This is really high quality content thank you! You focus on the key elements of the logistic problem in the correct proportions to paint the best picture of the geopolitical power dynamics involved. I would love to see a similar video about a topic like orbital logistics and how different latitudes affect the viability of different orbits and how this might affect space mining in the future. Keep being consistent and you will succeed!
Yes, absolutely Thorium for our grandchildren. It has taken 70 years to make “break even”; ( energy out equal to energy in). For the next 50 years, it’s Uranium ,gas and coal, uranium being the cleanest and long term cheapest. This is the investment opportunity of a lifetime. It will be life changing for anyone who gets in at these levels.
That has always been the problem with uranium reactors. Very limited fuel supplies and very expensive to exploit. For that reason alone nuclear reactors never were economically viable. Solar and wind are 10 times cheaper.
Nope, the exact opposite is true. We have about 2 billion years worth of uranium and another 2 billion years worth of thorium. 1 kg of uranium worth about $50 bucks can supply your lifetime of energy.
This is the perfect and last chance to get uranium stocks at these prices
This is really high quality content thank you!
You focus on the key elements of the logistic problem in the correct proportions to paint the best picture of the geopolitical power dynamics involved.
I would love to see a similar video about a topic like orbital logistics and how different latitudes affect the viability of different orbits and how this might affect space mining in the future.
Keep being consistent and you will succeed!
Thanks Dawid. Interesting suggestion, I will have to look further into that topic!
Thank you.
We need to change to Thorium for obvious reasons !
Or thorium or radium?
Yes, absolutely Thorium for our grandchildren. It has taken 70 years to make “break even”; ( energy out equal to energy in). For the next 50 years, it’s Uranium ,gas and coal, uranium being the cleanest and long term cheapest. This is the investment opportunity of a lifetime. It will be life changing for anyone who gets in at these levels.
Mankind has never had enough of anything.
I have kazatomprom and Denison and cameco comments please
Thorium.
That has always been the problem with uranium reactors. Very limited fuel supplies and very expensive to exploit. For that reason alone nuclear reactors never were economically viable. Solar and wind are 10 times cheaper.
And they are 100x less reliable. Minor detail you leave out.
@@TheRustyLM nothing more reliable than the sun. It shines every day. Besides you can store solar energy to use at night.
Nope, the exact opposite is true. We have about 2 billion years worth of uranium and another 2 billion years worth of thorium. 1 kg of uranium worth about $50 bucks can supply your lifetime of energy.
@@chapter4travels I'm talking about fissionable material. U238 cannot be used in a nuclear reactor. Nor can Th232.
@@adbogo Both can in a breeder reactor, that's my point.
The solution is to switch to renewable energy sources, then you won't need so much nuclear fuel.