Why Pandavas Went To Hell And Kauravas Went To Heaven | After Mahabharata Part 2
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 июл 2024
- Artwork courtesy of The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust International, Inc.
www.krishna.com/
Why Pandavas Went To Hell And Kauravas Went To Heaven | After Mahabharata Part 2
0:00 Introduction
0:42 Yudhishtira Enters Heaven
0:55 Yudhishtira Meets Duryodhana
1:41 Kauravas Reason to Enter Heaven
2:55 Yudhishtira Enters Hell
3:52 Yudhishtira Meets Brothers and Wife
5:14 The Reveal
5:36 Yudhishtira's Only Sin
This video is a continuation of our previous video on the death of Draupadi and the four Pandavas. To know about the biggest sins of their life and how it led to their death, watch the video linked below:
• The Biggest Sins Of Pa...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Please Like, Share and Subscribe our videos.**
Press the bell button to stay notified about our new videos!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
1. Some parts from this video like music, pictures and videos are sourced from the web. The Hindu Saga does not declare any ownership and is ready to give the rights to whoever it is due.
2. Multiple sources have been referred to create the content and story for the videos and we try our best to produce good content that seems authentic to our knowledge, however, we do not confirm the authenticity of the content and stories shared on channel.
3. Some of the links are affiliate links, which means if you use that link to buy something, I get a small kickback at no extra cost to you. :)
#TheHinduSaga
#IndianHistory #HinduHistory #Hinduism #IndianMythology #HinduMythology #HinduGods #ReligionExplained
Watch the first part of this video here: ruclips.net/video/95x6zLfr3DU/видео.html
We have to learn from our epics, but now also some of our relatives are not liked by us ,there competition, jealousy,feud over property only era has changed feelings the same
.
The desire to merge with God is known as spiritual suicide. It is stated in the actual story that the living entities are eternally individual. Guiding people to a concocted path of impersonalism is also expressly condemned therein.
Pandava did not go to hell, pls read properly mahabharata
I think yudhisthir was the biggest sinner for having gambled his wife as if she was an object. One of the biggest sin as per markandeya puran
Yes ...I do not understand why his virtues are considered great.
Absolutely! I don't understand why he claimed as Dharmaraj!
Yes true he doesn't own his bros and wife he doesn't have the right to gamble them
Yes He was wrong ...Because he followed the rules of dyut sabha superseding hid duty of a Husband ,, So did Everyone in Mahabharat Bhishma gave prefrence to his own Wows , Shakuni had his own agenda , Druthrashtra was Blinded with nepotism .. Draupadi was also on the path of doing the same , By cursing both Pandavas and kauravas ,UNTIL Lord Krishna persuaded her otherwise and asked her to make her fight against Injustice a Representation of all Women who have been subject to Mistreatment and Insult , He promised her that He will Lead the fight and see it reaches Logical Conclusion
@@mandirachowdhury2995 Yudhistier only committed two sins in his life staking Draupadi and half-lie he said to Drona.
During the war, Bhima did kill an elephant named Ashwatthama which was an elephant. But while Yudhisthira broke the news to Acharya Drona, he mentioned it as: Ashwatthama Ataha, Kunjara. Kunjara was told under the breath of Yudhishthira so the Acharya could not hear it and thus gave up on this life assuming that his son attained martyrdom.
He said it clearly it was krishna who blows his sankha at the time so he can only hear his son name .. krishna is a cunning character all this happen cuz of him n his cunning tactics he probably loved fueling the whole brother fighting brother and enjoy from sideline
Is this scene from dana veera sura karna(telugu film)?
Because i have seen the scene somewhere in the past but i don't remember
@@ruthlessborg Shri Krishna is not cunning at all. If you read the preceding of all their souls, purpose of life, you'd not make this ignorant Comment.
It is hatha meaning dead or killed not ataha
@@ruthlessborg Have you ever done any research on lord Krishna before writing your fóolish comment? 🤦🏻♂️ Immediately APOLOGIZE to lord Krishna for your undeserving words... Yudhishtra went to hell not because he told a white lie. Mahabharata is very clear that he says *_"Ashwathama hatha"_* loudly and adds "kunjarah" under his breath, meaning that Ashwathama the elephant is dead. So he did not lie, not even a white lie. But he went to hell because he did not trust the God at that moment. He DISOBEYED lord Krishna who asked him to say only "Ashwathama hatha". For this disobedience & loss of faith in the actions of Krishna, he went to hell.
i feel like im in middle of meditation by the way you explained it
Then watch Indian monk too 👍🏻
Thank you :)
Same
Same even I felt
@ New day new dose:
What kind of meditation do you do?
I was impressed with this video initially until I realized that Hindu Saga is presenting differing versions of the topic in question, which are contradictory.
It's better to be in hell with friends than in heaven with enemies
Perhaps better to be in hell with good people than in heaven with evil! Thank you for watching :)
No
@@THEHINDUSAGA if the pandavas have been good then they would have been in heaven .
