PTRD 41: The Simple Soviet Antitank Rifle of WWII

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 май 2018
  • / forgottenweapons
    Cool Forgotten Weapons merch! shop.bbtv.com/collections/forg...
    The Soviet Union had originally eschewed the use of large numbers of antitank rifles, anticipating that any potential combat use of them would be largely against tanks impervious to AT rifle cartridges. However, when German forces came flooding across the border in 1941, the Soviet Union found themselves being attacked by quite large numbers of tanks which were in fact vulnerable to an antitank rifle cartridge. Stalin ordered an immediate development and production of such a weapon, and the designers responded with concepts. Simonov produced the PTRS-41, a semiautomatic 14.5mm weapon that was sophisticated, expensive, and effective. Degtyarev produced the PTRD-41, a single shot 14.5mm weapon which was simple, cheap, and also effective. Both used the same cartridge, which fires a 980gr armor piercing projectile at a remarkable 3320 fps.
    Both the Simonov and Degtyarev rifles were ordered into production, with the PTRD-41 being available and fielded within a month because of its very simple nature. By the end of the war some 185,000 of these rifles had been made, and even after the new German tanks became impervious to them, they remained effective weapons for use on light armored vehicles, field guns, machine gun nests, pillboxes, and other hardened targets.
    The PTRD-41 is a mechanically interesting and unusual weapon in that despite being only a single shot system, it is recoil operated. When fired, the entire barrel assembly recoils rearward, absorbing some of the immense recoil energy and also opening the bolt and ejecting the spent case. The shooter then need only drop a new cartridge into the action and close the bolt to be ready for a subsequent shot.
    If you enjoy Forgotten Weapons, check out its sister channel, InRangeTV! / inrangetvshow
    Contact:
    Forgotten Weapons
    6281 N Oracle #36270
    Tucson, AZ 85704

Комментарии • 3,2 тыс.

  • @esthera3923
    @esthera3923 4 года назад +1751

    Who would win:
    - Glorious, finely-made Kruppstahl
    - Some weird metal tube developed in 22 days

    • @dweebus3698
      @dweebus3698 4 года назад +16

      The panzer 1 is glorious?

    • @esthera3923
      @esthera3923 4 года назад +158

      @@dweebus3698 The 14.5mm rounds of the PTRD could go through the side armor of most Panzer IIIs and IVs at close range up until the Germans started adding side skirts to their tanks. Considering those (and their derivatives, such as the StuG III) were the most common German tanks for most of the war, I'd say the PTRD was fairly effective in its role.

    • @gogopedroe1873
      @gogopedroe1873 4 года назад +3

      Finely made what?

    • @TheMrDemonized
      @TheMrDemonized 4 года назад +16

      Glorious my ass

    • @yuriy8756
      @yuriy8756 3 года назад +61

      Ilya Kaplunov, the Soviet 24-years old marines sniper with PTR, knocked out 9 (nine) Manstein's tanks during one day 1942 about 35 km to Stalingrad. Awarded posthumously as the Hero of the Soviet Union.

  • @Igor_lvanov
    @Igor_lvanov 6 лет назад +7794

    Stalin: I want an antitank rifle
    Degterev: When?
    Stalin: Yesterday

    • @BigBoss-sm9xj
      @BigBoss-sm9xj 6 лет назад +460

      Blin!

    • @josephaugustine4876
      @josephaugustine4876 6 лет назад +426

      Here you go comrade Stalin

    • @albvscommesincastello6346
      @albvscommesincastello6346 6 лет назад +126

      Made my day Man... i laughted so hard on this

    • @kiiik8801
      @kiiik8801 6 лет назад +114

      PTRD was developed few years before the war. It was abandoned becouse Red Army was to conquer Europe and this kind of gun is usseles when troops advance. In 1941 when Soviets defend themselves all they had to do was to put gun into production

    • @jeremystewert4303
      @jeremystewert4303 6 лет назад +60

      I want to see the giant SKS.

  • @IncredibleMD
    @IncredibleMD 4 года назад +2653

    "So, the controls."
    Ian's brain momentarily skips as it struggles to conceive of what actually counts as a "control" on this tube.
    "... There's a trigger."

    • @iaial0
      @iaial0 4 года назад +168

      "makes it go bang"
      A Big Bang I might add

    • @Mike_Rogge
      @Mike_Rogge 4 года назад +53

      You could call the bolt handle a control, it mechanically manipulates a moving part.

    • @user-yc1xe1pd1f
      @user-yc1xe1pd1f 2 года назад +13

      Lol. But actually, it’s not forgotten weapon. It’s even used on some shooting ranges with blank shells. (Not bullets, damn it, shells 😂)

    • @TheMsdos25
      @TheMsdos25 Год назад

      _T O O B_

    • @DoNotTrustTheSVN
      @DoNotTrustTheSVN Год назад +1

      @@user-yc1xe1pd1f and Ukraine too, but with those insane rounds.

  • @nickparka7981
    @nickparka7981 4 года назад +1940

    This video itself is longer than the design process

    • @epauletshark3793
      @epauletshark3793 3 года назад +149

      But not as long as the rifle.

    • @GhostOfDamned
      @GhostOfDamned 2 года назад +8

      Lmao

    • @mikeburch2998
      @mikeburch2998 2 года назад +8

      @@kristoffer3000
      I agree! Russian engineers are superb in everyway. They are also very pragmatic.

    • @norcaljuche
      @norcaljuche 2 года назад

      thats soviet engineering for you!

    • @EzekiesAcheron
      @EzekiesAcheron 2 года назад +1

      It's literally a boom tube with a muzzle break lol

  • @kkrummelrhs
    @kkrummelrhs 4 года назад +1489

    "That Panzer is history Sergeant!"
    "Good shooting comrade, now pop your shoulder back into its socket"

    • @oerlikon20mm29
      @oerlikon20mm29 4 года назад +39

      Would a soviet sergeant really care if his men were wounded though, he'll just find a replacement

    • @ironwoodnf
      @ironwoodnf 4 года назад +96

      @@oerlikon20mm29 a sergeant might have... It was the officers and politburo

    • @hellfiredoughnut1434
      @hellfiredoughnut1434 4 года назад +58

      You dont need clip of bullets for this weapon. You need clip of soldiers to shoot

    • @Abdega
      @Abdega 4 года назад +33

      @@oerlikon20mm29 This one would care, he needs help carrying that thing

    • @celticman1909
      @celticman1909 4 года назад +25

      Actually the recoil was taken into consideration with the energy absorbing system. The German 1918 Mauser Tank Gewehr13.2mm anti-tank rifle was just an upscaled shoulder abusing weapon.

  • @Slysheen
    @Slysheen 6 лет назад +930

    "22 day development timeframe"
    Jesus, necessity really is the mother of invention.

    • @CassiusGreen
      @CassiusGreen 4 года назад +70

      Can't afford to waste any time when under attack, because the germans won't wait for you to finish your guns that's for sure.

    • @Mephiles343
      @Mephiles343 4 года назад +34

      @@CassiusGreen the russians didn't fuck around that's for damn sure lol

    • @coolstorybro_cant_wait_4_movie
      @coolstorybro_cant_wait_4_movie 3 года назад

      5f saqqqaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa fee á

    • @dallaswood4117
      @dallaswood4117 3 года назад +12

      We went from the wright brothers to landing on the moon in a couple decades thanks to World War One World War Two and the Cold War so yeah something about thinking you’re going to be wiped off the face of the earth really expedites the process

    • @IncredibleMD
      @IncredibleMD 2 года назад +6

      Stalin looming over his shoulder probably helped more than necessity.

  • @nazarderkach9320
    @nazarderkach9320 4 года назад +3816

    Soviet soldier: *_loads and aims a PTRD_*
    His right shoulder: *_My time has come_*

    • @Luciffrit
      @Luciffrit 4 года назад +27

      Just look where his digits are hiding... ( ಠ ͜ʖಠ)

    • @kubakawulka7532
      @kubakawulka7532 4 года назад +38

      Nah, Tankgewehr was even worse

    • @ReySchultz121
      @ReySchultz121 4 года назад +13

      It's my left shoulder for me.

