@@michaelparsons2225 you must be paid for your disinfo. Star trails around Polaris prove the stars are close and rotate above us. Stars are not visible in high altitude weather balloons.
Vid mentions pole star was used for navigation as far back as 5th century AD, but chola kings were already navigating using pole star in SE asia during 3ooBC
@@Gamer_2047_ The Northstar never moves, all stars above rotate around it In a 365 day pattern. That’s how come stars could be used for navigation. We are not moving.
You forgot to mention one thing. The ancient Greek word for bear is arkos. That's where we get the arctic from. You are in the area of the bear constellation.
Since we are hurtling through space, how come Polaris holds its precise position, given we are all moving relative to each other and at different speeds, different masses etc. One would expect that no star would occupy a position like Polaris, but should move just like everything else? Can somebody explain why Polaris always holds it position?
There are at least a couple of factors at play. One is that Polaris and the Earth are embedded in the same milky way galaxy and each is revolving around the galaxy's center roughly once every 240 million years. (We've made about 1/4 or a revolution since the mass extinction of dinosaurs!) While the two objects speeds aren't likely to be exactly the same, the distance between them is so enormous any change in the relative positions of the two objects is nearly undetectable over short time periods of time, even with enhanced astronomical instruments. For example, image viewing two airplanes traveling the same speed with each traveling directly overhead, one at 3,000 ft, the other at 30,000 ft.* That plane nearer you would appear to be moving much faster relative to you and horizon and would quickly disappear from view. The other would be visible for much longer, and appear to creep across the sky. (I've noticed this best when a plane is at cruising elevation, 30,000+ ft and the sun, near the horizon, is gleaming off it's fuselage creating a pinpoint of light in the twilight sky.) Multiple that effect by the 6 trillion miles that polaris is from earth and you get the idea; even if the relative distance is changing, you'll never see it in your lifetime, or even a thousand more life times.
@@paulhamilton3026 yes Paul, I would have (and did) take that "too distant to observe" explanation as adequate, every day of the week and twice on Sunday. But No, it's the tip of the iceberg. You have to start with the massive local problems with the heliocentric model and when you put aside our natural revulsion to looking into anything so stupid as "flat level earth", you soon see the many problems. Up to 2019, I could not be convinced to even look at anything coming from the flat earth community, it was only because of some recent events that got me looking in 2020. I am not a person to accept "theory" only, especially when I have already accepted what I knew to be reality, (of course only a dummy thinks the earth is flat) so I set about doing my own measurements to really look carefully and purely scientifically, at all of the proofs for both sides. It's overwhelming, we have been lied to for at least 500 years and the globalist elites who run the money system, all our institutions, from education to science and media etc, are hiding that the earth is a closed system. The implications of this are staggering and the illusion of democratic government is the first to knock you off your feet when you understand it's all theatre for the sheep. Rather than try argue over distant hard to prove factors, go straight to the heart of the issue. If we are living on a ball earth, find the evidence for the curve? Let that be your starting point. Isolate the angular resolution limits of the human eye, via optical equipment and modern sensors and take measurements. I have one friend who is a life long astronomer, who refused to accept any of the arguments against the heliocentric position, even when we used a 1000 lens plus a 1.4 extender on 1.5x sensor, giving us 2100mm of reach, he was convinced that we were observing refraction, "a mirage" of the target, until we attached an infra-red sensor, we could all clearly see the heat signature of the "mirage" only then did he accept the curve calculations were absolutely wrong and he sought to investigated the whole issue with a different attitude. Today he is hard core flat earth, because he dug deep into all the issues, because you cannot discuss your way to the truth with short conversations. It's very simple, we are on a flat plane and we are NOT moving. I don't expect you to take any of what I am telling you on face value, because in 2019, I certainly wouldn't have. I would automatically be scouring my mind for examples and arguments that the FE proposition was simply wrong. The problem is we are basing our arguments on heliocentric lies and theory that cant be easily proven wrong without experimentation and scientific investigation. This is key to solving this problem. I do not know what is beyond that part of the Earth that we are not allowed to visit, Antartica/North Pole. I do not know what exactly is locking down our atmosphere, but I know for sure its not "gravity" I do not know what is preventing us from leaving low earth orbit, other than what is written in biblical texts/ancient times, we are enclosed in some kind of firmament. I first thought that the calculation for the size of the earth (its bigger than we thought) had to be the problem, but no matter what we allowed for, it soon became obvious that there is NO curve. When you STOP believing in the magical properties of the theory of gravity, the floodgates open and the heliocentric model falls apart. There are so many proofs that we are not on a spinning ball, when you "get them", its a major head-F that we never saw it before. You have to spend the time to watch the videos and properly interrogate the arguments. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence (NASA) and others, to support that we are being lied to on an industrial scale for a very long time. A lot is going on behind the scenes right now, and it is directly related to the FE revelation. I believe that major changes for humanity are just around the corner as a result of us learning for the first time in perhaps 500 years, exactly where we are, and maybe even who we are. Kind regards.
More like indoctrinating people across the plane. All of the stars rotate around Polaris, which is directly above the north star at all times. How does that work if we’re traveling in 4-directions about 4,500,000,000 miles per year? Well, it doesn’t.
@@mikesammartano That doesn't explain the tilting. If the earth tilts around the sun then then the position of polaris should change significantly. It doesn't. Check any 30+ day timelapse from any position on earth and you will see it never ever ever moves. Not an inch. It's the center, right above the north pole...because the north pole is the center.
First of all, shout out to our eyes for having the ability to see 433 Light-years away. I give thanks to Our Ancestors for laying down the foundation for All of Us to pick up where they left off.
We can't see light-years away, these are lies. The stars are small and close in our sky; they disappear at high altitudes like in weather balloons. And all the other stars rotate around Polaris in fixed and repeating patterns - never changing. Earth is not moving.
@@JacobLM42 Not really. The inverse square law of light proves that a light’s brightness diminishes to a quarter every time you double the distance. With this one fact, you can unwind the lies of our so-called solar system and alleged planets as well as alleged distant stars.
If the earth is moving in 4 different directions simultaneously. Night and day, orbiting the Sun, the Sun orbiting the Galaxy and the legendary wobble. How does the Polaris star stay in the North Pole area year after year century after century with all of these movements?
Theyre claiming it moves 1degree every 70years but it was named polaris on a second century lol where it would be 25 degrees off Axis lol.ttuth od it never moves singlehandedly destroying heliocentrism
@Andy Salek star trail photography shows polaris moves,, it's not centre. And history shows Thuben was previously the closest star to the north Celestial pole. And history shows we navigate using both north and south Celestial poles. Pole stars are irrelevant, what's relevant is north and south Celestial poles, True north and true south.
