CONNECTING STAIRS WITH BASE AND TOP CONCRETE SLAB / PROBLEM SOLVED

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 дек 2024

Комментарии • 14

  • @bimedin
    @bimedin  Год назад

    RECTANGULAR STAIR CONNECTION AT THE BASE CONCRETE SLAB WITH MATERIAL TAKEOFF / TIPS AND TRICKS
    ruclips.net/video/-lMSytmHp8w/видео.html

  • @martinminkov1704
    @martinminkov1704 Год назад +2

    Great video! Congratulations! Could you make a spiral staircase video please?

    • @bimedin
      @bimedin  Год назад

      Thank you for your support and comments. I'm pretty busy these days.
      As soon as I get a chance, I will record a new tutorial related to your question.

  • @SERGE-gf8fk
    @SERGE-gf8fk Месяц назад

    Brillant ! But you are lucky that you have straitght stairs! What about U-turn stairs ? Can you apply the same method for connecting the top floor with the stairs ?

  • @ncarreroc
    @ncarreroc 3 месяца назад

    Greatly useful! Thank you so much

  • @MoNasr26
    @MoNasr26 Год назад +2

    Great idea, but what about using model in place for missing concrete triangle below stair "easy way", or modeling real landing insted of tiny landing you use
    Without needing to change landing thickness or separate the stair "you need to modify slab sketch to prevent overlapping"

    • @bimedin
      @bimedin  Год назад

      ruclips.net/video/-lMSytmHp8w/видео.htmlsi=ymoA7GUiNrmVnDdK
      Thank you for your comment and support. On this link there is a tutorial for the rectangular connection of the staircase with the base concrete slab and the calculation of the materials for the staircase.
      The upper landing is thin for 2 reasons:
      - due to situations where there is not enough space for landing
      - due to differences in the materials of the final layer of the floor and staircase (avoiding problems with joining the staircase and floor)

  • @bojandjekic1
    @bojandjekic1 9 месяцев назад +1

    Svaka cast Edine. Vrlo originalno i inteligentno resenje.
    Ali ovo resenje {kao i ostala na YT za ovaj specifican problem} prati tu neku Revit logiku a ne logiku prakse? U praksi {kako u birou tako i na terenu} taj zadnji stepenik se nece izlivati u svojoj punoj visini vec ce biti nizi {to jest utopice se sa plocom} a puna visina se dalje formira putem kosuljice i ostalih slojeva poda iz MK. Da li ima nekog nacina da se to prenese i u Revit model?
    P.S. Meni je jedino palo na pamet da se formiraju dvoje stepenista, jedno na drugome, s time sto je donje monolitno samo od AB a drugo {ono na} da je samo od sloja gazista i cela? Medjutim, malo mi deluje sumanuto i prekomplikovano, krajnje ne prakticno...

    • @bimedin
      @bimedin  9 месяцев назад +1

      Hvala na komentarima i na podršci.
      Revit omogućava velike olakšice na polju arhitekture, ali nažalost, nekad nema rešenja za veoma jednostavne probleme kakve ste upravo naveli.
      Moj predlog je da u preseku slojeve poda u zadnjem stepeniku iscrtate pomoću Filled Region alatke. Mislim da je jednostavnije nego da modelirate duplo stepenište.
      Opet kod manjih objekata izbor metode modeliranja stepeništa i ne menja toliko konačan rezultat, problem se javlja kada su veliki objekti u pitanju, gde imamo na desetine ili stotine stepeništa.
      Ako dođem do nekog praktičnijeg resenja objaviću tutorijal.
      LP

    • @bojandjekic1
      @bojandjekic1 9 месяцев назад +1

      @@bimedin
      Hvala ti na odgovoru Edine, zaista.
      Da bice da je to ipak najrazumnije reseje. Nalepiti Filled Region preko i terati dalje.
      Veliki pozdrav i hvala ti na videima, pratim sa merakom...

  • @ahmedfadel5978
    @ahmedfadel5978 7 месяцев назад +1

    Excellent

  • @marlonreyes3499
    @marlonreyes3499 Год назад +1

    Stairs in concrete landing in between