What do you think about Thunderbolt 4? Are you disappointed? Comment your thoughts below! Get our Premium Apple Product Hoodie ➡ ruclips.net/channel/UCptwuAv0XQHo1OQUSaO6NHwstore Like the wallpapers in this video? Download them here ➡ bit.ly/2WNc6Qw
Love it. I was worried that we were not going to get as much bandwidth as we initially did but now at least it’s safe to say that the future is looking bright for arm macs.🤔
Sounds good, but they could have made things clearer... I mean that's a lot of things to remember and look for. And, once again, I dislike the usb-c connector because it is not physically robust at all. One wrong move and you damage something.
4 years later, someone is still learning from video. You and your team is awesome. Thank you for this really informative and easily explained video!!!!
That is the weirdest Thunderbolt update ever.. More like Thunderbolt 3.01? USB4 is one of the best updates ever though. I thought the most important thing to update with TB was to get the speed and dual bandwidth(?) to match a PCI slot so that eGPU’s and such can live up to their full potential? It should be mandatory from now on to print an icon next to every port, and onto every cable, telling us what it is.
Not knowing what the cable will support is my only gripe with USB-C. What version of USB? What kind of power delivery? Even just something indicating that it's dedicated to one purpose. I have a cable that's displayport on one end and plugged into my monitor and USB-C on the other, but you wouldn't know it's a display port only cable unless you trace it back to its source. Or those 'special' cables Oneplus has for fast charging should have some kind of indicator on them. USB-IF needs to get on that.
in the end i guess they chose an umambiguous branding difference to ensure a certain minimal standard, not sure why they create an addtional controller chip however as they could just enforce any usb4 that meet their criteria to be certified as thunderbolt 4. tho i suppose since thunderbolt 4 will be integrated into their new cpus we have no idea if thunderbolt 4 devices will even require a chip at this point. also apple silicon supporting thunderbolt may also be an reason by they need a controller chip out there hmmm
I was really worried about if Apple would continue to use the thunderbolt specification in the future ARM based Macs, it is a relief to hear that they will be using thunderbolt 4 and continue to support thunderbolt 3.
But Apple didn't say they'd support thunderbolt 4 specifically, just that they'd support thunderbolt. They may just continue to use thunderbolt 3 in their ARM macs. They will probably support Thunderbolt 4 but it wasn't stated explicitly.
Requiring Intel’s VT-d protection for DMA is actually a massive improvement in terms of security. As it currently stands plugging a malicious Thunderbolt 3 device into your machine can read or write to your system’s RAM and do nefarious things such as retrieve sensitive information or overwrite your password with a known one so the attacker can log in as if they were you.
Thunderbolt 4 would still require the Intel chip because of VT-d. What Apple might be trying to do is work with Intel to allow Apple's T2 chip to also do what the VT-d chip does. From extremetech article: "Alternately, it’s possible that Intel and Apple will sign some kind of technology license, allowing the DMA protection Intel enforces via VT-d to be implemented on a future Apple ARM chip or specialized security processor like the T2." Without this agreement, Apple would still have to buy and install the VT-d chip, which is worthless on a Mac since Apple already has plenty of specialized security hardware and software and doesn't need anything from Intel. I don't know what external component vendors will be required to do to continue to support Thunderbolt but hopefully they won't have to continue to use Intel's overpriced hardware, thereby being able to reduce the cost on Thunderbolt peripherals.
I read that security requirement isn’t Intel specific, but rather that style of protection, such that AMD system are a possibility (and AMD has released statement to this effect)
I dont get this thing. I've never had any problem plugging it. There's a logo which should always be upwards. And if it's reversed you see a line on the connector which you dont' see when it's the right side up.
Private679 R.I.C.O both of my iPad and my phones RUclips update is about a year old so I don’t get the features. The comment section is in the old place for me and I have the old mini player on the iPad. I recently watched some videos on an updated device I realized it that time that there is a feature like this.
This is a fascinating video. It is an extremely complex area, confusing and misleading from the lack of attention paid to the consumer by the manufacturers. I am grateful to Max Tech for providing a clear, concise, understandable, well produced compelling explanation of the current mess. Many people will be mislead by what is happening, this video blows away lots of the fog. Thank you MT.
Just got the notification that my hoodie (same exact one you’re wearing in this video) is now shipping! YAY! Also just glad I have there 2020 13” MacBook Pro with 4 Thunderbolt 3 ports, they’ve been a lifesaver in my workflow!
Was going to get a laptop with a 9th gen Intel CPU with Thunderbolt 3, but after having seen how well AMD is doing and with USB 4.0 somewhere on the horizon, I have high hopes that they'll implement both.
Very nice. Did you guys end up selling the Mac Pro like you were planning to and replacing it with a MacBook Pro with a 5600m? If so, how do you like it, and is that what y'all are using to edit?
Be careful buying usb-c cables. Most sold on Amazon only support USB 2.0 speed of 480 Mbit/s. I found a 4 foot cable (USB 4 Cable for Thunderbolt 4 Cable 4 FT, VCOM 100W Cable with 40Gbps Data and 8K@30Hz 5K@60Hz or Dual 4K Video,Compatible with Thunderbolt 3/4 Cable and USB-C,for MacBooks,Hub, Docking, and More) for $20 from VCOM.
