Galerkin method || Galerkin method boundary value problem
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 авг 2024
- Check out the link for Gauss forward interpolation method:
• Gauss forward interpol...
Check out the link for Gauss backward interpolation method:
• Gauss backward interpo...
Newton backward interpolation formula:
• Newton's backward inte...
Gauss Seidel Method:
• Gauss Seidel method ||...
____________________________________________________________________________________
There are more video on Methods of interpolation:
1. Newton forward interpolation
• Newton forward interpo...
2. Newton backward interpolation
• Newton's backward inte...
3. Gauss forward interpolation
• Gauss forward interpol...
4. Gauss backward interpolation
• Gauss backward interpo...
__________________________________________
1. Bisection method
• Bisection method | Bis...
2. Iteration method:
• Iteration method | fix...
3. Newton Raphson method
• Newton Raphson Method ...
4. Gauss Jordan Method
• Gauss jordan method
5. Gauss Elimination Method
• Gauss elimination meth...
_________________________________________
Do subscribe CIVIL LEARNING ONLINE for more engineering related videos.
____________________________________________________________________________________
I am from Ethiopia.I follow your video continuously. The way that you present is very comfortable.
In the (iii) equation it should be c2(-0.3) not c2(-3). thanks for the video
many minutes later... yes i also confirmed using software
Ya i also check c2 (-0.3)
Thanks ❤️🙏
Since it is C2(-3), what will be the new answer??
@@anittajose5821 I got C2 = -1.09 and C3 = -0.104
Thanks, it's so clear & simple!
Okay, this is good information. Simple and clear!!!!!!
Thanks from Colombia. Very well explained.
Welcome
Great teaching style
Thanks, explained with a very simple way
Your explanation Is really good
Sir your steps are right until #11:42. it should be -0.3c2 not -3c2. 1/5-0.5+1-1 is -0.3 not -3
Simply superb! Thanks..
thank you
Can we use 1st equation for last part ie y=co+c1x +c2x + c3 x3
To find y
How to solve if i have u(x,t) instead of y
Excellent sir
Thanks sir...
Great. Thanks for the video
Welcome dear
Good
weighting functions is it the derivative of dy/da1 and dy/da2 and dy/da3 .........
How to calculate C2 and C3
thank you so much!
Solving the equation for qN 3 & 4 , how did you calculate C2 and C3??
How to calculate C2 and C3
Very helpful
Thanks
Great help from this video. Thanks a lot... Can you please share the reference any book or paper where the method is being used in the way as you have explained in the video. Please
Currently the book is not available with me or I could have provided.
@@Civillearningonline Thanks for the reply, could you provide the name of the book ? It will be of great help , thanks in advance.
@@Civillearningonline please provide the name of the book.
@@RaoPriya_1212 it's numerical method in civil engineering by Ankita Sachdewa.
@@Civillearningonline thank you so much 🙏❤️
Thank you so much saved so much of my time and it's such a simple explanation 🫡🤗
Ye kya iska bhi answer hai....?Ques. 1. Solve the following boundary value problem by using the three weighted residual integration methods: Galerkin technique. Governing Differential Equation: (d ^ 2 * y)/(d * x ^ 2) + y = - 1 Subjected to: (i) y(0) = 1 and (ii) y(1) = 1 0 < x < 1
Approximate cubic order polynomial. You can choose any two collocation points within the given range of x.
thank you sir
Thank you
Welcome dear
amazing
have you solved any other problem using Galerkin method?
Yes. But I haven't uploaded them
How to Solve non linear equation using this method
Pizza ans in y"+y+1=0
bro you confused me with solving for C2 and c3
I got C2 = -1.09 and C3 = -0.104
0.0104
Same here ? -1.09
-0.0104
@@texon2clothes because 14:43 is wrong, C2(-3) is wrong, it should be C2(-0.3), and the final answer is C2=1.111111112, C3=0 (if the precision is higher)
Its VALUE !! NOT BHELU !!!!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
good explanation but your accent and pronounciation🤣
I am working on it for now making you understand matters.
Thanks, it's so clear & simple!
Thanks