I totally agree and was just thinking the same thing. I think it has a lot to do with all the different areas of knowledge a seemingly simple sentence requires to fully unpack and grasp. From philosophy of language and formal logic to metaphysics and epistemology. I love when philosophical problems are deconstructed with strict analysis.
There is something beautiful and elegant about this kind of problem.
I totally agree and was just thinking the same thing. I think it has a lot to do with all the different areas of knowledge a seemingly simple sentence requires to fully unpack and grasp. From philosophy of language and formal logic to metaphysics and epistemology. I love when philosophical problems are deconstructed with strict analysis.
Muito obrigado, professor Cushing!
THANK YOU SIMON!!! This has been incredibly helpful! I might just pass my philosophy of language module after all :)
Fingers crossed
Damn i think i found something way more fun than continental philosophy xd thank you much for your work ^^
No matter so many times the same experiment (empirical) prooved right, it not prooved there exist a necessity suporting it.
Any sentence must be a relation univocal ( only) to its meaning in a phylosophical argument proposition
Thank you so much! This was super helpful.
so clear - thank you
Thanks a lot.❤
great video