@@michaelparsons2225 it makes a tiny circle and it does it for centuries. it means it doesnt move. nobody would call it a polaris if it moved 1 degree every 70 years. thats all i need to know to know its been there and it will. this would be one of good reasons not to trust history that much
@Andy Salek polaris does move, it's not centre and polaris is irrelevant. What's relevant is north and south Celestial poles, True north and true south
Thanks! great video but I noticed a calculation mistake at 00:58 Polaris is about 433 light years away from earth. The speed of light is 300,000 km/sec(186,000 mile/sec), our fastest spaceship speed 8 km/sec(5 miles/sec), which means light is ABOUT 37,200 times faster than our spaceship. If it takes 433 years for the light to travel the whole distance, it would take us 433 multiplied by 37,200. so approximately 16 million years!
Surprised you did not mention that Polaris is not just a single star but is a triple star system. It just looks like a single point of light when viewed by our unaided 'naked' eyes.
@@RobertTozzi Suggest you do your own research. But just in case : "Although appearing to the naked eye as a single point of light, Polaris is a triple star system, composed of the primary, a yellow supergiant designated Polaris Aa, in orbit with a smaller companion, Polaris Ab; the pair is in a wider orbit with Polaris B. The outer pair AB were discovered in August 1779 by William Herschel, where the 'A' refers to what is now known to be the Aa/Ab pair."
@@favesongslist I'll disagree with this opinion. Polaris, like all stars are not burning balls of gas in an alleged void of space, it is a pulsating orb of light, apparently energetic in nature as well as close and small. The idea of stars proposed by "science" fails when they disappear from sight in high-altitude weather balloons.
@@RobertTozzi What you said is moronic, speculative, based on the gap of your knowledge which you filled in with your superficial hypothesis. The conclusion that you came up didn't come from the method of empiricism. You didn't account for confounding variables in your hypothesis. One can easily disregard this as a rambling of a fool. No facts nor evidence.
How does it manage to stay in the same spot considering we are on a spinning ball circling the sun while at the same time chasing sun through the cosmos?
The stars are going around earth and around the north star :) this is what i believe. Both theories can be ''proven'' and would work IN THEORY. One is more logical and less complicated and also is true to your own perspective tho
447 light * and you are not seeing right now , you are seeing what it was 447 years ago , like the sun we are seing how it was 8 minutes ago i remember i studied this when i was kid so either you dont have any education or you are just stupid
Also since its on the NP all the other stars rotate around it. Same with the southern star. But you would have to be on Antarctica to see it. Also just a note, you can't see it if you live south of the equator. All in all, polaris is my favorite star.
@En busca de la verdad Look it up where? A flat earth video? The southern star is called polaris Australis and it's the closest star to the south Celestial pole, not centre, closest visible star to centre. Magnitude 5.4 it's not bright enough to use for navigation, the reason we use the southern Cross to locate centre, true south
Ok but according to your big bang space theory the whole universe is spanding, at the same time the earth is a constant circuit around the sun, at the time i thought the earth tilted on its axis causing summer/winter equally on both hemispheres, surely there must been some change in position since it was first noticed thousands of years ago.
There is no way the Earth is a ball spinning at 1,000 mph. Whoever still believes that after watching any timelapse of the stars is blinded by indoctrination.
@@aman-qj5sx oh really? Were you there thousands of years ago to observe it's change? If we are indeed spinning like a merry-go-round, then WHY AM I NOT DIZZY??? Furthermore, how can you even make that analogy on a ball earth theory? Merry-go-rounds are flat.
@@acidvat3052 your theory would assume that the sun is in directly associated and connected gravitationally with the stars. Also, it assumes the sun is 94.5 million miles away which, to this day, has not been proven. THEORETICAL SCIENCE IS NOT SCIENCE - IT'S A RELIGION!!!
Growing up, the song "Right Down the Line" by Gerry Rafferty was popular. He sings that the Northern Star is the "Brightest star that shines". It drove me nuts because I knew that was a lie. Nobody else cared though
Also according to wikipedia, the resolution of your eyes is about an arcminute. So no not really noticeable . en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minute_and_second_of_arc
It's always in the same position, right over the North Pole. All of the stars and so-called planets (aka wandering stars) rotate around it, in regular repeating patterns (ie the zodiacal stars). We're supposed to believe that it only looks that way and we're supposed to believe that we're travelling 4.5 billion miles per year.
@@mikesammartano Hey man you might be interested in this I saw North star is also the center spinning point of the universe called "Pole Star", here is the explination and more. facebook.com/VedicCosmology/posts/the-pole-star-dhruvaloka-is-the-central-pivot-of-the-universal-planetary-systems/1545225325785394/
Bingo, you found the right question. Is there really a south pole? We won't really know for sure because of the Antarctic Treaty. I bet we won't ever find another stationary star like Polaris because the earth is possibly flat
@@BaysideSoundz wrong little flerf , every year people go to Antarctica , people even life and work there .. explain why you can’t see Polaris on the Southern Hemisphere ?
the tilt is fixed in one direction, so when we’re on one side of the sun the north pole is pointing away from the sun (which would make it winter in the northern hemisphere) and on the opposite side of the sun the north pole would be pointing towards the sun (which would make it summer in the northern hemisphere) seasons happen because the earth is tilted *and* we orbit the sun, not just because of the tilt
I may be wrong and I would love for the internet to let me know if I am please talk but shouldn't there be a similar star that we can see from South pole🤔
Look to the left of Polaris and slightly upward to see the star Thuban. It is located halfway between the bend of the Big Dipper’s handle and the bowl of the Little Dipper. “Thuban was the North Star 4,800 years ago at the time of the ‘Old Kingdom’ in Egypt-a period when most of the pyramids were built,” Teske said. “The exact pole has crept from Thuban to its present position near Polaris and now is headed toward gamma Cephei, which will be the North Star in about 2,000 years.
having intention not to insult but to use words as precise as I can - until it is not forbidden for us to take a look at any astronomical chart (star map) ever found - whether it be Babylonian/Akkadian/Chaldean, Egyptian, Chinese, Greek, Arabic or even from cave art of cave people - we can easily recognize constellations and there is no even a room for serious discussion of nonsense that Polaris (star on the tip of a handle of lesser "stove/cup") circled around another star Thuban, which unknown and requires very good sight to be even seen by naked eye, but one day Thuban began circling around Polaris, and Sun, Moon and stars followed) So no, this is a weak and easy disprovable lie, not supported by any historical text or drawing, and contradicts every single of them from different continents, cultures, authors and texts - so why you even accepted such unbased lie when read it/ heard it?
@@JacobLM42 except the North Star still lines up with the air shaft of the pyramid of Giza and didn’t move from the view hole on the Georgia guide-stones for 40 years. There’s no evidence that it ever moved.