Yeah but not all thunderbolt 3 cables transfer the same speed or power. So how does one know If they are using a thunderbolt 3 or 4 cable if they have the same icon?
Actually thunderbolt was created by Intel and Apple together SO I makes sense that they can make it work with Apple silicon bcoz they have rights to the technology.
The PCIe bandwidth being doubled to 32 Gb/s seems like a pretty big jump to me. I feel like this would make both high and low end eGPU setups much more worthwhile.
I’m slowly starting to understand all these new ports. I just brought a new Mac Mini to replace my 2012 iMac and I had no idea why reviews and spec sites were calling the USB-C ports “thunderbolt 3”.
The most important 2 features of Thunderbolt 4. 1. Minimum standard for cables and support are raised, so you don't get below spec devices on a daisy chain which can hinder other devices. 2. This is the biggest one. Thunderbolt 4 requires all devices to have DMA protection so it can be locked down. DMA hack vectors keep these devices out of profitable government contracts and some businesses. As TBT is going to on ARM Macs, it makes you wonder how much involvement Intel has on this, and possibly why legal X86 emulation (at least in the demo) worked so well.
A post M1 Mac update to this would be good. We are seeing USB4 / TB4 Docks and they seem to work well, although they all seem to have a front side input which is good for laptops but bad for desktops. The M1 killed eGPU support. USB4 / TB4 cables aren’t available.
USB Type-C can support DisplayPort output without TB3. The problem (difference) comes when you want to hook up multiple displays, then USB 3.2 bandwidth might not be enough.
I literally just gave away a $2k MacBook Pro 2018 because of all thunderbolt issues and dongles. So tired of apple propriety bs and switch to Windows Surface... now everything just works! - great video!
As someone who has read extensively on the topics of USB-C, USB 3 (all versions), USB4, Thunderbolt 3 & Thunderbolt 4, I can tell you that this video does the best job I've ever seen in clarifying these concepts. Thank you very much! 3 things I'm not clear about: 1. When a laptop manufacturer chooses to implement Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbps of course), does that port have to support USB4 40 Gbps, or can the manufacturer choose to only support USB4 20 Gbps? 'Cause remember, with Thunderbolt 3 ports, the TB3 connection is at 40 Gbps, but the USB connection could either be SuperSpeed 10 Gbps or SuperSpeed 20 Gbps. That was left up to the manufacturer, so now I'm wondering whether it's the same with USB4 40 Gbps & USB4 20 Gbps. 2. I saw the compact Thunderbolt 4 dock. My question is: When Intel says the dock has four (4) Thunderbolt 4 ports, does that include the port that's connected to the laptop? In other words, will we have a total of five (5) ports - One connected to the laptop, and four (4) free ones, or will we have a total of four (4) ports - one connected to the laptop, and three (3) free ones? 3. The compact Thunderbolt 4 dock, is it only powered via the TB4 connection to the laptop, or does it require its own power supply?
1. Yes. In a nutshell, USB4 is essentially combining both USB 3 Gen 2x2 and Thunderbolt 3 into a single standard. However, in USB4, Thunderbolt 3 is optional, meaning that you could have 20-40 Gbps bandwidth depending on the laptop manufacturer's decision to use Thunderbolt 3 or not. Now, in Thunderbolt 4, all they're really doing is using USB4, but forcing the usage of Thunderbolt 3 for 40 Gbps bandwidth (bidirectional) and forcing DMA security. In Thunderbolt 4, they're achieving the higher display resolutions by allowing the data lanes to change to a single direction, enabling 80 Gbps of bandwidth for video. 2. The connection from a dock/hub to the laptop is referred to an upstream port, whereas the connection from a dock/hub to another peripheral is a downstream port. My assumption is that four Thunderbolt ports means that there are four downstream ports for peripherals and one upstream port for the laptop. 3. Most all docks I've seen are self-powered, so I'd expect this to be the same. Hubs are different as they'll draw power directly from the device and can sometimes offer the ability to provide power.
For me the main mystery comes one we talk about power adapters (power delivery). It is stated that USB-C connector can transfer up to 100w of energy. But for example Dell has AC adapters for XPS/Precision line of laptops, that provides 130w (e.g. www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-130-watt-type-c-3-prong-ac-adapter-with-32-ft-power-cord/apd/450-ahom/pc-accessories) . And it works. How could that be?
1:22 It can get pretty faulty if it gets dust in it, or if the shield snaps from the PCB because the joint was not strong enough. Granted, usb3.0 type A was pretty irritating, especially when something forced them back to 2.0 mode. Type-C smashed that problem. Do not get me wrong all 3 ports are very awesome, but someone needs to solve the strength and conduction problems before trying to shove 40gib/s through the cable. I think it could be as simple as using those old Kingston lock ports to add structural rigidity. (For docks, and maybe like a sidecar to 90 the ports over.) Never-the-less, great video, and happy to have it and share it before confusion sets in.