    • @Stu787878
      @Stu787878 4 года назад +63

      @@TheJimyyy Tankgewehr had no recoil mitigation though.

    • @swampfolk2526
      @swampfolk2526 4 года назад +20

      Ну дорогой, просто нужно положить на плечо пару варежек зимних или шапку или еще что то. И пинок в правое плечо будет не смертельным.

  • @alexkoptev
    @alexkoptev 4 года назад +3852

    My grandmother made these guns in 1941. She was 17 years old.

    • @absolutelydisgusted8665
      @absolutelydisgusted8665 4 года назад +557

      She played a small part in disabling more than one German tank.

    • @envrnmntlsm
      @envrnmntlsm 4 года назад +152

      thats metal

    • @duartesimoes508
      @duartesimoes508 4 года назад +56

      In which Oblast was she?

    • @TheIfifi
      @TheIfifi 4 года назад +50

      @ wow. Lol... okaaaay.
      You go be you man!

    • @JackFrostIsHere
      @JackFrostIsHere 4 года назад +22

      @ probably just a lying show off just cause the the person making the top comment might be a Russian

  • @ivanmonahhov2314
    @ivanmonahhov2314 6 лет назад +4024

    After WW2 they were used as hunting rifles in the far north. Now you may ask "what they were hunting with these ?" Whales.

    • @lucignolo8333
      @lucignolo8333 6 лет назад +331

      Also bears

    • @dereenaldoambun9158
      @dereenaldoambun9158 6 лет назад +122

      Elephant?

    • @5anjuro
      @5anjuro 6 лет назад +598

      Some daring tribal warriors would set out in the Arctic Ocean to try and challenge the mighty Ktulhu with it. Their kayaks had a reinforced mount kind of like a punt gun.

    • @ToyDirigible
      @ToyDirigible 6 лет назад +133

      Lassi Kinnunen *woooosh*

    • @Plymouth888
      @Plymouth888 6 лет назад +66

      Quite elegant, in a STEN type way.

  • @patrikhjorth3291
    @patrikhjorth3291 6 лет назад +3070

    "I suppose Stalin was the kind of guy you took seriously when he said something like that"
    Ian, Master of Understatement.

    • @AtheistAnarchoCommie
      @AtheistAnarchoCommie 5 лет назад +33

      I thought the same

    • @lordmountbatten154
      @lordmountbatten154 5 лет назад +8

      me tooooooohhhh

    • @alexhayden2303
      @alexhayden2303 5 лет назад +40

      At Stalingrad 13,500 were executed for not getting on with the job!

    • @gratius1394
      @gratius1394 5 лет назад +105

      @@alexhayden2303 That's a whole division's worth of manpower, do you really think that the Soviets would be so wasteful when all available troops were desperately needed? Such high rate of executions is a myth just like mindless human wave attacks often portrayed in modern movies. Just think about it - why simply kill thousands of deserters and other AWOL types when you can form few penal battalions and use them for extremely dangerous/unpleasant tasks like cleaning minefields? Hell, if you want them dead, just give them few grenades and throw them at the Germans in "Enemy at the gates" style attack - killing them yourself is just... counterproductive.

    • @alexhayden2303
      @alexhayden2303 5 лет назад +1

      @@gratius1394 I'm here to learn!
      www.independent.co.uk/news/world/world-history/revealed-the-forgotten-secrets-of-stalingrad-8282751.html
      Zaytsev:
      The Criterion Collection DVD of, 'Enemy at the gates', has a Bonus section with an interview of Z. who tells how they killed the top German sniper, and what it cost them!

  • @user-ky9sq8sy8k
    @user-ky9sq8sy8k 4 года назад +1503

    "Half-semiautomatic" - so, mathematically speaking, it is actually 1/4-automatic?

    • @jauzaafaishalahmadpadmadis3846
      @jauzaafaishalahmadpadmadis3846 4 года назад +148

      With that fire rate, that's basically a bolt action, without bolt action

    • @DickHolman
      @DickHolman 4 года назад +130

      It is fully self-unloading, so half the reload procedure is automatic.
      I'll get me coat.

    • @novemberalpha6023
      @novemberalpha6023 4 года назад +66

      Quartermatic??

    • @Abdega
      @Abdega 4 года назад +6

      @@novemberalpha6023 Ninja’d by two months

    • @Pershingtank
      @Pershingtank 4 года назад +40

      Well, tank cannons are considered "semi automatic" when they automatically eject the casing but still have to be manually loaded, so I suppose it would fit that sort of case.

  • @commanderkei9537
    @commanderkei9537 2 года назад +199

    The importance of this gun cannot be overstated. It’s presence alone essentially prevented entire isolated groups of infantry from being overrun by something as simple as a half track with an mg. Considering how much the Soviets were forced to embrace pocket defense, something like this was like a modern caltrop sprinkled all over the battlefield. Not at all devastating, but something to force armored cavalry to slow their role and be careful where they tread, and something that would tear apart a hot-headed, careless charge

    • @morganbeasley
      @morganbeasley Год назад +9

      good take

    • @just9911
      @just9911 11 месяцев назад +9

      Even against organized and aware opposition, they still add a wrinkle to the Soviet defense in depth and offer capabilities you don’t get with other weapons. I don’t think nearly enough people realize how many different vehicles from a variety of nations were thrown at the Soviet forces.
      This added to mortars, rifle grenades, and machine guns can make for a really bad day for any axis unit that has to deal with a force equipped as such.
      The entirety of the eastern front is really hard to wrap your head around, for me it got to the point that reading the numbers of things like casualties and soldiers committed to a given battle made my brain go numb.

  • @roadtomanitoba9753
    @roadtomanitoba9753 4 года назад +940

    My grandfather was this gun operator from being conscripted in Sept 1943 to May 1944. He never shot into actual tank main job was suppressing machine gun nests and he got a pretty good in it, his citation for "Slava" is specifically about that. He was trained and tried to shot aircraft with it as well but it just wouldn't happen. After liberating Sevastopol in 1944 his rifle was taken from him to arsenal and he never seen it again. After relocating to Baltic front he was handled PPSh and went on with it untill the very end.
    And another non obvious thing, reloading the gun was a task of second guy in a team, so this thing had impressive rate of fire with shooter eyes always on a target.
    Iconic russian movie "Aty baty" set around the platoon of "Tank fighter" armed with these things and my grandpa was noticed that it was not at all realistic. Actors have never actually fired this thing, just faking the recoil and then moving the bolt manually.

    • @Shaun_Jones
      @Shaun_Jones 3 года назад +96

      I suspect that finding actors willing to take the abuse of shooting this for real is a somewhat difficult task.

    • @max_955
      @max_955 3 года назад +42

      Shooting aircraft with that thing, it's just epic.

    • @namvo3013
      @namvo3013 2 года назад

      @@max_955 it happen in mgs games

    • @CallofDutyBlackOps28
      @CallofDutyBlackOps28 2 года назад +11

      understandable; firing something like this means "so long shoulder; i knew ye well"

    • @oceanbytez847
      @oceanbytez847 2 года назад +9

      @@Shaun_Jones actors do crazy stuff like losing and gaining tons of weight or muscle all the time. I bet finding an actor who would take the abuse of this thing for a reasonable price is more likely the exact issue.

  • @montimuros2837
    @montimuros2837 6 лет назад +3914

    - What do you like the most about Russian guns?
    - They work

    • @leeshang6419
      @leeshang6419 5 лет назад +137

      Because they have less to screw up.

    • @Dr_V
      @Dr_V 5 лет назад +216

      This reminds me of some winter hunting trips when my old IJ12, often ridiculed and criticized by my fellow hunters, was the only gun that never jammed or misfired. I'm also using an antique IJ16 inherited from my grandfather, less powerful but very accurate and equally reliable. I tried a number of modern shotguns over the years, decided to stick to my venerable Russian ones, they may be modest but they do the job properly every time.