@@RobertTozzi No it doesnt, and yes it did move inside the hole if you had mesured it, dude stop this abosolutely stupid BS some random con man Flerf Daddy put into your brain, its laughable. ruclips.net/user/shorts8gS5puV8-aI
@@RobertTozziit “hasn’t moved” for 40 years because the axial precession cycle takes 20,000 years. we aren’t ever going to see a difference in our lifetimes because it happens at a scale so much larger, 743.4 human generations larger to be exact
Quick question why doesn't Polaris move it stays stationary in the sky, would that mean from over 400 light years away Polaris is mirroring the exact wobbles and spins earth is doing? Seems kind of hard to believe.
It's because earth rotates west to east if the earth rotates north and south you would only see the star sometimes. Take a dot a put it on your roof rotate yourself 180 degrees and tell me when you look up you can still see the dot hence north start looking north is basically looking up from the earth.
I read the hyperlink that you put in the comments section under mylady22's comment. That is pretty cool 😎 it's like heaven, but for the angels(guardian and death). Thank you for you being you❣️
Can someone who lives in South Argentina 🇦🇷 tell if they can see the Polaris or north star. If can't this should means earth is NOT FLAT! I'll translate in Spanish
@Robert Tozzi Polaris Australis isn't bright, it isn't centre and it's not used for navigation because it isn't bright enough. The reason we use the southern Cross. Polaris is bright and also not centre, if there's no Polaris there's no north? Is that your flat logic?
I noticed the Big Dipper is right outside my window by my bed although right now as I’m commenting this it is very cloudy so Polaris is not very bright, but I can find it
because it is look at david weiss videos called flat earth dave or rob skiba or jeranism show also uncommon ground on you tube with shawn and wes blaze
It's because earth rotates west to east if the earth rotates north and south you would only see the star sometimes. Take a dot a put it on your roof rotate yourself 180 degrees and tell me when you look up you can still see the dot hence north start looking north is basically looking up from the earth.
Hi! I wonder how Polaris can always be above or north of earth if our solar system and Polaris orbit around the center of the galaxy 🤔 wouldn't this make them change positions quite often so that it wouldn't be north anymore?
Over time the 'North' star will change. Polaris did not become the North Star until about AD 500. It will get closer to straight above the Earth’s north pole until sometime in 2102. Then it will move away again. It will be the closest star to the pole until about AD 3000.
@@SealedservantWhy is all the Planets spherical. And 1 Planet has Rings Visible on a telesocpe. Also how does a Lunar Eclipse work on a flat earth model? If we live in the flat earth The moon will have a diffrent phase on diffrent places on the Flat earth.
@@jadi2058 honestly in my opinion, any eclipse would be the same. The shape of the earth shouldn’t change that but I know a video that can explain better than me. As for other planets, one of the most common questions. They’re there but not as they’re told. They’re not these giant balls in space millions of miles away, they’re just stars or lights in the sky that are small and local and revolving around earth
@@Sealedservant But For the Planets Why Do they Move more Diffrently than any other Stars on the Flat Earth. This wont explain retrograde Motion on a Flat earth. For example this Video of how Planets work on a globe ruclips.net/video/FtV0PV9MF88/видео.html&t But Is there a Video Explaining How Lunar Eclipse or any Source you have. Because That is a major hole in a flat earth
Polaris can be seen all the way to the 45 parallel. All stars rotate around Polaris. Polaris is in the same place in the sky during they day as it is at night but can only be seen at night. This is the verifiable proof the Earth is flat and stationary
Polaris can be seen all the way to the equator, but it CANNOT be seen south of the equator. Southern hemisphere stars appear to circle around the south celestial pole, NOT, Polaris. This is verifiable proof you don't know what you're talking about.
@Robert Tozzi Star trail photos from the equator show polaris at the horizon, do you disagree with how latitude works also? Imagine tine polaris visible from 45 degrees south and the huge sun vanishes in less distance. Your stupid logic debunks your fantasy. And basic research will prove you're wrong,,, but you gotta keep lying.
@@tezz2698 maybe billions, or trillions. Just listen to Neil Degrass and *just believe.* Whatever you do, don't think for yourself or you might start looking into what BS this is. All stars rotate around Polaris in the sky above us. Zodiacal stars rotate around it once per year, and wandering stars each have unique and repeating patterns in this "carousel" in the sky. We are not moving at all.
@@RobertTozzi Then how do you explain the differences between modern astronomical maps and ones from 2000-3000 years ago? Or the fact that stars in the Southern hemisphere rotate around the South Pole?
@@ericdavis219 its funny because they all attack as if we are less than human. Or as if they are more than human for thinking that type of way. Maybe in some time line or different space, we could all get together and openly talk about Truth without ridicule. Hoping you and others are meditating and praying to see what lies beyond our body complexes. Time is of the essence until it no longer is!!
@@rvnn4957 you mean the plasma moon which is a mirror image of our continents, known and unknown? And our plasma sun portal which is another construct that the parasites created to breach the toroidal field of our crater on a much larger earth? Draw a horizon line. There you go. Ten points if you used a ruler. Fly in an airplane and then tell me why it’s flat as far as the eye can see. Why does a pilot never correct for the curve?Or architects? Imagine the twin towers looking like chopsticks in a bowl of rice. Please do some research, any amount will affirm that things are not the way we were taught. Check out gogvlemaste, Radiation Matters, and others. See the Hereford map. Listen to the interviews of Admiral Byrd. I have a star map. It’s a book that has a round disk of all the constellations on it. You turn the disk and voila! New season and new stars in the view finder. It’s a flat disk. For all the calculations and all the balls supposedly spinning, a flat piece of paper seems to do just fine to explain the sky. We were taught in school that our perceptions were off and there were these optical illusions that needed to be explained by complex mathematics. I call bs on that. Just free your mind from the programming and really consider why the bottom of a cloud is flat and why a ship on the horizon is a tiny ship and not just the mast sticking up. Don’t be afraid to look with your own eyes. Don’t be afraid to question. There are worse things than to be ridiculed for holding views different than the masses. Not questioning authority is one of them.
This guy wants his ball and don't want to let it go. Polaris doesn't move because the earth ain't. It's electromagnetic aether with the sky clock moving.
It moves every night in a small circle just like other stars, because even though it's relatively close it's still about 1 degree of the north celestial pole.
@@RobertTozzi You can see the southern celestial pole from the entire southern hemisphere, although it's very close to the horizon if you are just south of the equator.
@@fromnorway643 if you could, it would refute the globe model, and as you couldn’t have a northern and southern pole star always staying in the same place if we’re traveling through the universe at 1,200,000 miles an hour. You can’t even have Polaris always staying over the North Pole if we’re traveling at that speed. If you are going to say the stars are so far away, look up the inverse square law of light.