That's kinda disappointing. Nice streamlining and I like the longer cable a ton, but man, a doubling in speed would have been nice. Daisy chaining doesn't make sense if the main device saturates the connection, which egpus do. Also, given that this standard will be around for a few years, no mention of pcie gen 4 is a bit worrying.
Just a few factual errors I thought I'd correct: usb c is just the connector, you could also have a usb c port that's usb 2(notably some early usb c phones had this) not just the variations of 3 and 4, also usb c also supports displayport (not 100% of the time, like pc motherboards with a ryzen chip without integrated graphics won't output anything if you tried to connect display over usb c port on the motherboard) not just thunderbolt
egpus perform worse than dgpu in mb pro in some peoductivity test despite the egpu having more raw performance. And that happens due to bandwith limitaion. So 32gbps on tb4 (instead of 16gbps on tb3) should resolve the issue right?
That’s the minimum spec. I think Thunderbolt 3 already does 32Gbps but I’m not sure if it has other limitations on top of that which could be removed with Thunderbolt 4.
I am glade to see Apple support thunderbolt. It should play a lot of fears. But I really wish they would be more forthcoming about what's on these new Macs. Any system shipping this year must be almost finalized. I am going to guess they are waiting to create there promotional material before sharing a lot of these facts. But there are a lot of users that have invested in docks, eGPUs and 10gbe networking and some of us want to know if this is still a good idea.
Cause as it sits, we generically know what a desktop grade gpus looks like. But since apple is rumored to be leaving amd graphics, then whats the replacement for desktop gpus? I figure that apple has a plan for high end graphics, but the next question is whether or not it will actually look like current gpus or will it be a radically different design? Cause if thats the case, then buying an egpu now in the long run will be pointless since we have no idea if the future of apple gpus will physically be supported by current enclosures. Yeah if you buy an intel mac it’ll be supported and used for a while, the transition time and probably a few years after. But say if you own an egpu now then upgrade to an apple silicone mac, at what point does it become obsolete? Since there are no reports on this front yet, i see this as a great way for apple to brand its own enclosure and set of graphics or basically sell a redesigned afterburner card that will be a “thoughtfully designed” egpu. I can see them telling us how “you dont need to choose a card and hope it fits in your enclosure” or “never worry about set up and building, just plug it in and it works”
So if you want a good thunderbolt 3 and USB 4 cable you could get a thunderbolt 4 cable? What I am getting from the video is that thunderbolt 4 is practically a certification that a cable can support the full functionality of thunderbolt3/usb4
Usb4.0 still has that crappy naming of gen2x2 for 20gbit and gen3x2 for 40gbit. Just make it compulsory to have only 1 supported speed per standard because the average consumer will not know any better and not know what cable to get...😤
It's been a dream of mine to run my computers in one room of my house and just run cables to each room. That way I can keep one room climate controlled and not worry too much about noise and heat production. Would a fiber optic Thunderbolt 3 cable to a peripheral hub allow me to do this?
He is completely leaving outside the fact the new thunderbolt 4, requiring DMA protection means someone can't read your memory by just plugging a dongle to your computer. This is a huge security improvement on the protocol that wasn't included as a minimum specification before.
Another important thing to note regarding ThunderBolt 3 is that there is a correct way to plug them in, essentially there is an up and down side to the connector.
there is only one way to plug in T2, so duh… you clown. My point is that both ends of a thunderbolt 3 cable must be oriented the same way… with the thunderbolt up, or both with thunderbolt down. You will not obtain 100% throughput without them both being oriented the same way…
@@elmzsni CalDigit did a video explaining T3, so I asked them. They agree T3 cable orientation is irrelevant, unless there's a problem with the equipment. See latest comments on this video: ruclips.net/video/AEZ2koLHEl8/видео.html .
Ive been watching what feels like 50 video at this point trying to understand this concept a little more. This was the best overview so far on the three of the latest releases, but i can't find one that breaks down the connections between devices. Technically i can buy a bad cable for $5 and it'll charge/transfer whatever but not efficiently or at the risk of harming devices. So I what I'm trying to understand is if your device has Thunderbolt 3, does your cable need to be specifically thunderbolt 3? Does your charging block specifically need to be thunderbolt 3? Does it matter if the cable is thunderbolt 4, but your charging block is USB 2.2x2? That's the part I'm struggling to find any information on.
Having minimum specs is annoying because you'll have to be sure you're buying the right cables and stuff... usb4 should be made to support at least thunderbolt 3specs
Apple’s current M1-based laptops as well as the Mac Mini support Thunderbolt 4. I do not know if they are paying Intel any royalties for Thunderbolt 4 support, but the support is integrated on the M1 chip. This means, you may use a Thunderbolt 4 hub with any of the M1 Macs. The biggest complaint I hear about the M1 Macs is the fact that they only have two Thunderbolt ports (especially the Mac Mini). But the Intel-based Mac Mini with four Thunderbolt ports only has two Intel Thunderbolt controllers. If you use a Thunderbolt 4 hub with a Mac Mini, you wind up with four ports at the same speed as the ports on the Intel-based Mac Mini (and yes, I do understand that you have to pay more than the cost of the Mac Mini for that capability, but I find it understandable that Apple chose to not build a Thunderbolt 4 hub into the Mac Mini).
