The Risinger Build: Episode 1 - Pre-Construction Planning
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 апр 2024
- Join Matt Risinger, builder in Austin, Texas, as he embarks on a groundbreaking project, documenting the entire construction process of a high-performance family home. In collaboration with Builders FirstSource, this 24-part series promises to revolutionize residential building, showcasing innovative digital tools and cost-effective strategies.
In this episode, Matt introduces the project and its objectives, emphasizing the importance of meticulous pre-construction planning. With architect Steve Baczek, they delve into site considerations, budget-conscious design principles, and unique challenges posed by this Austin landscape.
Throughout the video, Matt and Steve discuss key decisions, such as preserving the existing slab foundation to accommodate Austin's stringent tree protection regulations and leveraging Builders FirstSource's digital tools for comprehensive project management. From optimizing floor plans to addressing plumbing concerns, every aspect of the build is meticulously analyzed, setting the stage for a transformative construction journey.
Don't miss this immersive experience as Matt Risinger and his team redefine homebuilding standards, offering viewers unprecedented access to industry-leading practices and cutting-edge technology. Stay tuned for future episodes, where the vision of The Risinger Build comes to life, inspiring builders and homeowners alike to rethink the possibilities of residential construction.
Learn more about Builders FirstSource: www.bldr.com/who-we-are?...
Subscribe and follow my Podcast on Apple or Spotify!
Apple: apple.co/32AOwgU
Spotify: spoti.fi/3FXNg4X
Sign up for our twice-weekly newsletter:
buildshownetwork.com/newsletter
To sponsor a video or advertise with us visit:
www.buildproductions.com
Want to learn more about building? thebuildshow.com/
The Build Show on Instagram: / thebuildshow
The solution for your water lines is install 2" conduit in the slab with electric sweeps then you can pull pex lines just like wire that gives you replaceable plumbing
I've been using this method for 25 years
Take care Ray
On your water lines you want to install as many water lines in the slab. Installing 2" conduit in the slab it takes a fraction of the time and labor. Just install conduit in the trench and pull pex later
By putting pex in pipe you protect it and it will be replaceable
Does the pex move inside the conduit when water flows through it?
You can also install your first floor electrical home runs 3/4" conduit directly on the slab you can also install a central vacuum system and 2" conduit stubbed up under the bathrooms and kitchen toe kicks to run hydroponic lines for toe kick heaters all in the slsb
All for a fraction of the cost and time saving you money
Take care Ray
You have an opportunity to do good things for the cost of conduit and a few hours of labor and once you pour slab you will have alot of your electric and plumbing installed even before you put up a single piece of lumber
Doing this will save you a ton of money
More stuff
Run conduit for hot tub outside
You can also sleeve your gas line in 2" conduit to the stove ,outside BBQ and backup generator. Fire pit Elon musk house mounted flame thrower
Let me know what I missed
Wish I could get my builder to see this logic. Trying to get him to look at things like this BEFORE getting started.
@@mikeh.3855 I don"t get why here construct to the deconstruct to add something and never look the same.
You have those who think about everything and them do something with very low resistance in construction . Those who just start doing stuff and start "fixing" problems on the way.
This is what I’ve been waiting for from Matt. I understand he’s more of a custom homebuilder, but I’d like to see costs and the way things are supposed to be done the right way.
Random thought out of nowhere: there's two types of career parents: those that really hope their kids will follow them into their career, and those that tell their kids "never be a _".
I feel like Matt's very much the first sort. You can tell he's passionate about quality building and would love if one or more of his kids picked up on that passion. It will be a delight if we get to see the next generation of Risinger Builders in years to come!
Good for Austin for treating trees appropriately. They are certainly more valuable than gold in developed/developing neighborhoods at regulating temperatures, weather mitigation, maintaining equilibrium with local natural ecosystems, water and air quality, etc etc. When everyone has the same "oh I'm just removing ONE tree" attitude, entire landscapes go barren and bad things happen.
My city values it's trees at 4 to 12 thousand each depending on size. You get fined if any are damaged during construction.
@@MushroomMagpie PUMP THOSE NUMBERS UP! 😀
.... That's great though, more cities need to hold true to sustainability initiatives in the face of hyper development. Good design incorporates green space, not negates it.
I disagree. It's already hard enough to find a good site to build, when taking into consideration the budget, location, etc. When you're searching for what seems like forever, and then you finally find some property that would be otherwise perfect other than the fact that as little as a single tree is in the wrong place on the property.
Rather than just banning people from cutting down trees which could render some properties useless, the better solution that some jurisdictions use is to offset any cut down trees. So for every tree you cut down, you're required to plant (or pay a fee to the city/county so they can plant) a certain amount of new trees, to make up for it. If you cut down an older/bigger tree, you might have to plant several younger smaller trees to make up for it, or if feasible, a single older larger tree equal to the one cut down.