    • @themadhammer3305
      @themadhammer3305 5 лет назад +20

      @@Dr_V out of curiosity was that a shotgun developed for military use? Or was it made for the civilian market in Russia

    • @Dr_V
      @Dr_V 5 лет назад +60

      @@themadhammer3305 They're both civilian hunting weapons, the 12Ga is a regular series from the 1990s, the 16Ga is from a special batch ordered for Romanian police and military personnel in the 1970s (my grandfather was a police sergeant back then), but besides some particular decorative markings it's no different from other shotguns of the same period.

    • @themadhammer3305
      @themadhammer3305 5 лет назад +5

      @@Dr_V fair enough must just have been a good design. The 16Ga sounds like an interesting piece of history I'll have to give it a look to see these decorative markings

  • @hermatred572
    @hermatred572 3 года назад +236

    Degtyaryov: how precise are we talking here
    Stalin: minute of tank

  • @kovaskovas
    @kovaskovas 2 года назад +58

    My grandfather, master sergeant Ivan Stepanocitch Vasiliev was a PTRD operator from 1942 till 1944. He was killed in action by nazis during Dnepr crossing operation. Thank you for a possibility to get some understanding what he passed thru as a PTRD operator.

  • @akspsm
    @akspsm 6 лет назад +715

    My grandfather was fighting in WW2 with this rifle. Participated since June 22, 1941 and until the end of the war . Participated in the Battle for Stalingrad, were he was wounded more than once. Survived the war. Never talked about it much. He told me that you had to be really close to the armour 100-200 mm to get positive results, from the side of course. The idea was to penetrate the armour and the projectile ricochets inside the armour killed everyone inside. Or just destroy the tracks, when armour is too thick.
    Super cool videos!!!!

    • @lathrin
      @lathrin 5 лет назад +5

      Prove it

    • @BoBaH_BoBaHoB
      @BoBaH_BoBaHoB 5 лет назад +34

      my grandpa was fighting with DP-28

    • @SephiMasamune
      @SephiMasamune 5 лет назад +62

      Getting really close is an understatement if you have to be within 10 to 20cm from the tank. ;-)

    • @tianxiu
      @tianxiu 5 лет назад +18

      @@SephiMasamune "It is personal", said the Russian comrade. XD

    • @odizzido
      @odizzido 4 года назад +24

      Might as well say screw it and just put the barrel right against the armour at that point. Go big or go home.

  • @Hamachingo
    @Hamachingo 5 лет назад +2171

    PTRD: Post Traumatic Rifle Disorder

    • @roskcity
      @roskcity 4 года назад +57

      I have been diagnosed with PTRD

    • @lolbosss
      @lolbosss 3 года назад +25

      I have new symptoms

    • @zombies4evadude24
      @zombies4evadude24 3 года назад +18

      That beautiful sound strikes fear in the hearts of men. I envy and pity the soul on the other side of that shot.

    • @TiocfaidhArLa34
      @TiocfaidhArLa34 3 года назад +15

      the ptrs will give you ptsd, post traumatic shoulder disorder.

    • @godmodejustgharuhi5610
      @godmodejustgharuhi5610 3 года назад +38

      @@TiocfaidhArLa34 post trigger shoulder dislocation.

  • @yoboikamil525
    @yoboikamil525 3 года назад +305

    My granddad was armed with this thing when he was fighting alongside the soviets in the 1940's. he said how it made him feel like the most powerful man in the world for about 10 seconds before he got spotted. Many close calls.

    • @DukeOnkled
      @DukeOnkled 2 года назад +43

      Can definitely see that, operating something like that would feel like pointing god's own finger at someone.

    • @andrewshepherd1537
      @andrewshepherd1537 2 года назад +15

      Gunner, do you see that bunker? I don't want to any.ore

    • @zjanez2868
      @zjanez2868 2 года назад +17

      Smiting the enemy with 14.5 mm divine judgment

    • @kennethjackson7574
      @kennethjackson7574 Год назад +3

      The muzzle brake blast, whether in snow or dirt, often gave away their position, so (A) the two-man crew tried to have one or two places to relocate in mind before firing, and (B) shoot-and-scoot likely offset the unreliability of the semi-automatic PTRS, making PTRD vs. PTRS a push.

    • @Uncle_Smallett
      @Uncle_Smallett Год назад

      ​@@kennethjackson7574 not fact. First of all, you will not go to attack with this thing. You'll be firing from position. And at war, when you stop - you DIG. These things usually used from trenches, foxholes etc, not so easy to be hit by direct fire.

  • @DeNihility
    @DeNihility 4 года назад +848

    Meanwhile in Canada...
    "Hi, I wanna buy this pistol"
    "You got the proper paperwork and licensing?"
    "Uhh, on second thought, how about this cannon instead?"
    "Sure, here you go. Oh, and here's your receipt."

    • @whyme943
      @whyme943 4 года назад +92

      Pistols are used in the majority of shootings. AT rifles are unlikely to be used for criminal activity.

    • @mohammadnoor8429
      @mohammadnoor8429 4 года назад +266

      @@whyme943 is that a challenge?

    • @Alpha.Phenix
      @Alpha.Phenix 4 года назад +238

      @@whyme943 *Those are some brave words for someone in PTRD range*

    • @tequila7419
      @tequila7419 4 года назад +10

      You still need a license for non restricted guns btw

    • @mr523592891
      @mr523592891 4 года назад +37

      Tequila and someone can easily buy a nr rifle on CGN without showing the pal. Even he shows, there’s no way for the seller to confirm that is his. Canadian firearm laws are literally retarded. Come up by some liberals who have all their knowledge from movies.

  • @SeaWasp
    @SeaWasp 6 лет назад +1185

    For Canadians, let this sink in a moment. Non-restricted in Canada.
    Edit on 6th of May 2020: Not anymore :(

    • @SweatShopActual
      @SweatShopActual 5 лет назад +26

      Yup.

    • @joshuahadams
      @joshuahadams 5 лет назад +135

      For when you want to keep bears away. Maybe put a big hole in one.

    • @iloveindomienoodle
      @iloveindomienoodle 5 лет назад +151

      For when you want to keep a pack of wolves away, you better disnintegrate the alpha and let the rest fly with the shockwave

    • @mrpyromaniac675
      @mrpyromaniac675 5 лет назад +35

      Where can i get one in canada? For hunting

    • @chrisnelmes7180
      @chrisnelmes7180 5 лет назад +19

      Ummm....good luck finding ammo.

  • @RedLegs13B.
    @RedLegs13B. 5 лет назад +180

    I really admire the engineering that went into the recoil/ejection system is setup on this weapon. Simple & effective.

    • @JensTomiczny-rn9dy
      @JensTomiczny-rn9dy Год назад +1

      Ja genau sie ist simpel und einfach aufgebaut. Mit der richtigen Maschine und etwas Ahnung davon würde man es hin bekommen. 👍😊😉

  • @blacklightdeen4473
    @blacklightdeen4473 4 года назад +427

    Soviet: *Sees a German Tank*
    Also Soviet: " *Ivan. Get The Shoulder Cannon*
    "

    • @b226tj
      @b226tj 3 года назад +9

      The Soviets later(Early 90's) made a production 4 gauge pump action shotgun, because someone didn't want the rest of their 23mm AA gun barrels.
      Edit: It's called a TOS-123 apparently.

    • @CircusFoxxo
      @CircusFoxxo 3 года назад +4

      @@b226tj KS-23*. 6-gauge.

    • @literal_f22
      @literal_f22 2 года назад +2

      @@b226tj KS-23M

    • @sonicfon
      @sonicfon 2 года назад +1

      @@b226tj KS-23

    • @jonaszimmermann1361
      @jonaszimmermann1361 Год назад

      ​@@b226tj it's KS-23, TOZ-123 is a civilian smoothbore version.
      And it started in late 70s

  • @sshar71
    @sshar71 4 года назад +35

    10:20 not for speed, but for extracting the inflated cartridge case. Removing the cartridge case after the shot was the main problem of all the Soviet PTRs. The kit included a hammer, which was used to knock out the bolt with a cartridge case. This often destroyed the bolt. This is an original solution to a complex problem. After the shot is fired, the bolt opens and the remaining gases push out the cartridge case. Sorry for the bad English

  • @ArcadiyIvanov
    @ArcadiyIvanov 6 лет назад +297

    When I was a kid on my dacha, an older kid from the neighborhood dug up this exact gun (or remnants thereof) in the village about 5 clicks East from Mga. We did get the stock to move and the only way to do it was to force-drop it vertically onto its stock. A spring still worked after 50 years in the ground.