Idk why people were worried about Apple not having Thunderbolt on their ARM Macs. Intel has long made Thunderbolt royalty free. USB4 is basically TB3, so even if Apple “dropped TB” they would still use USB4 which is still the same thing.
If it’s dark or if the port is in a weird spot. For example, the back of the iMac. I don’t really want to spin the iMac around since I have slight OCD with my setup
So, the comparison of Thunderbolt 4 and Thunderbolt 3 shows a difference of two 4K displays for Thunderbolt 4 and a single 4K display for Thunderbolt 3. What they aren't telling you is that this is with 120Hz refresh rate. Thunderbolt 3 already supports two 4K displays at 60Hz.
I find it unacceptable that new specificiations come out with a "minimum" of features required for certification and a bunch of optional features, all while all the different certified products carry the same name. I'm a consumer. I just want a USB4 cable. But some of them will be 20Gbps and others will be 40Gbps. But both are USB4 somehow. Frustrating and completely ridiculous.
Apple macs will continue to support thunderbolt, but it doesn't say which generation. We know that USB 4 can 'carry' thunderbolt 3, so I'd say the new apple silicon macs will just be USB4 (which supports Thunderbolt 3). Either way, that's fine with me, so long as I don't have to change all my external peripherals that use USB 2, 3, display port, thunderbolt and firewire.
what needs to happen is the devices need to say what they are connected as... like on the screen of a device in will say 40gb or 5gb like as a floating icon over the drive or something? Or on the task bar maybe.
What do you think about Thunderbolt 4? Are you disappointed? Comment your thoughts below!
Get our Premium Apple Product Hoodie ➡ ruclips.net/channel/UCptwuAv0XQHo1OQUSaO6NHwstore
Like the wallpapers in this video? Download them here ➡ bit.ly/2WNc6Qw
Love it. I was worried that we were not going to get as much bandwidth as we initially did but now at least it’s safe to say that the future is looking bright for arm macs.🤔
How do you avoid Apple suing you for using the images? Or are they Apple device like image but not one to one?
Sounds good, but they could have made things clearer... I mean that's a lot of things to remember and look for. And, once again, I dislike the usb-c connector because it is not physically robust at all. One wrong move and you damage something.
What are the speakers on the desk at the 2:56 mark?
Screw thunderbolt 4 if there’s no speed upgrade.
4 years later, someone is still learning from video. You and your team is awesome. Thank you for this really informative and easily explained video!!!!
Thank you! We appreciate it!
That is the weirdest Thunderbolt update ever.. More like Thunderbolt 3.01? USB4 is one of the best updates ever though. I thought the most important thing to update with TB was to get the speed and dual bandwidth(?) to match a PCI slot so that eGPU’s and such can live up to their full potential?
It should be mandatory from now on to print an icon next to every port, and onto every cable, telling us what it is.
Not knowing what the cable will support is my only gripe with USB-C. What version of USB? What kind of power delivery? Even just something indicating that it's dedicated to one purpose. I have a cable that's displayport on one end and plugged into my monitor and USB-C on the other, but you wouldn't know it's a display port only cable unless you trace it back to its source. Or those 'special' cables Oneplus has for fast charging should have some kind of indicator on them. USB-IF needs to get on that.
in the end i guess they chose an umambiguous branding difference to ensure a certain minimal standard, not sure why they create an addtional controller chip however as they could just enforce any usb4 that meet their criteria to be certified as thunderbolt 4. tho i suppose since thunderbolt 4 will be integrated into their new cpus we have no idea if thunderbolt 4 devices will even require a chip at this point. also apple silicon supporting thunderbolt may also be an reason by they need a controller chip out there hmmm
Watching this video is a hundred times easier than reading Intel's press briefing!
I was really worried about if Apple would continue to use the thunderbolt specification in the future ARM based Macs, it is a relief to hear that they will be using thunderbolt 4 and continue to support thunderbolt 3.
Valid thought aswell, luckily thunderbolt is no longer propriety to intel
Intel made thunderbolt in collaboration with Apple so I didn’t have any doubts about it not being supported tbh
But Apple didn't say they'd support thunderbolt 4 specifically, just that they'd support thunderbolt. They may just continue to use thunderbolt 3 in their ARM macs. They will probably support Thunderbolt 4 but it wasn't stated explicitly.
if they don't switch to usb c they will always have a dogshit cord, usb c is better in every way
@@coaltrain2299what are you yapping about?
Requiring Intel’s VT-d protection for DMA is actually a massive improvement in terms of security. As it currently stands plugging a malicious Thunderbolt 3 device into your machine can read or write to your system’s RAM and do nefarious things such as retrieve sensitive information or overwrite your password with a known one so the attacker can log in as if they were you.