To hell with Bros, than with hos.
Ruling in hell>Serving in heaven
A partial truth(or a lie) to weaken the heart of a warrior was considered as a Sin. The sins committed to weaken people's moral are the biggest sins.
Also, the way Arjun killed Karna was against all ethics.
Real Mahabharatha starts after the Kurukshethra war, where the philosophy of right and wrong were analyzed in deep.
Bro but who was following ethics? The whole Mahabharata happened bcs nobody followed ethics since beginning. Not following ethics or dharma is the reason why Lord Vishnu had to incarnate as Sri Krishna in order to establish dharma. Isn't that the whole point of Mahabharata?
this is the whole point of Mahabharata.
Crazy that the whole earth currently viralling misrepresented truth left and right. Truly a kaliyug
What about Yudhishtira's gambling problem? It seems to me that he was as much a sinner as the other Pandavas and Draupadi and in no position to talk about why the others had to die. Maybe if he knew when to stop gambling, the Kauravas wouldn't have had the chance to try disrobing Draupadi and the war might not have been necessary? But he just could not stop.
He was goaded and compelled to gamble by the crafty Shakuni the uncle as it was clearly a setup from the word go. The game is called cowries and it was rigged by Shakuni so that the Kauravas could outrage the modesty of Draupadi. Yudhishthir was often referred as "Dharamraj" meaning a man of great honor. The idea was that since he was Dharamraj, he would have to honor the wager and fulfill the condition of disrobing Draupadi which was to be "won" by cheating. Otherwise Yudhishthir was never a gambler being Dharamraj.
@@dineshthakar4207 why did he agree with using draupadi as pawn to gamble ? That thought itself makes me question why not just accept defeat than gambling your wife away
@@Ishuuuxix according to rules by shakuni which everyone agreed , both person need to play until they have something to be proud of . That's why he bet himself and later was asked to bet Draupadi by Shakuni.
@@SHIVYADAV-fm5gz if the he asked for maa kunti would dharamraj still play the game ?
he got vanavas and agyatwas as punishment so he got freed from that sin
We all must have heard these stories as youngsters, it is nice to revisit them. You are doing a very good job, please continue and best wishes. As I am in mid 50s, with age and experience I feel the concept of heaven and hell was created to make us human beings behave in an ethical, moral, scrupulous and honest manner. I don’t know if heaven and hell exists after our death, but with good behavior we can experience heaven on earth and with bad behavior we can experience hell on earth. I have no idea if the concept of rebirth is true, but being a Hindu I believe in it. If we do good deeds, we always experience the effect of it in our lives. We should learn from mythology and history that certain attributes and characteristics ( like honesty, charity, justice, etc) never go out of ‘fashion’ as these have stood the test of time.
Just today I came across your channel and subscribed to it. Thank you and God bless you
Yes
You have a very beautiful voice! Please keep making such videos, they are really fascinating and intriguing.
In the Bengali version of Mahabharata, I've read that Yudishthira said, "Ashwathama iti (and) gojo (under his breath)", which means Ashwathama is no more (iti) gojo (elephant).
I see now. Depending on your good actions you spend some time in heaven, and also you go to hell because of your bad actions. But not for the eternity
But these will be calculated not just Human earth years but in Divine Deva God years, these years were so much more long than we could understand instantly!
Again once after completing all such pious and sins people should take birth on the planet that they got came from and live the life again to suffer from karma for their sins and enjoy for their pious activities!
That's why it's a best thing to cancel out all these pious and sins in their lifetimes that leads one to come out from this deadly trapy death and birth Cycles and reach God happily finally!💐
True , even i learned it few days earlier that it's not that ur gud deeds can cut ur bad sins but thier will be outcome of both nd u will get both
To all judging Yudhishter ... sad to see you focusing on the one time he went wrong in his whole life because of Shakuni. It would be hard for today's generation to be in Yudhistra's shoes. That was the time when people were known for their words. The identity of a virtuous man was judged on how much can he stand by his words. Shakuni knew how to use this in a negative way. You have to see the whole sequence of events that led him to bet draupadi. A perfect plot was master minded by Shakuni that even the most virtuous people like Bheeshma and Drona couldn't do anything. Again the point is that was a different time. People simply can't go back on their words. Mahabharata is not about showing Pandavas in a positive sense... but it's about how one got to react in different situations ... Sometimes one has to be wrong to deal with wrong ... So let's stick with the learning we can get of human experience rather than judging them from today's bigoted lenses
I believe everyone is responsible for his/her Karma. Shakuni was able to weave an elaborate plan against the Pandavas due to Yudhishthir's weakness. Gambling addiction was his vice but betting the lives of his brothers and wife was sinful. He did not stand by his words. He did not protect his brothers. He forgot his vows to Draupadi. Shakuni was not doubt worse but the decision to bet his family was Yudhishthir's very own. And not only Yudhishthir but all the people present in the court were the silent/active part-takers in the sin. Also, it is not necessary to be wrong to deal with the wrong. What had Lord Ram done wrong that he had to deal with the wrong? All in all, Mahabharat does depict many virtues, vices, decisions and their effects. But no version elaborates this sin as Yudhishthir's worst sin. Instead the white lie of Ashwatthama's death is always recalled as Yudhishthir's greatest sin.
