Desperate Situation - Russia's 'Clever' Tactic, Why RU Is Fighting Better - Ukraine Map/News Update
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- G'day Legends, I hope you're doing well,
Today we talk about the Russia's offensive and look at the war map updates.
Video I refer to • As Russia Advances, Uk...
If you're new here thanks for coming across, I served in the Australian Infantry from 2014-2021, With specialist qualifications in Heavy Weapons/Anti-Armour, Combat First Aid, With a tour to Afghanistan as a crew commander of a Armoured Mobility Vehicle.
Upon my Return I was unexpectedly diagnosed with a Incurable and Inoperable Brain tumour that is slowly killing me. I was also awarded the Queens Order of Australia Medal (OAM) hence the post nominals after my name. Then Being medically separated from the Army I flew to Ukraine in 2022 for 6.5months and now make content full time. I really appreciate you being here Thankyou
As an independent reporter you make this possible, To support the channel directly.
/ willybeatingcancer
www.paypal.me/...
MERCH
www.willyoam.com/
Telegram:
t.me/Willy_OAM...
Socials:
Instagram: / willy.beating.cancer
Rumble: rumble.com/c/c...
Telegram: t.me/Willy_OAM...
Business Email:
williams.mattphoto@gmail.com
Highlights Channel:
/ @willyclips7517
G'day Legends, I hope you're having a great start to the week! Video I refer to ruclips.net/video/gUvwZkwBUuE/видео.htmlsi=mcbzmg9sZcUzUuf5
Willie, quit being SCARED of telling the truth, we went to grade school, we all know Ukraine can't beat INDUSTRIALIZED RUSSIA, WE LEARNED THAT IN FIRST GRADE. ANY IDIOT KNOWS THIS BESIDES THE WARMONGERS, RUSSIA CRUSHING CORRUPT UKRAINE
So those blast waves from the glide bomb, I wonder how far away you can be from one and still get concussed.
Z
You're wrong about the industrial complex Willy. I love your videos, however you seem to think the west economical systems is an open market, when its not. I'm an industrial engineer from one of the top three industrial cities in the U.S.
Further, i'd ask you, why did the United States outproduce Japan, and Germany during WWII? We also sent equipment to Russia during WWII. Also, I'm a Combat Engineer combat vet.
Willy, I can't understand why you are still applying the "Soviet doctrine" principles of the 2nd WW to the current conflict. 1) Russia does NOT produce inferior armaments, although it produces them in large quantities. This has been proven by Kinzhals, FAB's ability to penetrate western electronic warfare systems where JDAMs have failed against the Russian counterparts, M1A2s and Leopards seem to burn just as well as T72s, Tornado does not seem to have an inferior effect to the ATACAMs. 2) Russian "human wave" tactics are bunk - History Legends as well as multiple other neutral analysts have shown that there is zero evidence of Russians rushing masses of troops vs concentrated fire. In other words: your opening argument is 100% same propaganda as peddled by mass media
@mmazourov How many Russian T-series vehicles are burned out compared to western leopards/Abrams?
@@thomasboland540 russians T-series send to batte have around 40% losses, while Leopards/Abrams around 70%.
👏💯
@@thomasboland540 there aren't even a 100 leopards and abrams combined, theres multiple 1000's of T-72s at any given time in the war.
thank you
Russians are super effective with their shovels and chips from refrigerators...
glonas guided hypersonic spade shovels :)
Lol I think USA has told Ukraine that if they lose all there men and all there land they are winning 🤣😂. So it's winner winner chicken Kiev dinner
@@Neeboopshaw fk that is the vest joke I've heard al year haha you silly girl
Don't forget the tactical Golf Cart's
Hey bro they are now using washing machine with gliders😂
It only took them 36 months to figure out that the country which sent the first man into Space can be 'clever'.
Lmao this never happened russia wasnt the first
@@GracefulBanana What the hell are you talking about? You can't be serious....
Historical facts are historical facts. The Soviets sent a man into space first. The US sent a man to the moon first. There is no debate about that among serious people.
@@GracefulBanana You win first prize in ignorance. His name was Yuri Gagarin, he was the first, and this fact is agreed upon by not so serious people as well.
@@NotYourBusiness-bp2qn ok snowflake liberal 💀
@@tikabass i doubt anyone else has said this bc I am the only one to say this i got this from my own brain not from other ppl
Does Willy believe that Russia is suffering more loses then the Ukraine? He is describing Soviet doctrine like it is being used by Russia. His description of soviet doctrine does sound like the playbook used by the Ukraine in last years summer offensive though. Is that NATO doctrine?
Willy seems to believe the propaganda of very high Russian losses compared to the Ukraine losses even though he says that artillery is the greatest killer of infantry. Other distance weapons are closing the gap though(my guess).
He has to say Russia has suffered more losses otherwise he will alienate his NAFO crowd.
Holt, you make a lot of sense, but remember the Russians have more drones too.
Russia's use of artillery, mines, missiles vastly reduces human losses.
Even during Bakhmut Ukrainian losses were much greater.
Remember the American Nazi that Willie interviewed twice who joined Azov.
He only saw one Russian to take a shot at...but when he ran away through a forest it was littered with dead Ukrainians. It scarred him for life.
The guy's mental state is broken now.
Yep. Arty used to do around 60-65% of ALL wia/kia in both wars (WW1/WW2) and Vietnam. Add in some drones with modern cameras and good fire-control and its scary the damage/response time you have. NOW add in a few FAB-250/500/1500 and now 3000s which make 6 story buildings death traps.
@@eleveneleven572do you remember the video title i want to hear that story
Rosjanie walczą, bo zdają sobie sprawę, że obecna walka jest tak ważna tak jak podczas II wojny światowej, kiedy to wydawało się, że już ZSRR nie ma szans. Przeszło 80 procent Rosjan głosowało za Putinem, bo Rosjanie zdają sobie sprawę, że wojna na Ukrainie to być albo nie być obecnej Rosji.
Most people of the world support Russia,, only corrupt politicians and a few Nazis think otherwise.
Rubbish.
No-one is invading Russia.
Who would be stupid enough to invade Russia
WHO? HOW?
For what goal?
@@user-ul9dv2iv9s who are you trying to BS? I'm 63 an American and for my entire life the west has veen trying to break up the USSR/Russia.
@@user-ul9dv2iv9s United Europe invaded Russia 2 times. US almost pulled it right after ww2. They wanted to build more nukes before attacking Russia but Russia was saved by creating own nuclear weapons to the big surprise of americans. They would do it again if not afraid of nuclear retaliation.
It has certainly happened before.
Certainly Nato has involved itself in Russian affairs and antagonized Russia.
Remember Ukraine were practically forced into their summer counter offensive under the pressure of losing funding if they didn't?
The official narrative then became about Ukraine gaining a better position at the negotiating table?
How we forget...
TBH I don't remember any narrative about negotiations at any point before or during the "spring counteroffensive". It was 100% aimed at breaking Russia's lines and reaching Crimea at the least, or even gaining foothold in Crimea itself.
