11:44 No. We are far beyond "recovering" from the casualties of WW2. When the war began in 1939 the world's population was about 2 billion people. Now, in 2024, we are at 8.1 billion people, and that number increases rapidly. The population of India alone has increased by about 400 million people in the last 30 years.
Most people who know about history don't believe that nonsense. If they do they are ignorant about history in general. When I watch video's of foreigners on WW 2. They say their historical account is taught primarily from their involvement. They don't get into details about the U.S. My point is, people often make comments like yours, as a criticism of American history being "pro American". IF that's the motive behind your comment, I say every country tells it mostly from their perspective and involvement. That's not unique to the U.S. How much dose Japan teach on China. How the Russia talks about on other nations. Could Russian and Great Britain won with no American individually could either won it alone. It's much easier to mobilze a force from your homeland than mobilizing and transporting a major force over two oceans. It meant mobilizing more than a sizable Army, or Army and Air Force but mobilizing a sizable Army, Air Force and Navy along with supplying your allies.
My only problem with this video is that they don't count the lives lost in Finland after the Soviets invaded. Finland hade to ally with Germany because Britain and the US was allied with the Soviets at that point.
@@Vegeta900XСоветское вторжение началось из-за того, что Финляндия захотела заключить военный союз с Германией. Аналогичная история происходит в настоящее время на Украине. Похожая история однажды чуть не привела к третьей мировой из-за Америки и Карибского кризиса. В прочем для альтернативно одаренных если кто-то вступает в военный альянс у границ Америки - это плохо. Но стоит сделать то же самое на границах России и если она дает отпор- это русская агрессия и уничтожение демократии.
Without the USA, this war would probably have been lost. Many people forget how many people lost their lives in the East (Poland, Russia, etc.). Even more forget that without the Lend Lease they would never have been able to resist. I say that as a German.
@@UKLogic22 Lol Absolutely not. America played a relatively small part in the Western Front. The only location where our presence mattered was in the Pacific theatre, against the Japanese.
To this day in Eastern Europe, the combination of ww2 and the Soviet Union means that most nations still have not recovered their pre-war population. The rest of the world saw a “post-war boom” in population growth. That same area has also seen some of the slowest wealth growth (excluding countries hindered by civil war) and more interstate wars than is seen as normal today. The Yugoslav wars, the Russian-Georgian war, Chechnya (twice), Afghanistan, Armenia and Azerbaijan. There seems to be a direct correlation between the lack of growth (and indirectly, the loss of hope) and willingness to fight for more. Which makes sense. When hopeless, people are more willing to steal. Especially when lead by people that remind them that they could have more (cough cough, Puta Putin)
great video as always bro,if theres a video i can recommend you about how these civilian death tolls were so huge would be the air campaigns,sabaton has a good history video on it called ''firestorm'' cheers!
Russia by most estimates have lost 700,000 soldiers 1000 per day on average in 2024 according to both the UK ministry of defence and the US government. Ukraine around half that. pretty devastating
@SirZanZa n it is not just a criminal murder of ukrainians by russians. russia sends thousands of indigenous people to the front in huge numbers. as an indigenous siberian, i’m horrified. my people go there and kill ukrainians even though we’re thousands of kms apart. the statistical proportion of ethnic russians to indigenous people in casualties is so unfair, especially considering how our languages and cultures are already threatened and suffering in many ways. i have no idea how ukraine and russia will look in a few years, let alone how and if we are going to recover later. ://
The numbers of the upcoming conflict will exceed those of the last two conflicts combined. Predicted by Alois Irlmaier. Be cautious…😔 PS: Mic sounds good to me.
