This SImple Investment Switch Could Save You Thousands in Taxes
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 июн 2024
- Saving money isn't enough- the dispersal of your investments has to be optimized. This may take a bit of time or a lot of time, but when it comes to long-term savings, it's imperitive to deploy your funds wisely. In this video, we delve into a common but easily avoidable investing mistake that many Canadians make regarding asset placement between Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSPs) and non-registered accounts. Kent's got a super generic example to illustrate how Canadians, particularly affluent ones, could significantly increase gains by strategically allocating their investments.
We help get you optimized. Email: info@k4financial.ca
Visit our social media accounts:
/ k4financial
/ k4financial
Our Website:
www.k4financial.ca
Kent Warms you Up (00:00:00)
Scenario: RRSPs, GICs (00:00:27)
The Big Difference: RRSP and Non-Registered Accounts (00:01:18)
Tax Implications and Benefits Explained (00:02:53)
Strategic Asset Reallocation for Tax Savings (00:04:27)
Conclusion and Where K4 Might Help (00:06:57)
#RRSP
#TaxEfficiency
#CanadianInvesting
#FinancialPlanning
#RetirementSavings
Don't forget to SUBSCRIBE to stay up-to-date with our latest videos!
_________________________________________________________________
This presentation is just meant to provide information. The accuracy of its contents has been ensured using every available means. Certain statements made may contain forward-looking statements, which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause the Company's or the industry's actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from any projected future results, performance, or achievements. Returns are not certain, and performance in the past might not be replicated.
The content on this channel is provided solely for informative and educational purposes and does not represent investment advice.
The hosts are not liable for the viewers' financial decisions, and their content shouldn't be used as a foundation for investing transactions.
I think its worth noting the obvious for some but may benefit others. Fixed income investment offer NO TAXATION DISCOUNTS and should ideally be held in your TFSA where they are subject to zero tax. When your TFSA is maxxed with Fixed Income, any other FI investments should be within your RSP/RIF to achieve your allocation goals.
Also worth pointing out, equities in your non-registered account are only subject to tax on dividends and distributions year over year. Capital gains tax is only applied when you realize the gain (sell the stock). In a buy and hold year, you will only be subject tax on dividend yields at a typically discounted rate vs interest income.
Thx for the video, Kent. I know you cant get into the weeds for the finer details on youtube but your example is just one more reason a planner can earn their fees tenfold.
Kindly make a video for RESP withdrawal and any strategy required for that. That will be really beneficial for parents whose kids are on that age or going to be.
Could be this is not like thst for tsx efficiency but because they want some safe liquid easly accessible cash. If it's in the rrsp it's kinda locked up or harder to get to in a way
Always depends on the personal situation and how you are doing your own withdrawals. It’s certainly fine to have some safe assets accessible, but to have it all in stuff that isn’t tax efficient seems like a mistake to me
Just curious, what's on your right hand palm? Tattoo?
It was a blister. I was building a fire pit in my back yard and I have weak hands these days.
You are not just changing where your holdings are held, you are also changing your overall asset allocation by doing this! Ben Felix dives deep on this topic: ruclips.net/video/-_YcXV4SuhI/видео.html The inclusion rate change to 2/3 instead of 1/2 is also missing information in this video.
I gave the most simple example I could to explain that it will reduce your taxes, which it will. That was the only point. Personal situations require much more than a basic example.
The inclusion rate doesn't change until well over the amount given in this example so it's a moot point. It's going to affect almost nobody.
You're couples example is not the typical average canadian. Who has 1M each nowadays?
Don’t think I ever said anything about it being a typical example. I use numbers with 1’s and 0’s so that it’s easier for people to understand the concept and not get caught up in the math
I'm still confused. Say I have $1M in GICs inside RRIF, plus $1M in GICs in a non-registered (NR) account, and plan to withdraw $50K + interest earned every year from each account. Assuming 5% interest, then I will get $100K from each account ($50K principle + $50K interest on $1M). However, from the RRIF, I will pay taxes on the full $100K withdraw. But from NR account, I only pay taxes on $50K interest. Assuming 30% overall taxes, I will pay $30K tax on RRIF withdraw and $15K taxes on NR withdraw. So, why is it advantageous to put GICs in registered account?
It isn’t.
I’ll add to this as an edit. I didn’t say anything about taxes on withdrawals, I was talking about taxes on earnings. If you only own GICs, it makes no difference.