@@00HiGhGuY00 if I'm understanding your complaint correctly, you're saying that you're frustrated because conservation of a limited finite rare resource (mature trees) is creating another limited finite rare resource (lots to develop). Yea. That's exactly the case. You nailed it. Crazy, isn't it? Unfortunately, you find fault with the tree, not with our lust for land appropriation. Which is why, rather than avoiding the challenge of tree conservation, we need to embrace incorporating better site development design. To address your proposed mitigation solution directly, unfortunately there is no substitute for a mature tree. 50x baby trees do not provide the habitat, water/air purification, shade, wind resistance, etc of 1x mature tree. And NO dollar figure ever will. Even more concerning is your statement that a property that cannot be developed due to trees would be considered "useless". That is a frightening stance! Parks? Nature preserves? Forests, wildlife sanctuaries, land stewardships, all useless?? Have you considered WHY an undeveloped tree-filled lot in a residential neighborhood increases the neighboring property values?
@@Bythirteen You stated that there is no substitute for a mature tree, and that mature trees are a limited finite rare resource. That is completely false. perhaps you're unaware of this amazing ability trees have.... They grow. That's why wood products are considered a renewable resource because when they go cut down an entire forest, they are planting several more forests, that then mature, and the cycle repeats. Of course, we're not talking about cutting down entire forests, we're talking about the case of removing a small amount of trees from a plot of land in a suburban area, zoned for residential use. That much should already be implied given the context of the conversation in relation to what was said in the video. Habitat is not going to be affected by removing a few trees on a residential lot to build a house. Plant life cleaning the air happens as part of photosynthesis. there's a direct correlation between the amount of "green matter" or vegetative growth and the amount of photosynthesis happening. It makes no difference if that photosynthesis is happening as the result of one large tree or many small trees. The amount of water purification that happens as the result of trees is negligible. Far more water is purified by evaporating into the air and then raining back down, also mechanical filtration by soaking into the ground. Regardless of the trees, you're not going to have a park, nature preserve, forest, wildlife sanctuary, etc. on a relatively small plot of land in the suburbs zoned for residential use. Properties adjacent to an undeveloped lot (tree filled or not) adds value, at least temporarily, because it's more desirable looking into an empty lot rather into your neighbors window. But just because a lot might be empty when you move into a house, doesn't mean it's going to stay that way forever. That is something you will have to factor in when deciding to purchase said house. But really that doesn't even have anything to do with tree preservation. The bottom line is if you grow more trees than you cut down, it's going to be a net positive gain. If you want to buy a lot to build a house and there is a tree or even several trees located at inconvenient locations on said lot, you should be allowed to cut them down, build your house, and then plant several more trees/shrubs/plants on your property in a more convenient location. I guarantee you the eco system is not going to collapse, the water and air is not going to turn toxic because there's a few less trees to filter the air/water, your neighbors house is not going to get sand blasted because of the reduced wind resistance, the earths temperature is not going to rise because of a little less shade, the value of your neighbors' houses are not going to plummet because there's a few less trees in your yard.
Right off the bat Steve’s hitting on the Principle of Conformity. Excellent! This is the basis of home valuation.
The principle of conformity states that maximum value is realized when a reasonable degree of architectural homogeneity exists and land uses are compatible. This principle implies reasonable similarity, not monotonous uniformity, tends to create and maintain value. The highest and best land use is generally realized under circumstances of conformity or harmony. The principal purpose of zoning regulations and private deed restrictions is to maintain conformity.
@@ryanbailey6600 Screw it. I would put an Ultra -Modern house on that lot. If the neighbors don't like it they don't have to look at it or live in it.
@@lrc87290 You have to take into consideration the Principles of Progression and Regression also...
The principle of progression states that the value of a less-expensive property is likely to increase when placed in an area with high-end properties. The value of the property increases because the neighboring houses are worth more.
The principle of regression is a term used by real estate appraisers stating that the value of high-end real estate may be diminished by having lower-end properties in the same vicinity. This principle is used frequently in writing zoning laws, which strive to keep business and residential areas separate.
Good to see another build from ground up. Studpack has a good series too
Studpack makes me tired! 😂 they do so much, just the 2 of them!
@@toomanymarys7355 what about my man RAD!?? lol There are 3 of them!
THIS , is what we need to see. A (high) perforamnce house on a regular budget. aka.... how house should be built for everyone
Finally! That is all I have to say about BIM! I personally started in BIM in 2012 with DDS-CAD. No one knew what it even was. I work with REVIT for all my Archecture, Structural and MEP design. Look forward to seeing more of the "tools" BFS offers using the "Autodesk" engine.
I'm not in the trades but I'm extremely excited for this series! I dream to be able to build a custom home up to the quality of what's shown by Matt and his team. I know I'll never be able to afford a Risinger build but this series should be able to give me perspective on what a realistic goal would be for me.
