Ruby FPV with OpenIPC hardware

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 дек 2024

Комментарии • 10

  • @unixoid33
    @unixoid33 21 день назад +2

    lots of red and green bars. although considering that you flew behind the house and the shed and the video was stable very well.

    • @mihavuk
      @mihavuk  21 день назад

      @@unixoid33 thanks for the comment. Yes, it is surprising me also how stable it is. DJI V1 and Walksnail are struggling a lot around that shed in the corner and behind metal garage.
      I will fly Ruby more on other locations and probably make another video or 2 in the future, as much as time and weather permits. I also have an idea for very reasonable priced HDMI goggles experiment in mind, waiting to arrive from China.

  • @petrusoroaga6528
    @petrusoroaga6528 21 день назад +2

    Love the scenery! You live in a very nice place :)
    You should see my flying skills: without GPS and loiter mode, and max 10km/hour with no obstacles closer than 10m away, I'm lost, I can't fly, too stressfull :)))
    I noticed those bottom breakups on OpenIPC hardware (only) too, while on bench. And same behavior: it goes away as soon as I go outside. I think it's too much tx power and the rx gets overloaded. Or I overloaded the OpenIPC CPU too much, or something. I'll figure it out.

    • @mihavuk
      @mihavuk  21 день назад

      @@petrusoroaga6528 thank you very much for your comment, much appreciated. 👍👌
      I'm sure you will only make Ruby even better and even more mature than it already is.
      Link is really solid, Walksnail and DJI are struggling a lot behind that shed in the corner and behind metal garage. With analogue, you are totally blind there.
      I wouldn't fly it like that and above houses if I didn't have pretty high trust in the system. Although, it wouldn't be the first time for me climbing on the tree or my or neighbor's house roof to retrieve the quad. 🤣😅😉
      I'll fly Ruby more, on other locations, as much as time and weather permits. And probably make another video or 2.

  • @5c1t4l3
    @5c1t4l3 21 день назад

    Really good link; compared to what us analog 2018 hobbyists are still used to. What would you say the fps is at, roughly? I saw it's capped at 90 in settings but what's it actually getting?
    Also, how much did it cost to build the ground station? And which VTX are you using with it?

    • @mihavuk
      @mihavuk  21 день назад

      @@5c1t4l3 I'm still figuring out that extensive menu, Petru is really helpful. He provided additional explanation of HDMI out behavior of the system and where I can manually adjust it. I'll try it on the next occasion of course.
      I paid app. 130€ for VRX components in total (without antennas) and I believe I selected very good hardware. Runcam WiFi link was app. 80€.

    • @Nelo390
      @Nelo390 15 дней назад +1

      With some tweaking another guy using open ipc was able to get 120fps.

    • @mihavuk
      @mihavuk  15 дней назад

      @Nelo390 possible. I'm not familiar how OpenIPC / VFB-NG worx on the VRX. In this case, as far as I understand Ruby system, fps of the camera and latency are not directly related with HDMI output of the Ruby WRX. Ruby has implemented OpenIPC Vtx UNITS and Radxa boards few months ago and performances of those units are getting better and better with each version. You probably know that, but in case you don't, Ruby started 3-4 years ago using more or less Raspberry Pi boards on both sides, VTX and VRX.

  • @yamashe8480
    @yamashe8480 12 дней назад

    I this a ground station to receiver VTx signals?

    • @mihavuk
      @mihavuk  12 дней назад

      @@yamashe8480 yes, this receives video from vtx.