"Big country, Big country" - that was his comment when looking at the number of dead Soviets and Stalingrad.. I find that thinking distasteful. When people make that claim for the Soviet Union. It sounds like they were just easily throwing people into their deaths like they had men to spare. Firstly, if you remotely know where Stalingrad is, and the Russian demographics, you'd know that 2/3of the Soviets were already occupied, as most people live in the West. That means that Italy and Germany had more people , hence, more men available for recruitment. That myth is idiotic in this day and age
They were throwing men to their deaths, it is the ONLY advantage Soviet Russia had. 1 pair of boots for every 3 soldiers 1 rifle for ever 2 soldiers 10 bullets for every rifle. they had to throw every man at the problem. they didn't call the eastern front the meat grinder for nothing Russian soldiers would run behind their comrades and wait for them to be killed so they could take their rifles and continue the fight, the Germans absolutely massacred the Soviets due to better training better equipment and heavy armour. the only thing Soviet Russia had was men to spare... the massive population for better or worse was the single deciding factor in soviet success. they paid for freedom (i use that term loosely ) in crimson and they paid far more than anyone else
Crazy when you think about it. 70 million at that time, like what. The world population was only 2 billion at the time. If those 70 mil people would have went on to average 2-3 kids per family, would mean around +1 billion people today (half of the entire world population back then), crazy..
The world population has recovered and grown, but the Jewish population hasn’t. It was ~16.5 million in 1939 and is ~16.1 million today. There are a few reasons for this. Over 37% of all Jews in the world died in the Holocaust. Thousands continued to be killed after the war due to pogroms against Holocaust survivors in Eastern Europe and massacres across the Middle East. There aren’t many Jewish converts because Jews don’t proselytize and converting is very difficult. Ashkenazim are more prone to heart disease and Lynch Syndromes which causes higher rates of certain cancers than the general population. Finally, as countries become more socially liberal and emancipated, people in general have fewer children and later in life.
We were a British colony during ww2, we didn’t get our independence until after. India was also part of the war but they also fall under British military. The creator even clarifies that the British army includes all of her colonies.
You sound pretty Finnish or maybe Norwegian for an "American" as you claim in the title. You may be living in the USA right now, but that does not change your perspective on the world. I would call that false advertising. But hey, what do I know, right? Maybe you were born and raised in America and I'm completely wrong.
You are incorrect if Germany didn't invade Russia they probably wouldn't have won the war. There were actual reasons that they invaded Russia, I would recommend you actually learn about World War II in detail because it is actually very important when understanding why things happened the way that they did and for what reason.
14 mio is way more realistic.btw,the US delivered 400000trucks and jeeps,thousands of tanks and airplanes, communication systems, other supplies,clothes,boots,food to the sovijetunion. According to US Ministry of defense. Without this...
Yes land lease were good for USSR army. But it came only in the late 1942. At that moment Red army were on the offense and already reverted the power on the ground to there side. Nevertheless US aid was important
А потом забрали обратно после войны . И на глазах у русских уничтожали всю технику , а России они были так нужны . И за этот ленглиз россия платила золотом , последние деньги отдали толька 2010году. А народ России голодал но отдавал золото вам помните это . Гитлер после России пошел на вас к тому времени уних появилось бомба , благодаря России это война кончилась .