@@manasishah3577 Lord Rama killed Bali behind his back ... which is wrong specially for someone of the stature of Lord Ram ... I didn't say Yudhister was right. Every human being is born with some weaknesses. Shakuni played a good plot. About gambling his brothers and his wife and even himself ... That was the era when people were owned by the king. Even woman were owned by their husband ... there is a reason why woman back then referred to their husband as swami. Even Bhishma confirmed that even though It was Yudhisters fault to keep playing but he had the right to gamble his wife . Again as I said that was a different time. He made a mistake and made sure that he redemp himself of it on earth itself. This blot shouldn't take away the fact that he is the most virtuous, kind hearted and just ruler the world has ever seen.
The only reason why I cannot consider Yudhishthir as a kind, virtuous and just person is his gambling addiction. He lost in the first round of Go as well but was then let go. He repeated the mistake again even after the advice from his family. Not only that but he also bet his brothers and wife. That alone makes me think that even if he bacame the King after the war, there always remains a possibility of him repeating the same thing had there been a Shakuni v2. If he was such a just person he could even have voiced out his disagreement when Eklavy and Karan were not given the chance to learn from Dronacharya. I might be baised and I know it was supposed to role out in this manner only but I still can't agree that he was Dharmaraj. Btw, you reasoned it very well. The society that time had this perception of the King or the head of the family being the decision maker. Though our other puranas also say that a women is not an object and should be respected, the whole of Kuruvansh forgot that. Mahabharata taught us that even learning from the best does not make a difference of you don't apply it in real life and our ignorance, greed and ego can lead to the downfall of the whole nation.
@@manasishah3577 Typical misconceptions. It is all Lord Krishna's leela being enacted with much deeper meanings underlying it all. Go to Amazon and get the 2 volumes of God Talks With Arjuna and get enlightened. Hindu Saga ought to verify information from scholars before uploading videos that create havoc.
@@manasishah3577 Using addiction word is too harsh as there is no were written of him being addicted to gambling. After losing everything in gambling and gaining them back through blessings by Dritarashtra to draupadi ... They were called again for one final game ... Even after knowing that he cannot win against Shakuni ... He still agreed because he could not say no to his father like king dirthrashtra ... It wasn't easy back then when it came to choices... people were bound to promises ... even words made in their previous life ... why do you think no one holds bhesshma and Drona being equally responsible for letting everything happening in front of them ... Because they were bound by their promise of allegiance to kauravs ... This whole betting scene was bound to happen... lord rama going after a golden deer knowing it's impossible for a golden deer to exist was bound to happen .
Thanks for the beautiful vídeo 🙏🏼
🙏 Your story telling transformed me into the story- as if I was witnessing post Mahabharata 👏👏👌
The second version is the real interpretation of principles of Karma. Everyone who comes to this world has to endure both the effects - I.e the effects of good deeds and the bad ones separately. It means that the good deeds you do will not cancel or compensate for your bad deeds. One will pay for their bad deeds and will get paid for their good deeds. This is essential too, because otherwise people would start doing bad deeds followed by good ones so that the good ones will compensate for their bad ones.
So, to conclude-
You are rewarded separately for all your good deeds and you are penalised for your bad deeds and both the accounts(good deeds and bad deeds) are maintained separately.
Your voice is therapeutic
Your channel is growing so rapidly that one day I think it will reach of 100k so soon
The sins of the pandavas do not count up to 1 / 1000th part of only shakunis sins, what to speak of the rest. But as Keshava said, a good person is judged harsher than a demon.. He himself talked to kauravas despite knowing that they are blocks of stone and wood. Balarama nearly destroyed hastinapura for this. But it was krishna who destroyed them when all goodwill had failed.
One of best niche channels on RUclips, with so details yet so less engagement
This only shows injustice and manipulation at every stage, even in the court of Yamaraj. So many virtues of the Pandavas were minimised against a few sins. And on the other hand one or two good deeds of Kauravas fell heavily on all the sins that they committed. Ridiculous!!!!! No doubt why mortals are not afraid of committing sins in the present time.
Very true
These are different versions of a story by different people.
The first version probably written/said by someone with Karma Path of religion.
He tried to give emphasis and more importance to Duty rather than other good things.
What version you choose is upto you.
For me it's second version of story.
It was just a Test (like many he faced in his whole life) of Yudhishthira - the righteous one.
History is always written by the winner's perspective. No matter what the real events were!
they said its a 500 years of creative creation by various writers. modern philosophers believe it was a collective sue-side
@@padisalashanthan98 But Mahabharata history wasn't written by any winner, it was written by Vedvyasa who was a partial incarnation of the God himself. So you cannot doubt on his writing regarding Pandavas and Kauravas.