Maybe some "free" and "unbiased" MSM tried to spin the narrative once they saw the unmitigated catastrophe this "counteroffensive" has turned into, but at least I can't remember seeing such articles.
Ukraine was being forced into a may offensive, not june. Something which would have meant that half of Russian fortified areas wouldn't have been fortified due to lack of green cover.
As you keep saying for year after year.
Why bother with peace talks when you're on a roll.
If the Ukrainians aren't able to recognise what's good for them then that's their loss.
Right?
Cool story Ivan, thanks for sharing...
@Twenty_Six_Hundred, okay, ukro-ivan 😏…
History shows that Americans will in the end, abandon any nation they say they support. From Vietnam, Cambodia , Iraq Afghanistan the list goes on. Ukraine will suffer the same faith.
Abandone and conquer.
Unless is conquer by someone else.
Even if russia Stops now and declare victory, Ukrain soil and hand hand been already SOLD to european and american interest.
Both literally and in th form of Debt that will shackle the people forever
I know, i am uruguayan, we didnt survive condor by killing the dictators, they just make deal when America stop supporting them.
Bodies are still missing, name erased, in 2014 Obama give a TON of erased info to Brazil, meaning they still keep it, when we dont.
Unless said people have billionaire supporters in the US, like Israel..
@@vsovereign3 You mean: unless they influence the entire political sphere, through "campaign contributions".
@kodzotettey1836 - USA, A-OK!
It’s so strange , a country loosing a war is trying to dictate peace . Is that not madness.
No, it's quite crafty actually. Zelensky dictates what HE knows Russia will never accept. War keeps going, and the Zelensky personal finances look better by the day. Madness for Ukrainians but beneficial for him
@@bravolima7394beneficial for western weapons makers … united states of Blackrock
@@bravolima7394 Madness also to all the euro citizens to keep funding this circus.
Willy, get real and look around. 99% of Aussie guys have no desire to fight some wars , God knows where 😅 they just want to make money, drive nice cars and enjoy beer with their mates. Same goes for the Europeans and the Janks . Good luck with your dream of conscription s ! My son will most definitely not going to die for global elites !
I pity the Ukrainians , got sucked in 😢
A few years ago, before the war broke out (but post-2014) I heard a man I knew gave this answer to a question of what would he do if he gets conscripted to fight Russia - "first, I'll get my AK; second, I'll shооt the company officer; and third, I'll switch sides".
I'm from Bulgaria, an Eastern European country, part of NATO. No matter what our corrupt politicians say or do, we will never raise arms against the people who liberated us from 5-century-long slavery.
What will happen if the Neocons in Washington manage their next ambition and start a hot war with China ??
Another aspect of the war is the growing embarassment of ukraine allies. Poland recently asked Ukraine to condemn nazism in its army, Hungary is upset that oil doesn't flow anymore, and a lot of europeans have given so much to ukraine that they put themselves in a dire situation. The F16 case emphasised this : Z ask for 100 hundred jets, but he was able to provide only 6 men who completed the training. How does he responds «the west didn't give enough weapons, and it gave too little, too late». Is he blind or what. No, the ukrainian government try to hide its incompetence by rejecting the fault on his allies. Remember the defense lines in the north ? The west depleted its own defense to provide weapons to Ukraine, there were so much missiles and manpad than Ukrainians soldiers used to shoot choppers with anti tank missiles. The west gave everything except its own soldiers (even that is not sure : the international legion, and others private contractors). Ukrainian is factually losing because they didn't mobilise enough men, and they didn't because they couldn't. The hard truth is that there is a number of ukrainians that don't suport this war, and some may prefer Moskow to Kiev. That's why it can't mobilize on a large scale and ressort to kidnapping.
Willie himself has said that the modern and complex to ope rate western wea pons are being oper ated by west erners and not ukies. I think the evidence was in the leaked german military phone calls.
And of course elenski will point the finger at anyone but themselves. Because he runs a PR campaign.
the EU took Ukrainian side in their oil dispute, this organization is cooked
"Hungary is upset that oil doesn't flow anymore" ... no one ask how it comes that this OIL SHUT DOWN occures 2.5 years after invasion instead of first day of invasion.
NATO should have read Russian history. But they didn't, hence results are obvious and where totally predictable.
Same story F 16's, they'll never get there and if they do, they'll be useless.
@@jackzgb1232 Because everyone understands it would have been a PR disaster and the "unity" push within the EU would have collapsed as Ukraine would be framed as extorting its neighbours.
2 minutes in: Russia is using Soviet Drone doctrine. *sigh*
Brian from new atlas, has been saying this for 2 years. Lol
And the best part is - he's mostly using pro-Ukranian maps to show how Russia is winning. Savage 😅
Even Jacques Baud wrote a book about that in 2023. The West has been slow to catch up, because the West refuses to even understand its adversaries. They would rather think that they themselves are so super moral and awesome and that their farts don't stink. But if you refuse to understand your enemy, how can you hope to defeat them? Which is why the US keeps on losing so many wars.
@@loopmantra8314 - I've only seen him refer to pro-Ukrainian maps. He makes a point of saying he's using a pro-Ukrainian map!! He has been spot-on for 2+ years. In one of his latest posts he reported how Ukraine is expecting to form brigades in a few months, when it takes at least 2-3 years!! Between him, The Duran (and Alex and Alexander's respective shows), Scott Ritter, Ray McGovern, Larry Johnson, Dima (Military Summary), Col. Douglas McGregor and a few others, we have been accurately updated for the duration of the SMO. Each has a different style of reporting and each reports different aspects of the conflict.
Meanwhile, the NPCs watch MSM and think the Banderites can win!!
100%
And so have those like Scott Ritter who cared to take a long hard reality analysis since 2022. Still @ 4:15 call sign "genius" finally realized what Putin has been saying publicly that the Russian army primary objective is to destroy the Ukrainian army.
How come Ukraine doesn't have enough men: we were told one Ukrainian was worth 10 Russians. The demographic is clearly in favour of Ukraine
@toto-yf8tc
The demographic may be in favour of Ukraine ? The amount of artillery , drones,missiles,tanks ,etc is clearly not in favour of of Ukraine . Neither is the casualty count , and the amount of reserves,considering that Russia has 3.5 times the population and is a border nation and not thousands of kms away. Also, The amount of Ukrainian soldiers is not limitless .
Ukraine received hundreds of Soviet aircraft from all the countries that had them. they are much better than the old F-16s. Ukraine doesn't lose planes just because it doesn't have any left
Imagine thinking soviet sensors are more effective than f16, you're in for a big shock Vladimir.
@@adaptiveaussie2216 Mykola, lay of copium
The F16s will not be able to stop the FABS being launched from within Russian territory, but HARMS are going to cause mayhem, less Russian jets will also cross into Ukraine's territory.
@@adaptiveaussie2216in some cases, yes, they are better, ESPECIALLY when it comes to the older F-16 variants of which Ukraine is receiving. The Su-27’s radar is more sophisticated and even has different modes for lock on capabilities unlike the F-16 which is strictly pulse Doppler or etc.
