The Real Reason SpaceX Developed The Falcon 9!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 янв 2024
- The Real Reason SpaceX Developed The Falcon 9!
Last Video: How SpaceX Will Land On Mars
• How SpaceX Will Land O...
►Become a member today: / @thespaceraceyt
►Support the channel by purchasing from our merch store: shop.theteslaspace.com/
► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
► Patreon: / theteslaspace
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: / theteslaspace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
Business Email: sean@creatormill.com
#Spacex #Space #Mars 
Наука
What topics would you like to see us cover next? Let us know below!
Why Starship changed over the years
PEREGRINE 1
The future of the falcon 9
What those 4 things are that stick up on all 4 sides of every launch of anything at Canaveral.
How about why you have @ssholes running your discord?
What an incredible company SpaeX is. They reshaped the space industry so much over the past decades.
SpaceX is setting the standard for work performance and productivity globally!
I wonder what the company is worth now. 🚀
Somewhat. I'm surprised the legacy rocket companies aren't trying harder to produce similar reusable designs to the Falcon 9R.
(ツ) ☕☕(ツ)
@@jokerace8227that’s what Chinese companies are doing I also think Russia is building a reusable rocket and blue origin is also building a reusable rocket but the legacy space industry hasn’t stepped up and they will lose
Decades?
@@vincep1c156decade=10yrs, space x been around for 20 sum years now
Love these history lessons! Thank you for this in depth overview of the Falcon 9.
Thanks for carring about all.
governance overdose then, affordable or not its not really their decision is it, but then they're not supposed to be allowed to make laws themselves either , and so here we are
When considering the ambitious goals that SpaceX is still pursuing, it is easy to overlook the immense achievements they have accomplished in the past few years!
Thanks for another great video!
We are doing everything humanly possible to shut down this planet the irony.
@@BjayawesomeBlackDudewhat? Sorry I don’t understand what you mean
@@ObamanableSnowman Wars but maybe not Taiwan this year.
Elon Musk and SpaceX has reinvigorated my child like fascination with spaceflight
We just need some sick space missions or even landers. I am sure Elon wouldn't mind spending a few billion to get some rock samples or a decent few images of the out solar system.
@@trojanhorse6029Wee need to get as many landers with rovers onto the moons in the outer solar system
Same. The moment i saw a recommended 1 month old clip of falcon heavy landing the 2 boosters side by side my jaw dropped and i just couldn't stop watching space related content, especially rockets development and launches.
JWST, Hubble, Voyager 1 and 2 are reinvigorating imaginations of young and old. Musk had nothing to do with those.
I hope Jeff and Blue Origin can get it up (into orbit). My popcorn for the the next starship launch is ready.
Thanks for the history lesson. I didn’t follow them until I saw a video of two boosters landing side by side. Amazing! I enjoy your videos very much
@@elonmuskceospaceX I am now in Oregon, but originally I came from Delaware ( south of Philadelphia).
@@markhollingsworth3262 welcome to the west coast
Another very well done video! Really like the channel. Keep up the good work!
The entire concept that somehow moving humanity to mars was going to be EASIER than fixing the problems on earth is just insane. completely insane.
Because it makes a cooler story. 😆
Incredible episode! You rock.
Thank you for sharing this
Excellent history lesson! The best I've seen from the ten sites I follow. A bit early perhaps but a Falcon Heavy history would be welcome.
Really nice and thank you nice to see and appreciate all there work
Thank you for supporting us and becoming a member! We really appreciate the help
Don't worry, I'll be right behind you all the way rooting you on.
Really great presentations. Thank You!🙏
It was and still is crazy to think that SpaceX was able to land a rocket. It was a game changer in launching things into space. Even more amazing is that they continue to improve the design rather than remain stagnant with a working reusable rocket.
Very true and still amazing at every flight 😊
Amazing video dude. xx
Love the channel. I would love to see an in depth update on ULA's successful launch of it's new Vulcan rocket. Too bad about the lunar lander, would like to see an update on that as well. Keep up the great content!
Thanks for the historical review.
Fascinating indeed!
NASA experimented with the idea of reusable rockets decades ago, but they were never successful in landing the rockets. I believe that the US space program had devolved so much that until SpaceX came along, we were resorting to the use of Russian rockets for many/most of our launches. Great video!
B1058 has my signature on a grid fin following a successful landing sequence burn test I collaborated in.🎉
Space x is amazing!
Great vid, thanks for all the great info!
This is very interesting and infinitely exciting ! 😮❤
Beste Grüße aus Deutschland und danke für die News! ;-)
Excellent information. "countless setbacks". More like a handful, all of which were overcome very quickly by the SpaceX engineers and technicians on the way to Falcon 9 Block 5, the SpaceX launch vehicle masterpiece. Falcon 9 met and won two of the most important challenges for the SpaceX Mars enterprise: Supersonic retropropulsion and vertical landing of an orbital class launch vehicle, i.e. the F9 booster. Those milestones were accomplished over eight years ago (22Dec2015).
They've learned a lot more from their failures than anyone else has from not even attempting things in the first place.
Awesome Video 😊
Well done.
