Alex Higgins was a tremendous player , he went for lunatic shots and got them . He was, also great at positional play and escaping from snookers , and a master at using side on the cue ball . He was ,in fact a skilled Billiards player .
A tremendous potter is Alex Higgins. He takes on the craziest angles and low percentage shots and consistently makes them. But how many times are these the result of his below average positional play? Time and time again in these clips he fails to get the white where it needs to be to facilitate the next shot. I actually find it hard to watch at times.
The pot on the green at 17.26 was magical and knowing if he missed it he could lose the match. You wouldnt see that pot in todays game. And the way he potted the blue to then move the pink over the middle pocket at the end bonus there was brilliant, in those days only a few players could do that pot. But the green pot maybe just 2 other players could have did that then and thats jimmy white and steve davis? But he would rarely go for it.
@mark.. In the 1970s the pockets looked smaller but alex still made it look easy. And the balls were heavier and the cloth made the game slower, apart from alex. I saw him play in 1975 against spencer i think and alex was potting long reds hard and against the cushions. It was as if he was playing in 1982. The crowd would go "wow" at first to me it seemend strange but then i rememberd the people had never seen these pots before. And it seemend the venues were alot smaller too, i just saw the 2 rows mainly, but i didnt even know how many rows there were. When they opend the crucible at sheffield you could see it was alot bigger and alot of rows, the top row could hardly see the table.
i love snooker as much as anyone. and i understand you can only be great in, or the best of your era, but the standard back here compared to now was diabolical really. greatest of respect to alex, and all the pros then, but it wasn't great.
That's not true, Higgins and Mountjoy would be able to compete in today's game, especially Higgins. There was nothing he could not do on a snooker table, players like Higgjns, Reardon and Spencer were more talented than most of today's players and when on form would be able to beat today's players.
a tad over rated for me Higgins. very astute player. but as a cubist and Potter not all that really. 2 time winner is very good. exceptional even. but outs him.mid pack which is bout right.
Part 2 on the weekend.
Higgins was the best ever , the skill of this man was immeasurable 👍
Alex Higgins was a tremendous player , he went for lunatic shots and got them . He was, also great at positional play and escaping from snookers , and a master at using side on the cue ball .
He was ,in fact a skilled Billiards player .
Oh yeah, the Mountjoy match. Very underrated this one. Higgins was magical throughout this whole championship.
RIP to both players.
"There's only one People's Champion, and you're looking at him." Alex Higgins.
This is a Classic
We want more videos like this one.
do you really. poor position and bad misses?
First Shot says it all.
Love from Pakistan
An absolute killer on the table just when his life depended on it the most, Alex was a rare breed indeed.
11:16 !!! he really just went for it
Thanks - very nice!
The only player to come close to being as brilliant as Ronnie!
I think that statement is absolutely miles off
@@Cowmilker98 Fair enough, am still sticking to it, tho!
Jimmy white was as amazing, too.
@@ihabiano no doubt and i like him too but theres something missing...the spark of genius, i think.
Class bloke,Doug Mountjoy
A tremendous potter is Alex Higgins. He takes on the craziest angles and low percentage shots and consistently makes them. But how many times are these the result of his below average positional play? Time and time again in these clips he fails to get the white where it needs to be to facilitate the next shot. I actually find it hard to watch at times.
Dont watch. Alex never worried about the white Ball because he could pot from any were.
Alex never cared too much about positioning cos he knew he could pot from anywhere lol
Mate spot on, then age and lifestyle caught up and he wasn't getting those pots when he lost position 👍
Great upload! And that bonus to close the vid - best three shots ever to win a frame?
That first shot
Yes he wasn’t consistent Alex. But when he was in the mood brilliant
Higgins escape at 11.15 enabled him to go on and win match and later,championship
GOAT
Higgins had such confidences and energy. Very sexy man!
The pot on the green at 17.26 was magical and knowing if he missed it he could lose the match. You wouldnt see that pot in todays game. And the way he potted the blue to then move the pink over the middle pocket at the end bonus there was brilliant, in those days only a few players could do that pot. But the green pot maybe just 2 other players could have did that then and thats jimmy white and steve davis? But he would rarely go for it.
Higgins absolutely just did not give a f***.
today every match looks same 100/90
Alex no one better.
Why Mountjoy's face is hidden?
Censured for smoking ;)
Bad image for snooker.
What stupid nonsense! Do people who smoke on the street have to be pixelated by law???
The balls Alex potted there is better as today s too players can in one frame
The players today wouldn't have taken a lot of those shots on .
@@linsayspence7070 yeah higgins potted some crazy balls
Those pockets are quite big. 😅
They are exactly the same size match pockets as used today.
@mark.. In the 1970s the pockets looked smaller but alex still made it look easy. And the balls were heavier and the cloth made the game slower, apart from alex. I saw him play in 1975 against spencer i think and alex was potting long reds hard and against the cushions. It was as if he was playing in 1982. The crowd would go "wow" at first to me it seemend strange but then i rememberd the people had never seen these pots before. And it seemend the venues were alot smaller too, i just saw the 2 rows mainly, but i didnt even know how many rows there were. When they opend the crucible at sheffield you could see it was alot bigger and alot of rows, the top row could hardly see the table.
long corner bank.. nobody's that good, c'mon
The Hurricane was ! He could do anything on a Snooker table 🤩
i love snooker as much as anyone. and i understand you can only be great in, or the best of your era, but the standard back here compared to now was diabolical really. greatest of respect to alex, and all the pros then, but it wasn't great.
the equipment today and conditions, including table cloth, are much easier to adapt to
Also the coaching and technique are almost robotic
Never mind the table cloth, have you tried playing snooker drinking the amount of alcohol those guys did? The new kids had it easy.
That's not true, Higgins and Mountjoy would be able to compete in today's game, especially Higgins. There was nothing he could not do on a snooker table, players like Higgjns, Reardon and Spencer were more talented than most of today's players and when on form would be able to beat today's players.
a tad over rated for me Higgins. very astute player. but as a cubist and Potter not all that really. 2 time winner is very good. exceptional even. but outs him.mid pack which is bout right.
very bad positioning