WOW!! This was a seriously beautiful video!! Jai Shree Krishna 🕉🙏🕉🕉🙏🕉
Nice Info!!
Great Video
Thank you for watching :)
I like your channel and it's content. Its easy to understand and encourage us to know more about our religious Stories.
Actually there is more to the story
Krishna also says that while climbing the mountain yudhishtar gave up on his brothers and wife, as it was all worldly things, and didn't even cry for their death
So if he had attached himself from his loved ones why did he ask to stay in hell
10/10 for the background score......very soothing
She has such a nice voice.
Lord Vishnu was impressed with the acts of King Kuru and blessed him with two boons-first, that this land forever will be known as a Holy Land after his name as Kurukshetra (the land of Kuru); second that anyone dying on this land will go to heaven.
U mean the taliban are also in heaven
but the land is called india now....
But yudhisthira did clarified it to dronacharya that ashwatthama the elephant has died... but when he uttered the word elephant.. at exact that moment.. krishna blew the shankh..(sea shell) and due to the loud sound of the shell.. dronacharya could not hear the word elephant... so technically, umm this was not yudhistira misrepresenting the fact😅... also ,i think his sin was to try and gamble his wife in a fucking dice game.. like who gave him this authority or right to gamble away a woman? She is an individual and no one owns her... thats the sin of yudhishtira😒
Well explained!
Well explained
Thank you for watching :)
Adding to your words, Dhrishtadyumna was not only a warrior, he was Draupadi's brother.
Absolutely brilliant.
I feel like I am in deep meditation while listening you.
Just never stop making videos ❤
Never understood all these when I was in school studying such lessons, thank you for these videos.
which school teaches these stories??
@@sanket_suryawanshiVKV
Your voice is soo good and soft ❤️
Vry peaceful explanation 🙆🏽♀️🌺👏👏👏👍🏻
Very nice educational video
Good video. 👍
Excellent
Love the reveal
The narrative is very good 👍 watching just because of that
You could say went to hell, but in actuality, their genes were left on earth to help create the future generations.
For celestials, earth is the underworld/hell.
Nice ending
In 'Kauravas reason to enter heaven', the reason of why they are in heaven is kind of a similar thought which is used to brainwash people before they became a terrorist. As they've been said that be brave as a warrior and asked to do so called God's work. (Just a thought 😁).
Bty love your videos and the way of Narrating the story. ❤🔥
Thankyou very much
Great story 👍👍👍
Glad you enjoyed it
Ajay Singh; A fairytale based on mithya.
I was so focussed I couldn't believe👍👍
I am confused about one thing though: after people's death, they are supposed to leave their mortal bodies and then enter hell or heaven. Then how is it that the unbearable torture of hell includes physical torture? Without a body how is it possible to inflict physical pain upon someone?
Nobody have seen the scene of hell. The literature is just trying the easiest way to make people understand pain. Do not take it in the literal meaning.
@@sanathoi_irom6250 But is there any deeper explanation of pain without the mortal body? It kinda intrigues me
I gotta admit that's a very good question
@@moonpearl4711 When the body stays a unit, wherever an injury occurs, the whole body is anxious about the pain. Lets assume a finger is detached and when the detached finger is burnt, the rest of the body wouldn't feel the pain of the detached finger. Pain is not suffered separately. Pain is sufferred together. We are a part that feels detached like the finger. One day, your pain and suffering will become my pain and suffering just like we both are a part of one body. We are all connected mate
@@sanathoi_irom6250 I get your point but what you are saying is more about losing the sense of me rather than individual pain in hell. Before repaying the debts of mortal life the souls don't get connected together right? Then before that how does pain without a physical body feel like?
actually when yudhisthir concurred on Ashwathama's demise he continued to say what really happened, but Krishn blew a Conch to cover what he had to say,
anyway Drona was already in shock hearing what has been done, dropped his weapon and sat on the ground. Taking the advantage of the moment Dhristaduymn beheaded dron for he killed drupad (drhistaduymn's father)
first of all. why he need to inform Acharya Drona about some elephant which is named same as his son is dead. he knew it is a planned lie story to kill Acharya Drona. simple. nothing to explain about this lie anymore. he knew it's a lie and said it. if I post in twiiter like lord krisna is raped next door girl name called rani and in next twitter. oh by the lord krisna is our dog name and rani is next door female dog name. people will claim about this?
@@agan9993 First of all Mind your language. Lord Krishna is not a human like you, so he cannot rápe your next door girl named raani and in Twitter. And Krishna is the God's name, *Allah* is your Dog's name, and raani in next door female dog's name. People won't claim about this. By the way, I named my two dogs Allah and JESUS. They sound cute 😉
Where do you get this information
From books or did time travel by borrowing the time machine from H G Wells
Your voice took me to heaven and felt like I did a deep meditation ❤️🙏
To all judging yudhishthir, I want to say that-
1. Duryodhan gave him a order to put his wife for gamble and when he opposed he said he is dharmbadh to chakravati samrat and everything.