Great video...👍
Great initiative, great invention. Cheers
Keep it going,out standing,keep us informed.
The excitement of growth in this country,what ,
What progress we've have made🎉
This is sooo awesome 👍
I follow alot about SpaceX and you still provided lots of new cool information about their changes of the Falcon 9. Thanks
where/what do you use to stay up to date with this info
“What about it” he’s really into it
So far so good. I walk around listening.
Thanks for the update. How do you secure the payloads &. Satolites?
Awesome video. Thanks for sharing this. Space X really is an incredible company.
Great innovative, great technology
The photo at 0:31 is not SpaceX, this looks like Stoke Space to me.
You are correct
What a strange oversight by the channel
Its amazing and fantastic what the will to succeed can invent!! Would love if any developments being explored along the lines of Silent Running.
Very very informative
Wonderful history lesson !!!
Really interesting and informative video but, at 8:36, are you sure that's a reentry burn? Looks like all 9 engines running and plume expansion shortly before MECO. Boost back and reentry use three engines, don't they?
You’re probably right. The graphics on this video are not 100% accurate
Love It!!!
i messed with this in kerbal. adding parachutes and other recovery systems adds weight and reduces delta v meaning the rocket wont go as far and it can be drastic and also more expensive. the most efficient thing to do is strip it all down bare then do a little burn close to the surface.. youll have more fuel to do it because you saved it by cutting weight. adding a couple parachutes could be the difference of not having the fuel you otherwise would have had.
Thanks!
Nice!
Geniale,e sono convinta che riuscira ,in quello che sie foccussatto, Mille Auguri🎉🌌
Good job
THEY can’t trivialize the brilliant pursuit of ‘economical’ space access. Kudos SpaceX!
This is an historically important tutorial!
Correction, turbopump micro-cracks would actually happen on the test stand. It wasn't the flight that caused the cracks.
Awesome! Thank you to Elon and all the SpaceX team.
Great story!
Awesome
Cool story!😊
Go elan! All reasons were as I would hope them to be.
Like 60 years ago
.
Impressive. I mean both SpaceX and your content
The jellyfish effect is from a boost back burn. The 1st and 2nd stages are pointing at each other causing the exhaust to interact.
John Carmack and Armadillo helped to pioneer computer controlled vertical landings
Thanks
Third reason why parachutes wouldn’t work with the F9 compared to the Space Shuttle’s SRB’s: the SRB’s didn’t have complex engines but just nozzles from the solid rocket fuel. Hence, these type of engines could much better deal with salty ocean water…
I love everything you just did about the analyzation of how it works.. maybe instead of dumping my ashes into the sea maybe I'll eject them into space I mean how much does 1 lb of ashes cost to dump into space
Henry Ford would be proud... can't wait for the windshield wipers!
Great 🎉
Thanks frrom Brazil
So ozone hole insurance survival plan is ?
SOOOO INTERESTING!!!!!!
❤this is sooo awesome !? 💥💕❤️💕❤️💕❤️💕❤️
0:30 Falcon 9 did not launch 96 times in 2023. Falcon 9 launched 91 times and Falcon Heavy launched 5 times.
Falcon heavy's are 3 Falcon 9 engines strapped together. But yes, technically Falcon heavy's were launched 5 times. Still tho, 91 times for Falcon 9 and 5 Falcon Heavy's is an insane number of launches
@@snakevenom4954 I wonder what they are doing with all these launches. We all know going to mars aint it
@@donpage2161 Falcon 9 launches are for sattellites and getting equipment and resources to the space station
@@donpage2161SpaceX to Mars was a PR campaign to get federal funding for Musk to build rockets to launch and maintain Star Link. Everything else is just freight hauling to the Space Station. I don’t think Musk was ever serious about going to Mars. Don’t hear him talking about it anymore do you? No. The radioactive atmosphere and the cancer causing dust everywhere on Mars make it a fools errand.
👍🚀👍🚀👍
Slight correction of the landing process.
In the final burn for landing, its not "the engines", last burn is the single central engine.
And its a single engine, because even at minimum thrust, its still too high to hover.
Why can’t the landing legs also be made of Titanium and shaped as additional Grid Fins? Wouldn’t this help slow and stabilize the Rockets reentry if extended at start of reentry?
That would be expensive to an ungodly degree, not to mention that the design of the legs would have to be quite different
I honestly think space x should expand on the Alcubuars warp drive system as well as this.
Great great great video. Thank you...
Nice video. So much so that for Artemis I would have opted for Falcon heavy, maybe two launches with one earth orbit rendezvous and then a lunar (or gateway) one. Much more solid and viable than 15 launches. Moreover mars I am convinced will require nuclear cruise, not just CH4. Just my opinions, I think spacex people are great, but I feel confused about that. SLS doesn’t deserve a word!
Amazing story, Elon really took something though impossible and made it possible. Thank Elon
The engineers and builders at SpaceX are all amazing folks, and also deserve a lot of credit for getting the Falcon 9R to work so reliably.
(ツ) ☕☕(ツ)
Just to be clear, he bought a stake in SpaceX. He has not been involved in decision making, just press statements. Don't lick his boots too hard.
