hello, just want to say that i have been watching you guys for like two years now i think. And i really love your videos, so thank you and much love from SWEDEN.
I would personally take a shorter game, over a longer game, if the length is nothing but padding. However, if a game is gone to be short, it should be at a reduced cost. For a lot of people, $60-70 is a lot, so when they buy a game, they need it to be more then a flash in the pan. Even if it's fun. The issue is, so many publishers think their game should be full price, regardless. And since people value the amount of time a game is gone to last, when they can't afford to play a game, finish it in a couple hours and then go out and get another full price game, companies just bloat out their game to pretend it has enough content to warrant sitting right beside a game like Elden Ring or Breath of the Wild, for the same price. Nintendo's the worst offender. Especially with their new motto of release a game unfinished, add the rest later as 'free DLC'.
Игры
hello, just want to say that i have been watching you guys for like two years now i think. And i really love your videos, so thank you and much love from SWEDEN.
I would personally take a shorter game, over a longer game, if the length is nothing but padding. However, if a game is gone to be short, it should be at a reduced cost.
For a lot of people, $60-70 is a lot, so when they buy a game, they need it to be more then a flash in the pan. Even if it's fun.
The issue is, so many publishers think their game should be full price, regardless. And since people value the amount of time a game is gone to last, when they can't afford to play a game, finish it in a couple hours and then go out and get another full price game, companies just bloat out their game to pretend it has enough content to warrant sitting right beside a game like Elden Ring or Breath of the Wild, for the same price.
Nintendo's the worst offender. Especially with their new motto of release a game unfinished, add the rest later as 'free DLC'.