@@RobertTozzi You have absolutely _no_ understanding of interstellar distances! The distance to Polaris is about *_13 million times_* larger than the width of the Earth's orbit around the Sun. Claiming that the apparent position of Polaris should change throughout the year is like claiming that the apparent position of a distant mountain should change if looking at it with your left eye and then your right eye. Our Sun would at most be visible from about 50 light-years away, but some giant stars are hundreds or even thousands of times brighter than our Sun. The giant star *_Rigel_* in Orion is about 100,000 times brighter, so using the inverse square law tells us that it would be visible from up to √100,000 x 50 = 15,800 light-years away.
@@fromnorway643 at allegedly 93 million miles away, the sun is 8 light minutes away. According to the inverse square law, at 16 light minutes, it would be a quarter of the brightness; at a light hour, it would be 1/56th of the brightness; a light day away, it would be 1/32,400 th of the brightness. So no, we’re not seeing anything from light days away, definitely not light years away. That’s impossible.
@@michaelparsons2225 If you haven't understood my question, do notice that currently accepted scientific explanation relies on Earth that is not tilting at all, and fits all our observations perfectly fine. Now, what makes you think your inability to understand that somehow makes solstice's some kind of a proof that Earth do tilts, although we never observed such tilting.
@max5250 I live in Australia and I see the south pole star, the closest star to the south Celestial pole, also known as sigma octantis. It's not a very bright star, the reason we use the southern Cross to locate centre, TRUE SOUTH. My latitude is 45 degrees south and the south Celestial pole is 45 degrees. It's how latitude and navigation works in the south. And summer solstice I see the sun rise 23 degrees south east and set 23 degrees south west. Tropic of Capricorn is 3000 kilometres to my north. The flat earth sun would always be to my north, it isn't.
"it can tell us about where we are right now, and about where we want to go." Beautifully stated!
It confirms globe rotation
@@michaelparsons2225 you must be paid for your disinfo. Star trails around Polaris prove the stars are close and rotate above us. Stars are not visible in high altitude weather balloons.
Vid mentions pole star was used for navigation as far back as 5th century AD, but chola kings were already navigating using pole star in SE asia during 3ooBC
@@Gamer_2047_ The Northstar never moves, all stars above rotate around it In a 365 day pattern. That’s how come stars could be used for navigation. We are not moving.
@@RobertTozzi😂
You forgot to mention one thing. The ancient Greek word for bear is arkos. That's where we get the arctic from. You are in the area of the bear constellation.
It is arktos actually. U missed a t (Άρκτος)
North Star, This always been a part of my career as a seafarer ☝️🔥
ever traveled towards the Antarctica?
Since we are hurtling through space, how come Polaris holds its precise position, given we are all moving relative to each other and at different speeds, different masses etc. One would expect that no star would occupy a position like Polaris, but should move just like everything else? Can somebody explain why Polaris always holds it position?
The earths axis changes tilt significantly as well causing the seasons the changes supposedly too🤔
The question you shoud be asking is why the Polaris is not visible rom the southern hemisphere.
@@StarSprangledBanner Because the earth is a sphere and at the Southern Hemisphere you're facing in the wrong direction?
There are at least a couple of factors at play. One is that Polaris and the Earth are embedded in the same milky way galaxy and each is revolving around the galaxy's center roughly once every 240 million years. (We've made about 1/4 or a revolution since the mass extinction of dinosaurs!) While the two objects speeds aren't likely to be exactly the same, the distance between them is so enormous any change in the relative positions of the two objects is nearly undetectable over short time periods of time, even with enhanced astronomical instruments.
For example, image viewing two airplanes traveling the same speed with each traveling directly overhead, one at 3,000 ft, the other at 30,000 ft.* That plane nearer you would appear to be moving much faster relative to you and horizon and would quickly disappear from view. The other would be visible for much longer, and appear to creep across the sky. (I've noticed this best when a plane is at cruising elevation, 30,000+ ft and the sun, near the horizon, is gleaming off it's fuselage creating a pinpoint of light in the twilight sky.)
Multiple that effect by the 6 trillion miles that polaris is from earth and you get the idea; even if the relative distance is changing, you'll never see it in your lifetime, or even a thousand more life times.
@@paulhamilton3026 yes Paul, I would have (and did) take that "too distant to observe" explanation as adequate, every day of the week and twice on Sunday. But No, it's the tip of the iceberg. You have to start with the massive local problems with the heliocentric model and when you put aside our natural revulsion to looking into anything so stupid as "flat level earth", you soon see the many problems. Up to 2019, I could not be convinced to even look at anything coming from the flat earth community, it was only because of some recent events that got me looking in 2020. I am not a person to accept "theory" only, especially when I have already accepted what I knew to be reality, (of course only a dummy thinks the earth is flat) so I set about doing my own measurements to really look carefully and purely scientifically, at all of the proofs for both sides. It's overwhelming, we have been lied to for at least 500 years and the globalist elites who run the money system, all our institutions, from education to science and media etc, are hiding that the earth is a closed system. The implications of this are staggering and the illusion of democratic government is the first to knock you off your feet when you understand it's all theatre for the sheep. Rather than try argue over distant hard to prove factors, go straight to the heart of the issue. If we are living on a ball earth, find the evidence for the curve? Let that be your starting point. Isolate the angular resolution limits of the human eye, via optical equipment and modern sensors and take measurements. I have one friend who is a life long astronomer, who refused to accept any of the arguments against the heliocentric position, even when we used a 1000 lens plus a 1.4 extender on 1.5x sensor, giving us 2100mm of reach, he was convinced that we were observing refraction, "a mirage" of the target, until we attached an infra-red sensor, we could all clearly see the heat signature of the "mirage" only then did he accept the curve calculations were absolutely wrong and he sought to investigated the whole issue with a different attitude. Today he is hard core flat earth, because he dug deep into all the issues, because you cannot discuss your way to the truth with short conversations. It's very simple, we are on a flat plane and we are NOT moving. I don't expect you to take any of what I am telling you on face value, because in 2019, I certainly wouldn't have. I would automatically be scouring my mind for examples and arguments that the FE proposition was simply wrong. The problem is we are basing our arguments on heliocentric lies and theory that cant be easily proven wrong without experimentation and scientific investigation. This is key to solving this problem. I do not know what is beyond that part of the Earth that we are not allowed to visit, Antartica/North Pole. I do not know what exactly is locking down our atmosphere, but I know for sure its not "gravity" I do not know what is preventing us from leaving low earth orbit, other than what is written in biblical texts/ancient times, we are enclosed in some kind of firmament. I first thought that the calculation for the size of the earth (its bigger than we thought) had to be the problem, but no matter what we allowed for, it soon became obvious that there is NO curve. When you STOP believing in the magical properties of the theory of gravity, the floodgates open and the heliocentric model falls apart. There are so many proofs that we are not on a spinning ball, when you "get them", its a major head-F that we never saw it before. You have to spend the time to watch the videos and properly interrogate the arguments. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence (NASA) and others, to support that we are being lied to on an industrial scale for a very long time. A lot is going on behind the scenes right now, and it is directly related to the FE revelation. I believe that major changes for humanity are just around the corner as a result of us learning for the first time in perhaps 500 years, exactly where we are, and maybe even who we are. Kind regards.