Thunderbolt 4 would still require the Intel chip because of VT-d. What Apple might be trying to do is work with Intel to allow Apple's T2 chip to also do what the VT-d chip does. From extremetech article: "Alternately, it’s possible that Intel and Apple will sign some kind of technology license, allowing the DMA protection Intel enforces via VT-d to be implemented on a future Apple ARM chip or specialized security processor like the T2." Without this agreement, Apple would still have to buy and install the VT-d chip, which is worthless on a Mac since Apple already has plenty of specialized security hardware and software and doesn't need anything from Intel. I don't know what external component vendors will be required to do to continue to support Thunderbolt but hopefully they won't have to continue to use Intel's overpriced hardware, thereby being able to reduce the cost on Thunderbolt peripherals.
I read that security requirement isn’t Intel specific, but rather that style of protection, such that AMD system are a possibility (and AMD has released statement to this effect)
حلم
الا اله الا الله الحمد الله رب العالمين
الله له ملك السموات والا رض وهو علي كل شيء قدير
Future Vadim, can you please give us the lottery numbers in advance please 😁
hahaha!
@@MaxTechOfficial So what is the number 😏
69 69 69
_noice_
Should be called TB 3.5 or something, definitely doesn’t feel like a 4
it's about matching the usb name, really, as its pretty much nothing but a certification of a *very good* usb 4 execution
how USB type A works:
try to plug it in, doesnt work
turning it around also doesnt work
turning it around again then works
I dont get this thing. I've never had any problem plugging it. There's a logo which should always be upwards. And if it's reversed you see a line on the connector which you dont' see when it's the right side up.
Micro B is even worse.
@@Inazarab You could at least feel the spikes on micro-b with your hand. I mean the underside
I actually came here to know what is this thunderbolt cable, and I got to know even more from the beginning.
great video!!!
Man this channel deserves to have millions of subscribers. He explains so perfectly.
This video has sections. I didn’t RUclips had this feature. This feature makes the understanding the part easily.
This feature came last month
Private679 R.I.C.O both of my iPad and my phones RUclips update is about a year old so I don’t get the features. The comment section is in the old place for me and I have the old mini player on the iPad. I recently watched some videos on an updated device I realized it that time that there is a feature like this.
Gabriel Jacoby-Cooper Thank You for explaining. It is really a great feature.
This is a fascinating video. It is an extremely complex area, confusing and misleading from the lack of attention paid to the consumer by the manufacturers. I am grateful to Max Tech for providing a clear, concise, understandable, well produced compelling explanation of the current mess. Many people will be mislead by what is happening, this video blows away lots of the fog. Thank you MT.
Thanks for the information, I didn't understand the difference between those TB/USB connectors :)
Just got the notification that my hoodie (same exact one you’re wearing in this video) is now shipping! YAY! Also just glad I have there 2020 13” MacBook Pro with 4 Thunderbolt 3 ports, they’ve been a lifesaver in my workflow!
Thanks for supporting us!
Was going to get a laptop with a 9th gen Intel CPU with Thunderbolt 3, but after having seen how well AMD is doing and with USB 4.0 somewhere on the horizon, I have high hopes that they'll implement both.
Very nice. Did you guys end up selling the Mac Pro like you were planning to and replacing it with a MacBook Pro with a 5600m? If so, how do you like it, and is that what y'all are using to edit?
Big confusion very nicely explained. Thanks!
Very well-researched and fine-made video this is. Well Done "Max Tech".
i was also worried about apple arm and thunderbolt relationship. thanks for clarification
Thank you for the comparison of USB 3 and 4 and Thunderbolt 3 and 4. Made it crystal-clear.
Be careful buying usb-c cables. Most sold on Amazon only support USB 2.0 speed of 480 Mbit/s. I found a 4 foot cable (USB 4 Cable for Thunderbolt 4 Cable 4 FT, VCOM 100W Cable with 40Gbps Data and 8K@30Hz 5K@60Hz or Dual 4K Video,Compatible with Thunderbolt 3/4 Cable and USB-C,for MacBooks,Hub, Docking, and More) for $20 from VCOM.
Thunderbolt 4 cable will have Thunderbolt Icon and 4 on the connector, it’s pretty easy to tell
Yeah but not all thunderbolt 3 cables transfer the same speed or power. So how does one know If they are using a thunderbolt 3 or 4 cable if they have the same icon?
you guys make the most comprehensible tech videos - thanks
Actually thunderbolt was created by Intel and Apple together SO I makes sense that they can make it work with Apple silicon bcoz they have rights to the technology.
Yeah, my company tested out a prototype in late 2010 on an Apple system when it was still known as Lightpeak.
The PCIe bandwidth being doubled to 32 Gb/s seems like a pretty big jump to me. I feel like this would make both high and low end eGPU setups much more worthwhile.
I’m slowly starting to understand all these new ports. I just brought a new Mac Mini to replace my 2012 iMac and I had no idea why reviews and spec sites were calling the USB-C ports “thunderbolt 3”.
Amazing video. It’s amazing how you guys find these amazing topics.
What an amazing comment
Amazing...
Digging deep into the specs on this one. Great info!
Overall pretty good, well balanced, well delivered presentation. God job!
The most important 2 features of Thunderbolt 4.
1. Minimum standard for cables and support are raised, so you don't get below spec devices on a daisy chain which can hinder other devices.
