@@thegirlonfiredolls... A little bit of a negative are non brown eyes but people switch eyeballs on these dolls so that isn't too bad of a negative. Blue eyes with this skin tone look more like a blind doll representation but other R.H. dolls with brown eyes and lighter skin tones would look better in these eyeballs.
@@lawrencejelsma8118 i wish we had more rh dolls with brown eyes i feel like theres not many and its usually either blue or purple ugh..ive tried swiching their eyes once on a rh doll i had and it was sooo hard im not doing it again..my hands were hurtin so bad afterwards from pushin and moving the eyes in etc.
@@thegirlonfiredolls... 😂 That is because MGA copies all of Mattel's bad habits. Mattel Barbies don't have multiple skin tones in their Made To Move successful bodies. Instead they go back to creating different skin tones in their inarticulated and awkward eye paints Fashionista bodies. They aren't creating all the time for the doll collectors. They are trying to gain basic cheapened play dolls of higher sales volumes I am guessing they get Internationally. The painted eyes on Fashionista bodies are almost always a problem with trying to buy Mattel Barbies. I am always annoyed with skin tones and choices made in their Made To Move line. R. H. was fine until this year. I think Shadow High ruined their initial excitement to give us quality and inexpensive great dolls.
@lawrencejelsma8118 yeh they makin soo many basic non articulated barbies with diff skin tones and faces and hair. im not into barbie that much but theres a few new ones that are pretty cute but i wouldnt want to rebody em which like u said can be hard to match skin tone bodies. also i feel like articulsted ones arent that easy to find here in canada but idk. yeh rh was good until this new slime ones and it sucked too when before they one came with 1 outfit. from the new rh im kinda interested in a few but idk if ill actually get em if i do its on sale
She's so pretty! ❤
agree, shes def my fav from the rh color create dolls
@@thegirlonfiredolls... A little bit of a negative are non brown eyes but people switch eyeballs on these dolls so that isn't too bad of a negative. Blue eyes with this skin tone look more like a blind doll representation but other R.H. dolls with brown eyes and lighter skin tones would look better in these eyeballs.
@@lawrencejelsma8118 i wish we had more rh dolls with brown eyes i feel like theres not many and its usually either blue or purple ugh..ive tried swiching their eyes once on a rh doll i had and it was sooo hard im not doing it again..my hands were hurtin so bad afterwards from pushin and moving the eyes in etc.
@@thegirlonfiredolls... 😂 That is because MGA copies all of Mattel's bad habits. Mattel Barbies don't have multiple skin tones in their Made To Move successful bodies. Instead they go back to creating different skin tones in their inarticulated and awkward eye paints Fashionista bodies. They aren't creating all the time for the doll collectors. They are trying to gain basic cheapened play dolls of higher sales volumes I am guessing they get Internationally. The painted eyes on Fashionista bodies are almost always a problem with trying to buy Mattel Barbies. I am always annoyed with skin tones and choices made in their Made To Move line. R. H. was fine until this year. I think Shadow High ruined their initial excitement to give us quality and inexpensive great dolls.
@lawrencejelsma8118 yeh they makin soo many basic non articulated barbies with diff skin tones and faces and hair. im not into barbie that much but theres a few new ones that are pretty cute but i wouldnt want to rebody em which like u said can be hard to match skin tone bodies. also i feel like articulsted ones arent that easy to find here in canada but idk. yeh rh was good until this new slime ones and it sucked too when before they one came with 1 outfit. from the new rh im kinda interested in a few but idk if ill actually get em if i do its on sale