@@adaptiveaussie2216 What do you think is the difference between the Russian Mig-29s available in Ukraine and the NATO F-16s?
Willy, Soviet Union gone almost 35 years ago I'm pretty sure Russia aren't used general strategies from 80th either US/NATO aren't using their strategies from 80th.
Russias first off base of strategy was developed on their soviet docterines even when the soviet union got dusted and their ash still remains on eastern lands they stuck to soviet strategy since it was mostly effective, only for drones to change it instantly so they adapted while still sticking to "What would the soviets do" route
Willy. NATO has more NCOs, but Russia has far more officers. Not obvious that an NCO is better trained than a junior officer.
NATO over-estimates itself.
No idea what you’re talking about, kid.
R4cism! To you understand how the western brain sees the world, the key is supr3mac1st though. Imagine one whi acts like H1tler rulling over a kindergarden, that is traditional european values.
We have built an army for policing the world - the idea was we manage the empire by using airpower and rapid deployment of special operations forces - the Ukraine war is Biden's fetish - Ukraine was not and never was, a US strategic interest (as Biden announced in the days after the Feb 2022 Russian intervention in the CIA-initiated Ukraine civil war) - but involves the opposite of what we've built up over 30 years.
Our strategy and tactics rely on a unipolar world with us as the hegemon power - not the reality - of several great powers (multipolarity) and now instead of one peer power to deal with - two peer powers - as Russian great power war experience and industrial capacity, now makes them de facto, peer military power to NATO/US.
The way out without great power war (resulting in the annihilation of our civilization) is negotiations for a new global security cooperation pact - likely meaning you give China the responsibility for security in her near abroad - and as far as Russia's new found military dominance due to the conduct of this war that Biden et al. forced Russia into producing - is a ring of buffer states who agree to remain neutral on Russia's boarder (so Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Ukraine and Georgia). In other words - a pause - creating a period of strategic neutrality means you can restart your imperium drive to bifurcate Russia after you have built a war industrial base that can supply such a war (which the imperium seems to want to fight at the risk and expense of the western enlightenment itself - a likely function of the MICIMATT - which must be what's driving the politicians to this collective suicide).
To bad most don't understand this but it's good to see the few that do and you should have way more likes
Everyone knew this outcome in 2022. It has played out exactly as predicted. No surprises at all.
Why it is so difficult for you to say that Russian Tactics are better than Nato trained Ukranian Army. Just say it. Nato had no experience whatsoever with this kind of War. They are only good at fighting Bare footed or Sandals Footed enemies, which even that too they Loose Badly.
Yep. Our high ups suck, as they have been selected on the wrong traits.
The US does not lose wars. US taxpayers lose wars, but the commoners always lose wars, even if the country wins, the commoners get nothing. The ruling elites of the US always win wars, it is always a profitable business)
I like Willy, but…
He was just like all Western Military Analysts from the start:
“Russia can’t do manoeuvre warfare” 🤡
He couldn’t recognise another way of fighting other than what he learned
Yes i am wondering the same.
Eman. Your right. How the West thought that the people who gave us Operation Bagration and Operation Autumn Storm couldn't do manoeuvre warfare baffles me!
What are you talking about? Eaven Ukrofacist's have complained how bad is nato training is ! Alliance who was fighting inly against peasants . They never faced sirius army !
well russia is not serius army either so...
@@user-gw1gl4by8d Come and see !
@@user-gw1gl4by8d They're beating the shit outta the best crap we had to send to Ukraine...including our "on leave" soldiers we've sent
Strategic defeat a the hands of Russia might be the best outcome for Ukrainians as a people in the long run. This is not a war of extermination or cultural suppression as Kiev tries to portray it. Goals have been purely political from the start. The sooner it ends, the more people will live to pay back the debts to their allies.
Yea USA knew this was coming. So black rock has pushed themselves into that deal , buying up the fertile ground in Ukraine. Ukraine as a sovereign country is done.
Cutting all ties will have to be part of any peace settlement though. Russia will not settle for just a ceasefire and NATO still being present in the country. The Istanbul treaty was clear on that. The Ukraine has to cut all ties with NATO and be Finlandized, so as to no longer be a strategic threat to Russia. What territory gets changed along the current border is only tertiary to that goal.
@@ChaptermasterPedroKantor-kv5yw Correct, and we all know Ukraine can never agree to those terms. First of all, it's illegal in Ukraine to go for peace with Putin, secondly Ukraine suffers massive Russophobia culturally and politically, if Zelensky gives Russia what they want, Zelensky knows he'll get executed by the ultra nationalists (Azov etc.), so to save his own life, he can never agree to Russia's terms. Also, Ukraine wants to join NATO still, while this one of the reasons this whole conflict started. Only the USA can change this, but I don't hink Trump/Vance can end this conflict, because there's the deepstate (CIA, Pentagon, etc.) that doesn't want this conflict to end I think. Also, there's influence from Blackrock and other major investors. So, it's one big mess and I don't see peace happening anytime soon.
@@ChaptermasterPedroKantor-kv5yw That's a condition that the Ukrainians cannot accept and Moscow knows it. It's a bargaining chip to get a better deal.
This is no future for independent countries in Europe not economically, politically or militarily.
Ukraine already tried it and they ended up a broke, corrupt backwater that was invaded by their neighbour.
Ukraine will not be Finlandised they will be Polandised. With EU taking the western side and Russia taking the east.
The only thing up in the air is how much land the Russians get.
The roles that NCOs play in NATO doctrine is fulfilled by junior officers in Russian doctrine. There is no disposable force in Russian military doctrine.
Ofc, let's ignore the fact that in February 2022 in barely a few days the Russian air force all but wiped out the majority of Ukraine's air force before it even could take off.
Russia is not Soviet Union, and Russia objective is move slowly in order to avoid losses, while destroying Ukraine capabilities. It seems that phase 2 of war of attrition has started but how long will it take for Russia to exhaust Ukrainians, is unknown as both, Ukrainians and Russians, are determined too win and not to give up
If West Ukraine accepted that East Ukraine chose to join the RF this would be over in a day.
Electronics in 90% of all military equipment requires less tech than a mobile phone
Correct but this is misleading. Flagship Mobile phone requires the highest end tech in order to be competitive given limited battery power
Really?
Off to Kyiv the Ruscists go.
@@user-ul9dv2iv9s 1 year old bot account
Sshhhhh🤫🤫🤫🤫
@@alextan2465agree. Bad example. The thing that makes this point better to me is look at when Patriot came out. Even if the very best computer cpu was required at the time, this would mean that cpu would be a joke now. And it wasn’t using the best pc cpu on the market at the time, not even close. It’s just a basic chip. China can make their own intel 10300F processors. For the last year or so. Even Russia could probably make their own chips for missiles
This is precisely what happened in 1941-43 on the eastern front. Having lost their NCO core, the Germans could no longer execute successful offensives, and their lines became more and more static.
Only this time the Russians are the invaders!
Still fighting the great patriotic war art we?
So remind me again who is invading who.
@@user-ul9dv2iv9s Dude, I've never even been to that part of the world. But I do read military history.
