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Revelation 22:21 The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.
●●●●
"in" and "Amen", (both not Case Sensitive), with search scope in Genesis and Revelation only, will total 777 occurrences. Easily verified with King James Pure Bible Search!
●●●●
The KJB was first published in 1611:
Acts 16:11 prophecies the KJB in london if you draw a straight line from the two cities in that verse, Troas and Neapolis, the line will extend you right to Oxford and the middle of London. The line will keep going into the heart of the USA. The mountain paul uses to navigate to Neapolis is 1611 meters high, Samothrace.... also within that verse. Check it on Wikipedia: "Fengari" is the mountain. I know more patterns from that verse...verify it!
●●●●
(Also, the 777,777th word in the KJB is "love" in 2 John 1:6 "And this is love..."). God is love, (1 John 4:8)
What are the chances of all this? I have over 400 more of such examples, these are my personal favorites. No man who doesn't have the direction of the Spirit of God can do all this.
The percieved errors in the KJB are part of God's plan of faith. Its heartbreaking that people doubt God's power. The so called errors have many signatures of God built in them and form part of many patterns. The so called errors are not errors.
●●●●
When you search in KJPBS, each phrase occurance is counted, (Search scope is entire bible):
The Father (not case sensitive)=218 occurances
The Word (not case sensitive)=469 occurrences
Holy Ghost (not case sensitive)=90 occurrences
You will get=777
I am currently learning so much about the KJB from TruthisChrist on RUclips
webchannel.purebiblesearch.com
●●●●
"The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times."
Which is why there were 7 major English translations before the KJB. The KJV was commissioned in 1604 and published in 1611, exactly 7 years. Solomon, whose father spoke the verse above, built the temple in the 4th year of his reign and finished it in the 11th, 7 years later, 1 Kings 6:37-38. The spirit of God resides in this book as he did in the temple. And he will enter the temple of your heart if you let him build you and your ability to understand the bible too. Come back to your KJB, what little I read in it at least I thrive knowing the Spirit of God is in it.
●●●●
I can't help but share this...
2 john 1:6 contains the 777,777th word in the 1769 Cambridge Edition of the KJB...It is "love".
The 1769 Cambridge Edition totals the word count "in" + "earth" + "the" + "Amen" = 77,777, (from Genesis 1:1 and Revelation 22:21). Be careful of your search software and Case Sensitive is important, ("in" and "the" are not CS and "Amen" + "earth" are): use King James Pure Bible Search. It differentiates instances, such as two occurrences of "the" in one verse etc, instead counts individual occurrences. (Also "in" + "Amen" in Genesis + Revelation total 777). Check out TruthisChrist on RUclips for hundreds more.
(This is not Numerology, it's a fact that "Jesus" + "Jesus'" is in the bible 983 times, 3 are not speaking of Jesus the Christ: two of those reference Joshua of the old testament, (Hebrews 4:8, Acts 7:45), and one refers to a guy named Justus, (Colossians 4:11). Bar-jesus should definitely not be counted. So aside from this, every reference to our Saviour is 980 times, which is 70x7 + 70x7.)
Do you want to know what every capital name of God, like BRANCH, JAH, AND JESUS add up to when combined to "Jesus" and "Jesus'"? If you get 7781, you added 3 names of Jesus that do not refer to him and your software counts Barjesus, or you missed a capital names of God and Jesus. If added correctly, the 1769 KJB will give you a total count of 7777.
LORD = 6472
GOD = 310
I AM = 3
JEHOVAH = 4
JAH = 1
BRANCH = 2
KING = 5
JESUS = 6
Jesus = 967
Jesus' = 10
= 7777
Minus 3 antimentions and don't count Barjesus.
I am currently learning so much about the KJB from TruthisChrist on RUclips
webchannel.purebiblesearch.com
May God bless you
This is the case whereby someone lives by the letter of the law vs the spirit of the law...
These people need to repent ask God for forgiveness and accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior. Only the Holy Spirit is our counselor and truth.
The Bible was inspired by the Holy Spirit.
Are you a supporter of homosexuality? I hope not.
When anyone gets born again....
God - THE HOLY SPIRIT ( will Guide ) that person .......
And God Who declares "is no respector of person's ", isn't going to interact one way with one person, than with another
person.
Otherwise, God is the author of confusion.
I don't have any problem with the KJV but I have a lot of problems with the KJV Only nonsense as if it is the only valid version discounting any translations that came before or after. Nevermind those who don't speak English. Guess what. The Geneva bible is also God's word and predates the Anglican Authorized version.
I don't have any problem with the KJV either. If that is what some people prefer no problem But is the KJV only teaching nonsense? Not just nonsense but downright heresy. Personally I prefer modern more accurate translations in English I can understand.
