Shark Stratos vacuum cleaner - HUGE MESS TEST!!! NZ860UKT

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 79

  • @LittleMommaVacs
    @LittleMommaVacs Год назад +11

    You are incredible like there’s no other words!!! Fantastic angles speed and mess!! You always amaze me!!!

    • @parwaz7861
      @parwaz7861  Год назад +2

      LM!!! How I’ve missed you, your lovely comment has made me smile thank you so much for the support 😁✌🏽❤️

    • @LittleMommaVacs
      @LittleMommaVacs Год назад +1

      I’m always watching just know that ❤️❤️ your welcome 🤗

    • @parwaz7861
      @parwaz7861  Год назад

      @@LittleMommaVacs God bless ❤️

  • @mrsf3241
    @mrsf3241 Год назад +6

    I had a cordless and shark sent me the new stratos with the clean sense it’s absolutely amazing my carpet looks like a new carpet. I have a German shepherd and not one single hair is in my carpet yet my other corded shark would still have hair. I’ve had problems with my corded with the suction so they’re now sending me this one. The new stratos ones seem amazing they pick up so much more as the suction is stronger.

  • @kellievacs7540
    @kellievacs7540 Год назад +4

    It’s nice to see a newer U.K model shark actually perform well

    • @RJA_World
      @RJA_World Год назад

      It didn't

    • @TheDAMills88
      @TheDAMills88 Год назад +4

      @@RJA_World IMO, it worked really well considering the test conditions it got put through! If your house looks like the above then maybe you should hover a smidge more.... Hes basically take it through what is essentially a woodworker's workshop with all them chippings and dust!. The cyclone feature has done it job like a normal cyclone would do in a workshop, Heavy objects fall to the base and the dust and lighter rise and taken away

  • @diamondpinkvacs2826
    @diamondpinkvacs2826 Год назад +4

    This was incredibly satisfying for me. Me personally I think the older sharks are better the newer ones are garbage.

  • @TheSicarioEbreo
    @TheSicarioEbreo 3 месяца назад +1

    My old 850uk broke and they are replacing it with this model. Good to know it performs great

  • @vacuumtests9225
    @vacuumtests9225 Год назад +13

    It looked very impressive at first, but then came typical Shark problem. Cyclone is designed to push dirt upwards and it failed. I have experienced the same issue with my Sharks. For normal use it's ok. Bagless Electrolux what I just bought has horizontal cyclone separate from bin. It hardly clogs ( I had similar Electrolux in the past), but some dust still make it to the pre motor filter. I really like your filming style and editing! Although this is extreme test what people never does in real life. However I do these test and same happens :D

    • @parwaz7861
      @parwaz7861  Год назад +4

      Yes!!! I was impressed at how well it did at first but then got frustrated with how it kept losing suction, had to have another vacuum plugged in to clean the Shark out including the filters 😂
      Thank you for the awesome supportive comment regarding my filming style/editing! I try! ✌🏽

    • @nikkibasmr
      @nikkibasmr Год назад +9

      In real life people arent cleaning up messes like this so with regular use and filter cleaning it shouldn't lose suction right?

    • @parwaz7861
      @parwaz7861  Год назад +2

      @@nikkibasmr Correct, unless they have a lot of dust in their carpets from using an inferior or old worn out vacuum for a while the filter can still clog unfortunately, maybe on the first use or after a few uses
      But as long as the filters are clean the suction should remain strong (along with the seals being in good condition too)
      Usually with sharks the filters almost definitely have dust on them after a single use due to their single cyclone design (2 cyclones minimum are needed for optimal dust filtration)

    • @vacuumtests9225
      @vacuumtests9225 Год назад +2

      @@nikkibasmr Indeed yes!

  • @carpetliness
    @carpetliness Год назад +4

    Those clean passes!!!! 😱😱😱😱😍😍😍😍😍

  • @zuhrahakikialokzai2189
    @zuhrahakikialokzai2189 Год назад +5

    So satisfying to watch ❤

  • @ruthanneluvsvacuuming6653
    @ruthanneluvsvacuuming6653 Год назад +3

    I definitely get it
    There’s lots of annoying things about the Shark Duo Clean Lift-A-Way vacuum cleaner I have

  • @nikkibasmr
    @nikkibasmr Год назад +2

    This is exactly the type of mess I love. Teach me this magic!

  • @thecrunchyvacuumasmr
    @thecrunchyvacuumasmr Год назад +3

    Wow that did a good job!

  • @alexvega7527
    @alexvega7527 Год назад +3

    I would love to see a oreck with a mess test like this ❤🎉

  • @godfirstforever27
    @godfirstforever27 3 дня назад +1

    ❤❤❤❤

  • @shanelankford8985
    @shanelankford8985 Год назад +4

    You do realize that if the bin is full, it’s going to overflow into the cyclone correct???

    • @parwaz7861
      @parwaz7861  Год назад

      I hadn’t overfilled the bin - the filter clogged way before the bin filled

  • @paulillingworth1242
    @paulillingworth1242 Год назад +4

    Looked amazing, until we see the state of the filters, the same old Shark issue, dreadful dust separating, Dyson and vax air are much better than a shark , good video 👍🏽

    • @thevacuumnerd
      @thevacuumnerd Год назад +1

      I do agree with your statement, I used to be a fan of Shark but have gone back to bagged vacuums due to my severe allergies. Sharks filtration is sub par, Dyson isn't any better tho, they claim to have hepa filtration but when its tested their filtration is terrible, Dyson doesn't have a sealed filtration as they claim they do like most companies. Just check out a Dyson vacuum filtration review on Vacuum Wars and he will prove they don't have a sealed system like they claim. I haven't used a Vax brand before so I cant say anything about that butt they look like good vacuums

    • @danwarb1
      @danwarb1 3 дня назад

      ​@@thevacuumnerd They do have sealed HEPA filtration. So do these Sharks. The difference is Dyson has better cyclone filtration/more cyclones to filter out finer dust. So Shark filters clog a lot faster.