Another extremely good video. Mr. Sammartano, you are doing a great service in educating people around the globe. Thank you so much.
More like indoctrinating people across the plane. All of the stars rotate around Polaris, which is directly above the north star at all times. How does that work if we’re traveling in 4-directions about 4,500,000,000 miles per year? Well, it doesn’t.
No he not. The Globe is a lie and you praising him for what? Regurgitating Nasa lies. That ain't hard..Research Flat Earth
From my country it's a alone star( there aren't many stars around it) that shines very brightly, so it's very easy to tell for me(:
Just saw this star outside my window and it was really bright. Like top 10 ive seen.
If the earth tilts and wobbles then how come Polaris never moves it’s position?
It does actually appear to move...a bit.
earthsky.org/astronomy-essentials/north-star-movement
@@mikesammartano Love the video but I think you should've explained why Polaris seems to be stationary while all of the other stars move.
@@WDE1121 🔝of a dome🤔
No. The earth IS tilted. It wobbles and changes only every 20000 years
@@mikesammartano That doesn't explain the tilting. If the earth tilts around the sun then then the position of polaris should change significantly.
It doesn't. Check any 30+ day timelapse from any position on earth and you will see it never ever ever moves. Not an inch.
It's the center, right above the north pole...because the north pole is the center.
First of all, shout out to our eyes for having the ability to see 433 Light-years away. I give thanks to Our Ancestors for laying down the foundation for All of Us to pick up where they left off.
Praise be to God for blessing us with those eyes.
We can't see light-years away, these are lies. The stars are small and close in our sky; they disappear at high altitudes like in weather balloons. And all the other stars rotate around Polaris in fixed and repeating patterns - never changing. Earth is not moving.
@@RobertTozzi D u m b a s s.
@@JacobLM42 Not really. The inverse square law of light proves that a light’s brightness diminishes to a quarter every time you double the distance. With this one fact, you can unwind the lies of our so-called solar system and alleged planets as well as alleged distant stars.
If the earth is moving in 4 different directions simultaneously. Night and day, orbiting the Sun, the Sun orbiting the Galaxy and the legendary wobble. How does the Polaris star stay in the North Pole area year after year century after century with all of these movements?
Theyre claiming it moves 1degree every 70years but it was named polaris on a second century lol where it would be 25 degrees off Axis lol.ttuth od it never moves singlehandedly destroying heliocentrism
@Andy Salek star trail photography shows polaris moves,, it's not centre.
And history shows Thuben was previously the closest star to the north Celestial pole.
And history shows we navigate using both north and south Celestial poles.
Pole stars are irrelevant, what's relevant is north and south Celestial poles, True north and true south.
@@michaelparsons2225 it makes a tiny circle and it does it for centuries. it means it doesnt move. nobody would call it a polaris if it moved 1 degree every 70 years. thats all i need to know to know its been there and it will. this would be one of good reasons not to trust history that much
...because, to put it simply, THIS SHIT IS CAP!!!
@Andy Salek polaris does move, it's not centre and polaris is irrelevant.
What's relevant is north and south Celestial poles, True north and true south
I came up with the same trick of using those 2 pointer stars from the Big Dipper on my own as well.
Thanks! great video but I noticed a calculation mistake at 00:58
Polaris is about 433 light years away from earth.
The speed of light is 300,000 km/sec(186,000 mile/sec), our fastest spaceship speed 8 km/sec(5 miles/sec), which means light is ABOUT 37,200 times faster than our spaceship.
If it takes 433 years for the light to travel the whole distance, it would take us 433 multiplied by 37,200. so approximately 16 million years!
It’s not any light years away.
You can't see Polaris from the Southern hemisphere 💯✨💎✨ that's such a gem
In Hinduism, we call it Saptharishi mandala....we knew about it from our Vedic times...And Polaris was/is called DruvaNakshatra
I'm curious 2 know what was said about Polaris - could u plse te us - thanks!! 😊
@@lindyixchelsedona270 For that you need to look into 'Bhumandala' model of vedic universe rather than the planet earth model.
Surprised you did not mention that Polaris is not just a single star but is a triple star system. It just looks like a single point of light when viewed by our unaided 'naked' eyes.
Yea, right. That’s not what we observe at all.
@@RobertTozzi Suggest you do your own research. But just in case :
"Although appearing to the naked eye as a single point of light, Polaris is a triple star system, composed of the primary, a yellow supergiant designated Polaris Aa, in orbit with a smaller companion, Polaris Ab; the pair is in a wider orbit with Polaris B. The outer pair AB were discovered in August 1779 by William Herschel, where the 'A' refers to what is now known to be the Aa/Ab pair."
@@favesongslist I'll disagree with this opinion. Polaris, like all stars are not burning balls of gas in an alleged void of space, it is a pulsating orb of light, apparently energetic in nature as well as close and small. The idea of stars proposed by "science" fails when they disappear from sight in high-altitude weather balloons.
@Merlin So you’d like to assign a label, so you don’t have to consider what I said?
@@RobertTozzi What you said is moronic, speculative, based on the gap of your knowledge which you filled in with your superficial hypothesis. The conclusion that you came up didn't come from the method of empiricism. You didn't account for confounding variables in your hypothesis. One can easily disregard this as a rambling of a fool. No facts nor evidence.
Fantastic very well explained video. The graphics are especially helpful. Thanks very much!
How does it manage to stay in the same spot considering we are on a spinning ball circling the sun
while at the same time chasing sun through the cosmos?
We don't move enough for there to be a noticeable difference, Polaris is so far away it doesn't matter if we're on one side of the sun or the other
You’re coming millions of quadrillions of light years away versus like 8.3 light minutes not light years
@@alfamuzjaksakitomiznadpros5182 Were not moving at all.
@@rengokukyojuro294 Maybe in your mind
The stars are going around earth and around the north star :) this is what i believe. Both theories can be ''proven'' and would work IN THEORY. One is more logical and less complicated and also is true to your own perspective tho
1,500,000 light years away , and we see it with the naked eye 🤣
It's not 1,500,000 light years. It's 447 light years which would take us 1.5 million years to get to since we can't travel at the speed of light..