NIV has 64,000 words missing and the list goes on and on. GENEVA WAS NEVER COMPLETE. Kjv is the 1st COMPLETE bible in the ENGLISH language 7th translation 1st completed! The bible even makes reference to the seventh translation. By the way you can get a k j v in every language😂👍
@@kylersmyangel Heard it all before. No words missing because older superior manuscripts were used that did not have these uninspired words Truth is the KJV using later manuscripts dedicated to the Pope. Had many uninspired verses added to it. Added by uninspired scribes. If the KJV cult was honest, they would know that. But nothing honest about the KJV only cult. Which is based on conspiracy theories, double standards and nothing but lies. To try and justify the KJV only heresy. Also could not care about the KJV in any language. I stopped reading this archaic imperfect uninspired translation years ago That was before I heard of the unbilical Christ dishonouring doctrine of devils called KJV onlyism
@@kylersmyangel Could be that the KJV has 64000 added words. After all the KJV was translated from later manuscripts. That is what happens when the KJV is treated like the standard. Rather than the imperfect translation it is. Untrue comments are made about the NIV having missing verses
Well said, Brother! I agree with you. That is simply the logic of it.
To claim the KJB contains no errors is arrogant! Why did The Translators use Titles for God and His Son, use a Greek name for our Jewish Savior? Why do Protestants violate the 3rd and 4th Commandment? Yahuah is the name of The Almighty!!! Yeshua is the name of Our Savior!!! Rome in AD 336 changed The Sabbath to Sunday and The Protestants gladly followed it, violating Yahuah's Commandment! The Translators said their work was not perfect and would need updating as time went by, read the Preface to the 1611 KJV, not the 1769 KJV we all use today, yes, it was updated, so, it was not without errors!!! Yahuah established The Sabbath, not The Church, back in Genesis! IFB believe they speak for Yahuah, but, they never preach from The Old Covenant, except The Psalms or Proverbs. They believe they do not have to obey The Law, although Yeshua was very clear to refute that, as was Paul. It is ok to use the other translations to compare word to word, and thank Yahuah for Bible Software which makes that easier. Finally, the Rapture Theory, came from a woman, not Scripture. When you try to prove this theory you have to take verses out of context in Paul's Writing in 2 Thessalonians, plus, disregard the earlier Prophets of the OT and look at Revelations as The Church not being mentioned. Unless you study prophecy correctly, you will believe a theory, Tim Lahey Fictious Movies and probably commit suicide when you realize you believed a lie.....you learn you are entering the Tribulation and have no money, no home, no job, no food, no friends, while your Pastor is probably in hiding or dead. Study to show yourself approved.....don't merely take the word of the man behind the pulpit, seeing you are meeting on The Roman Sabbath. Don't worship Yahuah's Holy Word!
❤❤❤❤❤❤
Hating the KJV is nonsense and an irrational repudiation of a good and solid translation. If you do not like the Old English use the New KJV. That aside, If one simply lesrned to read Hebrew and Greek this whole stupid and useless argument collapses like a cheap tent under an avalanche of snow. Translation method and the value of the KJV as a translation are two separate things. Mr Stringer in his sophistry has done a good job confusing and falsely integrating two distinct areas of study and concern. Typical KJV strawman and red herring arguments laid out here. For those familiar with the original languages, such rubbish is insulting and academically degrading. Perhaps the average English reader who has never bothered to learn any Greek or Hebrew in depth may be taken in by this pedestrian approach to an important subject but those who know better can only lament the great lack of learning and understanding that is commonplace in most evangelical Churches. Deal with the original text of scripture, sound hermeneutics and real honest exegesis and truly teach and impart saving truth and knowledge to the people of God. Defending a particular translation on such shaky ground and making an issue of it as if Gods plan of salvation is limited for the most part to one fallible translation and they are all subjected to the authority of the original text is vanity. Deal with the more pressing issues of translation philosophy and method or teaching Greek and Hebrew proper would go a long way in the building up and edifying of the body of Christ in their most holy and precious faith. That is what a true man.of God would be zealously interested in not this. Even the translators of the KJV would in no way glorify their own work and remove tjemselves to all of the advances that have come to the surface of the very vocabulary of the words of holy scripture and other items of an exegetical nature. One would think that Mr Stringer had wished that all forthcoming knowledge and scholarship would have ceased in 1611. The KJV men I am sure wouldn't agree or be satisfied that all efforts at translation improvement should not be welcomed and pursued. Outside of the English speaking world should the KJV be translated into other tongues? Another blow to the folly of this whole KJV thing. 29:28
You are...correct. But this man's audience would never consider such thi as, or have an original thought for that matter.
@teamrecon2685 the nkjv is not good. Don't recommend it to anyone
So thankful i was born after 1611. Otherwise, i wouldn't have the Bible.
Also shame about those who do not speak English. Especially the archaic English of the KJV. Obviously the only ones who have the truth are the KJV only cultist.
Are you serious???
@@Imsaved777 of course not.
