What happens when 3 Chinese EVs smash into each other at the same time

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 дек 2024

Комментарии •

  • @electricviking
    @electricviking  3 часа назад +1

    Click here to get a free charger and installation when pre-ordering the G6
    xpeng.com.au/?qr=726XPO
    The best solar company in Australia just installed my new solar system.
    Check them out here:
    www.resinc.com.au/electricviking

  • @ralphzoombeenie2330
    @ralphzoombeenie2330 3 часа назад +6

    China also crash tests high speed trains (no not all 16 cars but the front locomotive unit) There is a doc somewhere on YT. Also very impressive results.

  • @ayushshakya4057
    @ayushshakya4057 4 часа назад +15

    China Ev has come a long way... loved their tech and safety and looks. Watching your videos Sam from Nepal. Love your information and fact videos.

  • @kckfen
    @kckfen 3 часа назад +6

    Yeah i agree, the side protection on the car chasis now can windstand more than 30,000Nm/ degree ( its take more than 30,000Nm force to bend one degree and the A pillar 1500Mpa to 2000Mpa strong equivalent to a submarine structure strong... all this needed to protect the battery at the same time protect the car occupant. However not all Chinese car are build to same, Neta V recently score 0 Asean NCAP star. If you buy from a reputable China brand, like Zeekr, Leapmotor, Xpeng, BYD, usually these car are well build.

  • @yiplekhong5111
    @yiplekhong5111 3 часа назад +4

    Hater will say those test cars are soup up chasis version ..not the actual on the road type.

    • @paulsanders9876
      @paulsanders9876 3 часа назад +2

      No, that was Isuzu ;)

    • @markuc
      @markuc 2 часа назад +2

      That's Toyota as I recall

    • @yiplekhong5111
      @yiplekhong5111 39 минут назад

      @@markuc yup, the big Toyota scandal .

  • @JonNewell
    @JonNewell 4 часа назад +6

    They certainly don’t make them like they used to, TFFT.

  • @kylemacgregor4211
    @kylemacgregor4211 7 минут назад

    All these tests show solid walls, posts or battery pack to battery pack collisions. What happens when a full sized American truck hits the side. The weight of the battery would tend to stay stationary. The bumper and mass of the truck is almost all above that. It seems it would tend to rip the rest of the car off the structural battery pack. Same if you run into the back, front or side of a full sized truck with an EV. In America we,are not lacking full sized lifted trucks. Not many vehicles end up well in those colisions.

  • @reinerfranke5436
    @reinerfranke5436 22 минуты назад

    Why the test operators run after the test collision? Totally stupid, they could fall over the still moving debrie.

  • @scoty_does
    @scoty_does 2 часа назад

    Cool video, one problem if you are going to be intellectually honest the cars hit from complimentary angles. The car in the middle didnt aborb the shock it was spun and saved it from taking more damage.

  • @johnmorris1162
    @johnmorris1162 2 часа назад +1

    Have you seen the videos of collisions into the rear of a truck? The Chinese EVs didn't do too well.

    • @mbak7801
      @mbak7801 Час назад +3

      No car does well though you have to be pretty stupid to hit something that big. Each one improves the average IQ of society a little bit at a time.

    • @whowhy9023
      @whowhy9023 59 минут назад +1

      I think that was a few years ago?

  • @chopinmack5418
    @chopinmack5418 52 минуты назад

    Sam , you make 4-5 videos everyday ! You are hardworking , a lot more than most of the Chinese EV workers !
    It seems that Chinese EV makers have employed a lot of Western engineers on cosmetic & structural designs and
    China engineers are working on Motors , Electronics , Automation Controls , Batteries and Manufacturing .......

  • @davidgutting4317
    @davidgutting4317 4 часа назад +2

    EV’s are definitely improving in safety, I personally would preferr that the battery be plugged in and functioning and given a barrage of tests for fire when the pack gets punctured. It won’t do you any good if you survive the crash only to be roasted and unable to get out the jammed doors after the fact.

    • @nzer57
      @nzer57 4 часа назад +1

      It's not jammed doors its the computer system not allowing a door to open because the circuitry is caput or damaged

    • @davidgutting4317
      @davidgutting4317 3 часа назад +4

      @ Doors are always jammed in a major accident when metal bends. There is a requirement in the US for a mechanical door release for all cars, electric or not. Knowledge is the antidote to fear.

