Dr.SHIVA™: GMO Safety @CytoSolve® Systems Analysis(5/21)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
- Dr.SHIVA™: GMO Safety @CytoSolve® Systems Analysis(5/21)
In this presentation, Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD, Inventor of Email, Scientist, and Engineer, analyzes safety of GMOs. Full Blog Post: vashiva.com/sh...
Get Educated, or Be Enslaved
TruthFreedomHealth.com
To attend an online OPEN HOUSE with Dr.SHIVA this THURSDAY at 11 AM EST or 8 PM EST.
RSVP at: VASHIVA.com/ORIENTATION.
Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD, Inventor of Email, Scientist & Engineer, Candidate for US President is committed to health, education, and innovation.
Dr. SHIVA’s most recent innovation is the Truth Freedom Health® SYSTEM that is an educational, community, and technology platform that is enabling everyday people to become wiser and smarter - to think beyond Left & Right, “Pro-” and “Anti-” - by learning the SCIENCE OF SYSTEMS - to see things as they truly are to know the real problem to innovate the real solution.
To learn more about the Truth Freedom Health® System, visit TruthFreedomHe... and contribute to this global educational movement to become a Warrior-Scholar.
Find out more at TruthFreedomHe....
Be the Light!
Dr.SHIVA
e: vashiva@vashiva.com
w: vashiva.com
w: TruthFreedomHe...
w: Shiva4Presiden...
Twitter: @va_shiva
Facebook: / va.shiva.ayyadurai
RUclips: / @drvashiva
Gab: gab.com/ShivaA...
Rumble: rumble.com/c/D...
Telegram: t.me/vashiva
Bitchute: www.bitchute.c...
Odysee: odysee.com/@dr...
Gettr: gettr.com/user...
TikTok: / drvashiva
My dad died from Monsanto’s Cotaran DF aka Agent Orange, after taking phicer I thought fatigue was from some kind of O2 deprivation--felt like sickle cell 🤷🏽♂️ your description of formaldehyde build up and glutathione depletion from GMO intake makes sense to me! TY so much.
Amazing presentation
Thank you Dr Shiva
Thank you.😊
Amazing info. Thank you
You're the best! And everyone is starting to see everything you said about vivek, musk, Trump and Co. is 100% truth!!!
Monsanto…😼…💥BAM-BAM-BAM💥 👋🏼bye-bye!
"You body doesn't know the difference" they say about high fructose corn syrup vs other sugars. Yet MY body knows.
This is relevant to your presentation only because that's always their story: 'same as natural.' Bogus as a $3 bill.
You are correct. I find I need a trip to the lavatory when I eat high fructose corn syrup. Join me Thursday at Dr Shiva's open house. The link is in the above description
Thank love you.
Thankyou
👏👏👏🙏
The discussion about substantial equivalence sounds a little fishy. There are some GMO plants that HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED by FDA. In at least some of these cases, the company introducing the product disagreed, but complied. A very interesting case was Starlink corn, where one of the routine tests, made to assure that a new GMO crop will not have a risk of being allergenic, is to expose the new protein to human digestive juices. If it is not broken down very quickly, it is not approved, even if it passes other non-allergenicity tests. The company, Aventis, thought it digested quickly enough but FDA disagreed. Aventis complied, but went back and repeated the test using digestive fluids from various farm animals, getting much much faster digestion. So Aventis went back to FDA and asked for approval to grow the corn as an animal feed. And FDA rather unwisely allowed that. A few years later, Starlink was showing up in human food. It was never an allergen, but the company was directed to remove, at great cost, every last bit of Starlink corn anywhere. There was another case, a GMO salmon, that never failed any safety or environmental test, but took about thirty years to win approval. This is wildly different from the picture you paint of approval being a simple matter of the company choosing, like blueberries, the color and fat content.
