The Real Reason Sierra Space Is About To Take Over
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- Sign up for the weekly Space Race newsletter here: www.thespacera...
Last Video: The US Military's Secret Space Weapon
• The US Military's Secr...
►Sign up for the weekly Space Race newsletter here: www.thespacera...
►Become a member today: / @thespaceraceyt
►Support the channel by purchasing from our merch store: shop.theteslas...
► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
► Patreon: / thespacerace
► X/Twitter: / thespaceraceyt
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Tesla Space: / theteslaspace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslasp...
Business Email: sean@creatormill.com
#Spacex #Space #Mars
![[DOKKAN BATTLE] Worldwide Campaign Announcement Video Part 2!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JpT5Voak6WA/mqdefault.jpg)
Modern journalist checking their work or using critical thinking skills..... ya right.
No. They do so. They just intentionally spread misinformation.
Buying ULA? Do people realize how much SLS is actually worth? 2 or 3 billion? LOL, SLS itself has several rockets in building worth 10s of billions.
This post is completely ignore food. It make ZERO sense. Sierra is trying to make a ball that makes a part of a station in space which absolute 0 people would ever want to be in.
Other than that, they have a single Space place that hasn't done a single thing yet.
God, I can't believe I clicked on this silliness.
@@Donald_Turnip ULA does not manufacture the SLS. Boeing manufactures ONE, admittedly very big, very essential, PART of SLS. ULA manufactures Vulcan, and owns a stockpile of Atlas V launchers, just as the narrator said.
@@Donald_Turnip Why would you not want to be in it? Inflatables use a material 4x stronger than Kevlar, it's better at putting up with imapcts than the ISS modules.
It's harder to setup, but otherwise it makes sense as a way to expand volume of a station quickly.
@@i-love-space390 Partly true, ULA manufactuers the current upperstage for SLS, they do not make the EUS, which is the upperstage for the Block 1B version.
Sierra might be another name but if the investor is the same, expect the same output
I'm not sure what you're saying, but to be clear, Jeff Bezos does *not* own Sierra Space. Sierra is an excellent company and a merger with ULA would be good for both parties.
@@antibrevitySierra Space surely can use their own launch system. ULA had been less than positive about getting Dream Chaser a ride on e it is cleared. I still would be apprehensive about how good the supply of BE-4 will be to keep the Valcan flying. That has been a hold up for the Valcan flying schedule this far.
No, they don't have the same investor. So far, SNC and Sierra Space have good industry track.
Another thing to have in mind is that Boeing went bad after the merger with McDonnell Douglas.
@@antibrevity ULA IS JUNK. Holy crap! How can you be so clueless.
Anyone that takes "CNBS" seriously has a distorted vision of reality!
It is not a bug, it is a feature...This is why they existe....
i mean thats pretty much all news besides like Reuters
It's not CNBS. It's CNBC.
@@antibrevity BS
@@antibrevity It's "CNBS"... when Joy Reid, Rachel Maddow, Joe Scarborough and the likes of Mika Brzezinski are the main source of information coming from that organization.
They haven't been a "news organization" for decades!
Sounds like CNBC is working for Blue Origin.
What another conspiracy theory??
Just face it. The bias of most legitimate news agencies is toward hysteria, not a "liberal agenda" or bribery. Emotional, sensational stories that provoke discord are what drive eyes. All this goes all the way back to the yellow journalism at the turn of the twentieth century. And unfortunately, the frenetic pace of content creating and the 24 hour news cycle is creating a lot of crap that passes for news. As the narrator said, one page of the report clearly had the wrong value, and it was at the beginning of the report, so some reporter jumped on it as a story, trying to be first. If anyone has a definite agenda, it is Faux News. They are not just hysterical, they are consistent in their bias.
While FOX is working for Trump and Putin!!
One correction: there are 3 human rated American rockets. You’re forgetting SLS.
Doesn't it have to fly once with crew before it is human-rated? Like Boeing Starliner now? Maybe not. The 1st flight was the test.
@@garylcamp Human Rated has solid defined meanings in terms of redundancy and risk tolerance. Also the system has studies and risk analysis done. Rockets are human rated well before people ride them. SLS was both built to carry humans from the start and has flown a demo mission to validate the system.
The super leaky system?
This is the first coherent treatment of both these news items I saw in the deluge of SpaceX-centric YT channels. Actual facts, and very reasonable interpretation. Well done!
I can think of no reason why SpaceX would deliberately use mercury in a deluge system, or would it be a by-product of booster fuel combustion. Thus it is likely the reported value from SpaceX was likely a typo, and the CNBC reporter and editorial process was too quick to pull the trigger.
