I found this debate to be more a mutual appreciation of a man’s life and work than a discussion of the legitimacy of including the works of CLR James into the Literary Canon. That’s all well and good, and the debate does provide some fascinating insights into the character of CLR James and would prove invaluable to those starting off on a Jamesian odyssey. It may have been nice, though, to hear some of the notions problematising James’ inclusion.
I have 2 scrap books with CLR James handwritten letters, letters from priministers, publishing and newspapers clips. About 100yrs old. Who would be intrested in these? Thank you
I found this debate to be more a mutual appreciation of a man’s life and work than a discussion of the legitimacy of including the works of CLR James into the Literary Canon. That’s all well and good, and the debate does provide some fascinating insights into the character of CLR James and would prove invaluable to those starting off on a Jamesian odyssey. It may have been nice, though, to hear some of the notions problematising James’ inclusion.
I'm curious about what you mean by "Jamesian odyssey". Could you, if possible, elaborate on that please.
I have 2 scrap books with CLR James handwritten letters, letters from priministers, publishing and newspapers clips. About 100yrs old.
Who would be intrested in these?
Thank you
Me bro, are they still available?
Yeap.
@@mcconnellfamily4557 how can i contact you?
He cannot be included because he was a member of a collective deemed non human. That is the gist.
Paul A. Jules III is this true- what happened?