All you've said is fine , but if a sunscreen provides everything in such a price then what's the problem with that. It is for those people who are running out of time and they don't have enough time for layering of different products. That's why it's called All I need sunscreen. It is also a moisturizer apart from a sunblock. If it was a plain spf then argument would have gone that, it's just a plain sunscreen , what's so special about it. The other sunscreen in the market has a lot more than just the filters. And so for that matter I didn't find this argument very clever.
Agree .. there is nothing wrong with the sunscreen at all. Just not one I will go for as I prefer physical over chemical filters. It does provide great protection too as was certified by the lab too, which is great.
Thanks for another informative video. The one thing I'll say on behalf of a sunscreen that's both chemical and mineral (I use the Elta MD Clear that contains both) is that it really has much less of a white cast than mineral sunscreen alone. When I'm using a strictly physical sunscreen, I find myself using less than the recommended 1/4 tsp for face and neck because I look like a ghost if i apply the full amount. I've tried pretty much every sunscreen available in the U.S. (I got a chuckle out of your comment about old ingredients being used in the U.S. - so true). I was doubtful about a dual sunscreen but it's actually worked pretty well.
Haha.. that's true, we do look like a ghost while applying the recommended amount with the physical ones. Thank you for sharing your feedback on the dual sunscreens 😊. I might look for one - perhaps one with newer filters ☺
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
All you've said is fine , but if a sunscreen provides everything in such a price then what's the problem with that. It is for those people who are running out of time and they don't have enough time for layering of different products. That's why it's called All I need sunscreen. It is also a moisturizer apart from a sunblock.
If it was a plain spf then argument would have gone that, it's just a plain sunscreen , what's so special about it. The other sunscreen in the market has a lot more than just the filters. And so for that matter I didn't find this argument very clever.
Agree .. there is nothing wrong with the sunscreen at all. Just not one I will go for as I prefer physical over chemical filters. It does provide great protection too as was certified by the lab too, which is great.
Thanks for another informative video. The one thing I'll say on behalf of a sunscreen that's both chemical and mineral (I use the Elta MD Clear that contains both) is that it really has much less of a white cast than mineral sunscreen alone. When I'm using a strictly physical sunscreen, I find myself using less than the recommended 1/4 tsp for face and neck because I look like a ghost if i apply the full amount. I've tried pretty much every sunscreen available in the U.S. (I got a chuckle out of your comment about old ingredients being used in the U.S. - so true). I was doubtful about a dual sunscreen but it's actually worked pretty well.
Haha.. that's true, we do look like a ghost while applying the recommended amount with the physical ones. Thank you for sharing your feedback on the dual sunscreens 😊. I might look for one - perhaps one with newer filters ☺
Great...
😊