2. So yudhishthir came up with an idea and he said sakuni to change the dice because he felt soemthing wring with the dice
3. When sakuni and duryodhan refused, even though he was a slave he crushed the dices in front of the sabha of hastinapura. And said them to bring new dice or stop the game.
4. But the cunning sakuni somehow joined the dice back again and told yudhishthir that it was new dices and not the ones made out of his father's ashes.
5. Therefore yudhishthir had no option except playing with them.
6. They could not have broken the dharma when draupadi was brought to the court by opposing the kauravas. But it doesn't mean he was not sad as well. He felt terrible too, because he loved draupadi as much.
7. He was wrong when he tried to prevent war but again it was dwarparyug and he was dharmaraj, he didn't want to tear down his own family. He knew not only kauravas will die but people of the country would be at loss. He thought of the welfare of Bharat. So therefore he swallowed his ego and was sacrifing his inner feeling of revenge for the well being of his family and the citizens of bharat at the time of dwaparyuga.
When Draupadi asked him the question when he had lost himself and had no right over anybody how could he bet on her? He couldnt answer. That question still remains.
@@deeksharajpoot1307 the basic rule of Chauser is simple if you have anything an object/property/asset you are eligible to play. You cannot left the game after losing Hastinapur he lost his all brothers only Draupadi was left , be played in the hope that what if he wins by winning Draupadi he could get everything back what he has lost. So technically he was playing with rules. so playing with rules is considered as Dharm. That's what I think
@@anshwaghela3907 no don't connect dharm with it
@@deeksharajpoot1307 He did not forcefully bet Draupadi in the game, it was an *_overconfidencial accident,_* and that's why Pandavas later apologized to Draupadi and lord Krishna. They asked for the forgiveness from lord Krishna unlike Karna and Kauravas who never said sorry to Draupadi for their wrong doings for at even once.
@@deeksharajpoot1307 Hello Deeksha. Dharmaraja lost himself to kauravas. Now Duryodhana and Shakuni are his masters. Then realizing that only draupadi is left to bet, shakuni/duryodhana asks dharmaraja to bet his wife. As he has to obey the orders of his master, dharmaraja bets his wife. What kauravas did was totally wrong. A master cant force his servant (female) to give up her chastity. He don't have any right over her except to command her to serve them with materialistic things as other servants do.
Even draupadi asks everyone in Sabha that "Whether his her husband lost himself and kept her as bet OR Whether he kept her first as bet , lost her and lost himself?"
Yudhisthira never had a 'gambling problem' as people in the comments are calling it. If one of the reasons Kauravas were in heaven was that they fulfilled their duty, the same should be applied to Yudhisthira. Dhritarashtra had asked Yudhisthira to participate in the game of dice after Kauravas had challenged him. In those days, a warrior should accept any challenge given to him, it was his duty. Not only that, but it was also Yudhisthira's duty as a nephew to obey the orders of his uncle, Dhritarashtra.
Shakuni, aka one of the masterminds of Mahabharata, forced Yudhisthira to stake himself, his brothers, and his wife. Yudhisthira was helpless in front of Shakuni.
ABSOLUTELY DO NOT judge anyone from the epics if you've only watched those dramatic serials and have not taken a single effort to read the actual thing. The serials change the plot to gain viewers.
Oh, and one more thing; the epics were written down for the people of Kaliyuga (us) to learn from them, and not question them.
Yudhisthira was called 'Dharmaraj' for a reason. Instead of searching for his mistakes, try to learn from him. Do not comment on anything as if you're the most sin-less person on Earth.
thank you for your hard work, bringing this in videos 👍
This is amazing!!! ❤️🙏
Wow!
It is also said that Yudisthira’s sin was hesitating to follow the order of Lord Krishna. Thank You for these wonderful videos
I could be wrong but Yudhishthira not being a sinner could be right. He followed his dharma as a King and when a King loses, he has to give up his everything. Now his dharma as a King collides with his dharma as a husband (since as a husband he should defend his wife). But, in his thoughts, the dharma that would effect most number of people was more important than losing one person in his life. Yes he was wrong, but it's all about Dharma or Duty. One of the first instances of collision of duties is this part.
When they were climbing the mountain in the previous video, Yudhishthir did not mourn when his brothers or Draupadi fell. He continued walking because he was detached from them.
After seeing them in hell suffering, he became attached to them and couldn't bear to see their suffering.
As per Shrimad Bhagvad gita , Arjun was performing Karm yoga and Shree Krishna told him that by doing this his all sins will be diminished and he will attain the ultimate liberation which is Krishna himself. There is no question of heaven or hell for Him because his soul was surrender to Shree Krishna.
You have not addressed the question at all.
Firstly in the Bhagavad Gita. First chapter. Eshwara says to Parvati. One who listens to Bhagavad Gita will not die. Shukdev heard Eshwara's narration of Bhagavad Gita.
Shukdev's father re affirms Eshwara's statement that if Shukdev has listened to Bhagavad Gita how can he die?