    • @1anthonybrowning
      @1anthonybrowning 6 лет назад +23

      FlymanMS Probably confiscated. Communists can't abide an armed populace.

    • @barthoving2053
      @barthoving2053 6 лет назад +59

      Yeah that's why they do not force most of their male population to serve in the military for a short time through conscription. O wait, most communist and totalitarian countries did/do this. And conscription is basically not only arming your populace but also training it in the use of those arms.
      In the Soviet Union I think around 13 government agencies were allowed to have firearms. That included organisation like the state Railroad company and Firefight departments. If an uprising would have occurred in the Soviet Union It would have been really easy for the rebels to get their hands on light weapons if they wanted to. However as they knew taking up arms would just mean that the tanks would have been sent in sooner, they almost never did it and chose for civil disobedience. And in the end the Soviet Union capitulated to the pressure of unarmed protesters.
      And do you think people living isolated in primal forest full of wolves and bears , would have been allowed to have hunting rifles?

    • @ivanmonahhov2314
      @ivanmonahhov2314 6 лет назад +30

      In USSR to purchase a shotgun , you needed : a hunting license ! Yep , that was it get a license to cull an animal and go to shop in the countryside and buy a shotgun. Pistols and rifles were a major pain to obtain , pistols only as signs of good service to officers when obtaining certain rank ( Colonel )

    • @TheAkaish
      @TheAkaish 6 лет назад +6

      Wrong. In Russia to purchase a hunting weapon you need both a hunting license and hunting weapon license. Also you can purchase sports weapon (pistols as well) with sports weapon license. For example here: www.air-gun.ru/sportivnoe-oruzhie/sportivnie-pistoleti You can't purchase auto rifles in Russian, pistols with hunting weapon license and use magazines more than 10 rounds for hunting rifles. Main idea is that self defence laws in Russia is a piece of junk and you can go to jail if you kill unarmed criminal. Also for self defence purposes with self defence weapon license you can buy just fucken rubber bullet shit.

    • @Timsturbs
      @Timsturbs 6 лет назад +13

      *Something* *Awful* so killing an unarmed person is ok for you? could you name me a country where killing an unarmed people wont lead you to the court?
      people here was talking about ussr, why do your inflamed brain brought up current russia here?
      and i hope you would experience that "rubber bullet shit" on your sad anarchistic ass.

  • @iamt_tl
    @iamt_tl 6 лет назад +490

    really i can't imagine any guns that's more effective than this. 22 days paper to production with so much simple, practical yet well thought and useful features like the semi bolt-action - i'm like 'how the heck' until i saw the explanation. I mean it served its purpose till 1943 and still being used today! 22 DAYS!!! Soviet Russian indeed.

    • @skotiskiller
      @skotiskiller 5 лет назад +37

      a product of socialist relations of production

    • @fear-is-a-token
      @fear-is-a-token 5 лет назад +8

      Check out the SG-43 machine gun, it has a similar story behind)

    • @fear-is-a-token
      @fear-is-a-token 5 лет назад +2

      @@skotiskiller daaaamn right, dude

    • @joeloco5129
      @joeloco5129 4 года назад +42

      Necessity is the mother of invention. You'd be amazed what you could produce in 22 days if you were hearing reports of your comrades being skinned alive by the thousands.

    • @mobilegamersunite
      @mobilegamersunite 4 года назад

      Word!

  • @chancemoser7568
    @chancemoser7568 4 года назад +91

    "Penetrate 35mm out to 300yds" Gotta love the seamless blend of metric & SAE units there 😂

  • @Twerkulies
    @Twerkulies Год назад +7

    I love the fact that if you can source just a couple parts, you can literally fabricate this in your garage in a day if you have a welder and a few bucks to buy supplies from Lowes.

  • @IgoRAZ12345
    @IgoRAZ12345 5 лет назад +102

    Wow, I thought it was just a pipe with bolt and pistol grip. Now I see that it was robust and clever engineering design with that recoil system and aiming arrangements.

  • @A_Eichler
    @A_Eichler 5 лет назад +215

    Not a gun collector, but I have a certain fascination with them. This channel is an informative, intelligent and well presented set of videos. Kudos.

  • @balazsbuza5610
    @balazsbuza5610 3 года назад +15

    I actually fell in love with this metal pipe. It's simplicity is charming

  • @bololollek9245
    @bololollek9245 3 года назад +13

    Degtaryev was really a genious to come up with such a simple gun so fast.

  • @alexprokhorov407
    @alexprokhorov407 5 лет назад +241

    I want the full auto version, please. This thing reminds me of a tractor anecdote. The Russians sent us the blueprints for the newest tractor, but whatever we tried we built a tank

  • @Antigonus.
    @Antigonus. 6 лет назад +531

    If you think 1911 hammer bite is bad, just wait until you experience PTRD 41 face bite.

  • @jacefairis1289
    @jacefairis1289 3 года назад +50

    "I suppose Stalin was the sort of guy you took seriously when he said something like that" haha, well said

    • @levar6618
      @levar6618 3 года назад +3

      Смейся-смейся, кгб уже ждет тебя

  • @updidi
    @updidi 4 года назад +24

    My grandmother was made this anti tank rifle in military factory of WW II

  • @MlTGLIED
    @MlTGLIED 6 лет назад +323

    I have these 14.5x114mm as a bottle opener. It is always an eye catcher for visitors 😁

    • @lucignolo8333
      @lucignolo8333 6 лет назад +1

      Where’s your pub mate?

    • @MlTGLIED
      @MlTGLIED 6 лет назад +63

      At home in the backyard 😉
      you are always welcome

    • @lucignolo8333
      @lucignolo8333 6 лет назад +11

      if you'll ever find yourself in italy just write me in this comment section pal

    • @PieterBreda
      @PieterBreda 6 лет назад +17

      You should consider using a live round. Far more exciting

    • @davell1078
      @davell1078 6 лет назад +11

      I made the Metro 2033 lighter, but with a 12,7mm. It's like the capitalist version.

  • @jeyendeoso
    @jeyendeoso 6 лет назад +265

    that rifle is around 0,9 hickok45s units of length

    • @worldoftancraft
      @worldoftancraft 5 лет назад +3

      please explain meme

    • @becauseiwasinverted5222
      @becauseiwasinverted5222 5 лет назад +34

      @@worldoftancraft hickok45 is really really tall

    • @worldoftancraft
      @worldoftancraft 5 лет назад +5

      @@becauseiwasinverted5222 thank you. Im a perception persone, but do not marked that fact

    • @KC-bg1th
      @KC-bg1th 4 года назад +1

      Handgun*

  • @silvinchoren9810
    @silvinchoren9810 4 года назад +115

    Stalin: Big gun now
    Degterev: What it should have?
    Stalin: 11:51

  • @carlmcdaniels1675
    @carlmcdaniels1675 4 года назад +40

    Actually, The PTRD was used as a sniper weapon in Vietnam. I remember talking with at least one former company commander who stated that the reason for him assuming command when he did was due to his predecessor receiving a round to the chest from a PTRD. The owner of the PTRD was killed shortly after.

    • @quadroninja2708
      @quadroninja2708 3 года назад +2

      Knowing that USSR helped Vietnam, that is not surprise

    • @VT-mw2zb
      @VT-mw2zb 2 года назад +6

      @@quadroninja2708 the Russians handed the Vietnamese a bunch of PaK40s too, to use and field guns and light artillery, which were captured from the Germans.

    • @minimalistic_banhaus
      @minimalistic_banhaus 5 месяцев назад

      Did the predecessor recover from his wounds?