@@karol2020 My cultural roots are from this part of Europe.
I'm no spring chicken.
I'm no stranger to Europe.
I'm no stranger to the legacy of ww2.
@@PeacefulRallyCar-pw3cs You make the very bold assumption that humans stop learning once they leave school, while not considering the simple fact there was not anyone proficient in modern war until such a war was actually fought.
Concerning the workforce and NCOs, I would like to add a few elements. In fact, we have a good example of this with a discussion between General Bonaparte who returned victorious from the Egyptian campaign and another French General who had been defeated in Italy. The second General indicates that he was beaten because his army was outnumbered. To which Bonaparte replied that it was normal because “it is always the most numerous who win”. The other General then points out that Bonaparte's army was outnumbered in Egypt, but had won. Bonaparte then responds that this is normal because "it is always the most numerous who win"...
Faced with incomprehension, Bonaparte then explained one of the three basic military principles, first we should not take the overall number, but the number on a point. In fact, the three principles complement each other: concentration of efforts, economy of forces and freedom of action. The concentration of efforts will consist of analyzing the entire enemy force, and concentrating its efforts on the weakest point. Let's imagine that we have 6 very small abcdef groups and the enemy has 3 (ABC) but very strong. If the enemy's point B is the weakest, we will attack him. But be careful: we are definitely not going to attack point B with our abcdef groups because otherwise, the enemy's groups A and C will come to the rescue! We are therefore going to attack enemy group A with our small group a, C with our group f and we are going to attack the enemy's weak group (B) with bcde.
The goal of our groups a and f is not to defeat A and C which is unthinkable in any cases, but simply to prevent A and C from coming to help B. For this we must "save our forces" (economy of forces - 2nd point of military logic): we will calculate the minimum that we must engage against A and C to contain them, and put everything else against B. If we do not put enough forces against A and C, these two groups will break free and help B and if we put too many forces against A and C, we risk having difficulty defeating B.
The 3rd point is that we must maintain our “freedom of action”, therefore a sort of freedom of movement. Because when B is crushed by our small groups bcde, we will have to analyze the situation of group a against A and of group f against C in order to determine which enemy group we must focus our effort on, either depending on the weakness of one of the enemy groupe or depending on the difficulty of our groups a or f to maintain themselves against A and C.
For the moment the Russians are constantly maneuvering while the Ukrainians are losing their "freedom of action" because as soon as they move to help, they create a "hole" and the Russians rush into it. For the Ukrainians the question is therefore permanent: the Russians are advancing on village X. OK, but do we go there, or do we protect village Y, where we are? If the Ukrainians stay on Y, then X will fall and if they move to protect X, Y will fall. As for the concentration of efforts, now it can only be on the Russian side because the concentration of efforts, as said previously, does not only consist of attacking a point, but also of preventing the arrival of help. We must therefore maintain our freedom of action while disturbing the enemy one. However, overall, if the Ukrainians concentrate their efforts on one point, they will no longer have the necessary manpower to fix the Russians on the other points. The breaking point is approaching...
Essentially it's all about attaining local superiority at the weakest point while fixing the entire Frontline.
Willly - Blackrock needs you on the front line Meat. Not talk. 😂😂😂
Russia is smart saving troops stretching the lines. Slowly slowly catch a monkey.
Slowly is the key word
@@user-ul9dv2iv9s Yes but it`s exponential, what was taking months is taking weeks or days now. As Ukraine`s army crumbles it will get quicker and quicker. That`s why Zelensky is in panic mode.
@@MrBeagleblue 100%
@@MrBeagleblue you need to get out of your echo chamber.
The situation has always been fraught for the Ukrainians.
I'll make up my mind when the Ukrainians do.
You seem OK with Russian violence.
Europe now knows what the intent of Russia is.
Poor Willy still bringing out Soviet doctrine to try and cope when there is no proof the Russians are using those tactics.
Those hoorah tactics working wonders
DKyle. You are right. In fact there is ample evidence that they aren't.
Specially when there's more than enough evidence aviation pounds ukies positions b4 infantry kicks in...this is being dobe again and again
i appreciate willy trying to be neutral while being in an environment that brought him and all of his fellow ausies up from childhood to adulthood always getting shoved by the inherent russophobic media agendas from the west. Better to see a truth seeker not the truth denier, though he may not completely find the truth atleast he is seeking for it.
@@Samuel-hd3cpwhere's your proof?? That the Russians arent
The first thing that comes to mind is Ukraine was also in Soviet Union and the Red Army. So their initial fight was with USSR doctrine. Second thing that comes to mind when they speak of training Ukrainian troops in the West, what makes one believe that NATO doctrine is superior? Next is the common perception that Russians are wasteful of manpower. That info comes only from the Ukrainian and western side. That has not been proven. Ukrainians and Russians love their children equally. Next I would use general Syrskyy as an example. He was educated in Russia, he is a Russian like many, many, other Ukrainian soldiers are. And many Generals he fights against today are his former classmates. Many Ukrainian soldiers have family in Russia. I have been trying to get this through. This war is a Civil War of Slavic brothers where one wants to join the enemy camp while the other is trying to prevent it.
NATO does not have a battle tested army
Incorrect, they have practiced on goat herders for 20 years
@@BobParrIncr Yes, they have never fought a peer opponent.
It would be more accurate to say NATO didn't have a battle tested army before 2022. NATO's armies have been battle tested in Ukraine, and they have been defeated.
Far more battle tested in every aspect than anything Russia fielded prior to the invasion of Ukraine.
Praktice on ground seems to show that the eastern tanks are not only cheaper, but also better than western. Same with the tactics. We could slowly dispose of this stereotypes about east and west.
All impressive about our army is the budget. No bang for the buck. Too many big bellies feeding their gluttony on it.
I learned walikin DC amongst things. Politicians, contract mediators, stock holders, manufacturers. All too much inbreeding and feeding themselves and their own on our taxes. Result, others can neitralize our budget for a fraction. Like Johan Cruyff said, I never seen a bag of money score a goal.
Russian Tanks are made for War -------------- US - NATO Tanks are made for Profit.
It always was a myth. In every real peer to peer conflict eastern tanks whiped the floor with western tanks and hilariously it can be traced back to worldviews: The individualistic west produces very few high price, high tech, high maintenance tanks with long production times while the collectivist east produces a lot of cheap, low tech, reliable tanks that can be churned out in weeks. The former is great for showrooms and powerpoint presentations but on the ground the later matters more. It's basically product vs tool.
McGregor said it.... America doesn't have the best military..it just has the most expensive !
Filling the pockets of the Zionists...
NATO doctrine without air superiority is not NATO doctrine. Lack of air power was one of the main causes of failed 2023 summer ofensive.
They couldn't possibly gain air superiority over Russia's air defences. NATO and the US are expeditionary (invasion) focused. Russias is defence focused.