Was waiting on an Ellen White comment. Please do yourself a favor and read The Great controversy, Desire of the Ages, Steps to Christ. Any one of those books and see for yourself what she has written about Jesus. He is God. He is the Son of God, equal to the Father. The Bible says if someone denies that Jesus is the Son of God, then there's a problem. She did the opposite. She lifted Christ up. She also pointed to her work as not as important as the Bible. And that if people were studying the Bible it would not have been necessary for them to read her books in the first place. As a researcher, go and read one of these books, and then come and leave me a comment here. I will be waiting. In her time there was only one other lady that published a lot of books. This lady known as Helena Blavatsky did the opposite of what Ellen White did. She said Lucifer was the light, she spoke on spiritualism, and lifted that up. She denied Christ as the Savior of the world. And so where God was doing a great work through one lady, satan was doing the opposite through another.
Your video is incompetent. I personally know, and have known thousands of believers who use non KJV English versions who do not hate the KJV. Also, they are not members of cults, or occult, they are mostly southern Baptists.
You clearly do not agree with the revisers of the Bishops Bible, the 1611 KJV translators, what they say and explain to the readers in their letter to the readers which is presently with held from KJV readers. Why is that letter with held from the readers? You must not know the history of the KJV Bible. You must not be aware that the Catholic pew Bible, the revised Bishops Bible called the 1611 KJV is nowhere near like the modern KJVs.
The KJVs today are not exactly the same. However, the doctrines taught in the NIV, ESV, NRSV, NET, NKJV, LSB, NASB, RV, AV, and others, are exactly the same doctrines found in the KJV. Your video is unmitigated deception. You are misleading our brothers and sisters in Christ.
@@Rightlydividing-wx1xb All of your information is absolutely incorrect! Most modern bibles like you mentioned are based on three obscure so-called manuscripts, that are actually fraudulent fake documents! Which I will show you how! The KJB that is used today is the 1769 update which was mainly spelling updates, and minor grammar only, that’s it! Otherwise it is the same as the 1611, minus the notes, and the apocrypha books which do not belong in the canon of scripture. I used the NIV(78&84), and the NASB(77&95) for more than 30 years, along with the KJB. With all the missing verses, words, phrases, passages, brackets, notes etc in most modern bibles, there is a stark difference, and they do affect, change doctrine! The KJB Bible, the reformed era Bibles, and a few recent additions, all come from the TR/Majority text/Byzantine type text. These are the only true Biblical manuscripts that traced to Antioch, and the first century. With an unbroken line that preserved the word of God. These are also supported by the multiple ancient Bibles in various languages from the 1st&2nd centuries AD. Then on top of that we have the scripture quotes from the early Church leaders( which you can reconstruct the entire Bible from them). All of these match up together, with the KJB! The are no errors in the KJB, none, zero. It’s not just perfect, it’s mathematically perfect! I’ll do more later.
I have attempted a few times to respond, and they keep disappearing? Most of what you mentioned is incorrect. I used modern translations for more than 30 years(specifically NIV-78&84, NASB-77&95), along with the KJB. There are stark differences because of the different textual basis that are used. With most modern bibles you do not have the full council of all of God's word, and there are doctrinal differences. The KJB that most people use today is the 1769 update, where spelling was updated, and some grammar, that's it!
@@claytonsmith6148There are no doctrinal differences in the more accurate modern translations. A blatant lie from a KJV only cultists. The NIV is far stronger on the deity of Christ and the Holy Spirit than the KJV. Also since when was the imperfect uninspired KJV the standard by which we judge other translations?
@@henrylaurel1188 I sent you two pretty detailed postings, not sure if you got them? They do not show on my end? Here are just two specific passages that affect doctrine, and one that makes Jesus a liar. 1 Corinthians 1:18 the KJB say's "are saved", modern bibles like NASB, NIV, ESV- say's "are being saved". The word "being" is not in the Greek, it is a modern revisionist addition, and did not exist prior to the mid-1800's. You are either saved or you are not saved, period! We do grow through sanctification, by the Holy Ghost/Spirit. Next: Acts 8:37 KJB shows a person must believe on the Lord Jesus Christ before being Baptized. NASB has it in brackets, brings doubt in God's word(just like the devil does in Gen 3:1), NIV just puts it in notes( most people don't even read the notes), ESV removes it all together(the devil is a thief, just like the birds in the parable of the sower). In John 7:8 KJB Jesus says "I go not yet unto the feast", the NIV says "I am not going up to this festival", hence making Jesus a liar!
@@henrylaurel1188 Just so you know the term KJV-only comes pretty much from the outside they don't refer to themselves in that way. They would say they are TR/Majority text/Byzantine type text only, and KJB preferred/best. Which is how I identify, but I do utilize other Bibles from these manuscripts: pre-KJB Reformed era Bibles, and there are more recent ones, the MEV, MLV, and WEB.
Okay a marginally better translation of of the Bible. Then the Geneva Bible it was to replace. However, History is on the side of the Douy Rhines Bible. Published before the KJV. And containing all 73 books of the canon as was originally agreed upon at the Church council at Carthage. Cruce Dum Spiro Fido.