  • @JAnx01
    @JAnx01 49 минут назад

    There would have been a lot more damage had the 2 white cars not crash into the red one. The energy basically transfered into spinning the vehicle.

  • @mbak7801
    @mbak7801 Час назад +1

    Yes Tesla's are safe but not the drivers. They are around if not at the top of the most likely to be killed in a crash. That is because they use their acceleration in inappropriate places and do not have the skills to handle it. The safest cars have a spike in the steering wheel facing the driver. Crashes would just stop.

    • @whowhy9023
      @whowhy9023 Час назад

      Where did you get that statistic.😂😂😂
      In the US Tesla goes over twice the miles between accidents as the average car.
      With FSD engaged it’s 4 X (in 2023). FSD is much safer now.

  • @huatlam8752
    @huatlam8752 2 часа назад +5

    Judging from the comment section, Sam is a CCP spokesman and all Chinese crash test is faked. Am I right or am I right.😂

    • @ZweiZwolf
      @ZweiZwolf 2 часа назад +3

      Weird claim about Euro NCAP testing.

  • @rusticbox9908
    @rusticbox9908 3 часа назад +1

    Getting hit on two sides is quite realistic for people that love to run the red light on intersections. 😂
    But having them hit on TWO different places in ONE test means they save one car from destruction as opposed to doing two different test using 4 vehicles.

    • @ZweiZwolf
      @ZweiZwolf 2 часа назад

      The hard part of a double collision is that there's less freedom for the struck car to move, and therefore, reduce the intensity of the impact by spreading it out over a greater distance. Try slicing cheese hanging in the air, vs on a chopping block. If the struck car can move, it can potentially spin or slide, transferring more of the impact energy into tire friction while absorbing the momentum. If the struck car can't move, it's more like going into a concrete wall.

    • @rusticbox9908
      @rusticbox9908 2 часа назад

      @ZweiZwolf yes, some test have the stationary vehicle pinned down to a concrete block. But the manufacturer have great confidence in that car!

  • @dyhppyx
    @dyhppyx 2 часа назад +4

    I'm Chinese. I would never trust a Chinese made car but I'm considering your evidence.

    • @FrankiePo89
      @FrankiePo89 2 часа назад

      There's more than 1.5b Chinese, short of you don't really matter.

    • @Tony-cs5hq
      @Tony-cs5hq 2 часа назад +5

      You can be whatever you like in internet, still you are not relevant

    • @ZweiZwolf
      @ZweiZwolf 2 часа назад

      LOL, go Vietnamese Vinfast - 2 out of 5 under NHTSA DOT, 4 out of 5 Euro NCAP.

    • @pitsanufangkaew
      @pitsanufangkaew 46 минут назад +1

      you are Chinese , really ???

  • @TD-yj8ch
    @TD-yj8ch 2 часа назад

    appreciate u being an objective Aussie

  • @nzer57
    @nzer57 4 часа назад +1

    The structural side of things is nothing new. What I would be more interested in is how does the battery and its array of leads to motors cope in a collision. The battery may not explode or catch fire but the energy it contains is capable of discharging via cables/leads etc and that could be catastrophic. It's the same as a fuel tank rupturing and its contents catching fire.

    • @ralphzoombeenie2330
      @ralphzoombeenie2330 2 часа назад +1

      Driving a vehicle on public roads has an element of risk no matter what mode. Biggest threat is the human drivers.

    • @ZweiZwolf
      @ZweiZwolf 2 часа назад

      It's not at all the same, given that auto fuel is design to burn and batteries are not.

  • @nekiloso2692
    @nekiloso2692 49 минут назад

    I think I have at least 10 years in me...let's talk again so as not to waste air now :) good luck

  • @DaxVJacobson
    @DaxVJacobson 4 часа назад +3

    China putting this info out makes me think China wants to get people to forget how well the Tesla Model 3 did when it hit a stopped semi-truck with most other cars tested in China did very poorly

    • @zes3813
      @zes3813 4 часа назад +1

      Nah, sour grape. Nobody knows what the fiction you are talking about. Joshua Brown in Model S died when crashing into a tractor. Nobody cares, and nobody does semi-truck crash tests. And except you, any say any nmw and any s perfect.

