NPP are making it looks Ghana is their's and NDC people are strangers Ghanaians are forced to believe such things and no one is questioning it We all know and feeling they are sinking the nation yet we are all mute, watching the slow dying of the nation The nation is cursed for allowing those who's fathers overthrow Dr Kwame Nkrumah, a power to lead this nation again Ghanaians have a long way to go come 7th December election
This man is so naively foolish. What has NDC done? What is the rules in the parliament? They should break the standing orders just so NPO get their way? Let parliament shut until new president
A simple question that can resolve the present controversy in Parliament in respect of the four vacation of parliamentary seats. Question: *When should a Member of Parliament vacate his seat. Is it during his present term in office or during his probable future term in office, should he win the future election?* Article 97 clause 1, paragraphs g and h of the constitution of Ghana. 1) A member of Parliament shall vacate his seat in parliament - (g) if he leaves the party of which he was a member at the time of his election to Parliament to join another party or seeks to remain in Parliament as an independent member; or (h) if he was elected a member of Parliament as an independent candidate and joins a political party. If it is argued that the member of parliament must not vacate his present seat but rather vacate a future seat if he probably wins a future election, then it would imply that, immediately he is declared a member of parliament in future, he must immediately vacate his seat, so that another election is organized for him to probably win again. This view would amount to causing other parliamentary candidates (including the political party candidates to contest the same elections twice) and to what end? If this view is upheld, it would also imply that a member of parliament who becomes the Speaker of Parliament, must not vacate his present seat in parliament but rather vacate a probable future seat in parliament. It would also imply that upon dissolution of parliament, members should vacate their probable future parliamentary seats. *Second follow-up question* In the context of this discussion, at which point, can it be conclusive that a member of parliament has either left his political party or joined a political party (if he was initially independent) ? *Answer to question two* The time of leaving the political party or joining one (if he was independent) occurs before the end of the present term of parliament. The time of filing for candidacy with the Electoral Commission is therefore reasonably conclusive as the time that he has left his political party or joined a political party (if he was independent). *Final question* Should a political party be the only one to report that a person is no longer a member of the party? *Answer* In this context, any citizen can point out or report a wrongdoing *Summary* Article 97 is clear that the parliamentary seat to be vacated is the present seat and not a future probabilistic seat. The time of filing for candidacy with the Electoral Commission contrary to his "present status in parliament" is therefore the reasonable conclusive evidence that a member of parliament has either left his party, or joined a party (if he was independent); *and must therefore vacate his seat with immediate effect*,,
AKUFFO ADDO AS YOU ARE CALLING HIM THE PRESIDENT DOES NOT KNOW THAT HE IS THE SO-CALLED PRESIDENT OF GHANA AND THE NPP PARTY,AKUFFO ADDO IS NOT MATURED WHEN IT COMES TO GOVERNANCE AND THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALSO THINKS SHE CAN CONTINUE TO MANIPULATE THE LAWS AND MAKES IT LOOKS LIKE SHE IS ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION OF GHANA ,THE ANGER OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE IN THE COURTROOM AGAINST THE LAWYER WAS ALSO AN ACT OF IMMATURITY AND THIS NONSENSE MUST STOP
PLEASE DONT BEG BUT RATHER LOOK THROUGH THE SO-CALLED BILLS AND SEE WHICH ONE IS IMPORTANT? THE 58 MILLION DOLLARS MAN MADE MANHOLE IN THE MIDDLE OF ACCRA IS OF NO IMPORTANCE?MR JANTUAH THE 350 MILLION DOLLARS TAX EXEMPTION TO THEIR CRONIES HAS NO IMPORTANCE TO YOU ❓❓IF YOU WANT TO STAY NEUTRAL PLEASE STAY NEUTRAL AND BE BOLD TO CALL THE SPADE A SPADE
I love the last part. "NDC, you have made your point and we have heard you very clearly and understand you. But for the sake of Ghana, just go back to your previous seats so that the country can move on."
@@EddieEddies-ig5uz NOBODY IS STOPPING THE COUNTRY GHANA AND NO ONE CAN STOP THE NATION BUT THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE 1992 CONSTITUTION IS ABOVE THE JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT TOO
Pride comes before a fall. If you have a parliament like this, it's negotiation that makes it work
Kwame Jantuah you're a real Ghanaian... you love Ghana for sure...THANKS
Hon. Osei Bonsu was able to handle the differences through negotiations. That's a leader 👍
It's true.Npp thinks Ghana belongs to them and they are wiser than everyone.We will vote Npp out.
Whether minority or majority, work can still go on. Where from this pride of ' yen pini, yen pin?