Secondly Arjunaa listened to Bhagavad Gita from krishna 2 times. 1st is during the war.
2nd is 3 months after the war as vyasa expresses humans forgetfulness.
So the revic question is
How did Arjunaa die inspite of listening to Bhagavad Gita?
and
Secondly Arjunaa surrendered to krishna completely. Why did he go to hell inspite of surrenderring to krishna?
Perhaps another video to address the missing parts. Thank you for watching :)
Pandav didn't die accidentally death or got killed in battlefield as what normal people die, thy have to return this material body to nature back before entering into heaven, Arjun listened bagvad Gita from lord thts why he attained moksha and merged into god but whoever born in this world he have to die ,even lord Krishna have to give up this body to nature back, even lord ram , why Arjun went to hell it's coz we have to pay our sins ,when lord ram hidely shoot arrow to Bali and he got killed ,same in Krishna avatar jara shoot an arrow to lord Krishna means even lord have to pay their karma ,Arjun was human so he have to pay his sins ,once their karma get empty thy can attain moksha, our good karma and bad karma are like chains which hold us not to attain moksha coz once we do good karma we have to enjoy the fruitful of good deeds and for bad karma we have to face sins ,so these r two obstacles , once a person get empty from their karmas by God grace and blessings he attain moksha, thank you
@@anoopkumar47 then why did Bhagavad Puran chapter 1 stated they don't?
Yes I am aware that Arjunaa comunioned with divine energy.
But it's clearly stated Arjun went to hell.
Aron Williams, you are asking logical questions. Krishna gave the verbal discourse to Arjun at the Mahabharatha war. Both Arjun and Krishna died without leaving any manuscript. After many centuries Bhagwat Geeta was first printed in the 15th century claiming to contain Krishna's word without any manuscript. LOL. Sri Ganesh was created by Shiva, who transplanted the head of a baby elephant over the beheaded body of his son is worshiped to remove life obstacles. The World's first transplant surgery was performed by Indian gods many centuries ago.
@@prosantomukerji3931Firstly Thankyou.
Let me correct a small line.
The one preserved in Indian Gurukul is mostly, Ugracheva's Mahabharata. Who was present in Janemejaya's snake sacrifice. Which was translated as it is by KM Ganguli in 1800's when Gurukul was about to be vanished from India.
Thirdly, the head transplant. He is reffered as Gana not Kunjara or Gaja. Gana is a head that looks similar to an elephant but not the actual elephant. Each Gana has a different form. Elephant resemblance is also a form. You can see the carving of Gana in western Indian temples, the gana that resembles elephant. In hampi, hoishala, elephanta caves. After the modern period ie., 14th century, people had no idea about gana, because that creature is not of earth. they looked at the carving and called it elephant face.
Thanks for telling the story I really felt like I was in my childhood 😃
Was it wrong on Yudhisthir's part that he was envious of the Kauravas being able to enter heaven? I think I had heard it somewhere...
Yudhistira's sin was that he lacked discrimination and gambled his wife away. Duryodhana had discrimination and knew he was not a professional gambler, so he employed his uncle Shakuni and also gave Yudhistira the same alternative of choosing a champion. He could have chose Krishna to represent him, but he mistakenly believed it was his duty to play the match himself despite not being that skilled. He even prayed Krishna would not find out, essentially binding him to not interfere in the match. What would have happened if Shakuni tried to cheat Krishna? Which way would the dice have rolled? Instead he relied on his own prowess and the lesson is reinstated when Draupadi is disrobed. First she thinks one of her other husbands will save her, then she relies on her own prowess, then when all other options fail she finally surrenders to Krishna and calls out for him where he stops her from being disrobed by creating an endless cloth. You can't gamble your wife away.
We enter heaven or hell as soul and not body as body is left on earth, then how come blood was oozing out?
i have several doubts, isn't the journey itelf a desire, like if they are on that path because they want to atain moksha/swarklok, which should be classified as a desire, moreover again when he saw Kauravas in sawaklok he felt jealousy and sence of disgust Ness, aint this feeling from materialist world? then again the desire to live with his trustees also an desire? i mean all desires should be eliminated good or bad, also when everything clears up, yam told a lie by bluffing Yudhistara, since youdhistara was punished for a similar lie, he was punished, so will yam be punished or not, if yes who will punish him. and what to do when the cycles continues in a feedback loop?
I loved ur narration.Very soulful . Wht beautiful history and epics India has to offer .
But gambling over the virtue and respect of ur wife, Is THE GREATEST SIN OF MANKIND..
Why is the narrator making the big "AA" sound at the end of many of the sanskrit words like "Yudhishtira", "Swargaloka", "Yama", etc.? It should be the smaller "A" sound. That just sounds wrong to me.
thanks
Transcend is the song that has been playing in every video
From what point should I start your videos. I am very must interested but confused
Why in English the ‘a’ sound is added? For e.g Yudhishtra instead if just Yudishtar?