  • @claudiaberger9639
    @claudiaberger9639 5 лет назад +286

    My father was employed in 1943 in a sd kfz251 on the Eastern Front. In one use, his vehicle was shot at with a Russian "Panzerbüchse". The driver lost both forearms. Bad time back then.

    • @alt-monarchist
      @alt-monarchist 5 лет назад +64

      My great grandfather joined the Red Army in 1941. He made it all the way to Berlin

    • @alexandrkovalev5082
      @alexandrkovalev5082 4 года назад +56

      @@mishka-m ты бы хоть выражения выбирал. Наши предки сражались с ублюдками и фашистами не для того чтобы их предки сами уподоблялись.

    • @foxy126pl6
      @foxy126pl6 4 года назад +6

      @Арсений Корчевский nost of the pepole there don't even understand what is he saying (incuding me) so don't worry. Let me guess, he was calling him a nazi or something?

    • @foxy126pl6
      @foxy126pl6 4 года назад +1

      @Арсений Корчевский oof

    • @IsaacESFR
      @IsaacESFR 4 года назад

      Good

  • @rotwang2000
    @rotwang2000 6 лет назад +133

    Another interesting point is that unlike other armies where they were often parceled out and spread over units to provide some kind of AT capability, these guns were grouped into large units and fired in volleys at enemy tanks and even though they were unable to penetrate the front armour, things like the commander's cupola, vision blocks, machinegun ports, radio antennas, etc were fair game and usually ended up being ruined. Even if they didn't penetrate the armour, they could sometimes cause spalling and with enough of them hitting a tank, this could be nasty. This became such a problem that the Germans added Schurzen, which unlike common belief were designed to slow down and divert shots just enough they would bounce off the enemy's armour. Even Panther was vulnerable to them, especially the lower hull, where you had a gap between the wheels and the upper hull which was sloped and thick enough to stop shots, They added skirts to protect those vulnerable flanks.

    • @PROkiller16
      @PROkiller16 6 лет назад +27

      Don't forget the fear factor. When you've got something knocking on your armour your concern isn't going to be what calibre it is.

    • @softstone125
      @softstone125 6 лет назад +17

      You're right, but I'll add one more moment.
      In 1941, we had big problems with anti-tank weapons - army needed more and more to compensate for losses on one hand, on the other - we need to equip units created in the the course of mobilization in RKKA.
      Anti-tank rifles in this situation it's some kind of confidence for our infantry, that it will have something to counter the panzers, except grenades and courage. (and alsi all this - cheap and with minimal use of the machine tools)

  • @bbelsito
    @bbelsito 4 года назад +9

    I'm not even a huge fan of guns but the combination of Ian's ability to storytell and the stories behind these weapons make these videos amazing, even for someone laxed about guns.

  • @jamesjross
    @jamesjross Год назад +2

    "Comrade Degtyarev - Brilliant gun... ... Simonov, what have you come up with?"
    "Hold my Vodka"

  • @DaiReith
    @DaiReith 6 лет назад +2069

    Typical Soviet engineering, quick, dirty and viciously effective....

    • @umka7536
      @umka7536 5 лет назад +32

      Hmmm. Mostly not.

    • @themadhammer3305
      @themadhammer3305 5 лет назад +68

      @@umka7536 depends what you shoot it at I guess

    • @MichaelS-vy1ku
      @MichaelS-vy1ku 5 лет назад +8

      @@themadhammer3305 these weapons were for guerilla forces not regular army.

    • @steeltrap3800
      @steeltrap3800 5 лет назад +84

      @@MichaelS-vy1ku
      They were part of the standard TO&E of a Soviet rifle division.
      A new TO&E was issue for Soviet rifle Brigades in April 1942. One change was the inclusion of an AT rifle platoon in each of the 3-4 battalions, as well as an AT battalion that included 48 AT rifles (and AT guns).
      In other words, regular Red Army.

    • @Bialy_1
      @Bialy_1 5 лет назад +11

      and based os someone else work(you forgot to add), locking mechanizm is a rip-off from Polish Wz. 35 anti-tank rifle... That in Italian manual made after they Italians tested them got up to 50mm of penetration (rifle much smaller and not so heavy).

  • @DerTypDa
    @DerTypDa 6 лет назад +707

    That thing probably holds some record for "most lefty-unfriendly gun ever". Plenty of guns may spew hot brass in your face, but this guy would probably just crack your skull right open.

    • @Statusinator
      @Statusinator 6 лет назад +353

      You'd think a device made by communists would be good for lefties

    • @aaronorr5586
      @aaronorr5586 6 лет назад +53

      Statusinator *Shwing!* Thunk! "Hole in one people, hole in one!"

    • @timeforgottenprince8271
      @timeforgottenprince8271 6 лет назад +25

      It was of simple design, so making one for left-handed people probably wouldn't be too hard.

    • @deltavee2
      @deltavee2 6 лет назад +11

      Yup, nuthin' but bwains for about 15 feet behind you.

    • @Suyamu
      @Suyamu 6 лет назад +63

      There was nothing lefty friendly in the Soviet Union, because the Soviets considered being a lefty something that needs to be fixed. So they did. They made lefties write and do everything else with their right hand etc...

  • @raffaellouis4326
    @raffaellouis4326 2 года назад +16

    The Real Anti-Titan Rifle

  • @reymisteryo9163
    @reymisteryo9163 2 года назад +6

    The weapon that triggered "the rumbling" with 20% discount.
    "I just keep moving forward, until my enemies are destroyed...
    Tatakae! Tatakae!"

  • @giostisskylas
    @giostisskylas 5 лет назад +234

    If there is no more ammunition, you simply take the massive bolt and kill the enemy with it.

  • @volvo1354
    @volvo1354 5 лет назад +466

    the German maintenance battalions had to hate these things, damaging road wheels, drive sprockets, and tracks of armored vehicles

    • @cursedcliff7562
      @cursedcliff7562 4 года назад +94

      *Russian soldier hits the inside road wheel of a panther*
      FFFFFFFFFU-

    • @ZionPattersonsprofile
      @ZionPattersonsprofile 4 года назад +57

      when they werent breaking themselves, that is

    • @essentialjazzforaspiringmu1605
      @essentialjazzforaspiringmu1605 4 года назад +27

      Id imagine they would have bigger things to worry about *cough cough* 150km *cough cough*

    • @cianmac3934
      @cianmac3934 4 года назад +10

      @@ZionPattersonsprofile there was a few pathers with 4-5k km on the transmission so they werent too bad in fairness haha

    • @ReySchultz121
      @ReySchultz121 4 года назад +47

      German engie: bruh i just repaired that track 10 minutes ago.

  • @hitman911946
    @hitman911946 3 года назад +29

    This gun is the perfect representation of soviet engineering, simple, good enough, and easy to use

  • @MakinamiPhYT
    @MakinamiPhYT 2 года назад +21

    Is this where the anti-titan rifle is based from?

  • @thegoldencaulk2742
    @thegoldencaulk2742 6 лет назад +1937

    Any chance you'll be able to test one against some armor in the future?

    • @FarrYaweh
      @FarrYaweh 6 лет назад +65

      useless against modern armour.

    • @ivanmonahhov2314
      @ivanmonahhov2314 6 лет назад +168

      vs APC and IFV and MRAP in can be useful

    • @thegoldencaulk2742
      @thegoldencaulk2742 6 лет назад +100

      Evidently I made this comment before I finished the video. If anyone _is_ looking for existing PTRD-41 footage, our old pals at Marstar have some video of theirs.

    • @TheKodiak72
      @TheKodiak72 6 лет назад +33

      Anti tank guns were useless against late WW2 tanks.

    • @pulseweld
      @pulseweld 6 лет назад +39

      the ammo for this weapon is priceless, and probably worth just as much as the gun

  • @104jones
    @104jones 6 лет назад +198

    No concerns about short sight radius on this baby

  • @battleoid2411
    @battleoid2411 3 года назад +8

    Its really interesting, you can even see when he zooms in how rough the surface finish is on the various components of the gun, you can tell that they just threw the stock on a lathe, got it down to tolerance in like a couple minutes, and then moved on to the next one. Even just that detail shows how breakneck the production pace was on these.

