An analysis of the debate between Sri Akshobhya Tirtha and Sri Vidyaranya Swamiji | Part 04
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 фев 2020
- Title : An analysis of the debate between Sri Akshobhya Tirtha and Sri Vidyaranya Swamiji
Discourses by : Sri Vidyasreesha Tirtha sripadaru
► Subscribe to Sri Vyasaraja Matha Admin: / srivyasarajamathaadmin
► Like us on Facebook : / srivyasarajamatha
lovely content
At 2.50 to 3, swamiji says whether true or not, let us believe that Akshobhya teertha defeated Vidyaranya swamiji!! I am very sad to hear this. Shraddhe(Faith) & Parampare(Rituals) are not more than historical truth. Shri G.R.Patil has quoted several hitorical proof in his book. None have answered them so far.
The chronology of Akshobhya (1350-65 - pontificate only), Vidyaranya (1302-90), and Vedanta Deshika (1268-1369) shows that there can be no objection on the basis of chronological anomalies.
In every philosophical disputation, one side loses. But none of the ancient biographies “Vijayas” record that the protagonist lost an argument. Naturally, nobody owns up defeat in writing. The Jayapatras written by the loser have not come down to us during the centuries that have elapsed. So the issue whether there was a disputation between the two, and whether Vedanta Deshika was the umpire will always remain in doubt.
There’s an African proverb about the losers not writing the history:”If the lions were to write history, it would read differently.”
G R Patil is right 100%
Where is part 1 2 3
Part 1: ruclips.net/video/uv7eNm7vDMs/видео.html
Part 2: ruclips.net/video/5tgqFJ1aFho/видео.html
Part 3: ruclips.net/video/p8ydHwt6kHQ/видео.html
Adi Shankaracharya's famous sloka from Viveka Chudamani states as follows :-
" Trayo Durlabheshu Daivanugrahahetukam
Manushyatvam Mumukshatvam Mahapurushasamsrayam"
This sloka is in conformance with Dvaita Vedanta.
Can u explain how?
It only says that those 3 are durlabha
@@harshalreddy5476 Very simple, the sloka says that three things are rare to get, which are obtained only through Daiva Anugraha are Human Birth, acquaintance of Maha Purusha's and Moksha.
Dvaitin's ( though they disagree with nature of Jagat, nature of moksha) opinion that Manusha Janma, Maha Purusha Ashraya and Moksha are obtained by Daiva Anugraha.
@@sitaramprasadseptpg1172 so how is that related to dvaita isn’t it something both advaitins and dvaitins agree upon? :)
@@harshalreddy5476 Yes it's both Dvaitin's and Advaitins agree upon
think of unifying Hindu society instead of dividing it
Debate is an integral part of hinduism which other religions lack ..
When the whole world is up against Hinduism and Hindus, here we arguing who defeated whom. We have grown so narrow minded. Shall we pl keep aside our differences and unite else, there will be neither Madhwas nor Shivas left to take this argument further.
ಗುರುಗಳೇ ನಿಮಗೆ ನನ್ನ ಭಕ್ತಿ ಪೂರ್ವಕ ನಮನಗಳು
I m so sad about the fact none of the work of the MadwaSampradya is available in Englsih ............
This is some real pieces of knowledge, why is it limited only to 1 language in all videos
Please contact TS Raghavendran from Tamilnadu. He's written lots of books in English regarding Madhwa Siddantha
You people have no other job.The infighting among various sect of Brahmins are loosening our strengths Why you people are scratching your head for some incident happened during 13th or 14th century
setlur veeraraghavan Nagesh first of all no brahmins are fighting
This is a healthy debate and not a fight...
When there are two conflicting ideas you have to analyse details.. the same happens even in scientific community.
Did u even listen to it, don’t look at the video title and comment.
@@pramod6385 ya I saw it full now what?
Dear sir, its not a fighting.. it's only a discussion... To throw light on the incident that took place about 500 yrs.. all are Vaishnavas. including adi Shankaracharya.. he established his peethas at the places of lord Hari...