Yudhishtra went to hell not because he told a white lie. Mahabharata is very clear that he says " Ashwathama hatha" loudly and adds " kunjarah" under his breath, meaning that Ashwathama the elephant is dead. So he did not lie, not even a white lie. But he went to hell because he did not trust God at that moment. He disobeyed Krishna who asked him to say only " Ashwathama hatha". For this disobedience and loss of faith in the actions of Krishna he goes to hell
Heaven and Hell! Do they exist in real or are illusions of our mind. Vyasa's Mahabharata narrates vital truths about life and death in the Swargarohanika parva, where both Kaurava and Pandava attain their respective positions according to their karma. Yudhisthira is furious to find Duryodhana seated on a grand throne adorned in al the luxuries of the Heaven, while he cannot find his friends, brothers and his devoted wife. The channel INDIAN MYTHOLOGY IN MODERNITY has made a two-episode series on this question, "Why Duryodhana Went To Heaven" which are worth watching to navigate through the mystery in a streamlined manner. The second episode ruclips.net/video/3TNR2yTN_ug/видео.html reveals a mysterious story of Kuruvansa which made this happen.
Interesting! Thank you for watching :)
Joyindrila Basu; Hindus believe in reincarnation without any evidence. Are you still worshiping vicious and imaginary Durga with eight hands riding a lion while murdering Mahishasura with a Trishul? Hinduism is rooted in Mythology, meaning mithya, Jhoot. Use your common sense and discard the legacy belief of the past. Facts lead to the truth, and the truth shall set you free. Satyemeva Jayete.
@@prosantomukerji3931 I find you very immature. You are questioning our age old scriptures. The souls of those days have seen far beyond reality. They were very pious. These days it is just science and technology. Our brain is not that smart as to judge and question our scriptures.
@@prosantomukerji3931 ur negative energy is hurting my brain , u should stop
Story is known to everyone... But please do some justice with good narration... Sadguru narration is so much powerful...
While we always strive to do our best, we're sorry this was not good enough for you.
Hopefully someday we will be able to deliver content that impresses your standards.
Thanks for prompt reply... I really like the way u expressed...what I felt is
1) Please go slow while narrating .. It felt is was fast like any other story.
2) Include pauses in between so that people can soak in emotions and perspective Spoken by the narrator
Jai Mahadev Jai Srimannarayana
But how its happens in nark and how they enjoy passer in Haven , as we know that spirt ( atma ) is untouched by anything like aagni, jl , and atma hai no sense , so how they experience all the things , i'm feeling confusing
God your videos are informative and soothing....but please fix the sound.....it feels like needles in the ears sometimes........please improve audio
JAY MAHA MAHA SABHI MAHA BHAGWAN 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Hii can you please make a video on moksha. I mean what is moksha in this life and how is it to be portrait
And who told you that they went to hell and heaven?
Is Hindu saga is available in hindi....
Do you know under which English Grammar rule Yudhisthir is called Yudhisthir"a"?
This is most probably a literal intepretation of Mahabharata. I dont think in reality any heaven(if at all there is something like that) would be comprised of worldly luxuries. THe idea that someone dying in in a battlefield automatically makes them qualify for a place in heave - or it pays of all their sinful debts is simply ridiculous.
Excellent narrative ❤ Chandam brajachand Manipur
Hence proved everywhere corruption exist .
Agreed
Please minimise the background music...
Background music is louder than your voice.
So well recited!
Thank you for your appreciation :)
I like this channel but one thing really irritates me… why you add ‘aa’ after each name? Udhistiraa, swarg lokaa, duryodhanaa…please speak names as we do in our language.. we don’t need to distort names when we speak English….
💯💯💯💯
Om vyasa draupadi mangalambika ati sundari raja kamalambikai swaha
The Pandavas and Kavravas both deserve Heaven because they only played out the drama directed by Krishna, as we all here are to play out our roles on earth🙏by divine logical
*@Nissim Patki* No, not at all. Kauravas never deserved heaven after what they have done. Only the Pandavas deserve Heaven because they only played out the DHARMA directed by Krishna, and Pandavas did not forcefully bet Draupadi in the game, it was an overconfidencial accident, and that's why Pandavas later apologized to Draupadi and lord Krishna. They asked for the forgiveness from lord Krishna unlike Karna and Kauravas who never said sorry to Draupadi for their wrong doings for at even once.
nah kauravas are like islam... anti dharma. they shouldnt be allowed nirvana or moksha or any of that!!
also odd arjuna suffered in hell cuz lord krishna promised him to free of sin if he obeyed him and became his devotee? so i guess arjuna wasn't truly committed to lord krishna. how sad.
True brotherly love. Such many Hindu stories promote the love of family!
1) How can someone go to hell when they have actually seen god?
2) Arjun was avatar of NARA, how could he go to hell?
3) Draupadi was a very loyal wife, their is no proof that Draupadi discriminated among her 5 husbands.