  • @fireaza
    @fireaza 4 года назад +97

    "Herr Kommandant! We have word that the Russians have developed an anti-panzer rifle! Though, judging from the reconnaissance photos, to be honest, it looks as they've just strapped a bunch of pipes together."
    "Ho ho ho ho! They take us for fools, do they? But let us humor them! Send in our lightest panzers! Their inability to defeat even our lightest armor should make it clear who is the superior military force!"

    • @imperialguardsman5726
      @imperialguardsman5726 3 года назад +11

      Germans,a couple minutes later: *TERRIFIED GERMAN SCREAMING*

    • @heymedic6398
      @heymedic6398 2 года назад +1

      @@imperialguardsman5726 Russian comrade who fired the round and experienced the pain: *Insert drunken russian crying*

    • @theluiginoidperson1097
      @theluiginoidperson1097 2 года назад

      The German Infantry on the other side of the tank: *Who just shot at us?*

  • @thisconnectd
    @thisconnectd 6 лет назад +121

    It's like a mini artillery piece with semi automatic breech

    • @Statusinator
      @Statusinator 6 лет назад +10

      We need to make a half-scale wheeled carriage for it, and then someone could tow it with a bicycle or something

    • @user-yj8vj3sq6j
      @user-yj8vj3sq6j 6 лет назад +3

      +Statusinator
      they added wheels on the later versions

    • @ivanmonahhov2314
      @ivanmonahhov2314 6 лет назад +1

      Now you are thing in German aka the conic barreled 20/28 mm rifle which weighted 140+ kg

    • @blackvulture6818
      @blackvulture6818 5 лет назад

      @@Statusinator like a maxim gun carriage?

  • @Dispo030
    @Dispo030 6 лет назад +191

    this gun ist the essence of Sovjet engineering. what a beauty!

    • @SebastianSonntag
      @SebastianSonntag 6 лет назад +50

      “Ask a Soviet engineer to design a pair of shoes and he’ll come up with something that looks like the boxes that the shoes came in; ask him to make something that will massacre Germans, and he turns into Thomas Fucking Edison.”
      ― Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon

    • @Dispo030
      @Dispo030 6 лет назад +4

      I was speaking in terms of simple but effective... but keep 'em coming, I'm open for puns!

    • @Dispo030
      @Dispo030 6 лет назад +17

      mondayfool I don't agree 100%. Sovjets had undeniable issues in the quality of materials and manufacturing and maintenance, but their engineering was in many cases pretty good.
      As an example, NATO fighter jets need in most cases pristine air strips to start and land safely, while USSR jets have the air intakes on top of their wings and you can land them in a potato field. (I exaggerating here ofc)

    • @Bialy_1
      @Bialy_1 6 лет назад

      PTRD design was copying Polish anti-tank rifle not German, it was using scaled up bolt of Wz.35, so yea typical soviet design(steal what ever you can without paying license fees...).

    • @VijayNinel
      @VijayNinel 6 лет назад +20

      Biały where did you get this misinformation? The ptrd bolt is not copied from the wz 35.

  • @sshar71
    @sshar71 4 года назад +34

    10:20 не для скорости, а для извлечения раздувшейся гильзы. Извлечение гильзы после выстрела было главной проблемой всех ПТР СССР. В комплекте был молоток, используя который можно было сломать затвор. Это оригинальное решение сложной проблемы.

  • @EchosTackyTiki
    @EchosTackyTiki 2 года назад +5

    British: I need a mag-fed, precision made destructive device.
    Finns: That, but on skis.
    Swiss: That, but (fuck you, *bullpups your AT rifle.)
    Russians: Angery toob.

  • @ShotgunGabe
    @ShotgunGabe 6 лет назад +463

    To be honest i wasn’t impressed when i saw the gun because it looks like a cheap pipe gun, but then you showed me the auto ejecting mechanic and i suddenly want one.

    • @MaximilianBrandt
      @MaximilianBrandt 6 лет назад +68

      It's a good gun. My father used one when he was in Angola. They were calling it "Безумная кочерга" - mad poker is the right translation. It is enough to blow holes in medium armoured vehicles.

    • @ObsoleteVodka
      @ObsoleteVodka 6 лет назад +104

      That's soviet engineering at its best. Deceivingly simple yet elegant and efficient. True zero-nonsense design.

    • @NarcassiticGamer
      @NarcassiticGamer 6 лет назад +12

      You mean you didnt want something in 14.5?

    • @ShotgunGabe
      @ShotgunGabe 6 лет назад +5

      NarcassisticGamer im more of a 20mm guy XD

    • @timeforgottenprince8271
      @timeforgottenprince8271 6 лет назад +14

      Imagine how powerful a PTRD would be if people were asked to improve it with modern technology. Damn. Also, it looks badass, I remember a friend of my father talked about getting to hold one once during some kind of performance. They didn't have any ammunition for it, but they liked to carry it around anyway, because it made them feel like a badass.

  • @bigg1256
    @bigg1256 6 лет назад +448

    * teleports behind you *
    Anti Personal kid

    • @theillyrian9826
      @theillyrian9826 5 лет назад +1

      t. npc

    • @1893Mauser
      @1893Mauser 5 лет назад +22

      *teleports two meters behind you*

    • @zedsdeadbaby
      @zedsdeadbaby 5 лет назад

      lmaoooo

    • @blah5684
      @blah5684 4 года назад

      * stabs you in the back *

    • @ArcturusOTE
      @ArcturusOTE 4 года назад

      Telefrags the kid because the long barrel went through the kid

  • @jasonscarborough94
    @jasonscarborough94 4 года назад +14

    Remember comrades, if the PTRD is damaged to the point that it can no longer fire, the bolt can be used as a mace

  • @scottr.hampton2474
    @scottr.hampton2474 2 года назад +3

    Saw 2 of these in operation in my youth. We were able to inspect the emplacement afterwards. They buried a mortar track up to the top deck, camouflaged with local heavy brush. A rotational ring was installed the bipod feet sat in. VERY EFFECTIVE!

  • @andrewzyazev5656
    @andrewzyazev5656 6 лет назад +193

    У нас в музее воинской славы есть такое ружьё , можно открыть -закрыть затвор , почувствовать вес оружия . Мощная вещь .
    В начале войны это оружие могло уничтожать или повреждать танки ,Т-2/3/4 . Но немцы стали устанавливать экраны и эффективность упала почти до нуля , дистанциях поражения и так была не очень большая 100 -200 метров .
    Но зато это оружие легко и на больших дистанциях поражало и уничтожало технику которая шла на поле боя вместе с танками , бронетранспортеры , самоходные орудия не имевшие сильной брони , а это делало танки менее эффективными без поддержки самоходной артиллерии и пехоты .
    В любом случае это интересное и достаточно эффективное орудие для своего периода , подобные системы в других армиях были либо ещё менее эффективными , либо очень тяжёлыми при в общем таких же характеристиках .

    • @lathrin
      @lathrin 5 лет назад +3

      Да Товарищ

    • @user-zl5it6ud8j
      @user-zl5it6ud8j 4 года назад +5

      Я понял.Аналоговнет.

    • @TikageKadzama
      @TikageKadzama 4 года назад +19

      @@user-zl5it6ud8j анлоги то есть. но что бы стреляло таким же калибром - нет.

    • @sanchesseli
      @sanchesseli 4 года назад +19

      Даже на поздних этапах Войны полюбому было полезней иметь хотя бы одну такую "штуку" на взвод. Целей то достаточно и кроме танков.

    • @_b_x_b_1063
      @_b_x_b_1063 4 года назад +12

      @@user-zl5it6ud8j аналоги были тяжелее и уступали по бронепробиваемости

  • @adaw2d3222
    @adaw2d3222 6 лет назад +141

    It always amazes me how efficient the Soviet industry was during the war.