1 MAJOR thing that I noticed on this video, is at the end when he compared WWII deaths to what he said was 20 or so of the WORST wars or ATTROCITIES on record, and you were looking for the total deaths of Americans during the Civil WAR, and since the smallest one on that chart was the Chinese Civil war were 3,000,000 fell, now the American Civil war granted was almost 100 years earlier than the Chinese Civil war, but the American Civil war did cost the lives of more than 620,000 Americans, BUT if you look closer at that chart near the 15:50ish mark, I think it is 8th from the left, you will find the American Indians where the Democrats ended up slaughtering more than 20,000,000 American Indians during the Indian wars, and in fact if you learn about both American History and World history, and you compare what the Democrats did to the American Indians with what Hitler did with the Jews, you will likely come to the conclusion that Adolph Hitler, got his idea on how to #1. BLAME the Jews on what happened to Germany after WWI. #2. VILIFY the Jews for what happened to Germany after WWI, #3. PERSECUTE the Jews for what was done to Germany after WWI. #4. CONFISCATE the property of the Jews in punishment for what the ALLIES did to Germany after WWI. #5. RELOCATE the Jews to somewhere else away from German society to someplace they did not want to be, and of course #6. MURDER the Jews as people that they deemed not worthy of living, all of these things were done FIRST right here in the United States of America when the Democratic party did it to the Native American Indians Tribes and Nations to a larger scale, NOW, when I say to a larger scale, here is what I mean, during WWII, Adolph Hitler DID NOT have access to all of the Jewish People on the PLANET which numbered about 21,000,000 total at the time Jewish People on the planet, but he did have access to as we already know more than 40% of the Jewish People on the planet, after he conquered nearly all of Europe, and a huge portion of Russia, and he ended up murdering about 30% ish of all Jewish people on the planet, and contrast that with what the Democrats did to the American Indians, where they DID HAVE access to 100% of them and it is IMPOSSIBLE to get ACCURATE numbers, BUT it is ESTIMATED that PRIOR to Europeans landing on the North American Continent, total populations of all Native American tribes and nations numbered about 100,000,000, and yes a huge chunk of the Native American population was through no intention of malice were killed off by diseases that were brought here by the settlers and the Indians had no immune system for fighting off, was it a tragedy? YES of course it was, BUT it was also NOT INTENDED or planned in any way, but from 1492 to the early 1800's, the Indian Nations and Tribes lived side by side pretty much in peace as neighbors, during the time of the British Colonies, and after the establishment of the United States of America in 1789, yes of course there were limited conflicts, between the British and the Native Americans, or the French and the Native Americans, or the Spanish and the Native Americans, but for the most part, after the Revolutionary war, AMERICANS and Native Americans got along pretty good, BUT in 1830, Democrat President Andrew Jackson, along with a Democrat controlled U.S. Senate and Congress, (OVER THE OBJECTIONS OF THE WHIG PARTY) decided to "REMOVE" the American Indians from their Ancestral lands, and then had the Trail of Tears, where they forcibly marched the 100,000 or so Indians from the Seminole Nation in Florida to a Reservation that they set aside for them in Oklahoma, where more then 60,000 either died on the trail, or were just murdered when they could not keep up, and this continued on and off from 1830 to 1860 with 1 tribe or nation after the next till they had them all pushed or murdered all the way to the Rocky Mountains, but the ESTIMATED total American Indian population in 1830 was 25,000,000, and in the span of 30 years of "Indian Removal" the Democrats murdered more than 20,000,000 of them, or about 94% in their Indian Wars. so if you really look at it the DEMOCRATS HERE in the U.S. is at least PARTLY responsible for the actual occurrence of WWII, and the atrocities that were committed in WWII. Because IF they had not done what they did to the Native American Indians HERE, it is likely that Adolph Hitler would not have thought about doing to the Jewish people what he did to them in WWII. BUT what the Democrats did to the Native American Indians has now been SILENTLY eclipsed, once again by the Democrats, for the past 52 years or so, the Democrats have been waging a silent GENOCIDE on BLACK people in this country, killing off so far about 48,000,000 and counting, in 1972 the total Black population in the U.S. was about 22,500,000 or about 11%, in 1990 those went to almost 30,000,000 or about 12.1%, in 2010 the numbers increased to almost 40,000,000 but the percentage only increased to 12.6% but in 2020, is what should pother people about the Democrats war on Black people, the total number in 2020 was 46,900,000 or 12.4%, and right now in 2024, the total number is 47,500,000 or 12.2%, because in 2016, after targeting Black neighborhoods and Black people, the Democrats BEGAN making progress with their plans to EXTERMINATE BLACK people from our country, when Baltimore, became the 1st city in the U.S. to record more black babies aborted than born alive, in 2017, the cities of Detroit, Philadelphia and Boston, joined that list, in 2018, St, Louis, New York City and San Francisco joined that list, and in 2019, Chicago, Kansas City, Pittsburg, Atlanta, Washington D.C. Albany, Milwaukee, Richmond, Los Angeles, Stockton Sacramento, and Albuquerque all joined that list, as the Black population has no likely reached it's peak, and began DECLINING, I truly hope that this DOES NOT CONTINUE.