447 light * and you are not seeing right now , you are seeing what it was 447 years ago , like the sun we are seing how it was 8 minutes ago i remember i studied this when i was kid so either you dont have any education or you are just stupid
well explained thank you for this
Also since its on the NP all the other stars rotate around it. Same with the southern star.
But you would have to be on Antarctica to see it.
Also just a note, you can't see it if you live south of the equator.
All in all, polaris is my favorite star.
There's no souther star. Look it up if you don't believe me.
@En busca de la verdad
Look it up where? A flat earth video? The southern star is called polaris Australis and it's the closest star to the south Celestial pole, not centre, closest visible star to centre.
Magnitude 5.4 it's not bright enough to use for navigation, the reason we use the southern Cross to locate centre, true south
Ok but according to your big bang space theory the whole universe is spanding, at the same time the earth is a constant circuit around the sun, at the time i thought the earth tilted on its axis causing summer/winter equally on both hemispheres, surely there must been some change in position since it was first noticed thousands of years ago.
The north star changes every few thousands of years. It was Thuban about 5000 years ago. And about a few more thousand years later it would be Vega.
There is no way the Earth is a ball spinning at 1,000 mph. Whoever still believes that after watching any timelapse of the stars is blinded by indoctrination.
@@aman-qj5sx oh really? Were you there thousands of years ago to observe it's change? If we are indeed spinning like a merry-go-round, then WHY AM I NOT DIZZY??? Furthermore, how can you even make that analogy on a ball earth theory? Merry-go-rounds are flat.
@@voborny Earth is a sphere... Look at the night sky 6 months apart and it will be completely different because you are on the other side of the sun.
@@acidvat3052 your theory would assume that the sun is in directly associated and connected gravitationally with the stars. Also, it assumes the sun is 94.5 million miles away which, to this day, has not been proven. THEORETICAL SCIENCE IS NOT SCIENCE - IT'S A RELIGION!!!
Growing up, the song "Right Down the Line" by Gerry Rafferty was popular. He sings that the Northern Star is the "Brightest star that shines". It drove me nuts because I knew that was a lie. Nobody else cared though
Indeed!
Polaris is just a 2nd magnitude star and the 48th brightest according to the Wiki article "List of brightest stars".
Thank you soooooo much for this information. I'm basing a presentation on the north star and loved the information.
Very imformative! Hi btw can you make a video about bowen's reaction series? Love from Philippines :))
Great suggestion!
Damn,now that i know how to find latitude,i feel like bear grylls
Thanks. Very clear, and informative.
Is there a noticeable difference in the position of Polaris depending on where the earth is in her orbit around the sun?
Parallax 7.54 ± 0.11 mas
According to wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaris
Also according to wikipedia, the resolution of your eyes is about an arcminute. So no not really noticeable .
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minute_and_second_of_arc
It's always in the same position, right over the North Pole. All of the stars and so-called planets (aka wandering stars) rotate around it, in regular repeating patterns (ie the zodiacal stars). We're supposed to believe that it only looks that way and we're supposed to believe that we're travelling 4.5 billion miles per year.
I love it, it's the most useful thing I knew today thanks 😁 alot 😁😁😁
Happy to hear that!
@@mikesammartano Hey man you might be interested in this I saw North star is also the center spinning point of the universe called "Pole Star", here is the explination and more. facebook.com/VedicCosmology/posts/the-pole-star-dhruvaloka-is-the-central-pivot-of-the-universal-planetary-systems/1545225325785394/
@@keithhollett1979
Very wrong
just like polaris (north star) is there any star in south standing still ?
Bingo, you found the right question. Is there really a south pole? We won't really know for sure because of the Antarctic Treaty. I bet we won't ever find another stationary star like Polaris because the earth is possibly flat
@@BaysideSoundz wrong little flerf , every year people go to Antarctica , people even life and work there .. explain why you can’t see Polaris on the Southern Hemisphere ?
@@BaysideSoundz and Polars actually does move . And sigma octancis is Polaris S equivalent in the South Pole , thanks for proving the Globe 😎
very well explained. thanks
This is the best video ever!It's also very informative.
We have seasons... the earth tilts. How is it still pointing towards polaris?
tilt is the same
No, it doesn't! It's flat and you've been played by the public school system!
@@brightwinter9334 🤡
the tilt is fixed in one direction, so when we’re on one side of the sun the north pole is pointing away from the sun (which would make it winter in the northern hemisphere) and on the opposite side of the sun the north pole would be pointing towards the sun (which would make it summer in the northern hemisphere)
seasons happen because the earth is tilted *and* we orbit the sun, not just because of the tilt
Here in Nepal polaris is useless because we have very high mountains.
I may be wrong and I would love for the internet to let me know if I am please talk but shouldn't there be a similar star that we can see from South pole🤔
I came looking for the same thing
But there is no answers
Plant earth model we use is suspicious
Look to the left of Polaris and slightly upward to see the star Thuban. It is located halfway between the bend of the Big Dipper’s handle and the bowl of the Little Dipper. “Thuban was the North Star 4,800 years ago at the time of the ‘Old Kingdom’ in Egypt-a period when most of the pyramids were built,” Teske said. “The exact pole has crept from Thuban to its present position near Polaris and now is headed toward gamma Cephei, which will be the North Star in about 2,000 years.
having intention not to insult but to use words as precise as I can - until it is not forbidden for us to take a look at any astronomical chart (star map) ever found - whether it be Babylonian/Akkadian/Chaldean, Egyptian, Chinese, Greek, Arabic or even from cave art of cave people - we can easily recognize constellations and there is no even a room for serious discussion of nonsense that Polaris (star on the tip of a handle of lesser "stove/cup") circled around another star Thuban, which unknown and requires very good sight to be even seen by naked eye, but one day Thuban began circling around Polaris, and Sun, Moon and stars followed)
So no, this is a weak and easy disprovable lie, not supported by any historical text or drawing, and contradicts every single of them from different continents, cultures, authors and texts - so why you even accepted such unbased lie when read it/ heard it?
Its the wobble of the earth axis there slightly move the celestial pole.
@@JacobLM42 except the North Star still lines up with the air shaft of the pyramid of Giza and didn’t move from the view hole on the Georgia guide-stones for 40 years. There’s no evidence that it ever moved.
@@RobertTozzi No it doesnt, and yes it did move inside the hole if you had mesured it, dude stop this abosolutely stupid BS some random con man Flerf Daddy put into your brain, its laughable. ruclips.net/user/shorts8gS5puV8-aI
@@RobertTozziit “hasn’t moved” for 40 years because the axial precession cycle takes 20,000 years. we aren’t ever going to see a difference in our lifetimes because it happens at a scale so much larger, 743.4 human generations larger to be exact
why would you mirror the earth
and you put the bear on the dipper backwards, put the head where the tail should be
very informative, thank you 😀
I saw the big dipper last week
THis video was excellently made and animated. How did you do it?