So, assuming that SpaceX got the report wrong... you/Musk blame the reporter for reporting what SpaceX told them?
this story smells to high heaven ... but he made his fake splash , got his clicks and eyeballs on the neverending ads on their website .. im sorry but they have forced me to vote trump
Mercury might come form different places, the tubing used, the residue from evaporation might get concentrated, the flames in contact with the structure might liberate particulates... I surely don't know what SpaceX use as materials
@@jeffreycutler7364
Stop intentionally spreading misinformation. There was a single missed period in a report where every place else was correct. Don't act like you never mistype or that it wasn't an obvious mistype.
@@BBBrasil It didn't though. The mercury content of the water perfectly matches the city water they get it from. They don't add anything into it.
Comment to Sierra, get engineers and start building a rocket like the Falcon, reusable!
But, use SpaceX to get Dream Chaser in orbit, NOW!
We need a transporter to the ISS for crew missions.
I'm sure they'll read this comment! Send a letter dawg
Thanks
Obviously space x won’t let them use their rocket considering spacex would want people to only use their dragon capsule etc
Orbit is hard. BO is the very proof of that. They did several launches to 100 Km range, but no further.
@@harry258 Actually they would let them use falcon, its good revenue. Also Sierra might do different things dragon might not be able top do like moving the iss in orbit.
Absolutely no way Sierra would do this. All this would do is put Sierra about 15 years behind SpaceX. The main issue Sierra is having is retaining engineering staff. SpaceX and Blue Origin have poached about 1/3 of ULA engineers. With this news you would see the departure of any young or experienced engineers worth their salt. There is no way financially this would benefit Sierra. What, spend billions to launch 1 time? They need to engineer a reusable rocket. The remaining stock of rockets ULA has are set aside for the Government. With the Government being their main customer this entire exercise is just good business.
As for the SpaceX story, CNCB lied and will continue to lie as the current regime pressures them. The government and the media are out to take down Elon so they can take over the entire SpaceX and StarLink system as a complete surveillance system.
They would be better off contracting with SpaceX for Falcon 9. But keep in mind, if Dream Chaser is ever manned, it will NOT be inside a fairing on ascent. In order to have a credible abort scenario, it has to fly naked in the slipstream during launch. And like the Space Shuttle, that puts a lot of asymmetrical forces on the booster. As I have said in the past, if they get a man-rated Dream Chaser certified in less than 5 years, they will have really achieved something.
Sierra and ULA are a decade behind SpaceX. I hope they succeed because competition breeds innovation but they aren’t about to take over.
CNBC and old media dislikes Musk
"Old media" lol. Old media has been superficially praising him for the most part.
Reasonable human beings dislike thugs and demagogues, who woulda thunk?
@@georgeshapiro301
Wow. You are completely insane if you haven't noticed old media constantly hating on the guy.
@@MrNote-lz7lh Is it ironic for someone actually trying to defend Trump by saying everyone else is crazy and in a conspiracy and corrupt or is it a compliment?
People expect “journalists” to do journalism? Cute.
Thanks for the in depth reporting
7:29: mg = milligrams, NOT micrograms.
Glad someone else noticed.
Good good Sierra space my favorite space company.
The value of ULA is the order book. All those government contracts. Blue Origin is hoping to get ULA for a lower price but they will be the eventual buyer.
ULA is old technology, the new technology have no need to buy them or for the order book, the reusable will be cheaper over time and win.
@@sokolum If they manage to put anything in orbit, you mean. I truly hope they will, I don't want SpaceX to become a monopoly, but we still have to see Bezos' Amazon managerial skills at work in BO. The only thing they launched so far is law suits.
Dude; your channel is awesome. I’d love to see you design a logo commensurate with the depth and polish you create.
There is an error in your video at 7:29. You showed 2.1mg (milligram) instead of 2.1μg (microgram).
CNBC lies
Another example of rubbish journalism to bash SpaceX for clicks
Better than bootlicking spaceX
@@DramaticBatu Stop criticizing our lord and right wing populist Musk !!!!1!!111!!
Does this company have a nut job at the helm? Didn't think so. 😂
@@Gurumeierhansno
@@DramaticBatuWe found the Elon Musk hater 🤣🤣
There is little to gain from Sierra acquiring ULA as they no longer represent competent rocket makers.
Serra gets to have its own launcher instead of depending on others. Plus they can develop other rockets. Boeing and Northrop already payed for the rnd on this one. On top of that torri is a smart guy. Untie his hands and spacex might just have a real competition.