12:17 I don't know why he added Gulag to the civilian losses in the war? It was a labor camp that existed before World War II. Criminals were kept there.
In those times, teachers, musicians, scientists, or anyone could find themselves in those gulags in no time. It was enough just to say "Stalin is wrong". And your family would never see you again... off to Siberia. In best case... worst case was that your family "joined you".
@@ozimakistvan Of course, many were there for political reasons, but the camp was built for criminals. I don't understand why Neil Halloran listed the prisoners as WWII casualties, maybe to show how cruel and ruthless the Soviets are.
@@ozimakistvan People didn't get there by mistake, everyone was there for a reason. You are probably justifying every maniac and rapist who is currently in prison, right?
Checkout this video American reacts To Wonders of Germany | The Most Amazing Places in Germany
ruclips.net/video/8fHbqXd_wiw/видео.html
11:44 No. We are far beyond "recovering" from the casualties of WW2. When the war began in 1939 the world's population was about 2 billion people.
Now, in 2024, we are at 8.1 billion people, and that number increases rapidly. The population of India alone has increased by about 400 million people in the last 30 years.
I want your microphone. Can you tell me what model it is?
a very important video to see for every american that still think they have fought and won ww2 nearly alone
Most people who know about history don't believe that nonsense. If they do they are ignorant about history in general. When I watch video's of foreigners on WW 2. They say their historical account is taught primarily from their involvement. They don't get into details about the U.S. My point is, people often make comments like yours, as a criticism of American history being "pro American".
IF that's the motive behind your comment, I say every country tells it mostly from their perspective and involvement. That's not unique to the U.S.
How much dose Japan teach on China. How the Russia talks about on other nations.
Could Russian and Great Britain won with no American individually could either won it alone.
It's much easier to mobilze a force from your homeland than mobilizing and transporting a major force over two oceans. It meant mobilizing more than a sizable Army, or Army and Air Force but mobilizing a sizable Army, Air Force and Navy along with supplying your allies.
My only problem with this video is that they don't count the lives lost in Finland after the Soviets invaded. Finland hade to ally with Germany because Britain and the US was allied with the Soviets at that point.
@@Vegeta900XСоветское вторжение началось из-за того, что Финляндия захотела заключить военный союз с Германией. Аналогичная история происходит в настоящее время на Украине. Похожая история однажды чуть не привела к третьей мировой из-за Америки и Карибского кризиса. В прочем для альтернативно одаренных если кто-то вступает в военный альянс у границ Америки - это плохо. Но стоит сделать то же самое на границах России и если она дает отпор- это русская агрессия и уничтожение демократии.
Without the USA, this war would probably have been lost. Many people forget how many people lost their lives in the East (Poland, Russia, etc.). Even more forget that without the Lend Lease they would never have been able to resist. I say that as a German.
@@UKLogic22 Lol Absolutely not. America played a relatively small part in the Western Front. The only location where our presence mattered was in the Pacific theatre, against the Japanese.
World population was 2,3 billion in 1945
Now it 8,1 billion as of July 2024
so that 3,5 time as much
To this day in Eastern Europe, the combination of ww2 and the Soviet Union means that most nations still have not recovered their pre-war population. The rest of the world saw a “post-war boom” in population growth. That same area has also seen some of the slowest wealth growth (excluding countries hindered by civil war) and more interstate wars than is seen as normal today. The Yugoslav wars, the Russian-Georgian war, Chechnya (twice), Afghanistan, Armenia and Azerbaijan. There seems to be a direct correlation between the lack of growth (and indirectly, the loss of hope) and willingness to fight for more. Which makes sense. When hopeless, people are more willing to steal. Especially when lead by people that remind them that they could have more (cough cough, Puta Putin)
great video as always bro,if theres a video i can recommend you about how these civilian death tolls were so huge would be the air campaigns,sabaton has a good history video on it called ''firestorm'' cheers!