    • @5anjuro
      @5anjuro 6 лет назад +35

      David White Not in this particular case. The first protocol of Lend Lease was only signed in October 1941. The PTRD was designed and commissioned so quickly because of how urgent the situation in 1941 was.

    • @stephenwoods4118
      @stephenwoods4118 6 лет назад +40

      Be efficient or spend some time in Siberia to think about how you should have been efficient.

    • @RedRocket4000
      @RedRocket4000 6 лет назад +18

      Communist System worked well in mass production while motivated people were available. Natural​ decline of motivation over time caused decline.

    • @mikenuzzo3323
      @mikenuzzo3323 6 лет назад

      That's why they fucking lost???

    • @gregoryfilin8040
      @gregoryfilin8040 6 лет назад +9

      Well, when you have an enemy army marching in, destroying your everything, you need to be quick on your feet.

  • @fratercontenduntocculta8161
    @fratercontenduntocculta8161 Год назад +2

    If you think about it, this has several things in common with the RPG: the weapon is very simple but the real magic is the ammo itself.

  • @kfmathew
    @kfmathew 3 года назад +10

    Saw this gun first in the Russian WWII movie Panfilov's 28 Men.

  • @PeterGKO
    @PeterGKO 6 лет назад +43

    This thing is so cool! That half-semi automatic function has got to be one of the neatest mechanisms I've ever seen. So simple, but extremely practical. As are many Russian designed mechanisms.

    • @bztrd80
      @bztrd80 3 года назад

      U should hear the sound of it... it's like the steps of Godzilla heard from a far distance.

  • @5chr4pn3ll
    @5chr4pn3ll 6 лет назад +74

    Holy crap, you are so damn consistent with content Ian

    • @iLLeag7e
      @iLLeag7e 5 лет назад

      In the 3 years I've been watching I remember 1 day without an upload but he double uploads sometimes so he's well ahead in the long run. Ian is serious about this channel and there is much rejoicing as a result :)

  • @andyweiss80
    @andyweiss80 4 года назад +14

    Panfilov's 28 is on Amazon Prime and has excellent content displaying the PTRD in use.

    • @bztrd80
      @bztrd80 3 года назад +3

      I agree. Also, it's a great movie, well done and... it's a true story.

    • @skateibednet1skateibednet121
      @skateibednet1skateibednet121 3 года назад +2

      Panfilov's division consisted from Kazakhs, Russians and Kyrgyzes. Iron division that stopped Nazis in a few kilometers from Moscow. The most legendary military troop in Red Army.

  • @finder7063
    @finder7063 Год назад +2

    Anyone else notice how this is literally just the Anti-Titan Rifle from AOT?

  • @TexasViking_INFP-t_5w4
    @TexasViking_INFP-t_5w4 5 лет назад +1738

    America: I have a 50 BMG
    USSR: that's cute capitalist comrade

    • @gross56647
      @gross56647 5 лет назад +39

      The US Had bazookas and superior air power and superior artillery which was more of an advantage than the 14.5mm.

    • @TexasViking_INFP-t_5w4
      @TexasViking_INFP-t_5w4 5 лет назад +71

      @@gross56647 it's a joke I hate the USSR anyways

    • @endjfcar
      @endjfcar 5 лет назад +80

      @@gross56647 ...Are you actually sure about that?

    • @aisir3725
      @aisir3725 5 лет назад +37

      @@mephi71101 20mm* well, we have zsu-23-4

    • @webkeeper
      @webkeeper 5 лет назад +145

      @@TexasViking_INFP-t_5w4 hate? Why? You can't blame the Cuban crisis on the USSR, the US had nuclear weapons in Turkey, and this is what started the Crisis. While in Vietnam, the US supported colonialism by suppressing the people of Vietnam in their fight for independence from the French.
      What exactly the USSR did to the US so you would express the hate you have?
      Beyond that, isn't the hate a bad motivator for decisions?

  • @randywatson8347
    @randywatson8347 6 лет назад +84

    That is one very cool rifle.
    Imagine having a salvo of 3 against one tank.
    The bolt could be used as a handweapon 😂

    • @lathrin
      @lathrin 5 лет назад +4

      @Abu Troll al cockroachistan ISIS is too dumb to do shit

  • @rauldemoura2417
    @rauldemoura2417 4 года назад +6

    DAAYUMN!! For a “shoulder fired” weapon, that’s a MONSTER!! I would LOVE to see some footage of this being fired, and see the effectiveness on armor plate!

  • @cottontehbunbun7193
    @cottontehbunbun7193 4 года назад +104

    “This is what god would use to shoot somebody”
    ~Soldier

  • @SamuraiAkechi
    @SamuraiAkechi 6 лет назад +91

    Simonov is pronounced as Seemonov, not Saimonov.
    Speaking of sniper modification, there were numerous frontline modifications of PTRS and PTRD made with PU x3,5 scopes. Obviously, they weren't reliable due to scopes suffering serious damage and loosing the zeroing.

    • @alecingram4669
      @alecingram4669 6 лет назад

      Edward Mass never heard of anyone putting scopes on them but I guess it could be useful when firing such a great long range cartridge. Would love to see one of these with a scope!

    • @gregoryfilin8040
      @gregoryfilin8040 6 лет назад +5

      Understatement there. Scope glass would shatter after a few shots.

    • @coachhannah2403
      @coachhannah2403 6 лет назад +1

      Edward Mass Vasily Yaitzev (so) tried to make a long-range sniper version from the PTRD, and tested it in the field, but the tolerances, especially the ammo, were not up to his needs.

    • @gregoryfilin8040
      @gregoryfilin8040 6 лет назад +1

      Coach Hannah well it makes sense. Ammo made to hit a tank at 200-600 meters isn’t conducive to precision shooting.

    • @traxxasbro5604
      @traxxasbro5604 5 лет назад

      Semen-ov

  • @martentrudeau6948
    @martentrudeau6948 5 лет назад +35

    Thank you Ian, the Russians are very pragmatic when they want to be, the PRRD 41 looks simple, strong, and lethal. Excellent show.

  • @TheFatMob
    @TheFatMob 3 года назад +22

    I can confirm - I'm from Donbass, and I saw PTRDs at checkpoints several times during the early stages of the conflict.
    Now they are more or less obsolete, since both sides have normal RPGs and ATGMs, and more "fancy" units are equipped with modern-day anti-materiel rifles.

  • @SFDPSFDP
    @SFDPSFDP 3 года назад +1

    The content on this channel is fantastic, thank you very much for your dedication and all these videos. Greetings from France.

  • @victorbecerra1085
    @victorbecerra1085 5 лет назад +77

    Damn Russian engineering is both smart and very clever

  • @MarinkoKobas
    @MarinkoKobas 6 лет назад +35

    After 1942 it was still very effective against German halftracks like the sdkfz 250.

    • @TheArklyte
      @TheArklyte 6 лет назад +5

      But it turned from antitank rifle into an antimaterial one. Still better then it's german counterpart that faced this fate long before the war, but still was advertised as one for sake of industrialists keeping their earnings and producing more.

  • @GrasshopperKelly
    @GrasshopperKelly 2 года назад +2

    Turns out they do a good job punching through house walls too

  • @rileyernst9086
    @rileyernst9086 8 месяцев назад +1

    You have to remember that even by the end of the war the majority of German tanks were still earlier models. Late 1943 did not roll around and the Germans all traded in their panzer IIIs and IVs for panthers and tigers.
    BUT we do see the introduction of thicker armour and side skirts. The side skirts were not in response to HEAT rounds like those from bazookas(they would prove to be effective at stopping them though), but from the PTRD, as it was found that panzers and stugs were vulnerable to being hit through the lower side plates. Or the sides and rear of the turret.

  • @marcinfrostymroz
    @marcinfrostymroz 6 лет назад +33

    In "operation think tank" one of the guys (i think Steve Zaloga, but not sure) mentioned that Panther II was designed espacially because of russian AT rifles as normal panther had only 35mm of side armor and those rifles were able to penetrate it. Evemtually the imvention of Schurzen (thin armored skirts) increased the protection to the point where panther II project was no longer needed and got cancelled

    • @eltouty345
      @eltouty345 6 лет назад

      Panzer or panther ?