@@brianknow9142 You mean Boeing and Lockheed.
@@dwpetrak your are correct.
@@brianknow9142 Launcher? A couple tanks with no engine.
@kennethwers I was more thinking about all the ground equipment and ready to use pads. Plus, there are a few government contracts that come with owning ULA
The issue is the load capacity of Dream Chaser versus that of Starship. While dream chaser is reusable the boost systems at ULA are not so, if SpaceX gets Starship to work then economics of a disposable system will be problematic.
Your premise is that Sierra Space should spend $2-3B (go into debt) to buy a failing ULA. That's like investing in the Titanic. Bezos passed on it, which means Sierra is unwisely spending more than Bezos offered. That should have been their first clue. ULA is an Albatross. Yes, they have several Space Force missions on the books for Vulcan to launch, but that won't save the company. 40% of their engineers have left for SpaceX and Blue Origin. Their newest rocket isn't reusable; it's an expendable launch vehicle making it the most expensive to operate compared to Falcon 9, Falcon Heave, and New Glenn. Sierra better look a few months in the future. Blue Origin will launch New Glenn. SpaceX will work out Starship. Both are far more capable than Vulcan and cheaper to operate. ULA is headed to bankruptcy. Let Boeing and Lockheed suck that up. Sierra Space needs to run from this as fast as they can.
Blue origin might want them for the Launch pads. They need certian launch pad capabilities in order to keep Air / Space Force contracts, and arguably, buying ULA is the quickest route to that.
Sierra is comitted to flying all of the DC-100 launches on Vulcan, having them as a customer wouldn't hurt BO either. It'd probably give them more elverage in their joint Station program.
Yeah, don't hold your breath. SpaceX enuf said.
If Starship is a guide those Dreamchaser Sierra ships wings will blaze like fireworks on New Years Day.
Good luck you will need it.
Hmm, those wings are in the leeward, the same is true for the new Starship, SpaceX also moved its wings leeward to avoid or minimize the effect you might have referred to.
In conclusion : municipal's water contains high level of mercury !?
Every time I hear "Blue Origin" I always default to thinking of it as "Blue Cosmos" from Gundam SEED.
The possibility that Sierra Nevada purchase ULA would be a good merger beneficial to both companies and a boost for Dream Chaser and for Space advancement !!!
How are you going to get a show going when you cant get the ships correct; time stamp 4:53
To quote CNBC has enough credibility, it would be like using sources from the RUclips comment section.
When Dreamchaser performs a successful manned orbital flight and safe return, then we can talk, until then...blah, blah, blah.
When 100% on one single ship launched in space... they were on Mars. Because we would have soon had enough.
CNBC should lose their license to lie
So a reusable spacecraft launched on a disposable rocket.
Fantastic Way to end the video
not the bots :/
Imagine if the moon we see in the sky each phase were the reflection of the outer-most magnetic plates in ‘Negative-Push/Pull’ momentum within Earth; also being the darkest, and beginnings of the slower spectrums of the ‘cooling-down’ phases of the moon, still visible enough to be seen at night.
(First imagine that the earth is an invisible sphere of liquid light, and all existing life lives on the inside of Earth, harmoniously as possible based on the given Positive-vs.-Negative Push/Pull momentum at natural light speed.
Could this be a reflection from an existing core within Earth? Perhaps while such a core inside of the earth burns infinitely hot, it also burns at indefinite speed and time, reflecting the ‘infernal time’ (otherwise backwards in darkness), while in harmony with natural light-travel, present-forwards.
SpaceX is not using water from Austin at their launchpad in Brownsville. Austin is 300+ miles away. 9:02
Your reporting is irresponsible
Ula has Cloward and Pevon perspective that's probably why the are selling it.
Wasn't Sierra Space in financial trouble last year? Where did the massive funds to buy ULA come from?
If ULA is sold for anything over $1 mil 2 bankrupt Sierra. Better to arrange a JV with SpaceX.
ULA is loosing too much money
Seria will go bankrupt before it could bring everything on line. Even if they aquired ULA for free, the current monthly liabilities would drain them of all funds.
Sierra Space could be operating ULA at a significantly smaller loss than ULA itself can right now. Just a perspective. 🤙
ULA is old technology, makes no sense to buy them.
Old technology without engines.
@@kennethwersno it's not very compelling is it!?
ULA and SNC merger seems like a no-brainer. We need another big player in the game.
If its so good then why they selling it??
Sell when it's bad and buy when it's good. The key to success!
is this ula rocket still a 1 time use rocket? If so it should be outlawed. We have people complaining about wastewater when we are taking huge rockets and burning them up in our atmosphere. This rocket is like a car built in the 70s with a new fuel injection system.