Star walk 2 app
Quick question why doesn't Polaris move it stays stationary in the sky, would that mean from over 400 light years away Polaris is mirroring the exact wobbles and spins earth is doing? Seems kind of hard to believe.
Because the earth rotates on an axis, and polaris is above the axis, the north star never appears to move.
It's because earth rotates west to east if the earth rotates north and south you would only see the star sometimes. Take a dot a put it on your roof rotate yourself 180 degrees and tell me when you look up you can still see the dot hence north start looking north is basically looking up from the earth.
@@scripulance.1901 I think you did a much better job explaining it than I did lol
@@SevannM shit
@@scripulance.1901 shit too
Thank you
Wow.. This Became Philosophical
super informative thanks!
Thank you sir.
I read the hyperlink that you put in the comments section under mylady22's comment. That is pretty cool 😎 it's like heaven, but for the angels(guardian and death). Thank you for you being you❣️
Thank you😊
but why people see it from south of Australia
They don't.
Where do we want to go?
Stellar!
Please could you tell me the name of the program you use to look at polaris ?
Can someone who lives in South Argentina 🇦🇷 tell if they can see the Polaris or north star. If can't this should means earth is NOT FLAT! I'll translate in Spanish
Can someone in south Argentina find a south star that's stationary as Polaris? If can't that means earth is not a round ball.
I'm in Australia and I see the south pole star
this is not escalation ; hercu CORRECT
Very informative.
Thanks. Very informative
why was the earth globe mirored in the intro ?!
Fantastic video
Cool! How to navigate by stars in southern hemisphere?
I made my own video on this recent conjunction... cloudy night. :-)
thanks a lot
Thank you
Love you
well done
My science teacher told me to watch it
so how did people navigated in southern hemisphere?
earthsky.org/favorite-star-patterns/how-to-use-southern-cross-to-find-south-celestial-pole/
Omg.May I use this for a video?
Polaris: north star
Meanwhile in another universe
Northaris; pole star
Polaris Australis the opposing pole star.
@@michaelparsons2225 Many speculate that this "southern pole star" doesn't even exist. Got any proof of this claim?
@Robert Tozzi what if it doesn't exist? Does it mean there's no south Celestial pole and no true south?
What relevance is a pole star?
@Robert Tozzi
Polaris Australis isn't bright, it isn't centre and it's not used for navigation because it isn't bright enough.
The reason we use the southern Cross.
Polaris is bright and also not centre, if there's no Polaris there's no north?
Is that your flat logic?
@@michaelparsons2225 can you prove a pole star is over the south pole with stars rotating around it?
how are satellites getting to these places faster then earth and the earth had a head start of millions of years
You mirrored the Ursa Major, its head is in fact its tail.
I noticed the Big Dipper is right outside my window by my bed although right now as I’m commenting this it is very cloudy so Polaris is not very bright, but I can find it
Once you find the North star: Omae wa mou shindeiru!
But some people says earth is flat 🗿
because it is look at david weiss videos called flat earth dave or rob skiba or jeranism show also uncommon ground on you tube with shawn and wes blaze
if it doesn't move then it is a fixed point and the stars spin like a mobile in a baby bed. No rotation folks.
Everything is much closer than we've been led to believe by the synagogue of satan
very good for children
exellent
It's because earth rotates west to east if the earth rotates north and south you would only see the star sometimes. Take a dot a put it on your roof rotate yourself 180 degrees and tell me when you look up you can still see the dot hence north start looking north is basically looking up from the earth.
Hi! I wonder how Polaris can always be above or north of earth if our solar system and Polaris orbit around the center of the galaxy 🤔 wouldn't this make them change positions quite often so that it wouldn't be north anymore?
Over time the 'North' star will change. Polaris did not become the North Star until about AD 500. It will get closer to straight above the Earth’s north pole until sometime in 2102. Then it will move away again. It will be the closest star to the pole until about AD 3000.
Polaris exemplifies an upwards direction..?
There are several other planets of our Solar System they've different North Stars.
This is why Kenshiro is the mightiest.
Ok...so if we are on a tilted axis and are wobbling around it...how in the world is it always north
Because we are not on a tilted axis and the earth is not a globe, let that sink in
@@SealedservantWhy is all the Planets spherical. And 1 Planet has Rings Visible on a telesocpe. Also how does a Lunar Eclipse work on a flat earth model? If we live in the flat earth The moon will have a diffrent phase on diffrent places on the Flat earth.
@@jadi2058 honestly in my opinion, any eclipse would be the same. The shape of the earth shouldn’t change that but I know a video that can explain better than me.
As for other planets, one of the most common questions. They’re there but not as they’re told. They’re not these giant balls in space millions of miles away, they’re just stars or lights in the sky that are small and local and revolving around earth
@@jadi2058 ruclips.net/video/TuKsMlANPxk/видео.html
@@Sealedservant But For the Planets Why Do they Move more Diffrently than any other Stars on the Flat Earth. This wont explain retrograde Motion on a Flat earth. For example this Video of how Planets work on a globe ruclips.net/video/FtV0PV9MF88/видео.html&t But Is there a Video Explaining How Lunar Eclipse or any Source you have. Because That is a major hole in a flat earth
all is about location
Polaris can be seen all the way to the 45 parallel. All stars rotate around Polaris. Polaris is in the same place in the sky during they day as it is at night but can only be seen at night. This is the verifiable proof the Earth is flat and stationary
Polaris can be seen all the way to the equator, but it CANNOT be seen south of the equator. Southern hemisphere stars appear to circle around the south celestial pole, NOT, Polaris. This is verifiable proof you don't know what you're talking about.
Liar
I have heard this too, but the observatories where this was possible were supposedly shut down.
@Robert Tozzi
Star trail photos from the equator show polaris at the horizon, do you disagree with how latitude works also?
Imagine tine polaris visible from 45 degrees south and the huge sun vanishes in less distance.
Your stupid logic debunks your fantasy.
And basic research will prove you're wrong,,, but you gotta keep lying.
@@RobertTozzi ruclips.net/video/T3jus582qGc/видео.html
do the seasons affect this at all? because aren't the seasons mainly caused by earth tilting? and if the earth tilts, wouldn't this throw it off??
The change in earth's tilt happens over millions of years.
@@tezz2698 maybe billions, or trillions. Just listen to Neil Degrass and *just believe.* Whatever you do, don't think for yourself or you might start looking into what BS this is. All stars rotate around Polaris in the sky above us. Zodiacal stars rotate around it once per year, and wandering stars each have unique and repeating patterns in this "carousel" in the sky. We are not moving at all.