Mwah. Air support or artillery support makes little difference. As long as the target gets hit. Support is support. Air support more mobile and more precise on the first shot in my experience. Not against a Russia also a possible higher write off. I refused to sign up for fighter pilot ad airforce said you are going there, against my preference, and left. For sure I am not flying that "budget" plane against no Russians. Even if I had defined them af my enemy. But I see my enemies elsewhere. Those dividing Ukranian brothers into a war.
Dejanzatezalo. I agree, but it's literally criminal that the West and Ukraine ignored this known fact and attacked anyway!
But Davidov said Ukraine had air superiority
@@Samuel-hd3cp Summer offensive was pushed by V. Nuland. Valeri Zaluzny was against offensive.
Ukraine has lost this fight. They need to take the lose and move on with a peace treaty.
In order to negotiate they would have to offer something in return. At this point they can only capitulate and hope for the best possible outcome out of bunch of terrible outcomes
@@loopmantra8314 Which makes it all the more imperative that they offer a surrender now. In 2022 the price was to be Finlandized. NATO had to be kicked out, its army disbanded. In return the Donbass would stay Ukrainian as semi autonomous areas. Now the price is Finlandization, its army disbanded and the 4 oblasts that the Russians currently occupy to become part of Russia in full. If they wait any longer Kharkov and Odessa will probably have to be ceded as well. But overall I do not think Russia wants to occupy all of the Ukraine. Especially the non-Russian parts are far more trouble to Moscow then they're worth. But Finlandization, NATO to be kicked and its army disbanded are key. Russia does not want a repeat of Minsk or Istanbul. They want the Ukraine to cease being a problem to them.
@@ChaptermasterPedroKantor-kv5yw You summed it up perfectly, although I believe that any peace negotiations will also include Russian control of Odessa. Not part of the Russian Federation, but permanent Russian councils etc. Ukraine will then have use of Odessa, but under Russian terms and cost
@@ChaptermasterPedroKantor-kv5ywwhat do you think about sumy?
It's a Ukrainian speaking region, but it's right on the periphery of Moscow. If NATO can house offensive nuclear capable missile launchers, this will all have been for naught?
@@mezzuna NATO will not be allowed to house missiles there. NATO will not be allowed to remain in the Ukraine, the Ukraine will never be part of NATO. Unless the Ukraine wins the war of course. Which seems highly unlikely. So NATO will be kicked out as part of a peace settlement.
One of the only positives of working a night shift where I live, is being able to watch a Willy OAM video within 10 minutes of being posted.
Shouldn't you be working.
Same
@@cannowuppass8214 No because i work monday afternoon till tuesday morning. I keep my sleep scheduale mostly the same on the weekends.
@@cannowuppass8214wise up I'm gona tell your mummy
@@cannowuppass8214 ok karen
Willy...you're lack of information is astounding. Soviet doctrine? Soviets never used "human wave". Last time such tactic as employed was when the musket was "the thing" in infantry wars. Basically, Napoleon times. There was SOME in WW1. But since, nobody used human wave attacks, because it's effing stupid.
You should REALLY study real history, and see that Soviet losses in WW2 were not due to human waves attacks (there weren't ANY), but due to ARTILLERY, TANKS and AIRPLANE BOMBS.
It was a LARGE SCALE war, with TENS OF THOUSANDS of artillery pieces on both sides on front sections not longer then 400 km.
That was the reason of Soviet and German losses...not the stupid propaganda of "human waves".
The reason the weapons you mention killed so many is because there were so many targets in the same place.
Same as in the Korea war. Meat waves aren't some Somme-style charge but a steady stream of soldiers constantly attacking the designated area, and anyone thinking so is just regurgitating Kremlin propaganda.
Ukrainians said last week that Russia today has 2 times the number of tanks, than they had 3 years ago at the start😮😮😮
Yeah probably, they weren't expecting Ukraine to give them a good fight. They brougt them to the front/repaired some old tanks only after they encountered substantial resistance.
@@Jatzki🤣🤣 don't stop the turbo cancer booster..... it start to work on you!!!🥴🤡
good biped.... good biped!!!
@@jean-rochdion4898What? That is probably the least readable youtube comment I have read this year. I have no idea what you're trying to say. (🤣🤣🤣)
@@Jatzki Yes and no. What has bene building since 2022, is a real invasion force. Our media, officials etc have said "full-scale" invasion and many others terms, with various estimated forces from 90 to 160k. That is not an invasion force, period. I don't know what Russia is up to but there are massive build up of forces a long that whole border.
Willy says that the west has more advanced weapons than Russia.
NATO cant even use ther F16 and F35 is getting jammed and all radar and comunication stops working. and it is the same with ships and tanks. Good luck NATO. 😂🤣
Why would Russia ever consider "peace talks" with the current regime in Kyiv? Every peace talk in the last 10 years starting with the Minsk Agreement were a cover for flooding the country with weapons & NATO trainers. Until a few weeks ago Zelensky rejected every overture of a cease fire. Hell, they had a "peace summit" in Burgenstock last month and pointedly refused to invite Russia 😂. How do you have a peace summit without talking to the party you're trying to have peace with?
Besides, Ukraine is under martial law with a head of state whose term of office has expired & refuses to hold elections.
It doesn’t seem that russias reason is nato moving west. Finland now is nato and Russia says they don’t care.
I think Zeihan got it right 8 years ago. Look up “the Russian grab” by Peter Zeihan.
Pure logistical social and economical factors predicting the invasion years before it happened.
As you keep saying for year after year.
Why bother with peace talks when you're on a roll.
If the Ukrainians aren't able to recognise what's good for them then that's their loss.
Right?
@@Justdont693one fight at a time .
Russia doesn’t need two fronts right now.
We can only speculate what Russia thinks.
@@concernedaussie1330 according to the Russian grab. Ukraine is the most important location.
Basically every country has invaded Russia through a few gaps over there. Even Canada. Yup Canada. In 1918.
It has less to do with politics than either side says.
It’s simple population, geographical, and economic factors.
Really you should watch “the Russian grab” by Zeihan.
@Justdont693 thanks.
I take zihion's word's with a strong dose of salt.
He definitely has some interesting points, but he's playing the game & playing us at the same time.
I may have seen it . But I'll look into it.
Oh Willy coping again. NATO weapons are not better. You know it's simple, artillery is king, and Russia has always had the advantage over Ukraine and the West when it comes to artillery. The most casualties come from artillery let alone those TOS1 rockets.
Western artillery is objectively better than the Russian artillery: it shoots further, faster and with better precision while demanding less crew per piece.
The problem is as always the quantity. Western forces didn't keep the old scrap around when getting new toys as it costs too much to store in conditions that are acceptable. Soviet and later Russia kept it around, as they don't care if the odd piece blows up due to lack of maintenance or bad ammunition. Just occupational hazard.
@@johanmetreus1268 It can be better, more precision but what about shells:
-------------------------------------------- Quantity/year -------------------- Source ------------------------------ Date
USA ------------------------------------- 450,000/year ------------------- Reuters ----------------------------- July 19, 2024
EU -------------------------------------- *550,000/year-------------------- Business Insider -------------- Jul 8, 2024 *(will be 1,000,000/year)
Russia ------------------------------ 3,000,000/year ------------------- NATO/CNN estimation ----- March 11, 2024
Russia 2nd source------------ 4,500,000/year ------------------- Radio Liberty --------------------- July 08, 2024
I thought Ukraine had a over 900,000 man armed forces 18 months ago , what happened for Ukraine to lose over 500,000 combat capable men over the last 18 months.