This all is a lie, this is not what is written in original texts, this is all fiction written by few stupid writers, who were not even scared of confusing people and spreading lies about a very pious text.
Edit:
4:28 how could their blood come out in Hell!? They were all dead and after death only our karma and our soul comes with us. Somebody please explain🙏🏼🙏🏼
Here I would like to clarify certain aspects of Duryodhana. In the video it is said Duryodhana gave cows and other sorts of wealth in charity. But please try to understand, whatever he did was never in good intentions. He never gave anything without expecting something in return from them which he could use for his sinister plans against Pandavas. The Durvasa muni incident is enough to prove this. He always thought that sadhus and santhas were weak people and good for nothing and that they could be manipulated. Please understand one thing which is clearly mentioned in Mahabharatha. All the 100 Kauravas were evil and burden on Earth. These Kauravas are not even in Hell. A Jiva can return to this world from hell or heaven. But these Kauravas are damned to a place called Andha Tamas - A very dark place of no return. They are still suffering there and are going to remain there till the end (Maha Pralaya) of this Kalpa(or creation). Now please re-think who went where.
Nice explanation 👍
How you know
@@whisperer4755 Its been narrated by various scholars in Mahabharata Tatparya Nirnaya (A treatise on Mahabharata)
Actually you’re wrong 😑 only heaven and hell exists man read the scriptures properly and don’t believe whatever modern-generation people are telling you…
@@whisperer4755 What else could be given as punishment to someone who wants to kill God and dharma. Okay let's forget the scriptures and what other scholars have to say. Isn't there limitations to the punishments that can be given to a soul in hell or joys that can be given to the soul in heaven. If there are limitations, then definitely there must a place much dark and sinister for souls that are pure evil. These are realms or lokas just like our Earth (bhuloka) but here we exist as spirits and not as a body of five elements. Both happiness and suffering are there on Earth too. But only thing is here we have a body , there it's only spirit that suffers. See if you are born or Earth you live and die one day and return to the same Earth (if you believe in rebirth). But there are realms wherein if the soul goes.. it's trapped for the rest of creation.. cannot take part in the process of births and deaths.. this is just my opinion..
Reading the comments, I just realised how most people don't realise how Mahabharat in a reality was an elaborate play by the Supreme where not only Gods but Rakshashas, Asuras, Yakshas and many other creatures did participate. While for the Gods, this participation was their duty, their Dharma to uphold the virtue of the Earth, for most other creatures this participation implied the antonment for their past sins. Hence, when the Kauravas and the kings fighting for Dhritarashtra's sons die in the battle of Kurukshetra, their deaths cleans them of their sins. Dharma isn't mere right or wrong, Dharma is the law that holds the entire creation and thus, everyone has a Dharma which when followed acts as their bearer. However,Dharma is extremely subtle, and one is required to identify it's subtleties.
Many of the commenters, are not fond of Yudisthira's gambling but nowhere in the epic did anyone glorify it, even Yudhisthira himself blamed the gambling for their misery. However, one needs to realise, we as third persons knew what was going on beforehand, even the depths of the malign hearts ot Kauravas and Dhritarashtra. The Pandavas had no idea of knowing what was wrong. For them it was a mere game at the earnest of their uncle and cousins, and anyways, "Dyuta" wasn't an uncommon game during that era and for the Pandavas to reject the proposal they needed a strong ground, else, the Kshatriya clan would hold themselves in a mere position of laughables. And when the game reached to its climax Yudisthira had already lost almost everything, to the extent he was trying to hold on to anything that would give him back everything. Just one dice and everything is yours, is an extremely titillating concept. And thus the game turns into addiction and thus the inevitable arises. Its not out of the blue but a properly paved way to self destruction.
I always saw The Mahabharat as a story of a dynasty, of it's people and their failings and how they either overcome their failings or succumb to it. And unlike our modern stories, each person's actions has consequences on the greater universe while the person themself is ultimately very small and insignificant to the greater universe. This is a story where actions have more significance than your name or material wealth.
@@MahiMahi-yu5jo it is the story of a dynasty if you look at it from a superficial level, but it's mostly because it's the story of two ages colliding told from the viewpoint of a royal house that has been on earth in centuries. There are multiple sub plots and immense intricacies that go on, throughout.
26-03-2022 Bangalore
Very interesting truth. Even Dharmaraya had to stay in hell for some time before
going to heaven. He is not devoid of sin.
My doubt: Attachment to brothers made Dharmaraya visit hell for some time?
Or telling lie to Bhimsha made Dharmaraya visit hell for some time
before going to heaven? Which is correct? Kindly clarify. -Nagaraj T V
Every person after death will have to go both Heaven and Hell. How much time you have have to spent in Hell and Heaven depends on how much karma(good & bad) you have left. If you are doing good things and are also enjoying corresponding results then the time you have to spend in heaven will decrease, and when you do bad things and avoid getting punished by law, you have to spend more time in hell. So, try to get results of actions just here on earth. And also try to not break any promises, as they will carry to next life.
JAI SHRI RAM!