2. This is the biggest one. Thunderbolt 4 requires all devices to have DMA protection so it can be locked down. DMA hack vectors keep these devices out of profitable government contracts and some businesses.
As TBT is going to on ARM Macs, it makes you wonder how much involvement Intel has on this, and possibly why legal X86 emulation (at least in the demo) worked so well.
Thanks for explaining everything in detail
Very well Explained. Could not have got a better explanation Great work Keep making such great videos👍👍👍👍👍
A post M1 Mac update to this would be good. We are seeing USB4 / TB4 Docks and they seem to work well, although they all seem to have a front side input which is good for laptops but bad for desktops. The M1 killed eGPU support. USB4 / TB4 cables aren’t available.
I always explain. Type C is Interface, USB & Thunderbolt is Protocol. Both of the interface and protocol have different variations.
USB Type-C can support DisplayPort output without TB3. The problem (difference) comes when you want to hook up multiple displays, then USB 3.2 bandwidth might not be enough.
I was reading about this today. Good overview and I am excited for this new spec that'll be updated again and again. (:
OK, now I'm wondering, how the heck did Samsung and some other smartphone manufacturers put 15W or more through USB Type-A...
I literally just gave away a $2k MacBook Pro 2018 because of all thunderbolt issues and dongles. So tired of apple propriety bs and switch to Windows Surface... now everything just works! - great video!
Intel can grab more money from us again with TB4
Proprietary hardware = not for me
As someone who has read extensively on the topics of USB-C, USB 3 (all versions), USB4, Thunderbolt 3 & Thunderbolt 4, I can tell you that this video does the best job I've ever seen in clarifying these concepts. Thank you very much! 3 things I'm not clear about:
1. When a laptop manufacturer chooses to implement Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbps of course), does that port have to support USB4 40 Gbps, or can the manufacturer choose to only support USB4 20 Gbps? 'Cause remember, with Thunderbolt 3 ports, the TB3 connection is at 40 Gbps, but the USB connection could either be SuperSpeed 10 Gbps or SuperSpeed 20 Gbps. That was left up to the manufacturer, so now I'm wondering whether it's the same with USB4 40 Gbps & USB4 20 Gbps.
2. I saw the compact Thunderbolt 4 dock. My question is: When Intel says the dock has four (4) Thunderbolt 4 ports, does that include the port that's connected to the laptop? In other words, will we have a total of five (5) ports - One connected to the laptop, and four (4) free ones, or will we have a total of four (4) ports - one connected to the laptop, and three (3) free ones?
3. The compact Thunderbolt 4 dock, is it only powered via the TB4 connection to the laptop, or does it require its own power supply?
1. Yes. In a nutshell, USB4 is essentially combining both USB 3 Gen 2x2 and Thunderbolt 3 into a single standard. However, in USB4, Thunderbolt 3 is optional, meaning that you could have 20-40 Gbps bandwidth depending on the laptop manufacturer's decision to use Thunderbolt 3 or not. Now, in Thunderbolt 4, all they're really doing is using USB4, but forcing the usage of Thunderbolt 3 for 40 Gbps bandwidth (bidirectional) and forcing DMA security. In Thunderbolt 4, they're achieving the higher display resolutions by allowing the data lanes to change to a single direction, enabling 80 Gbps of bandwidth for video.
2. The connection from a dock/hub to the laptop is referred to an upstream port, whereas the connection from a dock/hub to another peripheral is a downstream port. My assumption is that four Thunderbolt ports means that there are four downstream ports for peripherals and one upstream port for the laptop.
3. Most all docks I've seen are self-powered, so I'd expect this to be the same. Hubs are different as they'll draw power directly from the device and can sometimes offer the ability to provide power.
Thanks, Max Tech guys!! gr8 nfo!
For me the main mystery comes one we talk about power adapters (power delivery). It is stated that USB-C connector can transfer up to 100w of energy. But for example Dell has AC adapters for XPS/Precision line of laptops, that provides 130w (e.g. www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-130-watt-type-c-3-prong-ac-adapter-with-32-ft-power-cord/apd/450-ahom/pc-accessories) . And it works. How could that be?
Thank you for the clarification! I didn't heard about thunderbolt 3 until lately when I was researching about the new hp spectre 360!
And as usual, it will be a while before we get a fully functioning system with the latest and greatest.
Are you the same guy from AppleInsider 3 years ago? Nice to see you have improve your speech delivery. Keep it up.
1:22 It can get pretty faulty if it gets dust in it, or if the shield snaps from the PCB because the joint was not strong enough. Granted, usb3.0 type A was pretty irritating, especially when something forced them back to 2.0 mode. Type-C smashed that problem.
Do not get me wrong all 3 ports are very awesome, but someone needs to solve the strength and conduction problems before trying to shove 40gib/s through the cable.
I think it could be as simple as using those old Kingston lock ports to add structural rigidity. (For docks, and maybe like a sidecar to 90 the ports over.)
Never-the-less, great video, and happy to have it and share it before confusion sets in.
Thank you for making this video! It makes it all clear.