NPP are making it looks Ghana is their's and NDC people are strangers
Ghanaians are forced to believe such things and no one is questioning it
We all know and feeling they are sinking the nation yet we are all mute, watching the slow dying of the nation
The nation is cursed for allowing those who's fathers overthrow Dr Kwame Nkrumah, a power to lead this nation again
Ghanaians have a long way to go come 7th December election
Our npp party is gone, and I wondered why the elders in the party allowed akuffo Addo and his gangs to do this to the Elephant party. What ashame
Please, let us for mature brains to go to Parliament and conduct business for the Country
Mr. Jantua, very deep
This man is so naively foolish. What has NDC done? What is the rules in the parliament? They should break the standing orders just so NPO get their way? Let parliament shut until new president
The man ask,enter parliament as what? Was Afenyo voted to parliament as an mp or majority leader
A simple question that can resolve the present controversy in Parliament in respect of the four vacation of parliamentary seats.
Question:
*When should a Member of Parliament vacate his seat. Is it during his present term in office or during his probable future term in office, should he win the future election?*
Article 97 clause 1, paragraphs g and h of the constitution of Ghana.
1) A member of Parliament shall vacate his seat in parliament -
(g) if he leaves the party of which he was a member at the time of his election to Parliament to join another party or seeks to remain in Parliament as an independent member; or
(h) if he was elected a member of Parliament as an independent candidate and joins a political party.
If it is argued that the member of parliament must not vacate his present seat but rather vacate a future seat if he probably wins a future election, then it would imply that, immediately he is declared a member of parliament in future, he must immediately vacate his seat, so that another election is organized for him to probably win again.
This view would amount to causing other parliamentary candidates (including the political party candidates to contest the same elections twice) and to what end?
If this view is upheld, it would also imply that a member of parliament who becomes the Speaker of Parliament, must not vacate his present seat in parliament but rather vacate a probable future seat in parliament.
It would also imply that upon dissolution of parliament, members should vacate their probable future parliamentary seats.
*Second follow-up question*
In the context of this discussion, at which point, can it be conclusive that a member of parliament has either left his political party or joined a political party (if he was initially independent) ?
*Answer to question two*
The time of leaving the political party or joining one (if he was independent) occurs before the end of the present term of parliament.
The time of filing for candidacy with the Electoral Commission is therefore reasonably conclusive as the time that he has left his political party or joined a political party (if he was independent).
*Final question*
Should a political party be the only one to report that a person is no longer a member of the party?
*Answer*
In this context, any citizen can point out or report a wrongdoing
*Summary*
Article 97 is clear that the parliamentary seat to be vacated is the present seat and not a future probabilistic seat.
The time of filing for candidacy with the Electoral Commission contrary to his "present status in parliament" is therefore the reasonable conclusive evidence that a member of parliament has either left his party, or joined a party (if he was independent); *and must therefore vacate his seat with immediate effect*,,
Npp aguuu koraaa, akroonfooo npp never again shame
AKUFFO ADDO AS YOU ARE CALLING HIM THE PRESIDENT DOES NOT KNOW THAT HE IS THE SO-CALLED PRESIDENT OF GHANA AND THE NPP PARTY,AKUFFO ADDO IS NOT MATURED WHEN IT COMES TO GOVERNANCE AND THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALSO THINKS SHE CAN CONTINUE TO MANIPULATE THE LAWS AND MAKES IT LOOKS LIKE SHE IS ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION OF GHANA ,THE ANGER OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE IN THE COURTROOM AGAINST THE LAWYER WAS ALSO AN ACT OF IMMATURITY AND THIS NONSENSE MUST STOP
What would happen, if one of the Independent Candidates should the Executive President, wouldn't the Parliament do their job,
PLEASE DONT BEG BUT RATHER LOOK THROUGH THE SO-CALLED BILLS AND SEE WHICH ONE IS IMPORTANT? THE 58 MILLION DOLLARS MAN MADE MANHOLE IN THE MIDDLE OF ACCRA IS OF NO IMPORTANCE?MR JANTUAH THE 350 MILLION DOLLARS TAX EXEMPTION TO THEIR CRONIES HAS NO IMPORTANCE TO YOU ❓❓IF YOU WANT TO STAY NEUTRAL PLEASE STAY NEUTRAL AND BE BOLD TO CALL THE SPADE A SPADE
I love the last part. "NDC, you have made your point and we have heard you very clearly and understand you. But for the sake of Ghana, just go back to your previous seats so that the country can move on."
What does the SEATING POSITIONS do for Ghanaians?
Be serious. Tell NPP to grow up and sit anywhere for Parliament business to go on
@@EddieEddies-ig5uz NOBODY IS STOPPING THE COUNTRY GHANA AND NO ONE CAN STOP THE NATION BUT THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE 1992 CONSTITUTION IS ABOVE THE JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT TOO