Размер видео: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Показать панель управления
Автовоспроизведение
Автоповтор
bro ur awesome u make maths reasonably funny
love your vids dude....
🤯
instead of multiplying the first row by the first column, can you multiply the first column by the first row?
No; Matrix multiplication is none associative. If u have 2 matrices A and B, AB≠BA generally. What you are implying is effectively doing BA instead of AB. Which will not result in the same outcome. So short answer is No.
@@kayanhaider50erm technically it is associative, what you meant was commutative
@@pashi47 thanks for the correction, that comment was a year ago tho lmao
![Cofactor Expansion: (Determinants 1/2) [Passing Linear Algebra]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_75SbA6WKfs/mqdefault.jpg)
![Cofactor Expansion: (Determinants 1/2) [Passing Linear Algebra]](/img/tr.png)
![MOST IMPORTANT LINEAR ALGEBRA VIDEO - Invertible Matrix Theorem ON ROIDS [Passing Linear Algebra]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P74M9suLIEU/mqdefault.jpg)
![Matrix Inverses [Passing Linear Algebra]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hXj2tnFfvis/mqdefault.jpg)
![How to Find the Standard Matrix of a Transformation: Transformations (3/4) [Passing Linear Algebra]](/img/1.gif)
bro ur awesome u make maths reasonably funny
love your vids dude....
🤯
instead of multiplying the first row by the first column, can you multiply the first column by the first row?
No; Matrix multiplication is none associative. If u have 2 matrices A and B, AB≠BA generally. What you are implying is effectively doing BA instead of AB. Which will not result in the same outcome. So short answer is No.
@@kayanhaider50erm technically it is associative, what you meant was commutative
@@pashi47 thanks for the correction, that comment was a year ago tho lmao