You are the best utuber
Dude! Full PCie 3 bandwidth is the best feature. Now people will be able to have 100% egpu performance! I am so hyped!
Wow what a great and very informative video. Thanks!
That's kinda disappointing. Nice streamlining and I like the longer cable a ton, but man, a doubling in speed would have been nice. Daisy chaining doesn't make sense if the main device saturates the connection, which egpus do.
Also, given that this standard will be around for a few years, no mention of pcie gen 4 is a bit worrying.
All usb A have a sign that shows the direction to insert them.I know it's kind of late news.
I thought this was techquickie when I saw the thumbnail lol
Wow, I thought I was confused before watching this video, now I'm even more confused! Thaaanks
Didn't Apple develop the original Thunderbolt with Intel?
Yes but Intel bought the rights back. That's why they were able to license for Windows computers that even runs with AMD chipsets.
They developed it together but Intel owns the rights.
Just a few factual errors I thought I'd correct: usb c is just the connector, you could also have a usb c port that's usb 2(notably some early usb c phones had this) not just the variations of 3 and 4, also usb c also supports displayport (not 100% of the time, like pc motherboards with a ryzen chip without integrated graphics won't output anything if you tried to connect display over usb c port on the motherboard) not just thunderbolt
Asymmetric USB-C will be interesting especially if it can flip directions itself
Great channel. You are my go to source to keep up with Apple.
The end of this video nearly gave me a heart attack haha my entire set up is Thunderbolt 3
My heart seized when I heard that, I was like nooooooo and the next sec I’m relieved.
So much powerful information
Thanks! Made everything simple!
... 😁... excellent presentation.... !!!... also an excellent example of how fast everything is evolving... i loved my Ataris...😅.....!!!!!....
can you make a video on the Apple $130 T3 cable and why it's so much more costly than Belkin?
egpus perform worse than dgpu in mb pro in some peoductivity test despite the egpu having more raw performance. And that happens due to bandwith limitaion. So 32gbps on tb4 (instead of 16gbps on tb3) should resolve the issue right?
That’s the minimum spec. I think Thunderbolt 3 already does 32Gbps but I’m not sure if it has other limitations on top of that which could be removed with Thunderbolt 4.
@@MaxTechOfficial Then we have to just wait and watch.
I am glade to see Apple support thunderbolt. It should play a lot of fears. But I really wish they would be more forthcoming about what's on these new Macs. Any system shipping this year must be almost finalized. I am going to guess they are waiting to create there promotional material before sharing a lot of these facts. But there are a lot of users that have invested in docks, eGPUs and 10gbe networking and some of us want to know if this is still a good idea.
A wonderful informative video. Thank you!
So a future with thunderbolt still exists, cool. But the real question i have now is whats the future of egpus?
Cause as it sits, we generically know what a desktop grade gpus looks like. But since apple is rumored to be leaving amd graphics, then whats the replacement for desktop gpus?
I figure that apple has a plan for high end graphics, but the next question is whether or not it will actually look like current gpus or will it be a radically different design? Cause if thats the case, then buying an egpu now in the long run will be pointless since we have no idea if the future of apple gpus will physically be supported by current enclosures.
Yeah if you buy an intel mac it’ll be supported and used for a while, the transition time and probably a few years after. But say if you own an egpu now then upgrade to an apple silicone mac, at what point does it become obsolete?
Since there are no reports on this front yet, i see this as a great way for apple to brand its own enclosure and set of graphics or basically sell a redesigned afterburner card that will be a “thoughtfully designed” egpu. I can see them telling us how “you dont need to choose a card and hope it fits in your enclosure” or “never worry about set up and building, just plug it in and it works”
USB: You don't know what you get
Thunderbolt: You pay to know what you get
So if you want a good thunderbolt 3 and USB 4 cable you could get a thunderbolt 4 cable? What I am getting from the video is that thunderbolt 4 is practically a certification that a cable can support the full functionality of thunderbolt3/usb4
Usb4.0 still has that crappy naming of gen2x2 for 20gbit and gen3x2 for 40gbit. Just make it compulsory to have only 1 supported speed per standard because the average consumer will not know any better and not know what cable to get...😤
It's been a dream of mine to run my computers in one room of my house and just run cables to each room. That way I can keep one room climate controlled and not worry too much about noise and heat production. Would a fiber optic Thunderbolt 3 cable to a peripheral hub allow me to do this?
On the 2019 MacBook Pro Apple calls is USB C 3.1 with 10GB transfer speed. The power rating is only 96W
He is completely leaving outside the fact the new thunderbolt 4, requiring DMA protection means someone can't read your memory by just plugging a dongle to your computer. This is a huge security improvement on the protocol that wasn't included as a minimum specification before.
Really interesting video, I was wondering the same question
I kinda liked the usb a tho lol
Another important thing to note regarding ThunderBolt 3 is that there is a correct way to plug them in, essentially there is an up and down side to the connector.
That is true for Thunderbolt 2, but not Thunderbolt 3. T3 uses the USB-C connector.
there is only one way to plug in T2, so duh… you clown. My point is that both ends of a thunderbolt 3 cable must be oriented the same way… with the thunderbolt up, or both with thunderbolt down. You will not obtain 100% throughput without them both being oriented the same way…
@@elmzsni If you're having to orient your cables the same way, the issue not to do with T3.