    • @hynoor7254
      @hynoor7254 3 часа назад +2

      that was unfair test, bcz position M3 is way lower than other cars in the tests, they're paid not to use Model Y as the A pillar is the same position as other cars in the test.

    • @mbak7801
      @mbak7801 Час назад +1

      Yet being killed in a Tesla is right up there as the driver is probably either showing off or climbing into the rear seats relying on autopilot. This is not a glib comment the numbers do actually show this. Have a tesla and drive sensibly then apart from being hit by another out of control Tesla you should be fairly safe.

  • @markwinship6527
    @markwinship6527 4 часа назад

    US automobile market is worth $1.1 trillion and China $0.8 trillion. Do you count widgets or value?

    • @changliu3915
      @changliu3915 3 часа назад +9

      Don't know where you get that figure from but in terms of units in 2023 China sold 29.3% and US 18% of the world total. If you are just using dollar value then it is not a fair measure as for the same car say VW iD4 Chinese prices is almost a 1/3. Adjusted for purchasing power China is still way ahead. No surprise there as if you use PPP to measure size of economy China is about 1.2x US already in 2023. In terms of NEVs China was 60% of the world sales and US 10% in 2023, 2024will be even higher.

    • @FrankiePo89
      @FrankiePo89 3 часа назад +7

      An orange cost you a dollar in the us, that same orange can be gotten at 20 cents in China. See the difference?

    • @swagataraha7396
      @swagataraha7396 2 часа назад +1

      Equivalent to $ 3.31 Trillion in China then

  • @xprt642
    @xprt642 3 часа назад +1

    They are stil craap but cheap. EU EVs are also craap but expensive.

    • @ralphzoombeenie2330
      @ralphzoombeenie2330 2 часа назад +3

      Have you driven an EV?

    • @xprt642
      @xprt642 2 часа назад

      @ralphzoombeenie2330 it's irrelevant how it drives when it is brand new. All forums and FB groups are full of people with EV problems, even if the car is weeks old.

    • @mbak7801
      @mbak7801 Час назад

      @@xprt642 They are also full of people with problems with ICE cars. Quite a few of the EV complaints are obviously fake as well. I mean so fake as to be laughable.

  • @nonchalanto
    @nonchalanto 4 часа назад +4

    Yea because the Chinese would never produce a video that wasn’t a 100% honest depiction of reality.

    • @888YangJi
      @888YangJi 4 часа назад +2

      if you are done with living in denial, then go watch EU NCAP crash test on Chinese vehicles done in EU administered by EU officials.

    • @albback8176
      @albback8176 4 часа назад +9

      Not sure what you're saying, since you used a double negative.

    • @yulusleonard985
      @yulusleonard985 4 часа назад +3

      You need to know that US spend 80 billions for anti China propaganda since 2016 and this year they add more. For comparison they only spend 70 on Ukraine.

    • @OmPom-h9o
      @OmPom-h9o 4 часа назад +2

      ​@@albback8176 Americans are like that. They don't know what they say and also what to say

    • @nonchalanto
      @nonchalanto 4 часа назад +2

      @ Yes, it’s called being sarcastic. Read the sentence carefully, and if you still don’t understand-I don’t know how to help you.

  • @darwinstubbie860
    @darwinstubbie860 3 часа назад +2

    Dear Electric Guru. EVs are a religion that I will never follow no matter how many videos you make and most Aussies feel the same way.

    • @RossBurrell-w8g
      @RossBurrell-w8g 3 часа назад +5

      Your on the wrong channel! Unless you like being a troll. If being a smart arse floats your boat? Other wise go watch sky news

    • @ralphzoombeenie2330
      @ralphzoombeenie2330 3 часа назад +3

      This one doesn't and has two EVs, both Chinese. Not a religion just common sense and economics for my requirements. No gas bill in 7yrs or home electricity bill in 13yrs works for me thanks to Chinese solar system

    • @linphilip6389
      @linphilip6389 2 часа назад +3

      you do not represent aussies. according to global agreement, every nation must meet carbon emission standard. you can go live in antartica.

    • @dallasdrew2390
      @dallasdrew2390 2 часа назад +5

      Dear E.V. hater.....most Australian's don't have any problem with E.V.s it's only in your own mind and you are in the minority.

  • @nekiloso2692
    @nekiloso2692 50 минут назад

    ok man...how much are you getting paid for this obvious and painful propaganda ?