@@RobertTozzi Then how do you explain the differences between modern astronomical maps and ones from 2000-3000 years ago? Or the fact that stars in the Southern hemisphere rotate around the South Pole?
@@tezz2698 I don't. I can't go to the south pole to verify this claim.
@@RobertTozzi but you can visit the southern hemisphere.
In which year he was discovered
T his video's is amazing 👍😘😁😉❤️😘😂👍. I. Like this. Videos
So how the F is Polaris able to stay aligned to earth northpole noting that our entire solar system is encircling the Sagittarius A?
Because the distances and timescales involved are enormous.
It's not. The accepted model is wrong.
People are just too retarded or scared to speak up.
Earth is flat and the space shuttle didn't go anywhere. Polaris is closer than you think.
🤣🤣🤣how about the other FLATnets insolar system? How about the flatmoon? Flatsun? And your FLATbrain?
Yep I know I like to come to these videos to study the mind control on the masses
@@ericdavis219 its funny because they all attack as if we are less than human. Or as if they are more than human for thinking that type of way. Maybe in some time line or different space, we could all get together and openly talk about Truth without ridicule. Hoping you and others are meditating and praying to see what lies beyond our body complexes. Time is of the essence until it no longer is!!
@@rvnn4957 you mean the plasma moon which is a mirror image of our continents, known and unknown? And our plasma sun portal which is another construct that the parasites created to breach the toroidal field of our crater on a much larger earth? Draw a horizon line. There you go. Ten points if you used a ruler. Fly in an airplane and then tell me why it’s flat as far as the eye can see. Why does a pilot never correct for the curve?Or architects? Imagine the twin towers looking like chopsticks in a bowl of rice. Please do some research, any amount will affirm that things are not the way we were taught. Check out gogvlemaste, Radiation Matters, and others. See the Hereford map. Listen to the interviews of Admiral Byrd. I have a star map. It’s a book that has a round disk of all the constellations on it. You turn the disk and voila! New season and new stars in the view finder. It’s a flat disk. For all the calculations and all the balls supposedly spinning, a flat piece of paper seems to do just fine to explain the sky. We were taught in school that our perceptions were off and there were these optical illusions that needed to be explained by complex mathematics. I call bs on that. Just free your mind from the programming and really consider why the bottom of a cloud is flat and why a ship on the horizon is a tiny ship and not just the mast sticking up. Don’t be afraid to look with your own eyes. Don’t be afraid to question. There are worse things than to be ridiculed for holding views different than the masses. Not questioning authority is one of them.
@@kellenegems98 You summed it up well. Critical thinking goes a long way.
The earth is not a Ball
You have to be among the most stupid people ever to be a flattard.
@@JacobLM42They could have meant it's not completely round. Earth is round, but flat at the poles.
@@MrJuvefrank Nothing live upside down.
The Earth is not a perfect sphere since its polar diameter is 0.3 % less than its equatorial diameter.
@fromnorway643 Your kins says it is an oblate spheroid that looks chubbier.
Can you find it in Florida?
Yes.
Depending on your exact location, it will be between 25 and 30 degrees above the northern horizon, highest in the northern part of the state.
Polaris is currently the UPWARD star of ascending. The beam of light, the narrow gate.
I know what? Big Dipper means the group of seven stars, in the shape of a bear, that points out the way to the star Polaris, (North Star). Yes.
And the southern Cross?
Video: why do we care about Polaris?
Me who got sent this video: umm, idk why do u care abt Polaris-
1.5 million years away... then should we better get started?
433 light years, does that mean it if the star died today we would know know about it for another 433 years.
Correct
🙏🏻
If it's to the north how come Australia can see it?
They cant d u m b a s s.
This guy wants his ball and don't want to let it go. Polaris doesn't move because the earth ain't. It's electromagnetic aether with the sky clock moving.
It moves every night in a small circle just like other stars, because even though it's relatively close it's still about 1 degree of the north celestial pole.
Mike Sammartano
Please ensure you explain that there are 2 Celestial poles not just one.
You really confused the flat earthers.
BS story. Please prove the southern polestar is fixed over the alleged south pole. Oh yea, you can't bc you can not go to the supposed south pole.
@@RobertTozzi
You can see the southern celestial pole from the entire southern hemisphere, although it's very close to the horizon if you are just south of the equator.
@@fromnorway643 if you could, it would refute the globe model, and as you couldn’t have a northern and southern pole star always staying in the same place if we’re traveling through the universe at 1,200,000 miles an hour. You can’t even have Polaris always staying over the North Pole if we’re traveling at that speed. If you are going to say the stars are so far away, look up the inverse square law of light.
@@RobertTozzi
You have absolutely _no_ understanding of interstellar distances!
The distance to Polaris is about *_13 million times_* larger than the width of the Earth's orbit around the Sun. Claiming that the apparent position of Polaris should change throughout the year is like claiming that the apparent position of a distant mountain should change if looking at it with your left eye and then your right eye.
Our Sun would at most be visible from about 50 light-years away, but some giant stars are hundreds or even thousands of times brighter than our Sun. The giant star *_Rigel_* in Orion is about 100,000 times brighter, so using the inverse square law tells us that it would be visible from up to √100,000 x 50 = 15,800 light-years away.
@@fromnorway643 at allegedly 93 million miles away, the sun is 8 light minutes away.
According to the inverse square law, at 16 light minutes, it would be a quarter of the brightness; at a light hour, it would be 1/56th of the brightness; a light day away, it would be 1/32,400 th of the brightness.
So no, we’re not seeing anything from light days away, definitely not light years away. That’s impossible.
Ok
I'm here after Aimers song called Polaris
Anyone else?
We stilñ have to find away to not be destroyed by a grain of sand going 20% the speed of light
The earth is tilting continuously each season, how come it is in the same place?
Earth is not tilting, and it is never in the same place.
@@max5250
Solstices prove otherwise
@@michaelparsons2225
How exactly?!
@@michaelparsons2225
If you haven't understood my question, do notice that currently accepted scientific explanation relies on Earth that is not tilting at all, and fits all our observations perfectly fine.
Now, what makes you think your inability to understand that somehow makes solstice's some kind of a proof that Earth do tilts, although we never observed such tilting.
@max5250
I live in Australia and I see the south pole star, the closest star to the south Celestial pole, also known as sigma octantis.
It's not a very bright star, the reason we use the southern Cross to locate centre, TRUE SOUTH.
My latitude is 45 degrees south and the south Celestial pole is 45 degrees.
It's how latitude and navigation works in the south.
And summer solstice I see the sun rise 23 degrees south east and set 23 degrees south west.
Tropic of Capricorn is 3000 kilometres to my north.
The flat earth sun would always be to my north, it isn't.