The world population has quadrupled since then. We definitely don't need more people 😅
dont worry, there is nothing we can do at this point to stop demography fall by end of this century. people already almost stopped making babies
Yeah, the ukranian-Russian conflict is around 500k around now. Really sad.
Russia by most estimates have lost 700,000 soldiers 1000 per day on average in 2024 according to both the UK ministry of defence and the US government. Ukraine around half that. pretty devastating
@SirZanZa n it is not just a criminal murder of ukrainians by russians. russia sends thousands of indigenous people to the front in huge numbers. as an indigenous siberian, i’m horrified. my people go there and kill ukrainians even though we’re thousands of kms apart. the statistical proportion of ethnic russians to indigenous people in casualties is so unfair, especially considering how our languages and cultures are already threatened and suffering in many ways. i have no idea how ukraine and russia will look in a few years, let alone how and if we are going to recover later. ://
Yes, a great impressive video
ur russian love is shining through A LOT
The numbers of the upcoming conflict will exceed those of the last two conflicts combined. Predicted by Alois Irlmaier. Be cautious…😔
PS: Mic sounds good to me.
I'm glad that i live in the Saurüssel. Alois really predicted so much wich came true... but the signs aren't right for this year
I mean more people in the world pretty much means more casualties
"Big country, Big country" - that was his comment when looking at the number of dead Soviets and Stalingrad..
I find that thinking distasteful. When people make that claim for the Soviet Union. It sounds like they were just easily throwing people into their deaths like they had men to spare.
Firstly, if you remotely know where Stalingrad is, and the Russian demographics, you'd know that 2/3of the Soviets were already occupied, as most people live in the West. That means that Italy and Germany had more people , hence, more men available for recruitment. That myth is idiotic in this day and age
They were throwing men to their deaths, it is the ONLY advantage Soviet Russia had. 1 pair of boots for every 3 soldiers 1 rifle for ever 2 soldiers 10 bullets for every rifle. they had to throw every man at the problem. they didn't call the eastern front the meat grinder for nothing Russian soldiers would run behind their comrades and wait for them to be killed so they could take their rifles and continue the fight, the Germans absolutely massacred the Soviets due to better training better equipment and heavy armour. the only thing Soviet Russia had was men to spare... the massive population for better or worse was the single deciding factor in soviet success. they paid for freedom (i use that term loosely ) in crimson and they paid far more than anyone else
Crazy when you think about it. 70 million at that time, like what. The world population was only 2 billion at the time. If those 70 mil people would have went on to average 2-3 kids per family, would mean around +1 billion people today (half of the entire world population back then), crazy..
Facts are not getting monetized on YT? Grasp that.
agree!
The world population has recovered and grown, but the Jewish population hasn’t. It was ~16.5 million in 1939 and is ~16.1 million today. There are a few reasons for this. Over 37% of all Jews in the world died in the Holocaust. Thousands continued to be killed after the war due to pogroms against Holocaust survivors in Eastern Europe and massacres across the Middle East. There aren’t many Jewish converts because Jews don’t proselytize and converting is very difficult. Ashkenazim are more prone to heart disease and Lynch Syndromes which causes higher rates of certain cancers than the general population. Finally, as countries become more socially liberal and emancipated, people in general have fewer children and later in life.
Every day in the Ukraine-Russian conflict is the D-day casualties-wise
Strange the Canadian 🇨🇦 isn't mentioned, they where also in Normandy
it includ in UK numbers
We were a British colony during ww2, we didn’t get our independence until after. India was also part of the war but they also fall under British military. The creator even clarifies that the British army includes all of her colonies.
I'd suggest watching a video called "WW2 With Army Sizes" by Christopher if you enjoyed this video. Its really good.
You sound pretty Finnish or maybe Norwegian for an "American" as you claim in the title. You may be living in the USA right now, but that does not change your perspective on the world.
I would call that false advertising. But hey, what do I know, right? Maybe you were born and raised in America and I'm completely wrong.