Sierra buying ULA is awesome. Much better than BO.
Micro grams is abbreviated “ug”, not “mg” which is milligrams. Thank you.
Yes, but ULA can't land the launch vehicle.
[7:48] Typo ??? Decimal error ??? How could you possibly miss the column headings ? They clearly label the columns as two different samples of which many show differing results of over three orders of magnitude. Are you deliberately spreading false information or just egregiously sloppy?
Why are you not questioning these "results"? Those metals and contaminants do not arise from the combustion of methane and oxygen but must come from the water itself. So where does the water for the deluge system come from and why didn't you research/answer such a basic question instead of regurgitating a questionable source?
I had you marked as an OK channel but am now reconsidering.
Stop intentionally spreading misinformation. There was a single missed period in a report where every place else was correct. Don't act like you never mistype or that it wasn't an obvious mistype.
@@MrNote-lz7lh Sorry but you need to go back to reading 101. It was not one decimal place or typo. Half of the readings shown from the two samples differ by three and four orders of magnitude. (FYI, That's 1000 and 10,000 times as you probably didn't do well in math either.)
My question is where did the mecury come from if real
They only use water from the Austin Municipal Water Plant?!?!?!
It is "will", NOT "2"!
nice
Why? Why buy something that is only going to cost you billions (STRAP YOU DOWN) and needs some serious reorganization (MORE MONEY), when you could link up with SpaceX, a company ready to provide a launch platform on a per launch cost basis? And they better be sure those AtlasV rockets are NOT contractually and legally guaranteed elsewhere regardless if ULA changes ownership.
Sierra Space is going to be huge if they can stick to their pacing. Do you want to be the shipping company or have the shipping company and every home builder in the world? Get ready because they might dwarf SpaceX.,
Where would that amount of mercury come from ?
The actual investor is DoD.
Theory - the original OLM is being made obsolete by the new ones. We know Space X iterates everything, so that's not a surprise. What if on the next flight, they think there's a decent chance the booster catch isn't going to go perfectly and OLM #1 may not survive. Problem eliminated.
If there was actually a good reason to get rid of pad A before pad B came online, then they'd just demolish it normally instead of purposefully causing a major incident.
I wish spacex will win the space race 2
Reporters, News and Investigative Journalism are not what they used to be.
CNBC printed blatant lies.
CNBC? Yeah right.
CNBC? LMFAO
10:30 - Very mature.
A helluva lot of 'if's'.
Elon should talk to the Chinese, which would alarm the FAA and the Military Industrial Complex.
… and probably get him arrested on espionage charges 🤣
CNBC SUX… Love it…
The first problem is you still think main stream news media is real.
They won't be tsking over anything anytime soon. Cant touch SpaceX launch cadence. Even with ULA. Be good for sierra though. they have the toys, they just need the vehicle. 👍
ULA launches are pricey. SpaceX launches are a number of times cheaper per launch. It would be better just to use Spacex Launchers.
0:59 Come back to
Boeing🤦🏼♂️ I knew something would go wrong for those two astronauts a couple of weeks before the launch I mean come on they can't even keep their aircraft together in the sky SMH.
The level of bias toward Spacex in this channel is so ridiculous. I'm as much of a fan as the next guy, but at least try to make the glazing a bit less obvious.
its almost as if they are paying you guys
I’ve suspected this channel to be a deep anti-Musk sleeper cell for quite awhile now. What I’m not certain of is who’s behind it.
@@OBVictor
No. We just aren't stupid unlike you. SpaceX is, objectively, racing circles around the rest of the world's space agencies combined. What isn't to praise in that regard?
Methane may contain trace amouts of mercury.
Neither rp1 or methane contain mercury.
I worked for SNC several years ago, and it was the best job I ever had in my career. Unfortunately, back then, OBama got re-elected and cut budget by trillions of USD, and all “green field” technology projects were cancel’d at that time, and 90% of the contractors at my location were promptly, and understandibly, let go. I miss working at SNC. It truly is one of those companies anyone should want to work for, even for their career’s duration.
Yep more BS.
My guess is SpaceX and Tesla are gonna have more and more "typos" as Musk becomes more red pilled.
That's because you are an idiot.
PLANE!!!!!!!
"Starship" I'd expect as much from Leon.
Ula sounds like the dumbest rocket you could buy. It was top of the line 30 years ago
CNBC is woke.
Are... "certain people" really using "woke" as some sort of general insult now lol?