This series has me watching. Its a house very much like what I intend to build for myself, only change being in Colorado here I'd want a basement But this build is like;y going to show me what I'm in for when the time comes.
Great. I’ve been waiting for one of these from you. I have watched Essential Craftsman, Perkins Brothers and others do whole house build series and love them. Glad to get your perspective!
I found this channel directly as a result of that Essential Craftsman start to finish build left me wanting more.... science?... and less....tradition?
Finally Matt! Can’t wait to see and hear all the details on this new build!!!
Austin is smart to preserve those trees. I hate how my neighborhood has had all the trees decimated, it's so sterile.
Love the idea of being able to purchase these plans for a future build!
Protecting trees is really important for flood prevention. I grew up in Houston. I don’t remember flooding being an issue until like 2014. Anytime it rained hard, there would be no school the next day bc it flooded. I just went back 6 months ago and all the trees are gone. It also darn near floods every time it rains hard.
Excited for this one. I'll be following along!
Christmas in April!!! I've been waiting for this for a long time! Thanks so much for this series. Super excited to learn more about the entire process!
excited for this series!
Exciting!
This is going to be awesome!
Matt longtime fan...been putting together our next build build binder for the new place. We're going digitalbthis time with the whole project management👍🏼
You guys are the best!
This should be good. Follerin'.
Awesome! TY! ❤
ALRIGHT!!!
People should understand Builders First Source charge about $10,000 per house, give or take to use that software that they are discussing which is after the Architect and prior to Construction. And adds several months to the process.
More proof to the saying There-s no such thing as a free lunch.
Does it end up providing savings in other areas?
I wouldn’t imagine it takes 2 months if you order one of the plan sets on their website though.
A basic Bazcek?
Are you planning to reveal what the modest budget is for this build at some point? Looking forward to watching the entire process and learning what I can from it, but if your idea of a modest budget and mine are worlds apart then it may not be as practical for me.
instead of 2 million it's 1.7 😉
I try to watch and see what I can afford to incorporate. Although he lost me at Steve B for the architect! I am pretty sure he is out of my price range.
@@JosiahK555 😂
@@xokissmekatexo but if his plans are being made available, that's a plus. I'm hoping to see more of this in the future as pre-made plans you can modify would be less expensive than custom plans from the start.
Matt’s generation is very different from todays generation, hopefully he’s transparent with all the real costs of building this home. Costs to build a home are not some big secret but it’s always interesting to watch people try and inflate the numbers thinking that they are fooling everyone.
People need to hire Architects. They are worth the added costs.
I prefer a draftsman and to just self manage
Naaahh. Why not let the neighbours partake in my poor design choices?
Unfortunately this house looks like it was designed by a builder, not an architect-at least on the exterior design. The plan layout is nice.
I have spent over 300k with BFS last year, I am contacting them today about accessing these tools. Excited to see how this series go, super informative.
The music choice is so 🔥
I've grown up with basements and always liked their utility but I would absolutely trade a basement for super stable ground. Can't wait to watch you guys build a "normal" house!
Ground is quite stable with a basement. Your just chaninging where the foundation starts. If anything it will be on harder ground deeper.
@@1014pI think you’re missing @Deuce’s point. I took it that he lives in a place with poor soil where you have to excavate down to get to good bearing capacity and probably to get below a fairly deep frost line. May as well go down a few more feet while you’re at it and build a basement. Whereas in Austin, you often have solid bedrock just 6-12” below existing grade. That’s why most everything is built slab on grade in Matt’s neck of the woods.
@@1014p You would think so, but the '70s houses here in New England say otherwise.
Really looking forward to this series Matt. I will be showing this to my students. for sure. I do have a side question that someone may be able to answer: How do you know it is a rebar slab compared to a post-tensioned slab? Is that from the original drawings of the house?
Very excited to see this series. Despite what my RUclips name is, I have been designing homes for over 30 years and I was an innovator for digital drafting early in it's introduction (think AutoCAD 2 or 9), so I am very interested to see the new technology and what I have missed out on as an old guy!
❤
This is going to be a great series. I like how the architect looks at the neighborhood and tries to make the house fit into it. My parents neighborhood, 60s block track homes a builder is coming in bulldozing the houses, and building 5000 SQ foot Mc mansions, stick frame and stucco construction the homes look so out of place and they are ruining the neighborhood. Here in Scottsdale they are selling them for around two million dollars. It’s sad
Thank you for that. Exactly. I see what you describe all the time. A neighborhood that flowed beautifully now looks disjointed. The cities should do a better job at controlling the public face...
