Propagation of Error

[@bfopaul]

thanks so much. had to search far and wide to find one that made sense. practical and concise.

[@nareshbambhroliya6985]

Thank you sir.
Excuse me sir , this numerical belongs to which grade/class , which book ?
From which country you are?
Please reply early, THANK YOU.

[@JasonRichardTesch]

so what is the case when you don't add the error

[@j44dge]

Re-make the video with Auto-focus turned off on the camera!

[@muwongeevanspaul9166]

Thanks so so so much. You have the best explanation I met right away from start to conclusion. Thanks really so much. Be more fruitful in life. Thanks for the video. 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@jehadyamin6002]

I think you forgot to divide by 2

[@chucksaurus2602]

"Video Problems" lol

[@engraedrazzaq7067]

As possible to solve( cosA=b'2+c'2-a'2 /2bc ) by method propagation of error

[@TheDarkhawk243]

this is wrong. you didnt even take into account the minimum value of V.

[@nisha2536]

How would you take it into account

[@anwarsadath9177]

love this thing

[@kiip7579]

L = (3.1±0.1) cm has only 2 sig figs. but V = (11.4±0.6) cm³ has 3 sig figs. Their sig figs are unmatched! The correct answer should be V = (11±1) cm³.

[@vortex_7574]

Your whole statement is wrong.. In your first measurement, (3.1 +_ 0.1), the minimum sig fig is 1 (0.1 - leading zeroes are ignored) and finally, when writing in proper form, you match the number of decimal places, not sig figs. Sig figs only matter when you are multiplying/dividing measurements. When adding/subtracting measurements, decimal place matters even if the number of sig fig is unmatched.

[@inamaziz8428]

Kashmirnew

[@ItsJoshNorman]

The only error here is leaving on the auto-focus.
(too cringy, didn't watch)

[@joesit]

wtf

[@lanolinetoring6097]

This is wrong

[@Hamood113]

How

[@TerrorSab]

@@Hamood113 the fact that it is + OR -, indicates that it could be either, this method assumes they are all positive

[@ysfhrb1289]

this is wrong