@@adiands850 yeah, Akito node TB3 eGPU doesn't like it unless oriented same way on both sides... cable is < or = .5m for 40gbps; so who knows...
@@elmzsni CalDigit did a video explaining T3, so I asked them. They agree T3 cable orientation is irrelevant, unless there's a problem with the equipment. See latest comments on this video: ruclips.net/video/AEZ2koLHEl8/видео.html .
actually happened in ipad Pro 2021 got thunderbolt usb4 great analysis
Disappointed that TB4 is still 40Gb/s. I was hoping the new one would improve egpu performance
Ive been watching what feels like 50 video at this point trying to understand this concept a little more. This was the best overview so far on the three of the latest releases, but i can't find one that breaks down the connections between devices. Technically i can buy a bad cable for $5 and it'll charge/transfer whatever but not efficiently or at the risk of harming devices. So I what I'm trying to understand is if your device has Thunderbolt 3, does your cable need to be specifically thunderbolt 3? Does your charging block specifically need to be thunderbolt 3? Does it matter if the cable is thunderbolt 4, but your charging block is USB 2.2x2? That's the part I'm struggling to find any information on.
Same. its annoying
Really really appreciated this video but suggest that it needs a succinct summary as I came away more confused than ever
This completely went over my non-techy head. I'm about to purchase the M1 MacBook Air. Which hub/doc is recommended?
Thank you for another interesting and fun video. : )
Looks like we're heading into a future where all cables look the same, but on some 5Gb/s while others do 40 Gb/s. That's gonna cause some irritation.
Having minimum specs is annoying because you'll have to be sure you're buying the right cables and stuff... usb4 should be made to support at least thunderbolt 3specs
Excited for this supported more in the near future! 🤩
Apple’s current M1-based laptops as well as the Mac Mini support Thunderbolt 4. I do not know if they are paying Intel any royalties for Thunderbolt 4 support, but the support is integrated on the M1 chip. This means, you may use a Thunderbolt 4 hub with any of the M1 Macs.
The biggest complaint I hear about the M1 Macs is the fact that they only have two Thunderbolt ports (especially the Mac Mini). But the Intel-based Mac Mini with four Thunderbolt ports only has two Intel Thunderbolt controllers. If you use a Thunderbolt 4 hub with a Mac Mini, you wind up with four ports at the same speed as the ports on the Intel-based Mac Mini (and yes, I do understand that you have to pay more than the cost of the Mac Mini for that capability, but I find it understandable that Apple chose to not build a Thunderbolt 4 hub into the Mac Mini).
Why don’t all vendors agree on a spec instead of making it so confusing to the consumers?
Why does Thunderbolt 4 refuse to double its bandwidth even though PCIE4.0 has doubled its bandwidth? PCIe4.0*4 has a bandwidth of 80Gbits/s
A muchhhh needed video!! Cables be so confusing.. Thanks for this!
Well still usb 4 not available ln most laptops
But It was avaliable in iPad Pros and MacBooks
Idk why people were worried about Apple not having Thunderbolt on their ARM Macs. Intel has long made Thunderbolt royalty free. USB4 is basically TB3, so even if Apple “dropped TB” they would still use USB4 which is still the same thing.
1:10 Surprisingly, I never have this problem, since I look at the connector before plugging it in (personally I can't see why you wouldn't xD)
If it’s dark or if the port is in a weird spot. For example, the back of the iMac. I don’t really want to spin the iMac around since I have slight OCD with my setup
Same, I don't find it difficut at all
So, the comparison of Thunderbolt 4 and Thunderbolt 3 shows a difference of two 4K displays for Thunderbolt 4 and a single 4K display for Thunderbolt 3.
What they aren't telling you is that this is with 120Hz refresh rate. Thunderbolt 3 already supports two 4K displays at 60Hz.
I find it unacceptable that new specificiations come out with a "minimum" of features required for certification and a bunch of optional features, all while all the different certified products carry the same name. I'm a consumer. I just want a USB4 cable. But some of them will be 20Gbps and others will be 40Gbps. But both are USB4 somehow. Frustrating and completely ridiculous.
I love your vids, man
Thank you!
Thank u very much for making it easy to understand
Apple macs will continue to support thunderbolt, but it doesn't say which generation. We know that USB 4 can 'carry' thunderbolt 3, so I'd say the new apple silicon macs will just be USB4 (which supports Thunderbolt 3). Either way, that's fine with me, so long as I don't have to change all my external peripherals that use USB 2, 3, display port, thunderbolt and firewire.
TB4 supports up to 4 ports with one controller chip, which will likely be cheaper for Apple since they currently need two for their 16” Mbp.
what needs to happen is the devices need to say what they are connected as... like on the screen of a device in will say 40gb or 5gb like as a floating icon over the drive or something? Or on the task bar maybe.
So will all USB 4 ports support 40 Gbps, or will some be limited to 10 Gbps because the manufacturer is to cheap to upgrade them to 40 Gbps?