  • @SkullyRox
    @SkullyRox Год назад +1

    Gosh this was satisfying

  • @suthrnqt
    @suthrnqt Год назад +1

    As usual, awesome mess test!

  • @themind2350
    @themind2350 Год назад +2

    Sebo X range or the Happy Henry are more suited for these types of heavy dust cleaning.

  • @kieransvacs4545
    @kieransvacs4545 Год назад +6

    Can see the appeal of sharks to general consumers of being a compact upright vacuum that just eats anything cause of duo clean aswell as looking nice obviously the cons being completely disposable terrible cyclones and massive unreliability aswell as being built worse then a casdon toy dyson

    • @kieransvacs4545
      @kieransvacs4545 Год назад

      @@lina.luna98 depends what your looking for if you want a upright I’ll suggest a sebo model there’s many to choose from for different applications they are reliable and good performers or if you want a bagless model there’s also the new dyson balls which are great vacuums too. If you want a cylinder there is Miele or numatic Henry’s which are both powerful and durable vacuums

  • @richwilliams9895
    @richwilliams9895 Год назад +3

    You and performance reviews both have highlighted the very problem with shark vacuums. So it makes me wonder why other places bang on about how brilliant the shark is. Or is it because they only test it picking up small amounts of hair, cheerios and a little bit of sand and that’s it. Say it’s brilliant due to the clever lift away design and the 2 rotating bars.

  • @sharadaramdhan5016
    @sharadaramdhan5016 Год назад +1

    Oooo that’s crunchy

  • @vacuumsensation
    @vacuumsensation Год назад +1

    Amazing video!!

  • @LiftEnthusiast2020OFFTOPIC
    @LiftEnthusiast2020OFFTOPIC Год назад +1

    Shark also makes the Nutri Ninja blender which is also abysmal.

  • @clarindagalletta278
    @clarindagalletta278 4 месяца назад

    One thing I’d never pick that up in my new Vaccume. That’s crazy

  • @theupfolds2814
    @theupfolds2814 Год назад +1

    Do you think you do the same test with George. It would be interesting. Looks like the Shark is failing miserably, thats why older Dysons are better.

  • @justplanes-roblox3071
    @justplanes-roblox3071 Год назад +1

    Does your carpet not go really bad condition if you pour all this mess?

    • @parwaz7861
      @parwaz7861  Год назад

      Nope, as long as it’s vacuumed properly with a good vacuum it’s absolutely fine

  • @Sh3lShock
    @Sh3lShock Год назад +2

    You should have swept most of that up before vacumming. DIY: How to Kill a Vacume

  • @dbman992
    @dbman992 Год назад +3

    You guys must have vastly different models in the uk to over here in the US. That's not a Stratos, that's a vertex with a red floor nozzle. The Stratos over here has a totally reworked cyclone, bin, and motor and looks completely different. They did the same thing a while ago with the apex where they gave it the updated vertex blue floor head and painted it a different color.

  • @maximusvr46
    @maximusvr46 Год назад +1

    does this have a 750w or 800w motor?

    • @parwaz7861
      @parwaz7861  Год назад +1

      I don’t remember, but I can’t imagine 50W making much difference

  • @tamiwatson3430
    @tamiwatson3430 Месяц назад +1

    Your filling up the dust cup too much. That's why it's getting debris caught up top like it is.

  • @hibtl8510
    @hibtl8510 Год назад +3

    hear me out , this mess with a hoover turbopower

  • @rudexbruiser2604
    @rudexbruiser2604 Год назад +1

    I think sharks were a bit better back then. Even without the duoclean and zero m tech.

    • @Frenchfrys17
      @Frenchfrys17 Год назад

      Sharks are not meant to have their bin get that full. Once you cross the fill line, the entire filtration will catastrophically fail. Empty the bin before the garbage crosses the max fill line and the vacuum will work like a charm.

  • @duanehovenga2965
    @duanehovenga2965 Год назад +3

    Unfortunately some things are garbage. Much rather have a dyson for that mess or even a henry.

    • @marcbaigrie2295
      @marcbaigrie2295 Месяц назад

      Dysons are the worst vacuums going. Absolute waste of money.

    • @duanehovenga2965
      @duanehovenga2965 Месяц назад

      @@marcbaigrie2295 I do agree.

  • @jeffpatrick3858
    @jeffpatrick3858 9 месяцев назад +1

    thank you with the get a dyson there so much better

    • @jeffpatrick3858
      @jeffpatrick3858 9 месяцев назад +1

      my shark failed to sepreate the durt and it is so anoing

  • @LiftEnthusiast2020OFFTOPIC
    @LiftEnthusiast2020OFFTOPIC Год назад +1

    4th and hello

  • @levigaming-1
    @levigaming-1 Год назад +1

    another plant pot mess?

    • @parwaz7861
      @parwaz7861  Год назад

      The shark stood no chance with real household dust unfortunately

    • @levigaming-1
      @levigaming-1 Год назад

      My v15 broke *sigh* well the filter did

  • @jtvacuumandasmr8530
    @jtvacuumandasmr8530 Год назад +1

    Omfg🤤🤤🤤

  • @helensvacuumingforYou-Me
    @helensvacuumingforYou-Me Год назад +2

    Here 😁😁😁😁😁

  • @ztbi
    @ztbi Год назад

    This video is worthy of recognition in the archives of the Jedi Order.🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @jesclio
    @jesclio Год назад +2

    ❤❤