Why don’t the fanboys answer this question?
Gone, reduced to bone meal.
20 F16s and 6 Pilots. This in reality becomes 2 Pilots and 6 F16s, at the ready.
So for entire Ukraine ypu have 2 F16s at most at any time.
Limited to a handful airfields who are all well known, under constant surveillance and in missile range.
You seem to miss the point.
Ukraine, not being supplied by the Ruscists, now have new sources of supplies.
This is fairly plain I would assume.
@@user-ul9dv2iv9s I am hitting point perfectly. The reality of those F16s makes such a small difference that it's practically not worth the trouble to prepare airfields for them. The Ukrainians could have seen more use with 20 C130s, or 1000 pairs of thermal sights.
@@Sufferingzify don't fancy yourself much don't you.
Are you also unaware that the vastly superior side is struggling to achieve their basic aims.
We're talking about Donetsk after starting this 10 years ago.
@@Sufferingzify Considering the dude keeps regurgitating the same old dumb talking points, i'm affraid we have a severe case of copium overdose. I suggest simply leave the patient to rest...
Pro-Ukrainian accounts are running out of cope
Meanwhile Willy is not...
He will keep coping even after the war is over 😂
Russia just got Mig 31 upgraded, even old ones have better radar than F16, AFAIK Mig has one if not the best radar that exist in any fighter airplane...
and then they have hypersonic air to air misille ,that has 2 or 3 times the range of any western air to air missile.....
that alone tells you how succesfull these low quality Ukrainian pilots will be in their F16
Yeah
Watch your words NAFO bots are lurking around,and you just hurt their feelings 😂😂😂
Censore bots
Yep. "Budget" multipurpose fighter plane. Lovely dogfighter way beyond the age of dogfighting. Range of sight and attack is what mathers. Not worth much against an opponent like Russia.
ORC
Their mobilization failed. They don`t have enough soldiers especially experienced ones.
They can't even give good training to privates let alone NCOs and Officers....that takes YEARS !
Ukraine has fighter jets already, so why does everyone think f16s will be a game changer? 6 pilots are not going to do much at all.
What are the odds that the F16s will be all shot down or they never go in service.
The latter is a big possibility. I’m sure they’d pull the last 2 out if they lost a third of them
@@Notcomingbaxk I think pretty high.
The US lost nearly 10,000 warplanes, helicopters and UAVs during the Vietnam War and Vietnam was a 3rd World country.
The problem with the military industrial complex in the West is that it is set up to make a profit and not to be effective and in this globalised age, the West offshored their industrial base decades ago.
If this war has shown anything, it is that Western exceptionalism has proven to be overrated in the military, economic and diplomatic spheres.
Well said
Vietnam was 3rd world, but they were backed by the Soviet and Chinese war sponsors. That said, your point is valid, western military might is obviously not superior in all situations. Especially in cases where your enemy is using comparatively cheaper weapon systems but still achieving attrition like in Vietnam. On the other end of the spectrum Iraq was a walkover (just talking military campaign, not the post war mess) So its all about the context e.g. sponsors, economy, citizen support, and geography etc. that dictates how effective your tech will be. Following the Ukraine war, its obvious that Russian and Chinese tech is relatively on par with Western tech. But thats unsurprising, Russia has been highly tech advanced even in soviet times - i mean we are talking about a country with an enviable space programme
Russia isn't using Soviet doctrine. Not even something close to it...
Why is Ukraine without men if they claim they aren’t suffering massive casualties while Russia is?
Indeed, why would that be. Only under 40k ukie casualties out of the million+ army and how many 5? mobilizations. It's almost as if one needs to multiply that number by about 15 to get to the real casualties.
@@bluikkso In war not all soldiers are on frontlines or actively fight. Most of mobics do infrastructure. I agree they must lost big chunk of "fight force" But it could be much less than you are saying.
Ukraine always had larger number of soldiers on the ground vs Russia, from start of the war till now. Ukrainian numerical advantage became almost overwhelming by autumn 2022, when they had their largest victories. Althou russia now has over 6 times more population, ukriane had 8 years non stop mobilization prior the war plus 2 years after.
Ukraine has lost nearly 1 million men plus casualties.Fact
@@Asset88 And more than 10 million emigrations
Willie Willie Willy Russia did not lose 200 thousand soldiers
Western tanks have show to be no better in war , often worse because they r to heavy and made to have to much of a complicated maintenance system...
Certainly a game changer for any future prospective buyers.
And their size aswell, Not to mention the amount of fuel they consume
Western weapon systems are designed to make money for the military industrial complex, not win wars
Zelensky will wake up one morning and realize this is not a movie.
If Ukraine is in desperate need of reinforcements …. That means they’ve lost a lot of men … 100’s of thousands I’d say
Russians have FABulous tactics, no doubt
I think the fact that Russia puts senior and experienced commissioned officers on the battlefield was missed.
But ukranian best brigades cancel to train ppl by infamous NATO training, they say that people who has 0 war experience try to train soldiers
I never read that Russia is losing 50 soldiers a day on the other hand i regularly reading the Ukrainian losses of more than 100 a day
That's because they can't spare the manpower anymore.
They bragged about how great NATO training was when they pushed back the Russian invasion in the north and held in the south for months they were over the moon that they weren't crushed militarily.
Now they are forced to kidnap people off the street and deploying them with 12 days of training NATO training is suddenly useless.
Standard protocol for Ukraine right now is to blame their allies for every one of their failures.
Redeploy a lot of your ammo to defend Bakumet lose the city anyway, The west didn't resupply us fast enough.
Announce a major offensive months before it occurs and refuse to abandon the idea after your own generals tell it won't work. The west didn't give enough tanks.
Stupidly carry out an amphibious landing you can't support the west should have given us jets.
Less than a 3rd of the pilots you sent to be trained on the F-16 were deemed competent enough to fly. The west is delaying deployment.
Russian conscripts are not fighting on the battlefield. You know it Willy, don't you?
You should talk to Andrei Martinov about the Russian military vs the west. You’d be surprised
Andrei won't have the patience with Willy lol
RUS has x5 more artillery, more drones, more tanks, and almost complete air dominance. Where's the logic in saying that RUS is losing more soldiers?
Remember when the western propaganda medias said that Avdiivka wasn’t that important? 😬🤣
Having a leeching bureacracy class is never a good idea
Yep. Bureaucrat should be socialist, not elitist. Serve the peoples, not elitist. Why we see state debts rising and the few gaining wealth. Not the ones that hunger. Au contraire. We pay. We fight. They benefit. Who are our actual enemies posing to represent what and who they do not? Deceivers. Not me. I have been around. Met the lot mask off. Deceiving them to mistake me for what I am not. Acting a little stupid with it. Getting confirmed what I was thought.