@@jokerace8227 Your total right, it would have never been done without the people from SpaceX, there blood, sweat, and tears have made the impossible, and for that, there work will never be forgotten.
Freer minds and competition has resulted in the most reliable, reusable and cargo efficient rocket-ship on the planet.
Please show me more,but I can't request. Very interested Thanks
❤😂🎉
I thought the jellyfish was the last part of the flight up, when the air is so thin and ends at MECO. THEN the flip & back-burn.
Wish I could go
At 0.31 that was the proud folks at Spoke Space.
Thanks very much for this nice overview. The question is not whether using falcon 9 is cheaper than the space shuttle, which was notoriously expensive, but rather how well it compares to older NASA (or even Russian) single use rockets. Can you comment on that?
As far as I know one order of magnitude less
🤔😲 Amazing to me that Musk was able to further the rocket diversion from the EMF propulsion used by Space Force at this time...
IMPRESSIVE🙏❤️🔥❣️INDEED❣️🙏❤️🔥
@12:00 NASA had already landed a verticle rocket landing. It was not thought impossible.
The heat shield comment appears erroneous. The first burn of the stage 1 on reentry bleeds of speed to about Mach 8. This is at about 60k altitude. Then it reduces its speed to about Mach 3. It is a combination of speed and atmospheric density that causes the serious re-entry heat. So if you re-enter at a slow enough speed it is possible to avoid reentry burnout. The maths are also that after the top stage is lost and the most of the fuel spent, the total mass needed to deaccelerate is a lot less.
A good book on how to frugally colonize our solar system is Second Exodus Colony. Located at the Internet Archives.
ROCKit 🔥
Or is it rockET 😂🎸 👽
bro i'm not kidding a portion of this video is literally the exact same script as on their other video called how spacex reinvented the rocket
I know!! I thought I was rewatching the same video
$10,000 per kg, that's insane.
Without SpaceX I wouldn't be in a bachelor's program to become an Aerospace Engineer now. I can't wait to work on projects like this and get the EU up to speed.
The present/future Number One, Mr Musk❤❤❤❤❤❤
@@elonmuskceospaceX i am a Singaporean, living in sweden, is my pleasure Mr Musk following your fine works for better future for us on earth♥️♥️🙏🙏God bless
Elon's "Thunderbirds are go!"
Pretty sure 10K/Lb😊
STAR SHIP
Please cover how the decision is made, to only use turbo pump fuel pumps; and not consider some other means of rocket fuel delivery, to the engines. Are other means even being studied?
What alternative designs for superheavy booster and spaceship recovery, besides Mechazilla, have been considered?
The Chinese- not sure if it’s government or private- have plans for recovering boosters via catching them with an array of cables suspended above a platform. Rocket lab has experimented with helicopter capture, and ULA with the Vulcan will just try to recover and reuse the blue origin BE4 engines from the booster (dumped in the ocean)
@@EntropyConcept Really like the multiple tactic approach. Have seen the helicopter attempt. Looked really dangerous. Still a drone copter with a dedicated design might work. A semi submerged swimming pool, so to speak, of ionized and filtered seawater may have some merit for saving an entire booster.
It's too bad that there's a limit on the number of qualified technicians to execute all the plausible ideas !
When you need to pump fluids the best tool is .. a pump. Then you can implement it with different methods, but turbine cycles are more thermodynamic efficient. Then there is the choose for throwing away part of the fuel and exhaust or reuse them (open vs close cycles). The second considerably more tricky. Then after launch options open for more propulsion methods in cruise phase, such as ion or thermal nuclear. But that’s another chapter completely
@@youerny I like this reply. TY. Your ion allusion is most interesting though. If you could negatively charge both tanks and positively charge the fluid being transferred as it enters the empty tank, would that create a substantial push-pull effect on the fluid that could be electromagnetically pumped and accelerated from full tank to empty one?
Good morning afternoon Thank you for blessing work Elon musk and your people who are working there ❤🇰🇪🇬🇧👑🤴
Space Shuttle was $10,000/kg 10 Years ago but what are the other CURRENT rockets charging per kg???
It’s at @17:00
@arthurmiller-vl6sw No it is not. He only says Falcon 9 at $2,700 vs Space Shuttle at $10,000 10 Years ago...
What are the other CURRENT rockets charging??? meaning - What is Falcon 9's ACTUAL competitors charging?
@@LifeMyWay007 you may want to edit your original post to ask that
starship can and will get rocketry to the next level!
@@elonmuskceospaceX south dakota
@@elonmuskceospaceX since starship 1st flight. and explosion. fun
Now been me up scoty
Nice🙏❤
There is an error on the video at 0:33. That is not a photo of the Spacex team. Since I'm making this comment I take the opportunity to mention that sometimes you put footage of things that don't totally match the news or event you are mentioning. For example, reporting on a present event but putting old footage of the people involved. The script is usually higher quality than the footage representing it, but in the aspect of matching things. Anyway, thanks for the content you are great.
Yeah I was wondering why Andy Lapsa was working at SpaceX with a Stoke T-shirt.