    • @eltouty345
      @eltouty345 6 лет назад

      You mean Panzer right ?

    • @marcinfrostymroz
      @marcinfrostymroz 6 лет назад +3

      No - i ment Pz V Panther. - source: ruclips.net/video/Jtl2DhoRPnc/видео.html

    • @ivanmonahhov2314
      @ivanmonahhov2314 6 лет назад +3

      original Panther had 40mm of side armor , but unshielded oil piping , it was pretty bad as good hit on hit on the plate would rupture that piping and the plate would be at a very high temperature around the impact point - so this created a mix of air and oil aerosol and a hot metal plate - result of that was predictable. 14.5mm did hgave penetration of up to 50mm at 100m.

    • @eltouty345
      @eltouty345 6 лет назад +1

      Marcin Mróz
      Ok i don't know much about germans ww2 tanks . Thanks .
      Sorry for the spams , pretty bad connection here

  • @RobertMilesAI
    @RobertMilesAI 6 лет назад +315

    13:26 How far back does it go? I'd be worried about your thumb there

    • @migkillerphantom
      @migkillerphantom 6 лет назад +33

      from AI safety to anti-tank rifle safety, quite a leap

    • @gfhjkfghj4208
      @gfhjkfghj4208 6 лет назад +72

      That's only a problem when shooting for the 1. time. As Stalin said, "One thumb, one problem. No thumb, no problem."

    • @WalterBurton
      @WalterBurton 6 лет назад +5

      I was wondering the exact same thing, +Robert Miles. 👍👍👍

    • @Meph648
      @Meph648 6 лет назад +31

      Good day Mr. Miles, I'm a big fan of your channel. I also own a PTRD, and the barreled action recoils just about 3" in total travel. It does stay clear of thumbs unless they're put in the path on purpose. If the shooter has his cheek on the cheekrest, right hand on the pistol grip, and left hand under the wooden block portion of the buttstock, the shooter will not be injured.
      Have a nice weekend!

    • @RobertMilesAI
      @RobertMilesAI 6 лет назад +1

      Good to know, thanks!

  • @Five_Seven7
    @Five_Seven7 3 года назад +4

    The soldiers who use this rife during war, was called Fishermen when they was carrying this rifle

  • @SpeedRunningWarcrimes
    @SpeedRunningWarcrimes 3 года назад +5

    Conscript: what do we shoot with this?
    Commander: Yes

  • @rootbeer666
    @rootbeer666 5 лет назад +5

    It's worth pointing out that the design of the firearm itself around an existing cartridge can be rapid as you demonstrate here, however it takes considerably longer to design a cartridge, especially a special use cartridge like this one.

  • @khps0413
    @khps0413 6 лет назад +169

    Stalin: I want a big gun that can kill a tank, comrade, and I mean right now.
    Designers: Da ( rip a water barrel from street randomly and stick a pillow on the barrel). Alright, here you go.

    • @khps0413
      @khps0413 6 лет назад +1

      FlymanMS What is that mean?

    • @mhamedeid1228
      @mhamedeid1228 6 лет назад +3

      bretty good

    • @IngLurker
      @IngLurker 6 лет назад +5

      it means something like "cheers", as in when drinking a shot. exact translation would be "to health".

    • @RustedCroaker
      @RustedCroaker 5 лет назад +5

      It's "cheers" in Polish, I think, but not in Russian for sure.
      "Na zdorovie" in Russian mean "you're welcome" and it is your response on "thank you" from a guest after a meal you served/cooked to the guest, for example.
      Yet another false stereotype about Russians.
      When drinking a Russian will say "Za vashe zdorovie" ("for your health") or "Budem zdorovi" ("We'll keep healthy" or "cheers" actually), but never "Na zdorovie". Imagine someone say "You are welcome!" as a toast each time he taking a shot, it'll be awkward as hell.

    • @lathrin
      @lathrin 5 лет назад

      Да блять

  • @mykl1673
    @mykl1673 3 года назад +9

    imagine direct impacting a man with this
    he's going home to his family in a bucket

  • @hlubmos2chah945
    @hlubmos2chah945 2 года назад +2

    PTRD41 or PTRS remind me of the anti-aircraft Dhsk 12.7mm heavy machine guns which were heavily used against the slow T-28s and fast Sky Raiders to good effect in the Secret War in Laos during the Vietnam War. Love your videos. Interesting! Thank you.

  • @SergeiKotikov
    @SergeiKotikov 6 лет назад +3

    Ian, thank you some much for sharing this piece of my country's history with us! PTRD is an amazing feat of engineering and production that truly denotes the seriousness of the situation at the time. Cheers!

  • @belokonev-dan
    @belokonev-dan 6 лет назад +47

    Didn't knew PTRD's was manufactured in my home city, Izhevsk.

    • @TylerLL2112
      @TylerLL2112 6 лет назад +11

      Денис Белоконев I have a 91-30 PU from your hometown. Not that it's uncommon. But, it's cool you live there where some amazing rifles were produced!

    • @quadroninja2708
      @quadroninja2708 3 года назад

      В Ижевске много оружия производили

  • @big_bad_cat
    @big_bad_cat 4 года назад +1

    That is some hyper minimalistic weapon with monster power. Bravo Degtyarev.

  • @heres_fatih6977
    @heres_fatih6977 Год назад +2

    "YES STALIN WELL MAKE IT NOW, PLEASE DON'T EXECUTE US"
    and that was how the ptrd 41 was made

  • @user-kj9dj4vr9y
    @user-kj9dj4vr9y 5 лет назад +78

    There is a movie about defending Moscow during Great Patriotic war called "Panfilov's 28" ("28 Панфиловцев"), they made great scenes of shooting this rifle operated by crew of two - operator and reloader. One was shouting "CARTRIDGE!" when he requested reload, another one was always ready to slam the cartridge down into the chamber.

    • @Ni999
      @Ni999 4 года назад +7

      It's available in the US on Amazon Prime Video.

    • @davidolie8392
      @davidolie8392 4 года назад +6

      Panfilov's 316th Rifle Division was one of the first to have a large number of PTRDs issued, which is one reason it was able to fight so effectively.

    • @wino0000006
      @wino0000006 4 года назад

      Funny thing - this was true to all types of guns in the USSR.

    • @Ni999
      @Ni999 4 года назад +1

      @@wino0000006 Reloading pistols like the Makarov must have been a lot harder than I thought.

    • @missbelled6700
      @missbelled6700 4 года назад

      @@Ni999 ruclips.net/video/Tvv42Dz7tl0/видео.html LOL

  • @DieselMcBadass1
    @DieselMcBadass1 6 лет назад +357

    half semiautomatic? As opposed to full semi?

    • @GreenHellTube
      @GreenHellTube 6 лет назад +180

      Semi Semiautomatic

    • @artemoz726
      @artemoz726 6 лет назад +103

      DieselMcBadass1 quarterautomatic. IIRC this is official artillery term for systems like this

    • @whyjay9959
      @whyjay9959 6 лет назад +15

      Quarter-automatic? Para-automatic?

    • @user-dh2ev9sc4c
      @user-dh2ev9sc4c 6 лет назад +45

      Well, in russian terms, PTRS-41 is actually a semiautomatic gun) And what tyoically calls "semiautomatic" - in official russian designation is "self-loading"

    • @Statusinator
      @Statusinator 6 лет назад +12

      Semi automatic reloading, as opposed to semi automatic firing

  • @lumiiv
    @lumiiv 4 года назад +5

    They had actually tried to put optical sight on it during the development but it appeared that the sights couldn't withstand the recoil and went out of alignment or were cracked all too soon.

    • @kimjanek646
      @kimjanek646 Год назад

      Yeah no way a scope could handle the recoil of the barrel moving backwards 🤔

  • @ozmo69
    @ozmo69 4 года назад +3

    SO much thoughtful engineering in such a simple gun. Wow