I wonder how the comedian is feeling now?
Quite fine considering his personal bank balance. In fact I think he's hoping to increase it a bit more before he rides off into the sunset
Every Ukrainian brigade that has its own telegram or social media channel talks about the new recruits that have been placed there since the last mobilisation, so how can you state what has happened to them. The answer is they have been sent to the front to patch up under-strength companies. The 2 brigades that were trapped though not encircled who went to Ivanika has about 100 men, Some groups report there are only 5 left alive or uninjured.
Ukraine is now using ground drones after laughing at Russia's own ground drones. Ukraine is now using the Volachansk industrial unit.
Where do you get the idea that China and Russia have only publicly owned arms manufacturers?
What China and Russia have is a skilled workforce and engineers. The West can build industry but cannot find anyone to man them/The uSa has to use oaps to help them build shells. Apprenticeship went away in the west years ago.
Russia has tested a new air defence system that has destroyed a Ukrainian MIG 540 km away. which will prove problematic for F16's. as for The Russian airforce not doing well it did destroy the Ukrainian air force at the start but people who claim that sending planes in when your opponent has a strong air defence system is correct.
Willy, you have become a bit obstinate with your "attrition warfare doctrine" stuff. Not a particularly enlightening pathway to follow for understanding what is going on. Leaving that alone for now, however, here is something to consider about the F-16. It would be great if someone on this channel or one of your contacts could sort out the social background of the Ukrainian F-16 pilots and pilot candidates. I could be flat wrong about this, but jet sales by the United States to many foreign air forces has really been a sale of polo ponies. Scions of the rich get to fly them. Flying the jets, for the most part and with some interesting exceptions, has to do with giving rich young men a thrill -- a scarf around the neck, bragging at the bar while waving top gun hands. They are not expected to risk the pilots' lives.
Remember Gonzalo Lyra 🙏
F16s arent gonna do $hit
Provide the top corrupt a taxi out. Against a Russia, no I don't think they van add much but slurpimg up budget or be quick write offs.
Yes, they will, they will make more aces out of russian pilots.
Even fighter bomber said this, if you have 12 pilots, it means you only have 3 to 6 combat pilots, a pilot is not a robot and each flight mission takes a toll on the pilot. So I do not think Ukraine will have enough pilots to change the outcome of the battle field
Zelensky is going to end up BEGGING for a peace deal very soon.
I wouldn’t be surprised if actually outlived his usefulness and disappears.
As you said "you fail to understand" perhaps people exactly know what's actually happening.
If people know about the losses that's why they are not willing to go to the front being annihilated.
Have you thought that perhaps, the number of losses are not exaggerated.
Recently a Ukrainian Su-27 was shot down by a Russian Sukhoi from a distance of 271 km, much further than the missiles available to F-16.
Here comes another F-16 delay excuse ....
Willy very quickly gets out of his depth and then talks cope and nonsense. Ukrainenato is demonstrably losing thousands weekly .even the MSM are acknowledging Ukrainenatos massive losses.Russia withdraws when it’ needs to while Kiev defending territory for PR purposes. As for NATOs much vaunted superiority regarding weapon systems. Again not Bournemouth out on the battlefield
Победа России, Россия победит
❤❤❤❤❤❤ZoV
After a constant growth in tactics and capacity, now I have the net impression that russian military forces are so superior to Nato/Ukraine forces that they are using the entire campaign as a huge training field for their arsenal.
No more hurry to arrive in Kiev, to get more territories ASAP. They take their time. They have zero doubt about the final result of the special. operation.
Today a SU-35S destroyed a Mig 29 at 213 km of distanca with a new AA missile. 213 Km of distance! Unbelievable!
Today they completed the tests for a new Iskandar missile with... 1000 Km of range! Unbelievable!
Today they completed the relocation of new S400 air defense missile in Crimea with more than 400 Km of range! Unbelievable!
The Stoltenberg-boys still believe that Russians piss in their pants when they hear words like "Nato" or "F16"...
I’ve seen a lot of Russian RUclips videos about this exact situation and they say it’s a shit show but they have learnt how to adjust adapt and change even Wagner guys being very honest about the situation in bakhmut and he didn’t shy away from what was good what was bad and it’s drones they are very powerful the amount they have learnt and put into training is really starting to change the game especially with how the move on dug in positions the idea of warfare has changed dramatically since the start of this war
I feel like we're all waiting for Willy to catch up and fully admit what's going on.
Every so often he makes a leap and accepts reality, but at the end he can't fully commit.
Still in denial stage, a bit like the Z-man..
Willy stop saying Soviet doctrine,,, Ukraine is also Soviet unless the war is between Russia and NATO..if your counter offensive was modern NATO doctrine then you are far from knowing how to fight
Ukrainian tank commander to his german trainer:
- Herr Flick, what do we do when we face a russian minefield?
- Are you stupid, Ivan? You drive 200m. to the right and go around it.
- But the minefi.....
- I SAID DRIVE AROUND IT!
"A Russian state TV presenter has said that Alaska belongs to Russia, reviving an effort pushed by propagandists throughout the war in Ukraine that Moscow could seize the U.S. state.
During a broadcast of the Russia-1 program 60 Minutes, propagandist Olga Skabeyeva referred to the U.S. state as "our Alaska", Agentstvo, an investigative Russian site, reported on Sunday."
You kip calling the Russians Soviet. Is there a reason Or is it old habits
Kip is chicken in Dutch. Think you ment keep.
@@tjallingdalheuvel126 sorry I’m Danish so excuse me
Why did the world think that Russian military technology was still stuck in the Cold War era? They have shown the whole world how far they have come and it’s impressive how quickly they can adapt to different situations on the battlefield
A few months ago Willy seemingly was starting to see the light of truth. Then some time ago he not only erased what little progress he had, he doubled down on the uкrо-propaganda.
I'm starting to suspect he got some funding from NАFО.
@@rikitourangi815 i have no idea but it is very impressive how the Russian army and government have flowered during war and sanctions. I’m Danish and I support the Russian Federation and President Putin
That's all well and good, but it's not NATO fighting it's Ukraine, and it's not the Soviets, it's the Russians.