@@georgeshapiro301
Well it isn't really general. The term woke is used correctly here. To mean intentionally spreading falsehoods to push a narrative in order to attack someone on the right.
@@MrNote-lz7lh You need to touch grass
Most of this video was excellent, so good! And it was good enough that I subscribed. But then I was really turned off towards the end, somehow went from why Sierra is about to take over to why SpaceX is great and probably not liable for any issues in TX. But again, I'm a new subscriber so maybe this comes through in all videos?? Is The Space Race channel somehow in-bed with Elon?
Using or acquiring ULA makes no sense. There is already a company with multiple launch options that is far cheaper than ULA.
Where is SierraSpace going to get $3B to make the purchase? Yes, might be good match but a little pricey.
Wouldn't SierraSpace have to honor agreements already made for Atlas 5 usage? Not sure they could cancel contracts outright.
CNBC has missed on almost all its space reporting (oh, say like StarLiner).
...and only in media is an accusation equivalent with reality....and that does not mean SpaceX is 'drowned in deluge of bad news"
No one would seriously buy ULA at this point, they are working with a new rocket which uses old technology and won't have a hope of competing against the new players in the launch market like SpaceX, Rocket Lab etc. They have defence contracts for now but how long they can keep those contracts is anyone's guess.
Try buying motors from SpaceX? Save headaches!
CNBC does indeed suck, but that's probably a personal matter. 🤣🤣
Man sierra space has been around for 20 years and have launched nothing, they aren’t gonna take over let’s be honest
Andddd aren't you a fool for trying to level shade on to SpaceX. The number from CNBC is in fact incorrect. The alternative fictional amount is so high that it's unthinkable. They would have to be physically seeding straight mercury out of the end of Starship.
But at the end of the day, we have two things happening in a Starship. One, it burns oxygen. Two, it burns methane. Neither of these things creates methane.
Shame on you for making it seem like SpaceX has a problem.
Sierra Space has a small experimental vehicle that will not be what you think it is.
Jeff who?
If SPACEX trunks don’t burn up then Sierra Space’s last/ first section engine definitely won’t burn up due to the solid structure of engine parts. No way. How could CNBC come up with a report on the same day the rocket was launched that day. No one was allowed near the launch 🚀 site immediately. So one has to say Bullshit.
Yeah right.
ULA was a biproduct of the "peace dividend" after the USSR imploded. America rightly did not want to lose our manufacturing base for launch vehicles and one of those two competing companies was on the verge of getting out of the launch business. And since the remaining company could not launch all of the payloads that the AF needed, they had to keep the rocket (Delta 4 Heavy) available to launch spy satellites by merging the two companies. You would have had a LESS CAPABLE monopoly anyway, once Boeing exited the launch business. As usual, you twenty somethings are just as likely to believe simplistic and WRONG ideas as old farts of the MAGA. Things aren't all just corrupt decisions like in the movies, with villains doing selfish things that anyone can see are wrong. Decisions are always pragmatic, and political, and involve competing needs and political limitations. The country simply could not support 2 space companies at the time. 2024 is simply a different world than 2004. And no one foresaw SpaceX back then, and it took more than a decade for SpaceX to become the company that could launch defense payloads like ULA.
As for Vulcan, to use it for manned launches, it would have to be man-rated. Atlas V had to change the upper stage configuration and flight profile to allow a manned launch with all appropriate abort modes. I am sure Vulcan would need to undergo similar tweaks and testing.
At present Dream Chaser is a cargo vehicle. It took SpaceX approximately 7 years to go from a cargo version of Dragon to a redesigned and certified Crew Dragon capsule. Hopefully, Dream Chaser would be quicker in that process, but some things take time, no matter how much money is available to be thrown at a problem. 10 people cannot develop something 10 times quicker. There is a law of diminishing returns. And problems have to ironed out. NASA now has EXTREMELY STRINGENT specs for manned certification born of 3 major disasters in their history. That is the real reason SpaceX will be bringing home the Boeing Starliner crew. 90 % safety is not good enough. They knew if they signed off on Starliner to return crew, and something happened, they would be crucified and funds cut. As it is, I expect Starliner to make its way home unmanned with little drama.
CNBC (Commercials, Nothing But Commercials) does seem to have a strong anti-Elon bias. This predates the recent Elon-haters piling on the Musk hate-train, and likely is related to who's providing CNBC with dark money out of sight.
Didn’t you look into your information? There was a typo in the paper
The only thing that things is going to take over is garbage day duty. even at that think that will be too much for that junk of a spaceship
"Misunderstanding". Yeah, right...