This dude can hit falsetto about 3 times a show
Looking forward to seeing start to finish on a more affordable build, although I suspect your use of Steve Baczek as architect and BSF’s digital tools are at a steep discount not available to the rest of us. Regardless, I’m always looking for a more affordable path to a high-performance home and trust I will pick up some tips and tricks along the way. It should also be interesting to see how Steve’s approach to designing a home in a cooling-dominated location differs from his approach in his typical heating-dominated locales of New England. Cheers!
be interested in details how you deal with heritage trees, have a build coming and want to preserve as many heritage trees as possible
I’ve watched the episode on the digital tools, and I’ve gone to the Builder’s First website and watched the videos. I still don’t have an idea of what really is included in the plans and how much it will cost-how do they deal with local permits, if they can at all.
So funny to Australian eyes, all those black window frames. Black finishes cause surfaces to absorb a lot more heat in hot weather, and too much absorbed heat will cause the materials to expand and buckle. It's nice to get a visual contrast between these components and the wall surface, but we try to do that in as light a colour as we can achieve, not black. My house is cream with light blue trim, and it has all the contrast and detail I want - but it doesn't cook in summer.
Unrelated to this video, but Mr. Risinger do you have an update on how the NuvoH20 water softner is performing for you after 2+ years? I haven't found any follow-up you've done since and I was wondering what the pros/cons are after using it more extensively. Love to hear back on this subject. Thanks.
It’s been fantastic at my house. Zero issues with scale or deposits. I’m a fan of
@@buildshow Awesome! Thanks for the update. This knowledge helps.
As much as I dearly love a basement, I can't disagree that slab on grade directly on top of solid bedrock makes for an inarguably solid house.
I'm curious, which states use bricks and mortar to build houses ?
There’s no stronger building code in the country than Florida’s. The least expensive house in South Florida is generally still built with concrete, block, and stucco.
What’s the budget?
At least this one is not called a redmodel 😂😂😂
Replaceable plumbing why would you not want that
Looks like 850k - 1.15 million budget if I were to guess.
Guess I know where not to build my house, I want a basement.
Can a non builder use that software! I want to use it!
I think they charge around $10,000 dollars per project, give or take.
That price though saves by design, also deters DIY?
$3000/yr* you really have to be in the business for it to make sense
I could by autocad for that price. Lol
Dusted off some old plans from 1984 I see. 😂
Yup. There’s only so many ways to design a house.
@@seanm3226 Sure but that's a house designed by an engineer and not someone who understands or appreciates architectural beauty.
I think you’re two decades late-more like 1964.
Starting to see your hair turn Grey Matt...
Such a distinguished gentleman now 😊
i never did like the idea of appeasing neighbors w a custom home design. it should be to the home owners likes not the nosey neighbors. a bigger or better home will increase ALL the property values in the neighborhood
I guess it depends on what they mean. I agree mostly, however there are so e crazy out of place stuff built. Its not good crazy either. Hearing what he is saying, disagree with him. If you can build a better home inside with improved methods. You do that as its not like the outside will be totally different.
From a real estate perspective, you never want to have the nicest house on the block. Of course there are exceptions to every rule and that decision is very location specific for a variety of reasons.
@@MichaelJ674 I reckon what we're going for is something that isn't eyecatching on the outside, but performs to the highest achievable standard inside. Yes, you're going to miss out on some resale value if it's surrounded by lower-value houses, but resale value can't take away the pleasure of living in a house that works how a house should work.
If the past 4 years have taught us anything, is that the average idiot will pay 100s of thousands over the original build price for an old, beat up home needing repairs without an inspection. A "nonconforming" custom home is the least of anyone's concern
No, your assertion doesn't always "improve" the neighborhood. I see homes built that completely conflict with the existing environment. No reason to disrupt the flow and form of the existing neighborhood.
"Modest" budget...so that means $1M instead of $2M?
Matt says no super expensive architect, yet hires an architect. Thst 3D software has been used for 10 years. Revit.
Having an architect who knows what they are doing adds tremendous value.
And then you can buy his plan for $1800! What a bargain!
@colinmendelowitz249 architect plans are copy write. I agree an Architect adds a ton instead of letter a builder play designer. Systems are far too complicated now and codes necessitate it I think.
Don’t think for a second that Matt paid full price for his Buddy Steve and the other architects are in house which means steeply discounted. For the rest of us, this would be a super-expensive team of architects.
Did @studpack inspire this? I feel like stud pack inspired this. Either way, I’m here for it. You should have them on an episode.
Risinger will take the entire budget of the stud pack dream house and build a bathroom with it and it will be a half bath.
@@AbRa285 Bahahaha, that's no lie!
Perkins Builder Brothers do start to finish also. Love the personalities on those shows too.
Definitely Perkins Builder Brothers and RR vibes. I’m here for it.
Awesome Framers are fun, too, especially if you live in the Pacific Northwest where they are located. They have several full builds in their video archives.