The Left Launches Attack On Supreme Court
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 июл 2024
- The far Left is outraged over the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision regarding presidential immunity for President Donald Trump. President Joe Biden claims that the Justices have created a lawless country for U.S. Presidents, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) threatened to impeach the Supreme Court Justices.
aclj.org/government-corruptio...
#news #biden #supremecourt
How bout schumer threatening judge Kavanaugh on tv ?
Chuck threatened 2 republican judges.
And they call themselves the civilized party.
I’ve come to the conclusion that Biden is in capable of telling the truth.
We are used to their tantrums, like patient parents.
I don't remember back in the day anyone talking bad about the supreme court. This is so sad
Because they want rid of the Constitution, they are Marxist.
I've never seen a Supreme Court so corrupt. They are what you call unethical
Politicians always want to have their way and Biden's reelection is largely hinged on Trump's case because the democratic party knew Bideen never won in the 2020 election and now it's more difficult for him because he is in office for 4years and nobody to complain about.
What concerns me are the three descending votes.
Dissenting
@@dairyair5371 Thank you.
I believe Congress has asserted implied immunity from time to time. If there was no immunity for Congress, insider trading charges would be filed on almost all of them.
It's all constitutional
Reversing Roe or Chevron isn’t flaunting ‘long standing law’, rather it’s making right the unconstitutional original wrong; Wrongs which should have never been the ‘Law of the Land’ in the first place.
Absolutely!
Joe, has been "juiced" to some degree each day AFTER the debate.
I agree, but he was actually juiced his entire career; he drank the "Stupido Kool-Aid"; probably had an IV of it.
I stopped wondering about what 1930's Germany looked like
The entire Alvin Bragg thing is a joke. I mean seriously, deriving criminal charges from a bookkeeping entry ?
Are they going to PROTEST at their homes again???
Trying to redirect from Bidens problems
I like to see her explained this did she read the ruling?
Thanks
SCOTUS defends the Republic of the Constitution. SCOTUS deserves respect.
FOX MUTING MY PILLOW. WHAT A BUNCH OF B.S.
I Never Seen So Much In The United States Of America, History.
They're jumping for joy, bec it benefits THEM, NOW.
Everything they're saying that Trump could do, THEY CAN NOW DO.
They're just telling you what they're going to do but substituting Trump as their example?
Joe, Joe, Joe, we've been decrying you and your shenanigans for decades!
More reason the SC be offensive against its enemies.
You know as well as I do that the prosecutors could have gone into that court and simply said ' TRUMP is guilty ' and still would have all convictions the same.
Let the crybabies whine, that's all they can do.
The far left was close enough to smell poop in his pants. Joe lost control.
There's still time for God to bring his children to HIM
That is a Federal Offense to threaten the Judges of the United States Supreme Court no matter who you are, let's go Republicans and do your job, "No One Is Above The Law".
There is a possibility that address was lipsynced with an AI generated voice speaking his lines
When you tell the people to pay your fair share of taxes only to have your own son avoid paying his taxes, charge your chief political opponent for mishandling classified documents that you yourself violated then it would appear no Democrat would suffer the same fate any Republican would under similar circumstances
What I hear from the left is, and i quote....WAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH
Sekulow does not care what crimes trump commits.
Collective amnesia seems to have struck the conservative majority on the Supreme Court, especially around the question: Is the president above the law?
Five of the six conservative justices who ruled to give the president absolute immunity for “core” presidential duties seem to have made contradictory statements during their Senate confirmation hearings.
“No man is above the law,” Neil Gorsuch told Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) during his confirmation hearing in 2017. Gorsuch even doubled down, calling the court’s landmark 1952 decision in Youngstown v. Sawyer, which reigned in presidential authority, a “brilliant opinion.”
Similarly, Brett Kavanaugh told the Senate that “no one is above the law” during his 2018 confirmation hearing, according to CNN. Amy Coney Barrett concurred during her hearing, but like Kavanaugh, obfuscated on presidential pardons, according to The New York Times. “That question may or may not arise, but that is one that calls for legal analysis of what the scope of the pardon power is,” Barrett told the Senate on the extent of the presidential pardon. Kavanaugh told the Senate, “The question of self pardons is something I have never analyzed.”
In Samuel Alito’s confirmation hearing he told the senate that “no president, Democratic or Republican, no president is above the law, as neither are you, nor I, nor anyone in this room.” Alito also praised the Youngstown ruling, adding that during Watergate it was “the responsibility of the judiciary to hold fast,” in forcing President Nixon to abide by subpoenas.
Chief Justice John Roberts concurred, citing Youngstown as binding the president to the law. “Senator, I believe that no one is above the law under our system, and that includes the president,” he said in his 2005 confirmation hearing. “The president is fully bound by the law, the Constitution and statutes. Now, there often arise issues where there’s a conflict between the Legislature and the Executive over an exercise of Executive authority, asserted Executive authority. The framework for analyzing that is in the Youngstown Sheet and Tube case, the famous case coming out of President Truman’s seizure of the steel mills.”
All of these Justices lied to Congress in their Confirmation Hearings. If what they claimed then that “No one is above the law’, then they should all be eligible to be indicted by the Justice Department for lying to Congress just like any other American is.
These Liberal Justices have a right and a duty to call out these Justices for who and what they truly are - liars. With this, I Dissent.
You cannot disagreewith the supreme court it it sacrosanct. Has to be, that is the purpose.
QUESTION: If Trump's actions in office are immune, would his interactions with Bannon & Navarro also be protected & vindicate them for claiming presidential immunity on info January 6th committee wanted?
😂😂 That dang constitution!
The effectual, fervent prayers of the righteous availeth much...Is anything too hard for GOD? Oh Justice shall prevail...⚖️ Jesus is King, Yeshua Hamashiach.
Biden term 2 must increase the number of justices until it gets a liberal majority. The American people will back President Biden.