I'm from puerto rico, born and raised...
@Pjalphareacting lol my bad bro 😂 I missed completely
history is always written by the victors, since the very first war. thats why always the good side is winning. 😉
You are incorrect if Germany didn't invade Russia they probably wouldn't have won the war.
There were actual reasons that they invaded Russia, I would recommend you actually learn about World War II in detail because it is actually very important when understanding why things happened the way that they did and for what reason.
3:35 well numbers are over 550 on russians side alone.. so.. no.
2:40 No, don't compare World War II to a military operation.
Ja 🇩🇪 sorry deutsch 😢😢😢 wir haben das gemacht 🇮🇱😥
Ich bin in Dachau . Die Gas Kammer . Das ist un Menschen
14 mio is way more realistic.btw,the US delivered 400000trucks and jeeps,thousands of tanks and airplanes, communication systems, other supplies,clothes,boots,food to the sovijetunion. According to US Ministry of defense. Without this...
us support only 10%ussr used it ww2，US support uk is 3time than that
Eventually lol, pussies for the first year
No, the agreed figure by military archives is that the Soviets lost a total of 27 million (8.5 million military and 19 million civilians).
Yes land lease were good for USSR army. But it came only in the late 1942. At that moment Red army were on the offense and already reverted the power on the ground to there side. Nevertheless US aid was important
А потом забрали обратно после войны . И на глазах у русских уничтожали всю технику , а России они были так нужны . И за этот ленглиз россия платила золотом , последние деньги отдали толька 2010году. А народ России голодал но отдавал золото вам помните это . Гитлер после России пошел на вас к тому времени уних появилось бомба , благодаря России это война кончилась .
"an like the soviest",autor of the video forget to say,that americans have tactics of meat waves,that they always tell, that soviet union did this
1 MAJOR thing that I noticed on this video, is at the end when he compared WWII deaths to what he said was 20 or so of the WORST wars or ATTROCITIES on record, and you were looking for the total deaths of Americans during the Civil WAR, and since the smallest one on that chart was the Chinese Civil war were 3,000,000 fell, now the American Civil war granted was almost 100 years earlier than the Chinese Civil war, but the American Civil war did cost the lives of more than 620,000 Americans, BUT if you look closer at that chart near the 15:50ish mark, I think it is 8th from the left, you will find the American Indians where the Democrats ended up slaughtering more than 20,000,000 American Indians during the Indian wars, and in fact if you learn about both American History and World history, and you compare what the Democrats did to the American Indians with what Hitler did with the Jews, you will likely come to the conclusion that Adolph Hitler, got his idea on how to #1. BLAME the Jews on what happened to Germany after WWI. #2. VILIFY the Jews for what happened to Germany after WWI, #3. PERSECUTE the Jews for what was done to Germany after WWI. #4. CONFISCATE the property of the Jews in punishment for what the ALLIES did to Germany after WWI. #5. RELOCATE the Jews to somewhere else away from German society to someplace they did not want to be, and of course #6. MURDER the Jews as people that they deemed not worthy of living, all of these things were done FIRST right here in the United States of America when the Democratic party did it to the Native American Indians Tribes and Nations to a larger scale, NOW, when I say to a larger scale, here is what I mean, during WWII, Adolph Hitler DID NOT have access to all of the Jewish People on the PLANET which numbered about 21,000,000 total at the time Jewish People on the planet, but he did have access to as we already know more than 40% of the Jewish People on the planet, after he conquered nearly all of Europe, and a huge portion of Russia, and he ended up murdering about 30% ish of all Jewish people on the planet, and contrast that with what the Democrats did to the American Indians, where they DID HAVE access to 100% of them and it is IMPOSSIBLE to get ACCURATE numbers, BUT it is ESTIMATED that PRIOR to Europeans landing on the North American Continent, total populations of all Native American tribes and nations numbered about 100,000,000, and yes a huge chunk of the Native American population was through no