Sweet corn is less than 3% of all corn grown in the US. Can you address the research on the safety of Bt sweet corn. There are differing papers. I understand the difference between Ht (herbicide resistant) and Bt (pest resistant) corn and I am not in favor of Ht. The alternative to not using Bt sweet corn requires the use of pesticides to control the European corn worm to have a viable crop. Without either Bt corn seed or pesticide use, the crop can suffer an almost complete loss which makes growing sweet corn useless. I believe most sweet corn sold in stores (fresh and frozen) is Bt. Stuck between a rock and a hard place here
About Ht corn, before there were any GMO crops in existence, the most used herbicide in the world was atrazine. A big reason atrazine was used so much is that corn, as God made it, is completely immune to atrazine. Atrazine was used exactly the same way as glyphosate is used now. And atrazine is significantly more toxic to people and animals than glyphosate is. Besides that, glyphosate is somewhat sticky so it doesn't freely flow through soil and thus get into ground water. Atrazine flows through soil so easily that it is hard to keep it out of ground water.
Please don't misunderstand me. I am not a fan of controlling weeds with herbicides. But I do worry that campaigns to ban the use of glyphosate could have the bad effect of increasing farmers' use of other, worse herbicides.
Seven dust.
Your slide at 6.5 minutes includes dairy products. No, the closest I can come to that is cheese curdled with an enzyme from a cow, so that hard cheeses can be made without slaughtering calves. Or did you mean the goat modified to produce spider silk proteins in its milk, which nobody eats? Hardly in the top ten. Also, although there are GMO tomatoes, they hardly count as one of the top ten. Here's a strategy for avoiding GMO tomatoes, if you want to. Do nothing. That's much more than 99% effective. To bring that to 100% don't buy a tomato with purple flesh. And as to peas, perhaps I am wrong, but I don't think GMO peas ever made it to the market, although one was approved in October 2024.
O come on, Dr. Ayyadurai. I've met you. You are a very smart man. But in the first four minutes, you've shown how a smart man can use the truth to leave a very untrue impression.
Start with the bit about "developed in a lab". You contrast that with developed by crossbreeding. Do you actually not know that there are dozens of methods of breeding and many of them are very much dependent on laboratory technology. Even some selective breeding is done in laboratories. How about exposing seeds to gamma rays? How about using colchicine to cause an organism to have four of each chromosome, instead of the normal two, and then crossing the original (diploid) plant with the created (tetraploid) plant to get a progeny which is triploid and therefore seedless. Or using the same trick with oysters - the triploid oysters don't waste their energy dispersing sex cells, so they grow faster. How natural is it to graft a twig of a branch that bears desirable fruit onto the stem of a tree that has hardy and productive roots? Do you know that virtually all the fruits we eat that have variety names are grown this way, and not from planting seeds? And what is so bad about stuff done in a lab? Do you ever have blood tests? Done in a pasture? Would you suggest that vaccines be developed in a garage?
On to the confusion created when the normal people use the term GMO (genetically modified organism) to mean, by plain English, an organism that has been genetically modified. When the anti-GMO folks WANT to be precise, like in drafting laws or suing someone, they say Organism Genetically Modified Using Recombinant DNA Technology - but OGMURDT isn't easy enough for people to remember.
This is tiring, but let's get to the tomato and flounder story. It really happened. Let's see how. A company called DNA Plant Technology wanted to see if they could make a tomato frost resistant. That would be a good thing where we live, in Massachusetts. They knew about an arctic flounder, which has a gene that produces a protein which has an anti-freeze property. So they tried transferring that flounder gene into a tomato. When some of the tiny tomato plants were large enough to plant, they exposed them to cold air, and they died. The experiment was clearly a failure, so DNA Plant Technology abandoned the project. Is this, in your honest opinion, giving your listener a representative example of what is being done to their food? Or did you just pick something that would sound shocking?
It's probably worth mentioning that, although horizontal gene transplant is quite rare, life's history on earth is long enough that such wild gene transfers do happen enough to matter. Only a few years ago it was shown that sweet potatoes contain two genes from the bacterium Agrobacter tumafaciens, the very tool humans first used to transfer foreign genes into plants. And probably due to virus infections, we humans have many genes that came from distantly related organisms.