Zelensky didn't try to prevent the conflict through diplomacy because he lacks honor and integrity. In 2014 there was a coup. Soon after, there was a massacre in Odessa (dozens of people were burned alive), Ukrainian fire fighters stood nearby, did nothing and watched them burned alive. A civil war broke out due to the rise in ethnic tensions. For 8 years the Ukrainian military was indiscriminately shelling civilians living in Donbass. If Zelensky honored the Minsk agreement and pledged neutrality, none of this would have happened. The 8 year civil war would have ended and Donbass would have remained part of Ukraine. War is the ultimate failure of diplomacy. Zelensky, Poroshenko, Merkel and Hollande admitted that Ukraine had no intention to honor the Minsk agreements. Who didn't want peace? Who advised against the 2022 peace talks in April? Hint: someone visited Zelensky in Kiev at that time Russia's national security was compromised once NATO began to expand eastwards. Russia clearly stated that Ukraine joining NATO was a red line (November 2021) and unfortunately this concern was never taken seriously. The Russians openly stated: if nothing changes, we will be forced to act in order to defend our national security. Enhancing the national security of one country at the expense of another is unacceptable. The Russians have legitimate security concerns. 20th September, 2021: Ukraine launched military drills with US and NATO. NATO is not a defensive alliance. NATO illegally bombed Yugoslavia (a direct violation of the U.N. Charter). We should never forget what they did to Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq etc. Who blew up the pipeline causing an environmental disaster? Zelensky banned all opposition and arrested a leading priest. Zelensky tried to invoke article 5 under false pretenses. Remember the incident in Poland, 2 Polish civilians in a border village were murdered by a Ukrainian missile. Ethnic Russians living in Ukraine were treated as subhuman. Their language and culture was being oppressed. Poroshenko said, "Our children will go to schools and kindergartens - theirs will hide in the basements". Russians will never forget the 2014 Odessa massacre. The whole world needs to know about it. Why was Denis Kireev eliminated? He was a member of Ukraine's negotiating team during the peace negotiations. He wanted to help his country. Ukraine has a hit list. They target artists, journalists and ordinary citizens. Hundreds of children are on this list. 13 year old Faina Savenkova was placed on this list. Pink Floyd's Roger Waters is on this list. Jimmy Dore (American stand - up comedian, podcaster) and Aaron Maté (Canadian writer and journalist) are on this list. There is evidence that Ukrainian troops have been indiscriminately shelling civilians in Donbass (they used petal mines and targeted areas where there was no military presence). The Azov troops trapped in the Azovstal steelworks in Mariupol used human shields. They refused to allow civilians to leave despite of humanitarian corridors being present. Russia held a proposed cease fire in order for the civilians to leave, but Azov would not allow the civilians to leave. Ukraine has committed many acts of terrorism (car bombs and other forms of assassination). Darya Dugina (journalist) R.I.P. The first terrorist attack on the Kerch bridge killed the truck driver and the individuals in the adjacent car (innocent civilian victims). The second terrorist attack on the Kerch bridge killed two parents and severely injured their young daughter. Everything above can be fact checked and verified.
That's your opinion
All soldiers in the armed forces should be tried and convicted, according to you and your reasons, they are all guilty of something that put another at risk.
Why didn’t these f16’s defeat the Afghan talabans????? I don’t think they will help win the war.
Willie the Russians use deep battle attrition warfare. Heavy utilisation of artillery to soften enemy positions, keep up pressure with multiple small scale operations using mechanized forces (using tanks as mobile feild guns, and rotary as CAS). Once one operation bears fruit, deploy the reserve and rush b suka as deep as possible till stiff resistance is met. Then repeate process. On an operational level avoud encirclements and use culdrens to attrite enemy forces in a fire pocket with artillery.
They used this in ww2; the meat waves described were a myth.
You really gotta stop listening that cos playing armchair general history legends.
Echo chambers mate.
By the way, talking of meat waves.
The advantage of vastly superior numbers have been a constant Russian tactic since the great Northern War.
Sweden simply melted before the Russians.
Consider this.
The only confirmed fatalities by Mediazona are those provided by Prigozhin about Bakhmut.
They are as follows.
19.5k.
17.5k prisoners out of 50k recruited.
Infer what you can from that.
Remember. 1 year ago.
Also remember that this almost caused an overthrow of Putin.
You can't seriously ignore the ww2 penal brigades and the current Storm V and Storm Z brigades.
Putin isn't going to throw away an obviously workable tactic whether large or small units are utilised.
HEELLLLOOOOOOOOOO!
I was a US Marine and i went to boot in late 2005 and even back then having grown up around my foster dad that had been a udt guy in the navy in Korea i thought our training was bad and was gonna cause casualties and we had practically no house to house skills at all a lot of swat tactics that dont work in a active warzone. Felt like we were trained by cops instead of fighters
😂😂😂Willy what is technologically advanced?
You keep saying this, most of military equipments in the west aren't technologically superior, they are just expensive and unnecessarily complicated.
I always said, as long as Russia has a counter for everything you have then you are not more superior. I'll call nato superior once they have a counter to the hypersonic misslles and or make their own
Technologically advanced means shovels and washing machines. You’re welcome 😆
Russia has already done this exact same thing in WW2. Same thing,same place, same people,,, God bless you Russia ☮️🙏🇷🇺
F-16 deployed 50 years ago.
While I keep hearing about the training requirements needed for the aircraft, I haven't heard much about the training and logistics support for the maintenance of the aircraft. I'm sure it will consist mainly of "Contractors", but it's much more involved than I think most people realize.
F16 takes off , Russia tracks F16, ...... F16 lands , Russia destroys F16 on the tarmac ?
Willy,are you saying the Russians are losing hundred of thousands in this attritional war,while having gross superiority in manpower, artillery ,missiles, drones ? In that case what would you estimate Ukrainian losses at . Would it be Ukrainian losses of 30,000 like Zelensky had estimated ? Seriously now, you can't be suggesting that Ukrainian losses are less than Russian ?
According to the Russian Ministry of Defense.
Since the beginning of the special military operation, 631 aircraft, 278 helicopters, 28647 unmanned aerial vehicles, 556 anti-aircraft missile systems, 16714 tanks and other armored combat vehicles, 1392 multiple rocket launchers, 12535 units of field artillery and mortars, 24178 units of special military equipment have been destroyed..
Reports say RU just shot down a Mig 29 at some 250 km distance with a new air to air, which is apparently unprecedented range. So about all the F16 will be able to tackle is air defense in western areas.
Did you get greeting cards from Russian soldiers from the western side in Chasiv Yar? Yeah, they crossed that kanal and pumping.
What is NATO doctrine???
Do you mean a war with total dominance against countries that do not have aviation, satellites and a tenfold advantage in infantry and equipment?!
We can then say that Russia used NATO doctrine against Georgia in 2008 or Russia against ISIS in Syria.
When they talk about comparing the doctrines of NATO and Russia, they usually say that NATO has fewer losses, but I would like to see how NATO doctrine works in conditions of trench warfare without total air dominance...
"Amateurs talk strategy, professionals talk logistics" General Omar Bradley USA (WW2). Russia is outproducing Ukraine (and NATO) in both Arty (King of battlefield), Missiles (Kinzal vs ATACM), SAM (S-300/400 vs Patriots) and many other systems. Like most wars, there is a learning curve for soldiers/officers and it takes years sometimes when new weapons (Drones/FAB/other) are added to the battlefield. Thanks WillyOAM.
Imagine NATO having access to soviet doctrine and still getting it wrong. Jfc.
Worse tanks? Willy, when the T-64 came out, it was much better than anything the West really had. The T-72 started out as a cheap mass production model, but eventually superseded the T-64. The T-80 and T-90 tanks are also fairly good tanks. The Soviets had good tanks.
Willy my mate...Looking good as always :) Keep up the good work mate :)
He would look even sharper with a red nose and painted face.
@@manichaean1888😂😂😂😂