intention of malice were killed off by diseases that were brought here by the settlers and the Indians had no immune system for fighting off, was it a tragedy? YES of course it was, BUT it was also NOT INTENDED or planned in any way, but from 1492 to the early 1800's, the Indian Nations and Tribes lived side by side pretty much in peace as neighbors, during the time of the British Colonies, and after the establishment of the United States of America in 1789, yes of course there were limited conflicts, between the British and the Native Americans, or the French and the Native Americans, or the Spanish and the Native Americans, but for the most part, after the Revolutionary war, AMERICANS and Native Americans got along pretty good, BUT in 1830, Democrat President Andrew Jackson, along with a Democrat controlled U.S. Senate and Congress, (OVER THE OBJECTIONS OF THE WHIG PARTY) decided to "REMOVE" the American Indians from their Ancestral lands, and then had the Trail of Tears, where they forcibly marched the 100,000 or so Indians from the Seminole Nation in Florida to a Reservation that they set aside for them in Oklahoma, where more then 60,000 either died on the trail, or were just murdered when they could not keep up, and this continued on and off from 1830 to 1860 with 1 tribe or nation after the next till they had them all pushed or murdered all the way to the Rocky Mountains, but the ESTIMATED total American Indian population in 1830 was 25,000,000, and in the span of 30 years of "Indian Removal" the Democrats murdered more than 20,000,000 of them, or about 94% in their Indian Wars. so if you really look at it the DEMOCRATS HERE in the U.S. is at least PARTLY responsible for the actual occurrence of WWII, and the atrocities that were committed in WWII. Because IF they had not done what they did to the Native American Indians HERE, it is likely that Adolph Hitler would not have thought about doing to the Jewish people what he did to them in WWII. BUT what the Democrats did to the Native American Indians has now been SILENTLY eclipsed, once again by the Democrats, for the past 52 years or so, the Democrats have been waging a silent GENOCIDE on BLACK people in this country, killing off so far about 48,000,000 and counting, in 1972 the total Black population in the U.S. was about 22,500,000 or about 11%, in 1990 those went to almost 30,000,000 or about 12.1%, in 2010 the numbers increased to almost 40,000,000 but the percentage only increased to 12.6% but in 2020, is what should pother people about the Democrats war on Black people, the total number in 2020 was 46,900,000 or 12.4%, and right now in 2024, the total number is 47,500,000 or 12.2%, because in 2016, after targeting Black neighborhoods and Black people, the Democrats BEGAN making progress with their plans to EXTERMINATE BLACK people from our country, when Baltimore, became the 1st city in the U.S. to record more black babies aborted than born alive, in 2017, the cities of Detroit, Philadelphia and Boston, joined that list, in 2018, St, Louis, New York City and San Francisco joined that list, and in 2019, Chicago, Kansas City, Pittsburg, Atlanta, Washington D.C. Albany, Milwaukee, Richmond, Los Angeles, Stockton Sacramento, and Albuquerque all joined that list, as the Black population has no likely reached it's peak, and began DECLINING, I truly hope that this DOES NOT CONTINUE.
Paragraphs are your friend.
12:17 I don't know why he added Gulag to the civilian losses in the war? It was a labor camp that existed before World War II. Criminals were kept there.
In those times, teachers, musicians, scientists, or anyone could find themselves in those gulags in no time. It was enough just to say "Stalin is wrong". And your family would never see you again... off to Siberia. In best case... worst case was that your family "joined you".
So, no. Not just criminals were kept in gulags. To be precise, gulags wee mostly for political prisoners, and not for "criminals".
@@ozimakistvan And today politicians are not sitting in prison? 🤷♂
@@ozimakistvan Of course, many were there for political reasons, but the camp was built for criminals. I don't understand why Neil Halloran listed the prisoners as WWII casualties, maybe to show how cruel and ruthless the Soviets are.
@@ozimakistvan People didn't get there by mistake, everyone was there for a reason. You are probably justifying every maniac and rapist who is currently in prison, right?
Moskow Lost 4 Mil Soldsers !